- •Dedication
- •Citation
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1 Anatomy of the Craniofacial Region
- •1.1 Anterior Skull Base
- •1.1.1 Cribriform Plate/Crista Galli
- •1.1.2 Fossa Olfactoria
- •1.1.3 Roof of the Orbit
- •1.1.4 Dura
- •1.1.5 Arterial Supply: Skull Base/Dura
- •1.2 Paranasal Sinuses
- •1.2.1 Frontal Sinus
- •1.2.2 Ethmoid
- •1.2.3 Sphenoid
- •1.3 Midface Skeleton
- •1.4 Subcranial and Midface Skeleton
- •References
- •2 Radiology of Craniofacial Fractures
- •2.1 Conventional X-Rays
- •2.2 Computed Tomography
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •2.4 Ultrasonography
- •2.5 Diagnostic Algorithm
- •2.5.1 General Considerations
- •2.5.2 Craniocerebral Trauma
- •2.5.2.1 The Initial CT After Trauma
- •2.5.3 Skull Base Fractures
- •2.5.4 Midface Fractures
- •References
- •3 Classification of Craniofacial Fractures
- •3.1 Frontobasal: Frontofacial Fractures
- •3.1.1.1 Type 1
- •3.1.1.2 Type 2
- •3.1.1.3 Type 3
- •3.1.1.4 Type 4
- •3.2 Midface Fractures
- •3.2.1 Standard Classifications
- •3.2.2 Central Midface Fractures
- •3.2.3 Centrolateral Midface Fractures
- •3.2.4 Skull Base and Fracture Levels in the Region of the Septum
- •3.2.5 Lateral Midface Fractures
- •3.2.6 Midface: Combined Fractures
- •3.2.8 Cranio-Frontal Fractures
- •3.3. Craniofacial Fractures
- •3.3.1 Skull Base-Related Classification
- •3.3.2 Subcranial Facial Fractures
- •3.3.3 Craniofacial Fractures
- •3.3.4 Central Cranio-Frontal Fractures
- •3.3.5 Lateral Cranio-Orbital Fractures
- •References
- •4 Mechanisms of Craniofacial Fractures
- •4.1 Fractures of the Skull Base
- •4.1.1 Burst Fractures
- •4.1.2 Bending Fractures
- •4.2 Frontofacial: Frontobasal Fractures
- •4.2.1 Fracture Mechanism
- •4.3 Midfacial: Frontobasal Fractures
- •4.3.1 Trauma Factors
- •4.3.2 Impact Forces and Vectors
- •4.3.3.1 Degrees of Absorption
- •4.3.4 Impact Surface
- •4.3.4.1 Small Impact Surface
- •4.3.4.2 Large Impact Surface
- •4.3.5 Position of the Skull
- •4.3.5.1 Proclination
- •4.3.5.2 Reclination
- •References
- •5.1 Epidemiology
- •5.2.1 Frequency
- •5.2.2 Localization
- •5.3 Midface: Skull Base Fractures
- •5.3.2 Dural Injuries
- •5.3.2.1 Frequency
- •5.3.2.2 Localization
- •5.4 Cranio-Fronto-Ethmoidal Fractures
- •5.4.1 Frontal Sinus: Midface Fractures
- •5.5 Distribution According to Age
- •5.6 Distribution According to Gender
- •5.7 Associated Injuries
- •5.7.2 Eye Injuries
- •5.7.3 Facial Soft-Tissue Injuries
- •5.8 Special Fractures and Complications
- •5.8.1 Penetrating Injuries
- •5.8.3 Complicating Effects
- •5.8.3.1 Nose: Nasal Septum – Nasolacrimal Duct
- •5.8.3.2 Orbit
- •5.8.3.3 Ethmoid
- •References
- •6 Craniofacial Fracture Symptoms
- •6.1.1.1 Liquorrhea
- •Fistulas
- •Multiplicity
- •Time of Manifestation
- •Clinical Evidence of Liquorrhea
- •Chemical Liquor Diagnostic
- •Glucose-Protein Test
- •Immunological Liquor Diagnostic
- •Beta-2 Transferrin Determination
- •Beta-Trace Protein
- •Liquor Marking Methods
- •6.1.1.2 Pneumatocephalus
- •6.1.1.3 Meningitis
- •6.1.2.1 Lesions of the Cranial Nerves
- •Olfactory Nerves
