- •Contents
- •General Introduction
- •Objectives
- •Introduction
- •1 The Science of Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Optics
- •Refractive Error: Optical Principles and Wavefront Analysis
- •Measurement of Wavefront Aberrations and Graphical Representations
- •Lower-Order Aberrations
- •Higher-Order Aberrations
- •Corneal Biomechanics
- •Corneal Imaging for Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Corneal Topography
- •Corneal Tomography
- •Indications for Corneal Imaging in Refractive Surgery
- •The Role of Corneal Topography in Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Effects of Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Incisional Techniques
- •Tissue Addition or Subtraction Techniques
- •Alloplastic Material Addition Techniques
- •Collagen Shrinkage Techniques
- •Laser Biophysics
- •Laser–Tissue Interactions
- •Fundamentals of Excimer Laser Photoablation
- •Types of Photoablating Lasers
- •Corneal Wound Healing
- •2 Patient Evaluation
- •Patient History
- •Patient Expectations
- •Social History
- •Medical History
- •Pertinent Ocular History
- •Patient Age, Presbyopia, and Monovision
- •Examination
- •Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Manifest and Cycloplegic Refraction
- •Pupillary Examination
- •Ocular Motility, Confrontation Fields, and Ocular Anatomy
- •Intraocular Pressure
- •Slit-Lamp Examination
- •Dilated Fundus Examination
- •Ancillary Tests
- •Corneal Topography
- •Pachymetry
- •Wavefront Analysis
- •Calculation of Residual Stromal Bed Thickness After LASIK
- •Discussion of Findings and Informed Consent
- •3 Incisional Corneal Surgery
- •Incisional Correction of Myopia
- •Radial Keratotomy in the United States
- •Incisional Correction of Astigmatism
- •Coupling
- •Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •Instrumentation
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Ocular Surgery After Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •4 Onlays and Inlays
- •Keratophakia
- •Homoplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Alloplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Epikeratoplasty
- •Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments
- •Background
- •Instrumentation
- •Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Intacs and Keratoconus
- •One or Two Intacs Segments?
- •Complications
- •Ectasia After LASIK
- •Uses for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments After LASIK
- •Orthokeratology
- •5 Photoablation: Techniques and Outcomes
- •Excimer Laser
- •Background
- •Surface Ablation
- •LASIK
- •Wavefront-Optimized and Wavefront-Guided Ablations
- •Patient Selection for Photoablation
- •Special Considerations for Surface Ablation
- •Special Considerations for LASIK
- •Surgical Technique for Photoablation
- •Calibration of the Excimer Laser
- •Preoperative Planning and Laser Programming
- •Preoperative Preparation of the Patient
- •Preparation of the Bowman Layer or Stromal Bed for Excimer Ablation
- •Application of Laser Treatment
- •Immediate Postablation Measures
- •Postoperative Care
- •Refractive Outcomes
- •Outcomes for Myopia
- •Outcomes for Hyperopia
- •Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Treatment Outcomes for Myopia and Hyperopia
- •Re-treatment (Enhancements)
- •6 Photoablation: Complications and Adverse Effects
- •General Complications Related to Laser Ablation
- •Overcorrection
- •Undercorrection
- •Optical Aberrations
- •Central Islands
- •Decentered Ablations
- •Corticosteroid-Induced Complications
- •Central Toxic Keratopathy
- •Infectious Keratitis
- •Complications Unique to Surface Ablation
- •Persistent Epithelial Defects
- •Sterile Infiltrates
- •Corneal Haze
- •Complications Unique to LASIK
- •Microkeratome Complications
- •Epithelial Sloughing or Defects
- •Flap Striae
- •Traumatic Flap Dislocation
- •LASIK-Interface Complications
- •Visual Disturbances Related to Femtosecond Laser LASIK Flaps
- •Ectasia
- •Rare Complications
- •7 Collagen Shrinkage and Crosslinking Procedures
- •Collagen Shrinkage
- •History
- •Laser Thermokeratoplasty
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Collagen Crosslinking
- •8 Intraocular Refractive Surgery
- •Phakic Intraocular Lenses
