Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit 2nd edition_Coleman, Silverman, Lizzi_2006
.pdf
Figure 3.153. A very high frequency 22-MHz image at the posterior pole of the normal eye demonstrating the
sclera-Tenon's boundary as well as the retina-choroid thickness. Note the excellent resolution of the thickened
sclera near the optic nerve.
Figure 3.154. 20-MHz image of the posterior pole made with the Cinescan from Quantel demonstrating the separation of sclera and Tenon's and the thickness of the posterior coats of the eye.
P.117
Figure 3.155. Left: 20-MHz image using the Quantel Cinescan demonstrating a vitreous traction membrane in a patient with cystoid macular edema. Right: A high frequency posterior pole image of a patient with cystic macular edema, demonstrating separation of sclera and Tenon's, as well as accentuation of the optic nerve sheath. This indicates that there is often a tenonitis accompanying the cystoid macular changes.
The usefulness of 20-MHz imaging must be placed in the context of other technologies, including conventional 10-MHz B-scan and optical coherence tomography (OCT). An ultrasound of 20 MHz is superior to that of 10 MHz in situations where resolution is crucial and penetration is less important. The OCT-3 (Zeiss Humphrey Systems) provides an axial resolution of 10 microns and a lateral resolution of 20 microns, far higher resolution than even 20-MHz ultrasound. However, OCT suffers greatly from attenuation as it passes through optically absorbing tissues, and a penetration of less than 1 mm is obtained. OCT images provide fine detail of retinal pathology but little information at the level of the choroid or deeper. In small (<1.5 mm thick) pigmented lesions, OCT is of little value because of light attenuation by melanin. In such lesions, the improved resolution of 20 MHz becomes invaluable for assessment of size, choroidal involvement, and the presence of extraocular extension. In situations where opacities exist along the optic axis (cataract, hemorrhage), OCT cannot be used, and 20-MHz ultrasound becomes the sole imaging method.
I-scan, C-scan, 3-D, Swept-scan Vascular Imaging, and Image Fusion Technology
In the evaluation of ophthalmic ultrasound, several imaging modes have shown promising improvements in diagnostic potential that adumbrate changes to follow.
Digital analytic imaging was mentioned earlier in relation to identification and separation of echoes in the cornea and the choroid. Certainly, accuracy is vastly improved, especially with very high frequency scans.
The use of 3-D ultrasound with coronal multiplanar reconstruction adds new means of evaluating ocular pathology. We first used 3-D in ophthalmology to demonstrate volume (Figure 3.156) and aid diagnosis (Figure 3.157; see also DVD) (142). Fisher has shown remarkable definition in scans of the posterior pole with this method, as shown in Figure 3.158 (see also DVD). Silverman and Ferrara (44) have demonstrated that swept scan technology (Chapter 2) can allow vascular patterns and flow characteristics to be both demonstrated and measured (Figure 3.159; see also DVD).
Image fusion and multispectral techniques allow us to combine data from imaging techniques, such as OCT and ultrasound, to improve diagnosis of retinal and
P.118
choroidal pathology, such as nevi and small melanomas (Figure 3.160).
Figure 3.156. A three-dimensional scan of a ciliary body melanoma, which can allow accurate volume measurements to be calculated. (See also DVD.)
Figure 3.157. Three-dimensional reconstruction of a partially dislocated lens in a patient complaining of photophobia and diplopia. The lens shown in red pseudocolor is noted to have slipped posterior to the posterior capsule (yellow). Repositioning of the lens eliminated the symptoms. (See also DVD.) (see color image)
All of these techniques dramatize the continually evolving technology and instrumentation that lead to greater accuracy of measurement and diagnosis that exemplify the ever expanding field of ophthalmic ultrasound.
Figure 3.158. Three-dimensional ultrasonogram from the OTI. (Courtesy of Yale Fisher, MD.) (See also DVD.)
Figure 3.159. Swept-scan analysis of the arterial circle of the iris in a rabbit, demonstrating a method of
measuring blood flow in small vessels. (See also DVD.) (see color image)
P.119
Figure 3.160. Demonstration of fusing of OCT and high resolution posterior pole images to demonstrate the use of the OCT for confirming the separation retina and choroid and in providing an alternate measurement of retinal thickness. (see color image)
The next chapter will pursue high frequency ultrasound examinations of refractive elements of the anterior segment.
REFERENCES
1.Mundt G, Hughes W. Ultrasonics in ocular diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1956;41:488-498.
2.Oksala A, Lehtinen A. Diagnostic value of ultrasonics in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:387-395.
3.Jansson F. Measurement of intraocular distances by ultrasound and comparison between optical and ultrasonic determination of the depth of the anterior chamber. Acta Ophthalmol 1963;41:25-61.
