Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Учебные материалы / Color Atlas of Ophthalmology The Quick-Reference Manual for Diagnosis and Treatment

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
10.7 Mб
Скачать

16 Contact Lenses 451

as a cut an eou s basoph ilic hypersen sit ivit y to surface protein s. It is con sidered th at th e com bin at ion of th e irritat ive m ech an ics in du ced by surface deposit s as w ell as th e an t igen ic respon se of th e den at u red surface protein s w ith in th e dep osits lead to th e in flam m ator y resp on se an d th e developm en t of th e papillae. Mech an ical irrit at ion of th e conju n ct iva n ot on ly occu rs w ith con t act len ses bu t can also occur in isolated areas associated w ith su t u res. Also, th e in t roduct ion of silicon e hydrogel con t act len s m aterials, an d th e related con t in u ou s w ear, h as given a rebirth to an in creasing in ciden ce of CLPC. Th is is related to a h igh er m odulus of elast icit y (1.1 to 1.2 m egapascals) m aking th e len s st iffer th an hydrogel len ses. Th e rigidit y of th e m aterial en courages m ech an ical irrit at ion by ru bbing again st th e su perior palp ebral conju n ct iva, producing a local respon se.

Papillae are m orph ologically differen t from follicles an d less severe com pared w ith an acu te, hypersen sit ive follicu lar or cobbleston e ap pearan ce of a vern al con - jun ct ivit is. GPC or CLPC is best obser ved using a w h ite, diffuse ligh t on low m ag- n ificat ion . Papillae, w h ich are space-occu pying elevat ion s, w ill ten d to grab th e len s u pon th e blin k an d h old it in a sligh tly su perior, decen tered posit ion w h ile im peding th e dow nw ard t ran slat ion of th e len s. Because of th e con stan t irrit at ion of th e palpebral conju n ct iva, a react ive m u cous disch arge w ill in crease, leading to addit ion al len s su rface deposit ing.

Th e palpebral conju n ct iva can be described as sm ooth or sat in , un iform or n on - un iform . Un der low m agn ificat ion , w ith or w ith ou t NaFl stain ing, a variable level of hyp erem ia w ill appear w ith an in creasing degree of edem a. Th e papillae w ill be of var ying sizes, from 0.5 m m an d greater. With th e in st illat ion of NaFl, dist in ct crevices can be visu alized bet w een each papillae, w h ich w ill assist in th e delin ea- t ion of th e severit y of th e pap illar y react ion .

In th e earliest stages th e pat ien t is gen erally asym ptom at ic yet com plain s of frequ en t deposit ing of len ses an d variable vision . As th e con dit ion progresses, th e pat ien t st ar t s to fin d th at clean ing th e len ses becom es som ew h at fu t ile, an d th ere is a sligh t to m ore puru len t m ucou s disch arge. Th is m ay or m ay n ot be sym m et ric to both eyes an d is often bilateral, asym m et ric in presen tat ion . As th e disch arge an d th e vision depreciate, so does th e pat ien t’s len s-w earing t im e. Th e pat ien t w ill also fin d th at th e len s ten ds to decen ter sign ifican tly an d m ay even com plain of a greater len s aw aren ess. Most often th e pat ien t w ill presen t w ith a self-diagn osis of a “com m on conjun ct ivit is or red eye” an d m ay h ave self-t reated w ith over-th e- cou n ter vasocon st rict ive agen ts or been t reated by th e prim ar y care physician for a “garden variet y” bacterial conjun ct ivit is w ith out respon se to an t ibiot ics. Th ere m ay be som e ten dern ess to t act ile m an ipulat ion of th e lid bu t n o sign ifican t pain , n or do system ic sym ptom s suggest bacterial or viral conju n ct ivit is.

