Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
7.89 Mб
Скачать

176 Ferenc Kuhn

Fig. 2.2.8  Closure of the star-shaped wound. a The corneal wound from the surgeon’s view. b The initial suture is an intrastromal one in the center (top: surgeon’s view; bottom: cross-sec- tional view). The intrastromal suture is placed roughly at mid-depth. It is a permanent suture (i.e., never to be removed). c Enlarged view of b, top. d The intrastromal suture brought all wound edges together, and have created several individual wounds, which are now dealt with one at a time. This is done in a way determined by the location and length of the individual wounds (see earlier). These sutures are full thickness. Top: surgeon’s view; bottom: cross-sec- tional view

  2.2  Cornea

177

Fig. 2.2.9  Closure of perpendicular vs oblique (shelved) wounds. a If the wound’s plane is close to vertical as it relates to the surface1, the needle’s entry and exit points should be at equal distance from the wound on both the epithelial and endothelial corneal surfaces (x1=y1) and (x2=y2). b If the wound’s plane is oblique, use of full-thickness sutures becomes especially crucial. The distances as measured for needle entry and exit relative to the edge of the wound need to be modified so as to create the same compression on either side. As shown, the epithelial distance on one side is matched up with the endothelial distance on the other side (x1=y2) and (x1=y2). This technique prevents tissue override, which is a permanent2 abnormality

1 Which is the majority of the cases

2  i.e., it does not disappear with suture removal

178 Ferenc Kuhn

Fig. 2.2.10  Closure of a complex, angled corneal wound. The wound that has two angles should be considered as three separate wounds. To achieve this, the single wound is first divided into three by placing the first two sutures at the angles (as in Fig. 2.2.5c). The two peri­ pheral wounds are closed then, and the central part last. The numbers represent the order of suture placement

Fig. 2.2.11  Closure of a small corneal wound. Closure is correct here in terms of suture length (longer in the periphery and shorter in the center); however, the knots still need to be buried, and leaving the tags too long makes this difficult. The tags may also cause additional problems once turned into the AC

  2.2  Cornea

179

Fig. 2.2.12  Closure of a long corneal wound. A properly closed wound., note that the sutures are longer in the periphery and that scar formation is minimal (Courtesy of B. Hamill)

Fig. 2.2.13  Closure of a long corneal wound. A similarly long wound as in Fig. 2.2.11; however, the suture bites are arbitrary in terms of length, and introduction sequence is also presumed to have been haphazard. Suture placement was obviously not based on a carefully designed plan. Furthermore, the sutures are too tight, making the surface uneven (bulging wound edges). It will take a long time for this cornea to clear, and permanent visual impairment is inevitable

180 Ferenc Kuhn

Fig. 2.2.14  Corneal blood staining. This wound was closed with evenly spaced sutures, which appears esthetical but causes flattening. Nonetheless, closure technique in this case has relatively little significance. The cornea has become nontransparent due to blood staining; posterior segment surgery is impossible without using the TKP (see Chap. 2.15), making PK unavoidable1

1  Endoscopy is also an option (see Chap. 2.20), but it is doubtful that this cornea will escape the need for a PK.

Fig. 2.2.15  Scar formation following closure of a corneal wound. Although scarring cannot be avoided once the wound is deeper than the epithelium, it can be minimized by proper suturing techniques and the judicious use of corticosteroids postoperatively

  2.2  Cornea

181

2.2.3.7Scar Management

If the scar is in the visual axis or causes major distortion of the cornea’s curvature, surgical intervention may be necessary to alleviate the undesirable consequences. Even deep scars may be treated with PTK [10]; otherwise, surgical excision, including PK, may be employed.

2.2.3.8Suture Removal

If full-thickness sutures have been used (Fig. 2.2.6b), certain precautions must be taken to prevent endophthalmitis development following suture removal.

Z

DO:

master the techniques of examining the cornea at the slit lamp

have increased concern for injuries with little or no pain

be careful not to push a deep corneal FB into the AC by inappropriate removal techniques

plan all aspects of wound closure before introducing any suture into the cornea

make use of the benefits of full-thickness sutures

DON’T:

hesitate to start a new therapy if on current management the corneal erosion keeps recurring

neglect to consider all posttreatment eventualities (such as rubbing of the eye) when deciding whether to suture an apparently self-sealing partial-thickness laceration

forget the need to prepare the eye as if it were undergoing an intraocular procedure when a full-thickness suture is to be removed

182 Ferenc Kuhn

Summary

The cornea is the most commonly injured ocular tissue. In most cases, pain is inversely proportional to significance. Full-thickness wounds are of major concern since they represent increased endophthalmitis and ECH risk. Improper treatment of the corneal injury can result in visual

impairment because of several factors ranging from an unnecessarily prominent scar to vitrectomy delayed too long because of undue corneal edema. Scleral and corneal wounds have very different implications; this is discussed in Chap. 2.11.

