Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Retinal Vascular Disease Joussen Springer
.pdf
242 |
II General Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Retinal Vascular Disease |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tosensitizer. |
The |
photosensitizer is transformed |
|||||||||||
|
|
14.2.2 Differences Between PDT and Laser |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
from the ground singlet to the excited singlet state. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Coagulation |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This state of activity may decay non-radiatively by |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
The differences between laser coagulation and pho- |
internal conversion, emit photons deriving fluores- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14 II |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
todynamic therapy are presented in Table 14.1, |
cence, or undergo intersystem crossing at the elec- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
which shows that both techniques require different |
tron level to the excited triplet state. It represents a |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
parameters regarding duration of light exposure, |
highly reactive, short-living molecule, which may |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
number of exposures, spot size, intensity of light and |
emit phosphorescence with conversion back to the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
visibility immediately after the performance of the |
ground state. Alternatively, it initiates photochemi- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
procedure. |
|
|
|
|
|
cal reactions by transferring energy via two path- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ways: It may induce Type I and Type II reactions by |
|||||||||||||
|
Table 14.1. Differences between laser coagulation and photody- |
interacting |
with |
neighboring |
tissue substrates |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(Type I) or ground state (3O2) oxygen (Type II), |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
namic therapy according to the duration of light exposure, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
number of exposures, spot size, intensity of light and visibility |
respectively (Fig. 14.3). In the Type I reaction, the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
after the treatment session. The parameters of laser coagulation |
excited triplet state molecule reacts directly with tis- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
and PDT are compared (↑ high, long, ↓ low, short) |
|
|
sue substrates, and an electron or hydrogen atom |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
transfer takes place leading to |
superoxide-anion |
||||||||||||
|
|
Parameters |
|
Laser |
PDT |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(O2–). In Type II reaction, the excited triplet state |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coagulation |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
molecule reacts with ground state oxygen leading to |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Duration of light exposure |
|
↓ |
↑ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
excited state singlet oxygen (1O2) formation, while |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Number of treatment spots |
|
↑ |
↓ |
|
the photosensitizer regenerates to the ground state |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Treatment spot size |
|
↓ |
↑ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(Fig. 14.3). This Type II reaction with singlet oxygen |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Intensity of light |
|
↑ |
↓ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
production is suggested to mediate the major part of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Visibility immediately after treatment ↑ |
↓ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
the photodynamic reaction, although it has not been |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
detected in vivo. Singlet oxygen has a short life time |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(< 0.04 μs) and a short radius of action (< 0.02 μm) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
14.2.3 Mechanisms of Photodynamic Therapy |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
[13, 14]. Therefore the photodynamic reaction medi- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
The photochemical processes in the target tissue |
ated tissue damage is closely related to the localiza- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
after this basic two-step procedure are shown in |
tion of the sensitizing agent [14]. In experimental |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fig. 14.3. The term photodynamic reaction is used to |
setups one photon is able to induce one singlet oxy- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
distinguish photosensitized reactions from other |
gen molecule. Nevertheless, the reactive oxygen spe- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
photochemical processes suggesting that oxygen is |
cies, singlet oxygen, superoxide-anion, hydroxyl rad- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
consumed [14]. Briefly, after administration of the |
icals and the triplet ground state photosensitizer are |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
photosensitizing agent and accumulation within the |
involved in mediating tissue injury at the cellular, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
target area, light energy is absorbed (h ) by the pho- |
subcellular, nucleic acid, enzyme and cell membrane |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
hv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Sens * |
|
|
Type II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excited |
|
|
|
|
|
3 O2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Photosensitizer |
|
|
|
|
Triplet State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
energy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phosphorescence |
Electron spin |
Type I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
intersystem crossing |
e-, H + transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Sens * |
|
|
1 O2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free-radicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singlet State |
|
Cytotoxic intermediate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluoreszence |
|
|
|
substrates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vascular damage |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sens * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cellular damage |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immunomodulation |
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Singlet State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 14.3. Mechanisms of the |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
photodynamic reaction |
||

, IL-2, tumor necrosis factor-
, IL-10, and granulocyte stimulating factors; migration of macrophages and neutrophils; and activation of B-lympho- cytes and subtypes of T-lymphocytes has been reported [12, 16, 32, 33]. In addition, transient immunosuppressive effects after PDT have been observed: The survival of skin allografts has been prolonged at low concentrations of verteporfin, which might be mediated by reduced amounts of antigen presenting cells [44].