- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
|
Section |
Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting |
TWO |
|
|
|
|
Principles of rigid |
CHAPTER |
lens design |
8 |
|
|
8.1 |
Basic principles of rigid lens design |
111 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
Forces controlling design |
111 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
Concept of edge lift |
116 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
Tear layer thickness |
119 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
Lid attachment lenses |
120 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
Interpalpebral lenses |
121 |
|
|
|
8.1Basic principles of rigid lens design
•Lenses may be spherical, aspheric or a combination of both.
•Most corneal lenses have a central zone which is fitted just apically clear or in alignment with the central cornea, combined with a much flatter peripheral zone which is designed to lift away from the cornea.
•Central alignment gives optimum acuity (see Section 10.2).
•Peripheral clearance is necessary for adequate tears exchange.
•The transition between the central portion and the periphery is sharp for a spherical bicurve design, becoming smoother as additional curves are added.
•Aspheric lenses have a much smoother transition and, for some designs, can be compared with very well-blended spherical multicurves (see Chapter 12).
8.2Forces controlling design
Corneal lenses of all materials are affected by a variety of forces when placed on the eye. These factors are both ocular (see Chapter 5) and physical in nature.1
8.2.1 Centre of gravity
•The centre of gravity of a lens lies somewhere behind the back surface (Figure 8.1).
©2010 Elsevier Ltd, Inc, BV
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7590-1.00011-X
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
C
C
A B
Figure 8.1 Centre of gravity (C) in (A) minus and (B) plus lenses
•It is affected by radius, diameter, thickness and power.
•Steep lenses have the centre of gravity further back than flat lenses and therefore give better centration (Figure 8.2A).
•Flat lenses have the centre of gravity further forward and give worse centration (Figure 8.2B).
•Large diameter lenses have the centre of gravity further back than small lenses and give better centration.
•Small lenses have the centre of gravity further forward and give worse centration.
C
C
A B
Figure 8.2 Centre of gravity (C) in (A) steep and (B) flat lenses
8.2.2 Frictional forces
The viscosity of the tear film maintains the lens in a stationary position by means of frictional forces. Thinning of the tear film or an increase in its aqueous content (e.g. during adaptation) reduces the centration ability of these forces.
112
Principles of rigid lens design 8 Chapter 
8.2.3 Capillary attraction
•The closer the lens matches the shape of the cornea, the greater the capillary attraction and stability.
•Since a rigid lens cannot ever exactly match the shape of the cornea, a balance has to be found between sufficient capillary attraction for lens stability and sufficient movement for tears exchange.
•An excessively flat fitting gives less capillary attraction and greater movement.
•A steep fitting can create a negative pressure or suction effect.
•The tears meniscus at the edge of the lens also provides forces for centration. The greater the meniscus, the better the adhesion.
8.2.4 Specific gravity
•The clinical significance is demonstrated when two lenses of the same design (and volume) but different specific gravity behave differently on the eye. The lens with the lower specific gravity has less weight (Table 8.1; see also Tables 7.3 and 7.4).
•A lens that drops because gravitational forces are greater than fluid forces may achieve better centration by using a material of lower specific gravity and vice versa.
•With prism ballast, a high specific gravity material is advantageous as it gives a greater difference in weight between the apex and base of the lens.
Table 8.1 Typical specific gravity values
Material |
Specific gravity |
Paragon HDS |
1.16 |
|
|
Optimum Classic |
1.189 |
|
|
Comfort O2 |
1.206 |
|
|
Boston XO |
1.27 |
|
|
Millennium |
1.467 |
|
|
8.2.5 Thickness and lenticulation
Thickness depends on back vertex power (BVP), design and material. Centre thickness (tc) and edge thickness (te) are both important (Tables 8.2 and 8.3).
•BVPs greater than −6.00 D or +4.00 D should be lenticulated to reduce excess thickness and mass.
•Lenticulation reduces thickness away from the centre for plus and towards the edge for minus lenses by making the front optic zone diameter (FOZD) smaller (Figure 8.3).
113
Section TWO Rigid gas-permeable lens fitting
•The FOZD should be approximately 0.50 mm larger than the back optic zone diameter (BOZD).
•The carrier portion of a lenticulated lens can be plano, negative or positive in shape (Figure 8.4). The choice depends upon the intended effect (e.g. lid attachment techniques) (see Section 8.5).
Table 8.2 Typical thickness values assuming a constant TD = 9.60 and
BOZD = 7.80 mm
BVP (D) |
tc (mm) |
te (mm) |
−10.00 |
0.13 |
0.25 |
|
|
|
−6.00 |
0.13 |
0.22 |
|
|
|
−3.00 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
|
|
|
−1.00 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
|
|
|
+1.00 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
|
|
|
+3.00 |
0.26 |
0.13 |
|
|
|
+6.00 |
0.34 |
0.15 |
|
|
|
+10.00 |
0.45 |
0.16 |
|
|
|
Table 8.3 Suggested minimum thicknesses for different materials (BVP
−3.00 D)
Material |
tc (mm) |
te (mm) |
PMMA |
0.10 |
0.12 |
|
|
|
CAB |
0.16 |
0.12 |
|
|
|
Silicon acrylate |
0.15 |
0.13 |
|
|
|
Fluorosiliconacrylate |
0.14 |
0.15 |
|
|
|
Optical zone
Negative carrier
Figure 8.3 Lenticulation of plus lens
114
Principles of rigid lens design 8 Chapter 
A B C
Figure 8.4 Carrier portion shapes of a lenticulated lens: (A) plano; (B) positive; (C) negative
8.2.6 Refractive index of materials
The following are typical examples of refractive index (see also Tables 7.3 and 7.4):
PMMA |
1.49 |
CAB |
1.47 |
Silicon acrylate |
1.466–1.48 |
Fluorosilicon acrylate |
1.414–1.53 |
Silicone |
1.43 |
•The higher the refractive index, the thinner the lens can be made.
•Modern rigid lenses have a lower refractive index than PMMA and are therefore thicker.
•High refractive index plastics are used for bifocal segments. They can incorporate fluorescent dye to assist fitting.
•The refractive index is important in toric lens fitting (see Chapter 22).
PRACTICAL ADVICE
Using a material with a high refractive index (e.g. 1.513 compared with 1.455) means that both high plus and minus lenses can be produced with reduced weight to improve their fitting characteristics.2
8.2.7 Edge shape
•Extremely important for comfort.
•Must be smooth and well finished.
•Should blend into the final peripheral curve.
•Can help lens removal.
115
