- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section ONE Preliminaries
1.2.7 Cell apoptosis
Under normal conditions, the shedding of cells affects 1% of those along the epithelial surface. In contact lens wear, fewer cells are shed and the highest incidence is at the centre of the cornea. Hypoxia is known to be an important factor in inhibiting epithelial shedding which may explain the increased incidence of microbial keratitis in contact lens wearers.
1.2.8 Corneal sensitivity
One of the first, important effects of hypoxia, of which the patient is unaware, is a drop in corneal sensitivity.6 Reduced corneal sensitivity is most obvious when a long-term wearer of PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) is refitted with a rigid gas-permeable material. One of the side effects is a period of lens and foreign body awareness that has not been present before. This indicates a rise in corneal sensitivity which eventually settles to the expected norm with an increase in available oxygen.
1.2.9 Closed eyelid conditions during sleep
The following changes are induced:
•Increase in temperature.
•Hypotonic shift in tear osmolarity as a result of increased evaporation.
•Slight acidic shift in tear pH as a result of retardation of carbon dioxide efflux from the cornea.
•Corneal oxygenation reduced from 155 mmHg (open eye) to 55 mmHg (closed eye).
1.3 Physical properties of materials
1.3.1 Oxygen permeability, oxygen transmissibility and equivalent oxygen percentage
Oxygen permeability
The oxygen permeability of a material is generally referred to as the Dk. In this nomenclature, D is the diffusion coefficient – a measure of how fast dissolved molecules of oxygen move within the material – and k is a constant representing the solubility coefficient or the number of oxygen molecules dissolved in the material.
The Dk value is a physical property of a contact lens material and describes its intrinsic ability to transport oxygen. It is defined as:
the rate of oxygen flow under specified conditions through unit area of contact lens material of unit thickness when subjected to unit pressure differences.7
6
Background 1 Chapter 
Table 1.1 Comparison of Dk and Dk/t for traditional (Fatt) and ISO units
Material |
Dk |
|
t (mm) |
Dk/t |
|
|
Traditional |
ISO units |
|
Traditional |
ISO units |
|
(Fatt) units |
|
|
(Fatt) units |
|
38% WC |
9.5 |
7.13 |
0.06 |
15.83 |
11.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55% WC |
20 |
15 |
0.08 |
25.00 |
18.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70% WC |
35 |
26.25 |
0.15 |
23.33 |
17.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iotrafilcon B |
110.0 |
82.5 |
0.08 |
137.50 |
103.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senofilcon A |
103.0 |
77.25 |
0.07 |
147.14 |
110.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic RGP |
60 |
45 |
0.15 |
40.00 |
30.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Hough.9
It is not a function of the shape or thickness of the material sample, but varies with temperature. The higher the temperature, the greater the Dk.8 The traditional units are 10−11 cm2/s ml O2/ml × mmHg (usually referred to as Fatt units), now also known as barrers. They are often omitted for convenience. When the international standard (ISO) unit of pressure, the hectopascal, is used instead of mmHg the units of Dk are 10−11 cm2/s ml O2/ml hPa. To convert to ISO units multiply by 0.75 (Table 1.1):9 to convert from hPa to mmHg multiply by 1.33322.
Oxygen transmissibility
Oxygen transmissibility is referred to as Dk/t, with Fatt units of 10−9 cm/s ml O2/ ml × mmHg and ISO units of cm/s ml O2/ml hPa (see Table 1.1). Here, t is the thickness of the lens or sample of material, and D and k are as defined above.
The Dk/t for a particular lens under specified conditions defines the ability of the lens to allow oxygen to move from anterior to posterior surface. The value of t is generally an average lens thickness for powers between ±3.00 dioptres
(D). Outside of this range, it is necessary to apply a nomogram.10 Oxygen transmissibility is not a physical property of a contact lens material, but is a specific characteristic related to the sample thickness.
The methods employed to undertake measurement of oxygen permeability are:
•The polarographic method. Developed by Fatt during the 1970s for rigid and hydrogel materials – ISO 9913-1 (1996).
•The coulometric method. Developed by ISO during the 1990s for use with highly permeable non-hydrogel materials – ISO 9913-2 (2000).
Surface effects
High Dk materials do not always give the oxygen performance on the eye that would be expected from laboratory results. The corneal swelling is equivalent to
7
Section ONE Preliminaries
that of a lens with a Dk only 55% of the measured value.11 This barrier effect is due to an intermediate water layer used in measurement.
Edge effect
There is also an edge effect due to oxygen flow around the periphery of the sample, since, in the laboratory, flat as opposed to curved test pieces are generally used.12
Boundary effects
The boundary effect (or boundary layer effect) is important for rigid gas- permeable materials as there is resistance to oxygen permeation at the boundary between the tears and polymer surface when measurement is made under water/water conditions. For a clean lens, the boundary effect is constant whether the lens is thick or very thin. The effect therefore has a relatively greater influence on a thin lens. This means that a particular Dk/t value with a lens, for example, of thickness 0.35 mm will not be significantly improved compared with a thin 0.10 mm lens. For thin lenses, the boundary effect becomes more important in determining the dissolved oxygen permeability as the Dk of the material increases. There are virtually no boundary effect implications for PMMA and low Dk materials.