References

[1]Banerjee A (1990) Effectiveness of eye protection in the metal working industry. Br Med J 301: 645−646

[2]Barr C (1983) Prognostic factors in corneoscleral lacerations. Arch Ophthalmol 101: 919−924

[3]Birkhimer L, Jacobson P, Olson J, Goyette D (1984) Ocular scopolamine-induced psychosis. J Fam Pract 18: 464−466

[4]Bowman R, Yorston D, Aitchison T, McIntyre B, Kirkness C (1999) Traumatic wound rupture after penetrating keratoplasty in Africa. Br J Ophthalmol 83: 530−534

[5]Campos M, Lee M, McDonnell P (1992) Ocular integrity after refractive surgery: effects of photorefractive keratectomy, phototherapeutic keratectomy, and radial keratotomy. Ophthal Surg: 598−602

[6]Chang P, Soong H, Barnett J (1991) Corneal penetrations by tarantula hairs. Br J Ophthalmol 75: 253−254

[7]Chaudhry N, Smiddy W (1998) Displacement of corneal cap during vitrectomy in a post-LASIK eye. Retina 18: 554−555

[8]Chiapella A, Rosenthal A (1985) One year in eye casualty. Br J Ophthalmol 69: 865−870

[9]Dangel M, Kestes R (1980) The adjustable slipknot. An alternative technique. Ophthalmic Surg 12: 843−846

[10]Dogru M, Katakami C, Miyashita M, Hida E, Uenishi M, Tetsumoto K, Kanno S, Nishida T, Yamanaka A (2000) Visual and tear function improvement after superficial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) for mid-stromal corneal scarring. Eye 14: 779−784

[11]Dursun D, Kim MC, Solomon A, Pflugfelder SC (2001) Treatment of recalcitrant recurrent corneal erosions with inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase-9, doxycycline and corticosteroids. Am J Ophthalmol 132: 8−13

  2.2  Cornea

183

[12]Elder M, Stack R (2004) Globe rupture following penetrating keratoplasty: How often, why, and what can we do to prevent it? Cornea 23: 776−780

[13]Ernest P, Lavery K, Kiessling L (1994) Relative strength of scleral corneal and clear corneal incisions constructed in cadaver eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 20: 626−629

[14]Gasset A, Dohlman C (1968) The tensile strength of corneal wounds. Arch Ophthalmol 79: 595−602

[15]Heier J, Enzenauer R, Wintermeyer S (1993) Ocular injuries and disease at a combat supported hospital in support of operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. Arch Ophthalmol 111: 795−798

[16]John M, Van der Karr M, Noblitt R (1984) Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy for treatment of recurrent erosion. J Cataract Refract Surg 20: 179−181

[17]Katz H, Snyder M, Green W (1994) Nd:YAG laser photo-induced adhesion of the corneal epithelium. Am J Ophthalmol 118: 612−612

[18]Kirkpatrick J, Hoh H, Cook S (1993) No eye pad for corneal abrasion. Eye 7: 468−471

[19]Kuhn F, Heimann K (1991) Ein neuer Dauermagnet zur Entfernung intraokularer ferromagnetischer Fremdkoerper. Klin Mbl Augenheilk 198: 301−303

[20]Kuhn F, Mester V, Berta A, Morris R (1998) Epidemiology of serious ocular trauma: The United States Eye Injury Registry (USEIR) and the Hungarian Eye Injury Registry (HEIR). Ophthalmologe 95: 332−343

[21]Kuhn F, Morris R, Mester V (2001) Choroidal detachment and expulsive choroidal hemorrhage. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 14: 639−650

[22]Lesher M, Durrie D, Stiles M (1993) Corneal edema, hyphema, and angle recession after air bag inflation. Arch Ophthalmol 111: 1320−1322

[23]Lindquist T (1992) Complications of corneal refractive surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin 32: 97−114

[24]Lord RK, Price FW, Price MO, Werner L, Mamalis N (2006) Histology of posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 25: 1093−1096

[25]Mackool R, Russell R (1996) Strength of clear corneal incisions in cadaver eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 22: 721−725

[26]Maloney W, Colvard M, Bourne W (1979) Specular microscopy of traumatic posterior annular keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 97: 1647−1650

