Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma
.pdfToxic Anterior Segment Syndrome |
|
257 |
|
Proactive reporting to local regulatory authorities and |
Conclusion |
|
|
seeking support from colleagues, as well as academic |
|
||
TASS outbreaks have become of major concern in |
|
||
and public health resources is advisable.10,27 |
|
||
|
the ophthalmology community. The assembly of the |
|
|
CASE AND OUTBREAK DEFINITION |
TASS task force and the numerous recent studies on |
|
|
the subject has assisted in controlling TASS outbreaks. |
|
||
Postoperative anterior segment inflammation of |
|
||
The final task force report concluded that there was |
|
||
unknown cause occurring within 48 hours of surgery |
|
||
no one factor attributable to TASS outbreaks but rather |
|
||
with one or more of the following features: anterior |
|
||
multiple potential etiological factors. It appeared that |
|
||
chamber response 2+ or greater, fibrin, membranes, |
|
||
cleaning and sterilization of instruments for cataract |
|
||
corneal edema without significant vitritis.10 Criteria for |
|
||
surgery was the most important of the identified factors. |
|
||
a TASS outbreak have not been established as they |
|
||
It is recommended that all reusable cannulas and |
|
||
have for conditions such as DLK.28 However, any |
|
||
instruments be thoroughly flushed with sterile, |
|
||
occurrence of more than two affected patients should |
|
||
deionized/distilled water after cleaning at the conclusion |
|
||
raise concerns and merit investigation since this may |
|
||
of each case.29 |
|
||
rapidly escalate. |
Although TASS outbreak reports, at least in the |
|
|
|
|
||
DATACOLLECTION |
United States, now appear to be declining it is |
|
|
important to constantly monitor and improve cleaning |
|
||
Suggested data include; demographics, VA before and |
and sterilization protocols. Growing awareness resulting |
|
|
after surgery, symptoms, clinical features, day of |
in early diagnosis and treatment, with prompt |
|
|
surgery, day of onset and diagnosis, any associated |
dissemination of new information will hopefully |
|
|
conditions, subsequent management and outcome. It |
eliminate TASS as a significant complication of modern |
|
|
is important to record details of the surgical procedure |
cataract surgery. |
|
|
including instrument preparation and specifically any |
|
|
|
staffing or procedural changes made prior to the onset. |
References |
|
|
Retrospective collection of data is difficult and it is |
|
||
recommended to collect data and note changes as they |
|
|
|
1. Monson MC, Mamalis N, Olson RJ. Toxic anterior |
|
||
happen making the creation of an epidemic curve less |
|
||
segment inflammation following cataract surgery. J |
|
||
problematic. |
|
||
Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:184-9. |
|
||
MICROBIAL INVESTIGATIONS |
2. Breebaart AC, Nuyts RMMA, Pels E, et al. Toxic |
|
|
endothelial destruction of the cornea after routine |
|
||
Bacterial culturing, biofilm sampling and analysis of |
extracapsular cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; |
|
|
108:1121-5. |
|
|
|
steam distillate and BSS for endotoxin may help |
|
|
|
3. Kreisler KR, Martin SS, Young CW, et al. Postoperative |
|
||
determine the cause of the outbreak. The sterilizer |
|
||
inflammation following cataract extraction caused by |
|
||
reservoir, internal tubing of the sterilizer, ultrasound |
|
||
bacterial contamination of the cleaning bath detergent. |
|
||
baths, cannulas and air and water supplies have proved |
J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:106-10. |
|
|
to be useful sampling areas.10,12,13 |
4. Nelson DB, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. Sterile |
|
|
TASS investigations are often difficult and require |
endophthalmitis after sutureless cataract surgery. |
|
|
careful planning. It is usually best to designate one |
Ophthalmolgy 1992; 99:1655-7. |
|
|
5. Liu H, Routley I, Teichmann KD. Toxic endothelial cell |
|
||
staff member to manage the outbreak, including data |
|
||
destruction from intraocular benzalkonium chloride. J |
|
||
collection and media consultation. Another important |
|
||
Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:1746-50. |
|
||
issue to consider is the disclosure of TASS as a further |
|
||
6. Jehan FS, Mamalis N, Spencer TS, et al. Postoperative |
|
||
risk of cataract surgery, particularly during a TASS |
sterile endophthalmitis (TASS) with the MemoryLens. J |
|
|
outbreak. |
Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:1773-7. |
|
|
Once an investigation has been concluded dissemi- |
7. Eleftheriadis H, Cheong M, Saneman S, et al. Corneal |
|
|
nation of the findings will help other practitioners solve |
toxicity secondary to inadvertent use of benzalkonium |
|
|
chloride preserved viscoelastic material in cataract |
|
||
their TASS outbreaks or hopefully avoid them. The |
|
||
surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:299-305. |
|
||
TASS task force is one example of how this sharing |
|
||
8. Werner L, Sher JH, Taylor JR, et al. Toxic anterior |
|
||
of knowledge has likely reduced the risk of further |
