Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma
.pdf
Principles and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
337 |
|
setting, there remain many eyes that cannot be |
A. Inert: Metals like gold, silver and platinum are |
|
|
salvaged. A primary enucleation is usually only |
inert in nature and are tolerated well in the eye |
|
|
considered in eyes that are beyond primary repair. |
for long periods. |
|
|
Delayed repair, lens disruption, extent of wound, |
B. Toxic: Metals like iron copper and lead are toxic |
|
|
vitreous prolapse, posterior location of the wound, |
in nature and requires immediate removal. |
|
|
foreign body and rural setting are the known risk |
Copper is the most injurious metal to the eye. |
|
|
factors for poor visual outcome in ocular trauma. In |
2. Inorganic non-metals: Stone, glass, porcelain |
|
|
an Indian study by Narang et al incidence of open |
are relatively inert and may be tolerated by the |
|
|
|
|||
globe injuries and the outcome in children, and the |
eye. |
|
|
risk factors for post-traumatic endophthalmitis was |
3. Organic: Wood and vegetable matter of foreign |
|
|
studied. It was concluded from the study that delayed |
bodies are commonly associated with agricultural |
|
|
repair, bow and arrow injuries and household injuries |
trauma and result in severe endophthalmitis and |
|
|
were associated with significantly higher risk of |
poor visual outcome. |
|
|
endophthalmitis. The incidence of endophthalmitis can |
|
|
|
be reduced by early referral of trauma cases and |
EVALUATION OF A PATIENT WITH IOFB |
|
|
parental supervision. |
|
||
History |
|
||
To conclude, open globe injuries can be present |
|
||
in varying severity and though the overall prognosis |
A few direct questions should be sufficient for the |
|
|
is grave, prompt surgical intervention can result in |
ophthalmologist to suspect the presence of an IOFB |
|
|
better visual outcome. |
in eyes with an open globe injury. In case of doubt, |
|
|
|
it is advisable to err on the side of an IOFB presence. |
|
|
Intraocular Foreign Body |
The most common cause for litigation against the |
|
|
ophthalmologist in a trauma case is a missed IOFB. |
|
||
|
It is important to remember that the patient may be |
|
|
Intraocular foreign body represents a subset of open |
|
||
unaware of any object entering (even striking) the eye, |
|
||
globe injury that involves both anterior and posterior |
|
||
and the vision may be unaffected initially. Sometimes |
|
||
segments of the eye. An intraocular foreign body may |
|
||
the circumstances (e.g. polytrauma cases) divert |
|
||
traumatize the eye mechanically, introduce infection |
|
||
primary attention towards systemic evaluation and |
|
||
or exert toxic effects intraocularly. Foreign body may |
|
||
management sidelining the ocular assessment, e.g. |
|
||
be lodged anywhere from anterior segment to retina |
|
||
road traffic accident, blast injuries, which commonly |
|
||
and choroid. Notable mechanical effects include |
|
||
result in multiple IOFBs' (Fig. 53.5). |
|
||
cataract formation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal tears |
|
|
|
and hemorrhage. Due to their high velocity, most of |
Ocular Examination |
|
|
the IOFB's come to lie in the posterior segment of the |
|
||
A complete examination of both the eyes is necessary, |
|
||
eye. |
|
||
including the visual acuity and the presence of relative |
|
||
Intraocular foreign bodies occur in 18 to 41% of |
|
||
afferent pupillary defect. When pupil in the traumatized |
|
||
the open globe injuries. Most patients are young males |
|
||
eye cannot be examined, a reverse RAPD in the fellow |
|
||
in 3rd and 4th decades. Commonest case is an occupa- |
|
||
|
|
|
|
tional hazard involving hammering metal or stone. |
|
|
|
Sharp particles require less energy to penetrate the |
|
|
|
eye as compared to blunt particles resulting in lesser |
|
|
|
degree of damage to ocular tissues. In contrast blunt |
|
|
|
objects like gun pellets require much more energy to |
|
|
|
penetrate the eye resulting in severe ocular tissue |
|
|
|
destruction. |
|
|
|
Smaller size is difficult to detect but easier to |
|
|
|
remove. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy is common |
|
|
|
with larger IOFB's. |
|
|
|
COMPOSITION |
|
|
|
IOFB's may be grouped into 3 types according to their |
|
|
|
composition |
|
|
|
1. Metallic: 80-90% of IOFBs' out of which 55-80% |
|
|
|
are magnetic in nature. |
Fig. 53.5: Fundus photograph showing Metallic IOFB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
eye is a poor prognostic sign. A corneal entry wound |
• Ultrasound is a useful tool in localizing IOFB's, and |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
and a hole in the iris provide trajectory information. |
its careful use is possible even if the globe is still |
|
|
|
Localized conjunctival chemosis strongly suggests |
open; alternatively, intraoperative use after wound |
|
|
|
perforation. Most common site of entry for IOFB is |
closure can be attempted. USG is very effective |
|
|
|
cornea (65%) followed by sclera (25%) and limbus |
in detecting radiolucent IOFB, assessing the status |
|
|
|
(10%). A corneal passage is usually accompanied by |
of retina, vitreous, choroids and optic nerve and |
|
|
|
iris hole and traumatic cataract which reduces the |
detecting globe perforation. IOFB appears as high |
|
|
|
velocity of IOFB and decreases the damage potential. |
density echo which persists at a low gain and |
|
|
||||
|
|
A scleral entry allows the foreign body to retain its |
shadowing of the retina choroids sclera complex. |
|
|
|
momentum which therefore causes more damage. |
Ringing bell phenomenon may be seen. The ultra- |
|
|
|
Most eyes have a single IOFB. Multiple IOFB's are |
sound biomicroscope may help with IOFB's in the |
|
|
|
usually associated with firearm or blast injuries. The |
anterior segment or angle of anterior chamber. |
|
|
|
slit lamp is extremely useful in detailing all anterior |
|
|
|
|
segment pathologies. The indirect ophthalmoscope |
Other Tests |
|
|
|
through a dilated pupil may allow direct visualization |
Electroretinography is useful if a chronic IOFB is found |
|
|
|
of the IOFB, which gives the most useful information |
||
|
|
and siderosis is either suspected or present. Four stages |
||
|
|
for the surgeon. Gonioscopy and scleral depression |
||
|
|
are recognized: initially, a and b waves are normal or |
||
|
|
are not recommended unless the entry wound has |
||
|
|
supernormal. Later, a wave is larger and b wave |
