- •Contents
- •General Introduction
- •Objectives
- •Introduction
- •1 The Science of Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Optics
- •Refractive Error: Optical Principles and Wavefront Analysis
- •Measurement of Wavefront Aberrations and Graphical Representations
- •Lower-Order Aberrations
- •Higher-Order Aberrations
- •Corneal Biomechanics
- •Corneal Imaging for Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Corneal Topography
- •Corneal Tomography
- •Indications for Corneal Imaging in Refractive Surgery
- •The Role of Corneal Topography in Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Effects of Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Incisional Techniques
- •Tissue Addition or Subtraction Techniques
- •Alloplastic Material Addition Techniques
- •Collagen Shrinkage Techniques
- •Laser Biophysics
- •Laser–Tissue Interactions
- •Fundamentals of Excimer Laser Photoablation
- •Types of Photoablating Lasers
- •Corneal Wound Healing
- •2 Patient Evaluation
- •Patient History
- •Patient Expectations
- •Social History
- •Medical History
- •Pertinent Ocular History
- •Patient Age, Presbyopia, and Monovision
- •Examination
- •Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Manifest and Cycloplegic Refraction
- •Pupillary Examination
- •Ocular Motility, Confrontation Fields, and Ocular Anatomy
- •Intraocular Pressure
- •Slit-Lamp Examination
- •Dilated Fundus Examination
- •Ancillary Tests
- •Corneal Topography
- •Pachymetry
- •Wavefront Analysis
- •Calculation of Residual Stromal Bed Thickness After LASIK
- •Discussion of Findings and Informed Consent
- •3 Incisional Corneal Surgery
- •Incisional Correction of Myopia
- •Radial Keratotomy in the United States
- •Incisional Correction of Astigmatism
- •Coupling
- •Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •Instrumentation
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Ocular Surgery After Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •4 Onlays and Inlays
- •Keratophakia
- •Homoplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Alloplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Epikeratoplasty
- •Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments
- •Background
- •Instrumentation
- •Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Intacs and Keratoconus
- •One or Two Intacs Segments?
- •Complications
- •Ectasia After LASIK
- •Uses for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments After LASIK
- •Orthokeratology
- •5 Photoablation: Techniques and Outcomes
- •Excimer Laser
- •Background
- •Surface Ablation
- •LASIK
- •Wavefront-Optimized and Wavefront-Guided Ablations
- •Patient Selection for Photoablation
- •Special Considerations for Surface Ablation
- •Special Considerations for LASIK
- •Surgical Technique for Photoablation
- •Calibration of the Excimer Laser
- •Preoperative Planning and Laser Programming
- •Preoperative Preparation of the Patient
- •Preparation of the Bowman Layer or Stromal Bed for Excimer Ablation
- •Application of Laser Treatment
- •Immediate Postablation Measures
- •Postoperative Care
- •Refractive Outcomes
- •Outcomes for Myopia
- •Outcomes for Hyperopia
- •Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Treatment Outcomes for Myopia and Hyperopia
- •Re-treatment (Enhancements)
- •6 Photoablation: Complications and Adverse Effects
- •General Complications Related to Laser Ablation
- •Overcorrection
- •Undercorrection
- •Optical Aberrations
- •Central Islands
- •Decentered Ablations
- •Corticosteroid-Induced Complications
- •Central Toxic Keratopathy
- •Infectious Keratitis
- •Complications Unique to Surface Ablation
- •Persistent Epithelial Defects
- •Sterile Infiltrates
- •Corneal Haze
- •Complications Unique to LASIK
- •Microkeratome Complications
- •Epithelial Sloughing or Defects
- •Flap Striae
- •Traumatic Flap Dislocation
- •LASIK-Interface Complications
- •Visual Disturbances Related to Femtosecond Laser LASIK Flaps
- •Ectasia
- •Rare Complications
- •7 Collagen Shrinkage and Crosslinking Procedures
- •Collagen Shrinkage
- •History
- •Laser Thermokeratoplasty
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Collagen Crosslinking
- •8 Intraocular Refractive Surgery
- •Phakic Intraocular Lenses
- •Background
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Planning and Technique
- •IOL Power Calculations in Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Complications
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Toric Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Planning and Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications Specific to Toric IOLs
- •Light-Adjustable Intraocular Lenses
- •Accommodating Intraocular Lenses
- •Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Adverse Effects, Complications, and Patient Dissatisfaction with Multifocal IOLs
- •Bioptics
- •Introduction
- •Theories of Accommodation
- •Nonaccommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Monovision
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Multifocal IOL Implants
- •Custom or Multifocal Ablations
- •Corneal Intrastromal Femtosecond Laser Treatment
- •Corneal Inlays
- •Accommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Scleral Surgery
- •Femtosecond Lens Relaxation
- •Accommodating IOLs
- •Other IOL Innovations on the Horizon
- •10 Refractive Surgery in Ocular and Systemic Disease
- •Introduction
- •Ocular Conditions
- •Ocular Surface Disease
- •Herpesvirus Infection
- •Keratoconus
- •Post–Penetrating Keratoplasty
- •Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma
- •Retinal Disease
- •Amblyopia and Strabismus in Adults and Children
- •Systemic Conditions
- •Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
- •Diabetes Mellitus
- •Connective Tissue and Autoimmune Diseases
- •11 Considerations After Refractive Surgery
- •IOL Calculations After Refractive Surgery
- •Eyes With No Preoperative Information
- •The ASCRS Online Post-Refractive IOL Power Calculator
- •Retinal Detachment Repair After LASIK
- •Corneal Transplantation After Refractive Surgery
- •Contact Lens Use After Refractive Surgery
- •Indications
- •General Principles
- •Contact Lenses After Radial Keratotomy
- •Contact Lenses After Surface Ablation
- •Contact Lenses After LASIK
- •Glaucoma After Refractive Surgery
- •12 International Perspectives in Refractive Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Global Estimates of Refractive Surgery
- •International Trends in Refractive Surgery
- •Basic Texts
- •Related Academy Materials
- •Requesting Continuing Medical Education Credit
Collagen Crosslinking
The corneal collagen crosslinking procedure combines riboflavin (vitamin B2), which is a naturally occurring photosensitizer found in all human cells, with ultraviolet A (UVA) light to strengthen the biomechanical properties of the cornea. Riboflavin alone has no crosslinking effect. Its function as a photosensitizer is to serve as a source for the generation of singlet oxygen and superoxide anion free radicals, which are split from its ring structure after excitation by the UVA irradiation and which then lead to physical crosslinking of the corneal collagen fibers. In the presence of riboflavin, approximately 95% of the UVA light irradiance is absorbed in the anterior 300 µm of the corneal stroma. Therefore, most studies require a minimal corneal thickness of 400 µm after epithelial removal in order to prevent corneal endothelial damage by the UVA irradiation. Thinner corneas may be thickened temporarily with application of a hypotonic riboflavin formulation prior to UVA treatment.