- •Oculomotor Nerve
- •Trochlear Nerve
- •Abducent Nerve
- •Optic Nerve
- •Loss of Vision in Midface Fractures
- •Location of Optic Nerve Lesions
- •Clinical Appearance
- •Primary CT Signs
- •Secondary CT Signs
- •Additional Injuries
- •Operating Indications/Decompression
- •Decompression of the Orbital Cavity
- •Decompression of the Optic Canal
- •Therapy/Prognosis
- •6.1.2.2 Injuries at the Cranio-Orbital Junction
- •Frequency
- •Superior Orbital Fissure Syndrome (SOFS)
- •The Complete SOFS
- •Incomplete SOFS
- •Hemorrhagic Compression Syndrome (HCS)
- •Orbital Apex Syndrome (OAS)
- •Clivus Syndrome
- •6.1.2.3 Vascular Injuries in Skull Base Trauma
- •Cavernous Sinus Syndrome
- •Thrombosis of the Superior Ophthalmic Vein
- •6.1.3.2 Hemorrhage in the Skull Base Region
- •Basal Mucosal Hemorrhage
- •Hemorrhage in Frontal Skull Base Fractures
- •6.3.1.1 Emphysema
- •Orbital Emphysema
- •6.2 Midface Injuries (Clinical Signs)
- •6.2.1 Central Midface Fractures without Abnormal Occlusion (NOE Fractures)
- •6.2.2 Central Midface Fractures with Abnormal Occlusion (Le Fort I and II)
- •6.2.4 Lateral Midface Fractures
- •6.3 Orbital Injuries
- •6.3.1 Orbital Soft-Tissue Injuries
- •6.3.1.1 Minor Eye Injury
- •6.3.1.2 Nonperforating Injury of the Globe
- •6.3.1.3 Perforating Injury of the Globe (2%)
- •6.3.2 Orbital Wall Fractures
- •6.3.2.1 Fracture Frequency
- •6.3.3 Fracture Localization
- •6.3.3.1 Orbital Floor Fractures
- •6.3.3.2 Medial Orbital Wall Fractures
- •6.3.3.4 Multiple Wall Fractures
- •6.3.4 Fracture Signs
- •6.3.4.1 Clinical Manifestations
- •6.3.4.2 Change in Globe Position
- •6.3.4.3 Enophthalmus
- •6.3.4.4 Exophthalmus
- •6.3.4.5 Vertical Displacement of the Globe
- •6.3.4.7 Retraction Syndrome
- •6.3.4.8 Disturbances of Eye Motility
- •References
- •7.1 Intracranial Injuries
- •7.2 Management of Skull Base and Dural Injury
- •7.2.1 Skullbase Fractures with CSF Leakage
- •7.2.2 Skullbase Fractures with CSF Leak without Severe TBI
- •7.2.3 Skullbase Fractures with CSF Leak with Severe TBI
- •7.2.4.1 Skullbase Fractures with Spontaneously Ceased CSF Leakage
- •References
- •8 Surgical Repair of Craniofacial Fractures
- •8.1 Indications for Surgery
- •8.1.2 Semi-Elective Surgery for Frontobasal and Midface Fractures
- •8.1.3 No Surgical Indication
- •8.2 Surgical Timing
- •8.2.1 Evaluation
- •8.2.1.1 Neurosurgical Aspects
- •8.2.1.2 Maxillofacial Surgical Aspects
- •8.2.2 Surgical Timing
- •8.2.2.3 Elective Primary Treatment
- •8.2.2.4 Delayed Primary Treatment
- •8.2.2.5 Secondary Treatment
- •8.3 Surgical Approaches
- •8.3.1 Strategy for Interdisciplinary Approach (Decision Criteria)
- •8.3.1.2 Approach Strategy: Transfacial-Frontoorbital or Transfrontal-Subcranial
- •8.4.1 Indications
- •8.4.2.1 Coronal Approach
- •8.4.2.2 Osteoplastic Craniotomy
- •8.4.2.3 Skull Base Exposition
- •Technical Aspects
- •Technical Aspects
- •8.5 Transfrontal-Subcranial Approach
- •8.5.1 Indications
- •8.5.2 Surgical Principle
- •8.5.3 Subcranial Surgical Technique
- •8.6 Transfacial Approach
- •8.6.1 Indications
- •8.6.2 Surgical Principle