||
|
|
been surgically closed. |
||
|
|
smaller. Still later, b wave becomes subnormal in |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lab Studies |
amplitude. Eventually, ERG becomes non-recordable. |
|
|
|
These changes can be reversed by IOFB removal |
||
|
|
Culture an IOFB or a sample of vitreous if an infection |
before the b wave amplitude is significantly reduced. |
|
|
|
is suspected. Remember that a positive result does not |
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY |
|
|
|
mean that an infection is occurring and that a negative |
||
|
|
result does not preclude the possibility of endophthal- |
The final resting place of and the severity of damage |
|
|
|
mitis. |
caused by an IOFB depend on several factors, |
|
|
|
Imaging Studies |
including the size, the shape, and the momentum of |
|
|
|
the object at the time of impact, as well as the site |
||
|
|
They are useful to detect the presence and localization |
of ocular penetration. |
|
|
|
of IOFBs' in presence of opaque media such as cataract |
IOFB primarily damages the ocular tissue mecha- |
|
|
|
or vitreous hemorrhage. |
nically. The injuries include corneal/scleral perforation, |
|
|
|
• |
Plain X-ray of orbit is the simplest and readily |
cataract formation, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal tears |
|
|
|
available tool for IOFB detection. It is useful if a |
and hemorrhage. In addition to the initial damage |
|
|
|
metallic IOFB is present and a CT scan is unavailable. |
caused at the time of impact, the risk of endophthalmitis |
|
|
|
However, it is difficult to ascertain the intra/extra |
and subsequent scarring play an important role in the |
|
|
|
planning of the surgical intervention. Retained metallic |
|
|
|
|
ocular location of foreign body. Another dis- |
|
|
|
|
IOFB additionally results in a delayed chemical injury, |
|
|
|
|
advantage of plain X-ray is that small metallic and |
|
|
|
|
metallosis bulbi, caused by electrolytic dissociation of |
|
|
|
|
nonmetallic IOFB are frequently missed. |
|
|
|
|
metal ions. These ions react with the tissues and cause |
|
|
|
• CT scans are the test of choice for IOFB localiza- |
||
|
|
oxidative damage that interrupts cell function by |
||
|
|
|
tion. It allows detection of IOFB 0.5 mm or more |
|
|
|
|
altering cell membrane permeability and lysosomal |
|
|
|
|
in diameter. Though 3 mm cuts allow rapid |
|
|
|
|
breakdown. The common metals that dissociate in this |
|
|
|
|
detection of foreign bodies; wood plastic and small |
|
|
|
|
manner are iron and copper. |
|
|
|
|
metallic foreign bodies may be missed. A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consultation with the CT technician is helpful in |
Siderosis |
|
|
|
selecting the optimal section so as to reduce the |
|
|
|
|
risk of a false-negative result. Helical CT scans have |
Iron is the most common intraocular foreign body. |
|
|
|
a very high identification rate. Limitations of CT- |
It undergoes dissociation resulting in deposition of iron |
|
|
|
scan are in detecting an inorganic IOFB and ocular |
intraocularly, notably the lens epithelium and the |
|
|
|
soft tissue damage. |
retina. It results in toxic effects on cellular enzyme |
|
• |
MRI generally is not recommended for metallic |
systems resulting in cell death. Signs involve reddish |
|
|
|
|
IOFB's as the strong magnetic fields may move |
brown discolouration of iris, deposits on anterior |
|
|
|
the IOFB causing intraocular damage |
capsule, secondary glaucoma and pigmentary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principles and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
339 |
||
retinopathy. Pigmentary retinopathy has most |
• |
A posterior segment IOFB requires a pars plana |
|
||
profound effect on vision. ERG manifests progressive |
|
vitrectomy,unless the tissue damage is minimal. The |
|
||
attenuation of the b-wave over time. |
|
posterior hyaloid should always be removed, and |
|
||
Chalcosis |
|
any deep impact should be prophylactically treated. |
|
||
|
For the actual removal, the best tool to extract a |
|
|||
Severe ocular reaction occurs due to an intraocular |
|
ferrous IOFB is a strong intraocular magnet. For |
|
||
foreign body with high copper content, leading to an |
|
non-magnetic IOFBs; a proper forceps may be |
|
||
endophthalmitis like presentation followed by phthisis |
|
used. External electromagnets should not be used |
|
||
|
|
||||
bulbi. When the copper content of intraocular foreign |
|
since they do not allow controlled extraction. Rarely, |
|
||
|
a scleral cut-down is used. Corneo-scleral tear |
|
|||
body is low, it results in chalcosis. In these cases |
|
|
|||
|
repair and removal of traumatic cataract are |
|
|||
electrolytically dissociated copper is deposited |
|
|
|||
|
frequently required at the same sitting. As a rule- |
|
|||
intraocularly, forming a Kayser-Fleischer ring and |
|
|
|||
|
all IOFB's should be removed except in certain |
|
|||
anterior sunflower cataract similar to those seen in |
|
|
|||
|
circumstances. |
|
|||
Wilson's disease. |
|
|
|||
• |
A chronic, inert, encapsulated or intralenticular |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
MANAGEMENT |
|
IOFB without clinical / electrophysiological evidence |
|
||
|
of toxixcity in a quiet eye may be left alone, after |
|
|||
Primary Care Guidelines |
|
|
|||
|
proper patient counseling. A periodic follow up with |
|
|||
Since most of FB's come to rest in the posterior segment, |
|
ERG monitoring is necessary. |
|
||
the attending ophthalmologist should refer the case |
• Large IOFB's in a phthisical irreparably damaged |
|
|||
for |
tertiary care, if the expertise and equipment |
|
eye with no perception of light are better left alone. |
|
|
required for comprehensive globe reconstruction is not |
• Once ERG is extinguished in an eye with established |
|
|||
|
metallosis, the ocular damage is almost irreversible |
|
|||
available. Before referral, the primary ophthalmologist |
|
|
|||
|
and IOFB removal is unlikely to improve the |
|
|||
should use systemic medications to control pain and |
|
|
|||
|
outcome. |
|
|||
anxiety. The injured eye should be patched and |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
covered with a shield before referring the patient. A |
Surgical Techniques |
|
|||
tetanus booster may also be appropriate. |
|
||||
|
|
The posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies are |
|
||
Principles of Management |
removed by vitrectomy or via trans-scleral route. |
|
|||
