Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Tumors of the Eye and Ocular Adnexa_Char_2001
.pdf
10 TUMORS OF THE EYE AND OCULAR ADNEXA
sentation; however, the appearance of a cutaneous horn or extensive keratinization is most consistent for this neoplasm (Figure 1–18). Histologic diagnosis can also be difficult; in one series, only 12 of 115 tumors initially diagnosed as squamous cell carcinomas retained that diagnosis on re-evaluation.105 As discussed under “treatment”, squamous cell carcinoma has a slightly more malignant course than has basal cell carcinoma.107–110 Often, extension to the regional nodes, direct invasion, or perineural progression can occur; the last was first described in 1909. Most of the patients with perineural progres-
sion have had a resection of the tumor in the past and |
Figure 1–19. Patient with perineural invasion of the superior orbit |
|
present with recent onset diplopia (Figure 1–19). On |
from a squamous cell carcinoma producing diplopia in upgaze. |
|
|
||
a direct coronal scan of the patient shown in Figure |
are four types of cutaneous melanomas: lentigo |
|
1–19, perineural invasion is seen in the superior |
||
orbit (Figure 1–20).111,112 Most commonly, direct |
maligna, acral lentiginous, nodular melanomas, and |
|
perineural invasion into the central nervous system |
superficial spreading melanomas. All melanomas, |
|
is the cause of death.10,107–110,112 The patient with |
with the exception of the nodular subgroup, have a |
|
perineural extension from an undiagnosed squa- |
radial growth-phase component.119 Approximately |
|
mous cell carcinoma of the face (often the history is |
50 percent of eyelid melanomas are nodular |
|
removal of a facial lesion without histologic confir- |
melanomas, and 40 percent are superficial spreading |
|
mation of its nature) usually presents to the neu- |
melanomas.116 Signs suggestive of a melanoma are |
|
rophthalmologist with either paraesthesias, numb- |
variegated pigmented tumors, often with inflamma- |
|
ness, or paresis of the extraocular muscles. If a |
tion, the new development or spread of pigment, or |
|
primary is known, the median time between its diag- |
increase in tumor thickness.120 The histologic diag- |
|
nosis of a cutaneous melanoma can be difficult. Sev- |
||
nosis and the development of orbital involvement is |
||
eral studies have shown discordance between expert |
||
usually less than 2 years, but an interval as long as |
||
pathologists in the diagnoses of benign and malig- |
||
10 years has been reported.113 |
||
The biology of keratoacanthoma is uncertain. |
nant cutaneous pigmented lesions.120,121 About 40 |
|
percent of lid melanomas are nonpigmented. Typical |
||
Some immunologic data would be consistent with |
||
lid melanomas are shown in Figures 1–21 through |
||
the hypothesis that keratoacanthomas are a “forme |
||
|
||
fruste” of regressed squamous cell carcinoma.114,115 |
|
|
As previously noted, biologically, these can progress |
|
|
to squamous cell carcinomas.48 |
|
MALIGNANT MELANOMA
Melanomas account for approximately 1 percent of eyelid tumors.116 As discussed above, pigmented basal cell carcinoma is almost 10 times more common than melanoma as a cause of a pigmented lid neoplasm. Several studies have shown that the annual incidence of melanoma has at least tripled in the last four decades in all age groups.116,117
Probably the majority of melanomas arise from malignant degeneration of pre-existing nevi.118 There
Figure 1–20. The direct coronal MR image from the patient shown in Figure 1–19 demonstrates perineural invasion into the superior orbit.
Diagnosis of Lid Tumors |
11 |
Figure 1–21. Lentigo maligna lid melanoma. |
Figure 1–23. Amelanotic lid melanoma. |
1–23. Occasionally, the eyelid may be secondarily involved by a conjunctival melanoma (Figure 1–24).
Early diagnosis of melanomas, when the tumor is relatively thin, has resulted in improved prognosis. While other factors, including gender, age, site, ulceration, regression, and mitotic index are correlated with prognosis, tumor thickness remains the most important predictor of prognosis. In melanomas of < 0.85 mm thickness, there is < 1 percent tumor-related mortality, while lesions > 3.65 mm thick have 8-year survival rates of < 38 percent.125 Further, for cutaneous melanomas, the average time to metastasize varies according to tumor thickness. In thin melanomas, tumor-related mortality peaked at 6 years, while thicker tumors had a mortality peak at approximately 40 months.126 The reason for the better prognosis in women is uncertain; hypotheses advanced include a difference in
anatomic sites, differences in tumor thickness, and hormonal factors.123
Unlike uveal melanomas, in which it is not uncommon to develop metastases more than 10 years after diagnosis, late onset of widespread disease is rare with cutaneous melanomas, and over 80 percent of late metastases have occurred with uveal melanomas.127–131
There have been several staging systems for cutaneous melanoma since one of the earliest in 1947 by Ackerman and Del Regato.