4.Jansson F. Measurements of intraocular distances by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol 1963;74:1-51.
5.Oksala A, Lehtinen A. A measurement of the velocity of sound in some parts of the eye. Acta Ophthalmol 1958;36: 633-639.
6.Sorsby A, Leary GA. A Longitudinal Study of Refraction and Its Components During Growth. Special Report Series/Medical Research Council (Great Britain) 1969;309: 1-41.
7.Coleman DJ, Carlin B. A new system for visual axis measurements in the human eye using ultrasound. Arch Ophthalmol 1967;77:124-127.
8.Giglio EJ, Ludlam WM, Wittenberg S. Improvement in the measurement of intraocular distances using ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;44:1359-1364.
9.Oksala A. The echogram in the diagnosis of eye diseases. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1960;137:72-87.
10.Bronson NR. Techniques of ultrasonic localization and extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1965;60:596-603.
11.Ossoinig K. Clinical echo-ophthalmology. In: Blodi F, ed. Current Concepts of Ophthalmology. St. Louis: Mosby, 1972. v.III.
12.Ossoinig K. The evaluation of kinetic properties of echo signals. In: Oksala A, Gernet H, eds. Ultrasonics in Ophthalmology. S. Karger, 1967.
13.Buschmann W, Staudt J. Fundamentals of echographic differential diagnosis. In: Ossoinig K, ed. Ultrasonographia Medica (SIDUO III). Vienna: Verlag der Weiner Med Akad, 1971.
14.Gernet H. Ultraschall-Biometrie des Auges. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 1967;151:853-871.
15.Massin M, Poujol J. Clinical value of time-amplitude ultrasonography in 1,000 patients. In: K. Gitter et al., ed. Ophthalmic Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby, 1969.
16.Francois J, Goes F, Yobbagyi P. Ultrasonic echography in ophthalmology. Ann Ocul (Paris) 1968;201:609-645.
17.Vanysek J, Preisova J, Obraz J. Ultrasonography in Ophthalmology. London: Butterworth-Heineman, 1969.
18.Bertenyi A, Betko J, Greguss P. Comparison between ultrasound and isotope diagnosis of intraocular tumors. In: Ossoinig K, ed. Ultrasonographica Medica (SIDUO III). Vienna: Verlag der Weiner Med Akad, 1971.
19.Gallenga R. The role of diagnostic ultrasound after nine years of routine clinic. In: Ossoinig K, ed. Ultrasonographica Medica (SIDUO III). Vienna: Verlag der Weiner Med Akad, 1971.
20.Sarin L, Meyer D, Gitter K, et al. The clinical evaluation of the use of ultrasound (A-scan) in 500 patients. In: Vanysek J, ed. Diagnostica ultrasonica in ophthalmologica (SIDUO II). Brno: University of Brno, 1968.
21.Keeney AH. Ultrasound in Clinical Ophthalmological Diagnosis. Transactions of the Pacific Coast-to-Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting. 1967;51:89-97.
22.Penner R, Passmore JW. Magnetic vs nonmagnetic intraocular foreign bodies. An ultrasonic determination. Arch Ophthalmol 1966;76:676-677.
23.Cowden JW, Runyan TE. Localization of intraocular foreign bodies. Further experiences in ultrasonic vs radiologic methods. Arch Ophthalmol
1969;82:299-301.
24.Baum G, Greenwood I. The application of ultrasonic locating techniques to ophthalmology. Part I: reflective properties. Am J Ophthalmol
1958;82:475-479.
25.Baum G, Greenwood I. Ultrasonography—an aid in orbital tumor diagnosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1960;64:180-194.
26.Baum G. Use of ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of ocular tumors. In: Boniuk M, ed. Ocular and Adnexal Tumors. St. Louis: Mosby, 1964.
27.Baum G. Aids in ultrasonic diagnosis. J Acoust Soc Am 1970;48(Suppl 2):1407+.
28.Purnell E. Ultrasound in ophthalmological diagnosis. In: R. Goldberg and L. Sarin, ed. Diagnostic Ultrasound New York: Plenum Press, 1966.
29.Purnell E. Ultrasonic interpretation of orbital disease. In: K. Gitter et al., ed. Ophthalmic Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby, 1969.
P.120
30.Purnell EW, Sokollu A, Holasek E. The production of focal chorioretinitis by ultrasound. A preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 1964;58:953-957.
31.Purnell E. Therapeutic use of ultrasound. In: Sarin LK, ed. Ultrasonics in Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1967.
32.Holasek E, Sokollu A. Direct Contact, Hand Held, Diagnostic B-scanner. Proceedings IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; 1972.