The timing of intervention is primarily determined by |
Magnetic IOFB Extraction: This approach is non- |
|
|||
whether the risk of endophthalmitis is high. If the risk |
invasive but largely uncontrolled. External electro- |
|
|||
is high, immediate (emergency) surgery is indicated; |
magnets like the permanent hand magnet and the |
|
|||
in most other cases, the surgeon has the option of |
newer Broson Magnion instrument can be used to exert |
|
|||
deferring intervention for a few days to reduce the |
powerful magnetic pull after scleral cut down. In case |
|
|||
risk of intraoperative hemorrhage. If endophthalmitis |
of an anterior IOFB, magnet can be applied directly |
|
|||
occurs, it is present at the time of patient presentation |
over the IOFB. For a posterior intravitreal IOFB which |
|
|||
in over 90% of the cases. Broad spectrum systemic |
is away from the retina, magnet can be applied |
|
|||
antibiotics can be started though their effectiveness is |
indirectly through pars plana. The indirect approach |
|
|||
not proven. Intravitreal antibiotics may be useful in |
may damage the retina or crystalline lens by IOFB |
|
|||
high risk cases like IOFB of vegetable matter, rural |
movement. This technique is useful in small (< 3 mm), |
|
|||
injury. |
anterior, visible, intravitreal, magnetic IOFB in a fresh |
|
|||
• |
IOFBs in the anterior chamber are typically |
case. |
|
||
|
removed through a paracentesis (not through the |
Non-magnetic IOFB Extraction: Requires extraction |
|
||
|
original wound) performed at 90-180° from where |
|
|||
|
with intraocular forceps combined with vitrectomy and |
|
|||
|
the IOFB is located. Viscoelastics should be used |
|
|||
|
if required lensectomy. |
|
|||
|
to reduce the risk of iatrogenic damage to the |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
corneal endothelium and the lens. |
Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) |
|
||
• An intralenticular IOFB does not necessarily cause |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
cataract. Unless there is a risk of siderosis or the |
Vitrectomy is indicated for large, posterior, invisible, |
|
||
|
loss to follow-up is high, the IOFB and the lens |
nonmagnetic, intra/subretinal or encapsulated IOFB's |
|
||
|
may be left in situ. Otherwise, usually, the IOFB is |
or those associated with retinal detachment, endoph- |
|
||
|
extracted first, the lens is extracted second, and an |
thalmitis or vitreous hemorrhage. PPV nowadays has |
|
||
|
intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted simultaneously. |
become the standard modality for foreign body |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
management due to greater control and less risk of |
are found to be the predominant cause for fulminant |
|
|
|
||
|
|
iatrogenic injury. Induction of posterior vitreous |
onset, Gram-positive bacillus (28.4%) for acute onset, |
|
|
detachment, wherever possible, is now a standard step |
and fungi (52.3%) for chronic onset of infections. The |
|
|
in PPV to eliminate ERM and PVR. Endolaser |
incidence of post-traumatic endophthalmitis varies |
|
|
photocoagulation is done around site of FB impaction |
from 3.3 to 16.5%. Several predisposing factors |
|
|
to prevent future retinal detachment. Perflurocarbon |
increase the risk of endophthalmitis following ocular |
|
|
liquids (PFCL) can be used to float the IOFB and |
trauma such as delayed primary repair, retained |
|
|
prevent iatrogenic macular damage. PFCL may not |
intraocular foreign body, disruption of lens.These eyes |
|
|||
|
|
be able to support heavy metallic IOFB. The foreign |
require immediate surgical repair. Most of the |
|
|
body is picked up from retina or vitreous after |
infections in post-traumatic endophthalmitis are |
|
|
removing its adhesions, with an intraocular magnet |
polymicrobial with high culture positivity. Bacillus |
|
|
or forceps depending upon its magnetic properties. |
elaborates several enzymes and exotoxins leading to |
|
|
For medium sized IOFB, sclerotomy is enlarged for |
rapid onset fulminant endophthalmitis with systemic |
|
|
removal. For large IOFB's (> 5 mm) limbal incision |
features like fever and leukocytosis. Vitreous biopsy |
|
|
or Open Sky Approach may be required. If corneal |
shows blood stained purulent material. B. cereus is |
|
|
damage is present, corneal button is removed and |
commonly found in cases with retained intraocular |
|
|
temporary keratoprosthesis is used followed by corneal |
foreign body. |
|
|
grafting. Special forceps like Stroinko forceps or ureter |
|
|
|
stone forceps can be used for large non-magnetic IOFB |
CLINICAL FEATURES |
|
|
(e.g. glass). Primary silicone oil tamponade is used in |
Symptoms like pain, photophobia, redness, visual loss |
|
|
patients with severe intraocular foreign body (IOFB) |
|
|
|
are present both due to trauma itself and endophthal- |
|
|
|
injuries and high risk of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. |
|
|
|
mitis also. It is of utmost importance to rule out endo- |
|
|
|
Primary silicone oil stabilizes the retina during the critical |
|
|
|
phthalmitis if pain and visual loss is not proportionate |
|
|
|
period of active PVR and limits the visual loss in the |
|
|
|
to clinical signs. |
|
|
|
long term. Prophylactic 360 degrees encircling scleral |
|
|
|
Clinical signs include lid edema, circumcorneal |
|
|
|
buckle placed at the time of pars plana vitrectomy |
|
|
|
congestion, corneal edema, hypopyon, vitritis, retinal |
|
|
|
reduces the risk of retinal detachment in future. |
|
|
|
periphlebitis or hazy view of fundus. Fungal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGNOSIS |
endophthalmitis though rare, can be present late after |
|
|
initial trauma repair, presenting as persistent or |
|
|
|
Postoperative anatomic and visual outcome after IOFB |
worsening vitritis and snow ball opacities in vitreous |
|
|
removal is limited by proliferative vitreoretinopathy, |
(Figs 53.6 and 53.7). |
|
|
RD and endophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis occurs in |
Management of Post-traumatic Endophthalmitis |
|
|
16-45% of eyes with IOFB depending upon time delay |
|
|
|
in removal of IOFB, type of IOFB (inorganic or organic |
Prophylaxis: Prophylactic systemic antibiotics covering |
|
|
vegetative) or self contaminated injuries.The main risk |
the common causative organisms of traumatic |
|
|
factors for PVR and RD are the size of IOFB, retinal |
endophthalmitis (especially Staphylococcci and Bacillus |
|
|
injury and traumatic cataract. The recent advances in |
