- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
The BOZR range is 7.00–8.60 mm in 0.05 mm steps over TDs of 9.60 and 10.20 mm. The BOZD is 5.00 mm for each diameter and the centre thickness at −3.00 D is 0.135 mm. The Astrocon is the basis of a front surface multifocal design.
MetrO2 (Cantor & Nissel)
A computer generated constant axial edge lift design with a back surface aspheric and front surface bicurve design. The incremental design results in a progression from a BOZR of 7.00 mm with a TD of 8.80 mm to a BOZR of 8.70 mm with a TD of 10.50 mm.
12.3 Principles of fitting
12.3.1 Fully aspheric lenses
Progressive eccentric aspheric lenses (e.g. Quasar) are generally fitted on flattest ‘K’. The fluorescein pattern shows no obvious area of bearing over the central and mid-peripheral area while the lens edge gives a well-defined tears meniscus. The lens position should be central with 1.5–2 mm of movement on blinking. If the TD needs to be ordered larger (10.00 mm) or smaller (9.20 mm) than the 9.60 mm diagnostic lenses, there is no need to change either the BOZR or BVP.
With toric corneas, the central radius is chosen 0.10 mm steeper than flattest ‘K’. The lens should still give good centration but will show greater peripheral clearance along the vertical rather than horizontal meridian. Mid-peripheral bearing indicates the need for a flatter lens, whereas hard central touch or decentration requires a steeper fitting.
12.3.2 Mainly aspheric/part sphere
Persecon E
The Persecon E design is manufactured from CAB (see Section 7.1). It is fitted slightly flatter than flattest ‘K’. The total diameter is chosen according to corneal size: 8.80 mm or 9.30 mm for corneas up to 11.0 mm, and 9.80 mm or 10.30 mm for those larger than 11.0 mm.
A correct fitting shows alignment or the suggestion of light central touch. In the case of decentration, a larger lens should be tried before steepening the curvature. The edge bevel is cut with a common tangent to the ellipse to give good comfort.
Aquila and Persecon 92E
Aquila and Persecon 92E are fitted at least 0.05 mm flatter than flattest ‘K’. The fluorescein fit is alignment to slightly flat with a small degree of edge clearance.
156
Aspheric lenses 12 Chapter 
As the elliptical base curve flattens towards the edge of the lens in the same way as the cornea, the TD can be altered without causing any change to the fluorescein pattern. However, if the base curve is altered, the BVP requires compensation in the usual way.
PRACTICAL ADVICE
The design of the Aquila and Persecon 92E differs from the earlier Persecon E so that the correct diagnostic set must be used to achieve an optimum fitting.
12.3.3 Mainly spherical/part asphere
These designs, with a spherical back optic and aspheric periphery (e.g. Menicon EX), require a relatively flat fitting. For a spherical cornea, the initial lens is 0.05 mm flatter than flattest ‘K’. As the corneal astigmatism increases, the first lens is selected along flattest ‘K’. If there is greater than 2.00 D of corneal astigmatism, the fitting should be 0.05 mm steeper than flattest ‘K’.
Quantum
Quantum (Bausch & Lomb) is a typical example of a design that has a small spherical cap with an aspheric periphery. It is therefore fitted differently. The spherical central radius is selected 0.10 mm steeper than flattest ‘K’ to allow the aspheric mid-peripheral portion to align with the cornea. The fluorescein pattern gives slight central pooling surrounded by an area of alignment with peripheral edge clearance. The lens design can give excessive edge clearance with steep corneas and too little clearance with flat corneas. Quantum does not ride as high as some of the flatter fitting designs and is useful where it is desirable to avoid lid attachment. The usual total diameter is 9.60 mm. To help centration, 10.20 mm lenses are available, but even 9.60 mm is too large for some small corneas. Only plus lenses are available in a 9.00 mm diameter.
Metro2 and Maxim Ultra
The initial trial lens is chosen on flattest ‘K’ or slightly steeper for up to 1.00 D of corneal astigmatism. This should maintain the appearance of alignment over the central area of the lens with gradually increasing clearance in the periphery. With greater than 1.00 D of astigmatism, the BOZR is selected 0.10–0.15 mm steeper than ‘K’. The lens should centre with 1–1.5 mm of movement on blinking.
Astrocon HDS
The first lens is chosen 0.10 mm steeper than ‘K’ for cylinders up to 0.75 D, on ‘K’ for up to 1.75 DC and 0.10 mm flatter than ‘K’ for up to 2.50 DC. Movement should be between 1.0 and 2.0 mm. The fluorescein picture should show alignment or minimal apical clearance. There should also be slight mid-peripheral
157
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
bearing and 0.10–0.12 mm of edge clearance. If the initial fit appears flat, the 0.45 ‘e’ value option should be tried and, if steep, the 0.75.
12.3.4 General fitting considerations
Aspheric lenses
•Do not require such critical fitting because there are fewer parameters.
•Need to be fitted slightly flat to give adequate movement and sufficient edge clearance (except designs like Quantum).
•Flat fitting, however, tends to give decentration as a common problem.
•The variations in design mean that the manufacturer’s information should be read before fitting.
Spherical cornea
The ideal fit is alignment or slightly flatter than alignment.3 A slightly flat fit gives light central touch, but because of even pressure distribution any stress to the cornea is kept to a minimum.
A flat fit shows hard central touch surrounded by an excessive annulus of fluorescein. There is increased lid sensation and unstable vision.
A steep fit gives excessive central pooling with a sharp border, surrounded by a peripheral ring of hard touch and a very narrow meniscus of fluorescein at the periphery.
Toric cornea
The ideal fit is also alignment or slightly flatter than flattest ‘K’ to minimize lens flexure and maintain good acuity.
12.4 Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
•A much more gradual change in the fluorescein pattern from centre to periphery.
•True alignment can be achieved if the correct eccentricity has been assessed, as the p value of the lens and cornea can be chosen to be the same (e.g. using a videokeratoscope).
•The peripheral tear layer thickness increases more gradually towards the edge.
•Larger lenses have to be used to help centration.
PRACTICAL ADVICE
The axial edge lift of an aspheric lens is less than with the equivalent multicurve. It is sometimes possible to fit higher degrees of astigmatism because of the reduced edge stand-off in the steeper meridian.
158
Aspheric lenses 12 Chapter 
References
1.Bibby M. Computer assisted photokeratoscopy and contact lens design. Optician 1976;171(4423):37–43, 171(4424), 11–17, 171(4425), 15–17.
2.Meyler J, Ruston D. The development of a new aspheric RGP contact lens. Optician 1995;209(5487):30–8.
3.Morris J. RGP lenses Part 2 – Fitting procedures. Optician 2004;228(5976):28–35.
159
This page intentionally left blank
