Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 292 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
64 Мб
Скачать
433
PLATE
202
INDICATIONS Breast cancer patients undergoing a mastectomy or breast-
conserving procedure are candidates for axillary sentinel lymph node dissec­tion (SNLD) if there is no palpable or clinical evidence of axillary lymph node involvement.  e  nding of breast cancer metastases in axillary lymph nodes changes the staging of the disease, predicts the rate of recurrence and survival, and results in adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or radiation therapy.  e standard axillary lymph node dissection of level I and II nodes has signi cant morbidity, of which lifelong lymphedema is the most feared by patients. Using a combination of radionuclide and dye injections, the correlation of SLND and standard axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in  nding positive lymph nodes is quite high ( percent) in the hands of an experienced surgeon. However, sentinel lymph nodes are o en only identi­ ed in  to  percent of the dissections. Additionally, a false-negative  nd­ing occurs in  to  percent of the patients having SLND—that is to say, the sentinel nodes are negative, but higher nodes are found to be positive.  e advantages of SLND are the fewer complications versus ALND and the abil­ity to identify sentinel lymph nodes that are not in the traditional level I or II areas.  e identi cation of sentinel lymph nodes focuses the histiopathologic examination, which may include immunohistochemical staining as well as the traditional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).  e importance of a micrometas­tases (< mm) is under study; however, the total number of nodes involved with metastases may in uence the adjuvant therapy that is o ered. Contrain­dications to SLND include locally advanced primary cancers (>-cm size); suspicious, palpable axillary lymphadenopathy; multicentric primary breast cancers; prior axillary surgery; and regional breast operations (e.g., breast reduction) that alter normal lymphatic  ow.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin should be free of infection,
as should the preceding breast biopsy site.  e preparation, delivery, and monitoring of the radionuclide solution for injection must be coordinated with the nuclear medicine sta .
ANESTHESIA General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation is preferred,
as many patients will also have ALND and may be having a concurrent reop­eration upon the breast. Most surgeons prefer that the anesthesiologist use a short-acting muscle paralyzing agent for placement of the endotracheal tube such that the motor nerves can still be identi ed with mechanical stimula­tion during the ALND.
POSITION  e patient is placed in a comfortable supine position with the
arm out at  degrees on a padded arm board (figure 1).  is position allows easy access of the breast and the axilla.
S L N D, B
OPERATIVE PREPARATION Approximately  minutes before the start
of the operation, the surgeon injects the radionuclide solution into the breast, using sterile technique. A commercially available sulfur colloid solution using a technetium-m tag is sterilized a er passage through a .-μ m  lter. Four -mL syringes are each loaded with  mL of solution containing about  μC of radioactivity, for a total dose of about  μC. Shielding is not required, but the site is monitored with a radiation survey meter.  e breast is prepared with an antiseptic solution and sterile paper drapes are applied.  e four injection sites are anesthetized with an intrad­ermal injection of local anesthetic.  e pattern shown (figure 2a) allows in ltration above, below, and at either end of the incision from a preceding biopsy. A long ½-in. -gauge needle is used for this injection about the biopsy site or the breast cancer. Many techniques are used for injection of the radionuclide and the blue dye.  e injections may be placed () deeply about the tumor or biopsy cavity (figure 2), () super cially in the sub­dermal or intradermal site over the tumor or about the biopsy site scar, and () super cially about the perimeter of the nipple in a subareolar manner. Care must be taken not to inject into a biopsy cavity.  e breast is washed and the disposal items are surveyed and disposed of in a radiologically safe manner.  e patient proceeds to the operating room. A er induction of anesthesia, the breast, chest, and upper arm are prepared and draped in the usual manner.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE  e same three techniques are available for
injection of about  to  mL of  isosulfan blue vital dye (figure 3). A er injection, the area is massaged for a few minutes.  e dermal lym­phatics may then manifest a faint blue blush streaming toward the axilla. Using a hand-held gamma detector with a sterile cover, the surgeon scans toward the axilla (figure 4) looking for the area with the high- est count rate.  is may be di cult to  nd if the breast tumor or biopsy site is high in the upper/outer quadrant, as a regional “shine through” of the injection site radioactivity may create a very high background level.  e angled head of the gamma counter can be used to advantage, as it allows more medial placement of the detector with an angled view that is away from the injection site but yet still points into the axilla. If the hot­test spot is near the base of the hair-bearing axilla, a transverse incision is made directly over it (figure 5) in such a manner that the incision can be extended later in a medial manner for a standard ALND. Sharp dissection with a scalpel or electrocautery is made through the  rst  to  cm of fat.  e probe explores the open incision to  nd the hottest area (figure 6).
