Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma
.pdf
Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
237 |
for the treatment of for the reduction of ocular pain and burning/stinging following corneal refractive surgery.
NSAIDs for Control of Pain
Following PRK
Fig. 27.3: Preoperative NSAIDs reduce pupil constriction during cataract surgery (Donnenfeld)
to microbial infections due to a suppressed host immune-response, retardation in corneal epithelial and stromal wound healing. Steroids are not safe for periods of extended use as prolonged use is associated with development of glaucoma, visual acuity defects and loss of visual field, and posterior subcapsular cataract formation.
A safer alternative to corticosteroids for the treatment of ocular inflammation are the NSAIDs. There are four classes of NSAIDS available for topical ophthalmic use: indoles, phenylacetic acids, an arylacetic acid pro-drug, and phenylalkanoic acids. Indomethacin 1% aqueous suspension is an indole derivative that is available outside of the United States (O’Brien). Diclofenac 1% is a water-soluble phenylacetic derivative approved by the FDA as a treatment to minimize inflammation related to cataract surgery and as a therapeutic option for the reduction of pain and photophobia after cataract surgery. Bromfenac 0.09% is a recently approved twice-daily topical phenylacetic compound indicated for the treatment of postoperative cataract inflammation. Originally available as a systemic medication, the product was removed from the market in the United States because of potentially fatal liver toxicity but has been available as an ophthalmic agent in Japan for several years. Nepafenac 0.1% is approved as a three times a day treatment for pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery. This agent is an arylacetic acid pro-drug. Flurbiprofen 0.03% and suprofen 1% are water-soluble phenylalkanoic acids approved by the FDA for intraoperative use during cataract surgery for inhibition of excessive miosis during cataract surgery. Ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% is also a water-soluble phenylalknaoic acid and is approved
The recently reported pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group studies of 313 patients with unilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) evaluated the safety and analgesic efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution in postoperative patients (Solomon). After surgery, patients were treated with 1 drop of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution (n = 156) or vehicle (n = 157) four times daily for up to 4 days. Pain intensity, pain relief, use of escape medication, and severity of ocular symptoms were assessed and adverse events, epithelial healing, and visual acuity recorded. Patients in the ketorolac group reported significantly less pain intensity than patients in the vehicle group (P<.001). During the first 12 hours post PRK, 50% fewer patients in the ketorolac group than in the vehicle group had severe to intolerable pain [41.6% (64/154) and 84.5% (131/ 155), respectively]. The median time to no pain was 30 hours in the ketorolac group and 54 hours in the vehicle group (P<.001). Ketorolac patients reported significantly greater pain relief than vehicle patients throughout the study (P<.001) and used significantly less escape medication than vehicle patients for 48 hours post-PRK (P<.008). The authors concluded that ketorolac 0.4% ophthalmic solution is safe and effective in reducing ocular pain when used 4 times daily for up to 4 days post-PRK.
NSAIDs vs Steroids
A recent study compared the efficacy, safety and patient comfort of two topical steroids (prednisolone 1% and rimexolone 1%) with ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after extracapsular cataract extraction in a prospective, randomized, double-masked study of 45 patients. Patients were assigned to receive topical treatment with prednisolone, rimexolone or ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution after phacoemulsification for cataract extraction. Although there were no significant between-group differences in inflammatory cell counts, (P=0.165), flare readings in the anterior chamber were lowest (P=0.008) in the ketorolac group. One patient in the prednisolone group experienced elevated IOP and had to be excluded. The authors concluded that ketorolac tromethamine provides good control of
238 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
||
|
intraocular inflammation after cataract extraction |
miosis during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
without the risk of a steroidal IOP increase (Herneiss). |
Mean horizontal pupillary diameter measurements for |
|
|
|
Holzer and associates reported that ketorolac |
both medications were similar at the start of surgery. |
|
|
|
tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% was is |
However, a consistent trend of larger pupillary |
|
|
|
effective as loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic |
diameter was seen in all subsequent surgical intervals |
|
|
|
suspension 0.5% in reducing inflammation after routine |
in the ketorolac-treated group. Changes from baseline |
|
|
|
phacoemulsi-fication and IOL implantation, suggesting |
measurements also indicated a more significant |
|
|
|
that ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% is a safe and |
inhibition of miosis at all subsequent intervals, and a |
|
|
||||
|
|
effective antiinflammatory alternative to steroids after |
more stable mydriasis throughout the procedure in |
|
|
|
cataract extraction. |
the ketorolac-treated group (Solomon 1997). |
|
|
|
Similarly, Solomon and associates reported |
|
|
|
|
ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% is a safe and effective |
NSAIDs and Topical Steroids |
|
|
|
anti-inflammatory alternative to steroids after cataract |
||
|
|
extraction. In that study, ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% |
It is well accepted that combination topical therapy |
|
|
|
was as effective as rimexolone 1% in reducing |
||
|
|
with a corticosteroid and a NSAID is more effective |
||
|
|
inflammation after cataract surgery. There were no |
||
|
|
than either agent dosed individually for treatment of |
||
|
|