Table 1–4 shows a truncated revision of the 1997 Joint Committee on the cancer staging system for melanoma. It is very rare to see melanomas of the lid present with nodal involvement. “Level” in Table 1–4 refers to the earlier Clark classification, while “thickness” is derived from the work of Breslow.132 In a large retrospective study by Volmer, he noted that in
|
Figure 1–24. Palpebral conjunctival melanoma involving the entire |
Figure 1–22. Sparsely pigmented lid melanoma. |
upper lid. |
12 TUMORS OF THE EYE AND OCULAR ADNEXA
Table 1–4. TRUNCATED REVISION OF THE 1997 JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER STAGING SYSTEM FOR MELANOMA
Stage |
Criterion Stage |
|
|
IApT1 |
< 0.75 mm thickness or level II |
IBpT2 |
> 0.75 to 1.50 mm thick or level III |
IIApT3 |
> 1.50 to 4.00 mm thick or level IV |
IIBpT4 |
> 4 mm thick or level V |
|
|
a vast majority of cases, thickness is a more important prognostic parameter than level.133 In cases where there appears to be a difference in the level and thickness criteria, the recommendation has been to use the finding with the worst prognostic significance to stage the tumor. In patients with lid tumors < 1 mm thick, it is probably not cost effective to do a metastatic work-up, unless they are symptomatic.133
TUMORS METASTATIC TO THE LIDS
Tumors metastatic to the lids are very rare. In a review of 1,502 lid biopsies, Foos and colleagues noted only one such lesion.134 Similarly, < 1 percent of 892 consecutive lid biopsies were metastatic in Aurora and Blodi’s series.3 Approximately 60 cases have been reported, some with both lid and orbital involvement. The vast majority have other known metastases at the time of presentation.135–143 As is the case for uveal metastases, lung and breast carcinomas account for approximately 80 percent of lesions that metastasize to the lid; however, rare malignancies, such as carcinoid and Merkel cell carcinomas, have also been reported.134,144,145
Figure 1–25. Cutaneous melanoma metastatic to lid.
Figure 1–26. Metastatic breast carcinoma diffusely involving the lower eye lid.
The clinical pattern of lid metastases is not pathognomonic. Usually, these lesions occur as a nodular or diffuse indurated area. The former presentation, as shown in Figure 1–25, is typical for a metastatic cutaneous melanoma, although occasional lid metastases can simulate a chalazion.120,136 Figure 1–26 shows metastasis of a diffuse breast carcinoma to the left lower eye lid, which responded completely to chemotherapy. In most cases, other evidence of metastasis are present at the time the lid lesion is diagnosed. As with uveal metastases, once the lid metastases are noted, survival is usually < 1 year.
KAPOSI’S SARCOMA
KS was first described in l872, although prior to l981, most of the cases of KS occurred in elderly Italian or Jewish males or African children.146,147 This vascular sarcoma had an indolent disease course and usually involved the extremities. KS, prior to the outbreak of acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome (AIDS), was rarely noted to involve the periocular structures. Only 30 cases in the lids or conjunctiva were described prior to 1982.147–151 KS is now a less common manifestation of AIDS, since the use of multiple protease inhibitors. Lid KS or, more commonly, lid and conjunctival KS can develop in homosexual males known to have AIDS. Usually, these lesions are violaceous in color (Figure 1–27), and often, the conjunctival involvement is diffuse and can simulate inflammation (see Chapter 4, Figure 4–36).
Figure 1–27. Kaposi’s sarcoma in a patient with AIDS.
Unfortunately, while local control is easily achieved with low-dose radiation therapy, the systemic disease process has been rapidly fatal.102 As mentioned above, with the newer generation of drugs, KS is much less common, and it is uncertain if this statement regarding mortality is still relevant.