- •8.6.4.1 Frontal Sinus
- •8.6.4.2 Ethmoid/Cribriform Plate
- •8.6.4.3 Sphenoid
- •8.7 Endonasal-Endoscopical Approach
- •8.7.2 Sphenoid Fractures
- •References
- •9.1 Principles of Dural Reconstruction
- •9.2 Dural Substitutes
- •9.2.1 Autogenous Grafts
- •9.2.2 Allogeneic Transplants
- •9.2.2.1 Lyophilized Dura
- •9.2.2.2 Collagenous Compounds
- •9.3 Principles of Skull Base Reconstruction
- •9.3.1 Debridement of the Ethmoid Cells
- •9.3.3 Skull Base Repair
- •9.3.3.1 Extradural Skull Base Repair
- •9.3.3.2 Intradural Skull Base Occlusion
- •9.4 Skull Base Treatment/Own Statistics
- •References
- •10 Bone Grafts
- •10.1 Indications
- •10.1.1 Midface
- •10.2 Autogenous Bone Grafts
- •10.2.1 Split Calvarial Grafts
- •10.2.2 Bone Dust/Bone Chips
- •10.2.3 Autogenous Grafts from the Iliac Crest
- •References
- •11 Osteosynthesis of Craniofacial Fractures
- •11.1 Biomechanics: Facial Skeleton
- •11.3 Osteosynthesis of the Midface
- •11.3.1 Plating Systems
- •11.3.2 Miniplates: Microplates
- •11.3.3 Screw Systems
- •11.4 Surgical Procedure: Osteosynthesis of the Midface
- •11.4.1 Different Plate Sizes: Indication
- •11.4.2 Fracture-Related Osteosynthesis
- •11.4.2.1 Surgical Approaches
- •11.4.2.2 Lateral Midface Fractures
- •11.4.2.4 Complex Midfacial Fractures
- •11.5.1 Mesh-Systems
- •11.5.2 Indications and Advantages
- •References
- •References
- •12.1 Craniofacial Fractures
- •12.1.1 Concept of Reconstruction
- •12.1.5 Own Procedure: Statistics
- •12.2 NOE Fractures
- •12.3.1 Concept of Reconstruction
- •12.4 Zygomatico-Orbito-Cranial Fractures
- •12.5 Craniofrontal Fractures (CCF)
- •12.5.1 Concept of Reconstruction
- •12.5.6 Fractures of the Frontal Sinus with Comminution of the Infundibulum
- •12.6 Own Statistics
- •13.1 Infections and Abscesses
- •13.2 Osteomyelitis
- •13.3 Recurrent Liquorrhea
- •13.4 Hematoma: Central Edema
- •13.5 Subdural Hygroma
- •13.6 Frontal Sinus: Complications
- •13.7 Functional Neurological Deficits
- •13.8 Meningitis
- •13.9 Facial Contour Irregularities
- •13.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1.1 Autogenous Grafts
- •14.1.1.1 Split Calvarial Grafts
- •14.1.1.2 Cartilage Grafts
- •14.1.3.1 Synthetic Calcium Phosphates
- •14.1.3.2 Synthetic Polymers
- •14.1.4 Titanium-Mesh
- •References
- •15.1 Overall Objective
- •15.2 Patient-Related Conditions
- •15.2.1 Size and Location of the Defect
- •15.2.1.1 Examples
- •15.2.2 General Health Status
- •15.2.3 Neurological Status
- •15.2.4 Patient’s Wish
- •15.2.5 Treatment Plan
- •15.2.6 Technical Aspects
- •15.3 New Developments
- •15.3 1.1 The SLM process
- •15.3.2 PEEK-Implants
- •15.3.3 Outlook
- •References
- •Index
2.5 Diagnostic Algorithm |
|
25 |
||
|
|
|
||
Table 2.2 Radiological findings in trauma CT |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
Epidural hematoma |
Compressed tentorial and basal cisterns |
|||
Lens shaped between dura and tabula interna |
Compressed fourth ventricle (if hemorrhage is in the posterior |
|||
Usually stops at skull sutures |
|
fossa) |
||
Requires surgery dependent on size |
