- •Preface to the fourth edition
- •Preface to the first edition
- •Applied anatomy
- •Applied physiology
- •Physical properties of materials
- •Manufacture of lenses
- •References
- •Slit lamp
- •Keratometers and autokeratometers
- •Corneal topographers
- •Anterior segment photography
- •Specialist instruments for higher magnification
- •Other instruments
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Legal implications
- •Record cards
- •Clinical grading
- •Computerization of patient records
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Hygienic procedures to avoid cross-infection
- •Solutions and drugs
- •Decontamination and disinfection of trial lenses
- •In case of accident
- •Other procedures
- •Insertion and removal by the practitioner
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Discussion with the patient
- •Indications and contraindications
- •Advantages and disadvantages of lens types
- •Visual considerations
- •External eye examination
- •Patient suitability for lens types
- •References
- •The tear film
- •Dry eyes
- •Assessment of tears
- •Contact lens signs
- •Treatment and management
- •Contact lens management
- •References
- •Rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Polymethyl methacrylate
- •Soft lenses
- •Silicone hydrogels
- •Biocompatible lenses
- •Silicone lenses
- •References
- •Basic principles of rigid lens design
- •Forces controlling design
- •Concept of edge lift
- •Tear layer thickness
- •Lid attachment lenses
- •Interpalpebral lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Current bicurve, tricurve and multicurve designs
- •Current aspheric lenses
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
- •Total diameter (TD)
- •Back optic zone diameter (BOZD)
- •Peripheral curves
- •Lens design by corneal topographers
- •Recommended reading
- •Use of fluorescein
- •Examination techniques
- •Fitting
- •Correct fitting
- •Flat fitting
- •Steep fitting
- •Astigmatic fitting
- •Peripheral fitting
- •References
- •Advantages and disadvantages of aspherics
- •Aspheric designs
- •Principles of fitting
- •Fluorescein patterns compared with spherical lenses
- •References
- •International Standards
- •Examples of rigid lens types and fittings
- •Rigid lens verification
- •Tolerances
- •References
- •Historical
- •Current approach
- •Reverse geometry lenses
- •Clinical appearance of reverse geometry lenses
- •Corneal topography
- •Fitting routine
- •References
- •Further reading
- •Fitting considerations
- •Corneal diameter lenses
- •Semi-scleral lenses
- •Reference
- •Characteristics of a correct fitting
- •Characteristics of a tight fitting
- •Characteristics of a loose fitting
- •Summary of soft lens fitting characteristics
- •Lens power
- •Lens flexibility and modulus of elasticity
- •Additional visual considerations
- •Thin lenses
- •Aspheric lenses
- •Spun-cast lenses
- •Unusual lens performance
- •References
- •Frequent replacement lenses
- •Disposable lenses
- •Types of disposable lens
- •Fitting disposable lenses
- •Aftercare with disposable lenses
- •Practice management
- •Other uses for disposable lenses
- •References
- •Fitting disposable silicone hydrogels
- •Fitting custom made silicone hydrogels
- •Complex lenses
- •Dispensing silicone hydrogels
- •Aftercare
- •References
- •Further reading
- •International standards and tolerances1
- •Soft lens specification (Tables 20.1, 20.2)
- •Soft lens verification
- •References
- •Physiological requirements
- •Approaches to extended wear
- •Patient selection
- •Soft lens fitting and problems
- •Rigid gas-permeable fitting and problems
- •Other lenses for extended wear
- •Long-term consequences of extended wear
- •References
- •Residual and induced astigmatism
- •Patient selection
- •Lens designs
- •Methods of stabilization
- •Fitting back surface torics
- •Fitting bitorics
- •Compromise back surface torics
- •Fitting front surface torics
- •Fitting toric peripheries
- •Computers in toric lens fitting
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Stabilization
- •Lens designs
- •Fitting
- •Fitting examples
- •References
- •Patient selection
- •Monovision
- •Presbyopic lens designs
- •Fitting rigid multifocals and bifocals
