Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Clinical Diagnosis and Management of ocular trauma

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.49 Mб
Скачать

Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery

237

for the treatment of for the reduction of ocular pain and burning/stinging following corneal refractive surgery.

NSAIDs for Control of Pain

Following PRK

Fig. 27.3: Preoperative NSAIDs reduce pupil constriction during cataract surgery (Donnenfeld)

to microbial infections due to a suppressed host immune-response, retardation in corneal epithelial and stromal wound healing. Steroids are not safe for periods of extended use as prolonged use is associated with development of glaucoma, visual acuity defects and loss of visual field, and posterior subcapsular cataract formation.

A safer alternative to corticosteroids for the treatment of ocular inflammation are the NSAIDs. There are four classes of NSAIDS available for topical ophthalmic use: indoles, phenylacetic acids, an arylacetic acid pro-drug, and phenylalkanoic acids. Indomethacin 1% aqueous suspension is an indole derivative that is available outside of the United States (O’Brien). Diclofenac 1% is a water-soluble phenylacetic derivative approved by the FDA as a treatment to minimize inflammation related to cataract surgery and as a therapeutic option for the reduction of pain and photophobia after cataract surgery. Bromfenac 0.09% is a recently approved twice-daily topical phenylacetic compound indicated for the treatment of postoperative cataract inflammation. Originally available as a systemic medication, the product was removed from the market in the United States because of potentially fatal liver toxicity but has been available as an ophthalmic agent in Japan for several years. Nepafenac 0.1% is approved as a three times a day treatment for pain and inflammation associated with cataract surgery. This agent is an arylacetic acid pro-drug. Flurbiprofen 0.03% and suprofen 1% are water-soluble phenylalkanoic acids approved by the FDA for intraoperative use during cataract surgery for inhibition of excessive miosis during cataract surgery. Ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% is also a water-soluble phenylalknaoic acid and is approved

The recently reported pooled analysis of 2 multicenter, randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group studies of 313 patients with unilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) evaluated the safety and analgesic efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution in postoperative patients (Solomon). After surgery, patients were treated with 1 drop of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic solution (n = 156) or vehicle (n = 157) four times daily for up to 4 days. Pain intensity, pain relief, use of escape medication, and severity of ocular symptoms were assessed and adverse events, epithelial healing, and visual acuity recorded. Patients in the ketorolac group reported significantly less pain intensity than patients in the vehicle group (P<.001). During the first 12 hours post PRK, 50% fewer patients in the ketorolac group than in the vehicle group had severe to intolerable pain [41.6% (64/154) and 84.5% (131/ 155), respectively]. The median time to no pain was 30 hours in the ketorolac group and 54 hours in the vehicle group (P<.001). Ketorolac patients reported significantly greater pain relief than vehicle patients throughout the study (P<.001) and used significantly less escape medication than vehicle patients for 48 hours post-PRK (P<.008). The authors concluded that ketorolac 0.4% ophthalmic solution is safe and effective in reducing ocular pain when used 4 times daily for up to 4 days post-PRK.

NSAIDs vs Steroids

A recent study compared the efficacy, safety and patient comfort of two topical steroids (prednisolone 1% and rimexolone 1%) with ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after extracapsular cataract extraction in a prospective, randomized, double-masked study of 45 patients. Patients were assigned to receive topical treatment with prednisolone, rimexolone or ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic solution after phacoemulsification for cataract extraction. Although there were no significant between-group differences in inflammatory cell counts, (P=0.165), flare readings in the anterior chamber were lowest (P=0.008) in the ketorolac group. One patient in the prednisolone group experienced elevated IOP and had to be excluded. The authors concluded that ketorolac tromethamine provides good control of

238

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

intraocular inflammation after cataract extraction

miosis during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

 

 

 

 

without the risk of a steroidal IOP increase (Herneiss).

Mean horizontal pupillary diameter measurements for

 

 

Holzer and associates reported that ketorolac

both medications were similar at the start of surgery.

 

 

tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5% was is

However, a consistent trend of larger pupillary

 

 

effective as loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic

diameter was seen in all subsequent surgical intervals

 

 

suspension 0.5% in reducing inflammation after routine

in the ketorolac-treated group. Changes from baseline

 

 

phacoemulsi-fication and IOL implantation, suggesting

measurements also indicated a more significant

 

 

that ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% is a safe and

inhibition of miosis at all subsequent intervals, and a

 

 

 

effective antiinflammatory alternative to steroids after

more stable mydriasis throughout the procedure in

 

 

cataract extraction.

the ketorolac-treated group (Solomon 1997).

 

 

Similarly, Solomon and associates reported

 

 

 

ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% is a safe and effective

NSAIDs and Topical Steroids

 

 

anti-inflammatory alternative to steroids after cataract

 

 

extraction. In that study, ketorolac tromethamine 0.5%

It is well accepted that combination topical therapy

 

 

was as effective as rimexolone 1% in reducing

 

 

with a corticosteroid and a NSAID is more effective

 

 

inflammation after cataract surgery. There were no

 

 

than either agent dosed individually for treatment of

 

 

between-group differences in signs and symptoms of

 

 

CME following cataract surgery, and a recent study

 

 

inflammation, intraocular pressure, or Kowa cell and

 

 

by Rho and associates supports this paradigm. The

 

 

flare measurements in this double-masked, prospective

 

 

authors compared combination therapies of diclofenac

 

 

evaluation of 36 patients (Solomon and Vroman

 

 

sodium 0.1% and prednisolone acetate 1%, with

 

2001).

