Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 256 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
77 Мб
Скачать
152
ab
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y. Vetter and U. Vieweg
• Shoulder dislocation
• A common complication of the prone position is increased bleeding, mostly due to damage to engorged vertebral veins
21.11 Positioning inSpinal Surgery
The most common forms of positioning in spinal surgery are:
The Prone Position (see Fig.21.3a–c)
• Used mainly for posterior procedures requiring access to the thoracic and lumbar spine.
The Lateral Position (see Fig.21.4a, b)
• Used generally for anterior access to the thoracic and lumbar spine. The Supine Position (see Fig.21.5a, b)
• Used for procedures requiring access to the anterior cervi­cal, thoracic and lumbar spine. The da Vinci Position (see Fig.21.6)
• Used for procedures requiring access to the anterior lower lumbar/sacral spine.
c
Fig. 21.3 (a–c) Patient in prone position on operating table with head ring (a) position of the legs (b) and (c) with horseshoe-shaped headrest
Fig. 21.4 (a, b) Patient in lateral position for anterior lumbar/thoracic procedure
ab
21 Patient Positioning Techniques inSpinal Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 21.5 (a, b) Patient in supine position for anterior cervical spine procedure
• Thorax, pelvic and wedge cushions, padded roll
• Special bolster for the prone position
• Use adaptable arm positioning devices,
• Position the head on the special head positioning cushion,
• Position the axillae freely with the thorax pad and ensure
153
Positioning: Positioning on a standard operating table (Fig.21.3a–c):
or skull-clamp
that the pelvic pad does not extend beyond the anterior superior iliac crest.
21.11.1.2 Checklist forPosterior Surgical
Fig. 21.6 da Vinci position for anterior lower lumbar procedure
Intervention totheLumbar/Sacral andThoracic Spine intheProne Position
21.11.1 The Prone Position
21.11.1.1 Surgery intheThoracic andLumbar Spine Areas intheProne Position
(See Fig.21.3a–c)
The prone position in which the patient is positioned head­rst has traditionally been and remains the most common position used to access the posterior aspect of the thoracical, lumbar or sacral spine. The prone position is comfortable for surgeons, providing an adequate overview of both bone and neural structures in the treatment of fractures, deformities, tumours, spondylodiscitis, spondylolisthesis and degenera­tive disc disease. The patient may be at risk of the develop­ment of pressure ulcers and nerve damage. The position causes additional pressure for the skin and bony promi­nences. For this reason, positioning and, in particular, the aids employed must take these effects into account. The patient’s arms should be tucked at the patient’s sides with a bed-sheet and secured with arm guards to sleds.
Preparations:
• Arm positioning devices
• Special head positioning cushion for prone position
Operating table: Radiolucent modular operating table system
Positioning aids: Disposable sheet as underlay, towel as stretch cover, gel head cushion, white disposable head cush­ion, two-arm positioning devices with gel pads for arms, abdominal xation belt, body warming blanket, surgical cot­ton sheet as top cover, horseshoe-shaped headrest (foam or silicone), silicone pads, half-roll, two to three tempur pillows.
Important: The positioning should minimize the restric­tion of the abdomen. Attach ECG leads to the back. Provide pressure ulcer prophylaxis, particularly in the region of the patellae, the heads of the bulae, the toes, the iliac crest, the chin, the eyes, nose and arms. Do not ex arms signicantly beyond 90° (risk of plexus damage); upper arms must not be constricted. Ensure male genitalia are not restricted and are not subjected to pressure. Mammae must also not be sub­jected to pressure. Ensure head and cervical vertebrae are in orthograde position. Use surgical site lm in the sacral region to seal the anal cleft and prevent moisture collecting here, thus avoiding the risk of burns.
154
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y. Vetter and U. Vieweg
21.11.1.3 Checklist forDisc Surgery andMicrosurgical Decompression oftheLumbar Spine intheProne Position
Table: Radiolucent modular operating table system
Positioning aids: Sheet as underlay, towel as stretch cover,
head gel cushion with surgical cap, white disposable head cushion, one arm positioning device with gel pads, Ulmer wheel, abdominal xation belt, body warming blanket, sur­gical cotton sheet as top cover, two-arm positioning devices, gel cushions, gel mats, horseshoe-shaped headrest, silicon pads, half-roll, positioning frame, two to three cushioning pillows.
