Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery_Natarajan, Hussain_2008
.pdf
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
Introduction
Neovascularization is one of the key morbid manifestations of ocular pathologies, especially diabetic retinopathy (DR). The current gold standard for effective therapy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), but associated with inherent tissue destruction. Hence, the need to investigate novel therapies that may yield similar, if not greater efficacy associated with less tissue damage.
Neovascularization and VEGF—The Nexus
The stimuli for ocular neovascularization are multiple, though ischemia has been implicated primarily.1 The microvascular occlusion, one of the pathophysiological hallmarks of diabetic retinopathy, results in ischemia-driven release of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).1,2 VEGF causes various events at the microvascular level , namely increased vascular permeability leading to diabetic macular edema, and formation of new blood vessels or the proliferative stage of DR. Intraocular VEGF levels correlate well with the severity of neovascularisation in PDR.3 Essentially a peptide growth factor, alternative messenger RNA splicing and post-translational modification produces at least 6 different VEGF isoforms, of which VEGF-165 is the major pathogenic form. VEGF acts by binding to the 2 membrane-bound tyrosine kinase VEGF receptors (VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2). Neovascularization is largely due to VEGFR-2 blockage. The ligand binding results in dimerization and phosphorylation of the receptor with activation of intracellular signaling mechanisms leading to vascular endothelial cell proliferation and migration.4
A number of anti-VEGF therapies are currently being investigated and are under trial.
The Anti-VEGF Triumvirate
The three anti-VEGF agents in use are:
i.Bevacizumab (Avastin)—A 149-kDa humanized, monoclonal, recombinant full-length antibody. It has approval for use as an intravenous chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of colorectal cancers.5 It binds all the VEGF isoforms. Although not approved for intraocular use, its low-cost high efficacy profile has made it the most popular anti-VEGF agent today. 6 The commonly used dose for injection is 1.25 mg/0.05 ml.
ii.Ranibizumab (Lucentis)—A 48-kDa humanized, monoclonal, recombinant antibody fragment (Fab). It has gained approval for use as intravitreal medication for neovascular age related macular degeneration (ARMD). 0.5 mg/0.05 ml was determined to be the most efficacious dose.7
iii.Pegaptanib sodium (Macugen)—A pegylated RNA aptamer, it specifically binds the VEGF165 isoform.8 The first anti-VEGF agent to obtain FDA approval for intraocular use (in exudative ARMD). It is administered in a dose of 0.3 mg/0.09 ml.
The Role of Anti-VEGF Agents in PDR
As stated before, owing to its low-cost, ease of access and high efficacy, most of the evidence in 40 literature for the use of anti-VEGF agents in PDR stems from reports on bevacizumab.
Anti-VEGF Therapy in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
FLORID PDR/PDR WITH MASSIVE NEW VESSELS
Often cases with florid PDR or massive neovascular complexes are unsuccessfully treated with a regular full-scatter panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), necessitating repeated treatment. AntiVEGF therapy, in the form of bevacizumab, as demonstrated by Avery et al, can regress new vessels.9 In a subgroup analysis of cases of diabetic macular edema treated with pegaptanib sodium (Macugen), regression of coexistent neovascularisation was noted too.10 Regression of these new vessels has been noted to occur within days. These agents can thus be used as primary therapy or in combination with PRP to treat neovascular complexes, especially large and widespread ones. It is prudent to follow-up anti-VEGF injections, with a regular PRP for long-term stability, the advantage accrued being in the rapid control over the neovascularisation as well as the reduced area and episodes of retinal photocoagulation (Figures 4-1A and B).
FIGURES 4-1A AND B: (A) A large neovascular frond with vitreous hemorrhage prior to intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. (B) Conversion of the neovascular tissue to fibrous tissue with resolution of the vitreous hemorrhage following an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.
POST-PRP REFRACTORY PDR
As a corollary to the clinical scenario portrayed above, PRP may fail to regress new vessels or they may continue to recur despite maximal laser photocoagulation. As Avery et al, Jorge and workers have shown, bevacizumab may be employed to regress recurrent neovascularisation in cases refractory to PRP9, 11 (Figures 4.2A and B).