CONTINUES
434
435
PLATE
203
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE Deeper dissection may reveal
some blue lymphatic channels (figure 7)  owing toward the hot region where a lymph node is palpable.  e lymph node is dissected free along with any neighboring lymph nodes that are blue or signi cantly hot (figure 8).  e de nition of “signi cant” is any lymph node that has a radioactivity level greater than  percent of the hottest sentinel node or a level greater than two or three times the background level of the axillary tis­sue. Following removal of the sentinel nodal tissue, the incision is explored with the gamma probe for any other lymph nodes with signi cant radioac­tivity. A basal background level (figure 9) should be present except when the detector is pointed toward the tumor or biopsy injection site. Addition­ally, any  rm or abnormal lymph nodes should be removed.
 e nodal tissue removed is examined and the individual lymph nodes are separated. One node, the sentinel node, should be quite hot, while its neighbors are much less so (figure 10). In the example shown, lymph node A is labeled as the principal sentinel lymph node. Lymph node B is labeled as a sentinel node. Node C is not a sentinel node, as its counts are less than  percent of the principle sentinel node and it is not blue.
S L N D, B
CLOSURE If the sentinel lymph node is in the typical low axillary region,
careful hemostasis is obtained. A decision must be made as to whether to proceed with a standard axillary node lymph dissection (ALND) through a new incision or through extension of the existing incision. If a new incision is required, then closure is performed. Scarpa’s fascia and the subcuticular fat are closed with interrupted  absorbable sutures.  e skin is approxi­mated with  absorbable sutures.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE Most patients who have both SNLD and ALND
are observed overnight until the e ects of the general anesthesia have cleared. Oral intake is resumed as tolerated and oral pain medications are given.  e serous output of the closed-suction Silastic drain is monitored. O en it is removed before the patient is discharged or whenever the output falls to less than  mL per  hours.
Patients with only an SLND are usually operated on in an ambulatory setting.  ey can be discharged home within a few hours when they are alert and have stable vital signs according to the discharge protocol of the surgical unit.
436
437
PLATE
204
INDICATIONS Ventral hernias in the anterior abdominal wall include
both spontaneous (e.g., umbilical, epigastric, and spigelian) and, most com­monly, incisional hernias a er an abdominal operation. Small ventral her­nias less than ½ cm in diameter are o en successfully closed with primary tissue repairs. However, larger ones have a recurrence rate of up to  or  percent when a tissue repair alone is performed. It is estimated that  to  percent of all abdominal operations result in an incisional hernia.  is explains the predominance of such hernias. Fortunately, the use of mesh has revolutionized the repair of abdominal wall hernias. Anterior place­ment of polypropylene mesh as an onlay to the primary repair is helpful and a retrorectus muscle placement is even better. However, the develop­ment of dual-sided mesh has allowed for an improved placement of mesh behind the abdominal wall and the hernial defect.  ese meshes present an intraperitoneal nonadherent surface (expanded polytetra uoroethylene, or PTFE) to the bowel and an open polypropylene mesh grid or screen for adherence and incorporation into the peritoneum and posterior abdomi­nal wall fascia.  e dual-sided meshes can be placed laparoscopically for almost any ventral hernia, but extremely large hernias with loss of abdomi­nal domain or those associated with extensive, dense intra-abdominal adhesions (e.g., peritoneal dialysis, prior peritonitis) are relative contrain­dications.  e meshes are very expensive; however, operating room time and hospital length of stay are shortened.  e laparoscopic incisions cause less pain and there is a faster return to normal activities or work. Finally, laparoscopic repair enables the detection and repair of multiple defects—a common  nding in midline incisional hernias.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  e patient must be free of infections,
especially in the skin. Respiratory function should be optimized with cessa­tion of smoking and appropriate pulmonary function evaluation. If bowel is contained with the hernia, endoscopic visualization, contrast studies, or imaging may be performed and the patient may be given a bowel prepara­tion with a liquid diet and cathartics for  or  days prior to surgery.  e major factors in the occurrence of this hernia, as well as the preceding oper­ative note, should be reviewed.
