Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Assessment of the severity of the condition of patients in the provision of emergency therapeutic and surgical medical care at the prehospital stage.

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
12.08.2026
Размер:
1 Мб
Скачать

The sum of the points in three sections and its correspondence to the level of consciousness:

clear consciousness — 15;

stunning — 13–14;

sopor — 9–12;

coma — 4–8;

brain death — 3.

Do not forget that the implementation of a motor reaction may be hampered by the presence of plegia or paresis on one or both sides. Consult a neuroresuscitator.

In the absence of speech, “verbal hash” or failure to follow instructions at a clearly sufficient level of wakefulness, you need to think about the presence of aphasic disorders and consult with a neurologist or neuroreanimatologist.

3.2. DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE

Acute respiratory (respiratory) failure (ARF = ODN (rus)) is a rapidly increasing (development time of several minutes/days) severe pathological condition of the patient, caused by the incompatibility of the external respiration system with the metabolic needs of the body to maintain normal partial tension of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the arterial blood, or it is achieved after due to increased work of the respiratory and circulatory systems, which leads to a decrease and subsequent depletion of the body's functional capabilities. Dyspnea is an early symptom of ARF, subjectively manifested by a feeling of lack of air or difficulty breathing. At the same time, the frequency, rhythm and depth of breathing change, accompanied by an increase in the work of the respiratory muscles.

Severity of ARF syndrome:

1. Ventilation ARF:

normal: PaCO2 = 35–45 mmHg;

grade I (moderate): PaCO2 < 50 mmHg;

grade II (expressed): PaCO2 = 51–69 mmHg;

grade III (heavy): PaCO2 > 70 mmHg;

hypercapnic coma: PaCO2 = 90–140 mmHg.

2. Parenchymal ODN:

normal: PaO2 = 80–100 mmHg (SpO2 ≥ 95 mmHg);

grade I (moderate): PaO2 = 60–79 mmHg (SpO2 = 90–94 %);

grade II (expressed): PaO2 = 40–59 mmHg (SpO2 = 76–89 %);

grade III (severe): PaO2 < 40 mmHg (SpO2 ≤ 75 %);

hypoxemic coma: PaO2 = 39–30 mmHg.

111

Hemoglobin oxygen saturation of less than 90 % indicates ARF (category of evidence). Based on the level of decompensation of the respiratory and circulatory systems, consciousness, oxygen and carbon dioxide content in the blood, three stages of ARF are distinguished.

Stage I ARF. The patient is conscious, complains of a feeling of lack of air, is restless, and asthenic. The skin is pale, moist, slight acrocyanosis of visible mucous membranes. Heart rate up to 30 respiratory movements per minute, heart rate up to 110 bpm, BP is normal or slightly increased, PaO2 decreases to 70 mmHg, PaCO2 reduced due to compensatory shortness of breath.

Stage II ARF. The patient complains of severe suffocation, possible development of psychomotor agitation, impaired consciousness, delirium, and hallucinations. The skin is wet, cyanotic, often in combination with hyperemia. Heart rate 30–40 respiratory movements per minute, heart rate 120–140 bpm often arrhythmia, hypertension is recorded, PaO2 decreases to 60 mmHg, PaCO2 rises to 50 mmHg.

Stage III ARF. Consciousness is clouded or absent, convulsive syndrome may develop due to brain hypoxia, spotty cyanosis is observed, hypoxic pupillary dilation with lack of reaction to light. When the process progresses, tachypnea (BP > 40 respiratory movements per minute) becomes bradypnea (BP < 8 respiratory movements per minute). Hypotension, tachyarrhythmia are observed, PaO2 decreases to 50 mmHg and below, PaCO2 rises to 90 mmHg and above.

