Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Retinal Vascular Disease Joussen Springer

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
32.69 Mб
Скачать

4 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Vascular Development and Ocular Neovascularization

after fertilization. These hematopoietic intra-aortic clusters have been described in all vertebrate embryos, including humans [44]. Other structures potentially involved in intraembryonic HSC generation are the subaortic patches (SAPs), located below the aortic floor, which express the transcription factor GATA-3 [84] and the AA4.1 antigen [106]. SAPs disappear concomitantly with the cessation of AGMHSC production at 12 days postfertilization [43, 84].

AGM-hematopoietic activity has been shown to derive from cells harboring markers shared by endothelial and hematopoietic lineages. These cells also lack the panhematopoietic marker CD45 [28]. Thus the endothelium of the aortic floor is believed to display “hemogenic” activity and is able to give rise to HSCs. Recently, Bertrand showed that CD45+ cells contain only macrophage precursors while CD45–/ loc-kit+AA4.1+CD41+ AGM fraction contains multipotent cells which account for the bulk of multipotent precursors at this stage and contain the LTR activity [16]. When HSCs are released into the circulation they seed the fetal liver and eventually the adult bone marrow [97].

4.2.1 HSCs Lack Regional Patterning

Most tissues are patterned so that progenitors in different locations are programmed to have different properties. For example, stem cells from different regions of the nervous system acquire intrinsic differences in their properties as they migrate through distinct environments [47].

HSCs by virtue of their function also migrate through diverse environments throughout life. Keil and coworkers asked whether HSCs change as they are exposed to diverse environments. This ability would affect their plasticity. They observed significant differences in hematopoiesis between the fetal liver and fetal spleen. However, they were not able to detect phenotypic, functional, or gene expression differences between the HSCs in these organs. Their work suggests no regional differences between HSCs. They were also unable to detect phenotypic, functional, or gene expression differences between HSCs in different adult bone marrow compartments. Their failure to detect differences among stem cells from different regions of the hematopoietic system unlike the nervous system at the same time during development suggests that the hematopoietic system has evolved mechanisms to prevent the spatial reprogramming of HSC properties as they migrate between distinct environments [66].

4.3 Defining the Adult HSCs

Adult HSCs are mostly quiescent cells that comprise ~0.05 – 0.1 % of the bone marrow [60, 91, 124]. Upon activation, HSCs proliferate and differentiate into progenitor cells which can be found in the peripheral blood [59]. These progenitor cells may then differentiate further as required. At the same time, HSCs may divide to yield undifferentiated progeny with identical HSC characteristics, fulfilling the two criteria for a stem cell: self-renewal and the ability to give rise to differentiated progeny.

HSCs in the adult are found in the bone marrow and continue to repopulate cells of the blood and lymph throughout life [85]. In addition, HSCs are now known to have hemangioblast activity, i.e., they can differentiate into all components of the vascular system (vessels as well as blood components, Fig. 4.1). HSCs have been reported to have the potential to differentiate into a variety of other tissues, including liver [74], muscle [39], and neuronal cells [20, 35, 87], thus demonstrating a role for stem cell plasticity in tissue maintenance and repair.

4.3.1 HSC Self-Renewal

Stem cells are heralded as a limitless source for tissue or organ regeneration because of their self-renewal capacity. However, the self-renewal capacity has not been quantified and remains an issue of debate. Most researchers would consider the most reliable indicator of self-renewal capacity to be the long-term multilineage repopulating activity, detectable by transplantation experiments.

Evidence for self-renewal of HSCs has been provided by retroviral marking studies in which HSC clones tagged with retroviral integration sites were transplanted into secondary recipients [32, 65]. A high degree of HSC purification enabled successful long-term reconstitution with single HSCs [36, 102]. Since then transplantation of single CD34/low and c- kit+ Sca-1+ lineage (KSL) cells has been successfully accomplished by many investigators [37, 51]. We observed donor-derived CD34KSL cells in the recipients’ bone marrow indicating self-renewal and expansion of the originally transplanted single CD34KSL cells [51]. Studies by Ema, however, demonstrated that when single CD34KSL cells were sorted and transplanted into secondary recipients, the reconstitution capacity of the CD34KSL cells appeared significantly diminished. These data imply that while HSCs do self-renew in bone marrow of primary recipients, their capacity to self-renew declines [37].