between-group differences in signs and symptoms of |
||
|
|
CME following cataract surgery, and a recent study |
||
|
|
inflammation, intraocular pressure, or Kowa cell and |
||
|
|
by Rho and associates supports this paradigm. The |
||
|
|
flare measurements in this double-masked, prospective |
||
|
|
authors compared combination therapies of diclofenac |
||
|
|
evaluation of 36 patients (Solomon and Vroman |
||
|
|
sodium 0.1% and prednisolone acetate 1%, with |
||
|
2001). |
|
||
|
|
ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and prednisolone |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acetate 1%, for treatment of CME in 68 patients |
|
|
NSAIDs for the Inhibition of |
following uncomplicated cataract surgery. Complete |
|
|
|
resolution of CME was noted in 28% of diclofenac |
||
|
|
Miosis |
|
patients and in 25% of ketorolac patients. Final vision |
|
|
improved three or more lines in 58% and 53% of |
||
|
|
Srinivisin and associates reported that topical ketorolac |
||
|
|
patients, respectively. None of the patients showed signs |
||
|
|
was a more effective inhibitor of miosis than topical |
of corneal toxicity or significant intraocular pressure |
|
|
|
diclofenac during extracapsular cataract extraction and |
rise during the treatment period. The authors |
|
|
|
IOL implantation. Ketorolac also provided a more |
concluded that combination therapy with NSAIDs and |
|
|
|
stable mydriatic effect throughout surgery. In a study |
steroids was effective in reducing the severity of |
|
|
|
of 51 patients who were prospectively randomized to |
pseudophakic CME and in improving final vision. |
|
|
|
receive ketorolac 0.5% or diclofenac 0.1% at 3 |
The findings of Rho and associates are supported |
|
|
|
intervals preoperatively. In this study, the ketorolac |
by another recent study by Heier and associates (Heier, |
|
|
|
group showed a consistent trend toward larger pupil |
2000). That study evaluated the efficacy of ketorolac, |
|
|
|
diameters at subsequent surgical intervals as well as |
prednisolone acetate 1.0%, and ketorolac and |
|
|
|
greater inhibition of miosis in the ketorolac group. |
prednisolone combination therapy in the treatment |
|
|
|
Similarly, Snyder and associates reported that the |
of acute, visually significant, clinical CME following |
|
|
|
use of ketorolac as a single agent negated the need |
cataract extraction surgery in a randomized, double- |
|
|
|
for use of a combination of preoperative NSAID |
masked, prospective trial of 28 patients. Treatment was |
|
|
|
(flurbiprofen) and postoperative cosrticosteroid for the |
continued until CME resolved or for 3 months, |
|
|
|
prevention of intraoperative miosis and postoperative |
whichever occurred first and then tapered over 3 weeks. |
|
|
|
inflammation in cataract surgery. In their study of 26 |
The average improvements in Snellen visual acuity |
|
|
|
patients, there were no statistically significant differences |
were 1.6 lines with ketorolac monotherapy, 1.1 lines |
|
|
|
in dilation (preoperative versus postoperative) or cell |
with steroid monotherapy, and 3.8 lines with |
|
|
|
and flare postoperatively. The authors concluded that |
combination therapy. More patients in the combination |
|
|
|
the use of ketorolac as a single agent could eliminate |
group achieved at least a two-line improvement (89% |
|
|
|
the expense of using separate anti-inflammatory and |
of combination patients versus 67% of ketorolac and |
|
|
|
antimiotic preparations preoperatively and post- |
50% of steroid patients). Moreover, these patients |
|
|
|
operatively, thereby enhancing surgeon convenience |
improved faster with combination therapy than with |
|
|
|
and patient convenience and compliance (Snyder). |
monotherapy with either agent (1.33 months for |
|
|
|
Recently, a large study (n=118) compared the |
combination therapy compared with 1.43 months for |
|
|
|
effects of topical ketorolac with topical 0.03% |
ketorolac patients and 2.75 months for steroid |
|
|
|
flurbiprofen on the inhibition of surgically induced |
patients). Improvements in contrast sensitivity and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
|
239 |
||
leakage on fluorescein angiography tended to mirror |
concluded that macular edema decreases the quality |
|
||
improvements in Snellen acuity. The authors concluded |
of postoperative vision and that the use of pre- |
|
||
that treatment of acute, visually significant |
operative and postoperative NSAIDs decreases the |
|
||
pseudophakic CME with ketorolac and prednisolone |
amount of postoperative macular edema. |
|
||
combination therapy appears to offer benefits over |
Many clinicians are hesitant to prescribe topical |
|
||
monotherapy with either agent alone. |
NSAIDs for long-term use because of prior reports of |
|
||
A study by Arshinoff et al evaluated postoperative |
corneal melting associated with topical NSAIDs (Flach, |
|
||
pain in 97 PRK patients using different topical NSAID |
Gaynes). However, analysis of NSAID-associated |
|
||
|
||||
protocols. In their study, treatment with topical |
corneal events implicates the now defunct generic |
|
||
homatropine hydrobromide, either diclofenac sodium |
diclofenac product, diclofenac sodium ophthalmic |
|
||
or ketorolac tromethamine, and a soft contact lens |
solution as the agent primarily responsible (Gaynes). |
|
||
was most effective in achieving post-PRK analgesia. |
The demonstrated safety of ketorolac throughout |
|
||
They also found that NSAIDs added to topical steroid |
numerous studies, some as long as 6 weeks duration, |
|
||
protocols had a significantly greater effect than steroids |
suggests that this drug is safe for extended use. If fact |
|
||
alone on reducing myopic regression for one year |
ketorolac has actually been recommended for the |
|
||
postoperatively (Arshinoff, 1994). |
treatment of post-cataract inflammation in a patient |
|
||
|
|
with systemic steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis post- |
|
|
|
|
phacoemulsification. In this patient the fear of “melting” |
|
|
Prevention of CME |
|
led the physician to avoid topical NSAIDs. However, |
|
|
the severe reaction postoperatively led him to using |
|
|||
All available evidence demonstrates that ketorolac is |
|
|||
