Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.49 Mб
Скачать

Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome

 

257

Proactive reporting to local regulatory authorities and

Conclusion

 

 

seeking support from colleagues, as well as academic

 

TASS outbreaks have become of major concern in

 

and public health resources is advisable.10,27

 

 

the ophthalmology community. The assembly of the

 

CASE AND OUTBREAK DEFINITION

TASS task force and the numerous recent studies on

 

the subject has assisted in controlling TASS outbreaks.

 

Postoperative anterior segment inflammation of

 

The final task force report concluded that there was

 

unknown cause occurring within 48 hours of surgery

 

no one factor attributable to TASS outbreaks but rather

 

with one or more of the following features: anterior

 

multiple potential etiological factors. It appeared that

 

chamber response 2+ or greater, fibrin, membranes,

 

cleaning and sterilization of instruments for cataract

 

corneal edema without significant vitritis.10 Criteria for

 

surgery was the most important of the identified factors.

 

a TASS outbreak have not been established as they

 

It is recommended that all reusable cannulas and

 

have for conditions such as DLK.28 However, any

 

instruments be thoroughly flushed with sterile,

 

occurrence of more than two affected patients should

 

deionized/distilled water after cleaning at the conclusion

 

raise concerns and merit investigation since this may

 

of each case.29

 

rapidly escalate.

Although TASS outbreak reports, at least in the

 

 

 

DATACOLLECTION

United States, now appear to be declining it is

 

important to constantly monitor and improve cleaning

 

Suggested data include; demographics, VA before and

and sterilization protocols. Growing awareness resulting

 

after surgery, symptoms, clinical features, day of

in early diagnosis and treatment, with prompt

 

surgery, day of onset and diagnosis, any associated

dissemination of new information will hopefully

 

conditions, subsequent management and outcome. It

eliminate TASS as a significant complication of modern

 

is important to record details of the surgical procedure

cataract surgery.

 

including instrument preparation and specifically any

 

 

 

staffing or procedural changes made prior to the onset.

References

 

Retrospective collection of data is difficult and it is

 

recommended to collect data and note changes as they

 

 

 

1. Monson MC, Mamalis N, Olson RJ. Toxic anterior

 

happen making the creation of an epidemic curve less

 

segment inflammation following cataract surgery. J

 

problematic.

 

Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:184-9.

 

MICROBIAL INVESTIGATIONS

2. Breebaart AC, Nuyts RMMA, Pels E, et al. Toxic

 

endothelial destruction of the cornea after routine

 

Bacterial culturing, biofilm sampling and analysis of

extracapsular cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;

 

108:1121-5.

 

 

steam distillate and BSS for endotoxin may help

 

 

3. Kreisler KR, Martin SS, Young CW, et al. Postoperative

 

determine the cause of the outbreak. The sterilizer

 

inflammation following cataract extraction caused by

 

reservoir, internal tubing of the sterilizer, ultrasound

 

bacterial contamination of the cleaning bath detergent.

 

baths, cannulas and air and water supplies have proved

J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:106-10.

 

to be useful sampling areas.10,12,13

4. Nelson DB, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. Sterile

 

TASS investigations are often difficult and require

endophthalmitis after sutureless cataract surgery.

 

careful planning. It is usually best to designate one

Ophthalmolgy 1992; 99:1655-7.

 

5. Liu H, Routley I, Teichmann KD. Toxic endothelial cell

 

staff member to manage the outbreak, including data

 

destruction from intraocular benzalkonium chloride. J

 

collection and media consultation. Another important

 

Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:1746-50.

 

issue to consider is the disclosure of TASS as a further

 

6. Jehan FS, Mamalis N, Spencer TS, et al. Postoperative

 

risk of cataract surgery, particularly during a TASS

sterile endophthalmitis (TASS) with the MemoryLens. J

 

outbreak.

Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:1773-7.

 

Once an investigation has been concluded dissemi-

7. Eleftheriadis H, Cheong M, Saneman S, et al. Corneal

 

nation of the findings will help other practitioners solve

toxicity secondary to inadvertent use of benzalkonium

 

chloride preserved viscoelastic material in cataract

 

their TASS outbreaks or hopefully avoid them. The

 

surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86:299-305.

 

TASS task force is one example of how this sharing

 

8. Werner L, Sher JH, Taylor JR, et al. Toxic anterior

 

of knowledge has likely reduced the risk of further

 

segment syndrome and possible association with

 

outbreaks.

ointment in the anterior chamber following cataract

 

 

surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:227-35.