- •Background
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Planning and Technique
- •IOL Power Calculations in Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Complications
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Toric Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Planning and Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications Specific to Toric IOLs
- •Light-Adjustable Intraocular Lenses
- •Accommodating Intraocular Lenses
- •Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Adverse Effects, Complications, and Patient Dissatisfaction with Multifocal IOLs
- •Bioptics
- •Introduction
- •Theories of Accommodation
- •Nonaccommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Monovision
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Multifocal IOL Implants
- •Custom or Multifocal Ablations
- •Corneal Intrastromal Femtosecond Laser Treatment
- •Corneal Inlays
- •Accommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Scleral Surgery
- •Femtosecond Lens Relaxation
- •Accommodating IOLs
- •Other IOL Innovations on the Horizon
- •10 Refractive Surgery in Ocular and Systemic Disease
- •Introduction
- •Ocular Conditions
- •Ocular Surface Disease
- •Herpesvirus Infection
- •Keratoconus
- •Post–Penetrating Keratoplasty
- •Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma
- •Retinal Disease
- •Amblyopia and Strabismus in Adults and Children
- •Systemic Conditions
- •Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
- •Diabetes Mellitus
- •Connective Tissue and Autoimmune Diseases
- •11 Considerations After Refractive Surgery
- •IOL Calculations After Refractive Surgery
- •Eyes With No Preoperative Information
- •The ASCRS Online Post-Refractive IOL Power Calculator
- •Retinal Detachment Repair After LASIK
- •Corneal Transplantation After Refractive Surgery
- •Contact Lens Use After Refractive Surgery
- •Indications
- •General Principles
- •Contact Lenses After Radial Keratotomy
- •Contact Lenses After Surface Ablation
- •Contact Lenses After LASIK
- •Glaucoma After Refractive Surgery
- •12 International Perspectives in Refractive Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Global Estimates of Refractive Surgery
- •International Trends in Refractive Surgery
- •Basic Texts
- •Related Academy Materials
- •Requesting Continuing Medical Education Credit
CHAPTER 7
Collagen Shrinkage and Crosslinking Procedures
Keratorefractive surgical procedures aim to alter the refractive power of the cornea by changing its shape. Various methods are used to alter corneal curvature, including incising or removing corneal tissue or implanting artificial material into the cornea. Procedures that change the character of the corneal collagen have also been developed. This chapter focuses on 2 such procedures: corneal collagen shrinkage and corneal collagen crosslinking.
Collagen Shrinkage
History
The idea of using heat to alter the shape of the cornea was first proposed by Lans, a Dutch medical student, in 1898. When Lans used electrocautery to heat the corneal stroma, he noticed astigmatic changes in the cornea. In 1975, Gasset and Kaufman proposed a modified technique known as thermokeratoplasty to treat keratoconus. In 1984, Fyodorov introduced a technique of radial thermokeratoplasty that used a handheld, heated Nichrome needle designed for deeper thermokeratoplasty. The handheld probe contained a retractable 34-gauge wire heated to 600°C. For a duration of 0.3 second, a motor advanced the wire to a preset depth of 95% of the corneal thickness. Fyodorov used different patterns to treat hyperopia and astigmatism.
However, excessive heating of the cornea resulted in necrosis and corneal remodeling, and regression and unpredictability of treatment limited the success of this technique. It is now known that the optimal temperature for avoiding stromal necrosis while still obtaining corneal collagen shrinkage is approximately 58°–76°C. Human collagen fibrils can shrink by almost two-thirds when exposed to temperatures in this range, as the heat disrupts the hydrogen bonds in the supercoiled structure of collagen. In the cornea, the maximal shrinkage is approximately 7%. When higher temperatures are reached (>78°C), tissue necrosis occurs.
