Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Visual Fields Examination and Interpretation_Walsh_2011
.pdfThis page intentionally left blank
Contents
Contributors |
xvii |
||
A History of Perimetry |
xix |
||
Chapter 1. Overview of Perimetry |
3 |
||
Thomas J. Walsh, MD |
|
||
1-1 |
Overview of Perimetry |
3 |
|
|
1-1-1 |
Peripheral Fields |
5 |
|
1-1-2 |
Central Fields |
6 |
|
1-1-3 |
Physiologic Blind Spot |
7 |
|
1-1-4 |
Recording the Fields |
7 |
1-2 |
Structure of the Visual Pathway |
12 |
|
1-3 |
Interpretation of Defects in the Fields |
16 |
|
1-4 |
Techniques of Field Testing |
21 |
|
|
1-4-1 |
Confrontation Technique |
21 |
|
1-4-2 |
Central Field Technique |
24 |
|
1-4-3 |
Chamlin Step Technique |
31 |
|
1-4-4 |
Peripheral Field Technique |
34 |
|
1-4-5 |
Amsler Grid |
36 |
|
1-4-6 |
Color Testing |
36 |
xi
xii |
Contents |
|
|
|
Chapter 2. Anatomic Basis and Differential Diagnosis of |
|
|||
|
Field Defects |
41 |
||
|
Jonathan D. Wirtschafter, MD, and Thomas J. Walsh, MD |
|
||
|
2-1 Categories of Field Defects |
41 |
||
|
2-2 Overview of the Visual Pathway |
43 |
||
|
|
2-2-1 |
Occipital Lobe |
46 |
|
2-3 Monocular Field Defects |
48 |
||
|
|
2-3-1 |
Localized Defects |
48 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-1 Wedge-Shaped Temporal Field Defect |
48 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-2 Arcuate and Paracentral Field Defects |
52 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-3 Central Scotoma or Depression |
54 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-4 Enlarged Physiologic Blind Spot |
56 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-5 Centrocecal Scotoma or Depression |
57 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-6 Equatorial Annular Scotoma or Depression |
58 |
|
|
|
2-3-1-7 Altitudinal Hemianopia |
59 |
|
|
2-3-2 |
Generalized Defects |
59 |
|
|
|
2-3-2-1 Generalized Depression or Peripheral Contraction |
59 |
|
2-4 |
Binocular Field Defects |
60 |
|
|
|
2-4-1 Homonymous Hemianopias |
60 |
|
|
|
|
2-4-1-1 Complete: Macular Splitting |
60 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-2 Incomplete Congruous: Horizontal Sectoranopia |
62 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-3 Incomplete Congruous: Paramidline-Sparing Vertical |
63 |
|
|
|
Hemianopia |
|
|
|
|
2-4-1-4 Incomplete: Macular Sparing |
64 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-5 Incomplete: Two Scotomas |
64 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-6 Incomplete Incongruous |
65 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-7 Incomplete: Unilateral Sparing of Temporal Crescent |
66 |
|
|
|
2-4-1-8 Incomplete: Unilateral Defect of Temporal Crescent |
67 |
|
|
2-4-2 |
Bitemporal Hemianopias |
67 |
|
|
|
2-4-2-1 Complete |
67 |
|
|
|
2-4-2-2 With Central Depression, Scotomatous |
69 |
|
|
2-4-3 |
Binasal Field Defects |
70 |
|
|
|
2-4-3-1 Complete |
70 |
|
|
|
2-4-3-2 Incomplete |
71 |
|
|
2-4-4 Altitudinal Field Defects |
72 |
|
|
|
|
2-4-4-1 Noncongruous Binocular and Monocular |
72 |
|
|
|
2-4-4-2 Congruous |
73 |
|
|
2-4-5 Quadrantanopias |
75 |
|
|
|
|
2-4-5-1 Superior Homonymous, Incomplete |
75 |
|
|
|
2-4-5-2 Inferior Homonymous, Complete |
76 |
|
|
2-4-6 |
Bilateral Central Field Defects |
77 |
|
|
|
2-4-6-1 Scotoma or Depression |
77 |
|
|
2-4-7 |
Bilateral Peripheral Field Defects |
78 |
|
|
|
2-4-7-1 Generalized Depression or Peripheral Contraction |
78 |
|
|
2-4-8 |
Bilateral Checkerboard Scotomas |
79 |
|
|
2-4-9 |