RARE LID MALIGNANCIES
There are a number of rare lid malignant tumors that are only diagnosed on histologic examination. As discussed above, these tumors, like other malignant lesions, show growth, inflammation, or other signs of invasive behavior; but none have a pathognomonic appearance.152–161 An adnexal malignancy is shown in Figure 1–28; as in a basal cell carcinoma, there is loss of lashes, but the author has not observed ulceration with these lesions.
Figure 1–28. Adnexal malignant tumor with loss of lashes.
Diagnosis of Lid Tumors |
13 |
Merkel cell carcinomas are derived from neuroendocrine cells that are present in the basal layer of the epidermis and outer root sheath of hair follicles, and function as mechanoreceptors. These neoplasms typically involve the upper lid and are usually violaceous and have overlying telangiectasia;120,162–165 rarely, these lesions can be multiple.166 They occur more commonly in females, and often express both cytokeratin-20 and neurofilament protein.167 They often have a typical pattern; in the one Merkel cell tumor that this author managed, the diagnosis was not made prior to biopsy.168,169 Some of the rarer lid malignancies are listed in Table 1–2.170 Several case reports document such rare lesions as mucinous eccrine carcinomas, signet ring carcinomas of the eccrine gland, syringomatous carcinomas, and procarcinoma, all simulating more common tumors.171–177
In contrast to most lymphoid lesions that more commonly involve either the conjunctiva or the orbit, mycosis fungoides, an uncommon T-cell lymphoma, has a predilection for the eyelids when it involves the ocular structures.164–179 More commonly, T-cell lymphomas, when they involve the eye, produce other findings. In a large Mayo Clinic series, a cicatricial ectropion was the most common finding in 17 of 42 (40 percent) patients.180
PEDIATRIC LID TUMORS
Infantile Hemangioma
Capillary hemangiomas that involve the lid, conjunctiva, orbit, or a combination of these sites, most commonly present either at birth or in the first few months of life and are the most frequent ophthalmic neoplasm of infancy. There has been recent investigation in the molecular pathogenesis of this entity, although it currently does not have clinical application.5
A number of different terms have been used to describe this tumor, including juvenile hemangioma, cellular hemangioma, and benign hemangioendothelioma. These lesions usually present as a swelling of the eyelid, often involving the contiguous conjunctiva and the orbit (Figure 1–29). The mass is easily compressible and often has a reddish tint, although it may be bluish when the child cries (Figures 1–29 and 1–30). Figure 1–31 shows a parasagittal T1-weighted
14 TUMORS OF THE EYE AND OCULAR ADNEXA
Figure 1–29. Capillary hemangioma involves the lid, conjunctiva, and anterior orbit.
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of such a lesion. In contradiction to nonvascular tumors, capillary hemangiomas are dark on T1 -weighted images and hyperintense to brain on T2-weighted images (Figures 1–32 and 1–33). On the T2-weighted image, this mass is hyperintense to brain. Ninety-five percent of capillary hemangiomas are evident before age 6 months, and occasionally, they are noted in the first week of life. Usually, the growth in the first year is rapid, and then slow regression occurs.181 An example is shown in Figures 1–34 and 1–35. Figure 1–34 is a child the day after birth; the same child 1 year later is shown in Figure 1–35. Involution is usually complete by 5 years. Initial clinical findings of involution are a central loss of the bright color of the mass.182 Most series have noted more females than males, often in a 3:1 ratio. Similarly, it appears that women who have undergone chorionic villus sampling have over a 10-fold increased chance of developing this problem.183
Figure 1–30. Typical color of lid hemangioma.
Figure 1–31. T1-weighted parasagittal MR image of a capillary hemangioma. On T2–weighted scans the lesion is hyperintense to brain.
The clinical course of these lesions is extremely variable. Often, they will show growth in the first 3 to 9 months of life, remain stationary, and then slowly resolve. Stigmar and colleagues noted that approximately 60 percent of cases resolved by age 4 years and 75 percent by age 7 years.184
Unfortunately, a number of major complications can occur; most commonly, these include strabismus,
Figure 1–32. T1-weighted axial MR images. The tumor is hypointense in respect to brain.
Diagnosis of Lid Tumors |
15 |
Figure 1–33. T2-weighted MR image. The capillary hemangioma is hyperintense with respect to brain.
anisometropic amblyopia, proptosis, and compression of the optic nerve. Haik and colleagues reviewed 101 cases of capillary hemangioma and found an 80 percent complication rate, with 60 percent of patients having amblyopia.185 In a study of 51 cases, Stigmar and associates noted that 27 developed amblyopia, and 17 had strabismus.123 Robb found that 46 percent of 37 patients had refractive errors, with both myopia and astigmatism.186 Amblyopia occurred most commonly when the eyelid occluded the pupil.