|
||
segment syndrome and possible association with |
|
||
outbreaks. |
ointment in the anterior chamber following cataract |
|
|
|
surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:227-35. |
|
|
INVESTIGATION |
9. Hellinger WC, Hasan SA, Bacalis LP, et al. Outbreak of |
|
|
toxic anterior chamber syndrome following cataract |
|
||
Suspect everything. |
|
||
surgery associated with impurities of autoclave steam |
|
||
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
moisture. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006; |
www.ascrs.org/press_releases/Toxic-Anterior-Segment- |
||
|
|
|||
|
27(13):294-8. |
|
Syndrome-Outbreak-Preliminary-Report.cfm. |
|
|
|
10. Holland SP, Morck DW, Chavez G, Lee, TL. Toxic anterior |
20. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
|
|
|
segment syndrome. In Agarwal A (Ed). Refractive Surgery |
(ASCRS) (2005). Press release May 22, 2006: TASS |
|
|
|
Nightmares: Conquering Refractive Surgery Catastrophes. |
Outbreak Update. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http:/ |
|
|
|
Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated. In press. |
/www.ascrs.org/press_releases/upload/Update |
|
|
|
11. Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, et al. Toxic |
Briefing.doc. |
|
|
|
anterior segment syndrome. Review/update. J Cataract |
21. Parikh C, Sippy BD, Martin DF, Edelhauser HF. Effects |
|
|
|
Refract Surg 2006; 32:324-33. |
of enzymatic sterilization detergents on the corneal |
|
|
||||
|
|
12. Holland SP, Chavex G, Morck D, Mathias. Toxic Anterior |
endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:165-72. |
|
|
|
Segment Syndrome After Cataract Surgery Associated |
||
|
|
22. Whitby JL, Hitchins VM. Endotoxin levels in steam and |
||
|
|
with Short-Cycle Sterilization presented at the ASCRS |
||
|
|
reservoirs of table-top steam sterilzers. J Cataract Refract |
||
|
|
Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, San |
||
|
|
Surg 2002; 18:51-2. |
||
|
|
Francisco, USA , March 17-22, 2006. Available at |
||
|
|
23. Meltzer, DW. Sterile hypopyon following intraocular lens |
||
|
|
www.ascrs.org. Accessed June 12, 2006. |
||
|
|
surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98:100-4. |
||
|
|
13. Holland SP, Morck D, Lee T. Update on toxic anterior |
||
|
|
24. US Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Patient |
||
|
|
segment syndrome. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. |
||
|
|
advisory Feb 13th 2006; FDA-Requested Recall - Cytosol |
||
|
|
In press. |
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratories, Inc. Product Contains Dangerous Levels of |
|
|
|
14. Van Gelder RN. Applications of the polymerase chain |
||
|
|
Endotoxin. Retrieved Feb. 14, 2006, from http:// |
||
|
|
reaction to diagnosis of ophthalmic disease. Surv |
||
|
|
www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2006/NEW01315.html. |
||
|
|
Ophthalmol 2001; 45(3):248-58. |
||
|
|
25. Holland SP, Mathias RG, Morck DW, et al. Diffuse |
||
|
|
15. West ES, Behrens A, McDonnell PJ, et al. The incidence |
||
|
|
lamellar keratitis related to endotoxins released from |
||
|
|
of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery among the US |
||
|
|
sterilizer reservoir biofilms. Ophthalmol 2000; 107(7): |
||
|
|
medicare population increased between 1994 and 2001. |
||
|
|
1227-33. |
||
|
|
Ophthalmology 2005; 112:1388-95. |
||
|
|
26. Rietschel ET, Brade H. Bacterial endotoxins. Sci Am 1992; |
||
|
|
16. Wallin T, Parker J, Jin Y, et al. Cohort study of 27 cases |
||
|
|
267:54-61. |
||
|
|
of endophthalmitis at a single institution. J Cataract |
||
|
|
27. Mamalis, N. TASS outbreaks: What should we do? |
||
|
|
Refract Surg 2005; 31:735-41. |
||
|
|
Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today, July 2006;53-5. |
||
|
|
17. Duffy RE, Brown SE, Caldwell KL, et al. An epidemic of |
||
|
|
28. Bigham M, Enns CL, Holland SP, et al. Diffuse lamellar |
||
|
|
corneal destruction caused by plasma gas sterilization; |
||
|
|
the toxic endothelial cell destruction syndrome team. |
keratitis complicating laser in situ keratomileusis; |
|
|
|
Arch Ophthalmology 2000;118:1167-76. |
postmarketing surveillance of an emerging disease in |
|
|
|
18. Moshirfar M, Whitehead G, Beutler BC, et al. Toxic |
British Columbia, Canada, 2000-2002. J Cataract Refract |
|
|
|
anterior segment syndrome after Verisyse iris-supported |
Surg 2005; 31:2340-44. |
|
|
|
phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract |
29. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
|
|
|
Surg 2006; 32(7):1233-7. |
(ASCRS). (2005). Press release September 22, 2006: |
|
|
|
19. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS) Outbreak Final |
|
|
|
(ASCRS) (2005). Press release June 22, 2006: TASS task |
Report. Retrieved September 22, 2006, from http:// |
|
|
|
force. Retrieved |
August 15, 2006, from http:// |
www.ascrs.org/press_releases/Final-TASS-Report.cfm. |
|
|
|
|
|
C H A P T E R
41Small Pupil Phaco:
An Innovative Technique
Boris Malyugin (Russia)
Introduction
In spite of several recent innovations in cataract surgery patients with small pupils are always challenging.