Hydrocephalus (when the fourth ventricle is compressed) |
|||
Subdural hematoma |
Brain swelling |
|||
Crescent-shaped |
|
Compressed external CSF spaces over the swollen brain |
||
Along the cranial vault |
|
parenchymal area |
||
Along the falx |
|
Narrow ipsilateral ventricle |
||
Along the tentorium |
Mid-line displacement |
|||
Exceeds the skull sutures |
Asymmetry of the tentorial cisterns |
|||
Requires surgery dependent on size |
Signs of increased ICP |
|||
|
|
|||
Traumatic SAH |
|
Compression of external CSF spaces |
||
Blood in the external CSF spaces (sulci or basal cisterns) |
Narrowed ventricles |
|||
Traumatic SAH is common in severe cranio-cerebral injuries |
Compression of the tentorial and basal cisterns: Ambiens |
|||
Clinical significance is low |
|
cistern (lateral to the midbrain) and quadrigeminal cistern |
||
Nontraumatic SAH |
|
|
(dorsal to the quadrigeminal lamina) |
|
|
Foramen magnum filled out with brain parenchyma (cerebellar |
|||
In each SAH: should think about the possibility of a ruptured |
||||
|
tonsils) |
|||
cerebral artery aneurysm. A rupture may be the cause for |
|
|||
|
|
|||
the trauma. Check the trauma history |
Intracranial air (pneumatocele, pneumatocephalus) |
|||
If there is a suspicion of an aneursysm, perform an Angio-CT |
Open brain injury |
|||
and discuss cerebral angiography |
Indicates dural laceration |
|||
Parenchymal hemorrhage (contusional hemorrhage) |
Indicates fracture of temporal bone at the skull base |
|||
Common in mid-severe and severe cerebral trauma |
Look for: |
|||
At surface and on the poles of the brain |
Frontal skull base fracture |
|||
May “bloom up” |
|
|
Sphenoid sinus fracture |
|
Require additional CT scan (within next 24 h) |
|
Mastoid fracture |
||
May be accompanied by brain swelling and require |
|
Temporal bone fracture |
||
decompression |
surgery |
Foreign bodies |
||
|
|
|||
Signs of space occupying hemorrhage |
|
Following penetration injuries |
||
Compressed external CSF spaces on the side of the |
Glass: Most often superficial in skin |
|||
hemorrhage |
|
Wood: Difficult to detect, because of appearance like air/ |
||
Compresssed lateral ventricle on the hemorrhage side |
|
emphysema |
||
Displacement of the midline to the contralateral side |
Metal: May cause artifacts |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
•Mandible
•Temporal bone and mastoid
The second step is to define dislocations: impressions, overlaps, and malalignments of the relevant structures. In the CT analysis, one should check the following (Table 2.2, Fig. 2.16):
•Skull contours
•Nasion
•Supraorbital margin
•Infraorbital margin
•Lateral orbital wall
•Zygoma
•Zytomatic arch
•Anterior nasal spine
2.5.3 Skull Base Fractures
There is a high coincidence of midface fractures and skull base fractures. The skull base is mostly affected in the frontobasal and fronto-ethmoidal regions.
•The high coincidence of facial skeletal fractures and frontobasal and fronto-ethmoidal injuries in midfacial traumas requires a CT scan to evaluate the skull base (Joss et al. 2001; Bowley 2003).
