Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
16.49 Mб
Скачать

blockers are more likely to be beneficial. (See Chapter 8.)

Bhandari A, Crabb DP, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Noureddin BN. Effect of surgery on visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(7):1131–1137.

Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487– 497.

Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):498–505.

Mikelberg FS. Normal tension glaucoma. Focal Points: Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2000, module 12.

The Glaucoma Suspect

A glaucoma suspect is defined as an individual who has an optic nerve or nerve fiber layer defect suggestive of glaucoma (enlarged cup–disc ratio, asymmetric cup–disc ratio, notching or narrowing of the neuroretinal rim, a disc hemorrhage, or suspicious alteration in the nerve fiber layer) in the absence of an abnormality in visual function as determined by perimetry; or who has a visual field abnormality consistent with glaucoma in the absence of a corresponding glaucomatous optic disc abnormality. Patients with such findings are typically monitored for the development of glaucoma with periodic evaluation of the optic nerve, retinal nerve fiber layer, and visual field. The increasing use of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry, as well as assessment of the pattern electroretinogram, may improve the ophthalmologist’s ability to recognize early glaucomatous visual function loss in patients considered to be glaucoma suspects because of a suspicious optic disc appearance (see Chapter 3). If signs of optic nerve damage are present, the diagnosis of early POAG should be considered and treatment initiated. However, in uncertain cases, the ophthalmologist should not hesitate to closely monitor patients without therapy to confirm either initial findings or progressive change, with the aim of better establishing the diagnosis prior to initiating therapy. It may be difficult to classify a glaucoma suspect who has elevated IOP and structural or functional findings that are suggestive but not firmly diagnostic of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Such patients do not fit neatly into one diagnostic category.

Ocular Hypertension

Some authors consider patients with OHT to be glaucoma suspects. In this book, we define OHT as a condition in which the IOP is elevated above an arbitrary cutoff value, typically 21 mm Hg, in the absence of optic disc, retinal nerve fiber layer, or visual field abnormalities. Estimates of the prevalence of OHT vary considerably; some authorities believe the prevalence of OHT may be as high as 8 times that of definite POAG. Analysis of studies that have observed individuals with elevated IOP for variable periods indicates that the higher the baseline IOP, the greater the risk of developing glaucoma. However, it is important to note that even among individuals with elevated IOP, the majority never develop glaucoma.

Differentiating between diagnoses of OHT and early POAG is often difficult. The ophthalmologist must look carefully for signs of early damage to the optic nerve, such as focal notching, asymmetry of cupping, optic disc hemorrhage, nerve fiber layer defects, or subtle visual field defects.

There is no clear consensus about whether elevated IOP should be treated in the absence of signs of early damage. Some clinicians, after assessing all risk factors, select and treat those individuals

thought to be at greatest risk of developing glaucoma. In OHTS, patients 40–80 years of age with IOP between 24 and 32 mm Hg were randomized to observation or to the reduction of IOP by topical medications (Fig 4-1; see Clinical Trial 4-2 at the end of this chapter). In this study, 4.4% of patients treated (with topical glaucoma medications to reduce IOP 20%) progressed to glaucoma during a 5- year period, based on the development of optic nerve or visual field damage. More than twice as many of the untreated observation group, or 9.5%, progressed. Thus, topical medications were definitively shown to reduce the risk of progression to glaucoma in patients with OHT; however, most untreated patients did not get worse over a 5-year period. Each millimeter of mercury of elevated baseline IOP increased the risk of glaucomatous change by 10%. For each 0.1 increment in vertical cup–disc ratio, the risk was increased by 32%.

Figure 4-1 The number and percentage of participants in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study observation group that developed primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) as a function of baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal

thickness (CCT). (Reprinted with permission from Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:718, Fig 1. Copyrighted 2002, American Medical Association.)

OHTS identified older age, higher IOP, lower CCT, higher pattern standard deviation on standard automated perimetry, and higher cup–disc ratio at baseline as important risk factors for the development of POAG. Data from OHTS and the European Glaucoma Prevention Study were combined to create a risk calculation model to predict the 5-year risk of conversion from OHT to glaucoma based on these risk factors.

It has been recognized that variations in CCT affect the IOP measurement. For example, a thicker cornea resists indentation by applanation, resulting in a higher IOP reading. But the increased risk of progression attributed to lower CCT in OHTS was not fully explained by the estimated artifactual error in measured IOP. It is therefore hypothesized that lower CCT may be a marker for other susceptibility factors. Other potential risk factors, such as myopia, diabetes mellitus, positive family