Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.49 Mб
Скачать

Bottle Cork Injury to the Eye

297

 

 

 

Fig. 48.1: Compression > decompression > passing beyond primary position

intraocular structures that can result in various different lesions (Fig. 48.1).

From an analysis of different kinds of bottle corks, the plastic ones were found to ensure good tightness on account of their inherent tension, so that when the bottle is opened a kind of explosive discharge of energy is released. On the contrary, the natural cork expands inside the bottle because of the inner damp ambient and its discharge is consequently less violent.

A particular type of sparkling wine is manufactured in the province of Modena, which ferments, generating pressure inside the bottle that can cause the ejection of the cork similar to that of a bottle of champagne.

In Modena University we collected a series of 34 consecutive cases of bottle–cork eye injury admitted to the Ophthalmology Institute of Modena in the last 8 years that needed hospitalization. We assessed the anatomic and functional consequences of the injury in a retrospective study.10

Of the cases of eye injury admitted to our department in this 8-years period, 11% were bottle cork injuries, 13% were occupational accidents, 5% were road accidents, 13% were sport injuries, 23% were domestic accidents, and other types accounted for 35%.

In all cases the bottle cork or cap hit the eye of the person opening the bottle, did not involve bystanders in any case. Sparkling wine was involved in all cases: white in 71%, and red in 29%; 38% of the bottles were homemade wine and 62% were commercial. The types of cork were as follows: 38% stoppers without wire, 32% corks and 30% metal crown caps.

About seasonal distribution, there’s a greater incidence in January, on account of the holiday period, and in October, due to wine fermentation which influences the internal pressure of the bottle (Fig. 48.2). All cases are closed–globe injury according to Kuhn’s classification.11,12

Fig. 48.2: Month-by-month distribution of bottle cork eye injuries

Clinical Features

The clinical features more frequently observed are:

Hyphema (79%) (Figs 48.3 and 48.4)

Corneal edema (59%)

Periferic retinal edema (24%)

Subluxation of the crystalline lens (21%)

(Fig. 48.5)

Retinal hemorrhage (18%)

Iridodialysis (15%) (Fig. 48.6)

Retinal tear (9%)

Posterior pole retinal edema with macular involvement causing a poor vision acuity (6%)

Retinal detachment (6%)

Complete displacement of the IOL (3%)

Traumatic cataract (3%)

298

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 48.3: Hyphema

Fig. 48.4: Hyphema

Fig. 48.5: Lens subluxation

Sequelas are:

Pupil motility anomalies (21%)

Traumatic cataract (21%)

Post-traumatic ocular hypertension (6%)

Maculopathy (3%)

Optic neuropathy (3%)

Fig. 48.6: Iridodialysis

Treatment

In most of the cases the treatment consists of general medical practice and use of local anti-hemorragic and anti-inflammatory medication.

In some cases it can be necessary to treat the ocular hypertension with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors administered generally and with beta-blockers administered locally.

Surgical treatment is necessary in the most severe cases:

If a lens luxation occurs it is necessary to perform a complete Via Pars Plana Vitrectomy, preferably with Posterior Hyaloid removal, and make a secondary IOL scleral fixation. Recently, the approach can be done with transconjunctival mini-invasive (25, 23G) strategies. In these cases a Iris fixation secondary implantation could be the gold standard, avoiding in this way to open the conjunctiva.

In case of traumatic cataract, a phacoemulsification could be difficult depending on the grade of subluxation. If vitreous is in anterior chamber, a vitrectomy is necessary, via limbus or via pars plana, using preferably a mini-invasive (25, 23G) approach.

In presence of retinal detachment, after an accurate examination we can choose for an episcleral approach or for internal approach with vitrectomy: in the last situation the choice of the tamponade agent depends on the retinal situation and the preferences of the surgeon.

The iris injuries need adequate iris plastic surgery, even if many cases of iridodialysis, usually well limited, don’t need surgical treatment.

Prevention

In most of the cases visual acuity on admission was generally very low, and although most patients made an almost complete recovery, very severe visual impairment was observed in others.

Bottle Cork Injury to the Eye

 

299

These cases prove that bottle cork eye injury can

5.

Koval R, Teller J, Belkin M, Romem M, Yanko L, Savir

 

involve very severe traumas, although most patients re-

 

H. The Isaraeli ocular injuries study. A nationwide

 

cover almost totally with appropriate medical treatment.

 

collaborative study. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:776-80.

 

More information and prevention is needed,

6.

Archer D, Galloway NR. Champagne-cork injury to the

 

particularly in certain periods of the year and in specific

 

eye. Lancet 1967;2:487-9.