3.3. INJURY SEVERITY SCALE (ISS)

S.P. Baker et al in 1974 developed the ISS based on the Abbreviated injury scale (AIS) [5–7]. The AIS was created in 1969 (and refined in 1990) [2]. According to the abbreviated injury severity scale — AIS, currently adopted in most countries, those injuries that give a mortality rate of 25 % or more are considered critical. These include: intracranial hematomas with a volume of more than 80 cm3, bilateral large hemothorax, multiple liver ruptures with hemoperitoneum of more than 1 500 ml, multiple unstable pelvic fractures with ruptured joints and similar injuries in each of the 6 anatomical areas of the human body (head/neck and face, spine, chest, abdominal cavity, pelvic bones, limbs with skin and other soft tissues).

According to AIS, severe damage in each of these areas corresponds to a score of 5 points. Regarding the AIS scale, each injury is classified depending on the damage in any of the specified areas of the body, as well as by severity (1 — minor; 2 — moderate; 3 — significant, but not life-threatening; 4 — severe, life-threatening; 5 — critical, survival is doubtful; injuries with a score of 6 points are incompatible

112

with life: aortic rupture). It is recommended to pay special attention to injured with ISS scores greater than 30 points, as having a severe injury with a risk to life.

When a victim with polytrauma is admitted to the hospital, the severity of the injury is first assessed on the AIS scale from 1 to 5 points in six anatomical areas (Table 4). Then the worst 3 indicators of the most severely damaged areas are selected from the 6 indicated (although there may be additional damage in 1–3 more areas of the body).

 

 

Table 4

ISS damage severity scale

 

 

 

 

 

Type of damage

Points AIS

Points ISS

 

 

 

Traumatic brain injury

 

 

 

 

 

Multiple oneand bilateral facial fractures skeleton

3

9

 

 

 

Concussion

1

1

 

 

 

Brain contusion

3

9

 

 

 

Severe brain contusion

4

16

 

 

 

Intracranial hematoma

5

25

 

 

 

Spinal fractures

 

 

 

 

 

Uncomplicated, single

2

4

 

 

 

Multiple

3

9

 

 

 

Complicated (except upper cervical)

4

16

 

 

 

Complicated upper cervical with severe impairment vital functions

5

25

 

 

 

Breast injury

 

 

 

 

 

Clavicle fracture

2

4

 

 

 

Fracture of the sternum

2

4

 

 

 

Scapular fracture

2

4

 

 

 

Rib fracture (NMT 3)

2

2

 

 

 

Breast injury

 

 

 

 

 

Multiple rib fractures

3

9

 

 

 

Lung contusion

3

9

 

 

 

Rupture of the lung

3

9

 

 

 

Rupture of the lung with a tense pneumohemothorax

3

9

 

 

 

Bruising of the heart

4

16

 

 

 

Through wound to the heart

5

25

 

 

 

Rupture of the trachea or major bronchi

5

25

 

 

 

Aortic rupture

6

75

 

 

 

113

3.4. POLYTRAUMA SEVERITY SCALE (PTS)

Employees of the Medical Graduate School in Hannover in 1983 proposed their Polytrauma severity scale, or Hannovischer Polytrauma schlüssel — PTS, in 1985 it was supplemented (Table 5) [1, 9] and use it in their practice.

Table 5

Hanover polytrauma severity scale (PTS)

PTS (skull)

PTS (chest)

 

 

Traumatic brain injury mild — 4

Fracture of the sternum, 1–3 ribs — 2

Rib fractures on one side — 5

Traumatic brain injury medium degree — 8

Bilateral rib fracture — 10

Traumatic brain injury severe — 12

Hemopneumothorax — 2

Fracture of the bones of the central part

Lung contusion — 7

persons — 2

Bilateral lung injury — 9

Severe fracture of the bones of the central parts

Unstable chest — 3

of the face — 4

Aortic rupture — 7

 

PTS (abdomen)

PTS (pelvis)

 

 

Splenic rupture — 9

Simple pelvic fracture — 3

Combined pelvic fracture — 9

Rupture of spleen and liver — 18

Pelvis and genitourinary system — 12

Multiple liver ruptures, intestines, mesentery,

Vertebral fracture — 3

kidneys — 18

Horizontal vertebral fracture — 3

Pancreatic rupture — 9

Pelvic soft tissue reproduction — 15

 