Poor pupil dilation we can be observed in cases complicated by pseudoexfoliation syndrome, uveitis, posterior synechiae, trauma or previous intraocular surgery.1-6
Significant amount of patients who present for phacoemulsification cataract surgery have pupils that do not respond adequately despite several pharmacological attempts with different mydriatic agents. Inadequate pupil dilation can decrease visualization during all stages of the phacoemulsification including capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, lens nucleus disassembly and IOL insertion. This compromises the surgery and increases the risk for complications.
Pharmacological therapy with the use of nonsteroidal eyedrops or strong mydriatics such as phenylephrine 10% sometimes lead to unwanted ocular and systemic side effects. Intracameral mydriatics is an effective, and safe addition to topical mydriatics in phacoemulsification.7 In some cases their use can simplify preoperative patients preparation and in certain high-risk groups, may reduce the risk for cardiovascular side effects.
Unfortunately present pharmacological approaches of managing a small pupil during cataract surgery have limitations. Most surgeons decide to dilate the pupil mechanically at the time of the surgery if pharmacological agents fail.
There is no general recommendation or solution to the small pupil problem because the strategies for pupil enlargement greatly depend on surgeon skill and preferences, as well as on intraoperative situation. There are four main dilation methods: the first is the synechiolysis, the second is mechanical stretching, the third is the cutting method and the fourth is the iris retraction.
In the first method—the surgeon separates the adhesions between the iris, the lens capsule and/or
the cornea. The technique of pupillary membranectomy with the forceps presented by R.Osher6 is also effective in some cases.
The second method—mechanical stretching of the pupil was introduced by Miller and Keener.8 It is usually effective for small pupils with the rigid iris tissue which is usually caused by prior miotic use, pseudoexfoliation, or posterior synechiae. Stretching can be achieved with the spatula, Sinskey hook or special instrument. Beehler pupil dilator.2 Usually a pair of hooks is introduced through 2 stab incisions in the cornea engage the iris sphincter. After that the hooks are pulled in opposite directions. This maneuver creates microscopic sphincter tears which enlarge the pupil aperture. The main advantage of this procedure is that it is relatively simple and requires no special instruments. Mechanical stretching of the pupil usually provides sufficient access to the lens and maintains the pupil diameter intraoperatively.
Sometimes iris stretching technique leads to instability of it’s papillary margin, which can compromise cataract surgery. In some eyes and stretching technique fails to adequately expand the pupil.9 The drawback of this technique is that it is creating permanent damage of the iris sphincter. The micro tears of the sphincter muscle are usually clinically asymptomatic but sometimes result in bleeding and pigment dispersion postoperatively. In a study of stretch pupilloplasty by Dinsmore10 10% of 50 patients developed an enlarged atonic pupil postoperatively. All patients had a history of injury or inflammatory disease.
Partial-thickness iris sphincter cuts made with micro scissors is a common pupil enlargement technique.11 The cutting method is more controlled but requires multiple maneuvers of the scissors inside the anterior chamber which can result in corneal endothelial damage. The disadvantages are the same as those with the stretching method.
