Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery_Natarajan, Hussain_2008
.pdf
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
dry AMD (Cameron et al, 2007) eyes and in promoter-based assays, this finding was not replicated in another study (Kanda et al, 2007). Thus, the precise role of the LOC387715 and HTRA1 SNPs in AMD is as yet unknown, and their interactions with different factors in the complement pathway remain speculative. However, such speculations cannot be addressed unless extensive data on gene– gene interactions in the background of other nongenetic factors leading to the pathophysiology of AMD are elucidated (Swaroop et al, 2007)
APOE
In the past few years, association of variants in genes involved in lipid metabolism such as Apolipoprotein E (APOE) have increased our understanding of the underlying mechanism of AMD development. Based on common pathogenic features including lipid deposition (drusen and plaque formation), thickening of connective tissue (Bruch’s membrane and arterial inner lining) and elevated levels of CRP in serum, a common mechanism for the development of AMD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases was proposed (Freidman 2000). However, it was noted that the effect of APOE alleles on AMD risk was contrastingly different than that of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (Baird et al, 2004; Zareparsi et al, 2004). Association of APOE in AMD has been reported by several groups (Klaver et al, 1998; Schmidt et al, 2002; Baird et al, 2004; Zareparsi et al, 2004) showing a reduced risk of AMD with APOE-e2 allele and higher risk with allele APOE-e4. However, APOE polymorphisms have exhibited varied geographical and ethnic variations across AMD patients worldwide (Kaur et al, 2006).
Toll like Receptor 4 (TLR4)
A recent study by Zareparsi et al, (2005) implicated the TLR4 gene (9q32-33) in AMD pathogenesis. Toll like receptors are involved in innate immunity and pathogen recognition (Cook et al, 2004), linked to regulation of cholesterol efflux and participates in phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments by the RPE (Kiechl et al, 2002; Castrillo et al, 2003; Kindzelskii et al, 2004; Blander et al, 2004). The D299G polymorphism in TLR4 was associated with a 2.65 folds increased risk of AMD, thereby suggesting that altered TLR4 signaling by this variant may influence phagocytic function of RPE which in turn may contribute to RPE damage. It was also shown that TLR4-D299G had an additive effect on AMD risk (OR = 4.13, p = 0.002) with allelic variants of APOE and ATP binding cassette transporter-1 (ABCA1), which are involved in cholesterol efflux. However, the effect of TLR4, APOE and ABCA1 variants on AMD susceptibility was in contrast to that seen in atherosclerosis. But TLR4 polymorphisms have not been explored extensively across different world AMD populations compared to other candidate genes.
Mechanisms of AMD Development
Several pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed to understand the complex etiologies of AMD development including RPE cell death, oxidative damage of cellular components, mitochondrial dysfunction and accumulation of toxic components such as lipofuscin and advanced end glycation products (Haddad et al, 2006). It was thus proposed that variations in genes involved in inflammation, oxidative stress and cholesterol metabolism play significant role in the pathogenesis
8 of AMD.
Genetics of Age-related Macular Degeneration
ROLE OF COMPLEMENT ACTIVATION AND INFLAMMATION IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF AMD
Inflammation has been implicated in several diseases of aging like Alzheimer’s disease, stroke and cardiovascular disease. Interestingly all these diseases share lots of similarities with AMD with respect to pathological features and common biomarkers for the disease such as increased levels of CRP, CFH and Homocysteine in plasma of patients, presence of serum amyloid P component in drusens (the levels of which are elevated in plasma of Alzheimer patients) and association with CFH (Y402H) and APO E variation, etc.
Protein profiling studies of the drusen also revealed the presence of immunoglobulins, components of the complement pathway (C3, C5b-9 complex) (Johnson et al, 2000), molecules involved in acute phase response to inflammation (e.g. Amyloid P component and 1-antitrypsin), proteins that modulate immune response (vitronectin, clusterin, apolipoprotein E, membrane cofactor protein, complement receptor 1), major histocompatibility complex class II antigens and HLA-DR and cluster differentiation antigens (Mullins et al, 2000). Accumulation of all these proteins and cellular debris suggest that cells are subjected to a chronic sublethal complement attack mediated by choroidal dendritic cells and macrophages resulting in the further degradation of Bruch’s membrane (Johnson et al, 2001, Hageman et al, 2001). These studies gave a strong evidence for the role of inflammation and dysfunction of complement pathways in the pathogenesis of AMD.