The author conservatively monitors most infants with capillary hemangiomas, unless a biopsy is needed to exclude the diagnosis of a possible malignant tumor or, more commonly, enlargement of the mass makes the development of amblyopia likely.
Figure 1–35. Patient shown in Figure 1-34 at age 1 year.
Generally, if the visual axis is not occluded, the author has opted for serial observation, since these children are at much less risk for developing amblyopia, although pressure of the tumor may alter the refractive status of the globe. If the mass grows and the visual axis is obstructed, then intervention is mandated.
There have been a number of therapeutic options, including injection of sclerosing agents, radiotherapy, systemic steroids, local steroid injection, diathermy, and surgical excision.187 Most clinicians have abandoned the use of radiation, diathermy, or sclerosing agents. Certainly, the use of radon seeds is no longer advisable, given the public health safety problems with that particular isotope. In some of the experimental models, therapy with angiogenesis inhibitors has shown some promise.188
Intralesional steroid injection has been used in a number of infantile hemangiomas. Fost and Esterly
|
Figure 1–36. Growing capillary hemangioma of the lid with |
Figure 1–34. Neonate prior to appearance of hemangioma. |
amblyopia. |
16 TUMORS OF THE EYE AND OCULAR ADNEXA
Figure 1–37. Three days after intralesional steroid injection with |
Figure 1–39. Plexiform lid neurofibroma in Von Recklinghaus neu- |
shrinkage. |
rofibromatosis. |
first described this technique in nonophthalmic cases in 1968.189 Hiles and Plichard first described its use in the management of ophthalmic cases, and Kushner popularized this technique.190,191 Kushner described good resolution in most patients with intralesional steroids.191,192 In growing lesions or in those that occlude the peripapillary axis on initial examination, approximately 1.0 cc of 40 mg/mL of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (Solu-Medrol) is injected into multiple sites of the lesion. Usually, there is blanching of the vascular pattern with rapid regression of tumor size within 48 hours after injection. In lesions that respond, involution is quite rapid over the first 2 weeks but may continue over a 2-month period. Some lesions have not responded to steroid injection, and if no response occurs in the first 2 weeks, a sec-
Figure 1–38. Resections of capillary hemangioma after failure to respond to intralesional corticosteroids.
ond injection is given. The author has never seen a patient who has not responded to two injections respond to further steroids. Figures 1–36 and 1–37 demonstrate a patient with a growing capillary hemangioma of the lid prior to and 3 days after intralesional steroids. Two injections of intralesional steroids have
A
B
Figure 1–40. A, Clinical photograph of a large plexiform neurofibroma. B, T1-weighted axial MR scan of the NF-1 patient shown in 1–40A.
Figure 1–41. One day after excision of neurofibroma shown in Figure 1–40.
little systemic morbidity, but there have been isolated reports of other complications. Sutula and Glover noted eyelid necrosis after steroid injection in a young female.193 Other case reports have noted other corticosteroid complications, such as linear fat atrophy, pigmentation, subcutaneous atrophy, adrenal suppression, and occlusion of the central retinal artery.194–196 Neither Kushner nor this author have had these complications occur.192 Oral steroids (oral prednisone) are also used, generally in a dose of 3 to 5 mg/kg daily. Most investigators have noted about a 30 percent complete resolution rate, 30 percent stabilization, and 40 percent failure rate with this technique.197 Many pediatric ophthalmologists prefer this approach. This author has generally found intralesional injection more efficacious; however, the opposite response has been noted in a few cases. There have been a few reports of interferon use in this tumor; however, inter- feron-associated retinopathy has also been described; therefore, the relative safety and efficacy of that approach are uncertain.198,199
If these approaches are not effective, the author has debulked tumors that produce significant ocular morbidity (Figure 1–38). Care is taken to avoid damage to the levator and extraocular muscles, since these capillary hemangiomas are quite diffuse. In this author’s experience, surprisingly, there have not been problems with hemostasis, although in a couple of cases, the author used the CO2 laser to debulk a lesion, with hemostasis. Two series of 5 and 12 cases have used a similar approach, as we have, with good results.196,200 Rarely, a similar process can develop in an adult.200,201
Diagnosis of Lid Tumors |
17 |
Lid Neurofibromas
Plexiform neurofibromas are often observed on the lid of patients with neurofibromatosis. The systemic disease and newer molecular genetics are discussed under “Pediatric Orbital Tumors.” A typical lid neurofibroma is shown in Figure 1–39.167 Often, there is congenital localized hypertrichosis.202 The management of these lesions is difficult. Usually, in large tumors, only incomplete excision is possible, and over time, other eyelid and orbital neurofibromas become clinically detectable. Figures 1–40 and 1–41 show a patient with a large tumor prior to and 1 day after a partial excision.