Suboptimal pupil dilation in response to the preoperative mydriatic protocols and minimal efficacy
260 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
of pupil stretching techniques is a usual indication to |
Masket19 and Yuguchi and coauthors20 recommends |
|
|
|
||
|
|
the intraoperative use of iris hooks or other mechanical |
the pupil not be stretched by the hooks to larger than |
|
|
pupil dilation devices. For the iris retraction several |
a 5.0 mm square because overstretching produces |
|
|
devices have been introduced in the clinical practice. |
irregular atonic pupils postoperatively. Novak21 suggests |
|
|
The main disadvantages of these devices include the |
the use of hooks with rigid pupils smaller than 3.0 mm |
|
|
bulkiness and rigidity. They are difficult to insert, |
(4.0 mm with a hard nucleus) and smaller than 4.0 |
|
|
remove, and manipulate through a small incision. |
to 5.0 mm for an inexperienced surgeon. In extremely |
|
|
Graether12 developed a pupil expander that |
small and rigid pupils he prefers combining the use |
|
|||
|
|
according to his data is superior to other methods of |
of hooks with a radial sphincterotomy. |
|
|
pupil enlargement, causing less sphincter trauma and |
During engagement of the pupillary edge with the |
|
|
fewer cases of permanent pupil size alteration. Pupil |
iris hook, it may catch and damage the capsule, leading |
|
|
dilation technique with the hydrogel ring reported by |
to an anterior capsule tear that may extend to the |
|
|
Siepser6 has a potential benefits but very limited clinical |
periphery. To avoid this problem, a drop of viscoelastic |
|
|
use. The Perfect Pupil device (Milvella) is a disposable |
material should be injected between the iris and the |
|
|
polyurethane ring with the 0.24 mm flanged groove |
capsule before the hook is inserted. The other useful |
|
|
throughout the length of the ring and an integrated |
technique is to keep the hook parallel to the iris plane |
|
|
arm that allows insertion and removal from the anterior |
during the insertion and to tilt it slightly posterior right |
|
|
chamber at the end of surgery.11 |
near the pupillary edge to engage the iris only. The |
|
|
Retracting the iris tissue rather than cutting it as |
iris hooks may become loosened during surgery. Their |
|
|
in a classic sector iridectomy is much simpler and results |
tips may become dislocated, no longer holding the |
|
|
in a much better postoperative pupil appearance. |
pupillary edge. This can cause some problems including |
|
|
Mackool13 was the first one who described a 4-point |
iris aspiration and chafing from contact with the |
|
|
iris retractor configuration for phacoemulsification. He |
phacoemulsification needle. |
|
|
developed metal iris retractors connected to small |
Small degrees of pupil dysfunction are common |
|
|
blocks of titanium. The latter allows for stabilization |
place after cataract surgery with and without iris mani- |
|
|
of the hooks during the retraction of the iris. This |
pulation but usually this causes no subjective |
|
|
method was enhanced with the introduction of the |
symptoms. Halpern and coauthors22 found an |
|
|
flexible iris retractor by de Juan and Hickingbotham.14 |
incidence of postoperative atonic pupil of 1.1% after |
|
|
Traditionally, 4 evenly spaced retractors are placed |
phacoemulsification, with pupil diameters ranging from |
|
|
through limbal paracentheses 90 degrees apart from |
6.0 to 8.0 mm. |
|
|
one another. The corneal incision is centered on 1 of |
Most of the surgical maneuvers for enlarging the |
|
|
the 4 sides of the square.15 Some surgeons use iris |
pupil and preventing its intraoperative constriction are |
|
|
retractors in a triangular pattern decreasing the number |
not safe enough. They can lead to an increased risk |
|
|
of additional corneal incisions. The use of the iris hooks |
of iris sphincter tear, bleeding, iris damage, posterior |
|
|
may lead to the damage of the pupillary margin |
capsule tears, and loss of the vitreous body. The |
|
|
intraoperatively producing a semimydriatic non- |
postoperative complications can include an atonic pupil |
|
|
reacting pupil postoperatively. |
of irregular shape with poor cosmetic result, and |
|
|
Modification of the original square retractor |
photophobia. |
|
|
configuration is described by16 the rotation of the square |
The rate of occurrence of iris prolapse has been |
|
|
improveslensaccessinclearcornealphacoemulsification |
reported between 0.3% and 1% in complicated cataract |
|
|
by orienting the phacoemulsification needle along the |
cases.23 Allan24 described one of the critical factors of |
|
|
diagonal. This was called by Dupps and Oetting |
iris prolapse during phaco which relates to fluid velocity. |
|
|
“diamond configuration” of retractors.17 Advantages |
Allan’s model considers the Bernoulli principle as the |
|
|
of this technique include ease of conversion from |
most important because when the velocity of fluid |
|
|
phacoemulsification, optimal orientation of the maxi- |
passing through the anterior chamber increases, the |
|
|
mum pupil diameter nucleus expression or intracapsular |
force exerted on the iris increases by the square of |
|
|
lens removal, and conservation of iris tissue. |
the velocity. |
|
|
Birhall18 assessed the effect on pupil shape and |
We calculated the speed of the emulsion in the |
|
|
circumference of various flexible iris hook positions. |
anterior chamber during the phaco procedure with the |
|
|
He confirmed that malpositioned iris hooks may |
Millenium CCS (Bausch and Lomb) for US handpiece |
|
|
increase pupil stretching with possible deleterious effects |
settings: 1.0 mm Microflow US needle, vacuum 300 mm |
|
|
on postoperative pupil function. He recommends |
Hg, bottle height 85 cm, and I/A handpiece settings: |
|
|
using additional fifth hook to create a pentagonal pupil |
coaxial handpiece, 0.3 mm opening, vacuum 550 mm |
|
|
that reduces pupil stretching by 17%. |
Hg, bottle height 90 cm. For the calculation we utilized |
|
|
|
|
Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique |
261 |
|
|
|
|
Fig. 41.1: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case when the US handpiece location in the middle of the anterior chamber at the iris plane
Fig. 41.2: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case when the US handpiece is location in the middle of the lens nucleus
the equation of Navie-Stocks. The calculations were performed for the two positions of the handpiece: in the center of the anterior chamber at the iris plane (Fig. 41.1) in the middle of the capsular bag (Fig. 41.2) and close to the center of the posterior capsule (Fig. 41.3).
