Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma
.pdf
Bottle Cork Injury to the Eye |
297 |
|
|
|
|
Fig. 48.1: Compression > decompression > passing beyond primary position
intraocular structures that can result in various different lesions (Fig. 48.1).
From an analysis of different kinds of bottle corks, the plastic ones were found to ensure good tightness on account of their inherent tension, so that when the bottle is opened a kind of explosive discharge of energy is released. On the contrary, the natural cork expands inside the bottle because of the inner damp ambient and its discharge is consequently less violent.
A particular type of sparkling wine is manufactured in the province of Modena, which ferments, generating pressure inside the bottle that can cause the ejection of the cork similar to that of a bottle of champagne.
In Modena University we collected a series of 34 consecutive cases of bottle–cork eye injury admitted to the Ophthalmology Institute of Modena in the last 8 years that needed hospitalization. We assessed the anatomic and functional consequences of the injury in a retrospective study.10
Of the cases of eye injury admitted to our department in this 8-years period, 11% were bottle cork injuries, 13% were occupational accidents, 5% were road accidents, 13% were sport injuries, 23% were domestic accidents, and other types accounted for 35%.
In all cases the bottle cork or cap hit the eye of the person opening the bottle, did not involve bystanders in any case. Sparkling wine was involved in all cases: white in 71%, and red in 29%; 38% of the bottles were homemade wine and 62% were commercial. The types of cork were as follows: 38% stoppers without wire, 32% corks and 30% metal crown caps.
About seasonal distribution, there’s a greater incidence in January, on account of the holiday period, and in October, due to wine fermentation which influences the internal pressure of the bottle (Fig. 48.2). All cases are closed–globe injury according to Kuhn’s classification.11,12
Fig. 48.2: Month-by-month distribution of bottle cork eye injuries
Clinical Features
The clinical features more frequently observed are:
•Hyphema (79%) (Figs 48.3 and 48.4)
•Corneal edema (59%)
•Periferic retinal edema (24%)
•Subluxation of the crystalline lens (21%)
(Fig. 48.5)
•Retinal hemorrhage (18%)
•Iridodialysis (15%) (Fig. 48.6)
•Retinal tear (9%)
•Posterior pole retinal edema with macular involvement causing a poor vision acuity (6%)
•Retinal detachment (6%)
•Complete displacement of the IOL (3%)
•Traumatic cataract (3%)
298 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 48.3: Hyphema
Fig. 48.4: Hyphema
Fig. 48.5: Lens subluxation
Sequelas are:
•Pupil motility anomalies (21%)
•Traumatic cataract (21%)
•Post-traumatic ocular hypertension (6%)
•Maculopathy (3%)
•Optic neuropathy (3%)
Fig. 48.6: Iridodialysis
Treatment
In most of the cases the treatment consists of general medical practice and use of local anti-hemorragic and anti-inflammatory medication.
In some cases it can be necessary to treat the ocular hypertension with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors administered generally and with beta-blockers administered locally.
Surgical treatment is necessary in the most severe cases:
If a lens luxation occurs it is necessary to perform a complete Via Pars Plana Vitrectomy, preferably with Posterior Hyaloid removal, and make a secondary IOL scleral fixation. Recently, the approach can be done with transconjunctival mini-invasive (25, 23G) strategies. In these cases a Iris fixation secondary implantation could be the gold standard, avoiding in this way to open the conjunctiva.
In case of traumatic cataract, a phacoemulsification could be difficult depending on the grade of subluxation. If vitreous is in anterior chamber, a vitrectomy is necessary, via limbus or via pars plana, using preferably a mini-invasive (25, 23G) approach.
In presence of retinal detachment, after an accurate examination we can choose for an episcleral approach or for internal approach with vitrectomy: in the last situation the choice of the tamponade agent depends on the retinal situation and the preferences of the surgeon.
The iris injuries need adequate iris plastic surgery, even if many cases of iridodialysis, usually well limited, don’t need surgical treatment.
Prevention
In most of the cases visual acuity on admission was generally very low, and although most patients made an almost complete recovery, very severe visual impairment was observed in others.