 

 

 

ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and prednisolone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

acetate 1%, for treatment of CME in 68 patients

 

 

NSAIDs for the Inhibition of

following uncomplicated cataract surgery. Complete

 

 

resolution of CME was noted in 28% of diclofenac

 

 

Miosis

 

patients and in 25% of ketorolac patients. Final vision

 

 

improved three or more lines in 58% and 53% of

 

 

Srinivisin and associates reported that topical ketorolac

 

 

patients, respectively. None of the patients showed signs

 

 

was a more effective inhibitor of miosis than topical

of corneal toxicity or significant intraocular pressure

 

 

diclofenac during extracapsular cataract extraction and

rise during the treatment period. The authors

 

 

IOL implantation. Ketorolac also provided a more

concluded that combination therapy with NSAIDs and

 

 

stable mydriatic effect throughout surgery. In a study

steroids was effective in reducing the severity of

 

 

of 51 patients who were prospectively randomized to

pseudophakic CME and in improving final vision.

 

 

receive ketorolac 0.5% or diclofenac 0.1% at 3

The findings of Rho and associates are supported

 

 

intervals preoperatively. In this study, the ketorolac

by another recent study by Heier and associates (Heier,

 

 

group showed a consistent trend toward larger pupil

2000). That study evaluated the efficacy of ketorolac,

 

 

diameters at subsequent surgical intervals as well as

prednisolone acetate 1.0%, and ketorolac and

 

 

greater inhibition of miosis in the ketorolac group.

prednisolone combination therapy in the treatment

 

 

Similarly, Snyder and associates reported that the

of acute, visually significant, clinical CME following

 

 

use of ketorolac as a single agent negated the need

cataract extraction surgery in a randomized, double-

 

 

for use of a combination of preoperative NSAID

masked, prospective trial of 28 patients. Treatment was

 

 

(flurbiprofen) and postoperative cosrticosteroid for the

continued until CME resolved or for 3 months,

 

 

prevention of intraoperative miosis and postoperative

whichever occurred first and then tapered over 3 weeks.

 

 

inflammation in cataract surgery. In their study of 26

The average improvements in Snellen visual acuity

 

 

patients, there were no statistically significant differences

were 1.6 lines with ketorolac monotherapy, 1.1 lines

 

 

in dilation (preoperative versus postoperative) or cell

with steroid monotherapy, and 3.8 lines with

 

 

and flare postoperatively. The authors concluded that

combination therapy. More patients in the combination

 

 

the use of ketorolac as a single agent could eliminate

group achieved at least a two-line improvement (89%

 

 

the expense of using separate anti-inflammatory and

of combination patients versus 67% of ketorolac and

 

 

antimiotic preparations preoperatively and post-

50% of steroid patients). Moreover, these patients

 

 

operatively, thereby enhancing surgeon convenience

improved faster with combination therapy than with

 

 

and patient convenience and compliance (Snyder).

monotherapy with either agent (1.33 months for

 

 

Recently, a large study (n=118) compared the

combination therapy compared with 1.43 months for

 

 

effects of topical ketorolac with topical 0.03%

ketorolac patients and 2.75 months for steroid

 

 

flurbiprofen on the inhibition of surgically induced

patients). Improvements in contrast sensitivity and

 

 

 

 

 

Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery

 

239

leakage on fluorescein angiography tended to mirror

concluded that macular edema decreases the quality

 

improvements in Snellen acuity. The authors concluded

of postoperative vision and that the use of pre-

 

that treatment of acute, visually significant

operative and postoperative NSAIDs decreases the

 

pseudophakic CME with ketorolac and prednisolone

amount of postoperative macular edema.

 

combination therapy appears to offer benefits over

Many clinicians are hesitant to prescribe topical

 

monotherapy with either agent alone.

NSAIDs for long-term use because of prior reports of

 

A study by Arshinoff et al evaluated postoperative

corneal melting associated with topical NSAIDs (Flach,

 

pain in 97 PRK patients using different topical NSAID

Gaynes). However, analysis of NSAID-associated

 

 

protocols. In their study, treatment with topical

corneal events implicates the now defunct generic

 

homatropine hydrobromide, either diclofenac sodium

diclofenac product, diclofenac sodium ophthalmic

 

or ketorolac tromethamine, and a soft contact lens

solution as the agent primarily responsible (Gaynes).

 

was most effective in achieving post-PRK analgesia.

The demonstrated safety of ketorolac throughout

 

They also found that NSAIDs added to topical steroid

numerous studies, some as long as 6 weeks duration,

 

protocols had a significantly greater effect than steroids

suggests that this drug is safe for extended use. If fact

 

alone on reducing myopic regression for one year

ketorolac has actually been recommended for the

 

postoperatively (Arshinoff, 1994).

treatment of post-cataract inflammation in a patient

 

 

 

with systemic steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis post-

 

 

 

phacoemulsification. In this patient the fear of “melting”

 

Prevention of CME

 

led the physician to avoid topical NSAIDs. However,

 

the severe reaction postoperatively led him to using

 

All available evidence demonstrates that ketorolac is

 

it successfully in the second eye with excellent results

 

an effective treatment for acute and chronic CME.

(Caronia).