Figures 41.4 and 41.5 represent the color coded map of fluid velocity distribution around the US and irrigating-aspirating handpiece. The areas of the highest currents are located in the angle of 40 to 60 degrees with the apex at the end of the aspiration orifice. Three
zones of high (more than 120 cm/sec) medium (80120 cm/sec) and low (80 cm/sec) fluid velocities are represented.
The pupil often dilates poorly in atrophic irises, with significantly decreased iris tone unable to withstand the fluidic currents in the anterior chamber and maintain the correct position of the iris. These calculations give us some conclusions. In small pupil iris tissue is located closer to the zone of the high fluidic currents that is why it is more likely to be aspirated into the US or IA handpiece. Decreasing of flow
262 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 41.3: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case of US handpiece location close to the center of the posterior capsule
Fig. 41.4: Fluid velocity distribution around the handpiece tip of the US
Fig. 41.5: Fluid velocity distribution around the tip of irrigating-aspirating handpiece
parameters is an important factor of preventing iris damage during phacoemulsification. Not only reducing the flow can make an appreciable difference in these cases, but also central positioning and minimal movements of the handpiece are also important to prevent iris damage. Endocapsular lens nucleus fragmentation is much safer because the areas of the highest fluidics currents are located inside the capsular bag away from the corneal endothelium and iris.
Chang and Campbell25 recently described the intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome (IFIS) associated with systemic administration of the Ü-1A antagonist
tamsulosin (Flomax). The intraoperative diagnostic triad of this symptom is fluttering and billowing of the iris stroma, a tendency to iris prolapse through the main and/or side-port incisions, and progressive constriction of the pupil during surgery. Stretching of the pupil is ineffective in IFIS because the iris pupil margin remains elastic and the pupil immediately snaps back to its original size following attempts at stretching it.
Viscomydriasis with high viscosity OVDs such as Healon5 are very useful in small pupil phaco cases. S.Arshinoff26 described a technique using ophthalmic
Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique |
263 |
||
viscosurgical devices to perform cataract surgery in |
|
|
|
patients taking tamsulosin. This method uses a |
|
|
|
combination of the two OVDs. The lower-viscosity |
|
|
|
dispersive OVD which is highly retentive despite the |
|
|
|
presence of moderate fluid turbulence is injected in |
|
|
|
the periphery of the anterior chamber and covers the |
|
|
|
endothelial layer and the iris. The viscoadaptive central |
|
|
|
layer of Healon5, according to S.Arshinoff adds a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
relatively rigid OVD roof above the surgical space and |
|
|
|
adds rigidity to the OVD structure to keep the iris from |
|
|
|
moving and the Viscoat in place. The BSS layer just |
|
|
|
over the pupillary space and below viscoadaptive central |
|
|
|
layer provides working space for the phaco tip. The |
Fig. 41.7: The principle of iris pupillary margin fixation |
|
|
surgeon is working in the endocapsular space and |
with the curl of IQ-ring |
|
|
Healon5 is not attracted into the phaco tip and the |
The insertion of IQ-ring is carried out through the |
|
|
OVD shell structure remains intact throughout the case. |
|
||
main incision. The pupil expander is positioned |
|
||
This technique gives satisfactory iris stability and permits |
|
||
centrally and gently pushed at each angle with the |
|
||
uneventful surgery. |
|
||
help of a Sinskey hook to trap the iris in the four curls. |
|
||
Cataract surgery in cases of iridoschisis may result |
|
||
Once in place, the ring expands the pupillary opening |
|
||
in aspiration of iris fibers flowing in the anterior |
|
||
to 6.0 mm. The IQ-ring provides stable mydriasis with |
|
||
chamber.5, 11 In these cases stretching the iris with various |
|
||
instruments or dilating the pupil with iris retractors may |
no trauma to the iris tissue and no need for additional |
|
|
paracentheses. It retracts the iris away from the flow |
|
||