ACCUMULATION OF LIPOFUSCIN IN THE RPE
Lipofuscin are autoflourescent lysosomal storage bodies that accumulate in the postmitotic metabolically active cells throughout the body due to normal aging process. These bodies originate primarily from the degradation of different intracellular organelle and the incomplete degradation of extracellular material taken into the cells by phagocytosis. RPE lipofuscin are formed due to ingestion of photoreceptor outer segments as evident from the presence of retinoids, high concentration of DHL-Lipids, etc. Accumulation of lipofuscin in RPE has been associated with the development of AMD though evidence for the same has not been provided.
ROLE OF OXIDATIVE STRESS MEDIATORS AND MODIFICATIONS IN AMD PATHOGENESIS
The evidence for oxidative stress playing a major role in AMD pathogenesis includes increased risk of AMD in smokers, presence of oxidative modified proteins in the drusen/Bruch’s membrane/ RPE / choriodal tissues and slower progression of AMD in patients fed on regular supplementation of antioxidant vitamins and Zinc. Several studies have pointed out that oxidative protein modifications serve as a primary catalyst for macular degeneration, the reactive oxygen species/oxidative products being provided by photo-oxidative rich milieu in the retina particularly the lipids and retinoid rich photoreceptor segments. Proteome study of drusens also demonstrated the elevated levels of oxidatively modified proteins like μ-carboxyethyl pyrrole (CEP) adducts in the drusen, Bruch’s membrane and plasma of AMD patients. It was found that the mean level of CEP adducts was 1.5 fold higher (p = 0.004) and that of antibody titers in plasma was 2.3-fold higher (p = 0.02) in patients with AMD compared with normal age-matched controls (Gu et al, 2003). Of individuals (n = 13) exhibiting both antigen and autoantibody levels above the mean for non-AMD controls, 92% had AMD. Based on the results, CEP immunoreactivity and autoantibody titer may have diagnostic utility in predicting AMD susceptibility.
These CEP adducts are generated from oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) particularly docasohexanoic acid (DHA) present in photoreceptor outer segments and have been 9
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
shown to induce choroidal neovascualrization (CNV) in retinal tissues. In-vitro treatment of human RPE cells with CEP dipeptide or CEP-HSA did not induce increased VEGF secretion and suggesting that anti-CEP therapeutic modalities might be of value in limiting CNV in AMD (Ebrahem et al, 2006). CNV in retinal tissues can also be stimulated by the complement components (C3a and C5a) present in the drusen. It was shown that genetic ablation of receptors for C3a or C5a reduces VEGF expression, leukocyte recruitment and CNV formation after laser injury. These experiments suggested that antibody-mediated neutralization of C3a or C5a or pharmacological blockade of their receptor could be therapeutic modalities for AMD (Nozaki et al, 2005).
Conclusions
Genetic association studies have led to the implication of several candidate genes in AMD in the last few years. These association studies have been meaningful as they have been widely replicated across multiple populations with varied ethnic backgrounds in clinically well characterized cohorts (Todd 2006). Moreover, the effect sizes of these variants, particularly the CFH (Y402H), LOC387715 (A69S) and HTRA1 have been substantially large that permitted a proper association amidst varied sample sizes in different studies. In future, more such studies are required across wider geographical regions to identify candidates that contribute to the AMD pathogenesis. Genetic typing of AMD patients would also permit clinicians to develop correlations with genotypes for estimating disease risk and progression. Identification of susceptible gene variant(s) would allow early intervention in subjects ‘at-risk’ of developing AMD for a better prognosis. While the underlying biological functions of these candidate genes and their interactions are yet to be characterized, large multicentre studies with these variants should be undertaken with respect to the treatment modalities in order to understand the therapeutic mechanisms in subjects carrying the risk genotype(s).
Bibliography
1.Age-related Eye Disease Study research Group. Risk factors associated with age-related macular degeneration. A case-control study in the Age-related Eye Disease Study; Age-related Eye Disease Study Report Number 3. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 2224-32.
2.Age-related Eye Disease Study research Group. Risk factors for the incidence of advanced Age-Related macular degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) AREDS Report No. 19. Ophthalmology 2005;11: 532-9.
3.Akimoto A, Akimoto M, Kuroiwa S, Kikuchi T, Yoshimura N. Lack of association of mutations of the bestrophin gene with age-related macular degeneration in non-familial Japanese patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239: 66–8.