Important: Position iliac crest on the pelvic pad. Attach buttock supports to the upper gluteal fold. The thorax cush­ion should not touch the chin and should not extend beyond the lower end of the sternum. Patellae should not be restricted. The anal fold must be sealed with lm to ensure that no moisture can penetrate. Provide for pressure ulcer prophy­laxis, particularly in the region of the patellae, the heads of the bulae, the toes, the iliac crest, the chin, the eyes, the nose and arms. Do not ex arms signicantly beyond 90° (risk of plexus damage). Ensure male genitalia and Mammae are not restricted. Ensure head and cervical vertebrae are in orthograde position.
21.11.1.4 Posterior Access totheCervical Spine
withHorseshoe-Shaped Headrest (Skull Clamp) intheProne Position
Indications are surgical procedures with posterior access to the upper and lower cervical spine. The options for intraop­erative, external repositioning of the patient are limited.
Preparations:
• Arm positioning devices
• Horseshoe-shaped headrest or skull clamp
Positioning:
• Prone positioning of the operating table in the theatre.
• Fix and pre-position the horseshoe-shaped headrest to the
head part of the operating table.
• Move the patient towards the head end until the shoulders
are at the upper edge of the operating table with the scap-
ulae still on the table.
• Position and x the head in the horseshoe-shaped
headrest.
• Position both arms along the body with arm protectors or
secure the arms, x in place with plasters if necessary.
21.11.1.5 Checklist forSurgery tothePosterior Cervical Spine intheProne Position
Table: Extension table, carbon bre-top table
Positioning aids: Half-roll, gel cushions, footrest,
horseshoe- shaped headrest or skull clamp, arm extender, Fixomull tape, brown Leukoplast tape, sheet for arm xation.
Important: Arm traction to improve lateral image quality may be considered but handled with caution due to nerval damage, especially of the C5 root. Cushioning in particular of the feet and the face are mandatory to avoid pressure caused ulcers (see Figs.21.5 and 21.6).
21.11.2 Lateral Position
The indications for spinal surgery in the lateral position include procedures addressing the ventral column like interbody fusion or vertebral body replacement. For lateral positioning, the patient is placed either on the left or right side, depending on the side of the surgical access (Fig.21.4a, b). The head should be placed in a pillow or head positioner and the positioning of the ear should be monitored. The patient’s physiological spinal and neck alignment should be maintained during the proce­dure, and a safety restraint should be secured across the hips. Risks to a patient in the lateral position include pressure to points on the dependent side of the body, such as ears, shoul­ders, ribs, hips, knees and ankles, as well as brachial plexus injury, venous pooling and diminished lung capacity.
21.11.2.1 Checklist forSurgery Requiring
Access toThoracic/Lumbar Spine intheLateral Position
Table: Radiolucent modular operating table system
Positioning aids: Sheet as underlay, towel as stretch cover,
gel head cushion with surgical cap, white disposable head cushion, two-arm positioning devices with gel pads for arms, Ulmer wheel, abdominal xation belt, two body warming blankets, surgical cotton sheet as top cover, backrest, one three-sectioned support, two two-sectioned supports, three gel pads, disposable tunnel cushion.
Important: Attach upper arm at 90° to specially padded anaesthesia screen, sheets in the ank, legs parallel and pad­ded with cushions and gel mats. Provide for pressure ulcer prophylaxis, particularly in the region of the trochanters, malleoli, calcanei and head of the bula. Do not ex arms beyond 90° and do not position below the thorax (risk of
21 Patient Positioning Techniques inSpinal Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
155
plexus damage). Ensure the head is in orthograde position (risk of impaired blood perfusion). Ensure male genitals, in particular, are not restricted.