not prevent the danger contact of US needle with the |
|
||
currents and thus helps to prevent its incarceration |
|
||
iris tissue and aspiration of fibers. |
|
||
Intaoperative iris manipulations may lead to severe |
into the US and I/A handpieces. As the result of the |
|
|
postoperative fibrinoid reaction especially in eyes with |
IQ-ring implantation we obtain a square, 6 mm pupil |
|
|
pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic uveitis, glaucoma |
dilation that allows for safe and comfortable maneuvers |
|
|
or diabetes. Tat is why cataract surgery in the presence |
during phacoemulsification. |
|
|
of a small pupil remains one of the most difficult and |
The ring is usually inserted at the beginning of the |
|
|
challenging cases. |
phaco procedure through an unenlarged 2.8 mm clear |
|
|
IQ-ring |
corneal incision into the pupillary aperture. The |
|
|
surgeon can control the iris without significant changes |
|
||
“To enhance phaco surgery in complicated small-pupil |
of his accustomed technique. The capsulorhexis, |
|
|
cases we designed the new device which was called |
hydrodissection, phacoemulsification, and injection of |
|
|
IQ-ring (Fig. 41.6). It is used in cases of pupil miosis |
the intraocular lens are performed through the |
|
|
refractory to dilation protocols. The device is a square, |
expanded pupil with the device in place. In case of |
|
|
O-shaped, temporary implant with four circular curls |
necessity the ring can be inserted at any stage of the |
|
|
that holds the iris at equidistant points. One-piece |
operation. |
|
|
design with the curls at each angle of the ring provides |
Cadaver eye study using scanning electronic micro- |
|
|
balanced stretching and gentle holding of the iris tissue. |
scopy showed that much less damage to the pigmented |
|
|
The main principle of iris pupillary margin fixation with |
iris tissue was caused by the new instrument than by |
|
|
the curl is represented on Figure 41.7.” |
conventional iris retractors (Figs 41.8 and 41.9). |
|
|
Surgical Technique
|
Topical anesthesia is applied using 2% lidocain, and |
|
the paracenthesis is done at 12 o’clock. A 2.8 mm |
|
temporal clear corneal incision is performed using the |
|
disposable metal blade. A dispersive ophthalmic |
|
viscosurgical device (OVD) is injected in the anterior |
|
chamber to stabilize it and protect the corneal |
|
endothelium. The IQ-ring is introduced into the AC |
|
through the clear corneal phacoincision using forceps |
|
and Sinskey hook (Fig. 41.10). The device is placed |
Fig. 41.6: The general view of IQ-ring |
in the AC and laid flat on the iris. It is then attached |
264 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 41.8: IQ-ring implantation in the cadaver eye
Fig. 41.9: Scanning electronic microscopy of the pupillary margin of the cadaver eye after implantation of the IQ-ring and conventional iris hooks
to the pupillary margin in a circular manner, resulting in a pupillary opening approximately 6.0 mm wide (Fig. 41.11). Capsulorhexis is performed using forceps or a bent needle.
Hydrodissection and hydrodelineation are performed with BSS until the nucleus could be rotated freely inside the capsular bag. Phacoemulsification is done with the Millenium CCS phacoemulsifier (Bausch and Lomb) using a modified quick-chop technique (Microflow or Kelman US needle; 36% of linear US power; pulse 10 pps, duty cycle 80%; vacuum settings at 350 mm Hg; bottle height 85 cm). A deep but short central trench is made in cases of the hard nucleus cases. The step-by-step chop in situ and lateral separation technique allows nucleus division with minimal stress on the capsular bag (Fig. 41.12).
Coaxial or bimanual irrigation/aspiration is used to clean residual cortical fibers from the capsular bag (Fig. 41.13). The capsular bag is then filled with the cohesive OVD and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) is
Fig. 41.10: IQ-ring is inserted through the main clear corneal incision
Fig. 41.11: The iris is fixated in the loops of the device
Fig. 41.12: Phacoemulsification of the nucleus with the IQ-ring in place
inserted using injector through unenlarged incision. “Forceps flexible IOL insertion usually requires incision enlargement from 3.5 to 3.75 mm”.
Then the device is loosened from the pupillary margin using a Sinskey hook and laid on the iris (Fig. 41.12).
Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique |
265 |
|
|
|
|
Fig. 41.13: Irrigation-aspiration after IOL implantation |
Fig. 41.15: The ring is removed from the anterior chamber |
and removal of the device |
through the clear corneal incision with the forceps |
Fig. 41.14: The ring is cut with the Vannas scissors |
Fig. 41.16: Final situation after surgery |
TheringiscutwiththeVannasscissorsandretractedfrom the anterior chamber through the clear corneal incision with the forceps (Figs 41.14 and 41.15). Aspiration is performed to remove the residual OVD. After viscoelasticremoval,theclearcornealincisionishydrated with balanced salt solution (BSS) (Fig. 41.16).
On the first postoperative day, the eyes presented with minor cell and flare in the anterior chamber. The pupillary margin was minimally disturbed or undamaged and the IOL well centered. We usually treat patients with small pupils after the surgery more aggressively than uncomplicated patients with topical steroids, cycloplegics, and sometimes systemic steroids Patients receive local antibiotic and steroid treatment for 4-6 weeks.
Conclusion
Adequate transpupillary access to the lens is essential to the success of phaco procedures especially in cases
with zonular weakness and capsular inadequacy. We believe that our iris retraction technique with IQ-ring has several advantages.
First, the IQ-ring does not require additional incisions. This instrument is inserted through main incision, thus reducing surgical trauma and minimizing the risk of contamination and postoperative inflammatory reaction.
Second, the device is applying pressure to the sphincter muscle over an area which is wider than in cases of iris hooks. It is particularly useful in patients in which cutting or tearing of the iris tissue should be avoided. Especially in the presence of rubeosis, chronic anterior uveitis, or systemic coagulopathy. Iris rim is safely fixed in the loops of the ring and there is no risk of iris aspiration during phacoemulsification.
Third, compared to other long-in-use iris retractors IQ-ring has the advantage of being friendlier with the eye, due to the well-distributed stretching and gentle holding of the delicate iris tissue, and to the easier and
266 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|||
|
less traumatic implantation. It has no sharp or pointed |
6. |
Vasavada A, Singh R. Phacoemulsification in eyes with a |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
endings that can damage the eye. |
7. |
small pupil. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:1210–18. |
|
|
|
Fourth, equidistant position of the loops that holds |
Lundberg B, Behndig A Intracameral mydriatics in |
||
|
|
|
phacoemulsification cataract surgeryJCataractRefractSurg |
||
|
|
the iris tissue ensure correct position of the iris and |
|
||
|
|
|
2003; 29:2366–71. |
||
|
|
prevents the effect of overstretching of the pupil |
|
||
|
|
8. |
Miller KM, Keener GT Jr. Stretch pupilloplasty for small pupil |
||
|
|
observed in incorrect iris hooks position. |
|
phacoemulsification (letter). Am J Ophthalmol 1994; |
|
|
|
Fifth, IQ-ring provides sufficient room for nucleus |
|
117:107–08. |
|
|
|
fragmentation and removal. The device configuration |
9. |
Chang DF. Phaco strategies for complicated cataracts. In: |
|
|
|||||
|
|
and plate design allows surgeon to work in the deep |
|
Chang DF, ed, Phaco Chop; Mastering Techniques, |
|
|
|
lens layers below the iris plane and the square-shaped |
|
Optimizing Technology, and Avoiding Complications. |
|
|
|
|
Thorofare, NJ, Slack 2004;173–98. |
||
|
|
pupil formed by the ring. This provides enough space |
|
||
|
|
10. |
Dinsmore SC. Modified stretch technique for small pupil |
||
|
|
for grooving and cutting the nucleus and increased |
|||
|
|
|
phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia. J Cataract |
||
|
|
peripheral visualization during the chopping phase of |
|
Refract Surg 1996; 22: 27–30. |
|
|
|
the procedure. |
11. |
Auffarth G, Reuland AJ., Heger T, Volcker HE, Cataract |
|
|
|
In summary, different techniques of nucleus |
|
surgery in eyes with iridoschisis using the Perfect Pupil iris |
|
|
|
disassembly in small-incision cataract surgery requires |
|
extension system J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1877– |
|
|
|
|
80. |
||
|
|
wide and unobstructed view of the anterior portion of |
|
||
|
|
12. |
Graether JM. Graether pupil expander for managing the |
||
|
|
the lens as well as the instruments inserted in the anterior |
|||
|
|
|
small pupil during surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; |
||
|
|
chamber. The other important factor is sufficient |
|
22:530–35. |
|
|
|