In attempting to better characterize and thus quantify self-renewal, additional endpoints have

79

I 4

80 I Pathogenesis of Retinal Vascular Disease

4 I

Fig. 4.1. Plasticity and differentiation potential of stem and precursor cells. The differentiation potential, also called plasticity, varies with the age and lineage commitment. The most plastic cell is the totipotent fertilized egg. This cell differentiates into pluripotent embryonic stem cells. The adult multipotent HSC is derived from these embryonic stem cells and its differentiation potential is debated. However, it is known that the HSC is at least multipotent, giving rise to numerous oligopotent progenitor/precursor cells. These cells include the common macrophage/granulocyte precursor (CMGP), the common megakaryocyte/ erythrocyte precursor (CMEP) and the common lymphocyte precursor (CLP). We are coining the word “endotheloid” to describe the endothelial precursor which has recently been shown to derive from HSCs. The plasticity of a particular cell type can be partially determined by the expression of different cell surface markers. These cell surface markers can be used to determine lineage potential

been developed. Such terms as competitive repopulation [88], repopulating units (RUs) [55], and competitive repopulating units (CRUs) [126] have been used to express stem cell activity quantitatively. RUs indicate the amount of repopulating activity and CRUs the actual number of stem cells. Thus these two measurements complement one another. When both values are determined for an experiment the mean activity of stem cells (MAS) can be calculated (MAS = RU/CRU). Ema and coworkers demonstrated a great diversity of repopulating activity in HSCs using these tools [37]. While all myeloid, B-lymphoid, and T-lymphoid lineages were reconstituted, the degrees of reconstitution in each lineage varied. They determined that the proliferation capacity of HSCs is dis-

sociated from the multilineage differentiation capacity and that this heterogeneity of HSCs is likely to result from their different levels of self-renewal capacity. Measurement of CRUs given by single HSCs suggested that the greater the self-renewal capacity the higher the repopulating activity. Similarly, HSCs with low RU regenerate themselves less than those with high RU. The heterogeneity in self-renewal capacity that these investigators observed implied that HSC self-renewal is not an unlimited capability [37].

These data may explain why bone marrow cells cannot be serially transplanted in mice more than four to six times, and support the generation-age model [111]. Allsopp and colleagues postulated that

4 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Vascular Development and Ocular Neovascularization

a molecular mechanism responsible for the decline in repopulating ability associated with aging could include shortening of telomeres in HSCs after transplantation [2]. However, when they overexpressed telomerase to prevent telomere shortening in HSCs they were unable to prevent the decline in stem cell activity. They concluded that unless telomeres are critically short, telomere shortening itself does not seem to be a limiting factor for the repopulating ability of HSCs [2].

Homing is another factor that could potentially influence the repopulating ability of HSCs. Enhanced homing ability may explain higher repopulating ability in Lnk-deficient HSCs [37]. Lnk is a family of adaptor proteins implicated in integration and regulation of multiple signaling events. Only Lnk-defi- cient, and not wild-type, HSCs homed to “incomplete niches” that express very low levels of cognate ligands. The authors postulated that Lnk-deficient HSCs stay longer in niches allowing the maintenance of self-renewal [37]. Nevertheless, all these studies were performed in HSCs that express foreign genes or proteins to facilitate tracking. Thus, these genetically manipulated HSCs may behave differently than normal ones and may have different self-renewal characteristics as well as altered transdifferentiation.

4.3.2 HSC Pluripotency/Plasticity

Recent studies support the possibility that HSCs may have broad potential to differentiate into various cell types. Our studies using HSC for bone transplantation support that HSCs significantly contribute to new retinal, choroidal and iris endothelium following mechanical injury [51, 52, 119]. Sahara and coworker tested the pluripotency of HSCs by comparing vascular lesions induced by mechanical injury after bone marrow reconstitution with total bone marrow cells, KSL cells, or a single HSC cell (Tip-SP CD34KSL cell with the strongest dye-efflux activity) harboring gfp [114]. The lesions contained a significant number of gfp+ cells in the total bone marrow and KSL groups, whereas gfp+ cells were rarely detected in the HSC group. Sahara’s studies suggest that it is rare for a highly purified HSCs to transdifferentiate into vascular cells, whereas the KSL fraction of bone marrow cells contained a distinct population that could substantially contribute to vascular lesion formation. The authors concluded that although the KSL fraction is considered to be enriched in HSCs, mesenchymal stem cells or multipotent cells, cells more primitive than HSCs were present in this fraction and may be responsible for the vascular lesions observed. They also suggest that non-hematopoietic cells in the KSL fraction might be responsible for the KSL-derived endothelial-like cells

or smooth muscle-like cells that some investigators observed in the vascular lesion [114]. In contrast, we showed using single cell transplants that HSCs form endothelial cells but not smooth muscle-type cells in a model of retinal neovascularization [51]. Clearly more studies need to be performed to fully understand HSC potential.