 

 

PTS (limbs)

 

 

“Central” fracture-dislocation in the hip

Shoulder fracture — 4

joint — 12

Ulnar vascular injury and knee joints — 8

Simple hip fracture (transverse, oblique) — 8

Vascular injury distal to the ulnar and knee

Split hip fracture — 12

joints — 4

Fracture of the lower leg — 4

Hip, shoulder amputation — 12

Knee ligament rupture — 2

Amputation of the forearm, lower leg — 8

Patellar fracture — 2

Severe open fracture — 4

Fracture of the forearm, in the elbow, ankle

Large contusion/soft tissue reproduction — 2

joints — 2

 

 

 

3.5. MAINZ EMERGENCY EVALUATION SCORE

The Mainz emergency score is a dynamic system for assessing the effectiveness of prehospital emergency care in adult patients (Table 6). The scale is not in-

114

tended for prognostic assessments, but is a good tool for assessing the effectiveness and quality of prehospital medical care.

Evaluated parameters:

1.Glasgow scale score.

2.Heart rate.

3.BH.

4.Heart rate.

5.Pain.

6.BP.

7.SpO2.

The MEES assessment is based on the following principles (Table 7).

Table 6

Mainz emergency assessment scale

Parameter

Values

Points

 

 

 

 

15

4

 

 

 

 

12–14

3

Glasgow scale score

 

 

8–11

2

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 7

1

 

 

 

 

≤ 39

1

 

 

 

 

40–49

2

 

 

 

 

50–59

3

 

 

 

HR, bpm

60–100

4

 

 

 

 

101–130

3

 

 

 

 

131–160

2

 

 

 

 

≥ 161

1

 

 

 

 

≤ 4

1

 

 

 

 

5–7

2

 

 

 

 

8–11

3

BD, respiratory movements

 

 

12–18

4

per minute

 

 

19–24

3

 

 

 

 

 

25–30

2

 

 

 

 

≥ 31

1

 

 

 

115

Parameter

Values

Points

 

 

 

 

Sinus rhythm.

4

 

 

 

 

Supraventricular extrasystole.

 

 

Isolated ventricular

3

 

extrasystoles

 

 

 

 

Heart rhythm

Multiple ventricular

 

extrasystoles.

2

 

 

Atrial fibrillation*

 

 

 

 

 

Ventricular tachycardia.

 

 

Ventricular fibrillation.

1

 

Asystolia

 

 

 

 

 

No

4

 

 

 

 

Moderate

3

Pain

 

 

Strong

2

 

 

 

 

 

Intolerable

1

 

 

 

 

≤ 79/59

1

 

 

 

 

80/60–99/69

2

 

 

 

 

100/70–119/79

3

 

 

 

BP, mmHg

120/80–140/90

4

 

 

 

 

141/91–159/94

3

 

 

 

 

160/95–229/119

2

 

 

 

 

≥ 230/120

1

 

 

 

 

96–100

4

 

 

 

 

91–95

3

SpO2, %

 

 

86–90

2

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 85

1

 

 

 

Note: * The original scale uses the term “absolute arrhythmia” and/or the abbreviation ABSARRH.

Table 7

Mainz emergency assessment scale

Parameter deviation level

Points

 

 

Physiological value, normal

4

 

 

Moderate deviation

3

 

 

Significant deviation

2

 

 

Life-threatening deviation

1

 

 

116

MEES score is equal to the sum of the points for all 7 parameters. Interpretation: the minimum score on the scale is 7 points (the authors of the scale believe that the minimum score is 8 points); the maximum score on the scale is 28 points. The higher the score on the scale, the better the patient's condition.

It is recommended to evaluate the scale twice at the initial stage: first at the prehospital stage during the initial examination of the patient, and then in the emergency room or ICU. If the results of the second MEES assessment are ≥ 2 points compared to the initial assessment, then the patient's condition has improved. If the assessment results decrease by ≤ 2 points, then the patient's condition has worsened. If the scores fluctuate within the range of ±1, the patient's condition is considered unchanged. The MEES scale was subsequently modified. The essence of the modification was to combine the original MEES with capnometry. The new scale is called MEESc. It has more broad capabilities and is recommended for use both at the prehospital and hospital stages.