PRACTICAL ADVICE
Consistently reliable comparisons of various materials can be made only by the same person using the same instrument under identical conditions. Care is therefore required in comparing Dk measurements from different sources.13
Equivalent oxygen percentage
The equivalent oxygen percentage (EOP) refers to the level of oxygen at the surface of the cornea under a contact lens. For the uncovered cornea exposed to the atmosphere at sea level, the amount of oxygen available is 20.9%, whereas with the eye closed the cornea receives 8%. The EOP obviously varies with altitude. A particular value for a material is that oxygen percentage on a scale of 0 to 21 which, in a goggle experiment, produces an oxygen demand after steady state has been reached, equivalent to that produced by a test contact lens worn for the same period of time. With lens wear, to avoid oedema, the EOP should be over 10%14 (Dk/t = 24.1); for no overnight swelling it needs to be as high as 18% (Dk/t = 87). All EOPs are lens thickness dependent. An EOP profile (Figure 1.1) for a lens of known material and thickness shows whether it can provide enough oxygen to avoid corneal oedema.
Oxygen flux
•Is a measure of the actual amount of oxygen available to the corneal epithelium.
8
Background 1 Chapter 
•Is expressed in l O2/cm2/h.
•Decreases with contact lens thickness and hydration.
•Requires the tear pump mechanism to make up any deficiencies.
•There is a rapid increase in oxygen flux with increasing Dk/t. However, as Dk/t continues to increase, a gradual levelling off of oxygen flux occurs at a Dk/t of approximately 30 Fatt units for the open eye and 80 Fatt units for the closed eye. This means that increases in Dk/t beyond certain values have less impact in terms of oxygen utilization.
•With the advent of silicone hydrogel materials, the large differences in critical Dk values published for various studies are in reality small when using oxygen flux values instead of Dk. Different studies are in general agreement as to the minimum oxygen requirements in terms of flux values (Table 1.2).
Oxygen
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sleep |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hg |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
- |
5 |
- |
|
4 |
- |
|
3 |
- |
|
2 |
- |
|
1 |
C |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Human EOP, calculated from Dk/t
Percentage oxygen contributed by the tear pump
Custom Sperical RGP : 7.80 : 9.50 : -4.25 Material: Paragon HDS 100
Tear pump contribution = 2.00%
Figure 1.1 Equivalent oxygen percentage profile
Table 1.2 Differences in critical Dk values
compared to oxygen flux
Dk/t |
Oxygen flux |
87 |
5.57 |
|
|
89 |
5.58 |
|
|
125 |
5.73 |
|
|
300 |
5.94 |
|
|
9
Section ONE Preliminaries
1.3.2 Water content and water uptake
The water content is the amount of fluid taken up by a lens material as a percentage of the whole under specified conditions:
Water content (%) =
Wt of fully hydrated lens − Wt of fully dehydrated lens Wt of fully hydrated lens
Water uptake (%) =
Wt of fully hydrated lens − Wt of fully dehydrated lens Wt of fully dehydrated lens
×100
×100
Water is lost by evaporation when a hydrogel lens is worn on the eye. This is in part caused by a rise in temperature and is accompanied by a tightening of the fit (see Section 21.4.2).
Water balance ratio
This represents the water retention capability of a lens material (Table 1.3).
Water balance ratio = |
Time to dehydrate 10% |
|
|
Time to rehydrate from 90% saturation |
A high ratio indicates a material with stable hydration characteristics.
Table 1.3 Comparison of water balance ratios
Material |
Water content |
Water balance ratio |
Polymacon p-hema |
38 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
Crofilcon PMMA/CMA |
38 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
Omnafilcon p-hema/PC |
58 |
1.5 |
|
|
|
Hioxifilcon A |
59 |
5.5 |
|
|
|
Filcon 5 |
75 |
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.3.3 Wettability
Wettability is the ability of a drop of liquid to adhere to a solid surface. The lower the cohesive forces within a liquid, the greater the attraction between the fluid and surface. Thus, superior wettability enhances the spread of liquid over a surface.
Contact angle is a measure of the hydrophilicity of a surface. The contact angle may be measured in a variety of ways:
10
Background 1 Chapter 
Saline |
A |
B 
Material
Figure 1.2 Sessile drop method (A, advancing angle; B, receding angle)
|
|
Liquid |
|
|
|
|
Liquid |
|
||||
Material |
|
|
θ |
|
|
Material |
|
|
θ |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wettability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increasing |
|
|
|
Decreasing |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
smaller angle |
|
|
|
|
larger angle |
|
|||
Figure 1.3 Surface wettability |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Table 1.4 Wetting angles |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Material |
Captive bubble* |
Sessile drop |
Direct meniscus |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receding angle |
PMMA |
– |
67.3 |
|
11 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CAB |
20 |
|
|
– |
– |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Boston ES |
52 |
|
|
– |
– |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Boston EO |
49 |
|
|
– |
– |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Millennium |
– |
53 |
|
|
|
– |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Optimum Classic |
– |
– |
12 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*From manufacturers’ details; PMMA, polymethyl methacrylate; CAB, cellulose acetate butyrate.
•Sessile drop method: measures the tangent to a drop of liquid placed on a sample surface (Figure 1.2).
•Captive bubble method: measures the tangent to an air bubble formed on the surface of an immersed sample.
•Wilhelmy balance method: a sample is immersed or withdrawn vertically from a liquid.15
•Direct meniscus method.15
Both the advancing and the receding angles are measured. These are formed when liquid is added to or removed from the controlled liquid drop used for measurement (see Figure 1.2).
The lower the contact angle, the more wettable the surface (Figure 1.3). Typical values are given in Table 1.4, which demonstrates the great inconsistency between different methods. Comparisons can therefore only be made when the same method has been employed.
11
