- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section THREE Hydrogel and silicone hydrogel fitting
•Excessive movement on blinking (over 0.75 mm).
•Excessive lag on lateral or upwards eye movements (over 1.5 mm).
• Poor centration.
•Poor comfort because of lid sensation.
•Visual acuity variable.
•Retinoscopy reflex clear centrally with peripheral distortion.
•Variable vision.
•Refraction variable because of lens movement.
•Keratometer mires vary with lens movement, giving peripheral distortion.
• Buckling of lens edge.
16.4 Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
The general fitting characteristics for soft lenses are summarized in Table 16.1. Each lens type and lens make is likely to have its own individual fitting characteristics, depending upon its material, water content, total diameter, method of manufacture and the various other points discussed in Chapter 15 on ‘Soft lens fitting and design’ and Chapter 17 on ‘Other soft lens fitting considerations’. Table 16.1 is therefore intended to give an overview of the general fitting char-
acteristics which the contact lens practitioner may expect to find.
202
|
|
Section |
|
|
Hydrogel and silicone hydrogel fitting |
THREE |
|
|
Other soft lens |
CHAPTER |
|
|
fitting |
17 |
|
|
considerations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
Lens power |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity |
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.3 |
Additional visual considerations |
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.4 |
Thin lenses |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
Aspheric lenses |
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.6 |
Spun-cast lenses |
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
Unusual lens performance |
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 Lens power
Power is an important consideration in deciding which type of lens to fit, particularly with new patients.
Low minus (<−2.00 D)
•Thin lenses should be avoided because of handling difficulties and the greater chance of dehydration.
•A thicker silicone hydrogel, or medium to high water content hydrogel should be selected.
High minus (>−6.00 D) and medium to high plus (>+3.00 D)
•Silicone hydrogels are the likely first choice to avoid any physiological problems.
•Low water content hydrogels should be avoided because of their greater thickness and low Dks.
•Larger diameter (semi-scleral) lenses usually give better stability of fitting.
©2010 Elsevier Ltd, Inc, BV
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7590-1.00011-X
Section THREE Hydrogel and silicone hydrogel fitting
Medium minus (−2.00 D to −6.00 D) and low plus (<+3.00 D)
•Silicone hydrogels are the likely first choice.
•High water content or thin hydrogels are also possible, except where problems arise with fitting characteristics, dehydration or visual acuity.
17.2 Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
An important influence on the fitting characteristics of all lenses is the flexibility of the material. This explains why two lenses of apparently the same specification but different material can behave in entirely different ways on the cornea.1 The original Permalens, for example, which is very flexible, was often required to be fitted steeper than ‘K’ compared with other more rigid materials where the more usual flatter than ‘K’ approach is correct. Similarly, moulded or spun-cast lenses with a thin overall cross-section and inherently greater flexibility than their lathed counterparts lend themselves better to a ‘one-fit’ fitting philosophy which relies on draping the cornea.
Another important influence on the fitting characteristics of all lenses is the modulus of elasticity of the material (see Table 19.1). This defines a material’s relative stiffness which has a strong influence on lens fit. Materials with a high modulus are generally much easier to handle but are more likely to cause arcuate staining (see Section 19.5.1). Materials with a low modulus, in addition to handling difficulties because of their flexibility, may well show less movement together with greater decentration on the eye. Variations in modulus of elasticity can also give a large difference in sagittal depth which, in turn, affects the fitting characteristics.
PRACTICAL ADVICE
•Because of flexibility and manufacturing considerations, the lenses from one laboratory cannot necessarily be duplicated by another merely by ordering the same nominal specification.
•Fitting should be carried out with trial lenses of the type to be ordered to ensure optimum reliability.
•For conventional lenses, this is no longer feasible with current regulations but many laboratories will now supply prescription lenses on an exchange basis.
•With disposables, lenses can be taken from a fitting bank or trial lenses ordered from the laboratory.
17.3 Additional visual considerations
Flexure and liquid lens power
Flexure occurs when a soft lens fitted flatter or steeper than ‘K’ bends to follow the corneal curvature. The refractive effect with both plus and minus lenses is to add negative power.2,3
204
Other soft lens fitting considerations 17 Chapter 
A liquid lens occurs if the posterior surface of the soft lens fails to conform to the front surface of the cornea.4 This is more likely to be present with semi-scleral designs, whereas there is virtually no liquid lens with ultrathin lenses which completely drape the cornea.
PRACTICAL ADVICE
•Any discrepancy between contact lens and spectacle Rx (allowing for vertex distance) is caused mainly by flexure but possibly by liquid lens power.
•This is unlikely to be greater than 0.50 D with a satisfactory fitting.
•Thin corneal lenses require more minus power than thick semi-scleral lenses.
Astigmatism
The usual limit for acceptable acuity with a thin spherical lens is about 0.75 DC, but it can be as little as 0.50 DC for critical observers or patients with large pupils. Occasionally, acceptable vision is obtained with much higher cylinders but with the wide range of conventional and disposable torics now available, these should be considered for astigmatism from 0.75 D upwards. With an amblyopic eye, however, there may be no advantage in the additional complexity and cost of a toric lens.
Soft lenses are generally fitted flatter than ‘K’ so that less minus is required compared with the best vision sphere used with rigid lenses.
Example:
Spectacle Rx −3.50/−1.00 × 180
Likely BVP of spherical soft lens −3.50 D.
Wavefront technology and ocular aberrations
Some varieties of soft lens (e.g. Purevision from Bausch & Lomb; Definitions from VeniVidi) employ a similar approach to that used in laser surgery where wavefront technology can improve the potential visual acuity with aberration control. Soft lenses are manufactured to incorporate spherical aberration to neutralize the average value of the human eye. It is claimed that such lenses can also give improved acuity with low levels of astigmatism, e.g. Frequency 55 Aspheric.
Environmental factors
The power of a soft lens depends on its basic dimensions of radius, diameter, thickness and refractive index which can all vary with environmental factors. These include ocular effects such as temperature, pH, tonicity and volume of tears. Some of these are in turn influenced by external factors such as ambient temperature, humidity, or the degree of lens hydration when placed on the eye. Generally, high water content hydrogel materials undergo larger changes and give greater variation in vision than HEMA or silicone hydrogels.
205
