- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
•Percon lens (1969)6 – fitted to give central alignment with peripheral clearance, using a spherical BOZR and a conical peripheral zone with a constant axial lift of 0.10 mm. The cone angle is almost exactly tangential to give virtually no transition. Example: 7.80:6.80/9.00. Cone angle 130°.
•Offset lens (1966)7 – with the centre of curvature of the back peripheral curve offset to the opposite side of the central axis, virtually eliminating any transition. It has been termed a continuous bicurve lens2 or contralateral offset. A homolateral offset is also possible, where the centre of curvature of the peripheral curve is displaced to the same side of the
central axis. The degree of flattening is referred to as the axial edge lift, Z value or flattening factor. Example: 7.00:6.00 AEL 0.1 at 9.00 −5.00.
9.1.2 Early aspheric designs
Nissel aspheric
The Nissel design (1967)8 was based on the US Volk lens. It had a central aspheric portion with a 7.80 mm diameter, two spherical zones at diameters of 8.40 mm and 8.80 mm, and an 0.50 mm wide bevel of radius 10.00–12.00 mm to assist tear flow. It was fitted 0.10 mm steeper than ‘K’ to give central alignment with the appearance of a multicurve.
Conflex (Wohlk, 1982)
Moulded from Anduran material (CAB + ethyl vinyl acetate), this lens consists of a spherical optic with three aspheric peripheral zones. The edge shape is termed ‘ski-tip’. The lens is fitted 2.00 mm less than the horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) to give central alignment, or just flatter than ‘K’ with slight superior decentration.
TD |
= 9.40 mm, 9.90 mm, 10.20 mm |
BOZR |
= ‘K’ + 0.00–0.10 mm |
Aspheric periphery ≡ 0.80 mm, 1.60 mm, 3.50 mm flatter than BOZR
Conflex air (Wohlk, 1989)
A fully aspheric design in a fluoropolymer material, fitted with central alignment.
TD |
= 9.30 mm, 9.80 mm, 10.30 mm |
BOZR |
= 7.20–8.60 mm |
Aspheric periphery e = 0.4
9.2 Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
Corneal lenses are now designed with one or more peripheral zones which are deliberately intended to lift away from the cornea. Most modern spherical lenses are based on these designs.
124
Development of rigid lens design 9 Chapter 
Bicurve (C2)
Consists of a central radius and one flatter peripheral curve (Figure 9.1). There is a sharp transition between the two curves.
Example: 7.80:7.00/8.70:9.00 (Figure 9.2).
ØT
Ø0
r0
Sharp transition
r1
Figure 9.1 Bicurve corneal lens (ØT, total diameter; Ø0, back optic zone diameter; r0, back optic zone radius; r1, first back peripheral radius)
Figure 9.2 Tear layer profile/bicurve (C2)
125
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
Tricurve (C3)
Consists of a central radius and two flatter peripheral curves (Figure 9.3). It is the basic design of most modern rigid lenses, where the final curve is much flatter than first peripheral radius.
Example: 7.80:7.80/ 8.50:8.70/10.50:9.50 (Figure 9.4).
ØT
Ø1 Ø0
r0
r1
r2
Figure 9.3 Tricurve corneal lens (ØT, total diameter; Ø1, first back peripheral zone diameter; Ø0, back optic zone diameter; r0, back optic zone radius; r1, first back peripheral radius; r2, second back peripheral radius) (from Phillips and Stone, Contact Lenses, 3rd edn, ButterworthHeinemann, Oxford, by permission)
Multicurve
Consists of a central radius and three or more peripheral curves (Figure 9.5). It follows the flattening of cornea better than bicurves and tricurves and, when the transitions are well blended, behaves like a continuous curve lens.
Example: 7.80:7.50/8.40:8.20/9.00:8.90/11.50:9.50 (Figure 9.6).
Constant axial edge lift
CAEL lenses9 were developed as a further refinement of multicurve lens design to give a constant linear clearance between the edge of the lens and the cornea over the whole range of radii for a given diameter. The axial edge lift of the peripheral curves is calculated to remain constant for all BOZRs, unlike conventional lenses where the calculated AEL is greater with steeper lenses than with flatter lenses.
N.B. AEL relates to the lens design off the eye.
Average CAEL for a TD of 8.60 mm; 0.105 mm. Average CAEL for a TD of 9.20 mm; 0.11 mm. Average CAEL for a TD of 9.60 mm; 0.14 mm.
126
Development of rigid lens design 9 Chapter 
Figure 9.4 Tear layer profile/tricurve (C3)
ØT
r0
r1 r2
r3
Figure 9.5 Multicurve corneal lens (r3, third back peripheral radius; other symbols as in Figure 9.1)
127