manipulability of the instruments which is critical for the |
13. |
Mackool RJ. Small pupil enlargement during cataract |
|
|
|
successful completion the surgery. A pupil that fails to |
|
extraction; a new method. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; |
|
|
|
dilate makes cataract removal more difficult with added |
|
18:523–26. |
|
|
|
14. |
de Juan E Jr, Hickingbotham D. Flexible iris retractor [letter]. |
||
|
|
risk. The IQ-ring adequately dilates the pupil, prevents |
|||
|
|
|
Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 110:776–77. |
||
|
|
iris sphincter damage. It is easy to insert and remove. |
|
||
|
|
15. |
Nichamin LD. Enlarging the pupil for cataract extraction |
||
|
|
The ring expands the pupil to 6.0 mm, protects the iris |
|
using flexible nylon iris retractors. J Cataract Refract Surg |
|
|
|
sphincter during surgery, and allows the pupil to return |
|
1993; 19:793–96. |
|
|
|
toitsnormalshape,size,andfunctionaftertheoperation. |
16. |
Oetting TA, Omphroy LC. Modified technique using flexible |
|
|
|
IQ-ring is an important tool in phacoemulsification |
|
iris retractors in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract |
|
|
|
surgery. Careful intraoperative manipulation and inser- |
|
Refract Surg 2002; 28:596–98. |
|
|
|
17. |
Dupps WJ., Oetting TA. Diamond iris retractor configuration |
||
|
|
tion of the IQ-ring with liberal use of OVD can help |
|||
|
|
|
for small-pupil extracapsular or intracapsular cataract |
||
|
|
prevent complications. After the surgery most of our |
|
||
|
|
|
surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:2473–75. |
||
|
|
patients had pupils almost indistinguishable from the |
18. |
Birchall W, Spencer AF. Misalignment of flexible iris hook |
|
|
|
appearance before surgery with the preserved func- |
|
retractors for small pupil cataract surgery: effects on pupil |
|
|
|
tional activity. We consider IQ-ring among the most |
19. |
circumference. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:20–24. |
|
|
|
effective methods to increase the size of even very rigid |
Masket S. Avoiding complications associated with iris |
||
|
|
|
retractor use in small pupil cataract extraction. J Cataract |
||
|
|
small pupils during phacoemulsification surgery. We use |
|
||
|
|
|
Refract Surg 1996; 22:168–71. |
||
|
|
it in cases with IFIS syndrome with a great success. The |
|
||
|
|
20. |
YuguchiT,OshikaT,SawaguchiS,KaiyaT.Pupillaryfunctions |
||
|
|
use of this method is highly recommended as it is likely |
|
after cataract surgery using flexible iris retractor in patients |
|
|
|
to reduce postoperative abnormalities in pupil size and |
|
with small pupil. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999; 43:20-24. |
|
|
|
function. |
21. |
Novak J. Flexible iris hooks for phacoemulsification. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:828–31. |
|
|
References |
|
22. |
Halpern BL, Pavilack MA, Gallagher SP. The incidence of |
|
|
|
atonic pupil following cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol |
||
|
|
1. Drolsum L, Haaskjold E, Davanger M. Results and |
|
1995; 113:448–50. |
|
|
|
23. |
Rho DS, Kahn M, Obstbaum SA. Complications of cataract |
||
|
|
complications after extracapsular cataract extraction in eyes |
|||
|
|
|
surgery. In: Charlton JF, Weinstein GW, eds, Ophthalmic |
||
|
|
with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol |
|
||
|
|
|
Surgery Complications: Prevention and Management. |
||
|
|
(Copenh) 1993; 71:771–76. |
|
||
|
|
|
Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co., 1995; 95–116. |
||
|
|
2. Fine IH. Pupilloplasty for small pupil phacoemulsification. |
|
||
|
|
J Cataract Refract Surg 1994; 20:192–96. |
24. |
Allan BD. Mechanism of iris prolapse: a qualitative analysis |
|
|
|
3. Gimbel HV. Nucleofractis phacoemulsification through a |
|
and implications for surgical technique. J Cataract Refract |
|
|
|
small pupil. Can J Ophthalmol 1992; 27:115–19. |
|
Surg 1995; 21:182–86. |
|
|
|
4. Kershner RM. Management of the small pupil for clear |
25. |
Chang DF, Campbell JR. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome |
|
|
|
corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; |
|
associated with tamsulosin. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; |
|
|
|
28:1826–31. |
|
31:664–73. |
|
|
|
5. Smith GT, Liu CSC. Flexible iris hooks for phacoemulsi- |
26. |
Arshinoff S. Modified SST–USST for tamsulosin-associated |
|
|
|
fication in patients with iridoschisis. J Cataract Refract Surg |
|
intraocular floppy-iris syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg |
|
|
|
2000; 26:1277–80. |
|
2006; 32:559–61. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
