Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases_Mallajosyula_2009

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
22.95 Mб
Скачать

be differentiated from prolapsed orbital fat since they are often well circumscribed, slightly more yellow, and displace orbital structures.57 (Figures 12.2A to D) They present commonly in mid-life, are more frequent in men, are not related to race, and after an initial growth phase typically do not change in size significantly.58,59 Lipomas are divided into deep and subcutaneous/superficial lesions which are much more common.

Mesenchymal Tumors 173

Lipomas are identical to subcutaneous fat on CT and MRI.17 In the orbit they can have lower density than the surrounding orbital fat simulating a cyst.57 When the tumor is encapsulated a low signal fibrous capsule may be visualized on MR and CT.17 Nonencapuslated lipomas have been reported making it difficult to localize them when adjacent to normal fat.67

A

B

C

D

Figures 12.2A to D: (A) This 21-year-old female noted a nonpainful, mildly tender swelling of the left lower lid for 2 years. There was no history or findings of increase in size with Valsalva maneuver and no ecchymotic episodes. On physical examination, the vision was normal. There was a soft palpable mass not attached to the underlying tissue with 2 mm of vertical displacement and 1.5 mm of relative enophthalmos.

Ocular movements were normal. (B, C) CT scan demonstrated a well-delineated low-density lesion anteriorly (C-large arrow). The lesion appeared to be adjacent to orbital fat, which was of a higher density (C-small arrow). The lesion also appeared to cause bone excavation anteriorly (B-arrow). It was thought to be a lipomatous tumor. At the time of excision, a well-defined lipomatous mass was removed en bloc from the inferolateral orbit. (D) Histologically, it had the typical features of a lipoma. Reprinted with permission from Shah NB, Chang WY, White VA, et al. Orbital lipoma:2 cases and review of the literature. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2007;23:203

64-66

174 Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases

Liposarcoma is one the most common soft tissue sarcomas of adult life,14 but is rare in the orbit.1,60 Thirty five cases have been reported in the literature, but misclassification is likely since our definition and pathological evaluation has improved over time.61,62 In orbital cases the average age was 64 years of age with a female predilection.55 The most common presentation is painless proptosis with an 8 month mean duration of symptoms.55 Three distinct entities have been described, each validated with cytogenetic evidence. In order of good to poor prognosis they are: well-differentiated (adipocytic, sclerosing, inflammatory, spindle cell, and dedifferentiated), myxoid/round cell, and pleomorphic.14,63 In the orbit the myxoid is the most common subtype.62 Unlike lipomas which are primarily subcutaneous in location liposarcomas are primarily deep tumors; if they occur superficially they are referred to as atypical and have an excellent prognosis since they are often amenable to complete surgical resection. It is generally believed that lipomas cannot transform into liposarcomas; the distinction in location between lipomas and liposarcomas is the primary argument cited as proof of this.14 Clinical and histopathologic diagnosis can be difficult. Treatment involves surgical excision which typically involves exenteration, although well circumscribed cases have been resected. Liposarcomas of the orbit have a favorable prognosis with no reports of a neoplasm, that meets today’s histopathological criteria for diagnosis, metastasizing and only one recurring locally.61,62

When a lesion with imaging characteristics similar to a lipoma with an adjacent non-fatty mass, liposarcoma should be added to the differential diagnosis. Liposarcomas vary from approximately a 25-75% fatty component depending on their level of differentiation.68 Liposarcomas also show calcification in approximately 12% of cases which is more common than in lipomas.17 Few papers have described the imaging in the orbit. Jakobiec et al. described central lucency due to fat seen on CT imaging resembling a cystic structure.61 They also reported that these lesions commonly involved the extraocular muscles and one case was hyperintense on MRI T1 imaging.61 A single case report described unique characteristics including an extraconal mass with MRI T2 imaging showing hypointensity in comparison to cerebral cortex and light peripheral enhancement with gadolinium.54

Lesions shown to mimic fatty tumors on imaging include myxoid tumors, lesions associated with a subacute hematoma, muscle with fatty replacement, and tumors invading surrounding fat.17