VITREOUS HEMORRHAGE (MOBILE) |
|
Fresh, mobile, dispersed vitreous hemorrhage may be contained with intravitreal bevacizumab.12 It |
|
is believed that the recurrent bleeds that contribute to the chronicity of such hemorrhages may be |
|
mitigated by the regressive effect of the anti-VEGF agents on the neovascular sprouts. Preventing |
|
continued hemorrhage can allow the eye to recuperate from a single hemorrhagic episode. Careful |
|
upright positioning, close follow-up with opportunistic application of laser photocoagulation to retina |
|
uncovered by a receding vitreous hemorrhage may help in the early rehabilitation of these patients. |
|
Anti-VEGF therapy, it needs to be emphasized, is unlikely to be of much use in cases of organized or |
41 |
chronic vitreous hemorrhages, for which vitrectomy is the only practical option. |
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
FIGURES 4-2A AND B: (A) A persistent large neovascular vessels with preretinal hemorrhage despite adequate panretinal photocoagulation. (B) Significant regression of the new vessels post-injection bevacizumab
|
FIGURES 4-3A AND B: (A) A case with new vessels overlying a diabetic tractional detachment. (B) Regression of the |
|
|
neovascularization with minimal conversion to fibrous tissue one week after intravitreal bevacizumab injection |
|
|
administered as a preoperative adjuvant |
|
|
AS A PREOPERATIVE ADJUVANT PRIOR TO VITRECTOMY FOR DIABETIC MACULAR |
|
|
TRACTIONAL RETINAL DETACHMENT (TRD) WITH NEOVASCULARIZATION |
|
|
Vitrectomy for diabetic TRD’s is often complicated by the presence of active neovascular fronds |
|
|
astride the detachments that lead to hemorrhages and make membrane peeling a hazardous task. A |
|
|
preoperative injection of an anti-VEGF agent such as bevacizumab, can regress the neovascular |
|
|
tissue facilitating vitrectomy and membrane peeling significantly (Figures 4-3A and B).13 However, |
|
|
one needs to ensure that the time span between the injection and vitrectomy is kept short, preferrably |
|
|
3–7 days. Delaying the vitrectomy beyond 2 weeks entails the risk of excessive fibrosis (Figures |
|
|
4-4A and B). The epiretinal membranes may become tougher and more adherent to the retina, while |
|
|
the detachments themselves may increase in size. |
|
|
PDR WITH NEOVASCULARIZATION OF IRIS (NVI) / NEOVASCULAR GLAUCOMA (NVG) |
|
|
Rubeosis in cases of PDR may also be tackled with injections of anti-VEGF such as bevacizumab |
|
42 |
||
either by intravitreal or intracameral administration14,15 (Figures 4-5A and B). More often than not, |
||
|
Anti-VEGF Therapy in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
FIGURES 4-4A AND B: (A) A diabetic macular tractional detachment with marked neovascularization. (B) Excessive fibrosis with complete regression of the neovascular tissue noted 1 month after intravitreal bevacizumab injection
FIGURES 4-5A AND B: (A) Neovascularization of the iris in a case of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
(B) Significant regression of the iris new vessels following an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab
however, if the ischemia is enormous, these injections have only a transient effect-regressing the rubeosis rapidly albeit for a short while. They thus need to be supplemented with the long-term effect of PRP. They are useful, as a preoperative adjunct to surgery, in cases with new iris vessels, such as prior to vitrectomy (as stated in the previous section), silicon oil removal, trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma and cataract surgery. Pegaptanib has also been shown to transient regression of rubeosis.16
PDR WITH CSME
Anti-VEGF therapy has the advantage of being efficacious against neovascularisation as well as macular edema.2,4 All the three anti-VEGF agents (Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, Pegaptanib Sodium) have been shown to have a beneficial effect on diabetic macular edema.17,18,19 There can be a concomitant
regressive effect on the neovascularization too, in cases of PDR with DME.10 While these reports 43 profess multiple injections to treat DME, a single injection may be followed up with a reduced
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
macular grid photocoagulation. This method appears to avoid the negatives of multiple injections as well as extensive macular photocoagulation for DME.
Conclusion
The promise of these anti-VEGF injections needs to be balanced against the problems of repeated injections such as endophthalmitis, cataracts, retinal detachments, vitreous hemorrhage.2 Although intravenous bevacizumab chemotherapy was associated with systemic problems like hypertension, thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal perforation and death, the vastly reduced intraocular dose sequestered into the vitreous cavity helps mitigate this risk.2 However, trace plasma levels of these anti-VEGF drugs have been noted post-intravitreal injections suggesting that systemic absorption and its attendant perils, need to be watched for, especially in high-risk patients.4 Hence one needs to temper enthusiasm towards such invasive therapy in favour of a more conservative practice pattern.