 

Several studies, however, suggest that ketorolac is also

The available evidence demonstrates that NSAIDs

 

able to prevent CME in postoperative patients. A study

are highly effective analgesics for pain associated with

 

by Flach and associates (1990) suggested that ketorolac

cataract and refractive procedures. The ability to

 

prevents CME without the risks associated with

provide relief of patient pain is critical because patients

 

concomitant topical steroid treatment. In that study,

have high expectations and expect almost no pain with

 

50 patients with bilateral cataracts were enrolled in a

ophthalmic surgeries. Patients who experience ocular

 

placebo-controlled, paired-comparison, double-

pain or discomfort may therefore believe that their

 

masked study. Eleven patients had evidence of

surgeon may have substandard surgical skills and the

 

angiographic (angiographic aphakic CME) ACME on

resulting patient dissatisfaction and potential for

 

postoperative day 40. Two of these patients demons-

negative word of mouth to the patient’s colleagues

 

trated bilateral ACME, one patient had ACME in the

and friends may have adverse consequences for a

 

NSAID-treated eye, and eight patients had ACME in

surgical practice. Choosing the most effective topical

 

the placebo-treated eye. This was a statistically

agent for relief of ocular inflammation and pain

 

significant difference favoring drug treatment. In

postoperatively is therefore.

 

addition, the signs of anterior ocular inflammation were

The adjunctive use of NSAIDs with steroids optimizes

 

greater in the eyes with ACME.

surgical outcomes as numerous studies have

 

Roberts presented data from a clinical study at the

demonstrated that the combination of an NSAID and

 

2005 meeting of ASCRS that demonstrated that

steroid is more effective for the treatment of post-

 

patients using preoperative and postoperative NSAIDs

operative inflammation, CME, and improving visual

 

had less postoperative increase in macular thickness

acuity than either NSAID or steroid monotherapy.

 

than those who did not use NSAIDs. In that study,

Perhaps the most important effect to surgeons is

 

200 patients undergoing phacoemulsification were

the increased amount of dilation preoperatively and

 

randomized to two pharmaceutical treatment

the tendency for the dilation to remain for the entire

 

regimens, differing only by the inclusion/exclusion of

procedure. Some surgeons have likened this effect as

 

ketorolac 0.4% into the standard treatment regimen.

like having a third hand during surgery. Other studies

 

Outcome measures included macular thickness by OCT

point out the direct relationship between pupil size and

 

at preoperative and 4 weeks postoperative, contrast

rate of surgical complications (Donnenfeld).

 

sensitivity by FACT, and Snellen visual acuity. After 4

In recent years, there has been a substantially

 

weeks, the change in macular thickness was

amount of debate in the ophthalmic community

 

substantially greater without NSAIDs than with

regarding the use of NSAIDs prior to surgery to prevent

 

(10.4 μm compared with 4.2 μm, respectively). There

the formation of CME. We understand and accept that

 

were no differences in visual acuity. The author

increased inflammation postoperatively is associated

 

 

 

 

 

 

240

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

with an increased risk of developing CME. In fact, a

2.

Caronia RM, Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED, J Cataract and

 

 

 

 

study by Ursell and associates reported that patients

 

Refractive Surg 2002;28:1880-81.

 

 

who had angiographic CME at day 60 were more likely

3.

Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD, Wittpenn JR, Solomon R,

 

 

to have had more postoperative inflammation than

 

Nattis A, Chou T. Preoperative ketorolac tromethamine

 

 

 

0.4% in phacoemulsification outcomes: pharmacokinetic-

 

 

patients who did not develop CME. (Ursell) It follows,

 

 

 

 

response curve. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006

 

 

therefore, that preventing inflammation with pro-

 

 

 

 

Sep;32(9):1474-82.

 

 

phylactic dosing would decrease the risk of developing

 

 

 

4.

Evans RE, Bucci FA Jr, Amico LM. Efficacy of Ketorolac

 

 

CME. A recent study by Donnenfeld and associates

 

0.5% versus Ketorolac 0.4% Following Cataract Surgery.

 

 

 

 

(Donnenfeld) does provide us with evidence

 

Presented at ARVO 2005.

 

 

supporting the use of ketorolac 0.4% as surgical

5.

Flach AJ, Stegman RC, Graham J, Kruger LP. Prophylaxis

 

 

prophylaxis against CME. The study was a prospective

 

of aphakic cystoid macular edema without corticosteroids.

 

 

 

A paired-comparison, placebo-controlled double-masked

 

 

evaluation of 100 patients randomized in a double-

 

 

 

 

study. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1253-58.

 

 

masked fashion prior to phacoemulsification into 4

 

 

 

6.

Flach AJ. Corneal melts associated with topically applied

 

 

groups: one group received preoperative ketorolac

 

 

 

nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Trans Am

 

 

tromethamine 0.4% four times daily for 3 days and

 

Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:205-10; discussion 210-12.

 

 

three doses every 15 minutes immediately surgery,

7.

Gaynes BI, Fiscella R. Topical nonsteroidal anti-

 

 

another received four doses on the day before surgery

 

inflammatory drugs for ophthalmic use: a safety review.

 

 

ketorolac 0.4% and three doses every 15 minutes

8.

Drug Saf. 2002;25:233-50.

 

 

immediately surgery, another received ketorolac only

Goyal R, Shankar J, Fone DL, Hughes DS. Randomized

 

 

 

controlled trial of ketorolac in the management of corneal

 

 

3 times (every 15 minutes) in the hour immediately

 

 

 

 

abrasions. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001 Apr;79(2):

 

 

surgery, and the fourth group was randomized to

 

 

 

 

177-79.

 

 

control. In that study, use of ketorolac for 1 or 3 days

9.

