Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
45.81 Mб
Скачать

166

9  Methods of Dural and Skull Base Treatment

 

 

Fig. 9.10  Reconstruction of the frontal skull base with autogenous bone transplants in combination with a contouring and stabilizing titanium mesh

If several bone grafts are required to reconstruct the skull base in extensive defects (e.g., following gun shot injuries), an extradurally applied microtitanium mesh may be used to stabilize the grafts and provide the contour of the skull base (Hardt et al. 1994; Reinert and Gellrich 1997; Deinsberger et al. 1998; Mick 1999; Kuttenberger and Hardt 2001).

The microtitanium mesh is cut and designed according to the defect form and modelled onto the frontal skull base. The mesh is then fixed with miniscrews lateral to the orbital roof in order to stabilize the bone fragments or grafts, which have been inserted basally between the mesh and the skull base. The titanium mesh itself is totally covered with a wide pericranium flap, so that the entire skull base is covered right up to the edge of the wing of the sphenoid bone (Mick 1999) (Fig. 9.10).

9.3.3.2Intradural Skull Base Occlusion

The dura defects may not be extended or the borders of the basal dura injuries be exposed until the frontobasal, frontofacial, and zygomatico-orbital structures have been completely repositioned and stabilized. Subsequently, following intradural exposure of the boundries, the dural leakage is occluded using a peric- ranium/muscle-patch. In case of severe dural injuries, a pedicled pericranial flap is then applied overlapping the basal dural injury.

The exposed frontal sinus is simultaneously covered by the superiorly placed pericranial flap. The pericranial flap is fixed to the basal dura using interrupted

Fig. 9.11  Schematic diagram illustrating intradural treatment of anterior skull base fractures. The pericranial flap is placed intradurally over the basal dura after obliteration of the nasofrontal duct with a muscle patch (mod. a. Imhof 2000). 1 Muscle patch covering the invaginated nasofrontal duct, 2 pericranial flap, 3 dura mater, 4 galea

sutures along the dural incision borders and circularly around the frontobasal defect. The frontal lobe of the brain is relocated to the anterior skull base now covered with the pericranial flap.

The remaining dura defect will be closed by suturing the pericranial flap to the superior-cranial dural border (Ewers et al. 1995; Imhof 2000) (Fig. 9.11).

If indicated an ICP probe is inserted in the subdural space, ideally through a separate high frontal parasagittal burr hole (Imhof 2000).

The state of the paranasal sinuses should be controlled 4-8 weeks postoperatively following treatment of a frontal skull base injury. In case of congestion or insufficient drainage of the ethmoid cells, an endonasal revision may follow electively as a second procedure (Wigand 1989; Ernst et al. 2004).

9.4Skull Base Treatment/Own Statistics

In skull base reconstruction, several layers are frequently placed over each other, so applying different techniques in one patient.

In our own patients, skull base treatment resulted in 68% having a combined dural suture and duraplasty

References

167

 

 

and in 87% with an additional pericranial flap. Muscle patches from the temporalis muscle were used in 72% to occlude the nasofrontal duct as well as covering the debrided ethmoid cells.

Larger bony defects in the basal region were occluded with autogenous bone fragments or calvarial grafts in 37%. In 61% of our patients, the comminuted dorsal wall of the frontal sinus was resected and a cranialization of the frontal sinus was carried out (Neidhardt 2002).

Techniquesofskullbase-durareconstructioninourowncraniofacial fractures (Neidhardt 2002)

Dural suture and duraplasty

68%

Pericranial flap

87%

Muscle patches

72%

Bone grafts

37%

 

 

References

Chaplin JM, Costantino PD, Wolpoe ME, Bederson JB, Griffey ES, Zhang WX (1999). Use of an acellular dermal allograft for dural replacement: an experimental study. Neurosurgery 45, 2: 320–327.

Christmann F (2003). Kollagenmembran equinen Ursprungs versus humane Leichendura bei Duraplastik – Eine verglei­ chende, tierexperimentelle Studie. Universität – Lübeck.

Deinsberger W, Juedicke A, Boeker DK (1998). Rekonstruktion der vorderen Schädelbasis mit einem Titan-Mikrogitter. In: R Schmelzle(ed),Schädelbasischirurgie.Al-Budoor:Damaskus, pp 92–95.

Derome P (1988). The transbasal approach tumors invading the base of the skull. In: H Schmidek, W Sweet (eds), Operative neurosurgical techniques. Saunders: Philadelphia, pp 619–633.

Draf W, Samii M (1977). Otolaryngo-neurochirurgische Probleme der Schädelbasis. Laryngol Rhinol 56: 1007–1030.

Draf W, Samii M (1983). Fronto-basal injuries – priciples in diagnosisandtreatment.In:MSamii,JBrihaye(eds),Traumatology of the skull base. Springer: Berlin, pp 61–69.

Ernst A, Herzog M, Saidl RO (2004). Traumatologie des Kopf- Hals-Bereiches. Thieme: Stuttgart.

Ewers R, Wild K, Wild M, Ensilidis G (1995). Traumatologie. In: JE Hausamen, E Machtens, J Reuther (eds), Mund-, Kieferund Gesichtschirurgie. Springer: Berlin, pp 211–298.