21.11.3 Supine Position
21.11.3.1 Checklist forSurgery totheCervical Spine intheSupine Position
(Fig.21.5a, b)
Table: Radiolucent modular operating table system
Positioning aids: Gel pads, half-roll, footrest, head ring,
gauze dressings, Fixomull tape, brown Leukoplast tape, sheet for arm xation, arm extender, backrest. Place a towel roll under the cervical spine or scapula. Extension of the arms ensures intraoperative uoroscopy of the cervical spine is possible without superimposition of the scapulae. Provide pressure ulcer prophylaxis, particularly in the region of the heels, the elbows, the buttocks
21.11.4 Checklist forSurgical Procedures
Requiring Access totheLower Lumbar Spine intheda Vinci Position
(Fig.21.6)
3. McCulloch JA, Young PH. Microsurgery for lumbar disc hernia­tion. In: McCulloch JA, Young PH, editors. Essentials of spinal microsurgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998. p.329–82.
4. Lipton S.Anesthesia in the surgery of retropulsed vertebral discs. Anaesthesia. 1950;5:208–12.
5. Tarlov IM.The knee chest position for lower spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:1193–4.
6. Wayne SJ.The tuck position for lumbar disc surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:1195–8.
7. Ray CD.New kneeling attachment and cushioned face rest for spi­nal surgery. Neurosurgery. 1987;20:266–9.
8. Stephens GC, Yoo JU, Wilbur G. Comparison of lumbar sagit­tal alignment produced by different operative positions. Spine. 1996;21:1802–6.
9. Hastings DE.A simple frame for operations on the lumbar spine. Can J Surg. 1969;12:251.
10. Relton JE, Hall JE. An operation frame for spinal fusion. A new apparatus designed to reduce haemorrhage during operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967;49:327–32.
11. NICE. Clinical-practice-guideline, the management of inadver­tent perioperative hypothermia in adults. National Collaborating Centre for Nursing and Supportive Care commissioned by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2007. http://
guidance.nice.org.uk/CG65. Accessed 23 Jan 2015.
12. Torossian A, Bräuer A, Höcker J, etal. Clinical practice guideline: preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:166–72.
Suggested Reading
Table: Radiolucent modular operating table system
Positioning aids: Sheet as underlay, towel as stretch cover,
gel head cushion with surgical cap, white disposable head cushion, two-arm positioning devices with gel pads for arms, Ulmer wheel, abdominal xation belt, body warming blan­ket, surgical cotton sheet as top cover.
Important: Provide for pressure ulcer prophylaxis, par­ticularly in the region of the buttocks and heels. Position gel cushions under both legs. Do not ex arms beyond 90° and do not position below the level of the thorax (risk of plexus damage). Ensure head and cervical vertebrae are in ortho­grade position.
References
1. Batson OV. The function of vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. Ann Surg. 1940;112:139–49.
2. Norgore M. Clinical anatomy of the vertebral veins. Surgery. 1945;17:606.
Ali AA, Breslin DS, Hardman HD, Martin G.Unusual presentation and
complication of the prone position for spinal surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:471–3.
Botsman O, Hyrkas J, Hirvensalo E, Kallio E.Blood loss, operating
time, and positioning of the patient in lumbar disc surgery. Spine. 1990;15:360–3.
Callahan RA, Brown MD. Positioning techniques in spinal surgery.
Clin Orthop. 1981;154:22–6.
Campbell K. Pressure points in the operating room. J Enterostomal
Ther. 1989;16:119–24.
Chu YC, Tsai SK, Chan KH, et al. Lateral medullary syndrome
after prone position for general surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95:1451–3.
DiStefano VJ, Klein KS, Nixon JE, Andrews ET.Intra-operative analy-
sis of the effects of position and body habitus on surgery of the low back. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop. 1974;99:51–6.
Ecker A.Kneeling position for operations on the lumbar spine. Surgery.
1949;25:112. Ford LT.Position for lumbar disc surgery. Clin Orthop. 1977;123:104. Guanciale AF, Dinsay JM, Watkins RG.Lumbar lordosis in spinal
fusion. A comparison of intraoperative results of patient position-
ing on two different operative table frames. Spine. 1996;21:964–9. Keim HA, Weinstein JD. Acute renal failure. A complication
of spine fusion in the tuck position. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1970;52A:1248–51.
156
https://t.me/medicina_free
S. Y. Vetter and U. Vieweg
Knight DJW, Mahajan RP. Patient positioning in anesthesia. Contin
Educ Anesth Crit Care Pain. 2004;4(5):160–3.