Guzek JP, Holm M, Cotter JB, et al. Risk factors for

 

 

reduced the incidence of CME. No patients in these

 

intraoperative complications in 1000 extracapsular

 

 

groups had CME at week 2, compared with 12% (3/

 

cataract cases. Ophthalmology 1987;94:461-66.

 

 

25) of control patients and 4% (1/25) of patients in

10.

Heier J, Cheetham JK, Degryse R, et al. Ketorolac

 

 

the 1 hour group. This study suggests that three day

 

tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution in the treatment

 

 

 

of moderate to severe ocular inflammation after cataract

 

 

preoperative dosing with ketorolac effectively prevents

 

 

 

 

surgery: a randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. Am

 

 

CME. Other findings of that study demonstrated that

 

 

 

 

J Ophthalmol 1999;127:253-59.

 

 

ketorolac maintained pupil size, reduced discomfort,

11.

Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Kampik A, Schonfeld CL.

 

 

limited reductions in epithelial cell counts, and reduced

 

Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and

 

 

patient need for additional anesthesia. Ketorolac also

 

ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction. A

 

 

provided substantial reductions in the amount of time

 

prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Graefes

 

 

needed to perform surgery, making it a cost-effective

 

Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005 Mar 9; [Epub ahead

 

 

 

of print].

 

 

pharmaceutical for cataract surgery. Most of these data

 

 

 

12.

Kaiser PK, Pineda R 2nd. A study of topical nonsteroidal

 

 

followed a clear dose-response pattern, suggesting that

 

 

 

anti-inflammatory drops and no pressure patching in the

 

 

maximum prophylaxis can be expected with the three

 

 

 

 

treatment of corneal abrasions. Corneal Abrasion

 

 

days dosing regimen, though even 1 day of ketorolac

 

Patching Study Group. Ophthalmology 1997;104:

 

 

was consistently superior to 1 hour of ketorolac or to

 

1353-59.

 

 

control. Flach and Roberts that ketorolac is an effective

13.

McColgin AZ, Heier JS. Control of intraocular

 

 

prophylaxis against CME.

 

inflammation associated with cataract surgery. Curr Opin

 

 

 

Ophthalmol 2000;11(1):3-6.

 

 

If a 3-day dosing regimen of ketorolac is effective

 

 

 

14.

Mentes J, Erakgun T, Afrashi F, Kerci G.Incidence of

 

 

surgical prophylaxis, what is the most appropriate

 

 

 

cystoid macular edema after uncomplicated

 

 

postoperative dosing regimen? In my experience, 4

 

 

 

 

phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica 2003 Nov-

 

 

weeks of QID dosing with ketorolac 0.4% is optimal

 

Dec;217(6):408-12.

 

 

for most patients, in patients with diabetes mellitus we

15.

O'brien TP. Emerging guidelines for use of NSAID therapy

 

 

use at least 6 weeks of therapy and most important

 

to optimize cataract surgery patient care. Curr Med Res

 

 

in patients with diabetic retinopathy we use ketorolac

16.

Opin 2005 Jul;21(7):1131-38.

 

 

0.4% for at least three months to help protect this

Polansky JR, Weinreb RN. Steroids as anti-inflammatory

 

 

 

agents. In: Sears ML, ed. Pharmacology of the Eye. New

 

 

most susceptible group from developing CME.

 

 

 

 

York, NY: Springer-Verlag 1984;460-538.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

17.

Price FW Jr, Price MO, Zeh W, Dobbins K. Pain reduction

 

 

 

after laser in situ keratomileusis with ketorolac

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tromethamine ophthalmic solution 0.5%: a randomized,

 

 

1. Arshinoff S, D'Addario D, Sadler C, Bilotta R, Johnson

 

 

 

 

double-masked, placebo-controlled trial. J Refract Surg.

 

 

TM. Use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

 

2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):140-44.

 

 

in excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract

18.

Price FW, Tonon E, VanDenburgh AM, Stern K,

 

 

Refract Surg. 1994;20:216-22.

 

Cheetham JK, Schiffman RM. Safety and Efficacy of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Optimizing Visual Outcomes with NSAIDs Therapy in Cataract and Refractive Surgery

 

 

241

Reformulated Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% Ophthalmic

antimiotic and anti-inflammatory in cataract surgery. J

 

Solution in Post-Photorefractive Keratectomy Patients.

Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1225-27.

 

 

 

Presented at ARVO 2003.

 

 

31. Snyder RW, Siekert RW, Schwiegerling J, Donnenfeld E,

 

19. Price MO, Price FW. Efficacy of topical ketorolac

Thompson P. Acular as a single agent for use as an

 

tromethamine 0.4% for control of pain or discomfort

antimiotic and anti-inflammatory in cataract surgery. J

 

associated with cataract surgery. Curr Med Res Opin 2004

Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1225-27.

 

 

 

Dec;20(12):2015-19.

 

 

32. Solomon KD, Donnenfeld ED, Raizman M, et al. Safety

 

20. Quinn CJ. Cystoid macular edema. Optom Clin

and efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic

 

1996;5(1):111-30.

 

 

solution in post-photorefractive keratectomy patients. J

 

 

 

 

21. Ray S. D'Amico DJ. Pseudophakic macular edema.

Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1653-60.

 

Semin Ophthalmol 2002;17:167-80.

 

33. Solomon KD, Donnenfeld ED, Raizman M, et al. Safety

 

22. Rho DS, Soll SM. Combination Therapy for

and efficacy of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% ophthalmic

 

Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema: Diclofenac

solution in post-photorefractive keratectomy patients. J

 

Sodium 0.1% and Prednisolone Acetate 1% Versus

Cataract Refract Surg 2004 Aug;30(8):1653-60.