3.6. CINCINNATI PREHOSPITAL STROKE SCALE (CPSS)

The Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale (CPSS) is used as a prehospital stroke assessment. It is an abbreviated and simplified version of the NIH stroke scale.

The scale includes three items. It can be used by both physicians and emergency medical personnel to identify patients with stroke, and also serve as an assessment test for the selection of candidates for thrombolysis.

Detection of pathology on any of these points with high sensitivity (66 %) and specificity (87 %) indicates the presence of a stroke in the patient.

Prediction of the risk of cerebral stroke in patients with transient ischemic attacks. The ABCD Score is used to predict the risk of stroke during the first 7 days after a transient ischemic attack.

According to research results, when assessed on the ABCD scale from 0 to 4 points, the seven-day risk of developing a stroke is 0.4 %, 5 points — 2.1 %, 6 points — 31.4 %.

The ABCD score can be used in routine clinical practice to identify individuals at high risk who require urgent evaluation and treatment. Scales and tests for studying cognitive functions.

3.7. QSOFA SEPSIS CRITERIA

The following criteria for sepsis are distinguished:

systemic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg;

respiratory rate ≥ 22 per minute;

any disturbance of consciousness (< 14 points on the Glasgow coma scale).

117

If there are ≥ 2 points, as well as signs of infection, it is necessary to pay attention to this patient and assess the likelihood of sepsis using the expanded SOFA scale. This scale has a specificity of 96 % and a sensitivity of 30 % for determining organ dysfunction, and a specificity of 91 % and a sensitivity of 50 % for determining mortality. Compared to the criteria for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), this scale has greater specificity, but less sensitivity.

After screening and if there is a qSOFA score of ≥ 2 or the suspicion of sepsis remains, an expanded SOFA score is assessed.

3.8. QSOFA CRITERIA FOR SEPTIC SHOCK

The following criteria of septic shock are distinguished:

persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain a mean BP ≥ ≥ 65 mmHg;

lactate > 2 mmol/L despite adequate infusion therapy.

If these criteria are met, the probability of in-hospital death exceeds 40 %.

The SOFA criteria include the definition of functions:

breathing: PaO2/FiO2 ratio;

coagulation: platelet count;

liver: bilirubin level;

cardiovascular system: level of blood pressure and inotropic support;

CNS: determination of level according to the Glasgow coma scale;

kidneys: creatinine level and urine output.

If there are ≥ 2 points on the expanded SOFA scale, sepsis is eligible.

After the diagnosis is made, initial intensive therapy is carried out, an important part of which is a massive infusion, then the mean arterial pressure (MAP) is determined, as well as the lactate level. Mean arterial pressure is determined by the formula: MAP – SBP – DBP + 1/3DBP, where SBP is systolic blood pressure, and DBP is diastolic blood pressure. If the use of vasopressors is necessary to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure (≥ 65 mmHg), as well as high lactate levels (> 2 mmol/L), a diagnosis of septic shock is made.

3.9. SIRS/SIRS SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY

RESPONSE SYNDROME SCALE

Body temperature: more than 38 °C or less than 36 °C.

Heart rate: more than 90 per minute.

118

Tachypnea: develops either when the respiratory rate is more than 20 bpm, or when PaCO2 is less than 32 mmHg.

Leukocytes: more than 12 000 cells/mm3, or less than 4 000 cells/mm3, or more than 10 % immature forms of neutrophils.

Table 8

Assessment scale of the condition of patients and injured (E.P. Izmailov, I.G. Trukhanova (2019))

 

 

 

Indicators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consciousness

 

 

 

Test

Frequency

 

State

Frequency

 

Arterial

breath

Points

(on scale

 

fillings

 

pulse

 

pressure

and pulse

 

 

Glasgow)

 

capillaries

 

 

 

 

 

oximetry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal, up

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

to 20 per

 

 

Norm

Norm

 

Normal, 3 s

minute.