cereus) and good intraocular penetration should be |
|
|
surgical techniques have been associated with a |
|
|
|
significant improvement in prognosis. |
|
Post-traumatic Inflammation
TRAUMATIC ENDOPHTHALMITIS
Post-traumatic endophthalmitis is a rare but catastrophic event associated with open globe injuries. Traumatic endophthalmitis, a type of exogenous endophthalmitis, is unique in having a high incidence of Bacillus species especially B.cereus.These eyes have more intense symptoms and signs than eyes with acute postoperative endophthalmitis, perhaps due to more virulent organisms and in addition trauma itself. The diagnosis of traumatic endophthalmitis depends on a high index of suspicion followed by vitreous biopsy and culture techniques. Gram-negative bacilli (65.2%)
Fig. 53.6: Anterior segment photograph of post-traumatic endophthalmitis showing corneal wound (white arrow) and hypopyon
Principles and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
341 |
|
|
12 hourly) are ideal for initial therapy. The same |
|
|
|
combination is preferred for intravitreal injections: |
|
|
|
Vancomycin 1 mg in 0.1 ml and ceftazidime 2.25 mg |
|
|
|
in 0.1 ml. Vancomycin covers the gram positive oraga- |
|
|
|
nisms that usually cause post-traumatic endophthalmitis |
|
|
|
whereas ceftazidime covers gram-negative organisms. |
|
|
|
In case of suspicion of fungal etiology intravitreal |
|
|
|
amphotericin B 0.005 mg in 0.1 ml can be given. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Topical therapy is started with hourly administration |
|
|
|
of fortified antibiotic solutions (cefazolin, gentamicin) |
|
|
|
or fluroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin) eye |
|
|
|
drops. Use of adjunctive steroids in the form of intra- |
|
|
|
vitreal or topical dexamthasone or topical prednisolone |
|
|
|
eye drops is important to decrease the tissue destructive |
|
|
Fig. 53.7: Fundus photograph showing vitreous haze |
effects of the inflammation. |
|
|
Surgical management: Vitrectomy is generally |
|
||
|
|
||
started in all cases of traumatic open globe injuries. |
required in cases of post-traumatic endophthalmitis, |
|
|
due to severity of the infection and the associated |
|
||
Oral Fluroquinolones have good intravitreal |
|
||
trauma. Essentially a core vitrectomy should be |
|
||
penetration and are the drug of choice. Tetanus |
|
||
performed to reduce the microbial load. Peripheral |
|
||
prophylaxis should be considered in all open globe |
|
||
vitreous is better left alone as the retina is very friable |
|
||
injuries especially the contaminated cases. The role of |
|
||
and can lead to iatrogenic tears and detachment. A |
|
||
prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics is controversial due |
|
||
lensectomy may be required in cases of traumatic |
|
||
to their toxicity. Prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics |
|
||
cataract or severe pars plana exudates sticking the back |
|
||
should be given in cases with high risk of infection |
|
||
of the lens leading to poor visualization of vitreous. |
|
||
such as intraocular foreign body, lens disruption, soil |
|
||
Any associated pathologies like IOFB or retinal |
|
||
contamination and injuries in rural setting at the time |
|
||
detachment can be tackled during vitrectomy. |
|
||
of primary repair. |
|
||
Perflurocarbon liquid (PFCL) helps in removal of IOFB |
|
||
Microbiology: In addition to complete clinical |
|
||
and also protects the retina from damage. The retinal |
|
||
examination, a complete microbiologic work up is |
|
||
detachment is repaired with vitrectomy, fluid-air |
|
||
essential for confirmation of endophthalmitis and the |
|
||
exchange and endolaser followed by intravitreal gas |
|
||
causative agents. The various specimens taken are |
|
||
or silicon tamponade and intravitreal antibiotics and |
|
||
vitreous tap or biopsy, AC tap, corneal scraping, |
|
||
steroids. Intravitreal injections are repeated after 48 |
|
||
vitrectomy cassette fluid or removed IOFB. Smears |
|
||
to 72 hours of first injection depending on the response |
|
||
of specimens are sent for staining( Gram, Giemsa and |
|
||
to therapy or half life of the drugs. |
|
||
fungal stains) and inoculated on various agar like |
|
||
Patient should be made aware of the guarded |
|
||
chocolate agar, blood agar for bacteria and |
|
||
nature of visual prognosis and need for repeat |
|
||
Sabauroud's agar for fungi. Microbiologic work up |
|
||
procedures like intravitreal injections or vitrectomy in |
|
||
should include antibiotic susceptibility testing of isolates |
|
||
view of worsening of the condition. Among eyes with |
|
||
which would help in any alteration of antibiotic therapy |
|
||
positive intraocular cultures after open globe injury, |
|
||
in future. |
|
||
the visual prognosis is guarded. Clinical features |
|
||
B-scan Ultrasonography: It is useful in evaluating |
|
||
associated with better visual acuity outcomes include |
|
||
posterior segment status in hazy media. USG will show |
|
||
better presenting visual acuity, culture of a non-virulent |
|
||
moderate density echoes in vitreous cavity suggestive |
|
||
organism, lack of a retinal detachment, absence of |
|
||
of exudation or membranes. We can detect any |
|
||
clinical endophthalmitis, and shorter wound length. |
|
||
associated retinal or choroidal detachment.USG also |
|
||
Prevention of infection by prompt primary repair of |
|
||
detects related conditions such as IOFB and dropped |
|
||
the wound and detection of earliest signs of infection |
|
||
nucleus. |
|
||
is of utmost importance. |
|
||
Medical Management: Mainstay of medical therapy |
|
||
|
|
|
|
are systemic, intravitreal and topical antibiotic drops |
|
|
|
with or without steroids. Steroids help in reducing the |
Sympathetic Ophthalmitis |
|
|
inflammation associated damage to the intraocular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
structures. |
It is a bilateral granulmatous panuveitis occurring |
|
|
Systemic therapy is usually by intravenous route. |
subsequent to penetrating trauma involving uveal tissue |
|
|
Intravenous ceftazidime and vancomycin (both 1 gm |
prolapse or intraocular surgery. The traumatized eye |
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|||
|
is known as the exciting eye and the fellow eye which |
5. |
Al-Omran AM, Abboud EB, Abu El-Asrar AM. |
|||
|
|
|||||
|
|
also develops uveitis is known as the sympathizing eye. |
|
Micro-biologic spectrum and visual outcome of post- |
||
|
|
|