Fibrous Tissue Tumors

Despite the large number of subtypes of fibrous tumors, only a few have been reported in the orbit. Fibrosarcomas have been diagnosed much less commonly over time as our definition and pathological assessment has advanced.14 Recent series have found that they are slightly more common in men69 and usually present in the early 40’s.70, 71 Recurrence is very common occurring in approximately 45% with surgical margins being the best predictor.69 Scott et al.’s series found that recurrence occurred in 79% of tumors with inadequate margins and in 18% of those treated with wide or radical excision.69 Five year metastasis rates are around 63% and are typically to the lung, spine, and skull.69 A 5 years survival rate of approximately 40% has been reported.69 These lesions are rare as a primary tumor of the orbit but they can also invade from the nasal cavity or face. Exenteration or excision with wide local margins is recommended since they are commonly incompletely removed. CT and MR imaging typically show an aggressively infiltrating orbital mass,72 however infantile lesions have been reported to be well circumscribed.73

Solitary fibrous tumor classically occurs in the pleural lining of the lung, but has been described throughout the body including the orbit, adjacent nasal cavity and sinuses.14 Approximately 55 cases have been reported in the orbit since its first description there in 1994 with most cases being benign.74-76 It has been seen in all age groups, with a median age of 50,77 and usually presents as a wellcircumscribed yet unencapsulated lesion causing gradual proptosis.1 Pleural solitary fibrous tumor can vary greatly in its clinical characteristics and malignancy on pathological assessment. Even less is known about non-pleural solitary fibrous tumors. Approximately 10% of non-pleural lesions have been shown to recur and metastases are very rare.78 Pathological assessment for atypical features was found to be a significant predictor of recurrence.78 Since these tumors are difficult to remove due to invasion and they may undergo malignant transformation en bloc resection is recommended.79

85-87

On CT the lesions are well circumscribed and take up contrast intensely in a homogeneous or ring pattern,76 although one review suggests that contrast uptake is mild to moderate.72 With MRI these tumors also enhance intensely, commonly showing areas of hemorrhage and T2 hypointensity.72

Histiocytic Tumors Fibrous histiocytoma

Fibrous histiocytomas histologically and clinically can vary from a slowly developing benign to locally aggressive fast growing malignant lesion. Four subtypes have been described in order of frequency: storiform-pleomorphic, myxoid (myxoidfibrosarcoma), giant cell (malignant giant cell tumor of soft parts), and inflammatory (xanthosarcoma, malignant xanthogranuloma).14 Benign fibrous histiocytoma most commonly affects the skin but approximately 0.3% can occur in deeper locations such as muscle tissue.80 Recurrence rates for benign cutaneous fibrous histiocytomas following excision range from 5-10%,14,81 with deeper tumors typically presenting as a much larger lesion more often resulting in incomplete resection and thus recurrence rates have been reported closer to 50%.82,83

Malignant fibrous histiocytomas are the most common adult malignant soft tissue tumor in the body.84 Font et al.’s orbital series found that 63% were benign, 26% were locally aggressive and 11% were malignant.82 They showed that if the tumor had infiltrative margins, hypercellular zones or both, recurrence rates were 57% compared to 31% in those that did not have these features.82 Typically they are slow-growing, firm, infiltrative, and present in the upper nasal quadrant with a mean age of 43 years.82 Common presenting symptoms include proptosis (60%), mass (46%), and decreased vision (25%) with a mean duration of symptoms of 29 months.82 Complete surgical excision is recommended. This is typically accomplished by removing the tumor alone although in some infiltrative cases this might not be possible without exenteration. Recent large systemic series have reported recurrence rates from 19-21%, metastasis, mostly to lung and bone, in 31-35%, and 5 year survival rates from 65-70%. In contrast

Mesenchymal Tumors 175

ten year survival rates for orbital tumors is about 90%.1,82

It can be difficult to differentiate fibrous from other lesions.17,72 (Figures 12.3A and B) No specific ultrasonic and CT imaging characteristics have been found (Figures 12.4A to E).88 Imaging is also highly variable related to amounts of collagen, necrosis, hemorrhage, and myxoid tissue but often displays high signal intensity on T2. Benign tumors are typically well-circumscribed and may remodel bone, with malignant lesions typically having infiltrating margins and bone destruction.72 Benign histiocytomas are usually homogeneous on CT, and MRI T1 and T2 imaging, whereas malignant lesions have a more heterogeneous pattern.72 In some cases malignant lesions may have a homogeneous CT and T1 image with a heterogeneous T2 image.72 Histopathology and immunohistiochemistry help in the diagnosis (Figures 12.5A and B)