 

areas of the country. It is advisable to fit bottles with

7.

Delori F, Pomerantzeff O, Cox MS. Deformation of the

 

safety devices and/or include captions describing the

 

globe under high-speed impact: its relation to contusion

 

hazard posed by bottle caps/corks.4 Moreover, the

 

injuries. Invest Ophthalmol 1969;8:290-301.

 

introduction of a standardized type of screwable cork

8.

Greven CM. Retinal Breaks. In: Yanoff M, Duker JS (eds)

 

could be effective in preventing ejection. Alternatively

 

Opthalmology. Mosby, Philadelphia, section 8,

 

the use of a contention system, connecting the cork

 

1999;38.2.

 

 

9.

Rubsamen PE. Posterior Segment Ocular Trauma. In:

 

to the bottle neck with a wire, could represent another

 

 

Yanoff M, Duker JS (eds) Opthalmology. Mosby,

 

preventive possibility.

 

 

 

Philadelphia, section 8, 1999;43.2-3.

 

 

 

 

References

10.

Cavallini GM, Lugli N, Campi L, Pagliani L, Saccarola P.

 

 

Bottle –cork injury to the eye: a review of 13 cases. Eur

 

1. Al Salem M, Sheriff SMM. Ocular injuries from carbonated

 

J Ophthalmol 2003;13(3):287-91.

 

soft drink bottle explosions. Br J Ophthalmol 1984;

11.

Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers

 

68:281-3.

 

JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular

 

2. Gupta AK, Nadiger M, Moraes O. Ocular injury from a

 

trauma. Ophthalmology 1996;103(2):240-3.

 

carbonated beverage bottle. J Pediatr Ophthalmol

 

 

12.

Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM Sr, Bridges WZ

 

Strabismus 1980;17:394-5.

 

 

Jr, Capone A Jr, Cardillo JA, de Juan E Jr, Kuhn F,

 

3. Sellar PW, Johnston PB. Ocular injuries due to exploding

 

 

 

Meredith TA, Mieler WF, Olsen TW, Rubsamen P, Stout

 

bottles of carbonated drinks. BMJ 1991;303:176-7.

 

 

4. Kuhn F, Mester V, Morris R, Dalma J. Serious eye injuries

 

T. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye

 

caused by bottles containing carbonated drinks. Br J

 

(globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. Am J

 

Ophthalmol 2004;88:69-71.

 

Ophthalmol 1997;123(6):820-31.

 

 

 

 

 

 

C H A P T E R

49Ocular War Injuries

Jaroslaw Kulinski, Karol Stasiak, Marek Prost (Poland)

Introduction

In our times of global terrorism the occurrence of injuries caused by the explosives is not limited only to the battlefields but also to the countries which do not wage war. Very often civilians in seemingly peaceful cities are more frequently victims of such a trauma than military personnel on the modern battlefield. So speaking about “war injuries” that this description should be nowadays applied not only the soldiers but also to the civilians.

Eyes occupy only 0.29% of the body surface and 4% of the face surface. However, ocular injuries are extremely important health problem, because of their predominating role in perception. Despite the fact that eyeballs are relatively small organ, their direct injuries are usually extensive and severe. It is due to the short distance and proximity of the explosives. They are mainly caused by the explosive wave and objects of different size colliding with the human body with very high speed and kinetic energy. Even with small diameter such factors may produce severe ocular damages. They results not only in extensive injuries but also in severe functional outcomes (Fig. 49.1). It is estimated that ocular injuries are bilateral in 15 to 25% of cases.

Fig. 49.1: Eye-bulb atrophy in a soldier after blunt ocular trauma during Iraqi operation

Percentage of soldiers who experienced ocular injuries is increasing with the consecutive wars and military conflicts. Inaccurate data indicate that this percentage accounted for about 1.5 to 2% during the I World War, about 2 to 3.3% during the II World War, 3 to 8% during the Korean War, 5 to 9% of casualties in Vietnam, about 10% in Arab-Israeli War and 13% of Iraqis operations. (Ari 2006, Homblass 1981, Heier et al, 1993, La Plana et al 1997, Mader et al 1993). Various authors state that ocular injuries connected with military operations (wars, terrorist actions, landmine clearing) accounts for 16% of all injuries. It is due to an increase in head trauma by about 40% in 1982-2005, compared to an increase of all injuries and wounds by 12% (Rustemeyer et al 2007).