CLPC can be st aged in to four levels of severit y. Stage 1 dem on st rates n o an a- tom ical sign s, an d on ly m in or sym ptom s of m u cous disch arge an d itch ing. Stage 2 exh ibit s p apillar y en largem en t to 0.5 m m but less th an 1 m m , m ucou s st rain s, hyperem ia, an d an in crease in len s deposits. Th e pat ien t w ill describe itch in ess, disch arge, len s aw aren ess, an d blu rred acu it y. Stage 3 sh ow s papillae greater th an 1 m m , in creased m u cu s, len s aw aren ess, hyperem ia, edem a, an d len s decen t rat ion su periorly. Th e pat ien t w ill describe m oderate to severe sym ptom s w ith decreased w ear t im e, frequ en t len s deposit ing, an d in creased len s m ovem en t an d blu r. Stage 4 dem on st rates pap illae larger th an 1 m m , w h ich h ave a m u sh room sh ape accom - pan ied by severe sym ptom s an d sign s (Fig. 16.2).

452 Color Atlas of Ophthalm ology

A B

C

D

E

Fig. 16.2 (A) Papillary formation right eye (ocular dextrose, OD). (B) Nonpapillary satin left eye (ocular sinistras, OS). (C) Grade 1 contact lens–induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) marginal papillary formation with hyperemia Pre -Tx OD. (D) Grade 3 CLPC with isolated giant papillary formation with hyperemia Pre -Tx OS. (E) Grade 1 CLPC with hyperem ia post-Tx OD 2 weeks: significant decrease in hyperemia and early papillary formation.

16 Contact Lenses 453

F

G

Fig . 16.2 (Continued) (F) Grade 3 CLPC with hyperemia post-Tx OS 2 weeks: significant decrease in hyperem ia and early papillary form ation. (G) Zonal diagram of the superior everted lid.

Differential Diagnosis

Involves iden t ifying th e un derlying cu lprit of m ech an ics, protein den at urat ion , an t igen ic-related respon se, or environ m en t al in flu en ces giving rise to sim ilar fin d - ings an d sym ptom s exacerbated by th e use of con t act len ses, yet th ey are n ot th e cau se. By h istor y alon e, th e et iology an d differen t ial can be m ade. If th ere is hydrogel con tact len s w ear, exten ded m ore th an daily; if th ere is a h istor y of cat aract or corn eal procedures w ith su t u res; or if th e pat ien t h as a sign ifican t h istor y of season al or vern al allergy, th e h istor y is th e t ru e stor y. Treat m en t w ill th us follow th e scen ario of th e h istor y.

CLPC m ay also presen t w ith sim ilar sym ptom s t ypical of a variet y of conjun ct i- vit is, in cluding bacterial, viral, vern al, atopic, or m ech an ically in du ced by su t u res postoperat ively. Th e h allm ark differen t ial of CLPC is a m ore rapid on set w ith in - creased m u cous disch arge an d th e in abilit y to properly m ain tain th e con t act len s on th e eye, u su ally exh ibited by excessive len s m ovem en t du e to th e m ech an ical in fluen ce of th e en larged pappilae. Follicles of variable size are seen in a hyperem ic conjun ct iva, in ferior m ore so th an sup erior (un like CLPC seen in th e su perior palp ebral conju n ct iva) w ith t ran slu cen t , avascular fluid–lym p h oid accu m ulat ion an d are accom pan ied by system ic fin dings as in ph ar yngoconjun ct ival fever (PCF) or epidem ic keratoconjun ct ivit is (EKC), as w ell as ru ling out ch lam ydial disease. Th e Academ y of Op h th alm ology h as presen ted an excellen t differen t ial form at for conju n ct ivit is as seen in Table 16.3.

