Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
10.64 Mб
Скачать

400

D.J. Browning

 

 

increasing federal regulation of these relationships is significant. Whether the traditional model of physician behavior based on professionalism will be displaced by a different model based on a buyer–vendor relationship is difficult to predict, but there seems to be a trend in that direction. All of these issues will have direct consequences for the care of diabetic retinopathy.

References

1.Cohen JJ, Cruess S, Davidson C. Alliance between society and medicine. The public’s stake in medical professionalism. JAMA. 2007;298:670–673.

2.Tonelli MR. Conflict of interest in clinical practice. Chest. 2007;132:664–670.

3.Browning DJ, Fraser CM, Powers ME. A spreadsheet template for the analysis of optical coherence tomography in the longitudinal management of diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2006;37:399–405.

4.Lattanzio R, Brancato R, Pierro L, et al. Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in diabetic patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002;12:482–487.

5.Hussain A, Hussain N, Nutheti R. Comparison of mean macular thickness using optical coherence tomography and visual acuity in diabetic retinopathy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33:240–245.

6.Gaucher D, Tadayoni R, Erginay A, et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the vitreoretinal relationship in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:807–813.

7.Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796–1806.

8.Abu El Asrar AM, Morse PH. Laser photocoagulation control of diabetic macular edema without fluorescein angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:97–99.

9.Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Comparison of the modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study and mild macular grid laser photocoagulation strategies for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:469–480.

10.Browning DJ. Diabetic macular edema: a critical review of the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) series and subsequent studies. Comp Ophthalmol Update. 2000;1:69–83.

11.Pinto JB. The retina practice: economics, benchmarks, and career issues. Retin Phys. 6-26-2009. http://www. retinalphysician.com/article.aspx?article=100065

12.Dana J, Loewenstein G. A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. JAMA. 2003;290: 252–255.

13.Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Scott IU, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Bressler NM, Chan CK, et al. A phase II randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1860–1867.

14.The Economist. This is going to hurt. The Economist 2009 Jun 27; p.13.

15.Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science. 1968;162:1243–1248.

16.Eye care: percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy who had a dilated macular or fundus exam performed with documented communication to the physician who manages the on-going care of the patient with diabetes regarding the findings of the macular or fundus exam at least once within 12 months. 6-20-2009. http://www.qualitymea sures.ahrq.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=10290

17.Rothman D. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Physician Behavior and Physician Groups. Abstr Academy Health Meet. volume 21. 2004. http://gateway.nlm.nih. gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=103624520.html

18.Super N. From capitation to fee-for-service in Cincinnati: a physician group responds to a changing marketplace. Health Aff. 2006;25:219–225.

19.Kralewski JE, Rich EC, Feldman R, et al. The effects of medical group practice and physician payment methods on costs of care. Health Serv Res. 2000;35:591–613.

20.Lichter PR. Continuing medical education, physicians, and Pavlov: can we change what happens when industry rings the bell? Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1593–1597.

21.Lichter P. Debunking myths in physician–industry conflicts of interest. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:159–171.

22.Harris G. In article, doctors back ban on gifts from drug makers. New York Times 2006 Jan 25. http://www.nyti mes.com/2006/01/25/national/25doctor.html

23.Millard WB. Docking the tail that wags the dog: banning drug reps from academic medical facilities. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:785–791.

24.Chren MM. Interactions between physicians and drug company representatives. Am J Med. 1999;107:182–183.

25.Krasner J. Mass. group links drug costs, marketing. Boston Globe A.D. Jan 17. http://www.boston.com/busi ness/healthcare/articles/2008/01/17/ mass_group_links_drug_costs_marketing/

26.Wang SS. Drug firms’ medical staffs say what salespeople can’t. Wall Street Journal 2009 Jun 26; B3.

27.Ferguson J. My $100,000 sideline. Med Econ. 2009;81:28–29.

28.Petersen M. Merck is said to limit perks in marketing to physicians. New York Times 2002 Jan 18. http://www. nytimes.com/2002/01/18/business/merck-is-said-to-limit- perks-in-marketing-to-physicians.html

29.Wall LL, Brown D. The high cost of free lunch. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:169–173.