Bilateral Homonymous Hemianopias |
80 |
|
2-5 |
Junctional Field Defects |
80 |
|
|
|
2-5-1 |
Complete Monocular Plus Incomplete Contralateral Ocular |
80 |
|
|
2-5-2 Homonymous Hemianopia Plus |
81 |
|
|
|
2-5-3 |
Bitemporal Hemianopia Plus |
83 |
|
|
Contents |
xiii |
Chapter 3. Essentials of Automated Perimetry |
85 |
||
George Shafranov, MD |
|
||
3-1 |
Introduction |
85 |
|
3-2 Historical Overview |
85 |
||
3-3 |
Principles of Field Testing |
86 |
|
|
3-3-1 |
Kinetic Perimetry |
88 |
|
3-3-2 |
Static Perimetry |
90 |
|
|
3-3-2-1 Suprathreshold Techniques |
90 |
|
|
3-3-2-2 Threshold Techniques |
92 |
|
3-3-3 |
Frequency-of-Seeing Curves and Fluctuations |
92 |
3-4 Test Selection and Algorithms |
94 |
||
|
3-4-1 |
Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) |
94 |
|
3-4-2 |
Foveal Threshold |
95 |
|
3-4-3 |
Initial Values |
95 |
|
3-4-4 |
Fixation Monitoring |
96 |
|
3-4-5 |
Threshold Testing |
99 |
3-5 |
Single Test Printout |
99 |
|
|
3-5-1 |
Test Selection (and General Information) |
99 |
|
3-5-2 |
Reliability Indices |
99 |
|
3-5-3 |
Numeric Results and Grayscale Results (Raw Data) |
101 |
|
3-5-4 |
Total Deviation |
101 |
|
3-5-5 |
Pattern Deviation |
101 |
|
3-5-6 |
Glaucoma Hemifield Test |
102 |
|
3-5-7 |
Global Indices |
105 |
3-6 Custom Tests |
105 |
||
|
3-6-1 |
Grid Size |
108 |
|
3-6-4 FASTPAC |
108 |
|
|
3-6-5 |
Programs 30-1 and 24-1 |
109 |
|
3-6-6 |
Program 10-2 and Macula Test |
109 |
|
3-6-7 |
Peripheral 60 and 60-4 Program |
110 |
|
3-6-8 |
Nasal Step Program |
110 |
|
3-6-9 |
Stimulus Size Option |
111 |
3-7 Follow-up Printout |
111 |
||
|
3-7-1 |
Overview Printout |
111 |
|
3-7-2 |
Change Analysis Printout |
111 |
|
3-7-3 |
Glaucoma Progression Analysis Printout |
114 |
|
3-7-4 |
GPA-Guided Progression Analysis |
114 |
3-8 Visual Function Specific Perimetric Technologies |
114 |
||
|
3-8-1 |
Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP) |
117 |
|
3-8-2 |
Frequency Doubling Perimetry |
117 |
|
3-8-3 |
High-Pass Resolution Perimetry |
117 |
|
3-8-4 |
Tendency-Oriented Perimetry |
118 |
3-9 |
Learning Effect and Artifacts |
118 |
|
|
3-9-1 |
Miosis and Mydriasis |
118 |
|
3-9-2 |
Media Opacities |
119 |
|
3-9-3 |
Eyelid and Nose Effects |
119 |
|
3-9-4 |
Refractive Errors |
119 |
|
3-9-5 |
Corrective Lens/Frame Artifacts |
120 |
3-10 Role of the Visual Field Technician |
121 |
||
xiv |
Contents |
|
|
Chapter 4. Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma |
127 |
||
|
Hylton R. Mayer, MD, Marc L. Weitzman, MD, and |
|
|
|
Joseph Caprioli, MD |
|
|
|
4-1 Introduction |
127 |
|
|
4-2 Glaucomatous Field Loss |
127 |
|
|
4-3 Automated Perimetry Options |
129 |
|
|
4-4 Evaluation of a Single Test |
132 |
|
|
4-4-1 |
Patient Reliability |
132 |
|
|
4-4-1-1 Test Duration |
133 |
|
|
4-4-1-2 Fixation Losses |
133 |
|
|
4-4-1-3 False-Positive Responses |
133 |
|
|
4-4-1-4 False-Negative Responses |
136 |
|
|
4-4-1-5 Short-Term Fluctuation |
136 |
|
|
4-4-1-6 Stimuli Number |
136 |
|
4-4-2 |
Criteria for Abnormality |
140 |
|
4-4-3 |
Staging of Field Loss |
143 |
|
4-4-4 |
Test Selection |
144 |
|
4-4-5 |
Follow-up of Advanced Field Loss |
144 |
|
4-5 Evaluation of a Series of Tests |
144 |
|
|
4-5-1 |
Baseline Establishment |
146 |
|
4-5-2 |
Nature of Progression |
149 |
|
4-5-3 Artifacts |
149 |
|
|
4-5-4 |
Long-Term Fluctuation |
154 |
|
4-5-5 |
Criteria for Progression |
155 |
|
4-5-6 |
Glaucoma Progression Analysis |
157 |
|
4-5-7 |
Trend Analysis |
159 |
|
4-5-8 |
Follow-up of Central Abnormalities |
159 |
