- •Contents
- •General Introduction
- •Objectives
- •Introduction
- •1 The Science of Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Optics
- •Refractive Error: Optical Principles and Wavefront Analysis
- •Measurement of Wavefront Aberrations and Graphical Representations
- •Lower-Order Aberrations
- •Higher-Order Aberrations
- •Corneal Biomechanics
- •Corneal Imaging for Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Corneal Topography
- •Corneal Tomography
- •Indications for Corneal Imaging in Refractive Surgery
- •The Role of Corneal Topography in Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Effects of Keratorefractive Surgery
- •Incisional Techniques
- •Tissue Addition or Subtraction Techniques
- •Alloplastic Material Addition Techniques
- •Collagen Shrinkage Techniques
- •Laser Biophysics
- •Laser–Tissue Interactions
- •Fundamentals of Excimer Laser Photoablation
- •Types of Photoablating Lasers
- •Corneal Wound Healing
- •2 Patient Evaluation
- •Patient History
- •Patient Expectations
- •Social History
- •Medical History
- •Pertinent Ocular History
- •Patient Age, Presbyopia, and Monovision
- •Examination
- •Uncorrected Visual Acuity and Manifest and Cycloplegic Refraction
- •Pupillary Examination
- •Ocular Motility, Confrontation Fields, and Ocular Anatomy
- •Intraocular Pressure
- •Slit-Lamp Examination
- •Dilated Fundus Examination
- •Ancillary Tests
- •Corneal Topography
- •Pachymetry
- •Wavefront Analysis
- •Calculation of Residual Stromal Bed Thickness After LASIK
- •Discussion of Findings and Informed Consent
- •3 Incisional Corneal Surgery
- •Incisional Correction of Myopia
- •Radial Keratotomy in the United States
- •Incisional Correction of Astigmatism
- •Coupling
- •Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •Instrumentation
- •Surgical Techniques
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Ocular Surgery After Arcuate Keratotomy and Limbal Relaxing Incisions
- •4 Onlays and Inlays
- •Keratophakia
- •Homoplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Alloplastic Corneal Inlays
- •Epikeratoplasty
- •Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments
- •Background
- •Instrumentation
- •Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Intacs and Keratoconus
- •One or Two Intacs Segments?
- •Complications
- •Ectasia After LASIK
- •Uses for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments After LASIK
- •Orthokeratology
- •5 Photoablation: Techniques and Outcomes
- •Excimer Laser
- •Background
- •Surface Ablation
- •LASIK
- •Wavefront-Optimized and Wavefront-Guided Ablations
- •Patient Selection for Photoablation
- •Special Considerations for Surface Ablation
- •Special Considerations for LASIK
- •Surgical Technique for Photoablation
- •Calibration of the Excimer Laser
- •Preoperative Planning and Laser Programming
- •Preoperative Preparation of the Patient
- •Preparation of the Bowman Layer or Stromal Bed for Excimer Ablation
- •Application of Laser Treatment
- •Immediate Postablation Measures
- •Postoperative Care
- •Refractive Outcomes
- •Outcomes for Myopia
- •Outcomes for Hyperopia
- •Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Treatment Outcomes for Myopia and Hyperopia
- •Re-treatment (Enhancements)
- •6 Photoablation: Complications and Adverse Effects
- •General Complications Related to Laser Ablation
- •Overcorrection
- •Undercorrection
- •Optical Aberrations
- •Central Islands
- •Decentered Ablations
- •Corticosteroid-Induced Complications
- •Central Toxic Keratopathy
- •Infectious Keratitis
- •Complications Unique to Surface Ablation
- •Persistent Epithelial Defects
- •Sterile Infiltrates
- •Corneal Haze
- •Complications Unique to LASIK
- •Microkeratome Complications
- •Epithelial Sloughing or Defects
- •Flap Striae
- •Traumatic Flap Dislocation
- •LASIK-Interface Complications
- •Visual Disturbances Related to Femtosecond Laser LASIK Flaps
- •Ectasia
- •Rare Complications
- •7 Collagen Shrinkage and Crosslinking Procedures
- •Collagen Shrinkage
- •History
- •Laser Thermokeratoplasty
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Collagen Crosslinking
- •8 Intraocular Refractive Surgery
- •Phakic Intraocular Lenses
- •Background
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Planning and Technique