Presentation is usually between two weeks to three |
|
traumatic endophthalmitis. Retina 2007;27(2):236-42. |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Azad RV; Kumar N; Sharma YR; Vohra R. Role of |
||
|
|
months, with 90% of cases occurring within first year of |
||||
|
|
|
prophylactic scleral buckling in the management of |
|||
|
|
injury. Injuries account for 47% of patients while ocular |
|
|||
|
|
|
retained intraocular foreign bodies. Clin Experiment |
|||
|
|
surgery 44% of patients.Patient may also have systemic |
|
|||
|
|
|
Ophthalmol 2004; 32(1): 58-61. |
|||
|
|
manifestations similar to VKH syndrome, like headache, |
7. |
B Shukla, S Natarajan: Management of Ocular Trauma |
||
|
|
tinnitus, dysacousis, aloepecia, vitiligo and poliosis. |
|
2005, PP. 3-12, 89-151, 167-252. |
||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
The exciting eye has signs of initial trauma, besides |
8. |
Barr CC: Prognostic factors in corneoscleral lacerations, |
|
|
|
being irritable. The fellow eye is also inflammed and |
|
Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:919-24. |
||
|
|
9. |
BastekJV, FoosRY, HeckenliveyJ.: Traumatic Pigmentary |
|||
|
|
photophobic, and shows anterior granulmatous uveitis, |
||||
|
|
|
Retinopathy. Am. J Ophth. 1981; 92:621-624. |
|||
|
|
vitritis and multifocal choroidal infiltrates in the mid |
|
|||
|
|
10. |
Beatty S, Smyth KL, Au Eong KG, Lavin MJ. |
|||
|
|
periphery. Histology shows sub RPE infiltrates |
|
Chorioretinitis Sclopeteria. Injury 2000; 31:55-60. |
||
|
|
corresponding to the Dalen Fuchs nodules. Severe |
11. |
Bradford J. Shingelton, Eye Trauma; clinical evaluation. |
||
|
|
cases may show choroidal thickening or exudative |
|
In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, Kenyon KR, editors. Eye |
||
|
|
retinal detachment on ultrasonography. |
|
trauma. St Louis: Mosby, 1991;3-24. |
||
|
|
12. |
Brinton GS, Topping TM et al: Post traumatic |
|||
|
|
|
FFA shows multifocal leaks at the RPE level, with |
|||
|
|
|
|
endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 102:547, 1984. |
||
|
|
subretinal pooling in presence of exudative detach- |
|
|||
|
|
13. |
Brinton GS, Topping TM, Hyndiuk RA, Aaberg TM, |
|||
|
|
ment.Dark spots seen in ICG are suggestive of active |
||||
|
|
|
Reeser FH, Abrahams GW, Post traumatic endophthal- |
|||
|
|
disease. |
|
mitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102(4): 547-50. |
||
|
|
|
Enucleation of the traumatized eye, if severely and |
14. |
Bryden FM, Pyott AA, Bailey M, McGhee CN. Real time |
|
|
|
irreversibly damaged with no visual potential, should |
|
ultrasound in the assessment of intraocular foreign |
||
|
|
be performed within ten days of injury to prevent risk |
15. |
bodies. Eye. 1990; 4 (Pt 5):727-31. |
||
|
|
of sympathetic ophthalmitis. Uveitis may require |
Bustros SD. Posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies. |
|||
|
|
|
In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, Kenyon KR, editors. Eye |
|||
|
|
treatment in the form of topical and systemic steroids |
|
|||
|
|
|
trauma. St Louis: Mosby, 1991.pp.226-237. |
|||
|
|
that should be continued for at least a year with gradual |
|
|||
|
|
16. |
Castiblanco CP, Adelman RA. Sympathetic ophthalmia. |
|||
|
|
tapering to reduce the risk of relapse. Immunosup- |
|
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep 16. |
||
|
|
pressive therapy with high dose systemic steroids such |
17. |
Cekiç O, Batman C, Yasar U, Basci NE, Bozkurt A, Kayaalp |
||
|
|
as intravenous methylprednisolone and steroid-sparing |
|
SO. Human aqueous and vitreous humour levels of |
||
|
|
agents such as cyclosporin A and azathioprine have |
|
ciprofloxacin following oral and topical administration. |
||
|
|
improved the prognosis. |
|
Eye. 1999 Aug;13 ( Pt 4):555-58. |
||
|
|
18. |
Chiquet C, Zech J, Gain P, Adeleine P, Trepsat C. Visual |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
ENUCLEATION |
|
outcome and prognostic factors after magnetic extraction |
||
|
|
|
of posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies in 40 |
|||
|
|
Primary enucleation should be considered for severe |
19. |
cases. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82:801-06. |
||
|
|
irreparable injuries with no visual potential. Secondarily, |
Committee on Trauma and Committee on Shock. |
|||
|
|
|
Accidental death and disability: the neglected disease of |
|||
|
|
enucleation can be attempted if the severely damaged |
|
|||
|
|
|
modern society. Washington: National Academy Press; |
|||
|
|
lost eye is unsightly or uncomfortable. This should be |
|
|||
|
|
|
1966:5. |
|||
|
|
performed within ten days of injury to prevent risk |
|
|||
|
|
20. |
Cruvinel Issac DL, Ghanem VC, Nascimento MA, Toriqoe |
|||
|
|
of sympathetic ophthalmitis. |
|
M, Kara Jose N. Prognostic factors in open globe injuries. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ophthalmologica. 2003; 217 (6); 431-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
21. |
Danis RP Endophthalmitis.Ophthalmol Clin North Am |
|
|
Bibliography |
|
|
2002;15(2): 243-248. |
|
|
|
|
22. |
Das T, Jalali S, Gothwal VK, Sharma S, Naduvilath TJ. |
||
|
1. |
Affeldt JC, Flynn HW Jr, Forster RK, Mandelbaum S, |
|
Intravitreal dexamethasone in exogenous bacterial |
||
|
|
|
Clarkson JG, Jarus GD.Microbial endophthalmitis |
|
endophthalmitis: results of a prospective randomised |
|
|
|
|
resulting from ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1987 |
|
study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Sep;83(9):1050-55. |
|
|
|
|
Apr;94(4):407-13. |
23. |
Dass AB, Ferrone PJ, Chu YR, Esposito M, Gray L. |
|
|
2. |
Aaberg TM. Macular Holes. Survey of Ophth. 1970; |
|
Sensitivity of spiral computed tomography scanning for |
||
|
|
|
15:139-62. |
|
|
detecting intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. |
|
3. |
Aguilar JP, Green WR. Choroidal rupture: A |
|
2001 Dec; 108(12):2326-28. |
||
|
|
|
histopathologic study of 47 cases. Retina. 1998; 4:269- |
24. |
Drews RC: Sodium hyaluronate in repair of perforating |
|
|
|
|
75. |
|
|
eye injuries. Ophthalmic Surg 1986;17:23 |
|
4. |
Alfaro DV, Roth D, Liggett PE. Posttraumatic |
25. |
Duke-Elder S., Mac Faul PA. Injuries, Part I:Mechanical |
||
|
|
|
endophthalmitis. Causative organisms, treatment, and |
|
Injuries. In:Duke-Elder. System of Ophthalmology. |
|
|
|
|
prevention. |
|
London: Henry Klimpton; 1972. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principles and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
343 |
||
26. |