Up

Satisfactory

 

100 mmHg

(1 point)

(1 point)

 

(1 point)

PO2 more

to 5

 

 

(1 point)

 

 

 

 

 

than 94 %

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1 point)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increased by

 

 

 

 

 

20 % re-

 

20 % per

 

 

 

 

 

 

minute,

 

 

 

Raised

 

duction

 

 

 

 

 

Slow-

more than

 

 

 

by 20 %,

 

from base-

 

 

Norm

 

motion,

21–29, per

Up

Moderate

100 per mi-

 

line, not

(1 point)

 

4–7 s

minute, gra-

to 10

 

nute

 

less than

 

 

 

(2 points)

de I ODN,

 

 

 

(2 points)

 

90 mmHg

 

 

 

 

 

PO2 up to

 

 

 

 

 

(2 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

90 %

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30 % re-

 

Learned on

 

 

 

 

 

 

30 % per

 

 

 

 

 

duction

 

 

 

 

Raised

 

 

minute,

 

 

 

 

from base-

 

 

 

 

30 %,

 

 

30–35 per

 

 

Sopor

 

line,

8–14 s

Up

Heavy

100–120

 

minute, gra-

(3 points)

 

not lower

(3 points)

to 15

 

per minute

 

de II ODN,

 

 

 

than

 

 

 

 

(3 points)

 

 

PO2 up to

 

 

 

 

80 mmHg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

80 %

 

 

 

 

 

(3 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

119

 

 

 

Indicators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consciousness

 

 

 

Test

Frequency

 

State

Frequency

 

Arterial

breath

Points

(on scale

 

fillings

 

pulse

 

pressure

and pulse

 

 

Glasgow)

 

capillaries

 

 

 

 

 

oximetry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increased by

 

 

 

Learned on

 

 

 

40 %, more

 

40 % re-

 

40 % per

 

 

Coma moderate

than 120 per

 

duction

Very slow-

minute,

 

 

minute, de-

 

from base-

motion,

36–45 per

 

 

(3 points)

 

Up

Critical

termined

 

line, not

more than

minute, gra-

or deep

 

to 20

 

on large ar-

 

lower than

15 s

de III ODN,

 

(4 points)

 

 

 

teries, ar-

 

70 mmHg

(4 points)

PO2 less than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

rhythmia

 

(4 points)

 

70 %

 

 

 

(4 points)

 

 

 

(4 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increased by

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50 %, more

 

Reduction

 

Coma,

 

 

 

than 150 per

 

 

pathological

 

 

 

 

of more

No padding

 

 

 

minute, de-

 

breathing

 

 

 

 

than 50 %

(5 points),

 

 

Coma terminal

termined on

 

(Cheyne —

Over

Agonal

 

from base-

preagonal

(5 points)

large ves-

 

Stokes, Bio-

20

 

 

line, below

or agonal

 

 

sels, ar-

 

ta), PO2 less

 

 

 

 

70 mmHg

state

 

 

 

rhythmia,

 

than 50 %

 

 

 

 

(5 points)

 

 

 

 

bradycardia

 

 

(5 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5 points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: the estimated scores of the indicator are shown in parentheses.

The scale turned out to be useful not only in providing emergency care at the prehospital stage, but also in assessing the condition of patients and injured at the hospital stage (Table 8).

3.10. CLOCK DRAWING TEST

TO ASSESS THE PATIENT'S MENTAL STATE

The simplicity and high information content of this test, including for mild dementia, makes it one of the most commonly used tools for diagnosing the clinical syndrome. The test is carried out as follows. The patient is given a blank sheet of unlined paper and a pencil. Instructions are given: Please draw a round clock with numbers on the dial so that the clock hands show fifteen minutes to two. The patient must independently draw a circle, put all 12 numbers in the correct places and draw arrows pointing to the correct positions. Normally, this task never causes difficulties. If er-

120

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]