References
1.Adamis AP, Shima DT. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular health and disease. Retina 2005;25: 111-8.
2.Andreoli CM, Miller JW. Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth factor for ocular neovascular disease. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol 2007; 18: 502-8.
3.Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disoders. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(22): 1480-7.
4.vanWijngaardenP,CosterDJ,WilliamsKA.Inhibitorsofocularneovascularization:promisesandpotentialproblems. JAMA 2005; 293: 1509-13.
5.Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress. Endocr Rev 2004; 25: 581-611.
6.Klein RM, Klein RB, Avastin versus Lucentis; ethical issues in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2007; 27: 1163-5.
7.Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl Med 2006;355:1419-31.
8.Gragoudas ES, Adamis AP, Cunningham ET, Feinsod M, Guyer DR, et al. Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2805–16.
9.Avery RL, Pearlman J, Pieramici DJ, Rabena MD, Castellarin AA, Nasir MA, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1695.e1-15.
10.Adamis AP, Altaweel M, Bressler NM, Cunningham ET, Goldbaum M, Gonzales M, et al. Changes in retinal neovascularization after pegaptanib (Macugen) therapy in diabetic individuals. Ophthalmol 2006; 113: 23-8.
11.Jorge R, Costa RA, Calucci D, Cintra LP, Scott IU. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for persistent new vessels in diabetic retinopathy (IBEPE Study). Retina 2006; 26: 1006-13.
12.SpaideRF,FisherYL.Intravitrealbevacizumab(Avastin)treatmentofproliferativediabeticretinopathycomplicated by vitreous hemorrhage. Retina 2006 Mar; 26(3): 275-8.
13.ChenE,ParkCW.Useofintravitrealbevacizumabasapreoperativeadjunctfortractionalretinaldetachmentinsevere proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2006; 26:699-700.
14.OshimaY,SakaguchiH,GomiF,TanoY.Regressionofirisneovascularizationafterintravitrealinjectionofbevacizumab in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142:155-8.
15.GrisantiS,BiesterS,PetersS,TatarO,ZiemssenF,Bartz-SchmidtKUetal.Intracameralbevacizumabforirisrubeosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142:158-60.
16.Krzystolik MG, Filippopoulos T, Ducharme JF, Loewenstein JI. Pegaptanib as adjunctive treatment for complicated neovascular diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124(6): 920-1.
17.ChunDW,HeierJS,ToppingTM,DukerJS,BankertJM.Apilotstudyofmultipleintravitrealinjectionsofranibizumab in patients with centre-involving clinically significant diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol 2006; 113: 1706-1.
18.Macugen Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. A phase II randomized double-masked study of pegaptanib, an anti-
vascular endothelial growth factor aptamer, for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1747-57. 44 19. Haritoglou C, Kook D, Neubauer A, Wolf A, Prigler S, Strauss R, et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for
persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Retina 2006; 26: 999-1005.
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
Introduction
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is associated with gradual progressive visual decline as a consequence of dysfunction of the central retina, retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in older adults.1 The disease has been traditionally classified as early and late stages.1
The early stages consist of alterations in the color of the macular pigment epithelium, hypo or hyperpigmentation, and the presence of drusen, greater than 125 microns in diameter. They have modest visual symptoms including micro-scotomata, reduced contrast sensitivity, metamorphopsia and nyctalopia.
The exudative phase is typically late in onset, occurring in eyes with high-risk characteristics including the presence of extensive soft drusen, Bruch’s membrane thickening and focal hyperpigmentation. There is rapid loss of vision over 6-12 months and formation of a central disciform scar. Without intervention, the visual acuity generally decreases to the range 20/200 or worse, 12 months following the onset of this phase.2, 3
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a principal role in the neovascular forms of agerelated degeneration. It causes endothelial proliferation, migration and new capillary formation inducing angiogenesis. It also enhances vascular permeability.
There are 6 different isoforms of VEGF having 121,145,165,183,189 and 206 amino acids.4, 5 VEGF 165 is thought to be predominantly responsible for pathological neovascularization and exists in both soluble and bound forms.4
Its function at the retinal pigment epithelial level is poorly understood. It probably plays a role as a vascular survival factor for the choriocapillaries as well as maintainence of fenestrations in the choriocapillaries through directed secretion from the basal portion of the pigment epithelium.