One should bear in mind that the first specialist ophthalmologic aid may be delayed during the war. Despite usually efficient medical evacuation medical help is not always possible immediately after trauma. Moreover, war injuries frequently involve several organs, additionally delaying ophthalmologic examination and treatment.

Field hospital should be equipped with basic ophthalmologic devices, enabling examination of the globe anterior segment and eye fundus in the slit lamp. Physician-ophthalmologist, ophthalmologic technician or optometrist should carry out examination of the eyes. Very important is access to the split lamp in examination room of the field hospital. This lamp enables preliminary evaluation of the degree and severity of trauma and decision on the further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Some field hospitals are also equipped in teleconsultaion system. Help of specialists from other health care centers is possible in some difficult cases.

Demographic characteristics of patients reporting to the field hospital with eye diseases depend on the type of military operations in the said region. Bancroft and Lattimore saw only 48 (3%) patients with ocular injuries out of 1471 patients who reported to the

Ocular War Injuries

 

 

 

 

 

 

301

ophthalmologic service in the transportation base

Mechanical Ocular War Injuries

 

support hospital during 9 months in 1995 (Bancroft

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

et al 2001). Remaining 168 (11%) patients presented

GLOBEAND ADNEXAL INJURIES

 

 

 

with ocular diseases, requiring an intensive treatment.

Global and adnexal injuries may be classified in several

 

Nine patients required evacuation from the military

 

ways. First of all, they may be classified by causative

 

operation region but not necessary surgical treatment

 

factor as: incised, punctured, crushed, lacerated, and

 

in other specialist centers. However, this hospital was

 

contused injuries. Ocular injuries may also be classified

 

located some hours of drive from the front line.

 

by anatomical structures involved. To unify the classi-

 

Statistics cited by the authors working in vicinity

 

fication of mechanical ocular injuries the International

 

of the military operations are far worse. Thach et al

 

Trauma Classification was approved in 1996 (Table

 

noted 797 severe ocular injuries, including as many

 

49.1) (Fryczkowki et al 2003), Kuhn et al 1996,

 

as 438 open globe injuries, in the war in Iraq during

 

Pieramici et al 1997).

 

 

 

 

 

34 months (from March 2003 to December 2005)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Thach et al 2008). Enucleation was performed in 116

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 49.1: International ocular trauma classification

 

 

cases, including 6 patients with bilateral enucleation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open

Closed

 

 

 

Heier reported 108 (14%) patients with ocular injuries

 

 

 

 

out of 767 wounded, including 20 patients had to be

Type

A Rupture

A Contusion

 

 

evacuated for further specialist treatment, during

 

B

Penetrating

B Laceration

 

 

Operation Desert Storm (1990-1991) (Heier et al

 

C IOFB

C Superficial FB

 

 

1993). Retrospective study carried out by Muzaffar

 

D Perforating

D Mixed

 

 

 

 

E

Mixed

 

-

-

 

 

et al. a total of 91 eyes of 51 men, clearing landmines

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Degree

1

>20/40

1 >20/40

 

 

in the aftermath of the Russo-Afghan war, were

 

 

operated within 39 months (from November 1992

by visual

2

20/50–20/100

2 20/50–20/100

 

 

acuity

3

19/100–20/800

3 19/100–20/800

 

 

to January 1996) (Muzaffar et el 2000). Total blindness

 

 

 

4

19/800–LP

4 19/800–LP

 

 

(NPL) was seen in 37.5% of the eyes, and visual acuity

 

 

 

 

5 NLP

5 NLP

 

 

 

was below cfbe. in further 20.8%. Only 16.4% of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zone

I

Cornea to

I

External

 

 

injuries were classified as mild with VA over 0.3. Eyelids

 

 

 

 

corneoscleral

 

 

 

 

 

plasty (50% of eyes), evisceration (23.1%), and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

limbus

 

 

 

 

 

vitrectomy (17.6%) predominated in the treatment.

 

II

Within 5 mm of

II

Anterior segment

 

 

It should be mentioned that all these patients

 

 

the limbus

 

 

 

 

 

worked without any eye protection. Bajaire et al

 

III Sclera more than

III Posterior segment

 

 

published data on performed vitreo-retinal surgeries

 

 

5 mm from limbus

 

 

 

 

 

during a 8-year follow-up period (from January 1995

Marcus

Positive

Positive

 

 

 

to June 2003) (Bajaire et el 2006). As much as 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gunn

Negative

Negative

 

 

of injuries involved zone I to the corneal limbus, 44%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