it successfully in the second eye with excellent results |
|
|||
an effective treatment for acute and chronic CME. |
(Caronia). |
|
||
Several studies, however, suggest that ketorolac is also |
The available evidence demonstrates that NSAIDs |
|
||
able to prevent CME in postoperative patients. A study |
are highly effective analgesics for pain associated with |
|
||
by Flach and associates (1990) suggested that ketorolac |
cataract and refractive procedures. The ability to |
|
||
prevents CME without the risks associated with |
provide relief of patient pain is critical because patients |
|
||
concomitant topical steroid treatment. In that study, |
have high expectations and expect almost no pain with |
|
||
50 patients with bilateral cataracts were enrolled in a |
ophthalmic surgeries. Patients who experience ocular |
|
||
placebo-controlled, paired-comparison, double- |
pain or discomfort may therefore believe that their |
|
||
masked study. Eleven patients had evidence of |
surgeon may have substandard surgical skills and the |
|
||
angiographic (angiographic aphakic CME) ACME on |
resulting patient dissatisfaction and potential for |
|
||
postoperative day 40. Two of these patients demons- |
negative word of mouth to the patient’s colleagues |
|
||
trated bilateral ACME, one patient had ACME in the |
and friends may have adverse consequences for a |
|
||
NSAID-treated eye, and eight patients had ACME in |
surgical practice. Choosing the most effective topical |
|
||
the placebo-treated eye. This was a statistically |
agent for relief of ocular inflammation and pain |
|
||
significant difference favoring drug treatment. In |
postoperatively is therefore. |
|
||
addition, the signs of anterior ocular inflammation were |
The adjunctive use of NSAIDs with steroids optimizes |
|
||
greater in the eyes with ACME. |
surgical outcomes as numerous studies have |
|
||
Roberts presented data from a clinical study at the |
demonstrated that the combination of an NSAID and |
|
||
2005 meeting of ASCRS that demonstrated that |
steroid is more effective for the treatment of post- |
|
||
patients using preoperative and postoperative NSAIDs |
operative inflammation, CME, and improving visual |
|
||
had less postoperative increase in macular thickness |
acuity than either NSAID or steroid monotherapy. |
|
||
than those who did not use NSAIDs. In that study, |
Perhaps the most important effect to surgeons is |
|
||
200 patients undergoing phacoemulsification were |
the increased amount of dilation preoperatively and |
|
||
randomized to two pharmaceutical treatment |
the tendency for the dilation to remain for the entire |
|
||
regimens, differing only by the inclusion/exclusion of |
procedure. Some surgeons have likened this effect as |
|
||
ketorolac 0.4% into the standard treatment regimen. |
like having a third hand during surgery. Other studies |
|
||
Outcome measures included macular thickness by OCT |
point out the direct relationship between pupil size and |
|
||
at preoperative and 4 weeks postoperative, contrast |
rate of surgical complications (Donnenfeld). |
|
||
sensitivity by FACT, and Snellen visual acuity. After 4 |
In recent years, there has been a substantially |
|
||
weeks, the change in macular thickness was |
amount of debate in the ophthalmic community |
|
||
substantially greater without NSAIDs than with |
regarding the use of NSAIDs prior to surgery to prevent |
|
||
(10.4 μm compared with 4.2 μm, respectively). There |
the formation of CME. We understand and accept that |
|
||
were no differences in visual acuity. The author |
increased inflammation postoperatively is associated |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|||
|
with an increased risk of developing CME. In fact, a |
2. |
Caronia RM, Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED, J Cataract and |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
study by Ursell and associates reported that patients |
|
Refractive Surg 2002;28:1880-81. |
|
|
|
who had angiographic CME at day 60 were more likely |
3. |
Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, Wittpenn JR, Solomon R, |
|
|
|
to have had more postoperative inflammation than |
|
Nattis A, Chou T. Preoperative ketorolac tromethamine |
|
|
|
|
0.4% in phacoemulsification outcomes: pharmacokinetic- |
||
|
|
patients who did not develop CME. (Ursell) It follows, |
|
||
|
|
|
response curve. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006 |
||
|
|
therefore, that preventing inflammation with pro- |
|
||
|
|
|
Sep;32(9):1474-82. |
||
|
|
phylactic dosing would decrease the risk of developing |
|
||
|
|
4. |
Evans RE, Bucci FA Jr, Amico LM. Efficacy of Ketorolac |
||
|
|
CME. A recent study by Donnenfeld and associates |
|
0.5% versus Ketorolac 0.4% Following Cataract Surgery. |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(Donnenfeld) does provide us with evidence |
|
Presented at ARVO 2005. |
|
|
|
supporting the use of ketorolac 0.4% as surgical |
5. |
Flach AJ, Stegman RC, Graham J, Kruger LP. Prophylaxis |
|
|
|
prophylaxis against CME. The study was a prospective |
|
of aphakic cystoid macular edema without corticosteroids. |
|
|
|
|
A paired-comparison, placebo-controlled double-masked |
||
|
|
evaluation of 100 patients randomized in a double- |
|
||
|
|
|
study. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1253-58. |
||
|
|
masked fashion prior to phacoemulsification into 4 |
|
||
|
|
6. |
Flach AJ. Corneal melts associated with topically applied |
||
|
|
groups: one group received preoperative ketorolac |
|||
|
|
|
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trans Am |
||
|
|
tromethamine 0.4% four times daily for 3 days and |
|
Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:205-10; discussion 210-12. |
|
|
|
three doses every 15 minutes immediately surgery, |
7. |
Gaynes BI, Fiscella R. Topical nonsteroidal anti- |
|
|
|
another received four doses on the day before surgery |
|
inflammatory drugs for ophthalmic use: a safety review. |
|
|
|
ketorolac 0.4% and three doses every 15 minutes |
8. |
Drug Saf. 2002;25:233-50. |
|
|
|
immediately surgery, another received ketorolac only |
Goyal R, Shankar J, Fone DL, Hughes DS. Randomized |
||
|
|
|
controlled trial of ketorolac in the management of corneal |
||
|
|