 

INVESTIGATION

9. Hellinger WC, Hasan SA, Bacalis LP, et al. Outbreak of

 

toxic anterior chamber syndrome following cataract

 

Suspect everything.

 

surgery associated with impurities of autoclave steam

 

 

 

 

 

258

 

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

moisture. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;

www.ascrs.org/press_releases/Toxic-Anterior-Segment-

 

 

 

27(13):294-8.

 

Syndrome-Outbreak-Preliminary-Report.cfm.

 

 

10. Holland SP, Morck DW, Chavez G, Lee, TL. Toxic anterior

20. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

 

 

segment syndrome. In Agarwal A (Ed). Refractive Surgery

(ASCRS) (2005). Press release May 22, 2006: TASS

 

 

Nightmares: Conquering Refractive Surgery Catastrophes.

Outbreak Update. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http:/

 

 

Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated. In press.

/www.ascrs.org/press_releases/upload/Update

 

 

11. Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, et al. Toxic

Briefing.doc.

 

 

anterior segment syndrome. Review/update. J Cataract

21. Parikh C, Sippy BD, Martin DF, Edelhauser HF. Effects

 

 

Refract Surg 2006; 32:324-33.

of enzymatic sterilization detergents on the corneal

 

 

 

12. Holland SP, Chavex G, Morck D, Mathias. Toxic Anterior

endothelium. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120:165-72.

 

 

Segment Syndrome After Cataract Surgery Associated

 

 

22. Whitby JL, Hitchins VM. Endotoxin levels in steam and

 

 

with Short-Cycle Sterilization presented at the ASCRS

 

 

reservoirs of table-top steam sterilzers. J Cataract Refract

 

 

Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery, San

 

 

Surg 2002; 18:51-2.

 

 

Francisco, USA , March 17-22, 2006. Available at

 

 

23. Meltzer, DW. Sterile hypopyon following intraocular lens

 

 

www.ascrs.org. Accessed June 12, 2006.

 

 

surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98:100-4.

 

 

13. Holland SP, Morck D, Lee T. Update on toxic anterior

 

 

24. US Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Patient

 

 

segment syndrome. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.

 

 

advisory Feb 13th 2006; FDA-Requested Recall - Cytosol

 

 

In press.

 

 

 

 

Laboratories, Inc. Product Contains Dangerous Levels of

 

 

14. Van Gelder RN. Applications of the polymerase chain

 

 

Endotoxin. Retrieved Feb. 14, 2006, from http://

 

 

reaction to diagnosis of ophthalmic disease. Surv

 

 

www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2006/NEW01315.html.

 

 

Ophthalmol 2001; 45(3):248-58.

 

 

25. Holland SP, Mathias RG, Morck DW, et al. Diffuse

 

 

15. West ES, Behrens A, McDonnell PJ, et al. The incidence

 

 

lamellar keratitis related to endotoxins released from

 

 

of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery among the US

 

 

sterilizer reservoir biofilms. Ophthalmol 2000; 107(7):

 

 

medicare population increased between 1994 and 2001.

 

 

1227-33.

 

 

Ophthalmology 2005; 112:1388-95.

 

 

26. Rietschel ET, Brade H. Bacterial endotoxins. Sci Am 1992;

 

 

16. Wallin T, Parker J, Jin Y, et al. Cohort study of 27 cases

 

 

267:54-61.

 

 

of endophthalmitis at a single institution. J Cataract

 

 

27. Mamalis, N. TASS outbreaks: What should we do?

 

 

Refract Surg 2005; 31:735-41.

 

 

Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today, July 2006;53-5.

 

 

17. Duffy RE, Brown SE, Caldwell KL, et al. An epidemic of

 

 

28. Bigham M, Enns CL, Holland SP, et al. Diffuse lamellar

 

 

corneal destruction caused by plasma gas sterilization;

 

 

the toxic endothelial cell destruction syndrome team.

keratitis complicating laser in situ keratomileusis;

 

 

Arch Ophthalmology 2000;118:1167-76.

postmarketing surveillance of an emerging disease in

 

 

18. Moshirfar M, Whitehead G, Beutler BC, et al. Toxic

British Columbia, Canada, 2000-2002. J Cataract Refract

 

 

anterior segment syndrome after Verisyse iris-supported

Surg 2005; 31:2340-44.