– zone II from the corneal limbus to 5 mm behind

Below ocular injuries that may result from the

 

it, 16% of injuries were localized in zone III in the

 

military operations are briefly discussed. However, the

 

posterior globe pole. Visual acuity in 98% eyes was

 

authors focus on the specific ocular war injuries. Sequels

 

below 1/40. During vitrectomy, silicone oil was used

 

of the globe injuries by anatomical structures presents

 

in 65% of cases, perfluorocarbons in 21%, lensectomy

 

Table 49.2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

in 82%, IOFB was removed in 72% of cases, and

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management varies in dependence on the type of

 

endolaser was used in 81% of cases. Improvement

 

injury. As it is seen in the table, the treatment is

 

was seen in 43%, stabilization in 41%, and sight

 

frequently surgical. Therefore, knowledge, experience,

 

worsening in 15% of cases. Factors of poor prognosis

 

proper equipment in the wards and OR are required.

 

included: lesions in zone III, retinal detachment,

 

Applied procedures do not differ from these used in

 

intraocular inflammation, and perforating trauma.

 

any ophthalmologic center.

 

 

 

 

 

From the above listed data, it results that ocular

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

injuries constitute serious problem, not only medical

Open Globe Injuries

 

 

 

 

 

but also social and economic. Americans estimated that

 

 

 

 

 

Open globe injuries are one of the most severe ocular

 

the cost of one soldier exclusion from the service due

 

to ocular injury for 5.9 days on average amounted

injuries. They are most frequently produced by

 

to $6295 (Buckingham et al 2001). Ocular injuries

landmine blasts or hand grenades. It is estimated that

 

may be classified as multiorgan, when the eye is only

such injuries constitute 50 to 80% of trauma in the

 

one of many damaged organs, and uniorgan, involving

contemporary battlefields with penetrating and

 

the eye and adnexa only.

perforating wounds with IOFB predominance, often

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

302

 

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 49.2: Globe injuries by anatomical structures

 

 

 

 

 

Anatomical structure

Type of injury

Sequel

Treatment

 

Prognosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eyelids

Abrasion, closed or open

Upper lid ptosis, lacrimal tract

S

 

Good

 

 

 

global injury

disruption, hemorrhage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lacrimal apparatus

Dislocation

Edema

S

 

Good

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lacrimal ducts

Disruption

Lacrimation, inflammation

S

 

Good

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conjunctiva

Abrasion, rupture

Hemorrhage, defects

S

 

Good

 

 

Cornea

Epithelial abrasion

Recurrent defects

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Rupture of the

Scars, keratoconus,

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

posterior limiting

corneal edema,

 

 

 

 

 

 

membrane of the cornea

anterior adhesions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sclera

Rupture

Uveal prolapse, vitreous prolapse,

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

 

retinal impaction, hypotonia, loss of vision,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

inflammation, retinal detachment, glaucoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abrasion

Hemorrhage

C

 

Good

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anterior chamber

Rupture of the iris sphincter

Photophobia

C/S

 

Good

 

 

 

Iridodialysis

Inflammation

C/S

 

Good

 

 

 

Iridoschisis

Edema

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Angle recession

Inflammation

C

 

 

 

 

 

Hyphema

Corneal incrustation,

C/S

 

Favorable

 

 

 

 

secondary glaucoma

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pupillary muscles paralysis

Photophobia

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Traumatic iritis

Adhesions, secondary glaucoma

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Refraction disorders

Hypermetropia, myopia

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Vitreous hernia

Vitreous base avulsion, retinal

C

 

Good

 

 

 

 

detachment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lens

Opacities (Vossius’

Cataract

C,

 

Good

 

 

 

rings, subcapsular,

 

sometimes

 

 

 

 

 

disseminated, diffused)

 

awaiting

 

 

 

 

 

Luxation

Deterioration of sight

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

Subluxation

Refraction disorders

C/S

 

Poor

 

 

 

Rupture of the

Opacity – cataract

S

 

Good

 

 

 

lenticular capsule

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vitreous

Hemorrhage

Opacities, sparkling floaters,

C/S

 

Poor

 

 

 

 

photoreceptors damage,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posterior vitreous

retinal pigmentation

C

 

Good

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

detachment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retina

Tear, detachment

Complete retinal detachment

S

 

Poor

 

 

 

from the limbus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retinal detachment

Worsening, loss of vision

S

 

Poor

 

 

 

Commotio retinae

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Berlin’s edema,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terson syndrome,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purtscher’s angiopathic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

retinopathy, peripheral

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

retinal edema)

Vision deterioration

C

 

Favorable

 

 

 

Hemorrhage

Vision deterioration,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

proliferations, retinal detachment

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

Macular hole

Vision deterioration

Laser

 