- •Fitting soft bifocals
- •References
- •Lens identification
- •Tinted, cosmetic and prosthetic lenses
- •Fenestration
- •Overseas prescriptions
- •Contact lenses and sport
- •References
- •Components of solutions
- •Solution for soft lenses
- •Disinfection
- •Solutions for rigid gas-permeable lenses
- •Compliance and product misuse
- •References
- •Lens collection
- •Insertion and removal
- •Suggested wearing schedules
- •General patient advice
- •First aftercare visit
- •Visual problems
- •Wearing problems
- •Aftercare at yearly intervals or longer
- •References
- •Emergencies and infections
- •Grief cases (drop-outs)
- •Side effects of systemic drugs
- •Lens ageing
- •References
- •Refitting PMMA wearers
- •Prescribing spectacles for contact lens wearers
- •Rigid lens modification
- •Management
- •Instrumentation
- •Non-therapeutic fitting
- •Refractive applications
- •Therapeutic applications
- •References
- •High myopia and hypermetropia
- •Keratoconus
- •Aphakia
- •Corneal grafts (keratoplasty)
- •Corneal irregularity
- •Albinos
- •Combination lenses
- •Silicone rubber lenses
- •Bandage lenses
- •Additional therapeutic uses
- •References
- •Appendix 1
- •Journals
- •Teaching resources
- •Professional
- •General interest
- •Technology
- •Investigative techniques
- •Ophthalmology
- •Glossary
- •Index
Section ONE Preliminaries
be made between one and four minutes after instillation. It is available in the form of strips which are wetted by saline and it is used, like rose bengal, for the evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva. It is not readily available worldwide (see also Section 4.2).
Patient questionnaire on dry eyes
Screening with the aid of a questionnaire prior to contact lens fitting can give valuable information in assessing a marginally dry-eyed patient. Questionnaires have been published by McMonnies4 and, in a modified version, by CooperVision and others.5 The topics covered are:
•Symptoms experienced and extent of problems.
•Atmospheric conditions that make the eyes sensitive.
•Effects of alcohol.
•Medication taken (e.g. hormone-replacement therapy, antihistamines, tranquillizers).
•Presence of systemic conditions with dry eye side effects.
•Reports of dryness in other parts of the body.
•Sleep-induced problems.
5.6 Patient suitability for lens types
The majority of patients are now fitted with either soft or rigid gas-permeable lenses although, given the choice, most will opt for soft on grounds of comfort. Scleral, combination, PMMA or other lens forms are needed only occasionally. It is often immediately obvious from the preliminary examination and discussion which type is likely to be more suitable. Many patients can be successful with either soft or rigid lenses, but ideally, it is necessary to assess lenses of each type in order to evaluate lens performance on the eye.
5.6.1 Soft lenses
Soft lenses are now the likely first choice for most patients because of their superior initial comfort. They are, however, particularly indicated in the following cases:
New patients
•Rigid diagnostic lenses give unsatisfactory comfort because the lids or cornea are obviously too sensitive.
•Rigid diagnostic lenses give poor centration.
•The Rx is spherical and hypermetropic.
•The Rx is spherical with astigmatic ‘K’ readings (see Section 5.4).
•The pupils are very large or decentred.
•Rapid adaptation is required.
72
Preliminary considerations and examination 5 Chapter 
•An irregular wearing schedule is anticipated.
•Where there is poor or incomplete blinking prior to fitting.
•Older patients.
•There are awkward anatomical features likely to give poor rigid lens positioning (e.g. low lower lid; proptosed eyes; decentred corneal apex).
•Dusty geographic or working environment.
•Patients need the security of a lens which it is almost impossible to dislodge from the eye (e.g. sports or vocational use).
Refits or previous failures
Where rigid lenses have failed because of:
•Poor comfort.
•Poor vision.
•Flare and reflections.
•Poor centration.
•Oedema.
•Poor blinking.
•3 and 9 o’clock staining or vascularization.
•Other persistent corneal staining.
•Persistent conjunctival injection.
•Poor handling or repeated loss.