Krettek C, Aschemann D.Positioning techniques in surgical applica-
tion. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.
McNulty SE, Weiss J, Azad SS, etal. The effect of the prone position on
venous pressure and blood loss during lumbar laminectomy. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:220–5.
Ogbue MN, Jefferson P, Ball DR.Perioperative peripheral nerve injury.
Anaesthesia. 2001;56:393–4.
Park CK.The effect of patient positioning on intraabdominal pressure
and blood loss in spinal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:552–7.
Papantonio C, Wallop JM, Kolodner KB.Sacral ulcers following cardiac
surgery: incidence and risks. Adv Skin Wound Care. 1994;7:24–36.
Pearce DJ. The role of posture in laminectomy. Proc R Soc Med.
1957;50:109.
Phillips NF. Berry & Kohn’s operating room technique. 10th ed. St.
Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.
Prielipp RC, Morell RC, Buttworth J.Ulnar nerve injury and periopera-
tive arm positioning. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2002;20:351–65. Schonauer C, Bochetti A, Barbagallo G, etal. Positioning on surgical
table. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S50–5. Servant C, Purkiss S. Positioning patients for surgery. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; 2002. Sessler DI. Complications and treatment of mild hypothermia.
Anesthesiology. 2001;95:531–43. St-Arnaud D, Paquin M. Safe positioning for neurosurgical patients.
AORN J. 2008;87(6):1156–72. Sutterlin C, Rechtine GR.Using Hefngton frame in elective lumbar
spinal surgery. Orthop Rev. 1988;17:597–600. Tao-Chen L, Lin-Cheng Y, Han-Jung C. Effect of patient position
and hypotensive anesthesia on inferior vena cava pressure. Spine.
1998;23:941–7.
Part II
https://t.me/medicina_free
Anterior Upper Cervical Spine
Overview ofSurgical Techniques
https://t.me/medicina_free
andImplants fortheAnterior Upper Cervical Spine
MeicH.Schmidt
22
22.1 Introduction and Core Messages
The upper cervical spine represents a unique biomechan­ical and anatomic region that requires specialized surgi­cal techniques and implants. Most commonly, the upper cervical spine is affected by trauma (odontoid fractures and nonunions), occipital-cervical dislocations, or degenerative processes, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, which results in atlantoaxial instability. Trauma indica­tions include Jefferson fractures with instability and dis­ruption of the transverse ligament, odontoid fractures that are mobile in exion and extension, and C1–2 dislo­cations. In rheumatoid degenerative instability of the C1–2 joints, the indications are also inclusive of decom­pression of the spinal cord and then subsequent stabiliza­tion. The four most common surgical techniques for the region are anterior odontoid screw xation, transoral resection of the odontoid process, posterior C1–2 xa­tion, and anterior transarticular screw xation [14].
22.2 Approaches
Approaches and implants for the anterior upper cervical spine are complex, corresponding to the unusual biomechan­ical and anatomic arrangement of that part of the spine. Some of them are not recommended as a stand-alone technique. Frequently, for example, a transoral resection of the odontoid is performed in conjunction with a posterior cervical fusion. Anterior approaches to the upper cervical spine are fre­quently based on modications of the standard approach for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, which is extended toward the head (cephalad).
22.2.1 Transoral Approach
There are two common transoral approaches for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis or fracture/instability. The transoral resection is more commonly performed in rheu­matoid disease for decompression of the spinal cord. This is frequently done through the mouth if the patient is able to open the mouth widely enough (Fig.22.1). It requires a specialized retractor system, as described in Chap. 17. We do not usually place instrumentation using this approach.
M. H. Schmidt (*) Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA e-mail: MHSchmidt@salud.unm.edu
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2023 U. Vieweg, F. Grochulla (eds.), Manual of Spine Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64062-3_22
22.2.2 Extraoral Ventral Retropharyngeal
Approach
On rare occasions, a similar approach can be used for the placement of anterior transarticular screws (see Chap. 16). This can be done when there is C1–2 instability or an odon­toid fracture (Fig. 22.2). The retropharyngeal approach is used, and then bilateral transarticular screws are passed from an anterior approach using a K-wire system. This can be done in combination with an odontoid screw. Typically, this procedure can also be done with K-wires and cannulated screws, but the K-wires must be carefully monitored so they do not migrate after insertion of the screws.