Malignant Tumors of Uncertain Type

Rhabdoid tumor is a highly aggressive neoplasm primarily seen in the kidney although it has been reported in extrarenal sites including the central nervous system and soft tissues including the orbit.14,89-96 Extrarenal sites have approximately a 15% survival, but there are too few reported cases in the orbit to come to a conclusion as to whether they behave differently than other extrarenal sites. Of the 7 described in the orbit 4 have died.

A

B

Figures 12.3A and B: (A) This 34-year-old woman presented with a history of right upper lid swelling and ptosis over 1 year, which was associated with tearing, light sensitivity and occasional sharp pain.

Physical examination findings were a palpable lacrimal gland on the right, bilateral reduced Schirmer's function, 3 mm of ptosis and 3 mm of proptosis. There was a soft nontender mass superolaterally, which was causing a 3 mm downward and 4 mm inward displacement as well as indentation of the globe, leading to elevation of macula and disc (B)

176 Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases

A

B

C

D

E

Figures 12.4A to E: (A, B) The ultrasound for the patient depicted a well-defined solid lacrimal mass indenting the globe. (C to E) CT scan demonstrated a well-defined, solid, enhancing, slightly bosselated mass that indents the globe and causes excavation of the adjacent lacrimal fossa. The mass appeared distinct from the lacrimal gland and enhanced to a greater degree

A

B

Figures 12.5A and B: The patient underwent an excision biopsy of the lesion, which at the time of surgery appeared yellow and soft. It was excised from the adjacent lacrimal gland. (A, B) Histologically, it was an encapsulated, somewhat myxomatous, vascular spindle cell lesion, which was negative for S100, keratin and epithelial membrane antigen but positive for smooth muscle antigen, vimentin and CD34. The histologic differential diagnosis included fibrous histiocytoma, myxoid tumor or leiomyoma

REFERENCES

1.Rootman, J, Diseases of the Orbit: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2nd ed. 2003, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

2.Russell, WO, et al. A clinical and pathological staging system for soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer, 1977;(4):1562-70.

3.Masson, JK and EH Soule, Embryonal rhabdomyo-sarcoma of the head and neck. Report on eighty-eight cases. Am J Surg, 1965;110(4):585-91.

4.Maurer, HM, et al., The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-I. A final report. Cancer, 1988;61(2):209-20.

5.Maurer, HM, et al., The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-II. Cancer, 1993;71(5):1904-22.

6.Crist W, et al., The Third Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. J Clin Oncol, 1995;13(3):610-30.

7.Ashton, N and G Morgan, Embryonal sarcoma and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the orbit. J Clin Pathol, 1965;18(6):699-714.

8.La Quaglia, MP, et al., The effect of age at diagnosis on outcome in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer, 1994;73(1): 109-17.

9.Jones, IS, AB Reese, and J Kraut, Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. An analysis of 62 cases. Am J Ophthalmol, 1966;61(4):721-36.

10.Jones, IS, AB Reese, and J Krout, Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma: an analysis of sixty-two cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 1965;63:223-55.

11.Furlong, MA, T Mentzel, and JC Fanburg-Smith, Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: a clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers. Mod Pathol, 2001;14(6)595-603.

12.Newton, WA, Jr, et al., Classification of rhabdomyosarcomas and related sarcomas. Pathologic aspects and proposal for a new classification—an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Cancer, 1995;76(6):1073-85.

13.Howard, GM and VG Casten, Rhabdomyosarcoma of The Orbit In Brothers. Arch Ophthalmol, 1963;70:319-22.

14.Weiss, ww and JR Goldblum, Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors (4th ed) 2001, ST. Louis: Mosby.

15.Shields, CL, et al., Clinical spectrum of primary ophthalmic rhabdomyosarcoma. Ophthalmology, 2001;108(12):228492.