[27]Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J (2006) Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25: 987−990

[28]Mönestam E, Björnstig U (1991) Eye injuries in northern Sweden. Acta Ophthalmol 69: 1−5

[29]Moschos M, Droutsas D, Boussalis P, Tsioulias G (1996) Clinical experience with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Doc Ophthalmol 93: 237−245

[30]Pfister R, Burnstein N (1976) The effects of ophthalmic drugs, vehicles, and preservatives on corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscope study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15: 246−259

184 Ferenc Kuhn

[31]Pinheiro MJ, Bryant M, Tayyanipour R, Nassaralla B, Wee W, McDonnell P (1995) Corneal integrity after refractive surgery. Effects of radial keratotomy and mini-ra- dial keratotomy. Ophthalmology 102: 297−301

[32]Reyes JM, Herretes S, Pirouzmanesh A, Wang D, Elisseeff J, Jun A, McDonnell P, Chuck R, Behrens A (2005) A modified chondroitin sulfate aldehyde adhesive for sealing corneal incisions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 1247−1250

[33]Roberson M, Wicheta W (1985) Endothelial loss in corneal concussion injury. Ann Ophthalmol 17: 457−458

[34]Rowsey J, Hays J (1984) Refractive reconstruction for acute eye injuries. Ophthalmic Surg 15: 569−574

[35]Rubinfeld R, Laibson P, Cohen E (1990) Anterior stromal puncture for recurrent erosion: further experience and new instrumentation. Ophthalmic Surg 21: 318−326

[36]Schmack I, Dawson D, McCarey B, Waring G, Grossniklaus H, Edelhauser H (2005) Cohesive tensile strength of human LASIK wounds with histologic, ultrastructural, and clinical correlations. J Refr Surg 433−445

[37]Sharma A, Kaur R, Kumar S, Gupta P, Pandav S, Patnaik B, Gupta A (2003) Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 110: 291−298

[38]Stern G, Schemmer G, Farber R (1983) Effect of topical antibiotic solutions on corneal epithelial wound healing. Arch Ophthalmol 101: 644−647

[39]Su CY, Lin CP (2000) Combined use of an amniotic membrane and tissue adhesive in treating corneal perforation: a case report. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 31: 151−154

[40]Terry M, Ousley P (2006) Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: early complications and their management. Cornea 25: 37−43

[41]Tseng S, Lin S, Chen F (1999) Traumatic wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty: clinical features and outcome in 21 cases. Cornea 18: 553−558

[42]Tsubota K, Goto E, Shimmura S, Shimazaki J (1999) Treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defect by autologous serum application. Ophthalmology 106: 1984−1989

[43]Uchio E, Watanabe Y, Kadonosono K, Matsuoka Y, Goto S (2003) Simulation of airbag impact on eyes after photorefractive keratectomy by finite element analysis method. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241: 497−504

[44]Vinger PF (2002) Injury to the postsurgical eye. In: Kuhn F, Pieramici D (eds) Ocular trauma: principles and practice. Thieme, New York, pp 280−292

[45]Vote BJ, Elder MJ (2000) Cyanoacrylate glue for corneal perforations: a description of a surgical technique and a review of the literature. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 28: 437−442

[46]Weene L (1985) Recurrent corneal erosion after trauma: a statistical study. Ann Ophthalmol 17: 521−524

[47]Zuckerman B, Lieberman T (1960) Corneal rust ring. Arch Ophthalmol 63: 254−264

  2.3  Sclera and Limbus

Ferenc Kuhn

2.3.1Introduction

While playing only limited and indirect role in vision, the sclera is responsible for much of the globe’s strength and integrity. The proximity of the scleral “shell” to vital tissues such as the choroid, ciliary body, and the retina gives it significant clinical implications. Compared with most ocular tissues, the sclera has few pathologies. The limbus is one of the loci minoris resistantiae of the globe , which is further excerbated by the fact that it is often the site of elective surgical incisions.

2.3.2Evaluation

Through the usually transparent conjunctiva, it is typically possible to directly inspect the limbus and the anterior sclera with the naked eye, but especially at the slit lamp. Subconjunctival hemorrhage, among other pathologies, however, can interfere with direct inspection of the sclera, making it necessary to use radiological tests (most importantly, CT), ultrasonography, or even exploratory surgery (see Chap. 1.9).

e.g., an improperly sutured anterior scleral or limbal wound can cause significant astigmia

As is the area at the insertion of the extraocular muscles (see Chap. 2.12)