Eagling, E.M.: Ocular damage after blunt trauma to the |
46. |
Lieb Df, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Miller D, Feuer Wj. Open |
|
|
|
eye. Its relationship to the nature of injury. |
|
globe injuries with positive intraocular cultures: Factors |
|
|
|
BJO.1974;58:126-140 |
|
influencing final visual acuity outcomes. Ophthalmology. |
|
|
27. |
Edwards WC, Layden WS: Traumatic hyphema. AmJ |
|
2003 Aug;110(8):1560-65. |
|
|
|
Ophthalmol 1973;75:110 |
47. |
Madreperla SA, Bentz BA. Formation and treatment of |
|
|
28. |
Erakgun T, Egrilmez S. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy |
|
a traumatic macular hole. Arch. Ophthal. 1997; 115: |
|
|
|
for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies. |
|
1210-1211. |
|
|
|
J Trauma. 2008 Apr; 64(4):1034-37. |
48. |
Management of corneoscleral lacerations. In Shingleton |
|
|
29. |
Ersanli D, Unal M, Avdin A, Gulecek O, Kalemoqlu M. |
|
BJ, Hersh PS, Kenyon KR, editors. Eye trauma. St Louis: |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Results of pars plana vitrectomy in closed globe injuries. |
|
Mosby, 1991.pp143-168 |
|
|
|
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005; 36(3):182-88. |
49. |
McNicholas MM, Brophy DP, Power WJ, Griffin JF. Ocular |
|
|
30. |
Fred M. Wilson II: Basic and Clinical Science Course |
|
trauma: evaluation with US.Radiology. 1995 May; |
|
|
|
1990-91, AAO, Section 8, “Glaucoma, Lens and Anterior |
|
195(2):423-27. |
|
|
|
Segment Trauma”, PP.162-165. |
50. |
Mehta DK, Tuli D: New classification systems for ocular |
|
|
31. |
Glaser Bm, Carter JB, Kuppermann BD et al. Perfluoro- |
|
trauma. In: Management of Ocular Trauma Shukla |
|
|
|
octane in treatment of giant retinal tears with proliferative |
|
B,Natrajan S; 1st Ed; Jaypee brothers Medical publisher, |
|
|
|
vitreo-retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1613-21. |
|
New Delhi, 2005. pp 9 |
|
|
32. |
Greven CM, Engelbrecht NE, Slusher MM, Nagy |
51. |
Meier P, Wiedemann P. Endophthalmitis—clinical picture, |
|
|
|
SS.Intraocular foreign bodies: Management, prognostic |
|
therapy and prevention Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. |
|
|
|
factors, and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2000 Mar; |
|
1997 Apr;210(4):175-91. Review. German. Erratum in: |
|
|
|
107:608-12. |
|
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1998 Mar;212(3):162. |
|
|
33. |
Gupta A, Srinivasan R, Gulnar D, Sankar K, Mahalakshmi |
52. |
Mester V, Kuhn F, Intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmol |
|
|
|
T. Risk factors for post-traumatic endophthalmitis in |
|
Clin Am 2002; 15:23542. |
|
|
|
patients with positive intraocular cultures.Eur J |
53. |
Muga R, Maul E: Management of lens damage in |
|
|
|
Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul-Aug;17(4):642-47. |
|
perforating corneal laceration. Br J Ophthalmol |
|
|
34. |
H. Mackenzie Freeman: Ocular Trauma 1979, Chapter |
|
1978;62:784 |
|
|
|
17, “Traumatic Hyphema” Merrill Grayson and Fred M. |
54. |
Narang S, Gupta V, Gupta A, Dogra MR, Pandav SS, |
|
|
|
Wilson II, PP.145-149 |
|
Das S. Role of prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics in open |
|
|
35. |
Hersh PS: Anterior segment reconsruction following |
|
globe injuries. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003 Mar;51(1):39- |
|
|
|
ocular trauma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1988;28:57 |
|
44. |
|
|
36. |
JH Krachmer: The requisites in Ophthalmology - Anterior |
55. |
Narang S, Gupta V, Simalandhi P, et al. Paediatric open |
|
|
|
Segment Trauma. 2000, Christopher J. Rapuono, Jodie |
|
globe injuries. Visual outcome and risk factors for |
|
|
|
I. Luchs, Terry Kim PP.299-303. |
|
endophthalmitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004;52:29-34 |
|
|
37. |
Jonas JB, Knorr HL, Budde WM.Prognostic factors in |
56. |
Negrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. |
|
|
|
ocular injuries caused by intraocular or retrobulbar |
|
Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998;5:14369. |
|
|
|
foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(5):823-28. |
57. |
Ottavio Bernasconi, Carlos Auer, Leonidas Zografos and |
|
|
38. |
Keates RH, Lichtenstein SB: The management of anterior |
|
C. P. Indocyanine green angiographic findings in sympa- |
|
|
|
sement trauma with multiple small incisions. |
|
thetic ophthalmia. Herbort Graefe’s Archive for Clinical |
|
|
|
Ophthalmology 1980;87:887 |
|
and Experimental Ophthalmology, Volume 236, Number |
|
|
39. |
Keren G, Alhalel A, Bartov E, Kitzes-Cohen R, Rubinstein |
|
8 / July, 1998 |
|
|
|
E, Segev S, Treister G.The intravitreal penetration of orally |
58. |
Pavlovic S, Schmidt KG, Tomic Z, Dzinic M. Management |
|
|
|
administered ciprofloxacin in humans. Invest Ophthalmol |
|
of intra-ocular foreign bodies impacting or embedded in |
|
|
|
Vis Sci. 1991 Jul;32(8):2388-92. |
|
the retina. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1998 Aug; |
|
|
40. |
Konstantinidis L, Borruat FX, Wolfensberger TJ. Long- |
|
26(3):24142. |
|
|
|
term stability of retinal function despite retained |
59. |
Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P et al. A system for classifying |
|
|
|
intraocular metallic foreign body. Klin Monatsbl |
|
Mechanical injuries of the eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; |
|
|
|
Augenheilkd. 2008 May;225(5):482-5. Links |
|
123: 820-831. |
|
|
41. |
Kuhn F, Morris R et al. A standardized classification of |
60. |
Postel EA, Mieler WF. Management of posterior segment |
|
|
|
ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103: 240-243. |
|
intraocular foreign bodies. In: Guyer Dr, Yanuzzi LA, |
|
|
42. |
Kuhn F, Morris R: Posterior segment IOFB-management |
|
Chang S, Shields JA, Green WR, editors. Retina-Vitreous- |
|
|
|
in the vitrectomy era. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:821- |
|
Macula, vol2.Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; |
|
|
|
22. |
|
1999.pp 1395-1406. |
|
|
43. |
Kunimoto DY, DasT, Sharma S, et al. Microbiologic spec- |
61. |
Potts AM, Distler JA. Shape factor in the penetration of |
|
|
|
trum and susceptibility of isolates: Part II. Postoperative |
|
intraocular foreign bodies. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Jul |
|
|
|
endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:242-44. |
|
15;100(1):183-87. |
|
|
44. |
Lakits A, Prokesch R, Scholda C, Bankier A. Orbital |
62. |
Rahman I, Maino A, Devadason D, Leatherbarrow B. |
|
|
|