4.Allikmets R, Seddon JM, Bernstein PS, Hutchinson A, Atkinson A, et al. Evaluation of the Best disease gene in patients with age-related macular degeneration and other maculopathies. Hum Genet 1999;104:449–53.
5.Allikmets R, Shroyer NF, Singh N, Seddon JM, Lewis RA, et al. Mutation of the Stargardt disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration. Science 1997;277:1805–7.
6.Ayyagari R, Zhang K, Hutchinson A, Yu Z, Swaroop A, et al. Evaluation of the ELOVL4 gene in patients with agerelated macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Genet 2001;22: 233–9.
7.Baird PN, Guida E, Chu DT, Vu HT, Guymer RH. The epsilon 2 and epsilon 4 alleles of the apolipoprotein gene are associated with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1311-5.
8.Baird PN, Islam FM, Richardson AJ, Cain M, Hunt N, et al. Analysis of the Y402H variant of the complement factor- H gene in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 4194-8.
10 |
9. Balasubramanian D. Molecular and cellular approaches to understand and treat some diseases of the eye. Curr Sci |
|
2002;82: 948-57. |
||
|
Genetics of Age-related Macular Degeneration
10.Blander JM and Medzhitov R. Regulation of phagosome maturation by signals from toll-like receptors. Science 2004;304, 1014-18.
11.Bressler NM. Early detection and treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15:142-52.
12.Burchard EG, Ziv E, Coyle N, Gomez SL, Tang H, et al. The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2003;348: 1170-5.
13.Cameron DJ, Yang Z, Gibbs D, Chen H, Kaminoh Y, et al. HTRA1 variant confers similar risks to geographic atrophy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cell Cycle 2007;6:1122-5.
14.Castrillo A, Joseph SB, Vaidya SA, Haberland M, Fogelman AM, et al. Crosstalk between LXR and toll-like receptor signaling mediates bacterial and viral antagonism of cholesterol metabolism. Mol Cell 2003;12: 805-16.
15.Clark SJ, Higman VA, Mulloy B, Perkins SJ, Lea SM, et al. His-384 allotypic variant of factor H associated with agerelated macular degeneration has different heparin binding properties from the non-disease-associated form. J Biol Chem 2006;281:24713-20.
16.Conley YP, Jakobsdottir J, Mah T, Weeks DE, Klein R, et al. CFH, ELOVL4, PLEKHA1 and LOC387715 genes and susceptibility to age-related maculopathy: AREDS and CHS cohorts and meta-analyses. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15: 3206-18.
17.Cook DN, Pisetsky DS, Schwartz DA. Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of human disease. Nat Immunol 2004;5: 975-9.
18.Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K, et al. Blindness in the Indian State of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42: 908-16.
19.De La Paz MA, Pericak-Vance MA, Lennon F, Haines JL, Seddon JM. Exclusion of TIMP3 as a candidate locus in agerelated macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38: 1060–5.
20.DeWan A, Liu M, Hartman S, Zhang S, Liu DTL, et al. HTRA1 promoter polymorphism in wet age-related macular degeneration. Science 2006;314: 989-92.
21.Ebrahem Q, Renganathan K, Sears J, Vasanji A, Gu X, et al. Carboxyethylpyrrole oxidative protein modifications stimulate neovascularization: Implications for age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:13480-4.
22.Edwards AO, Ritter R III, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism and agerelated macular degeneration. Science 2005;308: 421-4.
23.Fisher SA, Rivera A, Fritsche LG, Babadjanova G, Petrov S, et al. Assessment of the contribution of CFH and chromosome 10q26 AMD susceptibility loci in a Russian population isolate. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;91: 576-8.
24.Friedman E. The role of the atherosclerotic process in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130: 658-63.
25.Gold B, Merriam JE, Zernanat J, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, et al. Variation in factor B (BF) and complement component 2 (C2) genes is associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat Genet 2006;38: 458-62.
26.Gotoh N, Yamada R, Hiratani H, Renault V, Kuroiwa S, et al. No association between complement factor H gene polymorphism and exudative age-related macular degeneration in Japanese. Hum Genet 2006;120:139-43.
27.Gu X, Meer SG, Miyagi M, Rayborn ME, Hollyfield JG, et al. Carboxyethylpyrrole protein adducts and autoantibodies, biomarkers for age-related macular degeneration. J Biol Chem 2003;278: 42027-35.