ANESTHESIA General anesthesia with an endotracheal tube is required.
POSITION  e patient is placed in a supine position with a pillow placed to
produce mild  exion of the hips and knees.  is helps to relax the abdomi­nal wall. For ventral hernias that are not midline, the patient may be posi­tioned with pillows for some lateral elevation of the chest,  ank, and hips.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e patient is given perioperative antibiotics.
An orogastric tube is passed for gastric decompression. A Foley catheter is placed and pneumatic sequential stockings are applied.  e skin is pre­pared in the routine manner.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE  e -mm videoscope port () and the -mm
operating ports (X) are a function of the position of the hernial defect and the preference of the surgeon (figure 1a).  e general principle is that of triangulation.  e ports should be about a hand’s breadth or more apart from each other and the two operating ports should be placed as widely apart as possible. Typical hernias and the placement of ports are shown (figure 1b to e). One of the operating ports should be  mm in size if a -mm videoscope is not available.
 e videoscope port is placed  rst, using the open Hasson technique (Plate ). A er the abdomen is entered safely and the Hasson port secured with the lateral stay sutures, the intraperitoneal space is in ated with car­bon dioxide.  e surgeon sets the gas  ow rate and the maximum pressure (≤ mmHg).  e rising intra-abdominal pressure and total volume of gas infused is observed as the abdomen and hernia distend.  e videoscope is white-balanced and focused.  e optical end, usually a  at or zero-degree angle, is coated with antifog solution and the scope is advanced down the port into the abdomen under direct vision. All four quadrants of the abdo­men are explored visually.  e hernia and its contents are evaluated and additional unrecognized incisional hernial defects may be found, especially in long midline incisions. Omental and other adhesions to the abdominal and anterior abdominal wall about the hernial defect are visualized. A zone
R  V H, L
of about  to  cm must be made clear about the rim of the hernial defect for the wide attachment of the mesh beyond the borders of the actual defect.
Placement of the operating ports begins with the in ltration of the skin with a long-acting local anesthetic.  e local needle may be passed perpen­dicularly full-thickness through the abdominal wall and its entry site veri­ ed with the videoscope.  e skin is incised and the subcutaneous tissues are dilated with a small hemostat.  e abdominal wall is transilluminated with the videoscope to show any regional vessels within the abdominal musculature.  e -mm operating ports are placed, with visualization of their clean entry into the intraperitoneal space.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE In the typical ventral or incisional hernia, the
omentum will have formed some adhesions to the sac of the hernia.  e omentum is grasped near the abdominal wall with the forceps or the dis­secting instrument and gentle traction is applied. Using laparoscopic scis­sors, the surgeon sharply incises the junction of the omentum with the peritoneum of the abdominal wall (figure 2). A er each cut, a sweeping motion in the same area will open up the next zone for cutting. Minimal bleeding occurs. Electrocautery or other heat-generating coagulating sys­tems should be used sparingly and only with full visualization so as to mini­mize the chance of thermal injury to the bowel. Extensive dense adhesions, inability to reduce the hernial contents from the sac, or an enterotomy that is not easily repaired all require conversion to an open laparotomy and repair. A er the abdominal wall adhesions are taken down, the omentum is removed from the hernial sac, which is le intact. A useful maneuver is the inversion of the hernial sac using several  ngers externally (figure 3).  is allows the sharp cutting to continue with the best visualization of the junction of the omentum with the peritoneal sac. Again, gentle traction is applied to the omentum while the surgeon spreads, cuts, and sweeps.  roughout this dissection, the surgeon must be vigilant for the appearance of a loop of bowel hidden within these adhesions. Small and large bowel may also be cautiously cut away from the abdominal wall and hernia sac, but less sweeping and traction is applied lest an enterostomy occur.  e appearance of bile or succus demands a search for the source, which may be repaired laparoscopically or a er conversion to and open laparotomy. Some surgeons regard this complication as a contraindication to the placement of mesh, which is porous and may harbor a chronic infection, requiring eventual removal of the mesh.