Numerous investigators have demonstrated plasticity or trans/dedifferentiation of HSCs. As pointed out by Kucia and Ratajczak many of these studies did not contain proper controls to exclude such issues as cell fusion. They describe that in addition to HSCs, bone marrow also harbors versatile subpopulations of tissue-committed stem cells (TCSCs) and perhaps even more primitive pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) [72]. These rare cells accumulate in bone marrow during ontogenesis and are released from the bone marrow into peripheral blood after tissue injury to regenerate damaged organs. The presence of TCSCs/ PSCs in bone marrow should be considered before experimental evidence is interpreted simply as trans/ dedifferentiation or plasticity of HSCs and that bone marrow-derived stem cells are heterogeneous.

Despite numerous reports showing a contribution of HSCs to regenerate different tissues, the results have not always been reproduced by other investigators [12, 94, 96, 136] and an attempt to explain this discrepancy needs to be made. The outcome of this discrepancy is that researchers are polarized in their view of stem cell plasticity. The disparity in the literature could be explained by differences in the tissue injury models employed, purity of stem cell populations used for regeneration, or inability to detect tissue chimerism due to technical limitations [75, 79].

In addition, alternative explanations for the observed HSC transdifferentiation have been proposed. For example, the chemokine stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and its receptor (CXCR4) are crucial to stem cell homing and recruitment [17]. It has been shown that CXCR4+ TCSCs circulate in the body and compete for occupancy of SDF-1-positive niches in various tissue/organs [71]. Hematopoietic, skeletal muscle satellite, liver oval, neural and other tissuespecific stem/progenitor cells express CXCR4 and circulate at low levels in the peripheral blood to maintain stem cell pools in distant parts of the body. Bone marrow is a source of SDF-1, stem cell chemoattractants and survival factors. In the bone marrow not only HSCs but also differentiated circulating TCSCs can compete with HSCs for stem cell niches.

Stem cell plasticity has been explained in some systems by cell fusion [4, 22, 23, 132, 146]. Donorderived HSCs or monocytes were observed to fuse with differentiated cells in recipient tissues which led to the creation of daughter cells that have a double number of chromosomes in their nuclei and express

81

I 4

82

4 I

I Pathogenesis of Retinal Vascular Disease

cell surface and cytoplasmic markers that are derived from both parental cells. However, fusion as a major contributor to the observed donor-derived chimerism has been excluded in several recently published studies in various organs [3, 54, 64, 120]. An even more controversial interpretation of this is the possibility of so-called therapeutic cell fusion [22, 23].

While our studies and others support the hypothesis that HSCs can adopt a tissue-specific phenotype by transdifferentiation, this view remains controversial. Others believe that the process really involves fusion and not transdifferentiation [132, 135]. Campbell and coworkers documented polyploidization of vascular smooth muscle cells in response to mechanical and humoral stimuli [24]. Thus, in some settings cell fusion can account for part of the accumulation of bone marrow-derived cells in the repair of injured tissue including vascular lesions. However, we have been unable to detect polyploidy in HSCderived cells within vascular lesions of the retina, choroid or iris following injury. While fusion may represent a significant component of the HSC repair observed in the liver and in vascular smooth muscle in some vascular beds, we consider it a rare event in the vasculature of the eye.

4.4 The HSC Niche

Stem cells are thought to occupy discrete spaces consisting of cellular elements, matrix, signaling molecules and pathways, collectively called a niche (Fig. 4.2) [90, 118]. The precise nature of these cellular and molecular components (the microenvironment) is thought to maintain the typical features of stem cells, i.e., quiescence, maintenance or expansion. Interaction of HSCs with their niche is critical for adult hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. HSCs must maintain the balance between quiescence and self-renewal in the stem cell niche as well as maintain long-term hematopoiesis.

The HSC niche comprises the endosteal surface of the bone marrow cavity, with osteoblasts being the most important cellular elements in maintaining HSCs [48, 81, 147]. Various signaling pathways and soluble molecules, including Wnt, Notch, transforming growth factor /bone morphogenic protein and Hedgehog, are known to be involved in all stem cell niches [42]. Of these, Wnt signaling appears to be most important for HSC self-renewal [109].

HSCs can be removed from the bone marrow of a donor and successfully engrafted by infusion into peripheral blood. Engraftment requires the transmigration of circulating HSCs from peripheral blood into the recipient’s niche. This engraftment depends upon the physical availability of niche space, as well

as homing signals. The spatial requirement is usually met by either chemical or radiological bone marrow ablation. The homing signals that induce this transmigration are poorly understood and only now beginning to be studied. It is thought that some of the same signals that induce HSC mobilization from the bone marrow are also involved in repopulating the HSC niche [1, 142].