28.Haddad S, Chen AC, Santangelo SL, Seddon JM. The Genetics of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review of Progress to Date. Surv Ophthalmol 2006;51:316-3.
29.Hageman GS, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hancox LS, Taiber AJ, et al. A common haplotype in the complement regulatory gene factor H (HF1/CFH) predisposes individuals to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 2005;102:7227-32.
30.Haines JL, Hauser MA, Schmidt S, Scott WK, Olson LM, et al. Complement factor H variant increases the risk of age-related macular degeneration. Science 2005;308: 419-21.
31.Haines JL, Schnetz-Boutaud N, Schmidt S, Scott WK, Agarwal A, et al. Functional candidate genes in age-related macular degeneration: Significant association with VEGF, VLDLR and LRP6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 329-35.
32.Jakobsdottir J, Conley YP, Weeks DE, Mah TS, Ferrell RE, et al. Susceptibility genes for age-related maculopathy on chromosome 10q26. Am J Hum Genet 2005;77: 389-407.
33.Johnson PT, Betts KE, Radeke MJ, Hageman GS, Anderson GH, et al. Individuals homozygous for the age-related macular degeneration risk-conferring variant of complement factor H have elevated levels of CRP in the choroids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103: 17456-61.
34.Kaur K, Hussain A, Hussain N, Das T, Pathangay A, et al. Analysis of CFH, TLR4 and APOE polymorphism in India
suggests the Tyr402His variant of CFH to be a global marker for age-related macular degeneration. Invest |
11 |
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 3729-35. |
|
|
|
|
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery |
|
35. |
Kiechl S, Lorenz E, Reindl M, Wiedermann CJ, Oberhollenzer F, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 polymorphisms and |
|
|
|
|
atherogenesis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:185-92. |
|
36. |
Kindzelskii AL, Elner VM, Elner SG, Yang D, Hughes BA, et al. Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4) of Retinal Pigment |
|
|
|
|
Epithelial Cells Participates in Transmembrane Signaling in Response to Photoreceptor Outer Segments. J Gen |
|
|
|
Physiol 2004;124: 139-49. |
|
37. |
Klaver CC, Kliffen M, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, Cruts M, et al. Genetic association of apolipoprotein E with age- |
|
|
|
|
related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet 1998;63: 200-206. Erratum in Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:1252. |
|
38. |
Klaver CCW, Wolf RCW, Assink JJM, van DuJin CM, Hofman A, et al. Genetic risk of age-related maculopathy. |
|
|
|
|
Population-Based Familial Aggregation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116: 646-51. |
|
39. |
Klein ML, Schultz DW, Edwards A, Matise TC, Rust K, et al. Age-related macular degeneration: clinical features in |
|
|
|
|
a large family and linkage to chromosome 1q. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116: 1082-88. |
|
40. |
Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. |
|
|
|
|
Ophthalmology1992;99: 933-43. |
|
41. |
Klein R, Klein BE, Franke T. The relationship of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors to age-related maculopathy: |
|
|
|
|
The Beaver Dam Eye study. Ophthalmology 1993;100: 406-14. |
|
|
42. Klein R, Peto T, Bird A, Vannewkirk MR. The epidemiology of age related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol |
|
|
|
|
2004;1376: 486-95. |
|
43. |
Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular |
|
|
|
|
degeneration. Science 2005;308: 385-9. |
|
44. |
Krishnaiah S, Das TP, Nirmalan PK, Nutheti R, Shamanna BR, et al. Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: |
|
|
|
|
Findings from Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study in south India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;6: 4442-9. |
|
45. |
Lokki ML, Koskimies SA. Allelic differences in hemolytic activity and protein concentration of BF molecules are |
|
|
|
|
found in association with particular HLA haplotypes. Immunogenetics 1991;34: 242-6. |
|
46. |
Magnusson KP, Duan S, Sigurdsson H, Petursson H, Yang Z, et al. CFH Y402H confers similar risk of soft drusen |
|
|
|
|
and both forms of advanced AMD. PLoS Medicine 2006;3:1-5. |
|
47. |
Majewski J, Schultz DW, Weleber RG, Schain MB, Edwards AO, et al. Age-related macular degeneration-a genome |
|
|
|
|
scan in extended families. Am J Hum Genet 2003;73:540-50. |
|
48. |
Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Wang JJ. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy in Australia. The Blue Mountains |
|
|
|
|
Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1450-60. |
|
49. |
Nirmalam PK, Katz J, Robin AL, Tielsch JM, Namperumalsamy P, et al. Prevalence of vitreoretinal disorders in a |
|
|
|
|
rural population of Southern India: The Aravind Comprehensive Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122: 581-6. |
|
50. |
Nozaki M, Raisler BJ, Sakurai E, Sarma JV, Barnum SR, et al. Drusen complement components C3a and C5a |
|
|
|
|
promote choroidal neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 2006;103: 2328-33. |
|
51. |
Okamoto H, Umeda S, Obazawa M, Minami M, Noda T, et al. Complement factor H polymorphisms in Japanese |
|
|
|
|
population with age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis 2006;12:156-8. |
|
52. |
Rivera A, Fisher SA, Fritsche LG, Keilhauer CN, Lichtner P, et al. Hypothetical LOC387715 is a second major |
|
|
|
|
susceptibility gene for age related macular degeneration contributing independently from complement factor H to |
|
|
|
disease risk. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14: 3227-36. |
|
|
53. Ross RJ, Bojanowski CM, Wang JJ, Chew EW, Rochtchina E, et al. The LOC387715 and age related macular |
|
|
|
|
degeneration: Replication in three case-control samples. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:1128-32. |
|
54. |
Schmidt S, Klaver C, Saunders A, Postel E, De La Paz M, et al. A pooled case-control study of the apolipoprotein E |
|
|
|
|
(APOE) gene in age-related maculopathy. Ophthalmic Genet 2002;23:209-23. |
|
55. |
Schmidt S, Saunders AM, De La Paz MA, Postel EA, Heinis RM, et al. Association of the Apolipoprotein E gene with |
|
|
|
|
the age-related macular degeneration: Possible effect modification by family history, age, and gender. Mol Vis |
|
|
|
2000;6: 287-93. |
|
56. |
Schmidt S, Scott WK, Postel EA, Agarwal A, Hauser ER, et al. Ordered subset linkage analysis supports a susceptibility |
|
|
|
|
locus for age-related macular degeneration on chromosome 16p12. BMC Genet 2004;5:18. |
|
57. |
Schmidt S, Hauser MA, Scott WK, Postel EA, Aggarwal A, et al. Cigarette smoking strongly modifies the association |
|
|
|
|
of LOC387715 and age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet 2006;78: 852-64. |
|
58. |
Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Mitchell BD. Familial aggregation of age-related maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;123: |
|
|
|
|
199-206. |
|
59. |
Seddon JM, Ajani UA, Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Blair N, et al. Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced |
|
|
|
|
age-related macular degeneration. Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. JAMA 1994;272: 1413-20. Erratum in: |
|
|
|
JAMA 1995; 273: 622. |
|
60. |
Seddon JM, Cote J, Page WF, Aggen SH, Neale MC. The US twin study of age related macular degeneration: |
|
|
|
|
Relative roles of genetic and environmental influences. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123: 321-7. |
12 |
|
|
|
61. |
Seddon JM, Santangelo SL, Book K, Chong S, Cote J. A genome-wide scan for age-related macular degeneration |
||
|
|
provides evidence for linkage to several chromosomal regions. Am J Hum Genet 2003;73: 780-90. |
|
|
|
|
|
Genetics of Age-related Macular Degeneration
62.Seddon JA, Francis PJ, George S, Schultz DW, Rosner B, et al. Association of CFH Y402H and LOC387715 A69S with progression of age-related macular degeneration. JAMA 2007; 297:1793-1800.
63.Seitsonen S, Lemmela S, Holopainen J, Tommila P, Ranta P, et al. Analysis of variants in the complement factor H, the elongation of very long chain fatty acids-like 4 and the hemicentin 1 genes of age-related macular degeneration in the Finnish population. Mol Vis 2006;12: 796-801.
64.Sepp T, Khan JC, Thurlby DA, Shahid H, Clayton DG, et al. Complement Factor H variant Y402H is a major risk determinant for geographic atrophy and choroidal neovascularization in smokers and nonsmokers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 536-40.
65.Shastry BS, Trese MT. Evaluation of the peripherin/RDS gene as a candidate gene in families with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 1999;213:165–70.
66.Simonelli F, Frisso G, Testa F, di Fiore R, Vitale DF, et al. Polymorphsim p.402Y>H in the complement factor H protein is a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration in an Italian population. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1142- 5.