Bottle Cork Injury to the Eye |
|
299 |
||
These cases prove that bottle cork eye injury can |
5. |
Koval R, Teller J, Belkin M, Romem M, Yanko L, Savir |
|
|
involve very severe traumas, although most patients re- |
|
H. The Isaraeli ocular injuries study. A nationwide |
|
|
cover almost totally with appropriate medical treatment. |
|
collaborative study. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:776-80. |
|
|
More information and prevention is needed, |
6. |
Archer D, Galloway NR. Champagne-cork injury to the |
|
|
particularly in certain periods of the year and in specific |
|
eye. Lancet 1967;2:487-9. |
|
|
areas of the country. It is advisable to fit bottles with |
7. |
Delori F, Pomerantzeff O, Cox MS. Deformation of the |
|
|
safety devices and/or include captions describing the |
|
globe under high-speed impact: its relation to contusion |
|
|
hazard posed by bottle caps/corks.4 Moreover, the |
|
injuries. Invest Ophthalmol 1969;8:290-301. |
|
|
introduction of a standardized type of screwable cork |
8. |
Greven CM. Retinal Breaks. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS (eds) |
|
|
could be effective in preventing ejection. Alternatively |
|
Opthalmology. Mosby, Philadelphia, section 8, |
|
|
the use of a contention system, connecting the cork |
|
1999;38.2. |
|
|
9. |
Rubsamen PE. Posterior Segment Ocular Trauma. In: |
|
||
to the bottle neck with a wire, could represent another |
|
|||
|
Yanoff M, Duker JS (eds) Opthalmology. Mosby, |
|
||
preventive possibility. |
|
|
||
|
Philadelphia, section 8, 1999;43.2-3. |
|
||
|
|
|
||
References |
10. |
Cavallini GM, Lugli N, Campi L, Pagliani L, Saccarola P. |
|
|
|
Bottle –cork injury to the eye: a review of 13 cases. Eur |
|
||
1. Al Salem M, Sheriff SMM. Ocular injuries from carbonated |
|
J Ophthalmol 2003;13(3):287-91. |
|
|
soft drink bottle explosions. Br J Ophthalmol 1984; |
11. |
Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers |
|
|
68:281-3. |
|
JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular |
|
|
2. Gupta AK, Nadiger M, Moraes O. Ocular injury from a |
|
trauma. Ophthalmology 1996;103(2):240-3. |
|
|
carbonated beverage bottle. J Pediatr Ophthalmol |
|
|
||
12. |
Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM Sr, Bridges WZ |
|
||
Strabismus 1980;17:394-5. |
|
|||
|
Jr, Capone A Jr, Cardillo JA, de Juan E Jr, Kuhn F, |
|
||
3. Sellar PW, Johnston PB. Ocular injuries due to exploding |
|
|
||
|
Meredith TA, Mieler WF, Olsen TW, Rubsamen P, Stout |
|
||
bottles of carbonated drinks. BMJ 1991;303:176-7. |
|
|
||
4. Kuhn F, Mester V, Morris R, Dalma J. Serious eye injuries |
|
T. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye |
|
|
caused by bottles containing carbonated drinks. Br J |
|
(globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. Am J |
|
|
Ophthalmol 2004;88:69-71. |
|
Ophthalmol 1997;123(6):820-31. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C H A P T E R
49Ocular War Injuries
Jaroslaw Kulinski, Karol Stasiak, Marek Prost (Poland)
Introduction
In our times of global terrorism the occurrence of injuries caused by the explosives is not limited only to the battlefields but also to the countries which do not wage war. Very often civilians in seemingly peaceful cities are more frequently victims of such a trauma than military personnel on the modern battlefield. So speaking about “war injuries” that this description should be nowadays applied not only the soldiers but also to the civilians.
Eyes occupy only 0.29% of the body surface and 4% of the face surface. However, ocular injuries are extremely important health problem, because of their predominating role in perception. Despite the fact that eyeballs are relatively small organ, their direct injuries are usually extensive and severe. It is due to the short distance and proximity of the explosives. They are mainly caused by the explosive wave and objects of different size colliding with the human body with very high speed and kinetic energy. Even with small diameter such factors may produce severe ocular damages. They results not only in extensive injuries but also in severe functional outcomes (Fig. 49.1). It is estimated that ocular injuries are bilateral in 15 to 25% of cases.
Fig. 49.1: Eye-bulb atrophy in a soldier after blunt ocular trauma during Iraqi operation
Percentage of soldiers who experienced ocular injuries is increasing with the consecutive wars and military conflicts. Inaccurate data indicate that this percentage accounted for about 1.5 to 2% during the I World War, about 2 to 3.3% during the II World War, 3 to 8% during the Korean War, 5 to 9% of casualties in Vietnam, about 10% in Arab-Israeli War and 13% of Iraqis operations. (Ari 2006, Homblass 1981, Heier et al, 1993, La Plana et al 1997, Mader et al 1993). Various authors state that ocular injuries connected with military operations (wars, terrorist actions, landmine clearing) accounts for 16% of all injuries. It is due to an increase in head trauma by about 40% in 1982-2005, compared to an increase of all injuries and wounds by 12% (Rustemeyer et al 2007).
One should bear in mind that the first specialist ophthalmologic aid may be delayed during the war. Despite usually efficient medical evacuation medical help is not always possible immediately after trauma. Moreover, war injuries frequently involve several organs, additionally delaying ophthalmologic examination and treatment.
Field hospital should be equipped with basic ophthalmologic devices, enabling examination of the globe anterior segment and eye fundus in the slit lamp. Physician-ophthalmologist, ophthalmologic technician or optometrist should carry out examination of the eyes. Very important is access to the split lamp in examination room of the field hospital. This lamp enables preliminary evaluation of the degree and severity of trauma and decision on the further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Some field hospitals are also equipped in teleconsultaion system. Help of specialists from other health care centers is possible in some difficult cases.