30.Birch DM, Cohn G. Standing up to industry. Baltimore Sun 2001. http://www.newsday.com/topic/bal-te. research26jun26,0,6517965.story

31.Shimm DS. Human Trials. Scientists, Investors, and Patients in the Quest for a Cure. 7-31-2001.

32.Galewitz P. Cutting-edge option: doctors paid by drugmakers, but say trials not about money. Palm Beach Post 9 A.D. Feb 22.

33.Orlowski JP, Wateska L. The effects of pharmaceutical firm enticements on physician prescribing patterns. There’s no such thing as a free lunch. Chest. 1992;102:270–273.

15 Practical Concerns with Ethical Dimensions in the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

401

 

 

34.Camilleri M, Cortese DA. Managing conflicts of interest in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:607–614.

35.Leary WE. Doctors given millions by drug companies. New York Times 1990 Dec 12; B13.

36.Lempert P, Packer S. Ethical conflicts in universitybased research. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(1):148–149.

37.Ehringhaus SH, Weissman JS, Sears JL, Goold SD, Feibelmann S, Campbell EG. Responses of medical schools to institutional conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2008;299:665–671.

38.Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Ehringhaus S, et al. Institutional academic–industry relationships. JAMA. 2007;298:1779–1786.

39.Packer S, Parke DW, II. Ethical concerns in industry support of continuing medical education: the con side. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(5):773–776.

40.Flach AJ. Letter regarding debunking myths in physician

– industry conflicts of interest. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:562–563.

41.Brennan TA, Rothman DJ, Blumenthal DJ, et al. Health industry practices that create conflicts of interest. A policy proposal of academic medical centers. JAMA. 2006;295:429–433.

42.Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000; 283(3): 373–380.

43.Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:777–786.

44.Morelli D, Koenigsberg MR. Sample medication dispensing in a residency practice. J Fam Pract. 1992;34:42–48.

45.Spingarn RW, Berlin JA, Strom BL. When pharmaceutical manufacturers’ employees present grand rounds, what do residents remember. Acad Med. 1996;71:86–88.

46.Chimonas S, Brennan TA, ROthman DJ. Physicians and drug representatives: exploring the dynamics of the relationship. J Gen Int Med. 2007;22:184–190.

47.Brett AS, Burr W, Moloo J. Are gifts from pharmaceutical companies ethically problematic? A survey of physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2213–2218.

48.Stolberg SG. Study says clinical guides often hide ties of doctors. New York Times 2002 Feb 6. http://www.nyti mes.com/2002/02/06/health/06DRUG.html

49.Bressler NM. Retinal Anastomosis to Choroidal Neovascularization: A Bum Rap for a Difficult Disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1741–1743.

50.Relman AS. Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. JAMA. 2001;285: 2009–2012.

51.Heaphy DP, Marrow VB. Industry funding for continuing medical education: is it ethical? Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:771–773.

52.Chun DW, Heier JS, Topping TM, Duker JS, Bankert JM. A pilot study of multiple intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in patients with center-involving clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1706–1712.

53.Arevalo JF, Fromow-Guerra J, Quiroz-Mercado H, et al. Primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diabetic macular edema results from the Pan-American collaborative retina study group at 6-month follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:743–750.

54.Ehlers JP, Spirn MJ, Lam A, Sivalingam A, Samuel MA, Tasman W. Combination intravitreal bevacizumab/panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Retina. 2008;28:696–702.

55.Packer S, Lynch J. Ethics of comanagement. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:71–76.

56.Digital Healthcare Wins FDA Approval for Retasure. 6- 20-2009. http://www.bio-medicine.org/medicine-news-1/ Digital-Healthcare-Wins-FDA-Approval-for-Retasure- 1779-1/

57.Berlin J, Bruinooge SS, Tannock IF. Ethics in oncology: consulting for the investment industry. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:444–446.

58.Topol EJ, Blumenthal D. Physicians and the investment industry. JAMA. 2005;293:2654–2657.