REFERENCES
1.Preston DS, Stern RS. Nonmelanoma cancers of the skin. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1649–62.
2.Hollander L, Krugh FJ. Cancer of the eyelid. Am J Ophthalmol 1944;27:244–53.
3.Aurora AL, Blodi FC. Lesions of the eyelids. A clinicopathologic study. Surv Ophthalmol 1974;15:94–104.
4.Stetson CG, Schultz MD. Carcinoma of the eyelids: analysis of 301 cases and review of the literature. N Engl J Med 1949;241:725–32.
5.Smith AG, Brockman JL. Epithelial tumors of the eyelids. Am J Ophthalmol 1955;40:522–8.
6.Welch RB, Duke JR. Lesions of the lids: a statistical note. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;45:415–6.
7.Fayos JV, Wildermuth O. Carcinomas of the skin of the eyelids. Arch Ophthalmol 1962;67:298–301.
8.Kopf AW. Computer analysis of 3,500 basal cell carcinomas of the skin. J Dermatol 1979;6:267–81.
9.Ni Z. Histopathological classification of 3,510 cases with eyelid tumors. Chung Hua Yen Ko Tsa Chih 1996;32:435–7.
10.Margo CE, Mulla ZD. Malignant tumors of the eyelid: a population-based study of non-basal cell and nonsquamous cell malignant neoplasms. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:195–8.
11.Miller SJ. Biology of basal cell carcinoma (part II). J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:161–75.
12.Kwa RE, Campana K, Moy RL. Biology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:1–26.
13.Ko CB, Walton S, Keczkes K, et al. The emerging epidemic of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 1994;130: 269–72.
14.Green A, Battistutta D. Incidence of determinants of skin cancer in high-risk Australian population. Int J Cancer 1990;46:356–61.
18 TUMORS OF THE EYE AND OCULAR ADNEXA
15.Fitzpatrick TB, Sober AJ. Sunlight and skin cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;313:818–20.
16.Scotto J, Fears TR, Fraumeni JF. Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute (Publication No. NIH 82- 2433)1981;1–14.
17.Magnus K. The Nordic profile of skin cancer incidence: a comparative epidemiological study of the three main types of skin cancer. Int J Cancer 1991;47:12–19.
18.Gupta AK, Cardella CJ, Haberman HF. Cutaneous malignant neoplasms in patients with renal transplants. Arch Dermatol 1986;122:1288–93.
19.Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1341–8.
20.Cleaver JE. Defective repair replication of DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum. Nature 1968;218:652–6.
21.Gao S, Drouin R, Holmquist GP. DNA repair rates mapped along the human PGK 1 gene at nucleotide resolution. Science 1994;263:1438–40.
22.Tornaletti S, Pfeifer GP. Slow repair of pyrimidine dimers at p53 mutation hotspots in skin cancer. Science 1994;263:1436–8.
23.Brash DE, Seetharam S, Kraemer K, et al. Photoproduct frequency is not the major determinant of UV base substitution hot spots or cold spots in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:3782–6.
24.Anathaswamy HN, Price JE, Goldberg LH, Bales ES. Detection and identification of activated oncogenes in human skin cancers occurring on sun-exposed body sites. Cancer Res 1998;48:3341–6.
25.Suarez HG, Daya-Grosjean L, Schlaifer D, et al. Activated oncogenes in human skin tumors from a repair-deficient syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum. Cancer Res 1989;49:1223–8.
26.Wei Q, Matanoski GM, Farmer ER, et al. DNA repair and aging in basal cell carcinoma: a molecular epidemiology study. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 1993; 90:1614–8.
27.Moriwaki S, Ray S, Tarone RE, et al. The effect of donor age on the processing of UV damaged DNA by cultured human cells: reduced DNA repair capacity and increased DNA mutability. Mutat Res 1996;364:117–26.