A er careful inspection of the omentum and other adhesions that have been removed from the abdominal wall, the surgeon makes a visual mea­surement about the perimeter of the defect to be certain there is an ade­quately clear zone for attachment of the mesh and its sutures. In general,  to  cm is su cient. An important next step is to lower the intra-abdominal CO
gas pressure to about  or  mmHg, which minimizes the stretching of
the abdominal wall and hernia. If measurements of the defect are made with the abdomen fully in ated at  mmHg, the mesh will be too large. It will become very wrinkled and loose when the CO is removed at the end of the operation.  e size of the defect is measured. Some surgeons use an internal measurement based upon a -cm spread, tip to tip, of the opened dissecting instrument. Most perform an external measurement and marking maneuver (figure 4). A long needle is passed perpendicularly at the edge of the fascial defect in each of the four quadrants.  e entrance site at the internal edge of the hernial defect is veri ed with the videoscope and the external sites are marked with indelible ink.  e pattern of the defect is outlined so as to determine the size and shape of the mesh. A - to -cm margin is drawn out from this defect.  is is marked and measured for choosing the mesh’s size and shape (figure 4).  e dual-sided mesh is prepared with placement of four sutures, one in each quadrant (figure 5).  e sutures are nonabsorb­able  in size and may be placed with parallel with or perpendicular to the edge of the mesh. A useful maneuver is to use a pair of parallel sutures in one axis ( and  o’clock) and perpendicular sutures in the other axis ( and  o’clock). In this manner, the axis for internal attachment is identi ed when the mesh is not round in shape. Each suture is tied in its midpoint and the long tails are le intact.  e mesh is rolled snugly with the expanded PTFE surface on the inside and the polypropylene mesh on the outside, so as not to create tension that may peel the two layers apart (figure 6).
CONTINUES
438
439
PLATE
205
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE In the hernia illustrated, the
-mm Hasson port for the videoscope was placed in the le lateral abdomi­nal position.  is large port site is needed for the di cult passage of the rolled up mesh through the abdominal wall. A useful technique is to pass a grasping forceps through an operating port and then out through the Hasson port (figure 7).  e port tube is removed and the rolled up mesh is grasped with the forceps (figure 8) and drawn back into the abdomen.  e mesh is unrolled and oriented with the smooth expanded PTFE surface down toward the bowel. Getting the mesh into the abdomen and unrolling it in the correct orientation can be quite tedious.  e mesh is  rst secured with one of the preattached sutures at the four quadrants. Most surgeons begin with the  or  o’clock sutures.  e four previously marked skin sites are incised with a No.  scalpel blade, which makes a -mm skin opening (figure 9). A special suturing needle is passed perpendicularly through the abdominal wall.  e needle tip is opened and one of the suture ends is grasped as it closes.  e loose suture end is brought out through the abdomi­nal wall and secured with a hemostat. A special suturing needle is passed again through the abdominal incision, but this time it is aimed to enter the abdominal space about  cm away from the  rst site.  e other half of the tied suture is grasped and brought out.  e suture is tied down through the skin incision, setting the knot deeply.  is secures the mesh to the abdom­inal wall within (figure 9).  is transabdominal suturing continues with placement of the two lateral sutures and then, last, the opposite ( o’clock) suture. In general, the mesh should be slightly loose but not wrinkled rather than precisely tight.  e exposed perimeter of the mesh is now secured with an endoscopic stapling device. Spiral screws or tacks are preferred.