 

 

phakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract

29. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

 

 

Surg 2006; 32(7):1233-7.

(ASCRS). (2005). Press release September 22, 2006:

 

 

19. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS) Outbreak Final

 

 

(ASCRS) (2005). Press release June 22, 2006: TASS task

Report. Retrieved September 22, 2006, from http://

 

 

force. Retrieved

August 15, 2006, from http://

www.ascrs.org/press_releases/Final-TASS-Report.cfm.

 

 

 

 

 

C H A P T E R

41Small Pupil Phaco:

An Innovative Technique

Boris Malyugin (Russia)

Introduction

In spite of several recent innovations in cataract surgery patients with small pupils are always challenging.

Poor pupil dilation we can be observed in cases complicated by pseudoexfoliation syndrome, uveitis, posterior synechiae, trauma or previous intraocular surgery.1-6

Significant amount of patients who present for phacoemulsification cataract surgery have pupils that do not respond adequately despite several pharmacological attempts with different mydriatic agents. Inadequate pupil dilation can decrease visualization during all stages of the phacoemulsification including capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, lens nucleus disassembly and IOL insertion. This compromises the surgery and increases the risk for complications.

Pharmacological therapy with the use of nonsteroidal eyedrops or strong mydriatics such as phenylephrine 10% sometimes lead to unwanted ocular and systemic side effects. Intracameral mydriatics is an effective, and safe addition to topical mydriatics in phacoemulsification.7 In some cases their use can simplify preoperative patients preparation and in certain high-risk groups, may reduce the risk for cardiovascular side effects.

Unfortunately present pharmacological approaches of managing a small pupil during cataract surgery have limitations. Most surgeons decide to dilate the pupil mechanically at the time of the surgery if pharmacological agents fail.

There is no general recommendation or solution to the small pupil problem because the strategies for pupil enlargement greatly depend on surgeon skill and preferences, as well as on intraoperative situation. There are four main dilation methods: the first is the synechiolysis, the second is mechanical stretching, the third is the cutting method and the fourth is the iris retraction.

In the first method—the surgeon separates the adhesions between the iris, the lens capsule and/or

the cornea. The technique of pupillary membranectomy with the forceps presented by R.Osher6 is also effective in some cases.

The second method—mechanical stretching of the pupil was introduced by Miller and Keener.8 It is usually effective for small pupils with the rigid iris tissue which is usually caused by prior miotic use, pseudoexfoliation, or posterior synechiae. Stretching can be achieved with the spatula, Sinskey hook or special instrument. Beehler pupil dilator.2 Usually a pair of hooks is introduced through 2 stab incisions in the cornea engage the iris sphincter. After that the hooks are pulled in opposite directions. This maneuver creates microscopic sphincter tears which enlarge the pupil aperture. The main advantage of this procedure is that it is relatively simple and requires no special instruments. Mechanical stretching of the pupil usually provides sufficient access to the lens and maintains the pupil diameter intraoperatively.

Sometimes iris stretching technique leads to instability of it’s papillary margin, which can compromise cataract surgery. In some eyes and stretching technique fails to adequately expand the pupil.9 The drawback of this technique is that it is creating permanent damage of the iris sphincter. The micro tears of the sphincter muscle are usually clinically asymptomatic but sometimes result in bleeding and pigment dispersion postoperatively. In a study of stretch pupilloplasty by Dinsmore10 10% of 50 patients developed an enlarged atonic pupil postoperatively. All patients had a history of injury or inflammatory disease.

Partial-thickness iris sphincter cuts made with micro scissors is a common pupil enlargement technique.11 The cutting method is more controlled but requires multiple maneuvers of the scissors inside the anterior chamber which can result in corneal endothelial damage. The disadvantages are the same as those with the stretching method.

Suboptimal pupil dilation in response to the preoperative mydriatic protocols and minimal efficacy

260

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

of pupil stretching techniques is a usual indication to

Masket19 and Yuguchi and coauthors20 recommends

 

 

 

 

the intraoperative use of iris hooks or other mechanical

the pupil not be stretched by the hooks to larger than

 

 

pupil dilation devices. For the iris retraction several

a 5.0 mm square because overstretching produces

 

 

devices have been introduced in the clinical practice.

irregular atonic pupils postoperatively. Novak21 suggests

 

 

The main disadvantages of these devices include the

the use of hooks with rigid pupils smaller than 3.0 mm

 

 

bulkiness and rigidity. They are difficult to insert,

(4.0 mm with a hard nucleus) and smaller than 4.0

 

 

remove, and manipulate through a small incision.

to 5.0 mm for an inexperienced surgeon. In extremely

 

 

Graether12 developed a pupil expander that

small and rigid pupils he prefers combining the use

 

 

 

according to his data is superior to other methods of

of hooks with a radial sphincterotomy.