16.Sohaib, SA, I Moseley, and JE Wright, Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma—the radiological characteristics. Clin Radiol, 1998;53(5):357-62.

17.Krandsdorf, MJ and MD Murphrey, Imaging of Soft Tissue Tumors (2nd ed) 2006, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Williams.

18.Simmons, M and AK Tucker, The radiology of bone changes in rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin Radiol, 1978;29(1): 47-52.

19.Kirkpatrick, JA and MA Capitanio, Radiology of the orbit in infancy and childhood. Radiol Clin North Am, 1972;10(1): 143-66.

Mesenchymal Tumors 177

20.Mafee, MF, E Pai, and B Philip, Rhabdomyosarcoma of the orbit. Evaluation with MR imaging and CT. Radiol Clin North Am, 1998;36(6):1215-27, xii.

21.Parham, DM and FG Barr, WHO classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics: Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. 2002, Lyon, France: IARC Press. 146-49.

22.Raney, RB, Jr, et al., Disease patterns and survival rate in children with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-I. Cancer, 1988;62(7):1257-66.

23.Crist, WM, et al., Prognosis in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: a report of the intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies I and II. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Committee. J Clin Oncol, 1990;8(3): 443-52.

24.Newton, WA, Jr, et al., Histopathology of childhood sarcomas, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Studies I and

II:clinicopathologic correlation. J Clin Oncol, 1988;6(1): 67-75.

25.Breneman, JC and ES Wiener, Issues in the local control of rhabdomyosarcoma. Med Pediatr Oncol, 2000;35(2):104-9.

26.Baker, KS, et al., Benefit of intensified therapy for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: results from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV. J Clin Oncol, 2000;18(12):2427-34.

27.Martelli, H, et al., Conservative treatment for girls with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma of the genital tract: A report from the Study Committee of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(7):211722.

28.Baldini, EH, et al., Long-term outcomes after functionsparing surgery without radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. J Clin Oncol, 1999;17(10):3252-9.

29.Oberlin, O, et al., Treatment of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma: survival and late effects of treatment—results of an international workshop. J Clin Oncol, 2001;19(1):197-204.

30.McDowell, HP, Update on childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. Arch Dis Child, 2003;88(4):354-7.

31.Mannor, GE, et al., Multidisciplinary management of refractory orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. Ophthalmology, 1997;104(7)1198-201.

32.Raney, RB, et al., Late effects of therapy in 94 patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma of the orbit: Report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-III, 19841991. Med Pediatr Oncol, 2000;34(6)413-20.

33.Heyn, R, et al., Second malignant neoplasms in children treated for rhabdomyosarcoma. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Committee. J Clin Oncol, 1993. 11(2):262-70.

34.Knowles, DM, 2nd and FA Jakobiec, Rhabdomyoma of the orbit. Am J Ophthalmol, 1975;80(6):1011-8.

35.Di Sant’Agnese, PA and DM Knowles, 2nd, Extracardiac rhabdomyoma: a clinicopathologic study and review of the literature. Cancer, 1980;46(4):780-9.

178 Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases

36.Hatsukawa, Y, et al., Rhabdomyoma of the orbit in a child. Am J Ophthalmol, 1997;123(1):142-4.

37.Myung, J, et al, Rhabdomyoma of the orbit: a case report. Pediatr Radiol, 2002;32(8):589-92.

38.Mavrikakis, I, et al., Orbital mesenchymal hamartoma with rhabdomyomatous features. Br J Ophthalmol, 2007;91(5): 692-3.

39.DiMario, FJ, Jr, et al., Evolution of cardiac rhabdomyoma in tuberous sclerosis complex. Clin Pediatr (Phila), 1996; 35(12):615-9.

40.Fukuda, Y, et al., Rhabdomyoma of the base of the tongue. J Laryngol Otol, 2003;117(6):503-7.

41.Metheetrairut, C, et al., Pharyngeal rhabdomyoma: a clinico-pathological study. J Otolaryngol, 1992;21(4):25761.

42.Ho, VT and VM Rao, Recurrent adult-type pharyngeal rhabdomyoma: MR appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1992;159(5):1130-1.