3 times (every 15 minutes) in the hour immediately |
|
||
|
|
|
abrasions. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001 Apr;79(2): |
||
|
|
surgery, and the fourth group was randomized to |
|
||
|
|
|
177-79. |
||
|
|
control. In that study, use of ketorolac for 1 or 3 days |
9. |
Guzek JP, Holm M, Cotter JB, et al. Risk factors for |
|
|
|
reduced the incidence of CME. No patients in these |
|
intraoperative complications in 1000 extracapsular |
|
|
|
groups had CME at week 2, compared with 12% (3/ |
|
cataract cases. Ophthalmology 1987;94:461-66. |
|
|
|
25) of control patients and 4% (1/25) of patients in |
10. |
Heier J, Cheetham JK, Degryse R, et al. Ketorolac |
|
|
|
the 1 hour group. This study suggests that three day |
|
tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution in the treatment |
|
|
|
|
of moderate to severe ocular inflammation after cataract |
||
|
|
preoperative dosing with ketorolac effectively prevents |
|
||
|
|
|
surgery: a randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. Am |
||
|
|
CME. Other findings of that study demonstrated that |
|
||
|
|
|
J Ophthalmol 1999;127:253-59. |
||
|
|
ketorolac maintained pupil size, reduced discomfort, |
11. |
Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Kampik A, Schonfeld CL. |
|
|
|
limited reductions in epithelial cell counts, and reduced |
|
Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and |
|
|
|
patient need for additional anesthesia. Ketorolac also |
|
ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction. A |
|
|
|
provided substantial reductions in the amount of time |
|
prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Graefes |
|
|
|
needed to perform surgery, making it a cost-effective |
|
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005 Mar 9; [Epub ahead |
|
|
|
|
of print]. |
||
|
|
pharmaceutical for cataract surgery. Most of these data |
|
||
|
|
12. |
Kaiser PK, Pineda R 2nd. A study of topical nonsteroidal |
||
|
|
followed a clear dose-response pattern, suggesting that |
|||
|
|
|
anti-inflammatory drops and no pressure patching in the |
||
|
|
maximum prophylaxis can be expected with the three |
|
||
|
|
|
treatment of corneal abrasions. Corneal Abrasion |
||
|
|
days dosing regimen, though even 1 day of ketorolac |
|
Patching Study Group. Ophthalmology 1997;104: |
|
|
|
was consistently superior to 1 hour of ketorolac or to |
|
1353-59. |
|
|
|
control. Flach and Roberts that ketorolac is an effective |
13. |
McColgin AZ, Heier JS. Control of intraocular |
|
|
|
prophylaxis against CME. |
|
inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Curr Opin |
|
|
|
|
Ophthalmol 2000;11(1):3-6. |
||
|
|
If a 3-day dosing regimen of ketorolac is effective |
|
||
|
|
14. |
Mentes J, Erakgun T, Afrashi F, Kerci G.Incidence of |
||
|
|
surgical prophylaxis, what is the most appropriate |
|||
|
|
|
cystoid macular edema after uncomplicated |
||
|
|
postoperative dosing regimen? In my experience, 4 |
|
||
|
|
|
phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica 2003 Nov- |
||
|
|
weeks of QID dosing with ketorolac 0.4% is optimal |
|
Dec;217(6):408-12. |
|
|
|
for most patients, in patients with diabetes mellitus we |
15. |
O'brien TP. Emerging guidelines for use of NSAID therapy |
|
|
|
use at least 6 weeks of therapy and most important |
|
to optimize cataract surgery patient care. Curr Med Res |
|
|
|
in patients with diabetic retinopathy we use ketorolac |
16. |
Opin 2005 Jul;21(7):1131-38. |
|
|
|
0.4% for at least three months to help protect this |
Polansky JR, Weinreb RN. Steroids as anti-inflammatory |
||
|
|
|
agents. In: Sears ML, ed. Pharmacology of the Eye. New |
||
|
|
most susceptible group from developing CME. |
|
||
|
|
|
York, NY: Springer-Verlag 1984;460-538. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bibliography |
17. |
Price FW Jr, Price MO, Zeh W, Dobbins K. Pain reduction |
|
|
|
|
after laser in situ keratomileusis with ketorolac |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5%: a randomized, |
|
|
1. Arshinoff S, D'Addario D, Sadler C, Bilotta R, Johnson |
|
||
|
|
|
double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. J Refract Surg. |
||
|
|
TM. Use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs |
|
2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):140-44. |
|
|
|
in excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract |
18. |
Price FW, Tonon E, VanDenburgh AM, Stern K, |
|
|
|
Refract Surg. 1994;20:216-22. |
|
Cheetham JK, Schiffman RM. Safety and Efficacy of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery |
|
|
241 |
||||
Reformulated Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% Ophthalmic |
antimiotic and anti-inflammatory in cataract surgery. J |
|
|||||
Solution in Post-Photorefractive Keratectomy Patients. |
Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1225-27. |
|
|
|
|||
Presented at ARVO 2003. |
|
|
31. Snyder RW, Siekert RW, Schwiegerling J, Donnenfeld E, |
|
|||
19. Price MO, Price FW. Efficacy of topical ketorolac |
Thompson P. Acular as a single agent for use as an |
|
|||||
tromethamine 0.4% for control of pain or discomfort |
antimiotic and anti-inflammatory in cataract surgery. J |
|
|||||
associated with cataract surgery. Curr Med Res Opin 2004 |
Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1225-27. |
|
|
|
|||
Dec;20(12):2015-19. |
|
|
32. Solomon KD, Donnenfeld ED, Raizman M, et al. Safety |
|
|||
20. Quinn CJ. Cystoid macular edema. Optom Clin |
and efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic |
|
|||||
1996;5(1):111-30. |
|
|
solution in post-photorefractive keratectomy patients. J |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
21. Ray S. D'Amico DJ. Pseudophakic macular edema. |
Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1653-60. |
|
|||||
Semin Ophthalmol 2002;17:167-80. |
|
33. Solomon KD, Donnenfeld ED, Raizman M, et al. Safety |
|
||||
22. Rho DS, Soll SM. Combination Therapy for |
and efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic |
|
|||||
Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema: Diclofenac |
solution in post-photorefractive keratectomy patients. J |
|
|||||
Sodium 0.1% and Prednisolone Acetate 1% Versus |
Cataract Refract Surg 2004 Aug;30(8):1653-60. |
|
|||||
Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5% and Prednisolone Acetate |
34. Solomon KD, Turkalj JW, Whiteside SB, Stewart JA, |
|
|||||
1%. Presented at ARVO 2004. |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Apple DJ. Topical 0.5% ketorolac vs 0.03% flurbiprofen |
|
||||
23. Rho DS. Treatment of acute pseudophakic cystoid |
|
||||||
for inhibition of miosis during cataract surgery. Arch |
|
||||||
macular edema: Diclofenac versus ketorolac. J Cataract |
|
||||||
Ophthalmol 1997 Sep;115(9):1119-22. |
|
|
|
||||
Refract Surg 2003 Dec;29(12):2378-84. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
35. Solomon KD, Turkalj JW, Whiteside SB, Stewart JA, |
|
|||||
24. Roberts CW. Comparison of the Ocular Comfort of Acular |
|
||||||
Apple DJ. Topical 0.5% ketorolac vs 0.03% flurbiprofen |
|
||||||
LS with Acular PF in Healthy Volunteers. Presented at |
|
||||||
for inhibition of miosis during cataract surgery. Arch |
|
||||||
ARVO 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
Ophthalmol 1997;115:1119-22. |
|
|
|
|
25. Roberts CW. Pretreatment with topical diclofenac sodium |
|
|
|
||||
36. Solomon KD, Vroman DT, Barker D, Gehlken J. |
|
||||||
to decrease postoperative inflammation. Ophthalmology |
|
||||||
Comparison of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and |
|
||||||
1996;103:636-39. |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
rimexolone 1% to control inflammation after cataract |
|
||||
26. Rossetti L, Autelitano A. Cystoid macular edema |
|
||||||
extraction. Prospective randomized double-masked |
|
||||||
following cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol |
|
||||||
study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001 Aug;27(8):1232-37. |
|
||||||
2000;11:65-72. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
37. Srinivasan R, Madhavaranga. Topical |
ketorolac |
|
||
27. Sandoval HP, Fernandez de Castro LE, Vroman DT, |
|
||||||
tromethamine 0.5% versus diclofenac sodium 0.1% to |
|
||||||
Solomon KD. |
Comparison |
of 0.4% |
Ketorolac |
|
|||
inhibit miosis during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract |
|
||||||
Tromethamine Ophthalmic Solution vs 0.5% Ketorolac |
|
||||||
Surg 2002 Mar;28(3):517-20. |
|
|
|
||||
Tromethamine |
Ophthalmic |
Solution |
to Prevent |
|
|
|
|
38. Stewart R, Grosserode R, Cheetham JK, et al. Efficacy and |
|
||||||
Inflammation After Phacoemulsification and Intraocular |
|
||||||
safety profile of ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution in |
|
||||||
Lens Implantation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double- |
|
||||||
the prevention of surgically induced miosis during |
|
||||||
Masked, Clinical Trial. Presented at ARVO 2005. |
|
||||||
cataract surgery. Clin Ther 1999;21:723-32. |
|
|
|
||||
28. Schechter BA, Wittpenn JR. Evaluation of Ketorolac |
|
|
|
||||
39. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB. |
|
||||||
(Acular LS) During the Induction Phase of Cyclosporine |
|
||||||
a (Restasis) Therapy to Improve Patient Comfort. |
Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: |
|
|||||
Presented at ARVO 2005. |
|
|
relationship to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual |
|
|||
29. Singal N, Hopkins J. Pseudophakic cystoid macular |
acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999 Nov;25(11): |
|
|||||
edema: ketorolac alone vs. ketorolac plus prednisolone. |
1492-97. |
|
|
|
|||
Can J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;39(3):245-50. |
40. Waterbury LD, Flach AJ. Efficacy of low concentrations |
|
|||||
30. Snyder RW, Siekert RW, Schwiegerling J, Donnenfeld E, |
of ketorolac tromethamine in animal models of ocular |
|
|||||
Thompson P. Acular as a single agent for use as an |
inflammation. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:345-52. |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C H A P T E R
38Management of Cystoid
Macular Edema
Arturo Pérez-Arteaga, René Cano-Hidalgo (Mexico)
Introduction
Cystoid macular edema (CME) is an inflammatory condition of the central retina that can be produced for many causes, since drugs for other ophthalmic diseases until surgical intervention of the eye. If well the initial descriptions of the disease can be found as a surgical complication, now we know much more conditions that can produce these clinical and paraclinical findings, so that we can talk about a multifactorial disease.
Many drugs are involved in the treatment of this condition. The choose of each one is according the etiology of the inflammatory process, preference of the physician, response of the patient, underlying disease, severity of visual loss and anatomic findings. Even surgical treatment has been described, and so the use of specifical drugs during and after the procedure; so it is a very good way to review the drugs involved in the treatment of this pathologic condition according to the physioscopy of this book, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs in ophthalmology. In fact several proven treatment modalities are available and so on new therapies are continuing to expand our horizons.
First the reader will find in this chapter a brief description of CME definition, etiology, clinical findings and diagnostic strategies. Then the drugs that are involved in the treatment of this condition, including those used in the surgical treatment will be described.
Definition
CME is a pathologic condition of the macula with swelling where multiple cyst-like (cystoid) areas of fluid appear in the central retina, mostly in the outer plexiform layer. It is a painless disorder that according to the cause and severity can be fully reversed or can cause permanent visual loss. Sometimes this condition has clinical manifestations from low to severe, but also can occur in the sub-clinic plane.
Etiology
POST-SURGICAL, PRIMARY OR SECONDARY (CAPSULOTOMY)
It was first described as the Irving-Gass syndrome; a pathologic condition where Irving in 1953 mentioned a decrease in the visual acuity with vitreoretinal alterations after the intracapsular surgery of the lens, and Gass and Norton described the typical fluorangiographic changes of this condition. At that time 77% of the eyes operated with intracapsular cataract surgery developed some degree of CME, even sometimes subclinical.