454 Color Atlas of Ophthalm ology

Table 16.3 Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

Type of Co njunctivitis

Clinical Signs

 

 

Allergic/immunologic

 

 

 

Seasonal allergic

Bilateral; conjunctival injection, chem osis, watery

 

 

discharge, mild m ucous discharge

 

Vernal

Bilateral; giant papillary hypertrophy of superior

 

 

tarsal conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctival injection,

 

 

conjunctival scarring, watery and mucoid discharge,

 

limbal Trantas dots, limbal “papillae,” corneal

 

 

epithelial erosions, corneal neovascularization and

 

 

scarring, corneal vernal plaque/shield ulcer

 

Atopic

Bilateral; eczematoid blepharitis; eyelid thickening,

 

 

scarring; lash loss; papillary hypertrophy of superior

 

and inferior tarsal conjunctiva; conjunctival scarring;

 

watery or mucoid discharge; boggy edem a; corneal

 

neovascularization, ulcers, and scarring; punctate

 

 

epithelial keratitis; keratoconus; subcapsular cataract

Giant papillary

Lateralit y associated with contact lens wear pat tern;

 

 

papillary hypertrophy of superior tarsal conjunctiva,

 

mucoid discharge; in severe cases: lid swelling, ptosis

Mechanical/irritative

 

 

 

Superior lim bic

Bilateral superior bulbar injection, laxit y, edem a, and

keratoconjunctivitis

keratinization; superior corneal punctate

 

(SLK)

epitheliopathy

laments

 

Contact lens-related SLK

Injection of superior bulbar conjunctiva, epithelial

 

 

thickening of limbus with neovascularization and/or

 

extension of conjunctival epithelium onto superior

 

cornea; papillary hypertrophy of tarsal conjunctivitis

 

is variable

 

 

Floppy eyelid syndrome

Upper eyelid edema; upper eyelid easily everted,

 

 

som etimes by simple elevation or lifting of

use

 

papillary reaction of superior tarsal conjunctiva;

 

 

punctate epithelial keratopathy; pannus; bilateral

 

 

often asym metric

 

 

Pediculosis palpebrarum

Unilateral or bilateral follicular conjunctivitis; adult lice

(Pthirus pubis)

at the base of the eyelashes, nits (eggs) adherent

 

 

to the eyelash shafts, blood-tinged debris on the

 

 

eyelashes and eyelids

 

Medication-induced

Lateralit y based on drug use; conjunctival injection,

 

keratoconjunctivitis

inferior fornix conjunctival follicles; distinctive signs:

 

contact dermatitis of eyelids with erythema, scaling

 

in some cases

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abrupt onset; unilateral or bilateral; varies in severit y; bulbar conjunctival injection, watery discharge, follicular reaction of inferior tarsal conjunctiva, chemosis
Distinctive signs: preauricular lymphadenopathy, petechial and subconjunctival hemorrhage, corneal epithelial defect, multifocal epithelial punctate keratitis evolving to anterior stromal keratitis, mem brane/pseudom em brane formation, eyelid ecchymosis
Unilateral: bulbar conjunctival injection, watery discharge, mild follicular reaction of conjunctiva; may have palpable preauricular node
Distinctive signs: vesicular rash or ulceration of eyelids, pleom orphic or dendritic epithelial keratitis of cornea or conjunctiva
Typically unilateral but can be bilateral: m ild to
severe follicular reaction, punctate epithelial keratitis; may have corneal pannus, especially if longstanding
Distinctive signs: single or multiple shiny, dom e -shaped umbilicated lesion(s) of the eyelid skin or margin
Unilateral: bulbar conjunctival injection, purulent or m ucopurulent discharge
Unilateral or bilateral: marked eyelid edem a, marked bulbar conjunctival injection, marked purulent discharge, preauricular lymphadenopathy
Important sign to detect: corneal ltrate
Unilateral or bilateral
Eyelid edema, bulbar conjunctival injection, discharge may be purulent or mucopurulent, no follicles
Bulbar conjunctival injection, follicular reaction of tarsal conjunctiva, mucoid discharge, corneal pannus, punctate epithelial keratitis, preauricular lymphadenopathy
Distinctive sign: bulbar conjunctival follicles Bilateral: bulbar conjunctival injection, papillary
conjunctival subepithelial
brosis and keratinization, conjunctival scarring beginning in the fornices, punctal stenosis and keratinization, progressive conjunctival shrinkage, symblepharon, entropion, trichiasis, corneal ulcers, neovascularization, and scarring