 

 

pupil enlargement, causing less sphincter trauma and

During engagement of the pupillary edge with the

 

 

fewer cases of permanent pupil size alteration. Pupil

iris hook, it may catch and damage the capsule, leading

 

 

dilation technique with the hydrogel ring reported by

to an anterior capsule tear that may extend to the

 

 

Siepser6 has a potential benefits but very limited clinical

periphery. To avoid this problem, a drop of viscoelastic

 

 

use. The Perfect Pupil device (Milvella) is a disposable

material should be injected between the iris and the

 

 

polyurethane ring with the 0.24 mm flanged groove

capsule before the hook is inserted. The other useful

 

 

throughout the length of the ring and an integrated

technique is to keep the hook parallel to the iris plane

 

 

arm that allows insertion and removal from the anterior

during the insertion and to tilt it slightly posterior right

 

 

chamber at the end of surgery.11

near the pupillary edge to engage the iris only. The

 

 

Retracting the iris tissue rather than cutting it as

iris hooks may become loosened during surgery. Their

 

 

in a classic sector iridectomy is much simpler and results

tips may become dislocated, no longer holding the

 

 

in a much better postoperative pupil appearance.

pupillary edge. This can cause some problems including

 

 

Mackool13 was the first one who described a 4-point

iris aspiration and chafing from contact with the

 

 

iris retractor configuration for phacoemulsification. He

phacoemulsification needle.

 

 

developed metal iris retractors connected to small

Small degrees of pupil dysfunction are common

 

 

blocks of titanium. The latter allows for stabilization

place after cataract surgery with and without iris mani-

 

 

of the hooks during the retraction of the iris. This

pulation but usually this causes no subjective

 

 

method was enhanced with the introduction of the

symptoms. Halpern and coauthors22 found an

 

 

flexible iris retractor by de Juan and Hickingbotham.14

incidence of postoperative atonic pupil of 1.1% after

 

 

Traditionally, 4 evenly spaced retractors are placed

phacoemulsification, with pupil diameters ranging from

 

 

through limbal paracentheses 90 degrees apart from

6.0 to 8.0 mm.

 

 

one another. The corneal incision is centered on 1 of

Most of the surgical maneuvers for enlarging the

 

 

the 4 sides of the square.15 Some surgeons use iris

pupil and preventing its intraoperative constriction are

 

 

retractors in a triangular pattern decreasing the number

not safe enough. They can lead to an increased risk

 

 

of additional corneal incisions. The use of the iris hooks

of iris sphincter tear, bleeding, iris damage, posterior

 

 

may lead to the damage of the pupillary margin

capsule tears, and loss of the vitreous body. The

 

 

intraoperatively producing a semimydriatic non-

postoperative complications can include an atonic pupil

 

 

reacting pupil postoperatively.

of irregular shape with poor cosmetic result, and

 

 

Modification of the original square retractor

photophobia.

 

 

configuration is described by16 the rotation of the square

The rate of occurrence of iris prolapse has been

 

 

improveslensaccessinclearcornealphacoemulsification

reported between 0.3% and 1% in complicated cataract

 

 

by orienting the phacoemulsification needle along the

cases.23 Allan24 described one of the critical factors of

 

 

diagonal. This was called by Dupps and Oetting

iris prolapse during phaco which relates to fluid velocity.

 

 

“diamond configuration” of retractors.17 Advantages

Allan’s model considers the Bernoulli principle as the

 

 

of this technique include ease of conversion from

most important because when the velocity of fluid

 

 

phacoemulsification, optimal orientation of the maxi-

passing through the anterior chamber increases, the

 

 

mum pupil diameter nucleus expression or intracapsular

force exerted on the iris increases by the square of

 

 

lens removal, and conservation of iris tissue.

the velocity.