43.Arat, YO, et al., Leiomyoma of the orbit and periocular region: a clinicopathologic study of four cases. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005;21(1):16-22.

44.Farman, AG, Benign smooth muscle tumours. S Afr Med J, 1975;49(33):1333-40.

45.Gustafson, P, et al., Soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. A population-based epidemiologic and prognostic study of 48 patients, including cellular DNA content. Cancer, 1992;70(1):114-9.

46.Hashimoto, H, et al., Leiomyosarcoma of the external soft tissues. A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic study. Cancer, 1986;57(10):2077-88.

47.Shmookler, BM and DH Lauer, Retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma. A clinicopathologic analysis of 36 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 1983;7(3):269-80.

48.Font, RL, S Jurco, 3rd, and RJ Brechner, Postradiation leiomyosarcoma of the orbit complicating bilateral retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 1983;101(10):1557-61.

49.Folberg, R, et al., Orbital leiomyosarcoma after radiation therapy for bilateral retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 1983;101(10):1562-5.

50.Farshid, G, et al., Leiomyosarcoma of somatic soft tissues: a tumor of vascular origin with multivariate analysis of outcome in 42 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 2002;26(1):14-24.

51.Jakobiec, FA, et al., Leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma of the orbit. Am J Ophthalmol, 1975;80(6):1028-42.

52.Wojno, T, RR Tenzel, and M Nadji, Orbital leiomyosarcoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 1983;101(10):1566-8.

53.Meekins, BB, JJ Dutton, and AD Proia, Primary orbital leiomyosarcoma. A case report and review of the literature. Arch Ophthalmol, 1988;106(1):82-6.

54.Hou, LC, MA Murphy, and GA Tung, Primary orbital leiomyosarcoma: a case report with MRI findings. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003;135(3):408-10.

55.Lin, IC, et al., Primary orbital leiomyosarcoma. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005;21(6):451-3.

56.Sturgis, EM and BO Potter, Sarcomas of the head and neck region. Curr Opin Oncol, 2003;15(3):239-52.

57.Shah, NB, et al., Orbital lipoma: 2 cases and review of literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007;23(3):202-5.

58.Rydholm, A and NO Berg, Size, site and clinical incidence of lipoma. Factors in the differential diagnosis of lipoma and sarcoma. Acta Orthop Scand, 1983;54(6):929-34.

59.Solvonuk, PF, et al., Correlation of morphologic and biochemical observations in human lipomas. Lab Invest, 1984;51(4):469-74.

60.Shields, JA, et al., Classification and incidence of spaceoccupying lesions of the orbit. A survey of 645 biopsies. Arch Ophthalmol, 1984;102(11):1606-11.

61.Jakobiec, FA, et al., Primary liposarcoma of the orbit. Problems in the diagnosis and management of five cases. Ophthalmology, 1989;96(2):180-91.

62.Cai, YC, et al., Primary liposarcoma of the orbit: a clinicopathologic study of seven cases. Ann Diagn Pathol, 2001;5(5)255-66.

63.Fletcher, CDM, Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors (2nd ed) CDM Fletcher. 2000, London: Churchill Livingstone.

64.Linehan, DC, et al., Influence of biologic factors and anatomic site in completely resected liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol, 2000;18(8):1637-43.

65.Evans, HL, EH Soule, and RK Winkelmann, Atypical lipoma, atypical intramuscular lipoma, and well differentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a reappraisal of 30 cases formerly classified as well differentiated liposarcoma. Cancer, 1979;43(2):574-84.

66.Kindblom, LG, L Angervall, and AS Fassina, Atypical lipoma. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand [A], 1982. 90(1):27-36.

67.Roberts, CC, PT Liu, and TV Colby, Encapsulated versus nonencapsulated superficial fatty masses: a proposed MR imaging classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2003;180(5): 1419-22.

68.Kransdorf, MJ, et al., Imaging of fatty tumors: distinction of lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma. Radiology, 2002;224(1):99-104.

69.Scott, SM, et al., Soft tissue fibrosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 132 cases. Cancer, 1989;64(4):925-31.