16 Contact Lenses 455

Table 16.3 (Continued) Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

Type of Co njunctivitis Clinical Signs

Viral

Adenoviral

Herpes simplex virus

Molluscum contagiosum

Bacterial

Nongonococcal

Gonococcal

Chlamydial

Neonate/infant

Adult

Immune -mediated

Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid

(continued on page 456)

456 Color Atlas of Ophthalm ology

Table 16.3 (Continued)

Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Typical Clinical Signs of Conjunctivitis

 

Type of Conjunctivitis

Clinical Signs

 

graft-versus-host

Bilateral; conjunctival injection, chemosis,

 

disease

pseudomembranous conjunctivitis,

 

 

keratoconjunctivitis sicca, superior lim bic

 

 

keratoconjunctivitis, cicatricial eyelid disease,

 

 

episcleritis, corneal epithelial sloughing, limbal stem

 

 

cell failure, calcareous corneal degeneration; rare

 

 

intraocular involvem ent

 

 

 

 

 

Neoplastic

 

 

 

Sebaceous gland

Unilateral: intense bulbar conjunctival injection,

 

carcinoma

conjunctival scarring; corneal epithelial invasion may

 

 

occur

 

 

Eyelids may exhibit a hard nodular, nonm obile mass

 

 

of the tarsal plate with yellowish discoloration; may

 

 

appear as a subconjunctival, m ultilobulated yellow

 

 

mass, may resem ble a chalazion

Note: Typical clinical signs m ay n ot be presen t in all cases. Dist inct ive signs are m ost useful in m aking a clinical diagn osis, but m ay occur un com m on ly. In all en t it ies, lateralit y m ay var y and m ay be asym m et rical.

Source: Matoba AY. Preferred Pract ice Pat tern s, Conjun ct ivit is. San Fran cisco: Am erican Academ y of Op h th alm ology; 2003. Available at: h t t p ://w w w .aao.org/aao/edu cat ion /librar y/p pp /u p load/ Conjun ct ivit is_.pdf. (Accessed 12–08–2008). Reprinted w ith perm ission .

Management

As w ith any poten t ial an t igen ic–allergic respon se, on e m u st first rem ove th e in i- t iat ing st im u lus. Th e sim p le rem oval an d discon t in u an ce of th e len s are th e easiest t reat m en t , bu t for som e pat ien ts th e m ost t rau m at ic. Th erefore a com bin at ion th erapy is suggested based on th e level of disease. It is im port an t to n ote th at th e use of vasocon st rict ive agen ts, an t ibiot ics, an d/or an t ivirals th at h ave been star ted prior to presen tat ion can be safely discon t in u ed . How ever, if th ere is con cern abou t bacterial coin fect ion , m ain t ain th e appropriate level of an t ibiot ics such as four th - gen erat ion fluoroquin olon e w h en involving con tact len s.

The m ost expedient treatm ent is the sim ple discontinuation of w earing contact lenses and converting to eyeglass w ear until the condition im proves. How ever, in m any cases, the patient m ay not have eyeglasses or m ay not be tolerant of the alternative. Therefore, the use of soft daily disposable lenses w ith a high m oisture content in conjunction w ith a steroidal antiinflam m atory serves as the best overall therapy.

Stage 1 CLPC requires m inim al intervention, such as refitting the patient w ith a frequent replacem ent or disposable lens. In this situation, the simple conversion to a “daily disposable–single use lens” is the m ost appropriate. Another option would be to continue conventional, disposable, or frequent replacem ent lenses but change the care product to a peroxide-based system and possibly add an enzym atic cleaning solution.

In an unpu blish ed st u dy by K. Dan iels, daily disposable len ses dem on st rated a m ore rapid resolu t ion of p at ien t sym ptom s w ith grade 2 to 4 CLPC w ith ou t th e u se of m edicin als follow ed by 1-w eek an d 2-w eek disposable len ses, respect ively. Th is suggest s th at th e sim ple u se of daily disposable–single use len ses m igh t be th e m ost appropriate single or adjuvan t t reat m en t for CLPC.