 

 

Birhall18 assessed the effect on pupil shape and

We calculated the speed of the emulsion in the

 

 

circumference of various flexible iris hook positions.

anterior chamber during the phaco procedure with the

 

 

He confirmed that malpositioned iris hooks may

Millenium CCS (Bausch and Lomb) for US handpiece

 

 

increase pupil stretching with possible deleterious effects

settings: 1.0 mm Microflow US needle, vacuum 300 mm

 

 

on postoperative pupil function. He recommends

Hg, bottle height 85 cm, and I/A handpiece settings:

 

 

using additional fifth hook to create a pentagonal pupil

coaxial handpiece, 0.3 mm opening, vacuum 550 mm

 

 

that reduces pupil stretching by 17%.

Hg, bottle height 90 cm. For the calculation we utilized

 

 

 

 

Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique

261

 

 

 

Fig. 41.1: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case when the US handpiece location in the middle of the anterior chamber at the iris plane

Fig. 41.2: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case when the US handpiece is location in the middle of the lens nucleus

the equation of Navie-Stocks. The calculations were performed for the two positions of the handpiece: in the center of the anterior chamber at the iris plane (Fig. 41.1) in the middle of the capsular bag (Fig. 41.2) and close to the center of the posterior capsule (Fig. 41.3).

Figures 41.4 and 41.5 represent the color coded map of fluid velocity distribution around the US and irrigating-aspirating handpiece. The areas of the highest currents are located in the angle of 40 to 60 degrees with the apex at the end of the aspiration orifice. Three

zones of high (more than 120 cm/sec) medium (80120 cm/sec) and low (80 cm/sec) fluid velocities are represented.

The pupil often dilates poorly in atrophic irises, with significantly decreased iris tone unable to withstand the fluidic currents in the anterior chamber and maintain the correct position of the iris. These calculations give us some conclusions. In small pupil iris tissue is located closer to the zone of the high fluidic currents that is why it is more likely to be aspirated into the US or IA handpiece. Decreasing of flow

262

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 41.3: Fluid velocity distribution along the line connecting the opposite points of the anterior chamber angle (X1–X2) in case of US handpiece location close to the center of the posterior capsule

Fig. 41.4: Fluid velocity distribution around the handpiece tip of the US

Fig. 41.5: Fluid velocity distribution around the tip of irrigating-aspirating handpiece

parameters is an important factor of preventing iris damage during phacoemulsification. Not only reducing the flow can make an appreciable difference in these cases, but also central positioning and minimal movements of the handpiece are also important to prevent iris damage. Endocapsular lens nucleus fragmentation is much safer because the areas of the highest fluidics currents are located inside the capsular bag away from the corneal endothelium and iris.

Chang and Campbell25 recently described the intraoperative floppy-iris syndrome (IFIS) associated with systemic administration of the Ü-1A antagonist

tamsulosin (Flomax). The intraoperative diagnostic triad of this symptom is fluttering and billowing of the iris stroma, a tendency to iris prolapse through the main and/or side-port incisions, and progressive constriction of the pupil during surgery. Stretching of the pupil is ineffective in IFIS because the iris pupil margin remains elastic and the pupil immediately snaps back to its original size following attempts at stretching it.

Viscomydriasis with high viscosity OVDs such as Healon5 are very useful in small pupil phaco cases. S.Arshinoff26 described a technique using ophthalmic

Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique

263

viscosurgical devices to perform cataract surgery in

 

 

 

patients taking tamsulosin. This method uses a

 

 

 

combination of the two OVDs. The lower-viscosity

 

 

 

dispersive OVD which is highly retentive despite the

 

 

 

presence of moderate fluid turbulence is injected in

 

 

 

the periphery of the anterior chamber and covers the

 

 

 

endothelial layer and the iris. The viscoadaptive central

 

 

 

layer of Healon5, according to S.Arshinoff adds a

 

 

 

 

 

 

relatively rigid OVD roof above the surgical space and

 

 

 

adds rigidity to the OVD structure to keep the iris from

 

 

 

moving and the Viscoat in place. The BSS layer just

 

 

 

over the pupillary space and below viscoadaptive central

 

 

 

layer provides working space for the phaco tip. The

Fig. 41.7: The principle of iris pupillary margin fixation

 

surgeon is working in the endocapsular space and

with the curl of IQ-ring

 

Healon5 is not attracted into the phaco tip and the

The insertion of IQ-ring is carried out through the

 

OVD shell structure remains intact throughout the case.

 

main incision. The pupil expander is positioned

 

This technique gives satisfactory iris stability and permits

 

centrally and gently pushed at each angle with the

 

uneventful surgery.

 

help of a Sinskey hook to trap the iris in the four curls.