70.Pack, GT and IM Ariel, Fibrosarcoma of the soft somatic tissues; a clinical and pathologic study. Surgery, 1952;31(3): 443-78.

71.Pritchard, DJ, et al., Fibrosarcoma of bone and soft tissues of the trunk and extremities. Orthop Clin North Am, 1977. 8(4):869-81.

72.Dalley, RW, Fibrous histiocytoma and fibrous tissue tumors of the orbit. Radiol Clin North Am, 1999;37(1):185-94.

73.Lee, MJ, et al., Congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma: magnetic resonance imaging findings. Can Assoc Radiol J, 1996;47(2): 121-5.

74.Westra, WH, WL Gerald, and J Rosai, Solitary fibrous tumor. Consistent CD34 immunoreactivity and occurrence in the orbit. Am J Surg Pathol, 1994;18(10):992-8.

75.Cerda-Nicolas, M, et al., Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit: morphological, cytogenetic and molecular features. Neuropathology, 2006;26(6):557-63.

76.Meyer, D and F Riley, Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit: a clinicopathologic entity that warrants both a heightened awareness and an atraumatic surgical removal technique. Orbit, 2006;25(1):45-50.

77.Dictor, M, et al., Myofibromatosis-like hemangiopericytoma metastasizing as differentiated vascular smoothmuscle and myosarcoma. Myopericytes as a subset of “myofibroblasts”. Am J Surg Pathol, 1992;16(12):1239-47.

78.Vallat-Decouvelaere, AV, SM Dry, and CD Fletcher, Atypical and malignant solitary fibrous tumors in extrathoracic locations: evidence of their comparability to intra-thoracic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol, 1998;22(12):150111.

79.Bernardini, FP, et al., Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit: is it rare? Report of a case series and review of the literature. Ophthalmology, 2003;110(7):1442-8.

80.Fletcher, CD, Benign fibrous histiocytoma of subcutaneous and deep soft tissue: a clinicopathologic analysis of 21 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 1990;14(9):801-9.

81.Niemi, KM, The benign fibrohistiocytic tumours of the skin. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh), 1970;50(63):Suppl 63: 1-66.

82.Font, RL and AA Hidayat, Fibrous histiocytoma of the orbit. A clinicopathologic study of 150 cases. Hum Pathol, 1982;13(3):199-209.

83.Franquemont, DW, et al., Benign fibrous histiocytoma of the skin with potential for local recurrence: a tumor to be distinguished from dermatofibroma. Mod Pathol, 1990; 3(2):158-63.

Mesenchymal Tumors 179

84.Enzinger, FM, Malignant fibrous histiocytoma 20 years after Stout. Am J Surg Pathol, 1986. 10 Suppl 1:43-53.

85.Salo, JC, et al., Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the extremity. Cancer, 1999;85(8):1765-72.

86.Le Doussal, V, et al., Prognostic factors for patients with localized primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a multicenter study of 216 patients with multivariate analysis. Cancer, 1996;77(9):1823-30.

87.Zagars, GK, JR Mullen, and A. Pollack, Malignant fibrous histiocytoma: outcome and prognostic factors following conservation surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1996;34(5):983-94.

88.Jacomb-Hood, J and IF Moseley, Orbital fibrous histiocytoma: computed tomography in 10 cases and a review of radiological findings. Clin Radiol, 1991;43(2): 117-20.

89.Haas, JE, et al., Ultrastructure of malignant rhabdoid tumor of the kidney. A distinctive renal tumor of children. Hum Pathol, 1981;12(7):646-57.

90.Sotelo-Avila, C, et al., Renal and extrarenal rhabdoid tumors in children: a clinicopathologic study of 14 patients. Semin Diagn Pathol, 1986;3(2):151-63.

91.Stidham, DB, et al., Congenital malignant rhabdoid tumor of the orbit. J Aapos, 1999;3(5):318-20.

92.Walford, N, et al., Intraorbital rhabdoid tumour following bilateral retinoblastoma. Histopathology, 1992;20(2):170-3.

93.Gunduz, K, et al., Malignant rhabdoid tumor of the orbit. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998;116(2):243-6.