Demographic characteristics of patients reporting to the field hospital with eye diseases depend on the type of military operations in the said region. Bancroft and Lattimore saw only 48 (3%) patients with ocular injuries out of 1471 patients who reported to the
Ocular War Injuries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
ophthalmologic service in the transportation base |
Mechanical Ocular War Injuries |
|
||||||
support hospital during 9 months in 1995 (Bancroft |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
et al 2001). Remaining 168 (11%) patients presented |
GLOBEAND ADNEXAL INJURIES |
|
|
|
||||
with ocular diseases, requiring an intensive treatment. |
Global and adnexal injuries may be classified in several |
|
||||||
Nine patients required evacuation from the military |
|
|||||||
ways. First of all, they may be classified by causative |
|
|||||||
operation region but not necessary surgical treatment |
|
|||||||
factor as: incised, punctured, crushed, lacerated, and |
|
|||||||
in other specialist centers. However, this hospital was |
|
|||||||
contused injuries. Ocular injuries may also be classified |
|
|||||||
located some hours of drive from the front line. |
|
|||||||
by anatomical structures involved. To unify the classi- |
|
|||||||
Statistics cited by the authors working in vicinity |
|
|||||||
fication of mechanical ocular injuries the International |
|
|||||||
of the military operations are far worse. Thach et al |
|
|||||||
Trauma Classification was approved in 1996 (Table |
|
|||||||
noted 797 severe ocular injuries, including as many |
|
|||||||
49.1) (Fryczkowki et al 2003), Kuhn et al 1996, |
|
|||||||
as 438 open globe injuries, in the war in Iraq during |
|
|||||||
Pieramici et al 1997). |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
34 months (from March 2003 to December 2005) |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thach et al 2008). Enucleation was performed in 116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 49.1: International ocular trauma classification |
|
|
||||||
cases, including 6 patients with bilateral enucleation. |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open |
Closed |
|
|
|
|||
Heier reported 108 (14%) patients with ocular injuries |
|
|
|
|
||||
out of 767 wounded, including 20 patients had to be |
Type |
A Rupture |
A Contusion |
|
|
|||
evacuated for further specialist treatment, during |
|
B |
Penetrating |
B Laceration |
|
|
||
Operation Desert Storm (1990-1991) (Heier et al |
|
C IOFB |
C Superficial FB |
|
|
|||
1993). Retrospective study carried out by Muzaffar |
|
D Perforating |
D Mixed |
|
|
|
||
|
E |
Mixed |
|
- |
- |
|
|
|
et al. a total of 91 eyes of 51 men, clearing landmines |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Degree |
1 |
>20/40 |
1 >20/40 |
|
|
|||
in the aftermath of the Russo-Afghan war, were |
|
|
||||||
operated within 39 months (from November 1992 |
by visual |
2 |
20/50–20/100 |
2 20/50–20/100 |
|
|
||
acuity |
3 |
19/100–20/800 |
3 19/100–20/800 |
|
|
|||
to January 1996) (Muzaffar et el 2000). Total blindness |
|
|
||||||
|
4 |
19/800–LP |
4 19/800–LP |
|
|
|||
(NPL) was seen in 37.5% of the eyes, and visual acuity |
|
|
|
|||||
|
5 NLP |
5 NLP |
|
|
|
|||
was below cfbe. in further 20.8%. Only 16.4% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone |
I |
Cornea to |
I |
External |
|
|
||
injuries were classified as mild with VA over 0.3. Eyelids |
|
|
||||||
|
|
corneoscleral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
plasty (50% of eyes), evisceration (23.1%), and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
limbus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vitrectomy (17.6%) predominated in the treatment. |
|
II |
Within 5 mm of |
II |
Anterior segment |
|
|
|
It should be mentioned that all these patients |
|
|
the limbus |
|
|
|
|
|
worked without any eye protection. Bajaire et al |
|
III Sclera more than |
III Posterior segment |
|
|
|||
published data on performed vitreo-retinal surgeries |
|
|
5 mm from limbus |
|
|
|
|
|
during a 8-year follow-up period (from January 1995 |
Marcus |
Positive |
Positive |
|
|
|
||
to June 2003) (Bajaire et el 2006). As much as 40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gunn |
Negative |
Negative |
|
|
||||
of injuries involved zone I to the corneal limbus, 44% |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– zone II from the corneal limbus to 5 mm behind |
Below ocular injuries that may result from the |
|
||||||
it, 16% of injuries were localized in zone III in the |
|
|||||||
military operations are briefly discussed. However, the |
|
|||||||
posterior globe pole. Visual acuity in 98% eyes was |
|
|||||||
authors focus on the specific ocular war injuries. Sequels |
|
|||||||
below 1/40. During vitrectomy, silicone oil was used |
|
|||||||
of the globe injuries by anatomical structures presents |
|
|||||||
in 65% of cases, perfluorocarbons in 21%, lensectomy |
|
|||||||
Table 49.2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
in 82%, IOFB was removed in 72% of cases, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Management varies in dependence on the type of |
|
|||||||
endolaser was used in 81% of cases. Improvement |
|
|||||||