4.4.1Molecular Mechanisms for Maintenance in the Niche

The Tie2-angiopoietin system appears to play a critical role in regulating proliferation, adhesion and survival of HSCs. Tie2+ HSCs have a higher long-term reconstitution activity than do Tie2 HSCs. Arai and coworkers put forth the idea that localization of Tie2+ HSCs on the bone surface is regulated by stem- cell-specific adhesion molecules such as N-cadherin [6]. Once the HSCs localize to osteoblasts, angiopoie- tin-1 (Ang-1) produced by osteoblasts may activate its receptor, Tie2, on HSCs and promote tight adhesion of HSCs in the niche, resulting in quiescence and enhanced survival of HSCs.

Tie2/Ang-1 signaling induces adhesion of HSCs to fibronectin and collagen [116, 128]. Following Ang-1 binding, phosphorylation of Tie2 results in activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/ Akt signaling pathway to promote endothelial cell survival [68]. Ang-1 leads to morphologic changes in HSCs in a 1-integrin-dependent manner and increases adherence of HSCs to the bone surface in vivo [7, 68]. The tight cell attachment of HSCs to stromal cells likely affects the cell-cycle status of HSCs. Since integrins trigger signaling that promotes cell survival, cell adhesion enhanced by Tie2/ Ang-1 signaling may protect HSCs from stress in combination with PI3-kinase/Akt signaling. Ang-1 administration provides clinical benefits that protect HSCs from anticancer therapy [25]. Thus Ang-1 maintains the in vivo repopulating ability of HSCs by inhibiting cell division and promotes quiescence of HSCs in vivo and Tie2 signaling keeps HSCs in the niche [7]. While Tie2 is required for postnatal bone marrow hematopoiesis it is not required for embryonic hematopoiesis. Tie2 is critical for the maintenance and survival of HSCs in the adult bone marrow and Tie2-deficient or kinase-deficient Tie2 cells are unable to occupy the adult bone marrow niche when competing with wild-type cells [7].

4.5 HSC Mobilization

Adult HSCs expand and differentiate exclusively in the bone marrow, from which they can be mobilized into the bloodstream. Cell-cell and cell-matrix inter-

4 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Vascular Development and Ocular Neovascularization

Fig. 4.2. Hematopoietic stem cells can be induced to leave the stem cell niche, differentiate, and participate in neovascularization. This simplified schematic depicts some of the more well-known molecules and events involved in HSC mobilization. The lower half of the figure shows a damaged retinal microvessel, which releases several key molecules including SDF-1, VEGF and IL-8. These molecules act as mobilization signals, reaching the bone marrow stroma via the circulation, where they interact with numerous components of the HSC niche (top half of the figure). SDF-1 and IL-8 are both involved in G-CSF-mediated release and differentiation of HSC. SDF-1 and VEGF both act on osteoclasts, inducing their release of membranebound SCF. VEGF also acts directly to increase HSC proliferation, and may possibly influence their differentiation. SDF-1 mediates the release of MMP-9 from osteoclasts. Free MMP-9 can then cleave kit ligand, which influences HSCs, and MMP-9 can induce the release of HSCs from the stroma by impacting cell adhesion. Together these events result in the proliferation of HSCs and their differentiation into first multipotent progenitors and then into endothelial progenitors. The precise temporal sequence of differentiation and concomitant changes in

surface marker expression remain to be fully described, but it is likely that by the time mobilized cells translocate from the niche into the circulation they are fully committed to a specific terminal differentiation pathway. These circulating EPCs are then induced to leave the circulation by locally high concentrations of mobilization factors (among other, less clear signals) where they then differentiate fully and participate in reparative or regenerative processes. Here they are shown integrating with resident endothelium to form a compensatory collateral vessel

83

I 4

actions are crucial to the proliferation and differentiation of HSCs in the bone marrow niche. Depending on the circumstances, HSCs can traffic from the marrow into the circulation in large numbers, a process termed mobilization [26]. Mobilization of HSCs is mediated by a complex interplay of changes in inte- grin-mediated adhesion as well as chemokine and growth factor receptor signaling.

Exogenous administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard method of inducing stem and progenitor cell release into the circulation in a clinical setting [26]. The chemokines interleukin 8 (IL-8) [112] and stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) [56] both participate in G-CSF-mediated stem cell mobilization. SDF-1, as well as VEGF and PlGF (vascular endothelial growth factor and placen-

84

4 I

I Pathogenesis of Retinal Vascular Disease

tal growth factor, respectively), induces osteoclasts to secrete the metalloprotease MMP-9, whose action results in the shedding of the membrane-bound cytokine stem cell factor (SCF) from the bone marrow, releasing it into the circulation. Inhibiting SDF- 1 has been shown to reduce the degree of stem cell involvement in induced neovascularization [119].