28.Cleaver JE, Mitchell DL. UV radiation carcinogenesis. In: Holland JF, Bast RC Jr., Morton DL, et al., editors. Cancer Medicine, 4th edition, Vol. 1. Baltimore: Williamsen & Hickens;1997.
29.Kallassy M, Toftgard R, Ueda M, et al. Patched (ptch)- associated preferential expression of smoothened (smoh) in human basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Cancer Res 1997;57:4731–35.
30.Zaphiropoulos PG, Unden AB, Rahnama F, et al. PTCH2, a novel human patched gene, undergoing alternative splicing and up-regulated in basal cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 1999;59:787–92.
31.Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an incidence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology 1999;106:746–50.
32.Reifler DM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;30:349–65.
33.Lindgren G, Diffey BL, Larko O. Basal cell carcinoma of the eyelids and solar ultraviolet radiation exposure. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1412–5.
34.Gonzalez-Fernandez F, Kaltreider SA, Patnaik BD, et al. Sebaceous carcinoma. Tumor progression through mutational inactivation of p53. Ophthalmology 1998;105:467–506.
35.Einspahr J, Alberts DS, Aickin M, et al. Expression of p53 protein in actinic keratosis, adjacent, normalappearing, and non-sun-exposed human skin. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:583–7.
36.von Hogerlinden M, Rozell BL, Ahrlund-Richter L, Toftgard R. Squamous cell carcinomas and increased apoptosis in skin with inhibited rel/nuclear factor-kb signaling. Cancer Res 1999;59:3299–3303.
37.Fife K, Bower M. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1317–22.
38.Jaffe HW, Pellett PE. Human herpes virus 8 and Kaposi’s sarcoma—some answers, more questions. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1912–3.
39.Gallo RC. The enigmas of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Science 1998;282:1837–9.
40.Rigel DS, Fiedman RJ, Kopt AW. Lifetime risk for develomental skin cancer in US population: current estimate is now 1 in 5. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35:1012–3.
41.Hall HI, Miller DR, Rogers JD, Bewerse B. Update on the incidence and mortality from melanoma in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;40:35–42.
42.Borg A, Johannsson O, Hakansson S, et al. Novel germline p16 mutation in familial malignant melanoma in southern Sweden. Cancer Res 1996; 56:2497–500.
43.Flores JF, Walker GJU, Glendening JM, et al. Loss of the p16INK4a and p15INK4b genes, as well as neighboring 9p21 markers, in sporadic melanoma. Cancer Res 1996;56:5023–32.
44.Bastain BC, LeBoit PE, Hamm H, et al. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1998;58:2170–5.
45.Rook A, Whimster I. Keratoacanthoma—a thirty year retrospective. Br J Dermatol 1979;100:41–7.
46.Kingman J, Callen JP. Keratoacanthoma: a clinical study. Arch Dermatol 1984;120:736–40.
47.Grossniklaus HE, Wojno TH, Yanoff M, Font RL. Invasive keratoacanthoma of the eyelid and ocular adnexa. Opthalmology 1996;103:(6):937–41.
48.Amann J, Spaul CW, Mattfeld T, Lang GK. Eccrine spi-
radenoma of the eyelid. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1999;214:53–4.
49.Mawn LA, Jordan DR, Olberg B. Spindle-cell lipoma of the preseptal eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:174–7.
50.Sharara N, Lee WR, Weir C. Myolipoma of the eyelid. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:630–4.
51.Sandinha T, Lee WR, Reid R. Pleomorphic fibroma of the eyelid. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998; 236:333–8.
52.Huey C, Jakobiec F, Iwamoto T, et al. Discoid lupus erythematosus of the eyelid. Ophthalmology 1983;90: 1389–98.
53.Tosti A, Tosti G, Giovannini A. Discoid lupus erythematosus solely involving the eyelids: report of three cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:259–60.
54.Chikama T, Yoshino H, Nishida T, et al. Langerhans cell histiocytosis localized in the eyelid. Arch Opthalmol 1998;280(10):910–2.
55.Meffert JJ, Kennard CD, Davis TL, Quinn BD. Intradermal nodular fasciitis presenting as an eyelid mass. Int J Dermatol 1996;35:548–52.
56.Kang MC, Chang CH, Su MY, et al. Kimura’s disease of bilateral upper eyelids: a case report. Kao Hsiung I Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsa Chih 1999;15:239–43.