injury. As it is seen in the table, the treatment is |
|
|||||||
was seen in 43%, stabilization in 41%, and sight |
|
|||||||
frequently surgical. Therefore, knowledge, experience, |
|
|||||||
worsening in 15% of cases. Factors of poor prognosis |
|
|||||||
proper equipment in the wards and OR are required. |
|
|||||||
included: lesions in zone III, retinal detachment, |
|
|||||||
Applied procedures do not differ from these used in |
|
|||||||
intraocular inflammation, and perforating trauma. |
|
|||||||
any ophthalmologic center. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
From the above listed data, it results that ocular |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
injuries constitute serious problem, not only medical |
Open Globe Injuries |
|
|
|
|
|
||
but also social and economic. Americans estimated that |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Open globe injuries are one of the most severe ocular |
|
|||||||
the cost of one soldier exclusion from the service due |
|
|||||||
to ocular injury for 5.9 days on average amounted |
injuries. They are most frequently produced by |
|
||||||
to $6295 (Buckingham et al 2001). Ocular injuries |
landmine blasts or hand grenades. It is estimated that |
|
||||||
may be classified as multiorgan, when the eye is only |
such injuries constitute 50 to 80% of trauma in the |
|
||||||
one of many damaged organs, and uniorgan, involving |
contemporary battlefields with penetrating and |
|
||||||
the eye and adnexa only. |
perforating wounds with IOFB predominance, often |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 49.2: Globe injuries by anatomical structures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anatomical structure |
Type of injury |
Sequel |
Treatment |
|
Prognosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eyelids |
Abrasion, closed or open |
Upper lid ptosis, lacrimal tract |
S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
global injury |
disruption, hemorrhage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacrimal apparatus |
Dislocation |
Edema |
S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lacrimal ducts |
Disruption |
Lacrimation, inflammation |
S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conjunctiva |
Abrasion, rupture |
Hemorrhage, defects |
S |
|
Good |
|
|
Cornea |
Epithelial abrasion |
Recurrent defects |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Rupture of the |
Scars, keratoconus, |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
posterior limiting |
corneal edema, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
membrane of the cornea |
anterior adhesions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sclera |
Rupture |
Uveal prolapse, vitreous prolapse, |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
|
retinal impaction, hypotonia, loss of vision, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
inflammation, retinal detachment, glaucoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abrasion |
Hemorrhage |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anterior chamber |
Rupture of the iris sphincter |
Photophobia |
C/S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Iridodialysis |
Inflammation |
C/S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Iridoschisis |
Edema |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Angle recession |
Inflammation |
C |
|
|
|
|
|
Hyphema |
Corneal incrustation, |
C/S |
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
|
secondary glaucoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pupillary muscles paralysis |
Photophobia |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Traumatic iritis |
Adhesions, secondary glaucoma |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Refraction disorders |
Hypermetropia, myopia |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Vitreous hernia |
Vitreous base avulsion, retinal |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
detachment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lens |
Opacities (Vossius’ |
Cataract |
C, |
|
Good |
|
|
|
rings, subcapsular, |
|
sometimes |
|
|
|
|
|
disseminated, diffused) |
|
awaiting |
|
|
|
|
|
Luxation |
Deterioration of sight |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Subluxation |
Refraction disorders |
C/S |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Rupture of the |
Opacity – cataract |
S |
|
Good |
|
|
|
lenticular capsule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitreous |
Hemorrhage |
Opacities, sparkling floaters, |
C/S |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
|
photoreceptors damage, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posterior vitreous |
retinal pigmentation |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
detachment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retina |
Tear, detachment |
Complete retinal detachment |
S |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
from the limbus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retinal detachment |
Worsening, loss of vision |
S |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Commotio retinae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Berlin’s edema, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terson syndrome, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purtscher’s angiopathic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retinopathy, peripheral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