4.5.1 The SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis

Endothelial cells in developing vascular beds express the SDF-1 receptor CXCR4, and animals deficient in either SDF-1 or CXCR4 do not form large vessels within the gastrointestinal tract, clearly indicating a role for this chemokine ligand/receptor in vascular development [82, 95, 127, 148]. CD34+ cells express functional CXCR4 and migrate in response to SDF-1 [104]. CXCR4 expression by endothelial cells of various origins is also well documented [93]. In endothelial cells, CXCR4 expression is increased after treatment with VEGF or basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) [115]. SDF-1 has also been shown to stimulate VEGF expression in a number of cells [67]. Any tissue production of SDF-1 results in mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors from the marrow to that tissue [105].

4.6Surface Marker Expression – HSC Identification

In the adult, HSCs can be distinguished from mature blood cells by their lack of lineage-specific markers and the presence of certain other cell-surface antigens [141]. Human cells express CD133 (prominin-1, a pentaspan membrane protein) [86] while murine HSCs express the cell surface molecules c-kit (CD117) and stem cell antigen-1 (Sca-1; Ly-6 A/E), and lack markers of differentiated peripheral blood cells (lineage markers, or Lin).

Most investigative studies have been performed on mice. CD117 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is also expressed on mast cells, germ cells, and melanocytes. CD117 mutant mice have defects in HSC activity, lack pigmentation, and are sterile [15]. Mice deficient in c-kit have macrocytic anemia, decreased megakaryocyte numbers, decreased mast cell numbers, and defects in maintenance of B- and T-cell compartments [34, 137, 138]. CD117 appears to play a key role in the establishment of HSCs in the bone marrow “niche.” Blocking c-kit function in progenitor cells prior to transplant allowed normal homing to the marrow but defects occurred in lodging in the niche [33].

Sca-1 is a cell surface protein found not only on hematopoietic but also on mammary gland, cardiac, and mesenchymal stem cells in the mouse [11, 78,

124, 139]. Sca-1 is necessary for normal HSC activity as Sca-1–/– mice have defects in short-term competitive transplantation and serial transplantation [63]. In addition, Sca-1 knockout cells form fewer CFUs upon transplantation [63]. Because of these transplantation defects, it is believed that Sca-1 plays a role in HSC self-renewal.

Sca-1 belongs to a family of proteins bearing a UPAR (urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) domain. The UPAR domain is about 90 amino acids long and is important in cell adhesion and migration, modulates integrin function and regulates degradation of the extracellular matrix [18, 108]. Furthermore, UPAR directly regulates integrin expression and function by signaling and/or binding to integrins [18]. Therefore, Sca-1 is believed to modulate integrin function in HSC.

In addition to modulating HSC behavior, Sca-1 suppresses T-cell proliferation and alters signaling through the T-cell receptor (TCR) [125]. Sca-1 downregulation is required for T-cell differentiation [13]. Sca-1–/– mice have decreased megakaryocyte and platelet formation [63]. Interestingly, Bradfute and coworkers recently showed that Sca-1 affects CD117 expression and lineage fate of peripheral blood cells after transplantation and human CD34+ cell activity, but is not critical for self-renewal [19].

Although Sca-1 is routinely used to isolate many stem cells in the mouse, its biological role in HSC function is still only partially characterized. For example, such questions as how Sca-1 affects HSC engraftment and proliferation and how overexpression of Sca-1 affects HSC function remain unanswered.

4.7Surface Marker Expression – HSC Isolation

Isolation of mouse HSCs is a relatively straightforward, although time-consuming, process. The basic principle involves identifying specific cell populations with antibodies conjugated to either magnetic particles or fluorochromes, and then sorting the cells thus identified using magnetic or fluorescence activated cell sorting (MACS or FACS), respectively. HSCs and their progeny can be identified immunologically through their expression of distinct surface markers, the composition of which changes during differentiation. Typically some surface markers appear while others disappear (Fig. 4.1). Sca-1 and CD117 are most often used to distinguish HSCs from other cell types. These two markers yield a population of cells that is 95 % HSCs. Additional purification may be accomplished with considerable effort by first depleting lineage cells using antibodies to B220 (B-lymphocytes), CD3, CD4 and CD8 (T-lym-

4 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Vascular Development and Ocular Neovascularization

85

Fig. 4.3. The generation of chimeric animals is depicted in schematic form. The bone marrow of recipient C57 BL/ 6J mice is depleted with lethal irradiation. At the same time, sorted HSCs from gfp+/+ donor mice are transplanted into these recipients. After 1 month, stable reconstitution is established through flow cytometry. These chimeric mice are then used for subsequent experiments. With the transplantation technique, the end functionality of the donor cells can be determined based on the presence of the gfp label in the cells

phocytes), CD11b (macrophages), Gr-1 (granulocytes), and TER119 (erythroblasts). This approach first uses magnetic bead-conjugated antibodies to deplete the lineage cells, followed by FACS using fluorescent-conjugated antibodies to CD117 and Sca-1 of the remaining cell fraction. For general reconstitution of bone marrow-ablated recipient animals, the use of FACS (CD177 and Sca-1) is usually sufficient. The following protocol is used routinely in our laboratory.