Poor

 

 

 

 

 

therapy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Choroid

Rupture

Retinal detachment

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

Detachment of the

Intraocular pressure drop – papilledema,

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

ciliary body

retinal edema, choroidal detachment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post-traumatic inflammation

Scotoma

C

 

Good

 

 

 

Lesions to the ciliary

Accommodation disorders, lens dislocation,

 

 

 

 

 

 

muscles or nerves

ciliary muscle spasm

C

 

Good

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orbit

Hemorrhage

Optic nerve and orbital structures compression

S

 

 

 

 

 

Soft tissues edema

Optic nerve and orbital structures compression

S/C

 

Poor

 

 

 

Fracture of the orbital walls

Orbital structures and eyeball damage

S

 

Poor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Optic nerve

Rupture of the optic

Partial damage

C

 

Good

 

 

 

nerve II vessels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Detachment

Vision loss

C

 

Poor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legend: S – surgical treatment ; C– conservative treatment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ocular War Injuries

 

303

multiple (about 80%). Foreign bodies, both metallic

vitreous opacities, macular holes, orbital walls fractures,

 

and non-metallic may penetrate to the ocular adnexa,

post-traumatic cataract surgery, keratoplasty, anti-

 

eyeball, orbit or even maxillary sinusal structures or

glaucoma surgeries) may be delayed until partial healing

 

brain (Biehl et al 1999). Therefore, detailed diagnostic

of the post-traumatic wound have been achieved or

 

procedures with possible ultrasound, X-ray and CT

make the decision on surgical operation time

 

are very important in the field hospital already. Open

dependent on the course of therapy (Gos et al 2001).

 

globe injuries damage ocular adnexa (eyelids,

As it was already mentioned, the outcome of

 

conjunctiva, cornea, and sclera) in nearly all instances.

treatment is sometimes unsatisfactory for the patient

 

 

Copious hemorrhage, edema, and pain are usually

but adequate visual acuity may be preserved. The

 

seen. Plastic, gunpowder, sand, dust, and bacterial

treatment is always surgical in such cases and should

 

pathogens are deposited in the eye following open

be carried out in the specialist centers, following

 

globe injuries. Each ocular war open injury is

medical evacuation from the regions of direct military

 

considered infected and requires antibiotic therapy as

operations. It is always connected with the necessary

 

soon as possible. Therefore, an incidence of intraocular

hospitalization, surgical treatment, and sometimes

 

inflammation after any injury is rare because an early

discharge.

 

administration of antibacterial agents.

 

 

 

 

Closed Globe Injuries

 

 

It is different in case of the closed globe injuries. As

 

 

ocular wounds usually force the victim to seek medical

 

 

aid, contusions (especially mild) are often ignored.

 

 

Some authors estimate that contusions constitute about

 

 

50% of all ocular injuries (Kozuchowska 1986).

 

 

Symptomatology of these injuries varies from no

 

 

symptoms and signs to the immediate blindness of the

 

 

injured eye, depending on the severity of trauma. The

 

 

following symptoms usually accompany the contusion:

 

 

blurred vision, reddening, hemorrhage, pain,

 

 

photophobia, sensation of veils, dots, “curtains” in the

 

 

front of eye, sight instability (Szaflik et al 1998). All

 

 

these symptoms are usually the reason of early

 

Fig. 49.2: Scar after corneoscleral wound caused by

reporting to the ophthalmologic clinic, enabling an

 

early diagnosis and proper treatment which is often

 

landmine shrapnel in a soldier of Iraqi operation

 

less invasive (e.g. in retinal detachment) than that

 

 

 

The treatment is frequently two-staged. The firs stage

delayed. Post-traumatic sequels may develop

 

asymptomatically or the symptoms may be scare, slow

 

takes place as soon as possible after reporting to the

 

(e.g. retinal peripheral injuries), and may easily be

 

doctor. It comprises post-traumatic wounds care with

 

overlooked by the patient (Waclawiak-Dabrowska et

 

anatomical structures reconstruction and intensive anti-

 

al 2007). It may be the case of peripheral retinal

 

inflammatory therapy with antibiotic therapy. Foreign

 

detachment, which may lead to complete detachment

 

bodies are removed and eyelids, conjunctival, scleral,

 

of retina (Fig. 49.3). Similar situation concerns sequels

 

and retinal wounds are sutured.

 

of the peripheral hemorrhages into the retina.