VEGF Receptors
VEGF has two receptor tyrosine kinases: VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 through which it exerts its action.4 VEGFR-1 is upregulated by a hypoxia–inducing factor dependent mechanism (HIF). The receptor undergoes weak tyrosine autophosphorylation in response to VEGF. It is thought to be a decoy receptor rather than a mitogenic stimulus. It causes down-regulation of the activity of VEGF by sequestering and rendering the factor less available to VEGFR-2.
VEGFR-2 binds VEGF with lower affinity relative to VEGFR-2 and is felt to be a major mediator of mitogenic, angiogenic and permeability enhancing effects of VEGF.
In addition, there appear to be several other receptors on tumors and endothelial cells that bind VEGF principally neuropilin (NRP1 and NRP2). They may induce neuronal guidance and are thought to be specific for VEGF 165.
The permeability changes resulting from VEGFR-2 are mediated by endothelial nitric oxide synthetase-based generation of increased nitric oxide levels and associated calcium flux.
These effects are reversed by the indirect inhibition of VEGF effects through modulation of ICAM, or indirect effects on nitric oxide phosphorylase, nitric oxide synthetase, or protein kinase C,
46 another modulator of permeability.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Inhibitors in Age-related Macular Degeneration
There are a class of compounds called Aptamers, which are chemically synthesized single strand nucleic acids either DNA or RNA, that bind to target molecules with high selectivity and affinity leaving non-targeted protein functions intact. Other methods include inhibition of tyrokinase receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 either by systemic administration or gene transfer.
We will now be discussing the various antivascular endothelial growth factors in current use.
Pegaptanib Sodium (MacugenTM )
Pegaptanib (Macugen) is a selective antiVEGF165 pegylated (two 20-kD polyethylene glycol molecules attached in each end) and fluorinated sugar backbone 28-mer RNA aptamer. It inhibits pathologic angiogenesis with associated leakage and spares physiologic vasculature.5,6
Aptamers are synthesized by SELEX (systematic evolution of ligands of exponential enrichment). SELEX is a combinatorial chemistry methodology. This method uses in vitro selection to evolve the best inhibitor to a target.5 It is given by intravitreal injections and its plasma concentration reflects its vitreous concentration by a factor of 1 per 1000 to 1 per 350. Its vitreous half-life is about 4 days and with the doses tested therapeutic level concentrations are attained for about 6 weeks after a single injection.
Clinical Trials
Phase III studies were performed through two simultaneously conducted, identically designed, large, multicentric, prospective, randomized, double-masked, dose-ranging trials in patients with broad spectrum of vision and sub-foveal types of choroidal neovascular membrane (CNV) subtypes of AMD called VEGF inhibition.
VISION Trial (Studies in Ocular Neovascularization)7
The first trial consisted of 586 patients at 58 sites across North America. The second trial included |
|
622 patients at sites located around the world. The 1208 patients from both studies were randomized |
|
1:1:1:1 to receive 0.3 mg of pegaptanib, 1.0 mg of pegaptanib, 3.0 mg of pegaptanib, or sham injection. |
|
Patients received an injection of pegaptanib or sham injection every 6 weeks for 48 weeks. Four |
|
patients were not included in the final analysis because of insufficient baseline assessments. The |
|
primary efficacy endpoint was measured by the percentage of patients losing less than 15 letters at |
|
week 54. Efficacy was demonstrated in all of the pegaptanib groups ( P < 0.001 for 0.3 mg and 1.0 mg |
|
of pegaptanib, and P = 0.03 for 3.0 mg of pegaptanib compared with sham injections). Seventy |
|
percent of the patients in the lowest efficacious dose (0.3 mg) group lost less than 15 letters at week |
|
54 versus 55% in the sham group. The risk for severe visual loss of greater than 30 letters dropped |
|
from 22% to 10% in patients receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib compared with sham. Thirty-three |
|
percent of patients maintained or gained visual acuity from baseline over the course of the study, |
|
compared with only 22% with sham injection (P = 0.03). |
|
In another study Quiram PA et al found that Pegaptanib as primary therapy for naïve CNV |
|
lesions offers a 90% rate of improvement or stabilization of vision-outcomes that exceed those reported |
47 |
in the VISION trial.8 |