 

Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5% and Prednisolone Acetate

34. Solomon KD, Turkalj JW, Whiteside SB, Stewart JA,

 

1%. Presented at ARVO 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

Apple DJ. Topical 0.5% ketorolac vs 0.03% flurbiprofen

 

23. Rho DS. Treatment of acute pseudophakic cystoid

 

for inhibition of miosis during cataract surgery. Arch

 

macular edema: Diclofenac versus ketorolac. J Cataract

 

Ophthalmol 1997 Sep;115(9):1119-22.

 

 

 

Refract Surg 2003 Dec;29(12):2378-84.

 

 

 

 

 

35. Solomon KD, Turkalj JW, Whiteside SB, Stewart JA,

 

24. Roberts CW. Comparison of the Ocular Comfort of Acular

 

Apple DJ. Topical 0.5% ketorolac vs 0.03% flurbiprofen

 

LS with Acular PF in Healthy Volunteers. Presented at

 

for inhibition of miosis during cataract surgery. Arch

 

ARVO 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ophthalmol 1997;115:1119-22.

 

 

 

25. Roberts CW. Pretreatment with topical diclofenac sodium

 

 

 

36. Solomon KD, Vroman DT, Barker D, Gehlken J.

 

to decrease postoperative inflammation. Ophthalmology

 

Comparison of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% and

 

1996;103:636-39.

 

 

 

 

 

rimexolone 1% to control inflammation after cataract

 

26. Rossetti L, Autelitano A. Cystoid macular edema

 

extraction. Prospective randomized double-masked

 

following cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol

 

study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001 Aug;27(8):1232-37.

 

2000;11:65-72.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37. Srinivasan R, Madhavaranga. Topical

ketorolac

 

27. Sandoval HP, Fernandez de Castro LE, Vroman DT,

 

tromethamine 0.5% versus diclofenac sodium 0.1% to

 

Solomon KD.

Comparison

of 0.4%

Ketorolac

 

inhibit miosis during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract

 

Tromethamine Ophthalmic Solution vs 0.5% Ketorolac

 

Surg 2002 Mar;28(3):517-20.

 

 

 

Tromethamine

Ophthalmic

Solution

to Prevent

 

 

 

38. Stewart R, Grosserode R, Cheetham JK, et al. Efficacy and

 

Inflammation After Phacoemulsification and Intraocular

 

safety profile of ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution in

 

Lens Implantation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-

 

the prevention of surgically induced miosis during

 

Masked, Clinical Trial. Presented at ARVO 2005.

 

cataract surgery. Clin Ther 1999;21:723-32.

 

 

 

28. Schechter BA, Wittpenn JR. Evaluation of Ketorolac

 

 

 

39. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB.

 

(Acular LS) During the Induction Phase of Cyclosporine

 

a (Restasis) Therapy to Improve Patient Comfort.

Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification:

 

Presented at ARVO 2005.

 

 

relationship to blood-aqueous barrier damage and visual

 

29. Singal N, Hopkins J. Pseudophakic cystoid macular

acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999 Nov;25(11):

 

edema: ketorolac alone vs. ketorolac plus prednisolone.

1492-97.

 

 

 

Can J Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;39(3):245-50.

40. Waterbury LD, Flach AJ. Efficacy of low concentrations

 

30. Snyder RW, Siekert RW, Schwiegerling J, Donnenfeld E,

of ketorolac tromethamine in animal models of ocular

 

Thompson P. Acular as a single agent for use as an

inflammation. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:345-52.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C H A P T E R

38Management of Cystoid

Macular Edema

Arturo Pérez-Arteaga, René Cano-Hidalgo (Mexico)

Introduction

Cystoid macular edema (CME) is an inflammatory condition of the central retina that can be produced for many causes, since drugs for other ophthalmic diseases until surgical intervention of the eye. If well the initial descriptions of the disease can be found as a surgical complication, now we know much more conditions that can produce these clinical and paraclinical findings, so that we can talk about a multifactorial disease.

Many drugs are involved in the treatment of this condition. The choose of each one is according the etiology of the inflammatory process, preference of the physician, response of the patient, underlying disease, severity of visual loss and anatomic findings. Even surgical treatment has been described, and so the use of specifical drugs during and after the procedure; so it is a very good way to review the drugs involved in the treatment of this pathologic condition according to the physioscopy of this book, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs in ophthalmology. In fact several proven treatment modalities are available and so on new therapies are continuing to expand our horizons.

First the reader will find in this chapter a brief description of CME definition, etiology, clinical findings and diagnostic strategies. Then the drugs that are involved in the treatment of this condition, including those used in the surgical treatment will be described.

Definition

CME is a pathologic condition of the macula with swelling where multiple cyst-like (cystoid) areas of fluid appear in the central retina, mostly in the outer plexiform layer. It is a painless disorder that according to the cause and severity can be fully reversed or can cause permanent visual loss. Sometimes this condition has clinical manifestations from low to severe, but also can occur in the sub-clinic plane.

Etiology

POST-SURGICAL, PRIMARY OR SECONDARY (CAPSULOTOMY)

It was first described as the Irving-Gass syndrome; a pathologic condition where Irving in 1953 mentioned a decrease in the visual acuity with vitreoretinal alterations after the intracapsular surgery of the lens, and Gass and Norton described the typical fluorangiographic changes of this condition. At that time 77% of the eyes operated with intracapsular cataract surgery developed some degree of CME, even sometimes subclinical.