Frodel JL (2002). Calvarial bone graft harvesting techniques: consideration for their use with rigid fixation techniques in the craniomaxillofacial region. In: AM Greenberg, J Prein (eds), Craniomaxillofacial reconstructive and corrective bone surgery. Springer: New York, pp 478–482.

Hardt N, Gottsauner A, Sgier F (1994). Results of various reconstructive procedures in defects of the fronto-facial area. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir 39: 47–50.

Imhof HG (2000). Das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma. In: O Trentz (ed), Tscherne – Unfallchirurgie (vol 1) Kopf und Körperhöhlen. Springer: Berlin.

Jackson IT, Adham MN, Marsh WR (1986). Use of the galeal frontalis myofascial flap in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 77: 905–910.

Jackson IT, Munro IR, Salyer KE, Whitaker LA (1982). Atlas of craniomaxillofacial surgery. Mosby: St Louis.

Jones NS, Becker DG (2001). Advances in the management of CSF leaks. Br Med J 322: 122–123.

Kessel F K, Guttmann L, Maurer G (1971). Neurotraumatologie mit Einschluss der Grenzgebiete (vol I). Urban und Schwarzenberg: München.

Kessler L (1983). Die Verletzungen des Gesichtsschädels und der Rhinobasis. Thieme: Leipzig.

Kuttenberger J, Hardt N (2001). Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micromesh systems. Craniomaxillofac Surg 29: 75–81.

Lane KL, Brown P, Howell DN, Crain BJ, Hulette CM, Burger PC et al. (1994). Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in a pregnant woman with an implanted dura mater graft. Neurosurgery 34, 4: 737–739.

Martinez-Lage JF, Sola J, Poza M, Esteban JA (1993). Pediatric Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Probable transmission by a dural graft. Childs Nerv Syst 9, 4: 239–242.

Mick G (1999). Skull base reconstruction utilizing titanium mesh in chronic CFS leakage repair. J KY Med Assoc 97, 11: 525–527.

Neidhardt O (2002). Kraniofaziale und frontobasale Schädel­ verletzungen. Retrospektive Nachuntersuchung MKGKlinik – Kantonspital Luzern Dissertation, Universität Basel.

Price JC, Loury M, Carson B, Johns E (1988). The pericranial flap for reconstruction of anterior skull base defects. Laryngoscope 98: 1159–1164.

Probst C (1971). Frontobasale Verletzungen. Huber: Bern. Probst C (1986). Neurosurgical aspects of frontobasal injuries

with cerebrospinal fluid fistulas: Experience with 205 operated patients. Akt Traumatol 16, 2: 43–49.

Probst C, Tomaschett C (1990). The neurosurgical treatment of traumatic fronto-basal spinal fluid fistulas (1982–1986). Akt Traumatol 20, 5: 217–225.

Reinert S, Gellrich NC (1997). Ergebnisse der Sofortrekonstruk­ tion von Knochendefekten im Schädelbasisbereich mit Titan-oder Vitallium-mesh. In: R Rochels, S Behrendt (eds), Orbitachirurgie. Einhorn: Reinbek, pp 341–348.

Rosahl S (1999). Diagnostik und Therapie traumatischer Liquorfisteln. In: R Schmelzle (ed), Schädelbasischirurgie. Al-Budoor: Damaskus, pp 37–39.

Samii M, Draf W (1989). Surgery of the skull base: An interdisciplinary approach. Springer: Berlin.

San-Galli F, Darrouzet V, Rivel J, Baquey C, Ducassou D, Guerin J (1992). Experimental evaluation of a collagencoated vicryl mesh as a dural substitute. Neurosurgery 30, 3: 396–401.

Schick B, Weber R, Mosler P, Keerl R, Draf W (1997). Longterm follow-up of fronto-basal dura-plasty. HNO 45, 3: 117–122.

Schmidek HH, Sweet WH (1988). Operative neurosurgical techniques (vol I). Saunders: Philadelphia.

168

9  Methods of Dural and Skull Base Treatment

 

 

Stanley RB, Schwartz MS (1989). Immediate reconstruction of contaminated central craniofacial injuries with free autogenous grafts. Laryngoscope 99:1011–1015.

Stammberger H (1991). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Decker: Philadelphia.

Stammberger H, Posawetz W (1990). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247, 2: 63–76.

Stoll W (1993). Surgical management of frontobasal injuries (including the orbits) by ENT surgeons. Eur Arch Otorhino­ laryngol Suppl 1: 287–307.

Sundaresan N, Shah J (1988). Craniofacial resection for anterior skull base tumors. Head Neck Surg 10: 219–224.

Süss W, Corradini C (1984). Bakterielle Meningitiden als Spätkomplikation persistierender traumatischer Liquor­ fisteln. Akt Traumatol 14: 193–194.

Unterberger S (1959) Modern therapy of skull injuries with involvement of the frontoand laterobasal pneumatic space Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 38: 441-455

Wigand ME (1989). Endoskopische Chirurgie der Nasenneben­ höhlen und der vorderen Schädelbasis. Thieme: Stuttgart.