St age 2 CLPC requ ires len s replacem en t , frequen t irrigat ion w ith lu bricat ing drops to rid m ucus, lid hygien e to avoid lid w ipers epith eliopathy, an d possibly

16 Contact Lenses 457

a prescript ion for a m ast cell st abilizer such as such as lodoxam ide (Alom ide, Allergan , Ir vin e, CA), crom olyn (Crolom , Bausch & Lom b, Roch ester, NY) (Opt icrom , Allergan , Ir vin e, CA), n edocrom il (Alocril, Allergan ), pem irolast (Alam ast , Vist akon Ph arm aceu t icals, Jacksonville, FL), or olopatadin e (Pataday or Patan ol, Alcon Laboratories, For t Wor th , TX) for sh ort-term to ch ron ic th erapy.

Stage 3 CLPC requires a discontinuation of lenses for a short tim e w hile prescribing a m ast cell stabilizer or low -concentration steroid such as prednisolone 1%. Lenses can be refit to daily disposable or short-term frequent replacem ent lenses w ith peroxide care products until resolution of the papillae to a w hitened cap called hypertrophy.

St age 4 CLPC requires com plete discon t in u at ion of len ses an d m ore aggressive steroid in ter ven t ion u n t il resolu t ion . Up on resolut ion , frequ en t replacem en t or disposable len ses sh ould be fit ted u sing a peroxide-based product system .

In gen eral, w h en u t ilizing steroids for t reat m en t , it is h igh ly suggested to adju - vantly treat the patient w ith single-use daily disposable lenses, w hich w ill satisfy the patient’s needs w hile allow ing for a bandage lens–drug delivery efficiency. The steroid (prednisolone 1%) should be aggressively dosed for the first 1 to 2 w eeks at four tim es a day and then taper slow ly over the next 2 to 3 w eeks. As one tapers the prednisolone dow n to t w ice a day, start the addition of a soft steroid such as loteprednol either 1%or 0.2%for 1 to 2 weeks or until resolution of clinical findings. Long-term m aintenance is m ost appropriate w ith shorter-term , frequently replaced hydrogel lenses of 2 to 4 w eeks of nonionic, high -w ater-content m aterials and peroxide cleaning or a conversion to gas perm eable high Dk–plasm a-treated designs.

Also con sider th e long-term u se of an t ih ist am in e–m ast cell st abilizer for longterm m ain ten an ce. Addit ion ally, if on e w as to be con ser vat ive w ith long-term m e- dicin als, con sider t w ice-a-day to th ree-t im es-a-day u se of physiologically based w et t ing drops such as vit am in A drops (ViVa, Corn eal Scien ces, Gaith ersbu rg, MD) or elect rolyte-balan ced form ulas such as Th era–Tears (Advan ced Vision Research , Boston , MA) or Sooth e (Bau sch & Lom b, Roch ester, NY; Alm ira Scien ces, Atlan t a, GA). Th ere is also suggest ion th at cyclosporin e drops (Rest asis, Allergan , Ir vin e, CA) m ay also be h elpful in a t w ice-a-day dosage for long-term con t rol of ocular in flam - m ator y respon se as w ell as being a veh icle carrier h elpfu l in m ain tain ing a h ealthy ocu lar m ucin surface to avoid m ech an ical irritat ion from th e len s m aterial.

Vascularization

Vascularizat ion is con sidered to be th e gen eral form at ion an d exten sion of capillaries th at h ad n ot previously existed w ith in th e avascu lar corn ea. Neovasculariza- t ion is th e form at ion of n ew vessels as an exten sion or sh u n ts to preexist ing vascularized areas of th e avascular corn ea. To differen t iate fur th er is to classify form s of redn ess an d vascu larizat ion by locat ion . Lim bal engorgem en t or hyperem ia is th e disten sion of lim bal blood vessels in th e absen ce of n ew vessel grow th . Vessel ingrow th or pen et rat ion is n ot n eovascularizat ion , bu t sim ply an exten sion of a vessel inw ard tow ard th e cen t ral corn ea. Pan n u s, w h ich is h igh ly vascularized, is exten sion of conju n ct ival t issue overlapping th e clear avascular corn ea seen as an an atom ical varian ce or in duced by t rau m a to th e eye.