 

Cataract surgery in cases of iridoschisis may result

 

Once in place, the ring expands the pupillary opening

 

in aspiration of iris fibers flowing in the anterior

 

to 6.0 mm. The IQ-ring provides stable mydriasis with

 

chamber.5, 11 In these cases stretching the iris with various

 

instruments or dilating the pupil with iris retractors may

no trauma to the iris tissue and no need for additional

 

paracentheses. It retracts the iris away from the flow

 

not prevent the danger contact of US needle with the

 

currents and thus helps to prevent its incarceration

 

iris tissue and aspiration of fibers.

 

Intaoperative iris manipulations may lead to severe

into the US and I/A handpieces. As the result of the

 

postoperative fibrinoid reaction especially in eyes with

IQ-ring implantation we obtain a square, 6 mm pupil

 

pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic uveitis, glaucoma

dilation that allows for safe and comfortable maneuvers

 

or diabetes. Tat is why cataract surgery in the presence

during phacoemulsification.

 

of a small pupil remains one of the most difficult and

The ring is usually inserted at the beginning of the

 

challenging cases.

phaco procedure through an unenlarged 2.8 mm clear

 

IQ-ring

corneal incision into the pupillary aperture. The

 

surgeon can control the iris without significant changes

 

“To enhance phaco surgery in complicated small-pupil

of his accustomed technique. The capsulorhexis,

 

cases we designed the new device which was called

hydrodissection, phacoemulsification, and injection of

 

IQ-ring (Fig. 41.6). It is used in cases of pupil miosis

the intraocular lens are performed through the

 

refractory to dilation protocols. The device is a square,

expanded pupil with the device in place. In case of

 

O-shaped, temporary implant with four circular curls

necessity the ring can be inserted at any stage of the

 

that holds the iris at equidistant points. One-piece

operation.

 

design with the curls at each angle of the ring provides

Cadaver eye study using scanning electronic micro-

 

balanced stretching and gentle holding of the iris tissue.

scopy showed that much less damage to the pigmented

 

The main principle of iris pupillary margin fixation with

iris tissue was caused by the new instrument than by

 

the curl is represented on Figure 41.7.”

conventional iris retractors (Figs 41.8 and 41.9).

 

Surgical Technique

 

Topical anesthesia is applied using 2% lidocain, and

 

the paracenthesis is done at 12 o’clock. A 2.8 mm

 

temporal clear corneal incision is performed using the

 

disposable metal blade. A dispersive ophthalmic

 

viscosurgical device (OVD) is injected in the anterior

 

chamber to stabilize it and protect the corneal

 

endothelium. The IQ-ring is introduced into the AC

 

through the clear corneal phacoincision using forceps

 

and Sinskey hook (Fig. 41.10). The device is placed

Fig. 41.6: The general view of IQ-ring

in the AC and laid flat on the iris. It is then attached

264

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 41.8: IQ-ring implantation in the cadaver eye

Fig. 41.9: Scanning electronic microscopy of the pupillary margin of the cadaver eye after implantation of the IQ-ring and conventional iris hooks

to the pupillary margin in a circular manner, resulting in a pupillary opening approximately 6.0 mm wide (Fig. 41.11). Capsulorhexis is performed using forceps or a bent needle.

Hydrodissection and hydrodelineation are performed with BSS until the nucleus could be rotated freely inside the capsular bag. Phacoemulsification is done with the Millenium CCS phacoemulsifier (Bausch and Lomb) using a modified quick-chop technique (Microflow or Kelman US needle; 36% of linear US power; pulse 10 pps, duty cycle 80%; vacuum settings at 350 mm Hg; bottle height 85 cm). A deep but short central trench is made in cases of the hard nucleus cases. The step-by-step chop in situ and lateral separation technique allows nucleus division with minimal stress on the capsular bag (Fig. 41.12).

Coaxial or bimanual irrigation/aspiration is used to clean residual cortical fibers from the capsular bag (Fig. 41.13). The capsular bag is then filled with the cohesive OVD and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) is

Fig. 41.10: IQ-ring is inserted through the main clear corneal incision

Fig. 41.11: The iris is fixated in the loops of the device

Fig. 41.12: Phacoemulsification of the nucleus with the IQ-ring in place

inserted using injector through unenlarged incision. “Forceps flexible IOL insertion usually requires incision enlargement from 3.5 to 3.75 mm”.