R  V H, L
 ese are placed  cm apart. It is important that the perimeter be securely attached with closely spaced tacks such that no bowel or omentum can get under the edge of the mesh. Placement of the tacks is facilitated by hav­ing the surgeon apply external counterpressure with the hand while the tacking instrument spreads out the mesh in a radial manner (figure 11).  ese two actions provide a little lip to the edge of the mesh, thus allowing a more precise placement of each tack. Upon completion of the procedure, the abdomen is lavaged with the suction irrigator. Careful inspection is made for any bleeding sites and bile or succus. Each of the operating ports is removed under direct vision to be certain that there are no bleeding sites in the abdominal wall. As intra-abdominal gas is vented, the  nal view of the loosely applied mesh is seen (figure 12).  e fascia of any -mm port site is closed with  delayed absorbable sutures.  e skin is approximated with  ne subcuticular sutures. Adhesive skin strips and dry sterile dressings are applied.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE  e orogastric tube is removed before the patient
awakens and the Foley catheter is discontinued when the patient is alert enough to void. He or she may experience a moderate amount of pain for a day or so. Clear liquids are resumed within  day and the diet is advanced as tolerated. Some surgeons recommend the use of an abdominal binder for  month a er surgery. Hematomas and surgical-site infections can occur.  e latter may require eventual removal of the mesh if the infection becomes chronic. Accumulation of serum in the old hernial sac occurs frequently and may require aspiration. Last, some patients may experience chronic pain at the sites of  xation.
440
441
PLATE
206
INDICATIONS An umbilical hernia is usually a congenital defect, although
a variation may follow surgery such as the placement of an incision or lap­aroscopic port in this region.  e increased susceptibility to strangulation of an umbilical hernia in an adult necessitates repair as the patient’s condi­tion permits.
Repair of an umbilical hernia in the very young child is rarely indicated, since  percent of these fascial defects will close by the age of  years. In addition, the incidence of incarceration and strangulation within an umbil­ical hernia in this age group is extremely low. However, if supportive mea­sures such as the “keystone” type of strapping during infancy have failed and the fascial ring is su ciently large to admit the index  nger, the hernia should be repaired before school age.
PREOPERATIVE PREPARATION  is defect is usually seen in either chil-
dren or obese adults, and the preoperative preparation depends entirely upon the patient’s general condition and age. Obese patients are placed on a reducing diet. A general medical assessment is indicated.  e patient may be placed on a low-residue diet for a day or two and the bowels emptied with a mild purgative. Repair is delayed in the presence of acute respiratory infection, chronic cough, or infection about the navel. Special attention is given to cleaning of the navel.
ANESTHESIA Spinal anesthesia may be preferred in large hernias because
of the excellent relaxation it provides; however, inhalation anesthesia can be used if not contraindicated. Inhalation anesthesia is the method of choice for children.
POSITION  e patient is placed in a comfortable supine position.
OPERATIVE PREPARATION  e skin is prepared in the usual manner a er
the umbilicus has been carefully cleaned.  is may require cotton applica­tors saturated with antiseptic to reach any deep crevices.
INCISION AND EXPOSURE A curved incision placed superiorly or
inferiorly about the umbilicus is most commonly used (figure 1). A vertical incision that curves around the umbilicus may be necessary for very large hernias.  e umbilicus proper should be retained in the skin  ap.  e incision is made to the hernia sac.  e sac is easily mobilized except for its attachment to the back of the umbilical skin.  is is dis­sected carefully so as not to create a buttonhole that may put the repair at risk for infection.  e neck of the herniated sac is then dissected from adjacent tissues by a combination of blunt and sharp dissection, which is carried down to the level of the linea alba and anterior sheaths of the rectus muscle.
R  U H
ADULTS
If an intermediate-sized defect in the range of  to  cm is found, many surgeons prefer to repair it with the two layer “vest-over-trousers” (Mayo) technique (figures 4, 5, and 6).  e upper fascia is imbricated over the lower fascia with a row of interrupted  sutures.  ese begin and end high on the vest, while the trousers are secured in a horizontal manner at the belt line (figure 4). When these sutures are secured, the free superior edge (vest) overhangs the inferior fascia (trousers) and a second layer of inter­rupted  sutures is used to secure the free edge (figure 5a).  e tech­nique is illustrated schematically in the cross-sectional view illustrated in
figure 6.