Although there may also be a slight flattening of the cornea, the most important effect of collagen crosslinking is that it appears to stabilize the corneal curvature and prevent further steepening and bulging of the corneal stroma. There is no significant change in the refractive index or the clarity of the cornea. The primary clinical application of collagen crosslinking is as a treatment to prevent the progression of keratoconus and post–corneal refractive surgery ectasia.
Corneal collagen crosslinking was first described by Spörl and colleagues in 1997. In the performance of this procedure, riboflavin solution is continually applied to the eye for 30 minutes (in most studies), and the riboflavin is then activated by illumination of the cornea with UVA light for 30 minutes, during which time application of the riboflavin solution continues. The corneal epithelium is generally removed before application of the riboflavin so that riboflavin penetration is increased. Alternative riboflavin formulations and crosslinking techniques that avoid epithelial removal are being evaluated and seem promising.
Corneal collagen crosslinking is approved for use in many countries but not currently in the United States. An FDA clinical trial evaluating collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia is ongoing. In one US clinical trial, all patients with either keratoconus or postLASIK ectasia had their corneal epithelium removed, which was followed by a 30-minute application of riboflavin (0.1% diluted in 20% dextran) every 2 minutes, and a subsequent 30-minute UVA treatment (365 nm; 3 mW/cm2 irradiation), with concomitant administration of topical riboflavin as a photosensitizer (Fig 7-3). Two control groups—sham and fellow eye—were included in the study, and all patients were monitored for 1 year. Treated eyes initially showed a slight steepening of the cornea with a decrease in CDVA, followed by corneal flattening of approximately 1.00–2.00 D, which peaked at between 1 and 3 months after crosslinking. In addition to a reduction in corneal cylinder, a transient compaction of the cornea and an increase in CDVA were observed. There appears to be stabilization in most treated eyes. Some eyes may require re-treatment, and there have been rare cases of loss of 2 or more lines of best-corrected distance visual acuity in these studies, however.
Figure 7-3 Patient undergoing corneal collagen crosslinking. A, Patient preparing to undergo crosslinking of the cornea immediately prior to riboflavin application. B, After topical administration, the riboflavin fluoresces during application of UV
irradiation to the cornea. (Courtesy of Gregg J. Berdy, MD.)
Complications of corneal collagen crosslinking vary by the technique used for the procedure. They include delayed epithelial healing, corneal haze (which may be visually significant), decreased corneal sensitivity, infectious keratitis, persistent corneal edema, and endothelial cell damage.
Although crosslinking alone seems to be effective in stabilizing corneal ectatic conditions, vision rehabilitation may require additional intervention. Corneal collagen crosslinking has been used successfully in combination with other treatment methods, such as intrastromal corneal ring segments and/or excimer laser photoablation (simultaneously or sequentially) to improve the best-corrected vision in these disorders. Whereas this treatment modality has proved beneficial in the treatment of naturally occurring and laser keratorefractive ectasias, it probably should not be employed to treat ectasia resulting from incisional keratorefractive surgery; cases have been reported of incisional gaping requiring surgical repair after crosslinking of cornea that has undergone prior incisional surgery.
Collagen crosslinking is a very promising treatment modality, and studies are evaluating its place among the options for corneal therapy. In addition to conducting studies employing denuded epithelium for crosslinking, investigators are examining riboflavin penetration across intact epithelium for crosslinking. Additionally, there have been reports of collagen crosslinking employed successfully to treat fungal and bacterial infections of the cornea. This use may represent a potential new application of this technology.
Abad JC, Vargas A. Gaping of radial and transverse corneal incisions occurring early after CXL. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(12):2214–2217. Anwar HM, El-Danasoury AM, Hashem AN. Corneal collagen crosslinking in the treatment of infectious keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:1277–1280. Filippello M, Stagni E, O’Brart D. Transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking: bilateral study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:283–291.
Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(4):691–700.
Hersch PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):149–160.
Kremer I, Aizenman I, Lichter H, Shayer S, Levinger S. Simultaneous wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen crosslinking after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(10):1802–1807.
Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Sorkhabi O, Malmvall BE, Crafoord S. UVA-riboflavin photochemical therapy of bacterial keratitis: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(1): 95–102. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5): 796–801.
Spoerl E, Wollensak G, Dittert DD, Seiler T. Thermomechanical behavior of collagen-cross-linked porcine cornea. Ophthalmologica. 2004;218(2):136–140. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–
627.