During the days of the extracapsular cataract extraction the incidence decreased because the preservation of the posterior capsule and the decrease of vitreous loss. Even so, this incidence increase when there is posterior capsule rupture in an extracapsular technique. With the entrance of phacoemulsification techniques for cataract surgery the incidence was even less, but again, it was demostrated that the main goal to decrease this condition is the conservation of the posterior capsule and to avoid the vitreous loss. It is still to be proved that the newest technologies of minimally invasive cataract surgery can produce a statistical reduction of post-cataract surgery CME.

The posterior capsulotomy is also a very well-known procedure that can lead to CME, and it is also related to the rupture of the retinal and accuous barriers; so in this field new technologies and evolution of intraocular lenses that can reduce the incidence of posterior capsule opacification are very important.

Any kind of intraocular surgery can produce sometime some degree of CME. At the end the cascade of events become from the rupture of the intraocular barriers. The initial trauma (damage, surgery, etc.) produce the liberation of the chemical mediators of the inflammation to the accuous and vitreous; mainly prostaglandins are produced by the damaged tissue and the traumatized epithelial cells, but many other

Management of Cystoid Macular Edema

 

 

243

factors like the complement, the platelet activation

of risk factors like cataract surgery, uveitis, posterior

 

factor, lisozomal enzymes, cytoquines, nitric oxide,

capsulotomy and diabetic retinopathy.

 

 

 

endothelin and interleukin. We can conclude that any

This concepts must be taken in count by the

 

factor that contributes to the rupture of the barriers

physician at the time to prescribe this medications in

 

blood-accuous and blood-retinal is going to increase

particular if some risk factors are present in some patient.

 

the possibility to develope CME.

If the therapy can be done with another medication

 

 

it will be better, but if it must be continued for some

 

MICROVASCULAR DAMAGE

reason, the utilization of non-steroidal

anti-

 

 

This is commonly found in diabetic retinopathy,

inflammatory drugs can avoid the development of

 

CME without loss of the hypotensor effect of the anti-

 

occlusive diseases like retinal vein occlusions, and other

 

glaucoma drugs. Also a constant follow-up with the

 

less commonly diseases like idiopathic juxtafoveal

 

explanation to the patient of specific symptoms of

 

capillary telangiectasia. The main factor is again the

 

macular disease and Amsler test in each visit for

 

rupture of the intraocular barriers that this vascular

 

glaucoma control, are mandatory.

 

 

 

alterations produce and the liberation of the mentioned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mediators during the acute vascular event. Some other

PERIPHERAL RETINAL LESIONS

 

 

 

factors like the VEGF and IGF-1 liberated by the

 

 

 

ischemic tissues, have been involved in the rupture

A peripheral lesion, can lead by itself, to the rupture

 

of the intraocular barriers and so in the production

of the intraocular barriers and so the development of

 

of CME. Any syndrome associated with sub-retinal

CME. It is a good behavior to explorate the periphery

 

neovascularization can have the same effect.

of the retina in a case when we find CME and we

 

 

are trying to know the cause.

 

 

 

INFLAMMATORY DISEASES

TUMORAL DISEASES

 

 

 

The most well-known form of uveitis that can produce

 

 

 

CME is pars planitis; in fact CME is the main cause

Because of acummulation of leakage and rupture of

 

of visual loss in this inflammatory process, but many

the barriers, many ocular tumors, like malignant

 

other forms of uveitis like Behçet´s disease, Crohn´s

melanomas, peripheral capillary hemangiomas and

 

disease, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis and some

Coat´s disease can be also cause of CME.

 

 

 

other forms of non-specifical uveitis can produce some

 

 

 

 

degree of CME. The cause is as mentioned before,

EYE HYPOTONY

 

 

 

the liberation of the inflammatory mediators.

It can be post-traumatic, with or without rupture of

 

 

 

POST-MEDICATION (ANTIGLAUCOMA DRUGS

the globe, it can be followed cataract surgery, glaucoma

 

procedures or choroidal effussions of any cause. At

 

AND PRESERVATIVES)

 

the end, the low intraocular pressure is the cause for

 

The first reference about the relation between an anti-

 

the rupture of the intraocular barriers and so the

 

glaucoma medication and the development of CME

liberation of mediators.

 

 

 

was described by Becker in 1967 and was with the

 

 

 

 

use of epinephrine; was noted years after, that this

OPTIC NERVE DISEASES

 

 

 

incidence was more in the aphakic patient. It is well

 

 

 

Optic nerve inflammations like true papilledema,

 

known at this time, that the topical epinephrine

 

neuropathy or some ischemic diseases can produce

 

increase the prostaglandins in the eye, in particular

 

CME.

 

 

 

in the aphakic one, and so the rupture of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

intraocular barriers.

RETINAL TRACTION

 

 

 

Some other medications were described to

 

 

 

produce this effect like dipivalylepinephrine, timolol

Peripheral traction, macular traction, epiretinal

 

and benzalconium chloride. Recently with the arise of

membranes, and traction produced by diabetic

 

new pharmacologic groups of anti-glaucomatous

retinopathy (even without direct macular traction) are

 

medication, in particular prostaglandins, the incidence

common entities that can produce CME.

 

 

 

of post-medication CME has increase. A lot of studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

have been conducted in this field and what we know

FINAL COMMON PATHWAY OF UNDERLYING

 

currently is that latanoprost, travoprost, bimatoprost

 

DISEASES

 

 

 

and unoprostone can produce some degree of CME

 

 

 

Ischemic, tractional, inflammatory, toxic and genetic.