•Limbal vascularization.
5.6.2 Silicone hydrogel lenses
As silicone hydrogels become available in an increasingly wide range of parameters, they are gradually assuming priority over hydrogel lenses for most new soft lens patients because of their superior physiological properties. They are, however, particularly indicated in the following cases:
•Thick lenses (e.g. with high Rxs) where Dk/t is likely to be inadequate with a hydrogel lens.
•Extended or flexible wear.
•Corneal oedema with previous lenses.
•Persistent conjunctival injection with previous lenses.
5.6.3 Rigid gas-permeable lenses
Rigid gas-permeable lenses should still be considered in the following cases:
New patients
•Soft trial lenses give unsatisfactory vision.
•Significant corneal astigmatism is present (>3.00 D).
73
Section ONE Preliminaries
•Corneal irregularity is present (e.g. keratoconus, grafts).
•Complete corneal coverage is inadvisable (e.g. pterygium, old scar).
•Dry eyes have been diagnosed.
•An extremely high Dk is required.
•VDUs are used full-time.
•Dry geographic or working environment.
•There is a history of hay fever, vernal conjunctivitis or giant papillary conjunctivitis prior to fitting.
•The appearance of the limbal vessels prior to fitting suggests that vascularization is a likely consequence with soft lenses.
•Patients are unlikely to comply with soft lens disinfection and daily disposables are not appropriate.
•Handling difficulties are likely with soft lenses (e.g. low myopes with ultrathin lenses; very small palpebral apertures).
•Patients wish to avoid the ongoing costs of disposable lenses.
Refits or previous failures
Where soft lenses have failed because of:
•Poor vision.
•Poor comfort.
•Dry eyes.
•Poor centration or fitting.
•Poor handling or repeated breakage.
•Corneal vascularization.
•CLIPC.
•Repeated infections.
•Unacceptably short lifespan and daily disposables are not possible.
•Frequent deposits.
•Solutions allergies.
•Materials allergy.
References
1.Walker J. The forgotten generation. Optician 2008;1 February.
2.Stone J. Near vision difficulties in non-presbyopic corneal lens wearers.
Contact Lens Journal 1967;1:14–6.
3.Applegate RA, Massof RW. Changes in the contrast sensitivity function induced by contact lens wear. American Journal of Optometry 1975;52:840–6.
4.McMonnies CW, Ho A. Patient history in screening for dry eye conditions. Journal of American Optometric Association 1987;58:296–301.
5.Guillon M, Allary J-C, Guillon J-P, Osborne G. Clinical management of regular replacement: Part I. Selection of replacement frequency. ICLC 1992;19:104–20.
74
Section
Preliminaries ONE
The tear film and CHAPTER6 dry eyes
6.1 |
The tear film |
75 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
Dry eyes |
76 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
Assessment of tears |
79 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
Contact lens signs |
86 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
Treatment and management |
87 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
Contact lens management |
92 |
|
|
|
6.1 The tear film
The tear film is typically considered to be a three-layered structure between 6 and 9 m in thickness1 comprising:
•a mucoidal basal layer
•an aqueous component
•a thin superficial lipid layer
The tear film is now thought to be more complex with a mucin gel attached to the corneal microvilli and a larger aqueous and mucin interface resting on the gel with a much thinner lipid layer as the boundary between the tears and air.2
6.1.1 Maintenance of the tear film
As the eye closes during a blink the lipid layer is compressed between the lid margins. Mucin is moved to the upper and lower fornices from where it is excreted through the tear ducts. It is replaced by a new layer, created by the lids pushing against the surface of the eye. As the lids open, a new aqueous layer is spread across the now hydrophilic epithelial surface. The lipid layer, made thicker from lid closure, spreads out producing a monolayer across the aqueous to reduce tear evaporation. The new tear film is relatively unstable and tear evaporation reduces the thickness and allows lipids to diffuse towards the mucus. The now contaminated mucin begins to lose its hydrophilicity and the tear film
©2010 Elsevier Ltd, Inc, BV
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7590-1.00011-X