Fracture of the skull base can be the direct extension of skull fractures or orbital fractures into the skull base. For example, a temporal bone fracture can extend into the temporal skull base; a frontal bone fracture can radiate into the orbital roof, ethmoid and sphenoid; or
26 |
2 Radiology of Craniofacial Fractures |
|
|
Craniocerebral trauma
History
Course of accident
Unconsciousness
Vertigo
Vomitting
Conscious behaviour / GCS / Amnesia |
Haziness / Unconsciousness / GCS |
Clinic
Pupils
Reaction to light
Reaction to pain
Neurology
Normal |
Pathological |
X-Ray: AP and lateral view of the skull
Fractures? |
CT (axial/coronal) |
Intracranial air ?
Increased intracranial pressure?
Cerebral edema?
Space consuming hemorrhage?
Compression fracture?
Foreign body?
Cerebral pressure monitoring
Surgical decompression
Fig. 2.16 Radiological – diagnostic procedure in craniocerebral trauma – flow chart
an occipital fracture can radiate down into the foramen magnum. Anterior head trauma can result in complex fractures of the frontal skull base and ethmoid bone and may extend into the roof of the sphenoid sinus, the clivus and the sella. Temporal bone fractures can radiate into the petrous bone and mastoid process and
cause hemorrhage in the mastoid cells and tympanon. Clinical symptoms are otic hemorrhage, otic liquorrhea and hearing loss.
Another mechanism leading to skull base fractures is the indirect energy transmission from the mid-face to the skull base through the main vertical pillars. This
2.5 Diagnostic Algorithm |
27 |
|
|
Skull base fractures
History - Clinic
Definite signs |
Questionable signs |
|
CT |
|
CT |
Frontal sinus - axial 2 mm |
Rhinoliquorrhea ? |
|
Ethmoid bone - coronal 2 mm |
B - Transferrin + |
|
Sphenoid bone - axial 4 mm |
Na – Fluoreszin + |
|
|
JonotrastLiquorscintigraphy + |
|
|
|
Pneumocephalus |
Neurosurgical Revision |
CT |
Fracture gap >3 mm |
|
|
Dislocated base fractures |
|
|
Fig. 2.17 Radiological – diagnostic procedure in skull base fractures – flow chart
mainly affects the temporal skull base and the ethmoid. Not associated with mid-face fractures are skull base fractures after axial head trauma from the vertex with fractures in the region of the foramen magnum and the risk of a burst fracture of the first cervical vertebra (atlas ring burst fracture).
There are direct and indirect signs of skull base fractures. Direct signs are fracture lines, fracture gaps and steps between fragments. Indirect signs are intracranial air collections and liquorrhea. Intracranial air collections can be demonstrated in 25–30% of skull base fractures (Probst and Tomaschett 1990). Small air collections are regularly seen with fractures of the temporal bone and sphenoid sinus. Vast air collections (pneumocephalus) occur after destructive fractures of the frontal sinus and ethmoid roof. In the CT dataset, the primary axial images are most helpful to detect skull base fractures and must be analyzed thoroughly. To exclude undisplaced skull base fractures, MPR is required. MPR is also required for analysis of the extent of displacement of skull base fractures. Coronal images should be routinely reconstructed from the axial image set by the CT technician’s team (Fig. 2.17).
2.5.4 Midface Fractures
For midface fractures, CT images in the axial and coronal planes are obligatory to differentiate fracture types and to define the extent of the fracture. The sagittal plane may be helpful to assess dislocations in the anterior-posterior direction (nasion, maxilla). Oblique sagittal images parallel to the optic nerve or parallel to the inferior rectus muscle of the orbit may be helpful to visualize muscle entrapment in fractures of the orbital floor. The required series of images should be generated by the CT technician. In addition, analysis can be done interactively in a PACS viewer, if available.
CT permits a differentiated fracture assessment and provides evidence of injury in anatomically difficult areas, e.g., the orbits, the naso-orbito-ethmoidal complex, the periand retroorbital skull base and the retromaxillary region (Terrier et al. 1984; Schwenzer and Pfeifer 1987; Schneider and Tölly 1984; Manson et al. 1990; Whitaker et al. 1998; Rother 2000).
Classification of midface fractures, according to the classification systems outlined in Chap. 3, surgical planning and intraoperative navigation are based on CT.