94.Rootman, J, KF Damji, and JE Dimmick, Malignant rhabdoid tumor of the orbit. Ophthalmology, 1989;96(11): 1650-4.

95.Niffenegger, JH, et al., Adult extrarenal rhabdoid tumor of the lacrimal gland. Ophthalmology, 1992;99(4):567-74.

96.Gottlieb, C, et al., Congenital orbital and disseminated extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005;21(1):76-9.

180 Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases

13

Bone Tumors of Orbit

C H A P T E R

 

 

Venkatesh C Prabhakaran, Dinesh Selva

Primary bone tumors of the orbit constitute 0.6 to 2.0% of all orbital tumors.1, 2 They can be classified into 4 main sub-groups (Table 1).3 Clinically, the commonest bone tumors encountered are osteomas, fibrous dysplasia and cholesterol granuloma.

Clinical Presentation

Bony lesions of the orbit usually present in one of three ways:3

1.Gradual proptosis and globe displacement occurring over many years secondary to a slowly progressive non-infiltrative mass effect. This is commonly seen in benign fibro-osseous tumors, such as the osteoma.

2.Sub-acute proptosis or globe displacement occurring over weeks or months which may be complicated by a sudden increase in the signs and symptoms secondary to an intralesional hemorrhage. This presentation is characteristic of reactive bone lesions.

3.Malignant bone tumors can present with infiltrative signs such as pain, restricted

movements and decreased vision occurring over weeks or months.

On radiological examination, either destruction of bone or hyperostosis is seen. It is important to note that lesions other than primary bone tumors can also cause these changes. Thus the differential diagnosis of a destructive bony lesion includes epithelial malignancies of the paranasal sinuses, bony metastases, Wegener’s granulomatosis, lymphomas, fibrosarcoma and lytic meningioma. Hyperostotic lesions may be seen in metastatic prostatic carcinoma, meningioma and osteomyelitis.

Only the three commonest lesions (osteoma, fibrous dysplasia and cholesterol granuloma) will be discussed in detail. The other conditions are briefly reviewed.

Osteoma

Osteomas are the commonest bony tumors affecting the orbit. Orbital osteomas usually arise in the frontal or ethmoidal sinus. They usually present in the fourth and fifth decades and occur equally in males and females.4

Table 1: Clinico-pathological classification of primary orbital bone disorders

Benign fibro-osseus and

Reactive bone lesions

Neoplasms

Vascular

cartilaginous lesions

 

 

 

Osteoma

Cholesterol granuloma

Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis

Intraosseus hemangioma

Fibrous dysplasia

Aneurysmal bone cyst

Myeloma

 

Ossifying fibroma

Giant cell granuloma

Osteosarcoma

 

Chondroma

Brown tumor of

Ewing’s sarcoma

 

 

hyperparathyroidism

 

 

Osteoblastoma

 

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma

 

 

 

Giant cell tumor

 

 

 

 

 

Clinically, osteomas cause gradual proptosis and globe displacement occurring over many years. There may be an associated headache and a bony mass is usually palpable in the superior or superomedial orbit. Obstruction of the sinus ostia may lead to sinusitis or mucocoele formation. Uncommon features include acquired Brown’s syndrome, gazeevoked amaurosis or pain, globe subluxation and erosion leading to orbital emphysema or CSF rhinorrhea. Osteomas of the sphenoid sinus, though rare, are important as they can cause an orbital apex syndrome and optic atrophy.3

An important systemic association is Gardner’s syndrome which is a phenotypic variant of the familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Gardner’s syndrome is an autosomal dominant condition whose features include colonic polyps, osteomas, and congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE). As the rate of malignant transformation of the colonic polyps is very high, screening for Gardner’s syndrome (dilated funduscopic examination and gastroenterologist referral) is recommended in patients with osteoma.5

On X-ray and CT scans, osteomas are extremely radiodense, well circumscribed lesions, usually arising in the sinus and invading the orbit. Bone windows on CT usually show a very dense periphery with a more radiolucent center.