 

and that this incidence can increase with the association

 

 

 

 

 

 

244

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

Histopathology

poor visuality like 20/400 or less in severe cases. Like

 

 

 

 

some others macular diseases the patients can

 

 

The breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier due

 

 

experience some degree of metamorphopsia.

 

 

to vasogenic and/or cytotoxic causes is the initial event

At the clinical examination the evidence of surgery,

 

 

in CME. There is a leaking of the perifoveal capillaries

trauma, vascular retinal diseases and others like

 

 

leading the formation of edema. The fluid collects in

glaucoma diseases must be achieved. Of course the

 

 

the loosely arranged outer plexiform layer of Henle;

main study is the fundoscopy where the macular

 

 

in this layer the fibers are arranged in an horizontal

thickening and/or swelling can be found. It also can

 

 

 

pattern. This is the cause of the petalloid flower

be found in many degrees depending upon the severity

 

 

appearance that is seen as characteristic of this disease

of the disease, and can go since a loss of foveolar reflex

 

 

in the angiogram (cystic pattern) (Fig. 38.1).

with out clinical evidence of edema, to a characteristic

 

 

Electronic microscopy has shown acummulation of

cystic appearance. This is the typical clinical finding in

 

 

intracelullar fluid within expanded Müller cell processes.

the ophthalmoscopy, radiating cystic spaces emana-

 

 

 

ting from the macula. Of course, in these cases, there

 

 

 

is a complete loss of the red reflex. The red free light

 

 

 

examination is mandatory, where a “honeycombed”

 

 

 

appearance is seen, and it corresponds to the fluid

 

 

 

filled cyst (Fig. 38.2). In severe cases these cyst may

 

 

 

coalesce into a macular cyst and then form a hole.

Fig. 38.1: Cystic pattern

Clinical Findings

There is always an history of previous ocular disease, surgery, medication, vitreous pathology or another condition in the patient that developes CME. Sometimes it can be very easy to obtain, like previous cataract surgey or posterior capsulotomy, but in some others, the physician must be very accurate like in glaucoma medications, posterior vitreous detachment or peripheral tears that may lead to the break of the inner blood-retinal barrier.

The main symptom of CME is the reduction of visual acuity, even so, here are many forms of CME that goes free of visual symptoms. Many patients that undergo a cataract surgery can develop some degree of sub-clinical CME, and the only one evidence can be found in a retinal fluorogram. The degree of the disease and so the severity of symptoms frequently correlates with the degree of complications during the cataract surgery, if this is the case. So the reduction of visual acuity may undergo from a minimal degree, like 20/25 and be not notice by the patient, until very

Fig. 38.2: Loss of red reflex

PARACLINICALAPPROACH

No laboratory studies are necessary to establish the diagnosis of CME. The main study in the establishment of this diagnosis is the fluorescein angiogram (FA).

In the FA parafoveal retinal capillary leakage is seen in the early and mid phases. These phases are not characteristic of CME because the acummulation of fluid in certain conditions is delayed, so the late phase has a particular importance, and it is about 20 minutes and sometimes can be more, to find the characteristic petaloid pattern of leakage in the macula.

Another related conditions can be seen in the FA according the underlying disease: If likeage microaneurysms are present, diabetic retinopathy can be the cause; vascular collaterals can be due to retinal oclussion; optic nerve findings are also useful in the final etiologic diagnosis establishment.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive method also very useful in the final diagnosis

Management of Cystoid Macular Edema

 

 

245

of CME because the fluid-filled spaces in the retina

NON-SURGICALAPPROACH

 

 

 

are easily seen. This cross-sectional image of the retina

Many drugs have been involved for the treatment of

 

can also be helpful in the monitoring over time of the

 

CME during the time. Some of them are used as a

 

disease by quantifying the amount of fluid inside the

 

traditional fashion and some others are emerging as

 

retina in serial studies. A non-invasive study can be

 

new therapeutic resources.

 

 

 

the ideal modality in monitoring the response to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

treatment.

Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

 

In particular cases an electroretinogram can also

 

The main effect of this group of drugs is to estabilize

 

be helpful but not mandatory (Figs 38.3 to 38.5).

 

 

 

the blood-retinal barrier. This effect is because they

 

 

 

inhibit the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase. They can be used

 

 

 

by systemic way and also in the form of eyedrops.

 

 

 

The main examples of this group of medications are:

 

 

 

1.

Indomethacin

 

 

 

 

 

2.

Ketorolac

 

 

 

 

 

3.

Diclofenac

 

 

 

 

 

 

They inhibite the prostaglandin synthesis by

 

 

 

decreasing the activity of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase.

 

 

 

These drugs in the topical form must be used as a

 

 

 

medication in the preoperative and postoperative

 

 

 

period of some intraocular procedures like cataract

 

Fig. 38.3: Macular quistic edema

surgery, posterior capsulotomy and peripheral

 

iridectomy for example, to reduce the incidence of

 

 

 

 

 

 

CME. This profilactic form also helps to reduce the

 

 

 

postoperative inflammatory process. As has been said

 

 

 

before, the development of CME in some way

 

 

 

correlates with the degree of manipulation during the

 

 

 

ocular surgery and some factors have been

 

 

 

demonstrated in the development of CME like the

 

 

 

time of light microscope exposure, posterior capsule

 

 

 

rupture and vitreous manipulation. Of course, a real

 

 

 

“clean” surgery can decrease the incidence of CME,

 

 

 

but anyway, the use of NSAIDs

is mandatory. New

 

 

 

operative devices that avoid the use of direct light

 

Fig. 38.4: CME plus epiretinal membrane

exposure during the ocular surgery are promising in

 

the near future to decrease the incidence of CME in

 

 

 

 

 

 

uncomplicated surgery cases.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The use of systemic NSAIDs is only reserve for the

 

 

 

cases of complete diagnosis of CME; even so some

 

 

 

surgeons are using them as a profilactic medication.