Many surgeons believe that a medium to large defect should be repaired with mesh, as primary tissue repairs in large hernias have a signi cant recurrence rate.  e preferred site for placement of the mesh is posterior to the defect and posterior rectus sheath. If the zone between the peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath can be freely dissected, some surgeons use a polypropylene mesh a er  rst being certain that the omentum is directly behind this region when the umbilical hernia sac is closed. Alternatively, if this plane cannot be developed and the mesh must be placed in an intra­peritoneal position, a dual-sided mesh is used wherein the smooth, non­adherent expanded polytetra uoroethylene (PTFE) surface is posterior toward the omentum and bowel, while the polypropylene screen-like mesh is anterior against the peritoneum and posterior fascia (figure 6a).  e mesh should be sized to extend  to  cm beyond the anticipated edges of the closed defect.  is mesh is secured with nonabsorbable  mattress sutures that are placed full-thickness through the linea alba at the  and  o’clock positions and through the rectus sheaths and muscle at the  and  o’clock positions.  ese sutures should secure only the polypropylene mesh and should not go full-thickness through the PTFE, as this may pres­ent a free intra-abdominal loop that may catch a loop of bowel.  e anchor­ing sutures are tied and the defect is closed either vertically or transversely using interrupted  sutures.
CLOSURE A er careful hemostasis is obtained, the apex of the subcutaneous
tissue beneath the umbilicus is sutured down to the linea alba with  absorb­able sutures.  is produces the desirable ingoing bellybutton. Further absorb­able sutures are used to obliterate the subcutaneous dead space. A triple-bite suture that secures Scarpa’s fascia to the deep fascia and then the Scarpa’s fascia on the other side of the incision minimizes the space for a potential accumula­tion of serum or a hematoma. When the hernia is quite large, a closed-system Silastic suction catheter may be placed through an adjacent stab wound.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE Special attention is given to the avoidance of abdom-
inal distention. An adhesive tape strip  in. wide is liberally applied across the abdomen, and the patient may use an abdominal binder for approximately  month.  e patient is warned to avoid overly heavy li ing and straining.
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE Most commonly, omentum is contained within
the sac, but small and large bowel may also be present. Frequently the omen­tum will have formed adhesions to various areas of the sac, thus preventing reduction of the hernia. Sharp dissection is required to detach hernial con­tents from the sac as well as from the peritoneum around the neck of the sac as it joins the peritoneum. When there is a strong suspicion of gangrenous intestine within the sac, the abdominal cavity should be entered through an extended midline incision that enters either above or below the umbilicus.  is incision is extended to the fascial defect and up the side of the sac so as to allow complete mobilization of the incarcerated bowel.  e intestine is either reduced or resected as indicated. In the majority of cases, omentum is incarcerated within the sac.
In these patients, the sac may be opened (figure 2). If the omentum cannot easily be freed and/or reduced, it is wise to resect it with sequential clamping and suture ligature placement. When the contents of the sac have been reduced and its neck has been well de ned, a decision is made as to how to repair the fascial defect.
In general, when the defect is less than  cm in diameter, the peritoneum is closed and the excess sac excised.  e perimeter of the fascial defect is cleaned of fat both anteriorly and posteriorly, and a primary repair is per­formed using interrupted  sutures that may be of a delayed absorbable or nonabsorbable nature (figure 3).  is primary repair is performed only for small defects of . cm or less.
CHILDREN
DETAILS OF PROCEDURE A curved incision around the superior half
of the umbilical depression is made and the hernia sac is freed down to the linea alba.  is dissection extends laterally onto either rectus sheath.  e hernia sac is dissected free from the back of the umbilical skin, using countertraction with skin hooks.  e fascia is cleaned for a few centimeters in all directions. In most patients, the sac can be reduced without being opened.  e edges of the fascial ring are grasped with Kocher clamps and the posterior aspect of the fascia is cleaned for  or  cm. As most of these fascial defects are small, a primary repair using  interrupted sutures can be performed in either a vertical or horizontal manner, depending upon the shape of the defect.
CLOSURE  e skin margins are approximated with interrupted subcutic-
ular  absorbable suture. Skin strips are applied and the umbilicus is packed with a small wad of gauze. A dry sterile dressing is applied.
POSTOPERATIVE CARE  e routine postoperative care is performed.
Most patients are able to tolerate  uid within a few hours and are dis­charged home within a day on a so diet.  e skin of the umbilicus should be observed for viability if an extensive dissection has been performed. In most patients, the curved periumbilical incision becomes minimally visible as the area heals.
442
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025