159
160
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 22.1 Photograph
showing transoral exposure using the Spetzler–Sonntag retractor
M. H. Schmidt
a b
Fig. 22.2 Computed tomography scans showing C2/3 fracture dislocation (a) and C2/3 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (b) using a retro-
pharyngeal submandibular approach
22 Overview ofSurgical Techniques andImplants fortheAnterior Upper Cervical Spine
https://t.me/medicina_free
161
22.3 Implants
22.3.1 Screws
The screws used for xation in anterior approaches to the upper cervical spine are varied and depend on the approach used. With odontoid screw xation, we use noncannulated screws, although others advise against their use. For the ret­ropharyngeal approach, bilateral transarticular screws are typically used, sometimes in combination with an odontoid screw. Cannulated screws can be used. Anterior transarticu­lar screws should be lag screws since this will “lag” together the C1/2 joint for fusion.
22.3.2 Plating
Anterior plating has been described but is rarely used. The predominant indication is traumatic instability after C1 frac­ture or resection of the odontoid. The Harms plating system has been described by Ruf etal. [1].
References
1. Ruf M, Melcher R, Harms J.Transoral reduction and osteosynthe-
sis C1 as a function-preserving option in the treatment of unstable
Jefferson fractures. Spine. 2004;29:823–7.
2. Russo A, Albanese E, Quiroga M, Ulm AJ.Submandibular approach
to the C2–3 disc level: microsurgical anatomy with clinical applica-
tion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:380–9.
3. Schmelzle R, Harms J.Craniocervical junction–diseases, diagnos-
tic application of imaging procedures, surgical techniques. Fortschr
Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1987;32:206–8.
4. Vender JR, Harrison SJ, McDonnell DE. Fusion and instrumenta-
tion at C1–3 via the high anterior cervical approach. J Neurosurg.
2000;92:24–9.
Odontoid Screw Fixation
https://t.me/medicina_free
MeicH.Schmidt
23
23.1 Introduction and Core Messages
Anterior odontoid screw xation is ideal for xation of unstable odontoid fractures and is superior to posterior C1–2 arthrodesis as it preserves C1–2 rotational move­ment and obviates the need for autograft bone harvest. This method has become increasingly popular since the time it was introduced by Bohler [1], and it is now widely used to treat unstable type II and shallow type III odontoid fractures [29]. The goals of odontoid screw xation are immediate stabilization of type II odontoid fractures or shallow type III odontoid frac­tures with no need for external orthosis.
23.2 Indications
• Type II odontoid fractures
• Shallow type III odontoid fractures that have failed non­operative treatment
• Elderly patients who have failed halo xation and exter­nal orthosis
• Patients that do not want to use halo xation or external orthosis
23.3 Contraindications
• Severe associated C1 and C2 fractures
• Occipital cervical instability associated with type II odon­toid fractures
• Fractures that are older than 18months
• Patients that have excessive cervical kyphosis
• Patients with a large chest (barrel chest)
• Anterior oblique fracture (see Fig.23.1a)
23.4 Technical Prerequisites
It is essential that the patient can be intubated beroptically by an experienced anesthesiologist. Neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs), can be performed.
Awake nasotracheal or beroptic intubation is used if
there is instability in extension. Traditional laryngoscopic intubation is safe if the fracture reduces in extension. We highly recommend using two uoroscopy machines for bilateral views simultaneously of the anterior-posterior (AP) upper cervical spine and the lateral upper cervical spine. Because we use the Aesculap anterior odontoid screw xa­tion system, which allows for intraoperative reduction of the odontoid fracture, we do not require complete preoperative reduction of the fracture.
M. H. Schmidt (*) Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA e-mail: MHSchmidt@salud.unm.edu
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2023 U. Vieweg, F. Grochulla (eds.), Manual of Spine Surgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64062-3_23
23.5 Planning, Preparation,
andPositioning
We routinely include the upper sternum and the neck in the sterile preparation. The patient is placed in the supine posi­tion with head immobilized with 10lb of traction via a halter device. Alternatively, Gardner–Wells tongs can be used or halo traction can be used if the patient has already been in the
163
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025