retinal edema) |
Vision deterioration |
C |
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
Hemorrhage |
Vision deterioration, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proliferations, retinal detachment |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Macular hole |
Vision deterioration |
Laser |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
therapy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Choroid |
Rupture |
Retinal detachment |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Detachment of the |
Intraocular pressure drop – papilledema, |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
ciliary body |
retinal edema, choroidal detachment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-traumatic inflammation |
Scotoma |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
Lesions to the ciliary |
Accommodation disorders, lens dislocation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
muscles or nerves |
ciliary muscle spasm |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orbit |
Hemorrhage |
Optic nerve and orbital structures compression |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
Soft tissues edema |
Optic nerve and orbital structures compression |
S/C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
Fracture of the orbital walls |
Orbital structures and eyeball damage |
S |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optic nerve |
Rupture of the optic |
Partial damage |
C |
|
Good |
|
|
|
nerve II vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detachment |
Vision loss |
C |
|
Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend: S – surgical treatment ; C– conservative treatment. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocular War Injuries |
|
303 |
|
multiple (about 80%). Foreign bodies, both metallic |
vitreous opacities, macular holes, orbital walls fractures, |
|
|
and non-metallic may penetrate to the ocular adnexa, |
post-traumatic cataract surgery, keratoplasty, anti- |
|
|
eyeball, orbit or even maxillary sinusal structures or |
glaucoma surgeries) may be delayed until partial healing |
|
|
brain (Biehl et al 1999). Therefore, detailed diagnostic |
of the post-traumatic wound have been achieved or |
|
|
procedures with possible ultrasound, X-ray and CT |
make the decision on surgical operation time |
|
|
are very important in the field hospital already. Open |
dependent on the course of therapy (Gos et al 2001). |
|
|
globe injuries damage ocular adnexa (eyelids, |
As it was already mentioned, the outcome of |
|
|
conjunctiva, cornea, and sclera) in nearly all instances. |
treatment is sometimes unsatisfactory for the patient |
|
|
|
|||
Copious hemorrhage, edema, and pain are usually |
but adequate visual acuity may be preserved. The |
|
|
seen. Plastic, gunpowder, sand, dust, and bacterial |
treatment is always surgical in such cases and should |
|
|
pathogens are deposited in the eye following open |
be carried out in the specialist centers, following |
|
|
globe injuries. Each ocular war open injury is |
medical evacuation from the regions of direct military |
|
|
considered infected and requires antibiotic therapy as |
operations. It is always connected with the necessary |
|
|
soon as possible. Therefore, an incidence of intraocular |
hospitalization, surgical treatment, and sometimes |
|
|
inflammation after any injury is rare because an early |
discharge. |
|
|
administration of antibacterial agents. |
|
|
|
|
Closed Globe Injuries |
|
|
|
It is different in case of the closed globe injuries. As |
|
|
|
ocular wounds usually force the victim to seek medical |
|
|
|
aid, contusions (especially mild) are often ignored. |
|
|
|
Some authors estimate that contusions constitute about |
|
|
|
50% of all ocular injuries (Kozuchowska 1986). |
|
|
|
Symptomatology of these injuries varies from no |
|
|
|
symptoms and signs to the immediate blindness of the |
|
|
|
injured eye, depending on the severity of trauma. The |
|
|
|
following symptoms usually accompany the contusion: |
|
|
|
blurred vision, reddening, hemorrhage, pain, |
|
|
|
photophobia, sensation of veils, dots, “curtains” in the |
|
|
|
front of eye, sight instability (Szaflik et al 1998). All |
|
|
|
these symptoms are usually the reason of early |
|
|
Fig. 49.2: Scar after corneoscleral wound caused by |
reporting to the ophthalmologic clinic, enabling an |
|
|
early diagnosis and proper treatment which is often |
|
||
landmine shrapnel in a soldier of Iraqi operation |
|
||
less invasive (e.g. in retinal detachment) than that |
|
||
|
|
||
The treatment is frequently two-staged. The firs stage |
delayed. Post-traumatic sequels may develop |
|
|
asymptomatically or the symptoms may be scare, slow |
|
||
takes place as soon as possible after reporting to the |
|
||
(e.g. retinal peripheral injuries), and may easily be |
|
||
doctor. It comprises post-traumatic wounds care with |
|
||
overlooked by the patient (Waclawiak-Dabrowska et |
|
||
anatomical structures reconstruction and intensive anti- |
|
||
al 2007). It may be the case of peripheral retinal |