57.Batasakis JG. Melanoma (cutaneous and mucosal) of the head and neck. In: Barsakis JG, editor. Tumors of the head and neck. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1974.
58.Breslow A, Macht SD. Evaluation and prognosis in stage I cutaneous melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;61:342–6.
59.Callen JP, Chanda JJ, Stawiski MA. Malignant melanoma. Arch Dermatol 1978;114:369–70.
60.Kersten RC, Ewing-Chow D, Kulwin DR, Gallon M. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of cutaneous eyelid lesions. Ophthalmology 1997;104:479–84.
61.Mannor GE, Wardell K, Wolfley DE, Nilsson GE. Laser doppler perfusion imaging of eyelid skin. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;12:178–85.
62.Bargon K, Curling OM, Paridaens ADA, Hungerford JL. The role of cytology in the diagnosis of periocular basal cell carcinomas. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;12:190–5.
63.Milverton EJ. A survey of basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Austral J Ophthalmol 1997;5:106–8.
64.Lund HZ. Tumors of the skin. Washington DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1957. Sect I, Fasc 2: p. 205–34.
65.Karcioglu ZA, al-Hussain H, Svedberg AH. Cystic basal cell carcinoma of the orbit and eyelids. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:134–40.
66.Bonner PK, Bergman DK, McLean IW, LaPiana FG. Mixed type basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:216–21.
Diagnosis of Lid Tumors |
19 |
67.Hunt MJ, Halliday GM, Weedon D, et al. Regression in basal cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical analysis. Br J Dermatol 1994;130:1–8.
68.Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated (primary) basal cell carcinoma: implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989;15:315–28.
69.Kahn HS, Tatham LM, Patel AV, et al. Increased cancer mortality following a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer. JAMA 1998;280:910–2.
70.Payne JW, Duke JR, Butner R, Elfrig DE. Basal cell carcinoma of the eyelids: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;81:553–8.
71.Howard GR, Nerad JA, Carter KD, Whitaker DC. Clinical characteristics associated with orbital invasion of cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell tumors of the eyelid. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:123–33.
72.Aldred WV, Ramierez VG, Nicholson DH. Intraocular invasion by basal cell carcinoma of the lid. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:1821–2.
73.Moro F, De Caro R, De Caro G, Ninfo V. Eyelid basal cell carcinoma with intracranial extension. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:56–76.
74.Beadles CF. Rodent ulcer. Trans Pathol Soc London 1984;45:176–81.
75.Conley J, Sachs ME, Romo T, et al. Metastatic basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:78–85.
76.Wieman TJ, Shively EH, Woodcock TM. Responsiveness of metastatic basal cell carcinoma to chemotherapy. A case report. Cancer 1983;52:1583–85.
77.Lo JS, Snow SN, Reizner GT, et al. Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: report of twelve cases with a review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;24:715–9.
78.Weinstock MA, Bogaars HA, Ashley M, et al. Nonmelanoma skin cancer mortality, a population based study. Arch Dermatol 1991;127:1194–7.
79.Boniuk M, Zimmerman LE. Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid, eyebrow, caruncle, and orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1968;72:619–42.
80.Ni C, Kuo PK. Meibomian gland carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 156 cases with long-period followup of 100 cases. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1979;23:388–401.
81.Doxanas MT, Green WR. Sebaceous gland carcinoma. Review of 40 cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102: 245–9.
82.Cavanagh HD, Green WR, Goldberg HK. Multicentric sebaceous adenocarcinoma of the meibomian gland. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;77:326-32.
83.Russell WG, Page DL, Hough AJ, Rogers LW. Sebaceous carcinoma of meibomian gland origin: the diagnostic importance of pagetoid spread of neoplastic cells. Am J Clin Pathol 1980;73:504–11.
84.Rao N, Hidayat AA, McLean IW, Zimmerman LE. Sebaceous carcinomas of the ocular adnexa: a clin-
- #28.03.202639.38 Mб0The Wills Eye Manual Office and Emergency Room Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Disease_Gerstenblith, Rabinowitz_2012.chm
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #
- #28.03.202681.2 Mб0Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit 2nd edition_Coleman, Silverman, Lizzi_2006.pdb
- #
- #
- #
- #28.03.202621.35 Mб0Uveitis Fundamentals and Clinical Practice 4th edition_Nussenblatt, Whitcup_2010.chm