During the days of the extracapsular cataract extraction the incidence decreased because the preservation of the posterior capsule and the decrease of vitreous loss. Even so, this incidence increase when there is posterior capsule rupture in an extracapsular technique. With the entrance of phacoemulsification techniques for cataract surgery the incidence was even less, but again, it was demostrated that the main goal to decrease this condition is the conservation of the posterior capsule and to avoid the vitreous loss. It is still to be proved that the newest technologies of minimally invasive cataract surgery can produce a statistical reduction of post-cataract surgery CME.
The posterior capsulotomy is also a very well-known procedure that can lead to CME, and it is also related to the rupture of the retinal and accuous barriers; so in this field new technologies and evolution of intraocular lenses that can reduce the incidence of posterior capsule opacification are very important.
Any kind of intraocular surgery can produce sometime some degree of CME. At the end the cascade of events become from the rupture of the intraocular barriers. The initial trauma (damage, surgery, etc.) produce the liberation of the chemical mediators of the inflammation to the accuous and vitreous; mainly prostaglandins are produced by the damaged tissue and the traumatized epithelial cells, but many other
Management of Cystoid Macular Edema |
|
|
243 |
|
factors like the complement, the platelet activation |
of risk factors like cataract surgery, uveitis, posterior |
|
||
factor, lisozomal enzymes, cytoquines, nitric oxide, |
capsulotomy and diabetic retinopathy. |
|
|
|
endothelin and interleukin. We can conclude that any |
This concepts must be taken in count by the |
|
||
factor that contributes to the rupture of the barriers |
physician at the time to prescribe this medications in |
|
||
blood-accuous and blood-retinal is going to increase |
particular if some risk factors are present in some patient. |
|
||
the possibility to develope CME. |
If the therapy can be done with another medication |
|
||
|
it will be better, but if it must be continued for some |
|
||
MICROVASCULAR DAMAGE |
reason, the utilization of non-steroidal |
anti- |
|
|
|
||||
This is commonly found in diabetic retinopathy, |
inflammatory drugs can avoid the development of |
|
||
CME without loss of the hypotensor effect of the anti- |
|
|||
occlusive diseases like retinal vein occlusions, and other |
|
|||
glaucoma drugs. Also a constant follow-up with the |
|
|||
less commonly diseases like idiopathic juxtafoveal |
|
|||
explanation to the patient of specific symptoms of |
|
|||
capillary telangiectasia. The main factor is again the |
|
|||
macular disease and Amsler test in each visit for |
|
|||
rupture of the intraocular barriers that this vascular |
|
|||
glaucoma control, are mandatory. |
|
|
|
|
alterations produce and the liberation of the mentioned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mediators during the acute vascular event. Some other |
PERIPHERAL RETINAL LESIONS |
|
|
|
factors like the VEGF and IGF-1 liberated by the |
|
|
|
|
ischemic tissues, have been involved in the rupture |
A peripheral lesion, can lead by itself, to the rupture |
|
||
of the intraocular barriers and so in the production |
of the intraocular barriers and so the development of |
|
||
of CME. Any syndrome associated with sub-retinal |
CME. It is a good behavior to explorate the periphery |
|
||
neovascularization can have the same effect. |
of the retina in a case when we find CME and we |
|
||
|
are trying to know the cause. |
|
|
|
INFLAMMATORY DISEASES |
TUMORAL DISEASES |
|
|
|
The most well-known form of uveitis that can produce |
|
|
|
|
CME is pars planitis; in fact CME is the main cause |
Because of acummulation of leakage and rupture of |
|
||
of visual loss in this inflammatory process, but many |
the barriers, many ocular tumors, like malignant |
|
||
other forms of uveitis like Behçet´s disease, Crohn´s |
melanomas, peripheral capillary hemangiomas and |
|
||
disease, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis and some |
Coat´s disease can be also cause of CME. |
|
|
|
other forms of non-specifical uveitis can produce some |
|
|
|
|
degree of CME. The cause is as mentioned before, |
EYE HYPOTONY |
|
|
|
the liberation of the inflammatory mediators. |
It can be post-traumatic, with or without rupture of |
|
||
|
|
|||
POST-MEDICATION (ANTIGLAUCOMA DRUGS |
the globe, it can be followed cataract surgery, glaucoma |
|
||
procedures or choroidal effussions of any cause. At |
|
|||
AND PRESERVATIVES) |
|
|||
the end, the low intraocular pressure is the cause for |
|
|||
The first reference about the relation between an anti- |
|
|||
the rupture of the intraocular barriers and so the |
|
|||
glaucoma medication and the development of CME |
liberation of mediators. |
|
|
|
was described by Becker in 1967 and was with the |
|
|
|
|
use of epinephrine; was noted years after, that this |
OPTIC NERVE DISEASES |
|
|
|
incidence was more in the aphakic patient. It is well |
|
|
|
|
Optic nerve inflammations like true papilledema, |
|
|||
known at this time, that the topical epinephrine |
|
|||
neuropathy or some ischemic diseases can produce |
|
|||
increase the prostaglandins in the eye, in particular |
|
|||
CME. |
|
|
|
|
in the aphakic one, and so the rupture of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
intraocular barriers. |
RETINAL TRACTION |
|
|
|
Some other medications were described to |
|
|
|
|
produce this effect like dipivalylepinephrine, timolol |
Peripheral traction, macular traction, epiretinal |
|
||
and benzalconium chloride. Recently with the arise of |
membranes, and traction produced by diabetic |
|
||
new pharmacologic groups of anti-glaucomatous |
retinopathy (even without direct macular traction) are |
|
||
medication, in particular prostaglandins, the incidence |
common entities that can produce CME. |
|
|
|
of post-medication CME has increase. A lot of studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
have been conducted in this field and what we know |
FINAL COMMON PATHWAY OF UNDERLYING |
|
||
currently is that latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost |
|
|||
DISEASES |
|
|
|
|
and unoprostone can produce some degree of CME |
|
|
|
|
Ischemic, tractional, inflammatory, toxic and genetic. |
|
|||
and that this incidence can increase with the association |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
Histopathology |
poor visuality like 20/400 or less in severe cases. Like |
|
|
|
||
|
|
some others macular diseases the patients can |