 

Then, the patient should be evacuated to the

 

Fibroproliferative changes leading to the secondary

 

centers, where the treatment aimed at proper sight

 

retinal detachment may develop after months following

 

functioning reconstruction is possible. Timing plays an

 

the injury (Bajaire et al 2006). Properly performed

 

important role in the treatment of the open globe

 

laser therapy mainly protects the patient against such

 

injuries. The majority of surgeries should be carried

 

complications. However, the patient should regularly

 

out soon after injury, as remote outcome frequently

 

report to follow-up visits in order to not overlooking

 

depend on the time of surgery. It is especially true in

 

preventable complications.

 

case of retinal detachment, IOFB and intraorbital

 

 

 

 

foreign bodies removal, perforating eyeball wounds,

MULTIORGAN INJURIES

 

intraocular inflammation, prophylactic retinal

 

photocoagulation. Other injuries may (and sometimes

The firs group is usually related to multiorgan injuries,

 

should) wait until partial healing of the post-traumatic

mainly craniofacial. Ophthalmologists are participating

 

wound have been achieved. The treatment of some

to the specialist team dealing with the treatment and

 

open globe injuries (e.g. eyelids plasty, hemorrhagic

patients care. Prospective studies have shown that

 

 

 

 

 

304

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

incidence of post-traumatic nerve damage is shown

 

 

in the Table 49.3 (Mariak et al 2002).

TABLE 49.3: Post-traumatic nerve damage

Damaged nerve

Percentage of injuries

 

 

 

Optic nerve II

1.2

to 16%

Oculomotor nerve III

2.4

to 15.8%

Trochlear nerve IV

0.15 to 20%

Trigeminal nerve V

1.3

to 4.2%

Abducent nerve VI

2 to 26%

Facial nerve VII

2.0

to 60%

 

 

 

 

Fig. 49.5: Post-traumatic lens subluxation in a soldier

Figs 49.3A and B: Choroidal ruptures, subretinal

of Iraqi operation

Post-traumatic damage of these nerves, especially

hemorrhage and peripheral retinal dialysis (black arrows)

after blunt trauma of eyeball in soldier during service in Iraq.

partial, may be overlooked during patient’s hospita-

Yellow arrows indicate barrage retinal laser coagulation

lization immediately after injury. Such patients are

 

usually hospitalized in emergency wards, their health

 

status is severe and there is no possibility to perform

 

complete ophthalmologic examination. These patients

 

frequently report to the ophthalmologist with some

 

delay. Delayed treatment of the ocular injuries poses

 

quite a problem. Treatment in such cases do not differ

 

from these used in any ophthalmologic center.

Fig. 49.4: Total retinal detachment with superior retinal laceration after blunt trauma

craniocerebral trauma involved the damage of at least one cranial nerves connected with the organ of vision (cranial nerves II–VII). Risk factors of these nerves damage include: severity of trauma (it should be noted that these nerves damage occurred also in mild injuries in about 10%), causative factor and its energy, skull base fractures, and intracranial hematomas. An

Fig. 49.6: Post-traumatic optic nerve atrophy in a soldier of Iraqi operation

Ocular War Injuries

 

305

PROPHYLAXIS OF THE OCULAR INJURIES IN

agents is determined by its localization, identity, and

 

THE BATTLEFIELD

neutralization. This action may be related to both

 

Prophylaxis is of utmost importance due to such

military and terrorist operations. In general, mass

 

serious complications of the ocular injuries. It is,

destruction weapon is divided into chemical warfare,

 

however, quite limited in the battlefield. Nevertheless,

biological warfare, and nuclear warfare. Mass destruc-

 

an incidence of ocular diseases may be partially reduced.

tion weapons may be transported by artillery shells,

 

It is justified by the health and economic reasons.

ballistic missiles or bombs. Chemical and biological

 

The most important is eye protection (special

warfare agents may additionally be thrown down in

 

 

protective goggles) during all military operations, which

containers or dispersed from aircrafts.

 

protect the eyes against dust and other contaminants

Chemical Warfare

 

and all minor ocular injuries. Glasses of eye protective

 

devices should be made of polycarbons of 2.3 or

History of sulphur fumes and hot pitch use is as old

 

3 mm thick. They may protect against injuries of kinetic

as history of wars. These agents were used in Greece

 

energy up to 18 J or even higher, depending on the

(Peloponnesian Wars) and in China already in the 5th

 

direction of action. Eye protective devices should be

century BC. Chemical warfare was extensively used

 

safe, comfortable, disperse an impact on the large

as battlefield weapons during the I World War. In 1914,

 

craniofacial surface, not limiting the field of vision, and

French and Germans use chlorine, and in 1915,

 

not to stem up. Sometimes such goggles are made

Germans used hydrogen cyanide (prussic acid) and

 

individually for every soldier, taking his sight defects,

Yperite (mustard gas). Ever since, an international

 

needs, habits, craniofacial anatomy, and type of effected

community elaborated various agreements that aimed

 

operations into consideration (Chizh et al 1999).

at disarming under strict and effective control. In 1925,

 

Moreover, wearing of contact lenses should be

chemical warfare was banned by the Geneva Protocol.