- •IOL Power Calculations in Refractive Lens Exchange
- •Complications
- •Advantages
- •Disadvantages
- •Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Toric Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Planning and Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Complications Specific to Toric IOLs
- •Light-Adjustable Intraocular Lenses
- •Accommodating Intraocular Lenses
- •Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
- •Patient Selection
- •Surgical Technique
- •Outcomes
- •Adverse Effects, Complications, and Patient Dissatisfaction with Multifocal IOLs
- •Bioptics
- •Introduction
- •Theories of Accommodation
- •Nonaccommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Monovision
- •Conductive Keratoplasty
- •Multifocal IOL Implants
- •Custom or Multifocal Ablations
- •Corneal Intrastromal Femtosecond Laser Treatment
- •Corneal Inlays
- •Accommodative Treatment of Presbyopia
- •Scleral Surgery
- •Femtosecond Lens Relaxation
- •Accommodating IOLs
- •Other IOL Innovations on the Horizon
- •10 Refractive Surgery in Ocular and Systemic Disease
- •Introduction
- •Ocular Conditions
- •Ocular Surface Disease
- •Herpesvirus Infection
- •Keratoconus
- •Post–Penetrating Keratoplasty
- •Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma
- •Retinal Disease
- •Amblyopia and Strabismus in Adults and Children
- •Systemic Conditions
- •Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
- •Diabetes Mellitus
- •Connective Tissue and Autoimmune Diseases
- •11 Considerations After Refractive Surgery
- •IOL Calculations After Refractive Surgery
- •Eyes With No Preoperative Information
- •The ASCRS Online Post-Refractive IOL Power Calculator
- •Retinal Detachment Repair After LASIK
- •Corneal Transplantation After Refractive Surgery
- •Contact Lens Use After Refractive Surgery
- •Indications
- •General Principles
- •Contact Lenses After Radial Keratotomy
- •Contact Lenses After Surface Ablation
- •Contact Lenses After LASIK
- •Glaucoma After Refractive Surgery
- •12 International Perspectives in Refractive Surgery
- •Introduction
- •Global Estimates of Refractive Surgery
- •International Trends in Refractive Surgery
- •Basic Texts
- •Related Academy Materials
- •Requesting Continuing Medical Education Credit
perpendicular to the laser (parallel to the ground)—and that there is no head tilt. Treatment of decentration with topography-guided technology may be effective.
Figure 6-3 Corneal topography findings of a decentered ablation. (Courtesy of Roger F. Steinert, MD.)
Corticosteroid-Induced Complications
The incidence of increased intraocular pressure (IOP) after surface ablation has been reported to range from 11% to 25%. Occasionally, the IOP may be quite high. In 1 study, 2% of patients had IOP greater than 40 mm Hg. The majority of cases of elevated IOP are associated with prolonged topical corticosteroid therapy. Accordingly, postoperative steroid-associated IOP elevations are more likely to occur after surface ablation (after which steroid therapy may be used 2–4 months to prevent postoperative corneal haze) or after complicated LASIK cases. Corticosteroid-induced elevated IOP occurs in 1.5%–3.0% of patients using fluorometholone but in up to 25% of patients using dexamethasone. The increase in IOP is usually controlled with topical IOP-lowering medications and typically normalizes after the corticosteroids are decreased or discontinued. Because of the changes in corneal curvature and/or corneal thickness, Goldmann tonometry readings after myopic surface ablation and LASIK are artifactually reduced (see Glaucoma After Refractive Surgery in Chapter 11). Several alternative techniques of measuring IOP have been suggested, but dynamic contour tonometry is the only technique shown to have sufficient reproducible accuracy in eyes after refractive ablation. Other corticosteroid-associated complications that have been reported after surface ablation are
herpes simplex virus keratitis, ptosis, and cataracts.
Central Toxic Keratopathy
Central toxic keratopathy is a rare, acute, noninflammatory central corneal opacification that can occur within days after uneventful LASIK or PRK (Fig 6-4). The etiology is unknown but may be related to enzymatic degradation of keratocytes.