|
4-6 Future of Automated Perimetry |
161 |
|
|
4-6-1 |
Altered Stimuli |
161 |
|
|
4-6-1-1 Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry |
161 |
|
|
4-6-1-2 Frequency-Doubling Technology |
165 |
|
|
4-6-1-3 Flicker Perimetry |
165 |
|
|
4-6-1-4 Ring Perimetry |
167 |
|
|
4-6-1-5 Motion Automated Perimetry |
168 |
|
|
4-6-1-6 Pattern-Discrimination Perimetry |
168 |
|
|
4-6-1-7 Color Perimetry |
168 |
|
4-6-2 |
Altered Strategies |
169 |
|
4-6-3 |
Interpretive Aids |
171 |
Chapter 5. Inherited or Congenital Optic Nerve Diseases |
177 |
||
|
Peter A. Quiros, MD, Carlos Filipe Chicani, MD, PhD, |
|
|
|
and Alfredo A. Sadun, MD, PhD |
|
|
|
5-1 Introduction |
177 |
|
|
5-2 Congenital Optic Disc Anomalies |
177 |
|
|
5-2-1 |
Aplasias and Dysplasias |
177 |
|
5-2-2 |
Optic Nerve Colobomas and Pits |
179 |
|
5-2-3 |
Anomalous Disc Elevations: Pseudopapilledema With or Without |
|
|
|
Hyaline Bodies (Drusen) |
181 |
|
5-2-4 |
Tilted Disc and Crescents |
181 |
|
|
Contents |
xv |
5-3 Heredodegenerative Optic Atrophies |
182 |
||
|
5-3-1 |
Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy |
183 |
|
5-3-2 |
Dominant Optic Atrophy |
185 |
|
5-3-3 |
Recessive Optic Atrophy |
189 |
Chapter 6. Acquired Optic Nerve Diseases |
193 |
||
Carlos Filipe Chicani, MD, PhD, Peter A. Quiros, MD, |
|
||
and Alfredo A. Sadun, MD, PhD |
|
||
6-1 |
Introduction |
193 |
|
6-2 |
Optic Neuritis |
194 |
|
6-3 Ischemic Optic Neuropathy |
196 |
||
|
6-3-1 |
Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy |
196 |
|
6-3-2 |
Arteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy |
196 |
6-4 Metabolic Optic Neuropathies |
198 |
||
6-5 Compressive Optic Neuropathy |
198 |
||
6-6 Papilledema |
200 |
||
Chapter 7. Visual Field Defects in Chorioretinal Disorders |
207 |
||
Ron A. Adelman, MD, MPH, FACS, and Patricia Pahk, MD |
|
||
7-1 |
Introduction |
207 |
|
7-2 Macular Diseases |
207 |
||
7-3 Vascular Diseases |
209 |
||
7-4 Congenital and Genetic Diseases |
211 |
||
7-5 Inflammatory/Infectious Diseases |
217 |
||
7-6 |
Toxicity |
226 |
|
7-7 Peripheral Retina |
226 |
||
Chapter 8. Optic Chiasm Field Defects |
233 |
||
Christine E. Lin, and Jeffrey G. Odel, MD |
|
||
8-1 History and Overview |
233 |
||
8-2 Anatomy of the Chiasm |
234 |
||
|
8-2-1 Gross Anatomy |
234 |
|
|
8-2-2 Nerve Fiber Anatomy |
236 |
|
8-3 |
Tests for Field Defects |
240 |
|
8-4 Chiasmal Visual Field Defects |
241 |
||
8-5 Chiasmal Region Lesions |
247 |
||
|
8-5-1 |
Common Lesions Affecting the Optic Chiasm |
247 |
|
8-5-2 |
Pituitary Tumors |
247 |
|
8-5-3 Meningiomas |
248 |
|
|
|
8-5-3-1 Suprasellar Meningiomas |
248 |
|
|
8-5-3-2 Suprachiasmatic Meningiomas |
249 |
|
|
8-5-3-3 Parasellar Meningiomas |
249 |
|
8-5-4 Craniopharyngiomas |
249 |
|
|
8-5-5 Aneurysms |
249 |
|
|
8-5-6 |
Dilatation of Third Ventricle |
250 |
|
8-5-7 |
Miscellaneous Lesions |
250 |
8-6 Pseudo Temporal and Bitemporal Hemianopia |
250 |
||
xvi |
Contents |
|
|
|
Chapter 9. |
Optic Tract and Lateral Geniculate Body Field Defects |
253 |
||
|
|
Thomas R. Hedges III, MD |
|
|
|
|
9-1 Optic Tract Field Defects |
253 |
|
|
|
9-2 Lateral Geniculate Body Field Defects |
258 |
|
Chapter 10. |
Retrogeniculate Visual Field Defects |
263 |
||
|
|
Thomas R. Hedges III, MD |
|
|
|
|
10-1 Testing for Reticulogeniculate Visual Field Defects |
263 |
|
|
|
10-2 Localization and Congruity of Optic Radiation and |
|
|
|
|
Calcarine Cortex Visual Field Defects |
264 |
|
|
|
10-3 Temporal Lobe Field Defects |
267 |
|
|
|