helical computed tomography in the diagnosis and |
|
Open globe injuries : factors predictive of poor outcome. |
|
|
|
management of eye trauma. Ophthalmology. 1999 Dec; |
|
Eye. 2006;20(12): 1335. |
|
|
|
106(12):2330-35. |
63. |
Ramakrishnan R, Bharathi MJ, Shivkumar C, Mittal S, |
|
|
45. |
Levin MR, D’Amico DT: Traumatic endophthalmopathy. |
|
Meenakshi R, Khadeer MA, Avasthi A. Microbiological |
|
|
|
In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, Kenyon KR, editors. Eye |
|
profile of culture-proven cases of exogenous and |
|
|
|
trauma. St Louis: Mosby, 1991.pp.242-52. |
|
endogenous endophthalmitis: a 10-year retrospective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
||
|
|
study. Eye. 2008 Jul 4.Centre for Excellence in |
|
with retained intraocular foreign bodies. National Eye |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Glaucoma, Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate |
|
Trauma System. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct; 100(10): |
|
|
|
Institute of Ophthalmology, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, |
|
146874. |
|
|
|
South India. |
80. |
Tran TP, Le TM, Bui HT, Nguyen TM, Küchle M, Nguyen |
|
64. |
Rao NA, Tso MO, Rosenthal AR.Chalcosis in the human |
|
NX. Post-traumatic endophthalmitis after penetrating |
|
|
|
|
eye. A clinicopathologic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976 |
|
injury in Vietnam: risk factors, microbiological aspect and |
|
|
|
Aug; 94(8):1379-84. |
|
visual outcome Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003 |
|
65. |
Refojo MF, Dohlman CH et al: Evaluation of adhesive |
|
Jul;220(7):481-5. German. |
|
|
|
|
for corneal surgeries. Arch Ophthalmol 1968;80: 645 |
81. |
Vote BJ, Hall A, Cairns J, Buttery R. Changing trends in |
|
|
|
|||
|
66. |
Rosenthal AR, Marmor MF, Leuenberger P, Hopkins |
|
Sympathetic ophthalmia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. |
|
|
|
|
JL.Chalcosis: a study of natural history.Ophthalmology. |
|
2004 Oct;32(5):542-45. |
|
|
|
1979 Nov; 86(11):1956-72. |
82. |
W.A.J. van Hueven, Johan T. Zwaan: Decision Making |
|
67. |
Rowsey JJ, Hays JC: Refractive reconstruction for acute |
|
in Ophthalmology” PP. 48-49; “Eye trauma” Mark |
|
|
|
|
eye injuries. Ophthalmic Surg 1984;15:569 |
|
Haywood, Lina Marouf. PP. 58-59. |
|
68. |
Ryan SJ, Allen LW: Pars plana vitrectomy in ocular |
83. |
Wani VB, Al-Ajmi M, Thalib L, Azad RV, Abul M, Al- |
|
|
|
|
trauma. Am J Ophthalmol 1979;88:483 |
|
Ghanim M, Sabti K. Vitrectomy for posterior segment |
|
69. |
Secrets in Ophthalmology 1999, Chapter 21, “Traumatic |
|
intraocular foreign bodies: visual results and prognostic |
|
|
|
|
Hyphema and Glaucoma”, Annette k. Terebuh & Martha |
|
factors. Retina. 2003 Oct; 23(5):654-60. |
|
|
|
Motuz Leen, PP.151-161. |
84. |
Weiss MJ, Hofeldt AJ, Behrens M, Fisher K.Ocular |
|
70. |
Shiedow TG, Gonder JR. Macular Hole secondary to |
|
siderosis. Diagnosis and management. Retina. |
|
|
|
|
retrobulbar needle perforation. Retina 1998; 178-180 |
|
1997;17(2):105-8. |
|
71. |
Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS: “Traumatic Hyphema”: Eye |
85. |
Wickham L, Xing W, Bunce C, Sullivan P. Outcomes of |
|
|
|
|
Trauma 1991, Pages 104-116. |
|
surgery for posterior segment intraocular foreign |
|
72. |
Shukla B, Management of Ocular Trauma, chapter 11; |
|
bodies—a retrospective review of 17 years of clinical |
|
|
|
|
page no. 93-102. |
|
experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 |
|
73. |
Shukla B; Epidemiology of Ocular Trauma, 1st Ed; |
|
Dec; 244(12):1620-26. |
|
|
|
|
Jaypee brothers Medical publisher, New Delhi, 2002. |
86. |
Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H. Results |
|
74. |
Smiddy WE, Stark WJ: Anterior segment intraocular |
|
and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with |
|
|
|
|
foreign body. In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, Kenyon KR, |
|
retained intraocular foreign bodies.Ophthalmology |
|
|
|
editors. Eye trauma. St Louis: Mosby, 1991.pp.169-174 |
|
1988;95:911-16. |
|
75. |
Smith D, Wrenn K, Stack LB. The epidemiology and |
87. |
Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW. Intraocular foreign |
|
|
|
|
diagnosis of penetrating eye injuries. Acad Emerg Med |
|
bodies in young people. Retina 1990: 10: S45-9. |
|
|
|
2002; 9: 209-213. |
88. |
Wirostko WJ, Mieler WF, McCabe CM, Diekert JP. |
|
76. |
Steinert RF: Iris trauma. In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PS, |
|
Intraocular foreign bodies In: Albert DM, Jakobiee FA, |
|
|
|
|
Kenyon KR, editors. Eye trauma. St Louis: Mosby, |
|
editors. Principles and practice of Ophthalmology, vol 6, |
|
|
|
1991.pp.95-103 |
|
2nd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; |
|
77. |
Szurman P, Roters S, Grisanti S, Aisenbrey S, Rohrbach |
|
2000.pp 5241-50. |
|
|
|
|
JM, Warga M, Gelisken F, Spitzer MS, Bartz-Schmidt KU. |
89. |
Wirostko WJ, Mieler WF, McCabe CM. Removal of |
|
|
|
Primary silicone oil tamponade in the management of |
|
intraocular foreign bodies. In Peyman GA, Meffert SA, |
|
|
|
severe intraocular foreign body injuries: an 8-year follow- |
|
Conway MD, editors. Vitreoretinal surgical techniques. |
|
|
|
up. Retina. 2007 Mar;27(3):304-11. |
|
London: Martin Dunitz Ltd, 2001. pp. 443-56. |
|
78. |
Thach AB, Lopez PF, Snady-McCoy LC, Golub BM, |
90. |
Wolter JR: Coup-contrecoup mechanism of ocular |
|
|
|
|
Framach DA. Accidental Nd:YAG LASER injuries to the |
|
injuries. AJO.1963;56:785-796. |
|
|
|
macula. AJO 1995; 119:767-773 |
91. |
Woodcock MG, Scott RA, Huntbach J, Kirkby GR. Mass |
|
79. |
Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, Mieler WF, Liggett |
|
and shape as factors in intraocular foreign body injuries. |
|
|
|
|
PE. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries |
|
Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec; 113(12):2262-69. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C H A P T E R
54Eyelid Injuries and Reconstruction:
An Update
Quresh Maskati, Sunil Vasani (India)
Introduction
Most eyelid defects, full thickness or otherwise, come from cancers such as basal cell carcinoma or otherwise. In traumatic defects, the defect may be partial or full thickness and a simple inspection of the trauma site often reveals that slowly piecing the remnants together like a jigsaw puzzle will correct the defect. Most ophthalmic or oculoplastic surgeons must know the consistency and limitation of periorbital tissues to begin eyelid reconstruction. The same knowledge can also be applied for cosmetic surgery.
