- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section ONE Preliminaries
6.6 Contact lens management
6.6.1 Hydrogel lenses
Hydrogels which may improve tolerance with dry eyes are:
•Bound water materials – contain less free water and lose their moisture content more slowly over time (eg Proclear (CooperVision), Benz GX).
•Thicker high water content lenses – give a stable tear film on their surface and encourage reflex tearing on blinking (e.g. Lunelle ES70 (CooperVision).
•Thin low water content lenses – have less free water to lose but as they
need to be very thin (tc: 0.06 mm) for physiological reasons do not promote a stable tear film on their surface so may exacerbate the dry eye problem if the patient has marginal dry eye (eg Hydron Zero 6, CooperVision).
•Lenses with an internal wetting agent:
•PVA is used for added wettability and comfort but leaches out during the course of the day (eg CIBA Dailies Aqua Comfort Plus, CIBAVision).
•Hydroclear Plus is the internal wetting agent in Acuvue Moist (Johnson & Johnson) which is not released during lens wear.
•Safegel 1 day and 2 weekly (No. 7) has Sodium Hyaluronate-Gel as its continual slow release internal wetting agent.
6.6.2 Silicone hydrogels
Silicone hydrogels have proved helpful with dry eyes: they have a lower water content so that there is less moisture to lose on dehydration; some materials are modified to increase their wettability and lubricity to promote better comfort.
First generation silicone hydrogels have a low water content with their surfaces modified to help wetting (eg PureVision, Bausch & Lomb, Night and Day, CIBAVision) (See Section 7.4). Second generation materials have an internal wetting agent to improve comfort in addition to having a higher water content (e.g. Acuvue Advance and Oasys with Hydraclear, Johnson & Johnson). One day disposables are also available and are particularly aimed at patients requiring comfortable social wear (eg TruEyes, Johnson & Johnson, and Clariti, Sauflon).
6.6.3 Rigid gas-permeable materials
Surface modified materials can give better wetting and increased comfort (e.g. Millenium, Hybrid FS), (See Chapter 7).
92
The tear film and dry eyes 6 Chapter 
PRACTICAL ADVICE
•Non-preserved rewetting drops are preferable with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel lenses (e.g. Refresh Contacts, Blink Contacts).
•Rewetting drops should be used before the symptoms start rather than trying to alleviate them once evident.
•Routine rewetting, such as mid morning and early evening, can reduce or prevent symptoms.
References
1.Mishima S. Corneal thickness. Surv Ophthalmol 1968;13:57–96.
2.Argueso P, Gipon IK. Epithelial mucins of the ocular surface: structure, biosynthesis and function. Exp Eye Res 2001;73:281–9.
3.Veys J, Davies I. Basic contact lens practice, Part 4 – Assessment of the tear film. Optician 1995;209(5496):18–24.
4.O’Toole L. The tears and lacrimal gland. Diagnosing sight and life-threatening eye disease. Differential Diagnosis of Ocular Disease Module 9, Part 3. Optometry Today
2006;March:42–7.
5.Guillon J-P, Godfrey A. Chap 5 Tears and Contact Lenses. Contact Lenses 5th ed. B-H; 2007.
6.McMonnies CW, Ho A, Wakefield D. Optimum dry eye classification using questionnaire responses. Advances in Experimental and medical Biology
1998;438:835–8.
7.Schiffman RM, et al. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophalmol 2000;118:615–21.
8.Little SA, Bruce AS. Repeatability of the phenol-red thread and tear thinning time tests for tear film function. Clin Exp Optom 1994;77:64–8.
9.Johnson M. Tears and dry eye: Part 3: Diagnosis and management. Optician 2008;5 September.
10. Korb DR, Greiner JV, Herman J. Comparison of fluorescent break-up time measurement reproducibility using standard fluorescent strips versus the Dry Eye Test (DET) method. Cornea 2001;20(8):811–15.