33.Coleman DJ, Konig WF, Katz L. A hand-operated, ultrasound scan system for ophthalmic evaluation. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:256-263.
34.Bronson NR. Development of a simple B-scan ultrasonoscope. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1972;70:365-408.
35.Fisher YL, Bronson NR, Schutz JS, et al. Contact B-scan ultrasonography: clinicopathological correlations. Ann Ophthalmol 1975;7:779-786.
36.Coleman DJ. Reliability of ocular and orbital diagnosis with B-scan ultrasound. I. Ocular diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;73:501-516.
37.Coleman DJ. Reliability of ocular and orbital diagnosis with B-scan ultrasound. II. Orbital diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;74:704-718.
38.Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Jack R. Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1977.
39.Coleman DJ, Katz L. Color coding of B-scan ultrasonograms. Arch Ophthalmol 1974;91(6):429-431.
40.Coleman DJ, Katz L, Lizzi FL. Isometric, three-dimensional viewing of ultrasonograms. Arch Ophthalmol 1975; 93: 1362-1365.
41.Coleman DJ, Weininger R. Ultrasonic M-mode technique in ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82: 475-479.
42.Coleman DJ, Jack RL, Franzen LA. Ultrasonography in ocular trauma. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;75:279-288.
43.Coleman DJ. Measurement of choroidal pulsation with M-scan ultrasound. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;1:363-365.
44.Silverman RH, Kruse DE, Coleman DJ, et al. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging of blood flow in the anterior segment of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40: 1373-1381.
45.Erickson SJ, Hendrix LE, Massaro BM, et al. Color Doppler flow imaging of the normal and abnormal orbit. Radiology 1989;173:511-516.
46.Ardouin M, Urvoy M, Sabouraud O, et al. L'effet Doppler. Quels renseignements peut-il fournir a l'ophthalmologiste? Bull Soc Ophthalmol Fr 1975;75: 91-100.
47.Ardouin M, Urvoy M, Herve C. Effet Dopler et arteve ophthalmique. Bull Soc Ophthalmol Fr 1976;76:1099-1102.
48.Yamamoto Y. Doppler examination of blood flow in the ocular fundus. Bibl Ophthalmol 1975;83:32-40.
49.Yamamoto Y, Hirano S, Manabe T, et al. Supersonic observations of eyes in premature babies. Part 2: Hemodynamics at eye ground. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zashi 1976; 80:1194-1203.
50.Lieb WE, Merton DA, Shields JA, et al. Colour Doppler imaging in the demonstration of an orbital varix. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74:305-308.
51.Lieb W, Flaharty P, Gobel W. Color Doppler imaging—a technique to study the hemodynamics of ocular and orbital veins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1992;33:1047.
52.Finger PT, Romero JM, Rosen RB, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of choroidal melanoma: localization of radioactive eye plaques. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116:305-312.
53.Lizzi FL, Astor M, Feleppa EJ, et al. Statistical framework for ultrasonic spectral parameter imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23:1371-1382.
54.Silverman RH, Lizzi FL, Ursea BG, et al. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging and characterization of the ciliary body. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2001;42:885-894.
55.Silverman RH, Folberg R, Rondeau MJ, et al. Spectral parameter imaging for detection of prognostically significant histologic features in uveal melanoma. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:951-959.
56.Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, et al. Noninvasive in vivo detection of prognostic indicators for high-risk uveal melanoma: ultrasound parameter imaging. Ophthalmology 2004;111:558-564.
57.Coleman DJ, Rondeau MJ, Silverman RH, et al. Correlation of microcirculation architecture with ultrasound backscatter parameters of uveal melanoma.
Eur J Ophthalmol 1995;5:96-106.
58.Feleppa EJ, Lizzi FL, Coleman DJ, et al. Diagnostic spectrum analysis in ophthalmology: a physical perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986;12:623-631.
59.Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasound biomicroscopy. High-frequency ultrasound imaging of the eye at microscopic resolution. Radiol Clin North Am
1998;36:1047-1058.
60.Foster FS, Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz KA, et al. Advances in ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26: 1-27.
61.Fisher Y, Hanutsaha P, Tong S, et al. Three-dimensional ophthalmic contact B-scan ultrasonography of the posterior segment. Retina 1998;18:251-256.
62.Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Daly SM, et al. Advances in ophthalmic ultrasound. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36: 1073-1082.
63.Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Sutton HF, et al. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery: anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery. Ophthalmology 1999;106:474-482.
64.Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, et al. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis [Erratum appears in J Refract Surg 2001;7:4]. J Refract Surg 2000;16:414-430.