Then the device is loosened from the pupillary margin using a Sinskey hook and laid on the iris (Fig. 41.12).

Small Pupil Phaco: An Innovative Technique

265

 

 

 

Fig. 41.13: Irrigation-aspiration after IOL implantation

Fig. 41.15: The ring is removed from the anterior chamber

and removal of the device

through the clear corneal incision with the forceps

Fig. 41.14: The ring is cut with the Vannas scissors

Fig. 41.16: Final situation after surgery

TheringiscutwiththeVannasscissorsandretractedfrom the anterior chamber through the clear corneal incision with the forceps (Figs 41.14 and 41.15). Aspiration is performed to remove the residual OVD. After viscoelasticremoval,theclearcornealincisionishydrated with balanced salt solution (BSS) (Fig. 41.16).

On the first postoperative day, the eyes presented with minor cell and flare in the anterior chamber. The pupillary margin was minimally disturbed or undamaged and the IOL well centered. We usually treat patients with small pupils after the surgery more aggressively than uncomplicated patients with topical steroids, cycloplegics, and sometimes systemic steroids Patients receive local antibiotic and steroid treatment for 4-6 weeks.

Conclusion

Adequate transpupillary access to the lens is essential to the success of phaco procedures especially in cases

with zonular weakness and capsular inadequacy. We believe that our iris retraction technique with IQ-ring has several advantages.

First, the IQ-ring does not require additional incisions. This instrument is inserted through main incision, thus reducing surgical trauma and minimizing the risk of contamination and postoperative inflammatory reaction.

Second, the device is applying pressure to the sphincter muscle over an area which is wider than in cases of iris hooks. It is particularly useful in patients in which cutting or tearing of the iris tissue should be avoided. Especially in the presence of rubeosis, chronic anterior uveitis, or systemic coagulopathy. Iris rim is safely fixed in the loops of the ring and there is no risk of iris aspiration during phacoemulsification.

Third, compared to other long-in-use iris retractors IQ-ring has the advantage of being friendlier with the eye, due to the well-distributed stretching and gentle holding of the delicate iris tissue, and to the easier and

266

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

less traumatic implantation. It has no sharp or pointed

6.

Vasavada A, Singh R. Phacoemulsification in eyes with a

 

 

 

 

endings that can damage the eye.

7.

small pupil. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26:1210–18.

 

 

Fourth, equidistant position of the loops that holds

Lundberg B, Behndig A Intracameral mydriatics in

 

 

 

phacoemulsification cataract surgeryJCataractRefractSurg

 

 

the iris tissue ensure correct position of the iris and

 

 

 

 

2003; 29:2366–71.

 

 

prevents the effect of overstretching of the pupil

 

 

 

8.

Miller KM, Keener GT Jr. Stretch pupilloplasty for small pupil

 

 

observed in incorrect iris hooks position.

 

phacoemulsification (letter). Am J Ophthalmol 1994;

 

 

Fifth, IQ-ring provides sufficient room for nucleus

 

117:107–08.

 

 

fragmentation and removal. The device configuration

9.

Chang DF. Phaco strategies for complicated cataracts. In:

 

 

 

and plate design allows surgeon to work in the deep

 

Chang DF, ed, Phaco Chop; Mastering Techniques,

 

 

lens layers below the iris plane and the square-shaped

 

Optimizing Technology, and Avoiding Complications.

 

 

 

Thorofare, NJ, Slack 2004;173–98.

 

 

pupil formed by the ring. This provides enough space

 

 

 

10.

Dinsmore SC. Modified stretch technique for small pupil

 

 

for grooving and cutting the nucleus and increased

 

 

 

phacoemulsification with topical anesthesia. J Cataract

 

 

peripheral visualization during the chopping phase of

 

Refract Surg 1996; 22: 27–30.

 

 

the procedure.

11.

Auffarth G, Reuland AJ., Heger T, Volcker HE, Cataract

 

 

In summary, different techniques of nucleus

 

surgery in eyes with iridoschisis using the Perfect Pupil iris

 

 

disassembly in small-incision cataract surgery requires

 

extension system J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31:1877–

 

 

 

80.

 

 

wide and unobstructed view of the anterior portion of

 

 

 

12.

Graether JM. Graether pupil expander for managing the

 

 

the lens as well as the instruments inserted in the anterior

 

 

 

small pupil during surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;

 

 

chamber. The other important factor is sufficient

 

22:530–35.