10-4 Parietal Lobe Field Defects |
269 |
|
|
|
10-5 Occipital Lobe Field Defects |
272 |
|
|
|
10-5-1 |
Types of Occipital Cortex Field Defects |
273 |
|
|
10-5-2 |
Field Defects Unique to the Occipital Cortex |
282 |
|
|
10-5-3 |
Color Field Defects in the Occipital Lobe |
285 |
Chapter 11. |
Functional Visual Loss. |
293 |
||
|
|
Thomas J. Walsh, MD |
|
|
|
|
11-1 Types of Patients |
293 |
|
|
|
11-2 Types of Field Loss |
294 |
|
|
|
11-3 Tests for Functional Field Loss |
295 |
|
|
|
Index |
|
299 |
Contributors
Ron A. Adelman, MD, MPH, FACS |
Peter A. Quiros, MD |
|
Yale University |
Doheny Eye Institute |
|
Joseph Caprioli, MD |
Alfredo A. Sadun, MD, PhD |
|
Jules Stein UCLA School of Medicine |
Doheny Eye Institute |
|
Carlos Filipe Chicani, MD, PhD |
George Shafranov, MD |
|
Doheny Eye Institute |
Yale University |
|
Thomas R. Hedges III, MD |
Thomas J. Walsh, MD |
|
Tufts University Medical School |
Yale University |
|
Christine E. Lin |
Marc L. Weitzman, MD |
|
Columbia University |
Assistant Clinical Professor |
|
Hylton R. Mayer, MD |
Yale University School of Medicine |
|
|
||
Yale University |
Jonathan D. Wirtschafter, MD |
|
Jeffrey G. Odel, MD |
University of Minnesota School of |
|
Medicine |
||
Columbia University |
||
|
||
Patricia Pahk, MD |
|
|
Mount Sinai Medical Center |
|
xvii
This page intentionally left blank
A History of Perimetry
THOMAS J. WALSH, MD
The history of perimetry is the history of anatomy. In the early days of perimetry, in the late 1800s, the study of anatomy involved learning the muscles, vessels, and bony structures of the body. The brain was recognized as an organ, but the special functions of its different structures were generally
unknown. Before the availability of current methods to study the brain—including those based on histology, electron microscopy, and electrophysiology and magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, optical coherence tomography, and positron emission tomography—our predecessors used their observations of visual functions to devise a technique to examine those functions: this technique is called perimetry. Just as the field of anatomy has been dynamic, so has the development of techniques in perimetry. With the advent of more sophisticated techniques, we have been able to diagnose diseases earlier and treat them more successfully. However, some of the older techniques can still be used when sophisticated techniques do not work, especially in neuro-ophthalmology.
Perimetric techniques are as variable as are the patients and the diseases that are treated. Although most of this monograph is directed at computerized perimetry, techniques such as confrontation and the tangent screen are also discussed. Just as the range of defects varies, so, too, must the range of different techniques mark the ability of an accomplished perimetrist. As newer techniques and newer computerized programs come online, updating the sophistication of perimetry, so, too, should the perimetrist continually hone his or her skills.
The contributors to this monograph are humbled by the giant steps in the development of perimetry made by the observations and ingenuity of those who have preceded us.
In this chapter, we present the contributions and persons who are important to the history of our understanding of perimetry. The Imaging and Perimetry Society (formerly the International Perimetric Society)1 has added to our knowledge of those who have gone before us, including a history of perimetry by Thompson
xix