Neumann AC, Fyodorov S, Sanders DR. Radial thermokeratoplasty for the correction of hyperopia. Refract Corneal Surg. 1990;6(6):404–412.
Laser Thermokeratoplasty
In the 1990s, numerous lasers were tested for use in laser thermokeratoplasty (LTK). Only the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser reached commercial production and received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. The Ho:YAG laser produces light in the infrared region at a wavelength of 2100 nm and has corneal tissue penetration to approximately 480–530 µm.
Two different delivery systems were investigated: a contact system and a noncontact version. One noncontact system approved by the FDA in 2000 used a slit-lamp delivery system to apply 8 simultaneous spots at a wavelength of 2.1 µm at a frequency of 5 Hz and a pulse duration of 250 µsec.
The system was approved for the temporary correction of 0.75–2.50 D of hyperopia with less than 1.00 D of astigmatism. The initial interest in LTK later waned, primarily because of the significant refractive regression that frequently occurred. Few LTK units, if any, remain in clinical use.
Conductive Keratoplasty
In the past decade, radiofrequency has reemerged as a method of heating the cornea. In 2002, the FDA approved the ViewPoint CK system (Refractec, Irvine, CA) for the temporary treatment of mild to moderate hyperopia with minimal astigmatism. In 2004, conductive keratoplasty (CK) received FDA approval for treatment of presbyopia in the nondominant eye of a patient with an endpoint of –1.00 to –2.00 D.
The nonablative, collagen-shrinking effect of CK is based on the delivery of radiofrequency energy through a fine conducting tip that is inserted into the peripheral corneal stroma (Fig 7-1). As the current flows through the tissue surrounding the tip, resistance to the current creates localized heat. Collagen lamellae in the area surrounding the tip shrink in a controlled fashion and form a column of denatured collagen. The shortening of the collagen fibrils creates a band of tightening that increases the curvature of the central cornea.
Figure 7-1 Schematic representation of an eye undergoing conductive keratoplasty, which delivers radiofrequency energy to the cornea through a handheld probe inserted into the peripheral cornea. (Courtesy of Refractec, Inc.)
For the treatment of hyperopia, the surgeon inserts the tip into the stroma in a ring pattern around the peripheral cornea. The number and location of spots determine the amount of refractive change, with an increasing number of spots and rings used for higher amounts of hyperopia. The CK procedure is performed using topical anesthesia and typically takes less than 5 minutes. The collagen shrinkage leads to visible striae between the treated spots, which fade with time (Fig 7-2).
Figure 7-2 One month after a 24-spot conductive keratoplasty treatment in a patient with +2.00 D hyperopia, the spots are beginning to fade. Three sets of 8 spots each were applied at a 6.0-, 7.0-, and 8.0-mm optical zones. (Courtesy of Refractec, Inc.)
Patient selection
The Refractec system is FDA approved for the temporary reduction of spherical hyperopia in patients 40 years or older with a spherical equivalent of +0.75 to +3.25 D and ≤0.75 D of astigmatism. The treatment is not advised for use in patients who have undergone radial keratotomy, and it is not FDA approved for use in patients with keratoconus, ectatic disorders, or significant irregular astigmatism. An upper limit of +1.50 D (spherical equivalent) appears to be the current treatment ceiling for this technology, and repeat applications over time or increased number of spots does not seem to enhance or increase that limit.
Safety
In the principal FDA clinical trial to date, no patient had a worse outcome than 20/40 visual acuity, and none lost more than 2 lines of vision. One patient of a total of 391 had >2.00 D of induced cylinder, and no patient with a preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA; also called best-corrected visual acuity, BCVA) of ≥20/20 had <20/25 at 1 year. Although induced cylinder of >2.00 D is an FDA safety variable, smaller amounts of induced cylinder were apparent. At 1 year, 6% of patients had >1.00 D of induced cylinder. The magnitude of the induced cylinder decreased with time. No central corneal haze was noted at 12 months, and endothelial cell counts were similar before and after the study.