|
||
inflammatory therapy with antibiotic therapy. Foreign |
|
||
detachment, which may lead to complete detachment |
|
||
bodies are removed and eyelids, conjunctival, scleral, |
|
||
of retina (Fig. 49.3). Similar situation concerns sequels |
|
||
and retinal wounds are sutured. |
|
||
of the peripheral hemorrhages into the retina. |
|
||
Then, the patient should be evacuated to the |
|
||
Fibroproliferative changes leading to the secondary |
|
||
centers, where the treatment aimed at proper sight |
|
||
retinal detachment may develop after months following |
|
||
functioning reconstruction is possible. Timing plays an |
|
||
the injury (Bajaire et al 2006). Properly performed |
|
||
important role in the treatment of the open globe |
|
||
laser therapy mainly protects the patient against such |
|
||
injuries. The majority of surgeries should be carried |
|
||
complications. However, the patient should regularly |
|
||
out soon after injury, as remote outcome frequently |
|
||
report to follow-up visits in order to not overlooking |
|
||
depend on the time of surgery. It is especially true in |
|
||
preventable complications. |
|
||
case of retinal detachment, IOFB and intraorbital |
|
||
|
|
|
|
foreign bodies removal, perforating eyeball wounds, |
MULTIORGAN INJURIES |
|
|
intraocular inflammation, prophylactic retinal |
|
||
photocoagulation. Other injuries may (and sometimes |
The firs group is usually related to multiorgan injuries, |
|
|
should) wait until partial healing of the post-traumatic |
mainly craniofacial. Ophthalmologists are participating |
|
|
wound have been achieved. The treatment of some |
to the specialist team dealing with the treatment and |
|
|
open globe injuries (e.g. eyelids plasty, hemorrhagic |
patients care. Prospective studies have shown that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
incidence of post-traumatic nerve damage is shown |
||
|
||
|
in the Table 49.3 (Mariak et al 2002). |
TABLE 49.3: Post-traumatic nerve damage
Damaged nerve |
Percentage of injuries |
|
|
|
|
Optic nerve II |
1.2 |
to 16% |
Oculomotor nerve III |
2.4 |
to 15.8% |
Trochlear nerve IV |
0.15 to 20% |
|
Trigeminal nerve V |
1.3 |
to 4.2% |
Abducent nerve VI |
2 to 26% |
|
Facial nerve VII |
2.0 |
to 60% |
|
|
|
|
Fig. 49.5: Post-traumatic lens subluxation in a soldier |
|
Figs 49.3A and B: Choroidal ruptures, subretinal |
of Iraqi operation |
|
Post-traumatic damage of these nerves, especially |
||
hemorrhage and peripheral retinal dialysis (black arrows) |
||
after blunt trauma of eyeball in soldier during service in Iraq. |
partial, may be overlooked during patient’s hospita- |
|
Yellow arrows indicate barrage retinal laser coagulation |
lization immediately after injury. Such patients are |
|
|
usually hospitalized in emergency wards, their health |
|
|
status is severe and there is no possibility to perform |
|
|
complete ophthalmologic examination. These patients |
|
|
frequently report to the ophthalmologist with some |
|
|
delay. Delayed treatment of the ocular injuries poses |
|
|
quite a problem. Treatment in such cases do not differ |
|
|
from these used in any ophthalmologic center. |
Fig. 49.4: Total retinal detachment with superior retinal laceration after blunt trauma
craniocerebral trauma involved the damage of at least one cranial nerves connected with the organ of vision (cranial nerves II–VII). Risk factors of these nerves damage include: severity of trauma (it should be noted that these nerves damage occurred also in mild injuries in about 10%), causative factor and its energy, skull base fractures, and intracranial hematomas. An
Fig. 49.6: Post-traumatic optic nerve atrophy in a soldier of Iraqi operation
Ocular War Injuries |
|
305 |
||
PROPHYLAXIS OF THE OCULAR INJURIES IN |
agents is determined by its localization, identity, and |
|
||
THE BATTLEFIELD |
neutralization. This action may be related to both |
|
||
Prophylaxis is of utmost importance due to such |
military and terrorist operations. In general, mass |
|
||
serious complications of the ocular injuries. It is, |
destruction weapon is divided into chemical warfare, |
|
||
however, quite limited in the battlefield. Nevertheless, |
biological warfare, and nuclear warfare. Mass destruc- |
|
||
an incidence of ocular diseases may be partially reduced. |
tion weapons may be transported by artillery shells, |
|
||
It is justified by the health and economic reasons. |
ballistic missiles or bombs. Chemical and biological |
|
||
The most important is eye protection (special |
warfare agents may additionally be thrown down in |
|
||
|
||||
protective goggles) during all military operations, which |
containers or dispersed from aircrafts. |
|
||
protect the eyes against dust and other contaminants |
Chemical Warfare |
|
||
and all minor ocular injuries. Glasses of eye protective |
|
|||
devices should be made of polycarbons of 2.3 or |
History of sulphur fumes and hot pitch use is as old |
|
||
3 mm thick. They may protect against injuries of kinetic |
as history of wars. These agents were used in Greece |
|
||
energy up to 18 J or even higher, depending on the |
(Peloponnesian Wars) and in China already in the 5th |
|
||
direction of action. Eye protective devices should be |