Ch ron ic hypoxia is th e u n derlying con dit ion th at in it iates th e vascu larizat ion respon se. Hypoxia cau ses lactate acidosis, w h ich decreases th e in tegrit y of th e epith elium an d st rom al soften ing. Th is yields an oppor t un it y for vessel ingrow th . Du e to hyp oxia, an early ph ase of vascu larizat ion occu rs in ducing a release of in flam - m ator y m ediators. Th is st im ulates addit ion al vessel grow th called an angiogenic response. Tigh t len ses, lim bal com pression , an d/or t rau m a m ay also st im ulate a

458 Color Atlas of Ophthalm ology

vascu lar respon se, w h ich w ill in crease th e release of in flam m ator y an d vasost im u - lator y m ediators. Th ere are several p ossibilit ies th at en cou rage vascu larizat ion un - der hypoxic con dit ion s: (1) vasost im u lat ion an d in flam m at ion , (2) t igh t len s syn - drom e, (3) lim bal-plexal com pression , (4) solut ion sen sit ivit y, an d (5) vasogen ic resp on se to t raum a (Fig. 16.3). Th e m ain cau ses of vascularizat ion associated w ith con tact len s w ear are t igh t len s (edge su ct ion ) cen t ral corn eal edem a (hyp oxia), solut ion toxicit y, m ech an ical abrasion , len s dam age an d m ech an ical st im u lu s associat ion w ith irrit at ion , surface dep osit ion , an d poorly fit t ing len ses.

A B

D E

G H

C

F

I

Fig . 16.3 (A) Limbal congestion–hyperemia. (B) Com bination of vasodilatation (corkscrew vessels)–vasoproliferation–vasolimbal congestion. (C) Severe lim bal vascularization congestion with early neovascularization. (D) Vessel penetration with early pannus. (E) 4+ superior lim bal neovascularization leading toward the central cornea and papillary zone encroachment. (F) Intracorneal hemorrhage from neovascularization post-LASIK on an extended-wear contact lens wearer. (G) Sectoral pannus associated with overwear. (H) Sectoral pannus with corneal decompensation.

(I) Sectoral pannus with corneal decompensation–placido topographic image.

16 Contact Lenses 459

Presentation

Vascular respon ses to ch ron ic hyp oxia can var y from m in or to severe based on th e associat ion w ith possible m icrobial in filt rat ion . Som e form of corn eal vascularizat ion occurs in ~34% of cases associated w ith hydrogel len s u se versu s 2% w ith n on len s w earers, w ith 98%of th e vascularizat ion occu rring w ith in th e superficial st rom a. Th e pat ien t is oth er w ise asym ptom at ic oth er th an n ot ing an apparen t hyperem ia or lim bal engorgem en t , w h ich app ears to th e pat ien t as a “ch ron ic red eye” w h en w earing con tact len ses. Th is is sim ply an engorgem en t of th e m argin al arcade capillaries. Th ese vessels h ave a st raigh t prot uberan ce w ith a defin ed loop at th e en d . Hyperem ic episcleral lim bal vessels are differen t iated from n eovessels th at exten d for w ard w ith leaflike fron ds th at in terdigitate.

Vascu larizat ion appears sim ilar to a m esh like plexal grow th in th e m idepith e- lium project ing tow ard th e corn ea like sm all, lin ear spikes an d bran ch es called fronds (sim ilar to th e vein s w ith in a leaf). Th ere is gen erally n o sym ptom atology associated w ith th e fin dings. Th ese are differen t iated from n orm al lim bal vessels th at “loop” back tow ard th e lim bu s. Low -grade (grade 1) vessels w ill ten d to m i- grate inw ard to approxim ately 0.4 to 0.6 m m (daily w ear) to 1.4 m m (exten ded w ear). Grade 2 w ill be grade 1 vessels th at w ill ten d to m igrate tow ard th e pupil w ith ou t p assing in to th e pupillar y zon e. Th e m ost severe, grade 3, w ill pen et rate th e pu pillar y region . It is im por tan t to ph otodocum en t th e vessels an d determ in e th e locat ion on th e lim bus, depth (su perficial or deep), degree of p en et rat ion , an d severit y defin ed as th e depth of pen et rat ion (an d th e advan cem en t of grow th to- w ard th e papillar y region ).