11. Gilbert J. Nutrition and the eye. Dry eye and the role of nutrition. Optometry Today 2004;June.
12. Harvey W. Tear Sampling in practice. Optician 2008;5 September.
13. Kokke K, Morris J, Lawrenson J. Oral omega-6 essential fatty acid treatment in contact lens associated dry eye. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2008;31(3):141-6.
14. Guillon J-P, Godfrey A. Chap 5 Tears and Contact Lenses. Contact Lenses 5th ed. B-H; 2007.
15. Mann E. Drugs used in the treatment of dry eye syndrome, anti-inflammatory drugs and topical anti-allergy drugs. Optometry Today 2007;November.
93
This page intentionally left blank
Section
Preliminaries ONE
Lens types and CHAPTER7 materials
7.1 |
Rigid gas-permeable lenses |
97 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
Polymethyl methacrylate |
101 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
Soft lenses |
101 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
Silicone hydrogels |
105 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
Biocompatible lenses |
107 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
Silicone lenses |
107 |
|
|
|
The International Standard method for the classification of both rigid and soft contact lens materials is BS EN ISO 11539: 1999. This is a published European Standard and so has the status of and replaces the former British Standard for contact lenses.
Each material is classified by a six part code (Table 7.1):1
•Prefix.
•Stem.
•Series suffix.
•Group suffix.
•Dk range.
•Surface modification code.
The oxygen permeability (Dk range) part of the code is a numerical designation that categorizes the oxygen permeability in ISO Dk units at intervals which are considered significant in contact lens wear. For both lenses and materials, the oxygen permeability is measured according to ISO 9913-1 or ISO 9913-2 and the Dk range is then denoted by numbers as indicated in Table 7.2.
Example 1. ISO classification applied to a rigid gas-permeable material, Paragon HDS
Paflufocon B III 3
Paflu = USAN prefix.
focon = Stem, indicating a rigid lens material.
©2010 Elsevier Ltd, Inc, BV
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7590-1.00011-X
Section ONE Preliminaries
Table 7.1 Material classification
Prefix |
This is one of two parts of the code administered by United States |
|
|
Adopted Names (USAN). Use of the prefix is optional for all |
|
|
countries other than the USA. For example, etafilcon A has the |
|
|
USAN code ‘eta’ |
|
|
|
|
Stem |
filcon for soft lenses (hydrogel-containing lenses having at least |
|
|
10% water content by mass) and focon for rigid lenses |
|
|
|
|
Series suffix |
Also administered by USAN, a capital letter added to the stem to |
|
|
indicate the revision level of the chemical formula: A is the original |
|
|
(first) formulation, B the second and so on. Can be omitted if there |
|
|
is only one formulation. |
|
Group suffix |
Rigid lenses |
Soft lenses |
I |
Does not contain either silicon or |
<50% water content, non-ionic |
|
fluorine |
|
|
|
|
II |
Contains silicon but not fluorine |
≥50% water content, non-ionic |
|
|
|
III |
Contains both silicon and fluorine |
<50% water content, ionic |
|
|
|
IV |
Contains fluorine but not silicon |
≥50% water content, ionic |
|
|
|
Dk range |
A numerical code which identifies the permeability in ranges which |
|
|
are considered significant in contact lens wear. Dk is expressed in |
|
|
ISO units: (cm2/s) · [mlO2/(ml · hPa)] |
|
Modification |
A lower case m which denotes that the surface of the lens is |
|
code |
modified, having different chemical characteristics from the bulk |
|
|
material |
|
|
|
|
After Hough.1
Table 7.2 Oxygen permeability (Dk range). Dk units are: (cm2/s) · [ml O2/
(ml · hPa)]
0<1 Dk unit
11–15 Dk units
216–30 Dk units
331–60 Dk units
461–100 Dk units
5101–150 Dk units
6151–200 Dk units
7, … Add new categories in increments of 50 Dk units
After Hough.1
96