Results
The clinical trial included 12-month data for 401 eyes; mean cohort age was 55.3 years (range, 40.2– 73.9 years). The mean cycloplegic spherical equivalent was +1.86 ± 0.63 D. By 12 months postoperatively, 92% of study patients had achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA; also called uncorrected visual acuity, UCVA) of 20/40 or better, 74% achieved 20/25 or better, and 54% had 20/20 or better. By 24 months postoperatively, 93% of study patients had achieved UDVA of 20/40 or better, 76% achieved 20/25 or better, and 52% had 20/20 or better. There was a slow, continued drift toward increasing hyperopia, with regression of +0.21 D and +0.48 D at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Overall, there was a 20% loss of effect after 2 years. This loss of effect is probably a combination of true regression and the normal hyperopic drift that occurs as people age. The results in the FDA CK trial for presbyopia were similar.
Despite initial reports of refractive stability, long-term follow-up has revealed regression and/or lack of adequate effect with CK. In a long-term (mean, 73.1 months; range, 44–90 months) follow-up of patients enrolled in the phase 3 multicenter trial of CK, Ehrlich and Manche found nearly complete regression of treatment effect in the 16 eyes (of the original 25 eyes) available for follow-up.
Ehrlich JS, Manche EE. Regression of effect over long-term follow-up of conductive keratoplasty to correct mild to moderate hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(9): 1591–1596.
Hersh PS. Optics of conductive keratoplasty: implications for presbyopia management. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:412–456.
Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Naoumidi TL, Kazakos DC, Giapitzakis I, Pallikaris IG. Conductive keratoplasty followed by collagen cross-linking with riboflavin-UV-A in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2010;29(2):239–243.
McDonald MB. Conductive keratoplasty: a radiofrequency-based technique for the correction of hyperopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2005;103:512–536.
Other applications
Other potential off-label uses also exist for CK. In cases of overcorrected myopic LASIK and myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), CK can be used to correct hyperopia. In these procedures, CK obviates the need to lift or cut another flap. In one report, CK was used to treat both keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia. Although corneal irregularities improved immediately, with some improvement in visual acuity, some cases showed regression of effect at 1 month. Larger studies with additional follow-up are needed.
In postcataract or postkeratoplasty patients with astigmatism, CK can be used to steepen the flat axis, because each spot is individually placed. The overall effect is still a myopic shift, so CK is particularly useful when the spherical equivalent is hyperopic. In a study of 16 patients who had CK for hyperopia after cataract surgery, 1-year follow-up data showed that CK for low to moderate postcataract hyperopia was effective and safe.
Some surgeons have also used CK in combination with collagen crosslinking in an attempt to correct the corneal curvature abnormalities in keratoconus.
Conductive keratoplasty appears to have advantages both in cost and in allowing flexible (offlabel) treatment patterns because the tip can be placed anywhere on the cornea. More experience and long-term data will be required to determine how important CK will be in the refractive surgeon’s armamentarium. Currently, however, its use remains fairly limited because of the high rate of refractive regression.
Alió JL, Ramzy MI, Galal A, Claramonte PJ. Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of residual hyperopia after LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2005;21(6):698– 704.
Claramonte PJ, Alió JL, Ramzy MI. Conductive keratoplasty to correct residual hyperopia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(9):1445– 1451.
Kolahdouz-Isfahani AH, McDonnell PJ. Thermal keratoplasty. In: Brightbill FS, ed. Corneal Surgery: Theory, Technique, and Tissue. 3rd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1999.
Kymionis GD, Kontadakis GA, Naoumidi TL, Kazakos DC, Giapitzakis I, Pallikaris IG. Conductive keratoplasty followed by collagen cross-linking with riboflavin-UV-A in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2010;29(2):239–243.