Differential Diagnosis

Vascularizat ion an d n eovascu larizat ion are differen t iated from lim bal vessels th at m ay be dilatated by t rau m a, in fect ion , in flam m at ion , t um or, conjun ct ival in - grow th or pter ygiu m , or postoperat ive com plicat ion . Differen t iat ion m ust also be m ade from vascu larized pan n us, w h ich is th e ingrow th of vessels an d con n ect ive w ith in th e epith eliu m . Th e differen t iat ion of vessel depth is im port an t . Su perficial vessels or vascularizat ion in it iates from th e lim bal capillar y arcade, an d th e vessels are m ore tor t u ou s an d of sm aller caliber th an deep st rom al vessels, w h ich em erge from w ith in th e lim bal m idst rom al region an d are larger in caliber, h ave abr upt en d bulbs, an d m ay disru pt th e regu larit y of th e lim bal corn ea. Oth er factors th at m ay be associated w ith con t act len s–related vascularizat ion are dr y eyes (keratoconjun ct ivit is sicca) or ocular su rface disease an d oth er diseases, su ch as bleph arit is, acn e rosacea, Sjögren syn drom e, an d im m u n e dysfun ct ion , as w ell as in terst it ial kerat it is, h erpes kerat it is, t u bercu losis, m easles, syph ilis, an d th e possibilit y of am in o acid deficien cies.

Because of th e p oten t ial of n on – con t act len s–related con cern s associated w ith corn eal vascularizat ion , biom icroscop ic exam sh ould in clude direct illu m in at ion an d ret roillu m in at ion , part icu larly of th e lim bal periph eral vessel arcades. In gen - eral, superficial vessels w ill em erge in to th e an terior st rom a an d appear as single or m ult ip le (pan n u s) tor t uous vessels un der low m agn ificat ion , yet deeper st rom al vessels course th rough th e corn ea as m ore lin ear vessels th at arborize. Lip id deposit ion appears as yellow -w h ite opacit ies at th e leading edge or surrou n ding th e st rom al vessels. Obser vat ion of lipid exu dates su rrou n ding an act ively engorged vessel(s) sh ould raise th e con cern of a possible iris-angle carcin om a requiring diligen t gon ioscopic exam in at ion . If th ere is a conju n ct ival grow th closely ju xt aposed to th e lim bu s adjacen t to th e corn eal vascularizat ion , conju n ct ival carcin om a m ay be suspected .

460 Color Atlas of Ophthalm ology

Management

Th e pat ien t w ith lim bal hyp erem ia or vessel engorgem en t ten ds to self-t reat w ith over-th e-cou n ter vasocon st rict ive agen t s. Th ese pat ien ts w ill fin ally presen t st ating th at even w ith th ese agen t s th eir len ses feel dr y an d th eir eyes are red . In th is sit u at ion , sim ply an d forcefu lly tell th e pat ien t to discon t in u e drops th at “get th e red ou t .” Th ese drop s ten d to yield reboun d congest ion as w ell as a m ild m ydriasis an d slow ing of accom m odat ion du e to th e sym path om im et ic effects. In th is sit u - at ion , it is best to discon t in u e th e len ses for a sh or t period —2 to 3 days—an d prescribe a soft steroid to rid any low -level in flam m ator y com pon en t s.