Eyelid Injuries
A careful history to evaluate the circumstances under which the injury was caused is mandatory. Some injuries are simple with only superficial lacerations of the lid while other facial trauma may involve injuries to the head and neck regions along with severe lid injury. The latter should be dealt with immediately as they maybelifethreatening.Henceitisimperativetoestablish that the injury is localized only to the eyelid and surrounding adnexa before beginning management.
CLASSIFICATION
The authors prefer to classify eyelid injuries into:
1.Simple lacerations
2.Complex injuries
3.Full thickness margin defects (a) with tissue loss (b) without tissue loss
4.Damage to levator aponeurosis
5.Associated with eye/orbital injuries
6.Canalicular lacerations.
ANATOMY REVIEW
The upper eyelid can be broadly broken up into:
a.Anterior lamella
b.Posterior lamella.
The anterior lamella is broadly made up by skin (thinnest in the body) and orbicularis oculi muscle. The posterior lamella is broadly made up by the tarsal plate, conjunctiva, Muller’s muscle and the levator aponeurosis in its posterior part.
An important surface anatomy landmark is the eyelid crease in the upper eyelid, which is formed by the attachment of a few fibres of the levator aponeurosis to the skin. A recession of the eyelid crease with ptosis and a good levator function may signify levator dehiscence.
Also important are the medial and central pads of fat that lie on and are important landmarks in finding the levator aponeurosis. The palpebral portion of the lacrimal gland replaces the lateral fat pad in the upper eyelid.
EXAMINATION
All examination should begin with a thorough search for any damage to the globe. In a conscious patient, visual acuity, intra-ocular pressure check, slit lamp bio microscopy and fundus examinations are mandatory. It is important to include assessment of ocular motility in the initial exam. Remember, even seemingly trivial eyelid injuries may be associated with underlying globe injuries. In patients with altered sensorium, a complete eye examination should be still carried out.
Assessment of Adnexal Injuries
In conscious patients complete and thorough evaluation of the eyelids and lacrimal system should be carried out. The levator muscle can be assessed by the eyelid crease, the margin reflex distance (MRD) and the levator function test. Medial lacerations may cause canalicular tears or canthal tendon disinsertion. The punctum may be displaced laterally.
346 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
Evaluation of the Orbit |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Sometimes severe injuries may cause significant eyelid |
|
|
|
|
edema, which may hamper proper eye examination. |
|
|
|
|
Manipulation of the eyelids in these cases may |
|
|
|
|
exacerbate pre-existing globe damage. Such patients |
|
|
|
|
should be examined under anesthesia. Orbital injuries |
|
|
|
|
can be evaluated with CT scan with axial and coronal |
|
|
|
|
cuts to rule out associated orbital fractures and foreign |
|
|
|
|
bodies. CT scan may also help in assessing optic nerve |
|
|
|
|
compression or damage. A further MRI examination, |
|
|
|
|
after ruling out metallic foreign bodies in the orbit can |
|
|
|
|
be carried out if necessary for further optic nerve / |
Figs 54.1A and B: (A) Incorrect closure with lid notch, |
|
|
|
muscle/adnexal studies. |
||
|
|
|
If facial/nasal or head neck regions are affected, |
(B) Correct closure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
additional help from the concerned specialists should |
|
|
|
|
be sought. |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
The aim of all management is to restore function, vision |
|
|
|
|
and cosmesis to as close to normal as possible. If the |
|
|
|
|
patient is intoxicated or unconscious and immediate |
|
|
|
|
surgery cannot be performed, tissues should be washed |
|
|
|
|
and repositioned as close to normal as possible. A light |
|
|
|
|
dressingwithtopicalantibioticscanbegiven.Intravenous |
|
|
|
|
steroids and antibiotics or oral antibiotics should be |
Figs 54.2A and B: (A) Devitalized apex, |
|
|
|
administered. Intra-muscular tetanus toxoid injection |
||
|
|
(B) Y-shaped flap |
||
|
|
should also be administered. The surgeon can safely |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
wait 24-48 hours before attempting surgical |
• To avoid lid notching, try to close wounds |
|
|
|
intervention. |
||
|
|
Anesthesia |
horizontally i.e. parallel to lid margin in the upper |
|
|
|
eyelid and vertically in the lower lid, i.e. |
||
|
|
Minor lacerations can be repaired in the outpatient |
perpendicular to lid margin (Figs 54.1A and B). |
|
|
|
department itself under local anesthesia. 2% lidocaine |
• Simple eyelid laceration can be closed directly with |
|
|
|
with epinephrine 1:100,000 can be infiltrated locally |
slight margin eversion. Care should be taken to |
|
|
|
before closure. General anesthesia should be adminis- |
avoid tension on wound edges. The authors prefer |
|
|
|
tered for complex or deeper injuries. However, sedation |
to close vertical lacerations in layers with 6/0 |
|
|
|
with monitored care along with local infiltration with |
||
|
|
polyglactin and skin with 6/0 polypropylene. |
||
|
|
or without a regional nerve block will suffice in most |
||
|
|
Horizontal lacerations spontaneously reapproxi- |
||
|
|
cases. |
||
|
|
mate themselves due to orbicularis sphincter |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surgical Tips |
action. |
|
|
|
Disfigurement of the anterior lamella can cause |
||
|
|
• |
Examine globe thoroughly for perforations and |
|
|
|
complex lacerations. We try to undermine the edges |
||
|
|
|
injuries – if necessary, explore. |
|
|
|
|
to mobilize the tissue to aid anatomically perfect |
|
|
|
• Wash all wounds with saline and a solution of 1gm |
||
|
|
apposition. Debridement should be minimal. After |
||
|
|
|
cefazolin in 250 ml saline. |
|
|
|
|
debridement, a “V” shaped laceration can be converted |
|
|
|
• |
Prepping can be done with diluted solution of |
|
|
|
to a “Y” shaped configuration after removal of the |
||
|
|
|
povidone-iodine. |
|
|
|
|
devitalized apex (Figs 54.2A and B). |
|
|
|
• |
Remove all foreign bodies after thorough |
|
|
|
|
exploration of all affected tissues. |
LID MARGIN REPAIR |
|
|
• |
Check anterior and posterior lamella |
|
|
|
• |
Look for lid laxity, indicative of canthal tendon |
Proper and immaculate closure of lid margin injuries |
|
|
|
injury |
should be sought for rewarding results. Failure to do |
|
|
• Examine upper and lower canaliculi, lacrimal gland |
so will cause lid disfigurement and notching and may |
|
|
|
|
and levator muscle. |
lead to corneal drying and complications. |
|
|
|
|
|