4.8 Methodologies

4.8.1 Extraction of HSCs from Donor Mice

1.Use 10to 20-week-old donor mice. TgN(GFPU)5Nagy (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME), bred in-house for homozygosity at the gfp locus, are used if tagged HSCs are needed. If HSCs are being used to reconstitute irradiated recipient mice, one donor mouse is needed for every ten recipients (Fig. 4.3).

2.Put to death donor mice; dissect away both hind legs and place on ice.

3.Working within a sterile field such as a laminar flow hood, dislocate the knee joint and cut through the joint to separate the thigh from the calf.

4.Dissect soft tissue away from the femur and tibia and slice off the joints, exposing the bone marrow.

5.Expel the marrow using a tuberculin syringe with ~0.5 – 1 ml sterile PBS (phosphate buffered saline) for each bone into a sterile centrifuge tube.

6.After collecting all of the marrow, homogenize by repeated pipetting.

I 4

7.Centrifuge 300×g/10 min/4 °C; decant and resuspend in 2 ml of sterile PBS.

8.Aliquot into four tubes as follows:

a)500 μl sterile PBS, 30 μl BM cells.

b)500 μl sterile PBS, 30 μl BM cells, 1 μl phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated rat anti-mouse Sca-1 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA).

c)500 μl sterile PBS, 30 μl BM cells, 1 μl allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated rat anti-mouse CD117 (BD Pharmingen).

d)To the remaining BM cells add 120 μl of PE-anti- Sca-1 and 120 μl APC-anti-CD117.

9.Incubate 15 min/4 °C.

10.Centrifuge 300×g/10 min/4 °C; decant and resuspend pellets in PBS (1 ml for tubes a, b and c, 10 ml for tube d).

11.Strain through filter tubes (cell-strainer cap, e.g., Falcon 2235) to remove large cell clumps and other debris.

12.Sort HSCs in tube d using a FACS Vantage SE Turbosort (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) or similar device to collect the fraction of cells positive for both CD117 and Sca-1; tubes a, b and c are used for calibration. Collect HSCs into sterile PBS with 30 % (v/v) serum during sort.

13.Combine sorted HSC fractions and wash by centrifugation 300×g/10 min/4 °C.

4.8.2Reconstitution of Bone Marrow-Ablated Recipient Mice

1.Recipient animals: 10 – 16 week old C57BL6/J.

2.Irradiate mice (850 – 900 rad) to ablate bone marrow.

3.Introduce ~5,000 HSCs into the systemic circulation of each recipient animal, either by tail vein or retro-orbital sinus injection.

86

4 I

IPathogenesis of Retinal Vascular Disease

4.Maintain animals on antibacterial water (Bactrim or Baytril) for at least 2 weeks.

5.Assess bone marrow reconstitution after at least 1 month. A successful reconstitution will result in a high percentage of gfp+ leukocytes. Using flow cytometry analysis after a tail bleed, animals with at least 25 % gfp+ peripheral blood cells are considered reconstituted.

4.8.3 EPC Culture

Cell lines have been utilized to study many aspects of stem cell behavior. Stromal cell lines have been generated from the AGM region to study the molecular events involved in hematopoiesis and HSC differentiation within the AGM microenvironment [97]. These lines successfully maintained cultures of murine fetal liver-derived [97], marrow-derived [144], and human cord blood-derived cells [73]. Much focus has been given to characterizing growth factors believed responsible for the maintenance of hematopoiesis and differentiation in vitro [99].

Soluble factors are used for the preparation of medium required for the maintenance or expansion of stem cells in vitro. Commonly added factors are TPO, Flk2-ligand (FL), SCF, IL-6, G-CSF, and IL-3. Although some media have met with a degree of success, most investigators reported only a moderate expansion of stem cells in culture. It is difficult to maintain stem cells in culture without the presence of a supportive feeder layer of cells. Whether stem cells need to be in contact with these stromal cells is still a matter of debate. Both the AGM-S3 and DAS104 – 4 cell lines were incapable of maintaining early progenitors from fetal liver [97] or cord blood CD34+ cells [144] when they were not in direct contact with the stromal cells during culture. Thus stromal cells may be necessary for the maintenance of bone marrow HSCs because they provide anchorage as well as growth factors [98, 101]. As discussed below secreted molecules are equally important for the maintenance of stem cells in non-contact culture.