65.Pavlin CJ, Harasiewicz K, Sherar MD, et al. Clinical use of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmology 1991;98: 287-295.
66.Pavlin CJ, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Subsurface ultrasound microscopic imaging of the intact eye. Ophthalmology 1990;97:244-250.
67.Coleman DJ, Fish SK. Presbyopia, accommodation, and the mature catenary. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1544-1551.
68.Coleman DJ, Rondeau MJ, Silverman RH, Lizzi FL. Computerized ultrasonic biometry and imaging of intraocular tumors for the monitoring of therapy. Tr Am Ophth Soc 1987;LXXXV:49-81.
69.Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, Woods SM. Ultrasonic evaluation of vitreous and retina. In: Tasman W and Jaeger EA, eds. Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992.
70.Ossoinig KC. Standardized echography: basic principles, clinical applications, and results. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1979; 19:127-210.
71.Byrne SF. Standardized echography. Part I: A-scan examination procedures. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1979;19:267-281.
72.Ossoinig KC, Byrne SF, Weyer NJ. Standardized echography. Part II: Performance of standardized echography by the technician. Int Ophthalmol Clin
1979;19:283-285.
73.Byrne SF, Ronald L, Green MD. Ultrasound of the Eye and Orbit. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.
74.Dibernardo C, Schachat AP, Fekrat S. Ophthalmic Ultrasound: A Diagnostic Atlas. 1st ed. Thieme Medical Publishers, 1998.
P.121
75.Oksala A, Varonen E. The influence of the eyeball on the ultrasonic field of the transducer and its diagnostic significance. Acta Ophthalmol
1965;43:268-271.
76.Kossoff G. Ultrasonic visualization system. In: K. Gitter et al., ed. Ophthalmic Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby, 1965.
77.Baum G. An evaluation of ultrasonic techniques used in measurements of eye size. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;64: 926-936.
78.Coleman DJ, Jack RL, Cardona H. Ultrasonic evaluation of eyes with keratoprostheses. Am J Ophthalmol 1972; 74:543-554.
79.Ray S, Khan BF, Dohlman CH, et al. Management of vitreoretinal complications in eyes with permanent keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol
2002;120:559-566.
80.Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Plateau iris syndrome: changes in angle opening associated with dark, light, and pilocarpine administration. Am J Ophthalmol
1999;128:288-291.
81.Coleman DJ. Unified model for accommodative mechanism. Am J Ophthalmol 1970;69:1063-1079.
82.Koretz JF, Cook CA, Kaufman PL. Aging of the human lens: changes in lens shape upon accommodation and with accommodative loss. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002;19:144-151.
83.van der Heijde GL, Beers AP, Dubbelman M. Microfluctuations of steady-state accommodation measured with ultrasonography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
1996;16:216-221.
84.Vilupuru AS, Glasser A. Dynamic accommodative changes in rhesus monkey eyes assessed with A-scan ultrasound biometry. Optom Vis Sci
2003;80:383-394.
85.Deng CX, Lizzi FL, Silverman RH, et al. Imaging and spectrum analysis of contrast agents in the in vivo rabbit eye using very-high-frequency ultrasound.
Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24:383-394.
86.Rondeau MJ, Barcsay G, Silverman RH, et al. Very high frequency ultrasound biometry of angle and sulcus dimensions. J Refract Surg
2004;20(5):454-464.
87.Cibis P. Vitreoretinal Pathology and Surgery in Retinal Detachment. St. Louis: Mosby, 1965.
88.Cibis P, Yamashita T. Experimental aspects of ocular siderosis and hemosiderosis. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;48:465-480.
89.Regnault FR. Vitreous hemorrhage: an experimental study. I. A macroscopic and isotopic study of the evolution of whole blood and hemoglobin. Arch Ophthalmol 1970;83:458-465.
90.Machemer R, Williams JM Sr. Pathogenesis and therapy of traction detachment in various retinal vascular diseases [Erratum appears in Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105: 714]. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105:170-181.
91.Machemer R, Sugita G, Tano Y. Treatment of intraocular proliferations with intravitreal steroids. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1979;77:171-180.
92.Machemer R, Roters S. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of chronic hypotony after cataract extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:327-329.
93.Coleman DJ, Daly SW, Atencio A, et al. Ultrasonic evaluation of the vitreous and retina. Semin Ophthalmol 1998; 13:210-218.
94.Coleman DJ, Franzen LA. Vitreous surgery: preoperative evaluation and prognostic value of ultrasonic display of vitreous hemorrhage. Arch Ophthalmol
1974;92: 375-381.
95.Boldt HC, Brown DM, McGeorge AJ. Echographic diagnosis of degenerative retinoschisis facilitated by scleral indentation. Am J Ophthalmol