 

 

manipulability of the instruments which is critical for the

13.

Mackool RJ. Small pupil enlargement during cataract

 

 

successful completion the surgery. A pupil that fails to

 

extraction; a new method. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;

 

 

dilate makes cataract removal more difficult with added

 

18:523–26.

 

 

14.

de Juan E Jr, Hickingbotham D. Flexible iris retractor [letter].

 

 

risk. The IQ-ring adequately dilates the pupil, prevents

 

 

 

Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 110:776–77.

 

 

iris sphincter damage. It is easy to insert and remove.

 

 

 

15.

Nichamin LD. Enlarging the pupil for cataract extraction

 

 

The ring expands the pupil to 6.0 mm, protects the iris

 

using flexible nylon iris retractors. J Cataract Refract Surg

 

 

sphincter during surgery, and allows the pupil to return

 

1993; 19:793–96.

 

 

toitsnormalshape,size,andfunctionaftertheoperation.

16.

Oetting TA, Omphroy LC. Modified technique using flexible

 

 

IQ-ring is an important tool in phacoemulsification

 

iris retractors in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract

 

 

surgery. Careful intraoperative manipulation and inser-

 

Refract Surg 2002; 28:596–98.

 

 

17.

Dupps WJ., Oetting TA. Diamond iris retractor configuration

 

 

tion of the IQ-ring with liberal use of OVD can help

 

 

 

for small-pupil extracapsular or intracapsular cataract

 

 

prevent complications. After the surgery most of our

 

 

 

 

surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:2473–75.

 

 

patients had pupils almost indistinguishable from the

18.

Birchall W, Spencer AF. Misalignment of flexible iris hook

 

 

appearance before surgery with the preserved func-

 

retractors for small pupil cataract surgery: effects on pupil

 

 

tional activity. We consider IQ-ring among the most

19.

circumference. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:20–24.

 

 

effective methods to increase the size of even very rigid

Masket S. Avoiding complications associated with iris

 

 

 

retractor use in small pupil cataract extraction. J Cataract

 

 

small pupils during phacoemulsification surgery. We use

 

 

 

 

Refract Surg 1996; 22:168–71.

 

 

it in cases with IFIS syndrome with a great success. The

 

 

 

20.

YuguchiT,OshikaT,SawaguchiS,KaiyaT.Pupillaryfunctions

 

 

use of this method is highly recommended as it is likely

 

after cataract surgery using flexible iris retractor in patients

 

 

to reduce postoperative abnormalities in pupil size and

 

with small pupil. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999; 43:20-24.

 

 

function.

21.

Novak J. Flexible iris hooks for phacoemulsification.

 

 

 

 

 

J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23:828–31.

 

 

References

 

22.

Halpern BL, Pavilack MA, Gallagher SP. The incidence of

 

 

 

atonic pupil following cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol

 

 

1. Drolsum L, Haaskjold E, Davanger M. Results and

 

1995; 113:448–50.

 

 

23.

Rho DS, Kahn M, Obstbaum SA. Complications of cataract

 

 

complications after extracapsular cataract extraction in eyes

 

 

 

surgery. In: Charlton JF, Weinstein GW, eds, Ophthalmic

 

 

with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol

 

 

 

 

Surgery Complications: Prevention and Management.

 

 

(Copenh) 1993; 71:771–76.

 

 

 

 

Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co., 1995; 95–116.

 

 

2. Fine IH. Pupilloplasty for small pupil phacoemulsification.

 

 

 

J Cataract Refract Surg 1994; 20:192–96.

24.

Allan BD. Mechanism of iris prolapse: a qualitative analysis

 

 

3. Gimbel HV. Nucleofractis phacoemulsification through a

 

and implications for surgical technique. J Cataract Refract

 

 

small pupil. Can J Ophthalmol 1992; 27:115–19.

 

Surg 1995; 21:182–86.

 

 

4. Kershner RM. Management of the small pupil for clear

25.

Chang DF, Campbell JR. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome

 

 

corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;

 

associated with tamsulosin. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;

 

 

28:1826–31.

 

31:664–73.

 

 

5. Smith GT, Liu CSC. Flexible iris hooks for phacoemulsi-

26.

Arshinoff S. Modified SST–USST for tamsulosin-associated

 

 

fication in patients with iridoschisis. J Cataract Refract Surg

 

intraocular floppy-iris syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg

 

 

2000; 26:1277–80.

 

2006; 32:559–61.