 

banned. Their proper cleaning and observation of rules

The Polish government put a motion on biological

 

concerning the wear of these lenses are difficult during

warfare ban, which was added to this Protocol. In

 

military operations. Between military operations,

1972, Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention was

 

recommendations depend on the climatic conditions

agreed upon and ultimately signed by 108 countries

 

and environment. Military operations in the deserts

in 1975. In 1993, Chemical Weapons Convention on

 

require wearing sunglasses with side shield, protecting

the Prohibition of the Development, Production,

 

not only against excessive insolation but also against

Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on

 

sand. It the tropics, special attention should be paid

Their Destruction came into force. Unfortunately, there

 

to insects as their bites may produce not only diseases

are cases of unobserving these agreements.

 

but also allergic reactions.

Chemical warfare agents can be grouped into

 

 

 

military toxic agents (military gases, volatile liquids

 

Non-mechanical Ocular War

dispersed as aerosols), and military auxiliary agents

 

(incendiary agents, defoliants, tear gas). Toxic effect

 

Injuries

 

 

of these agents always depends on the dose, i.e.

 

OCULAR WAR INJURIES RESULTING FROM

concentration and duration of action of the said

 

substance.

 

THE USE OF MASS DESTRUCTION WEAPONS

Military toxic agents

 

Use of the mass destruction weapons aims—from the

 

Depending on the effect, military toxic agents are

 

tactic point of view—at attaining the best possible

 

grouped into nervous system damaging agents (nerve

 

military effect without engaging a lot of means and

 

agents), blister agents, suffocating, choking, and

 

number of soldiers. Unfortunately, such an effect is

 

hallucinogenic compounds. Remaining agents may

 

related to not only maximum enemy loss but also civil

 

produce only transient ocular irritation manifested by

 

population and complete destruction of non-military

 

reddening and lacrimation.

 

objects and environmental pollution in case of nuclear

 

1. Phosphororganic compounds (nervous system

 

weapon use. However, maximum effect on the eyes

 

has chemical warfare agents, out of all types of

damaging agents, nerve agents): Phosphororganic

 

weapons. These agents significantly decrease ability to

compounds are volatile liquids. They absorbed from

 

carry military actions due to visual disturbances and

airways and conjunctiva as well as from the skin, if

 

accompanying ailments.

contaminated clothes were not earlier removed. They

 

Presenting an effect of chemical warfare agents on

were primarily used as insecticides (pesticides), i.e. plant

 

the organ of vision, we propose to use military and

protection agents. However, it was found that they

 

not medical terminology. An action of chemical warfare

are highly toxic for humankind. As chemical warfare

 

 

 

 

 

 

306

 

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

the following compounds are used: tabun (GA), sarin

2. Blister agents: These agents serve to decrease

 

 

 

 

(GB), soman (GD), cyclosarin (GF), and X gases (VX

military capability by the local burning effects or forcing

 

 

or AX). Recent reports on the use of these agents come

wearing the protective clothes, which markedly reduce

 

 

from Iran-Iraq conflict in 1987. These agents act by

mobility. Such agents include: sulphur mustard gas

 

 

blocking acetylcholinesterase (AchE). Accumulation of

(HD), nitrogen mustard gas (HN), lewisite (L),

 

 

acetylcholine in the parasympathetic nerves endings

phosgene oxime (CX). These agents produce chemical

 

 

produce muscarinic effect in the iris and ciliary body,

ocular burns, burns of airways, skin, intestines, and

 

 

lacrimal gland and conjunctival blood vessels. Effects

affect circulatory system.

 

 

 

of nerve agents are also visible in the bronchi, bladder,

i. Mustard gas (Yperite): Sulfur mustard (sulfur

 

 

gastrointestinal tract, and heart. Nicotine effect is

 

 

Yperite) is one of the oldest and best-known chemical

 

 

connected with acetylcholine accumulation in the

 

 

weapons. It was used for the first time by Germans

 

 

postsynaptic part of the myoneural junction and some

 

 

sympathetic ganglia. Laboratory confirmation of

near the city of Ypres (Belgium; it took its name after

 

 

intoxication is a decrease in erythrocyte AchE.

the name of this city) in 1915. Later, it was used by

 

 

Ocular symptoms are the earliest and occur at the

Italians in Ethiopia in 1936, Japanese during the war

 

 

lowest dose. They include: Maximum miosis (lasting

with China in 1937, Iran-Iraq conflict in 1985-1988;

 

 

up to 14 days), sensation of pressure and weight in

Iraq used it also against Kurdish minority in 1988.