Figure 6-4 Clinical photograph of central toxic keratopathy, a rare, acute, noninflammatory central corneal opacification that can occur within days after uneventful LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). (Courtesy of Parag Majmudar, MD.)
Confocal microscopy has demonstrated activated keratocytes without inflammatory cells, with initial keratocyte loss from the stromal bed and gradual repopulation over time. Central toxic keratopathy has been reported to demonstrate anterior curvature flattening without alteration of posterior curvature in anterior segment tomography; however, some cases do appear to alter all tomographic findings, likely as measurement artifact. The onset is acute without worsening over time, unlike in most other interface entities.
Moshirfar M, Hazin R, Khalifa YM. Central toxic keratopathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010; 21(4):274–279.
Thornton IL, Foulks GN, Eiferman RA. Confocal microscopy of central toxic keratopathy. Cornea. 2012;31(8):934–936.
Infectious Keratitis
Infectious keratitis may occur after surface ablation procedures or LASIK, as both types of surgery involve disturbance of the ocular surface, although infections are significantly more common after surface ablation. The risk of infection varies depending on the specific technique. The most common etiologic agents for these infections are gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus viridans. Although health care workers and others exposed in hospital and nursing home settings may be at greatest risk for MRSA infection, MRSA infections have been diagnosed in increasing numbers of cases without known risk factors. Atypical mycobacteria, Nocardia asteroides, and fungi have also been reported to cause infectious keratitis after surface ablation and LASIK (Fig 6-5).
Figure 6-5 Slit-beam image of Mycobacterium chelonae interface infection presenting 3 weeks after LASIK; this infection was initially treated as diffuse lamellar keratitis with topical corticosteroids. (Courtesy of Christopher J. Rapuano, MD.)
PRK and other surface ablation techniques involve creation of an iatrogenic corneal epithelial defect that may take 3–5 days to heal. During this time, the risk of postoperative infectious keratitis is greatest because of exposure of the stroma, use of a bandage contact lens, and administration of topical steroid drops, all of which increase the opportunity for eyelid and conjunctival bacterial flora to gain access to the stroma. Treatment of postoperative infectious keratitis consists of culture and sensitivity testing of contact lens and corneal scrapings and institution of appropriate intensive, topical, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, being cognizant of the higher prevalence of keratitis secondary to gram-positive organisms. Antibiotics may include a combination of the following:
fourth-generation fluoroquinolones, polymyxin B–trimethoprim, fortified vancomycin or cefazolin, and for tified tobramycin or gentamicin. Fungal keratitis can also occur, especially with concomitant corticosteroid use. With that in mind, cultures should include fungal assays, and treatment for keratitis should include antifungals in suspected cases.
During or shortly after LASIK, which involves creation of a corneal flap, eyelid and conjunctival flora may enter and remain sequestered under the flap. The antimicrobial components in the tears and in topically applied antibiotic drops have difficulty penetrating into the deep stroma to reach the organisms (Fig 6-6). If a post-LASIK infection is suspected, the flap should be lifted and the stromal bed scraped for culture and sensitivity testing. Intensive treatment with topical antibiotic drops, as described previously, should be started pending culture results. If there is lack of clinical progress, additional scrapings may be obtained, the flap may be amputated, and the antibiotic regimen altered.
Figure 6-6 Infectious keratitis in a LASIK flap after recurrent epithelial abrasion. (Courtesy of Jayne S. Weiss, MD.)
Llovet F, de Rojas V, Interlandi E, et al. Infectious keratitis in 204,586 LASIK procedures. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(3):232–238. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Moshirfar M, Welling JD, Feiz V, Holz H, Clinch TE. Infectious and noninfectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis: occurrence, management, and
visual outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(3):474–483.
Mozayan A, Madu A, Channa P. Laser in-situ keratomileusis infection: review and update of current practices. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22(4):233–237. Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infectious keratitis following refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol.
2007;143(4):629–634. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
Wroblewski KJ, Pasternak JF, Bower KS, et al. Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy in the United States Army and Navy. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):520–525. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