Histologically, osteomas are composed of lamellar bone with fibrovascular stroma. They are divided into three types: ivory, compact and fibrous osteomas based on the relative proportions of lamellar bone and fibrous stroma.6 The ivory osteomas are considered to be the most mature form of the lesion. However, there does not seem to be a correlation between clinical behavior and histological subtype.3

Asymptomatic osteomas are treated conservatively, except when involving the sphenoidal sinus, as it is easier to remove a small lesion before it encroaches on the optic canal.

When symptomatic, treatment is by surgical excision. Anterior lesions are removed via an anterior orbitotomy. A modified Lynch incision may be used for superomedial osteomas. Endoscopic techniques may also be used.7 Posterior lesions may require a combined orbitocranial approach. Recurrence is rare, even following partial removal.

Bone Tumors of Orbit 181

CASE ILLUSTRATION (Figures 13.1A to D)

Fibrous Dysplasia

Fibrous dysplasia develops almost exclusively in children in the first two decades of life, though the disease may progress well into adulthood. It is a deforming but not destructive disease of bone and is caused by proliferation of fibrous tissue and osteoid in medullary bone.

Three forms are described: monostotic fibrous dysplasia accounts for most cases of orbital involvement; in polyostotic disease, deformities of long bones occur together with skull lesions; and McCune-Albright syndrome which is a triad of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, sexual precocity and cutaneous pigmentation (with ‘coast of Maine’ borders).

Most patients present with facial asymmetry, proptosis and globe displacement progressing over many years. Associated symptoms include diplopia, anosmia, hearing defects, nasal obstruction and epiphora.8 Increased intracranial pressure and cranial nerve palsies can also occur. Extensive disease results in a deformed facies known as ‘leontiasis ossea’.

Progressive disease can result in optic nerve compression. Acute compressive neuropathy may occur secondary to intralesional hemorrhage, sphenoidal sinus mucocoele or secondary aneurysmal bone cyst.3

Imaging shows expansion of the bone with thinning of the overlying cortex. A ‘ground-glass’ appearance is common on CT. The disease usually affects multiple orbital bones, extending across suture lines.

The main differential diagnosis is hyperostotic meningioma, which occurs in an older age group, and is differentiated on imaging by the presence of a soft tissue component.

Histopathology shows a loose, moderately cellular fibrous stroma containing spicules of woven bone often with characteristic ‘C’ or ‘Chinese character’ shapes. Osteoblastic activity is inconspicuous.6

As the natural history of the lesion is usually one of slow progression, a conservative approach to management is recommended, unless functional

182 Surgical Atlas of Orbital Diseases

A

B

C

D

Figures 13.1A to D: A 19-year-old male presented with a dull headache and a swelling in the region of the left upper lid. On clinical examination

(A), fullness was noted above the left medial canthus with downward displacement of the globe. A bony-hard mass could be palpated in the left superomedial orbit. Computed tomographic scan (B and C) revealed a highly circumscribed radio-opaque mass with a bosselated contour occupying the frontal sinus and extending into the left superonasal orbit. The bone window settings (B and C) demonstrated the radiolucent trabecular center surrounded by a dense periphery, characteristic of an osteoma. Surgical removal was performed using a stereotactic assisted sino-orbital approach. The sinus component was removed by a nasal endoscopic approach following a modified Lothrop procedure.

The orbital component was drilled out through an external skin-crease approach. (D). The patient made an uneventful recovery following surgery

deficits develop. Surgical treatment requires a multidisciplinary craniofacial approach, with removal of as much of the affected bone as possible and reconstruction of the resulting defect in a single operation.9

CASE ILLUSTRATION (Figures 13.2A to D)

Ossifying Fibroma

This is a lesion peculiar to craniofacial bones. The mandible is the site of predilection but the orbit (usually the roof) may rarely be involved.6 It usually

presents in the first two decades of life with a very slowly progressive displacement of the globe. Imaging shows a well circumscribed lesion eroding the bone with a sclerotic margin and foci of internal calcification.

Histopathology reveals trabeculae of bone and osteoid lined by osteoblasts in a cellular stroma.6 A ‘psammomatoid’ variant is described, in which ossicles remniscent of psammoma bodies are seen.10 This variant shows more aggressive behavior and has a greater risk of recurrence following incomplete excision.