 

 

 

There is not a recomended time for the use of systemic

 

 

 

NSAIDs for the treatment of CME; the time of use

 

 

 

will depend upon the response of each patient in

 

 

 

particular according the follow-up.

 

 

 

 

Because sometimes it is a long-term medication,

 

 

 

secondary effects of NSAIDs must be always taken in

 

 

 

count. In the systemic medication, gastric effects should

 

Fig. 38.5: Epiretinal membrane plus macular cystic edema

be monitoring during the visits of the patient. A history

 

of gastric diseases including ulcerative disease and

 

 

 

bleeding is mandatory when oral indomethacin is in

 

Treatment

 

use. If some of these effects are present the

 

 

therapeutic must be suspended and replaced by other

 

The treatment of CME can be divided in two

medication.

 

 

 

approaches that finally in the practice are combined

 

Local NSAIDs have also some secondary effects;

 

but in the theory we are going to describe separately.

long-term use may delay wound healing and has been

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

246

 

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Trauma

 

reported cases of corneal stromal thinning or melting

of the blood-ocular barrier. They can be useful in some

 

 

 

 

in some particular patients receiving diclophenac

forms of uveitic CME. Nevertheless the secondary

 

 

eyedrops for extended period of time. If symptoms

effects of systemic corticoid medication must be

 

 

like blurred or diminished vision and signs of corneal

avoided, and this is why recently the medication of

 

 

deposits, retinal changes and scotoma are present, the

CME is trying to move to the ocular space instead the

 

 

medication must be suspended.

systemic route.

 

 

Corticosteroids

Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors (CAIs)

 

Steroidal medication is very useful in the treatment of CME and also in the prevention of it. The routine use of steroids in the eyedrops form before and after surgical procedures, has decrease the incidence of postsurgical CME, even in complicated cases.

The most frequent form of steroid medication for CME is topical, in the form of prednisolone acetate; it is indicated in several conditions of steroid-responsive intraocular inflammation. The presentation is at 1% solution and can be used several times in a day according the severity of the inflammation. The amount and time of administration must be measured according the response of the disease to the treatment. Monitoring of the side effects of topical steroids like, raise in the intraocular pressure and an increased risk of secondary ocular infections, must be evaluating during the time of therapy and this should be discontinued if some of these effects are found. Not all patients have the same response to steroids according the rise in the intraocular pressure; some patients can tolerate large periods of time without changes in the pressure, but some others cannot tolerate too much medication. If the topical steroid therapy is really needed in these cases, the physician can add some glaucoma therapy; medications that can increase the CME should be avoided (e.g. latanoprost, travoprost, epinephrine); the best adjunctive antiglaucoma medication is dorsolamide that also can have some benefit effects in the macula. Other side effects of long-term topical steroids like subcapsular cataract formation must be addressed.

The use of injections of long acting depot-steroids (e.g. triamcinolone) into the sub-Tenon space has also a role in the treatment of CME. This external way of administration that can have more penetration to the retina; the drug delivery to the retina is superior by this route in comparison to peribulbar. In some cases of uveitic CME refractory to conventional treatment, the triamcinolone has been used in intravitreous injection alone or in combination with some other drugs. Triamcinolone alone has been effectively in reducing CME and improving vision; some studies are currently underway in the combination of this steroidal drug with other drugs, like bevacizumab (Avastin).

Oral steroids play also an important role in the treatment of CME because the effect in the stabilization

Carbonic anhydrase is an enzyme present in the apical and basal surfaces of the retinal pigment epithelium cell membrane. Its action is to pump and produce a change in the ion flux. CAIs enhance this pumping action of these cells, and helps to improve this ion flux that affects the cellular environment of the retina.

CAIs are commonly used in ophthalmology, in particular in the glaucoma cases, where the topical medication is not enough to control the intraocular pressure, so it is a well-known resource. Also the physician is close to side effects of the CAIs, like the alteration in the ionic composition of blood, increase in urine excretion, and in large doses hepatic and metabolic problems. So it is known that it is not a chronic medication, it has to be used according the severity and response to treatment of CME and the physician has to advice the patient the side effects, the mode to contrarest them and the total communication they both have to mantain in order to manage the dose in good response, but also in good levels of side effects. This medication should be suspended as soon as possible according the evolution of CME.

The presentation of acetazolamide is in tablets of 250 mg and can be given until three to four times a day. Close monitoring of antiinflammatory and side effects is mandatory.

Intravitreal Medication

Recently new drugs are appearing in the retinal medication field for intravitreal injection, like Bevacizumab (Avastin) and Pegaptinib, also called Macugen. These drugs are promising results in many retinal vascular disorders like occlusive diseases and diabetic retinopathy. The side effects are not completely known, and many trials around the world are in progress at this time to achieve consistent results.

The apparently positive action seen in some vascular disorders lead the possibility to use them in CME. Some of them are including only diabetic patients, some others only postoperative cataract patients and some others are combining the avastin with triamcinolone. During the middle of year 2007 these trials will be finish and we will be able to know the safety, efficacy and probably side effects of these drugs in the treatment of CME.