century BC. Chemical warfare was extensively used |
|
||
safe, comfortable, disperse an impact on the large |
as battlefield weapons during the I World War. In 1914, |
|
||
craniofacial surface, not limiting the field of vision, and |
French and Germans use chlorine, and in 1915, |
|
||
not to stem up. Sometimes such goggles are made |
Germans used hydrogen cyanide (prussic acid) and |
|
||
individually for every soldier, taking his sight defects, |
Yperite (mustard gas). Ever since, an international |
|
||
needs, habits, craniofacial anatomy, and type of effected |
community elaborated various agreements that aimed |
|
||
operations into consideration (Chizh et al 1999). |
at disarming under strict and effective control. In 1925, |
|
||
Moreover, wearing of contact lenses should be |
chemical warfare was banned by the Geneva Protocol. |
|
||
banned. Their proper cleaning and observation of rules |
The Polish government put a motion on biological |
|
||
concerning the wear of these lenses are difficult during |
warfare ban, which was added to this Protocol. In |
|
||
military operations. Between military operations, |
1972, Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention was |
|
||
recommendations depend on the climatic conditions |
agreed upon and ultimately signed by 108 countries |
|
||
and environment. Military operations in the deserts |
in 1975. In 1993, Chemical Weapons Convention on |
|
||
require wearing sunglasses with side shield, protecting |
the Prohibition of the Development, Production, |
|
||
not only against excessive insolation but also against |
Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on |
|
||
sand. It the tropics, special attention should be paid |
Their Destruction came into force. Unfortunately, there |
|
||
to insects as their bites may produce not only diseases |
are cases of unobserving these agreements. |
|
||
but also allergic reactions. |
Chemical warfare agents can be grouped into |
|
||
|
|
military toxic agents (military gases, volatile liquids |
|
|
Non-mechanical Ocular War |
dispersed as aerosols), and military auxiliary agents |
|
||
(incendiary agents, defoliants, tear gas). Toxic effect |
|
|||
Injuries |
|
|
||
of these agents always depends on the dose, i.e. |
|
|||
OCULAR WAR INJURIES RESULTING FROM |
concentration and duration of action of the said |
|
||
substance. |
|
|||
THE USE OF MASS DESTRUCTION WEAPONS |
Military toxic agents |
|
||
Use of the mass destruction weapons aims—from the |
|
|||
Depending on the effect, military toxic agents are |
|
|||
tactic point of view—at attaining the best possible |
|
|||
grouped into nervous system damaging agents (nerve |
|
|||
military effect without engaging a lot of means and |
|
|||
agents), blister agents, suffocating, choking, and |
|
|||
number of soldiers. Unfortunately, such an effect is |
|
|||
hallucinogenic compounds. Remaining agents may |
|
|||
related to not only maximum enemy loss but also civil |
|
|||
produce only transient ocular irritation manifested by |
|
|||
population and complete destruction of non-military |
|
|||
reddening and lacrimation. |
|
|||
objects and environmental pollution in case of nuclear |
|
|||
1. Phosphororganic compounds (nervous system |
|
|||
weapon use. However, maximum effect on the eyes |
|
|||
has chemical warfare agents, out of all types of |
damaging agents, nerve agents): Phosphororganic |
|
||
weapons. These agents significantly decrease ability to |
compounds are volatile liquids. They absorbed from |
|
||
carry military actions due to visual disturbances and |
airways and conjunctiva as well as from the skin, if |
|
||
accompanying ailments. |
contaminated clothes were not earlier removed. They |
|
||
Presenting an effect of chemical warfare agents on |
were primarily used as insecticides (pesticides), i.e. plant |
|
||
the organ of vision, we propose to use military and |
protection agents. However, it was found that they |
|
||
not medical terminology. An action of chemical warfare |
are highly toxic for humankind. As chemical warfare |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
||
|
the following compounds are used: tabun (GA), sarin |
2. Blister agents: These agents serve to decrease |
|||
|
|
||||
|
|
(GB), soman (GD), cyclosarin (GF), and X gases (VX |
military capability by the local burning effects or forcing |
||
|
|
or AX). Recent reports on the use of these agents come |
wearing the protective clothes, which markedly reduce |
||
|
|
from Iran-Iraq conflict in 1987. These agents act by |
mobility. Such agents include: sulphur mustard gas |
||
|
|
blocking acetylcholinesterase (AchE). Accumulation of |
(HD), nitrogen mustard gas (HN), lewisite (L), |
||
|
|
acetylcholine in the parasympathetic nerves endings |
phosgene oxime (CX). These agents produce chemical |
||
|
|
produce muscarinic effect in the iris and ciliary body, |
ocular burns, burns of airways, skin, intestines, and |
||
|
|
lacrimal gland and conjunctival blood vessels. Effects |
affect circulatory system. |
||
|
|||||
|
|
of nerve agents are also visible in the bronchi, bladder, |
i. Mustard gas (Yperite): Sulfur mustard (sulfur |
||
|
|
gastrointestinal tract, and heart. Nicotine effect is |
|||
|
|
Yperite) is one of the oldest and best-known chemical |
|||
|
|