|
|
|
The breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier due |
|
|
|
experience some degree of metamorphopsia. |
|
|
|
to vasogenic and/or cytotoxic causes is the initial event |
At the clinical examination the evidence of surgery, |
|
|
in CME. There is a leaking of the perifoveal capillaries |
trauma, vascular retinal diseases and others like |
|
|
leading the formation of edema. The fluid collects in |
glaucoma diseases must be achieved. Of course the |
|
|
the loosely arranged outer plexiform layer of Henle; |
main study is the fundoscopy where the macular |
|
|
in this layer the fibers are arranged in an horizontal |
thickening and/or swelling can be found. It also can |
|
|||
|
|
pattern. This is the cause of the petalloid flower |
be found in many degrees depending upon the severity |
|
|
appearance that is seen as characteristic of this disease |
of the disease, and can go since a loss of foveolar reflex |
|
|
in the angiogram (cystic pattern) (Fig. 38.1). |
with out clinical evidence of edema, to a characteristic |
|
|
Electronic microscopy has shown acummulation of |
cystic appearance. This is the typical clinical finding in |
|
|
intracelullar fluid within expanded Müller cell processes. |
the ophthalmoscopy, radiating cystic spaces emana- |
|
|
|
ting from the macula. Of course, in these cases, there |
|
|
|
is a complete loss of the red reflex. The red free light |
|
|
|
examination is mandatory, where a “honeycombed” |
|
|
|
appearance is seen, and it corresponds to the fluid |
|
|
|
filled cyst (Fig. 38.2). In severe cases these cyst may |
|
|
|
coalesce into a macular cyst and then form a hole. |
Fig. 38.1: Cystic pattern
Clinical Findings
There is always an history of previous ocular disease, surgery, medication, vitreous pathology or another condition in the patient that developes CME. Sometimes it can be very easy to obtain, like previous cataract surgey or posterior capsulotomy, but in some others, the physician must be very accurate like in glaucoma medications, posterior vitreous detachment or peripheral tears that may lead to the break of the inner blood-retinal barrier.
The main symptom of CME is the reduction of visual acuity, even so, here are many forms of CME that goes free of visual symptoms. Many patients that undergo a cataract surgery can develop some degree of sub-clinical CME, and the only one evidence can be found in a retinal fluorogram. The degree of the disease and so the severity of symptoms frequently correlates with the degree of complications during the cataract surgery, if this is the case. So the reduction of visual acuity may undergo from a minimal degree, like 20/25 and be not notice by the patient, until very
Fig. 38.2: Loss of red reflex
PARACLINICALAPPROACH
No laboratory studies are necessary to establish the diagnosis of CME. The main study in the establishment of this diagnosis is the fluorescein angiogram (FA).
In the FA parafoveal retinal capillary leakage is seen in the early and mid phases. These phases are not characteristic of CME because the acummulation of fluid in certain conditions is delayed, so the late phase has a particular importance, and it is about 20 minutes and sometimes can be more, to find the characteristic petaloid pattern of leakage in the macula.
Another related conditions can be seen in the FA according the underlying disease: If likeage microaneurysms are present, diabetic retinopathy can be the cause; vascular collaterals can be due to retinal oclussion; optic nerve findings are also useful in the final etiologic diagnosis establishment.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive method also very useful in the final diagnosis
Management of Cystoid Macular Edema |
|
|
245 |
|||
of CME because the fluid-filled spaces in the retina |
NON-SURGICALAPPROACH |
|
|
|
||
are easily seen. This cross-sectional image of the retina |
Many drugs have been involved for the treatment of |
|
||||
can also be helpful in the monitoring over time of the |
|
|||||
CME during the time. Some of them are used as a |
|
|||||
disease by quantifying the amount of fluid inside the |
|
|||||
traditional fashion and some others are emerging as |
|
|||||
retina in serial studies. A non-invasive study can be |
|
|||||
new therapeutic resources. |
|
|
|
|||
the ideal modality in monitoring the response to |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
treatment. |
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) |
|
||||
In particular cases an electroretinogram can also |
|
|||||
The main effect of this group of drugs is to estabilize |
|
|||||
be helpful but not mandatory (Figs 38.3 to 38.5). |
|
|||||
|
|
the blood-retinal barrier. This effect is because they |
|
|||
|
|
inhibit the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase. They can be used |
|
|||
|
|
by systemic way and also in the form of eyedrops. |
|
|||
|
|
The main examples of this group of medications are: |
|
|||
|
|
1. |
Indomethacin |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Ketorolac |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Diclofenac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
They inhibite the prostaglandin synthesis by |
|
||
|
|
decreasing the activity of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase. |
|
|||
|
|
These drugs in the topical form must be used as a |
|
|||
|
|
medication in the preoperative and postoperative |
|
|||
|
|
period of some intraocular procedures like cataract |
|
|||
Fig. 38.3: Macular quistic edema |
surgery, posterior capsulotomy and peripheral |
|
||||
iridectomy for example, to reduce the incidence of |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
CME. This profilactic form also helps to reduce the |
|
|||
|
|
postoperative inflammatory process. As has been said |
|
|||
|
|
before, the development of CME in some way |
|
|||
|
|
correlates with the degree of manipulation during the |
|
|||
|
|
ocular surgery and some factors have been |
|
|||
|
|
demonstrated in the development of CME like the |
|
|||
|
|
time of light microscope exposure, posterior capsule |
|
|||
|
|
rupture and vitreous manipulation. Of course, a real |
|
|||
|
|
“clean” surgery can decrease the incidence of CME, |
|
|||
|
|
but anyway, the use of NSAIDs |
is mandatory. New |
|
||
|
|
operative devices that avoid the use of direct light |
|
|||
Fig. 38.4: CME plus epiretinal membrane |
exposure during the ocular surgery are promising in |
|
||||
the near future to decrease the incidence of CME in |
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
uncomplicated surgery cases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The use of systemic NSAIDs is only reserve for the |