In our laboratory, EPCs are cultured using the endocult liquid medium kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, CA) per manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 16 ml of human peripheral blood is collected into a CPT tube (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and spun to obtain the mononuclear cell fraction (MNC). The MNCs are washed twice with PBS/2 % FBS and the pellet resuspended in 3 ml of endocult medium. The cells are plated onto a six-well fibronectin-coated dish (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and kept at 37 °C, 5 % CO2 for 2 days. After 2 days, the non-adherent EPCs are harvested and further cultured for an additional 3 days to allow formation of endothelial colonies. Colonies are defined as a central core of

“round” cells with elongated “sprouting” cells at the periphery and are classified as early outgrowth colony forming unit-endothelial cells or CFU-ECs.

CD34+ cells are isolated from peripheral human blood using EasySep magnet kit (Stem Cell Technologies) per manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly 2×108 MNCs/ml are isolated from peripheral blood using CPT tubes. EasySep positive selection cocktail is added (100 μl/ml cells) to the MNCs and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Following the incubation, 50 μl/ml of EasySep magnetic nanoparticles are added to the MNCs and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. The cells are washed five times within the magnet. The positively selected cells are then removed from the magnet and kept in HPGM media containing stem cell factor (25 ng/ml), thrombopoietin (50 ng/ml) and flk/flt ligand (50 ng/ml, R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). These factors help to keep the cells in the undifferentiated state.

CD34+ cells were obtained from the peripheral blood of healthy subjects using flow cytometry, labeled via PKH67 dye (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and injected into postnatal day 1 mouse pups intravitreally. The pups were then subjected to the oxygeninduced retinopathy model as described by Smith [122]. The eyes were then removed, dissected, and examined for the presence of the green cells colocalizing with the vessels (Fig. 4.4).

4.8.3.1 Supportive Cells and Soluble Factors

Several different stromal cell lines have been reported to support HSC maintenance in culture. Oostendorp and colleagues compared gene expression profiles of two HSC-supportive and four HSC- non-supportive cell lines and focused on genes that might be involved in the common mechanism of HSC maintenance [100]. Thirty-one genes were found to be differentially expressed more than twofold in the HSC-supportive stromal cell lines compared with non-supportive lines. One-third of the genes expressed at a higher level in HSC-supporting stromal cells are secretory proteins. The authors favored the view that maintenance of HSCs is not supported by alternatives to VCAM-1-dependent adhesion pathways but by mechanisms dependent on soluble molecules. This favors the view that HSC maintenance on embryonic AGM-derived stromal cells is supported by contact-independent mechanisms [100].

The HSC-supportive cell line AFT024 expresses high levels of pleiotrophin (PTN), thrombospondin- 2 (TSP2) and insulin-like growth factor binding pro- tein-3 (IGFBP-3) [53]. PTN is a heparin-binding cytokine that in the embryo is expressed in metanephric and developing liver mesenchymal cells [9].

4 Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Vascular Development and Ocular Neovascularization

87

I 4

Transplanted CD34+ cells

Rhodamine-dextran

Fig. 4.4. Large numbers of transplanted PKH67+ CD34+ cells were seen along the entire length of blood vessels after vaso-obliteration. The animals were perfused with rhodamine-dextran. The colocalization of the gfp+ cells and the blood vessel can be seen in the bottom panel, indicating that not only stem cells, but progenitor cells can be involved in differentiation into vascular cell types. These cells

can then incorporate into and increase the patency Merge of functional vessels

PTN is known as a guidance molecule for neurites and osteoblasts, probably by using surface-expressed syndecan 3 [70]. Whether PTN deficiency also affects HSCs has not been determined. PTN binds to several cell-surface molecules besides syndecan 3, including anaplastic lymphoma kinase [5], protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor Z (also known as RPTP-) [83], and cytoplasmic nucleolin [129]. Expression of the multifunctional cytoplasm-nucleolus shuttling protein nucleolin is observed in HSCs and is able to import endocytosed PTN into the nucleus [107].