 

 

the eyeballs, ocular pain, injection of the conjunctiva.

Nitrogen mustard, manufactured for the first time in

 

 

Miosis may be accompanied by sight disorders,

1935, is a new generation of the burning chemical

 

 

especially peripheral, whereas ciliary body stimulation

warfare agents. One should remember that it might

 

 

– transient accommodation myopia. There may occur

be used in the contemporary battlefields.

 

 

intraocular pressure (IOP) disorders: decrease in IOP

Mustard gas is a liquid used in the form of an

 

 

related to the reduction in aqueous production or an

aerosol. It easily penetrates through military uniforms,

 

 

increase in IOP from the papillary block. Then, a

ordinary clothes, skin, and mucous membranes. This

 

 

sequence of general symptoms follows, including: pain

compound may also persist in humid soil and water

 

 

of the frontal region, rhinorrhea, hypersalivation,

in the colloidal form for days. Mechanism of its action

 

 

sweating, bradycardia, chest pain, bronchospasm and

on the tissues is not fully explained. However, it is

 

 

dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps,

known that DNA, RNA, cellular membranes, enzymes

 

 

involuntary miction, and defecation, somnolence,

and proteins are damaged by the alkilation with

 

 

speech disorders, muscular tremor, convulsions,

particular affinity to guanine. This leads to cytotoxic,

 

 

parestesis, pulmonary edema, blood pressure drop,

cytostatic, and mutagenic effects (Dabrowska et al

 

 

paralysis of the respiratory muscles, respiratory arrest,

 

 

1994). Characteristic feature of mustard gas is latency,

 

 

and death. General symptoms may persist for some

 

 

lasting for several to dozens hours. Then, progressing

 

 

days. High doses cause death within some minutes.

 

 

lesions develop, producing irreversible damage.

 

 

Medical management of intoxication with phos-

 

 

The eye is the organ most sensitive to mustard gas.

 

 

phororganic agents includes so-called pretreatment,

 

 

Threshold of its stimulation is 10-fold lower than that

 

 

i.e. pyridostigmine administration. It reversibly binds

 

 

for skin and airways. Even if characteristic odor of

 

 

AChE for about 12 hours, blocking this way an entry

 

 

Yperite (mustard) is not detectable, the first ocular

 

 

of phosphororganic

agents.

Pyridostigmine

 

 

symptoms of contamination may appear within one

 

 

administration should immediately be discontinued,

 

 

hour. These ocular symptoms occur most frequently

 

 

if contamination was detected. Protection against

 

 

in about 4 to 6 hours in the form of burning sensation,

 

 

chemical attack in the battlefield includes wearing a

 

 

photophobia, blurred vision, and painful blepharo-

 

 

facemask, which protects the eyes and airways for

 

 

spasm. Simultaneously, mustard gas is penetrating the

 

 

about 30 minutes. Within aid procedures, prefilled

 

 

skin, leading to the general poisoning.

 

 

syringes with atropine should used (it has muscarinic

 

 

In order of incidence, the following symptoms are

 

 

anticholinergic activity), oxime drug (nicotinic

 

 

cholinergic action),

and

benzodiazepine

observed: mild conjunctivitis (75%), severe conjunc-

 

 

(anticonvulsant). Drugs should be injected

tivitis with superficial keratitis – a symptom of orange

 

 

subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Atropine dose is

rind, edema and eyelids reddening (15%), superficial

 

 

repeated every 5 to 15 minutes, depending on the

corneal abrasions – erosions, and inflammation with

 

 

degree of poisoning and achievement of the general

injection in the corneal limbus, lesions to the eyelids

 

 

atropinization. Next phase of management is victim

epithelium (10%), deep corneal injury with ulceration,

 

 

evacuation from the battlefield, removal of the

neovascularization, necrosis of conjunctiva, and deep

 

 

contaminated clothes, skin decontamination, airways

burns of eyelid skin (Solberg et al 1997). Ocular

 

 

cleaning (suction), oxygen therapy, and transportation

response to the contamination may include also

 

 

to the medical station.

 

 

adherence of the iris to the cornea, leading ultimately