In conju n ct ion , im plem en t physiologically based w et t ing drops su ch as vit am in A (ViVA, Corn eal Scien ces, Gaith ersbu rg, MD), Th era-Tears (Advan ced Vision Research , Boston , MA), Bion Tears (Alcon Laboratories, For t Wor th , TX), or Sooth e (Bau sch & Lom b, Roch ester, NY, Alm ira Scien ces, Atlan ta, GA). In addit ion to topical su pplem en t at ion , con sider th e u se of om ega 3-6 com bin at ion s for th eir in h eren t an t iin flam m ator y an d m u cin com plem en tar y abilit ies. Also, on e sh ou ld con sider agen ts su ch as Syst an e (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Wor th , TX) or En dura (Allergan , Ir vin e, TX) for topical su rface t reat m en t .

After th e discon t in uan ce of th e con tact len s u se an d after vessel regression , th ere w ill be gh ost vessels or ch an n els th at develop . Th ese m u st be w ell docu - m en ted to differen t iate th en from gh ost vessels th at m ay be associated w ith an in terst it ial kerat it is.

On ce th e lim bal hyperem ia is ten ded to, a refit to con tact len ses sh ou ld be com - pleted w ith th e ph ilosophy of h igh w etabilit y, m oderate m odu lu s, an d h igh oxygen perm eabilit y. Th e pat ien t can be refit to n on ion ic, h igh -w ater-con ten t hydrogel, silicon e hydrogel of a low er m odu lu s. If th e m odu lus is h igh , th ere ten ds to be st iff- n ess to th e len s th at can in du ce conju n ct ival irritat ion an d repeat of conju n ct ival hyperem ia. In addit ion , on e sh ou ld con sider a h igh diffu sion coefficien t of a rigid gas p erm eable len s w ith su fficien t axial edge clearan ce to en h an ce th e flu id–tear ch an n el an d avoid corn eal an d lim bal edge in flu en ces. Th ese len ses sh ould also in - corporate an app ropriate plasm a t reat m en t for w et abilit y. Care produ cts an d len s sch edu les sh ould be revisited, an d pat ien t educat ion n eeds to be com preh en sive.

In th e even t of m ore pron ou n ced an d progressive vascu larizat ion , such as n eovascu larizat ion , on e m u st be con cern ed abou t th e fragilit y of th ese vessels.

It is n ot un com m on to obser ve an in t racorn eal h em orrh age as a direct sequ ela of n eovascu larizat ion . If a h em orrh age occu rs, it w ill app ear as a “red spot on th e corn ea” sim ilar to a “petech ial conjun ct ival h em orrh age” located at th e proxim al en d of a vascular fron d . Th ese h em orrh ages sh ould be ph otograph ed an d m on i- tored for spread . Th e pat ien t sh ou ld refrain from any agen t th at h as an an t icoagu - lan t effect su ch as aspirin , Plavix, w arfarin , as w ell as n eut raceu t icals th at h ave an an t ith rom bot ic ch aracter. Addit ion ally, th ese n eed to be w ell docum en ted as w ell as th e n eovascu larizat ion in th e even t th e pat ien t decides to pursu e in t racorn eal refract ive surgical procedu res in w h ich in t raoperat ive corn eal h em orrh age could be sign ifican t .

Essen t ially, th e t reat m en t for any vascular respon se w ith in th e corn ea from con - tact len ses is th e sam e, an d th e varian ce is th e un derlying cau se an d in ter ven t ion . On ce th e pat ien t h as been properly refit , edu cat ion an d m on itoring are th e keys to avoidan ce of recu rren ce. Addit ion ally, as part of th e t reat m en t gu idelin e, on e m ust clin ically m on itor for issu es th at m ay in duce ocu lar irrit at ion an d vascu larizat ion oth er th an con t act len ses, such as acn e rosacea, system ic m edicat ion s, an d con - dit ion s th at in clu de con n ect ive t issu e disorders, autoim m u n e an d in flam m ator y disease, im m u n ocom prom ised disorders, vascular st im u lator y disease su ch as kid - n ey problem s an d diabetes, keratoconjun ct ivit is sicca, an d associated h orm on ally related disorders of th e eye, as w ell as environ m en tal irritan t s, use of diu ret ics (m edicin al or as beverage–alcoh ol an d caffein e), an d sm oking.