connected with acetylcholine accumulation in the |
|||
|
|
weapons. It was used for the first time by Germans |
|||
|
|
postsynaptic part of the myoneural junction and some |
|||
|
|
sympathetic ganglia. Laboratory confirmation of |
near the city of Ypres (Belgium; it took its name after |
||
|
|
intoxication is a decrease in erythrocyte AchE. |
the name of this city) in 1915. Later, it was used by |
||
|
|
Ocular symptoms are the earliest and occur at the |
Italians in Ethiopia in 1936, Japanese during the war |
||
|
|
lowest dose. They include: Maximum miosis (lasting |
with China in 1937, Iran-Iraq conflict in 1985-1988; |
||
|
|
up to 14 days), sensation of pressure and weight in |
Iraq used it also against Kurdish minority in 1988. |
||
|
|
the eyeballs, ocular pain, injection of the conjunctiva. |
Nitrogen mustard, manufactured for the first time in |
||
|
|
Miosis may be accompanied by sight disorders, |
1935, is a new generation of the burning chemical |
||
|
|
especially peripheral, whereas ciliary body stimulation |
warfare agents. One should remember that it might |
||
|
|
– transient accommodation myopia. There may occur |
be used in the contemporary battlefields. |
||
|
|
intraocular pressure (IOP) disorders: decrease in IOP |
Mustard gas is a liquid used in the form of an |
||
|
|
related to the reduction in aqueous production or an |
aerosol. It easily penetrates through military uniforms, |
||
|
|
increase in IOP from the papillary block. Then, a |
ordinary clothes, skin, and mucous membranes. This |
||
|
|
sequence of general symptoms follows, including: pain |
compound may also persist in humid soil and water |
||
|
|
of the frontal region, rhinorrhea, hypersalivation, |
in the colloidal form for days. Mechanism of its action |
||
|
|
sweating, bradycardia, chest pain, bronchospasm and |
on the tissues is not fully explained. However, it is |
||
|
|
dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, |
known that DNA, RNA, cellular membranes, enzymes |
||
|
|
involuntary miction, and defecation, somnolence, |
and proteins are damaged by the alkilation with |
||
|
|
speech disorders, muscular tremor, convulsions, |
particular affinity to guanine. This leads to cytotoxic, |
||
|
|
parestesis, pulmonary edema, blood pressure drop, |
cytostatic, and mutagenic effects (Dabrowska et al |
||
|
|
paralysis of the respiratory muscles, respiratory arrest, |
|||
|
|
1994). Characteristic feature of mustard gas is latency, |
|||
|
|
and death. General symptoms may persist for some |
|||
|
|
lasting for several to dozens hours. Then, progressing |
|||
|
|
days. High doses cause death within some minutes. |
|||
|
|
lesions develop, producing irreversible damage. |
|||
|
|
Medical management of intoxication with phos- |
|||
|
|
The eye is the organ most sensitive to mustard gas. |
|||
|
|
phororganic agents includes so-called pretreatment, |
|||
|
|
Threshold of its stimulation is 10-fold lower than that |
|||
|
|
i.e. pyridostigmine administration. It reversibly binds |
|||
|
|
for skin and airways. Even if characteristic odor of |
|||
|
|
AChE for about 12 hours, blocking this way an entry |
|||
|
|
Yperite (mustard) is not detectable, the first ocular |
|||
|
|
of phosphororganic |
agents. |
Pyridostigmine |
|
|
|
symptoms of contamination may appear within one |
|||
|
|
administration should immediately be discontinued, |
|||
|
|
hour. These ocular symptoms occur most frequently |
|||
|
|
if contamination was detected. Protection against |
|||
|
|
in about 4 to 6 hours in the form of burning sensation, |
|||
|
|
chemical attack in the battlefield includes wearing a |
|||
|
|
photophobia, blurred vision, and painful blepharo- |
|||
|
|
facemask, which protects the eyes and airways for |
|||
|
|
spasm. Simultaneously, mustard gas is penetrating the |
|||
|
|
about 30 minutes. Within aid procedures, prefilled |
|||
|
|
skin, leading to the general poisoning. |
|||
|
|
syringes with atropine should used (it has muscarinic |
|||
|
|
In order of incidence, the following symptoms are |
|||
|
|
anticholinergic activity), oxime drug (nicotinic |
|||
|
|
cholinergic action), |
and |
benzodiazepine |
observed: mild conjunctivitis (75%), severe conjunc- |
|
|
(anticonvulsant). Drugs should be injected |
tivitis with superficial keratitis – a symptom of orange |
||
|
|
subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Atropine dose is |
rind, edema and eyelids reddening (15%), superficial |
||
|
|
repeated every 5 to 15 minutes, depending on the |
corneal abrasions – erosions, and inflammation with |
||
|
|
degree of poisoning and achievement of the general |
injection in the corneal limbus, lesions to the eyelids |
||
|
|
atropinization. Next phase of management is victim |
epithelium (10%), deep corneal injury with ulceration, |
||
|
|
evacuation from the battlefield, removal of the |
neovascularization, necrosis of conjunctiva, and deep |
||
|
|
contaminated clothes, skin decontamination, airways |
burns of eyelid skin (Solberg et al 1997). Ocular |
||
|
|
cleaning (suction), oxygen therapy, and transportation |
response to the contamination may include also |
||
|
|
to the medical station. |
|
|
adherence of the iris to the cornea, leading ultimately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