|
||
|
|
cases of complete diagnosis of CME; even so some |
|
|||
|
|
surgeons are using them as a profilactic medication. |
|
|||
|
|
There is not a recomended time for the use of systemic |
|
|||
|
|
NSAIDs for the treatment of CME; the time of use |
|
|||
|
|
will depend upon the response of each patient in |
|
|||
|
|
particular according the follow-up. |
|
|||
|
|
|
Because sometimes it is a long-term medication, |
|
||
|
|
secondary effects of NSAIDs must be always taken in |
|
|||
|
|
count. In the systemic medication, gastric effects should |
|
|||
Fig. 38.5: Epiretinal membrane plus macular cystic edema |
be monitoring during the visits of the patient. A history |
|
||||
of gastric diseases including ulcerative disease and |
|
|||||
|
|
bleeding is mandatory when oral indomethacin is in |
|
|||
Treatment |
|
use. If some of these effects are present the |
|
|||
|
therapeutic must be suspended and replaced by other |
|
||||
The treatment of CME can be divided in two |
medication. |
|
|
|
||
approaches that finally in the practice are combined |
|
Local NSAIDs have also some secondary effects; |
|
|||
but in the theory we are going to describe separately. |
long-term use may delay wound healing and has been |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma |
|
|
reported cases of corneal stromal thinning or melting |
of the blood-ocular barrier. They can be useful in some |
|
|
|
||
|
|
in some particular patients receiving diclophenac |
forms of uveitic CME. Nevertheless the secondary |
|
|
eyedrops for extended period of time. If symptoms |
effects of systemic corticoid medication must be |
|
|
like blurred or diminished vision and signs of corneal |
avoided, and this is why recently the medication of |
|
|
deposits, retinal changes and scotoma are present, the |
CME is trying to move to the ocular space instead the |
|
|
medication must be suspended. |
systemic route. |
|
|
Corticosteroids |
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (CAIs) |
|
|||
Steroidal medication is very useful in the treatment of CME and also in the prevention of it. The routine use of steroids in the eyedrops form before and after surgical procedures, has decrease the incidence of postsurgical CME, even in complicated cases.
The most frequent form of steroid medication for CME is topical, in the form of prednisolone acetate; it is indicated in several conditions of steroid-responsive intraocular inflammation. The presentation is at 1% solution and can be used several times in a day according the severity of the inflammation. The amount and time of administration must be measured according the response of the disease to the treatment. Monitoring of the side effects of topical steroids like, raise in the intraocular pressure and an increased risk of secondary ocular infections, must be evaluating during the time of therapy and this should be discontinued if some of these effects are found. Not all patients have the same response to steroids according the rise in the intraocular pressure; some patients can tolerate large periods of time without changes in the pressure, but some others cannot tolerate too much medication. If the topical steroid therapy is really needed in these cases, the physician can add some glaucoma therapy; medications that can increase the CME should be avoided (e.g. latanoprost, travoprost, epinephrine); the best adjunctive antiglaucoma medication is dorsolamide that also can have some benefit effects in the macula. Other side effects of long-term topical steroids like subcapsular cataract formation must be addressed.
The use of injections of long acting depot-steroids (e.g. triamcinolone) into the sub-Tenon space has also a role in the treatment of CME. This external way of administration that can have more penetration to the retina; the drug delivery to the retina is superior by this route in comparison to peribulbar. In some cases of uveitic CME refractory to conventional treatment, the triamcinolone has been used in intravitreous injection alone or in combination with some other drugs. Triamcinolone alone has been effectively in reducing CME and improving vision; some studies are currently underway in the combination of this steroidal drug with other drugs, like bevacizumab (Avastin).
Oral steroids play also an important role in the treatment of CME because the effect in the stabilization
Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme present in the apical and basal surfaces of the retinal pigment epithelium cell membrane. Its action is to pump and produce a change in the ion flux. CAIs enhance this pumping action of these cells, and helps to improve this ion flux that affects the cellular environment of the retina.
CAIs are commonly used in ophthalmology, in particular in the glaucoma cases, where the topical medication is not enough to control the intraocular pressure, so it is a well-known resource. Also the physician is close to side effects of the CAIs, like the alteration in the ionic composition of blood, increase in urine excretion, and in large doses hepatic and metabolic problems. So it is known that it is not a chronic medication, it has to be used according the severity and response to treatment of CME and the physician has to advice the patient the side effects, the mode to contrarest them and the total communication they both have to mantain in order to manage the dose in good response, but also in good levels of side effects. This medication should be suspended as soon as possible according the evolution of CME.
The presentation of acetazolamide is in tablets of 250 mg and can be given until three to four times a day. Close monitoring of antiinflammatory and side effects is mandatory.
Intravitreal Medication
Recently new drugs are appearing in the retinal medication field for intravitreal injection, like Bevacizumab (Avastin) and Pegaptinib, also called Macugen. These drugs are promising results in many retinal vascular disorders like occlusive diseases and diabetic retinopathy. The side effects are not completely known, and many trials around the world are in progress at this time to achieve consistent results.
The apparently positive action seen in some vascular disorders lead the possibility to use them in CME. Some of them are including only diabetic patients, some others only postoperative cataract patients and some others are combining the avastin with triamcinolone. During the middle of year 2007 these trials will be finish and we will be able to know the safety, efficacy and probably side effects of these drugs in the treatment of CME.