IGFBP-3 was also highly expressed on AFT024 and the long-term culture-supportive cell line HS27a [49]. Our laboratory has extensively studied IGFBP-3 function in cultured endothelial cells. However, the function of IGFBP-3 in HSCs is much less clear. IGFBP-3 is found at high levels in serum, where it forms a heterotrimeric complex with IGF and the acid-labile subunit. IGFBP-3 was differentially expressed between HSC-supportive and non-sup- portive cell lines. These findings suggest that IGFBP- 3 could be one of the molecules commonly involved in the regulation of HSC behavior. Although IGFBP-3

binds IGF and modulates its availability, IGFBP-3 generates IGF-independent signaling. IGFBP-3 signals through an IGF receptor-independent pathway to phosphorylate Smad-2 and -3 and downregulate Smad-4 [38], which are involved in signaling through TGF family members. The responsible IGFBP-3 receptor, however, has not yet been identified. IGFBP-3 contains a nuclear localization sequence and IGFBP-3 binds intranuclear target genes, including p53, and retinoic acid receptor [76]. Thus, IGFBP-3 may affect HSC maintenance not only in its secreted form but also through its nuclear counterpart.

Other factors overexpressed in HSC-supportive cell lines include cathepsin K, FGF-7 (fibroblast growth factor), and pentaxin-related gene. Cathepsin K is a cysteine protease that is normally expressed by osteoclasts and that has been shown to play a role in bone resorption. One could postulate that the proteolytic activity of cathepsin K might be beneficial in the formation of the marrow niche.

After 7 days of culture on fibronectin, CD34+ mononuclear cells display an endothelial cell pheno-

88

4 I

I Pathogenesis of Retinal Vascular Disease

Chimeric C57BL6/J.gfp mice

Retinal

Iris

Choroidal

Inject one eye

Inject one eye in anterior

 

intravitreally with

chamber and intravitreally

 

rAAV-VEGF

with FGF, VEGF, IGF, and

 

 

PDGF

 

4 weeks

Immediately

 

Retinal vein photocoagulation of

Bruch’s membrane rupture;

injected eye; app. 100 burns

3 burns

3 weeks

4 weeks

2 weeks

Fix and label with rhodamine-dextran and

Fix and label with rhodamine-agglutinin

 

anti-gfp-FITC

and anti-gfp-FITC

Image

Fig. 4.5. The time course depiction of the three models of ocular neovascularization we have developed: retinal, iris, and choroidal neovascularization

type, incorporate acetylated LDL, produce nitric oxide (NO) when stimulated with VEGF, and express PECAM and Tie-2 receptor [8, 62].

Postnatal neovascularization has previously been considered synonymous with proliferation and migration of preexisting endothelial cells resident within parent vessels, i.e., angiogenesis [40]. However, the finding that bone marrow-derived cells may home to sites of neovascularization and differentiate in situ is consistent with vasculogenesis [110], a critical paradigm for the establishment of vascular networks in the embryo. Asahara identified cells derived from bone marrow capable of differentiating into neovasculature as CD34+ expressing cells [8]. CD34+ cells represent a population of EPCs. Injection of healthy CD34+ cells accelerates revascularization of ischemic limbs [117] and revascularization during wound healing in diabetic mice [121]. Thus, these cells presumably are key mediators of endothelial repair. Individuals with type I diabetes, ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and risk factors for atherosclerosis have reduced numbers of (and dysfunctional) circulating EPCs [131, 134].

We have demonstrated that HSCs provide functional hemangioblast activity during retinal neovascularization [50, 51] and that HSCs give rise to a variety of lineages including the CD34+ EPCs. This is a newly described mechanism of endothelial repair and represents a significant source of cells for neoangiogenic vessels. We postulated that defects in EPC function may be responsible for the development and persistence of acellular capillaries in diabetic retinopathy since lack of repair of acellular capillaries contributes to the development of retinal ischemia and represents an irreversible step in the pro-

gression of this disease [21, 41]. EPCs isolated from patients with Type 1 diabetes have a decreased rate of migration, and incubation with an NO donor alters the EPC cytoskeleton, normalizing their rate of migration. EPC migration can be stimulated by activation of growth factor receptors [57, 61, 69, 130, 133, 143] such as vascular endothelial growth factor 1 and 2 (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2) and cytokine receptors such as CXCR4 [30, 58, 133, 145]. These same receptors can influence NO production and are themselves regulated by NO [14, 89, 103, 123, 140]. The balance of receptor expression and activation has profound effects on the detrimental or beneficial action of the NO generated. In the diabetic state, CXCR4 and VEGFR1/R2 activation results in dysregulated and diminished NO bioavailability.

4.9Mouse Models of HSC Involvement in Ocular Neovascularization

Since one of the hallmarks of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration is retinal and choroidal neovascularization, respectively, we sought to mimic this by laser injury. In both models chimeric mice were used to provide a method to distinguish resident vasculature from the donor-derived contribution to the neovascular complex (Fig. 4.5).

4.9.1 Preretinal Neovascularization

After stable reconstitution is established, chimeric mice are injected intravitreally with a recombinant AAV vector expressing the full-length VEGF165. Four weeks later, the mice are anesthetized, their eyes