67.Souied EH, Leveziel N, Richard F, Dragon-Durey MA, Coscas G, et al. Y402H Complement factor H polymorphism associated with exudative age-related macular degeneration in the French population. Mol Vis 2005;11:1135-40.
68.Stone EM, Lotery AJ, Munier FL, Heon E, Piguet B, et al. A single EFEMP1 mutation associated with both Malattia Leventinese and Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy. Nat Genet 1999;22:199-202.
69.Tanimoto S, Tamura H, Ue T, Yamane K, Maruyama H, et al. A polymorphism of LOC387715 gene is associated with age-related macular degeneration in the Japanese population. Neurosci Lett 2006;414: 71-4.
70.The Eye Disease Case – Control Study Group. Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1701-8.
71.Todd JA. Statistical false positive or true disease pathway? Nat Genet 2006;38: 731-3.
72.Tomany SC, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson MD. Sunlight and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122: 750-7. Erratum in: Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123: 362.
73.Tomany SC, Wang JJ, Van Leeuwen R, Klein R, Mitchell P, et al. Risk factors for incident age-related macular degeneration: Pooled findings from three continents. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1280-7.
74.Weeks DE, Conley YP, Mah TS, Paul TO, Morse L, et al. A full genome scan for age-related maculopathy. Hum Mol Genet 2000;9:1329-49.
75.Weeks DE, Conley YP, Tsai HJ, Mah TS, Schmidt S, et al. Age-related maculopathy: a genome-wide scan with continued evidence of susceptibility loci within the 1q31, 10q26, and 17q25 regions. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75: 174-89.
76.World Health Organization. Fact sheet no. 282. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment. http://www.who.int/ mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/, 2004.
77.Yang Z, Camp NJ, Sun H, Tong Z, Gibbs D, et al. A variant of the HTRA1 gene increases susceptibility to agerelated macular degeneration. Science 2006;314: 992-3.
78.Yoshida T, DeWan A, Zhang H, Sakamoto R, Okamoto H, et al. HTRA1 promoter polymorphism predisposes Japanese to age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis 2007;13: 545-8.
79.Zareparsi S, Branham KE, Li M, Shah S, Klein RJ, et al. Strong association of the Y402H variant in complement factor H at 1q32 with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Am J Hum Genet 2005;77:149-53.
80.Zareparsi S, Buraczynska M, Branham KE, Shah S, Eng D, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 variant D299G is associated with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:1449-55.
81.Zareparsi S, Reddick AC, Branham KE, Moore KB, Jessup L, et al. Association of apolipoprotein E alleles with susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration in a large cohort from a single center. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45: 1306-10.
13
Textbook of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
Introduction
Cell therapy is an exciting area of research that is aimed at regeneration of tissues or organs in patients with irreparable damage to these tissues or organs. Cell therapy is no longer restricted to transfer of cells from a healthy subject to a patient, as in bone marrow transplant or corneal transplant. We can now envisage cell therapy that involves generation of patient-specific cells for transplantation, manipulate them in vitro into the desired cell type and transplant these cells into a patient for functional restoration of the damaged tissue. Although many cell therapies are currently being tested in animal models and their clinical application might take much longer, results from these studies are encouraging and suggest that regeneration of custom-made organs might indeed be possible in real life.
Cell therapy in the form of simple blood transfusion and bone marrow transplant has been in use for a long time. This was limited to collecting healthy cells from matched donors and introducing these cells into the patient. The cells were not propagated or manipulated in any way in vitro prior to transplantation. The first culture and transplantation of dermal epithelial cells was performed to replace damaged skin in burns patients1, 2 and taking cues from these experiments, similar approach was used to regenerate corneal epithelium in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency.3 Simultaneously embryonic stem cells were first established in 19814,5 and further understanding of mechanisms underlying self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells into various types of cells led to designing of new therapeutic strategies.
Degenerative diseases of retina like retinitis pigmentosa (RP), age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic retinopathy lead to irreparable damage to the retina and are a major cause of blindness in developed countries (Figure 2-1). Several genetic disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa or Leber congenital amaurosis also lead to retinal degeneration and blindness. A therapeutic approach that can regenerate retinal cells or the entire retina would help improve visual acuity and quality of life of these patients. Use of cell therapy for retina however is not easy as the retina consists of several cell types and retinal disorders can occur due to damage to any of these cell types. The neural retina consists of rod and cone photoreceptors, bipolar cells, ganglion cells, horizontal cells, Müller cells and amacrine cells that are arranged in a definite three-dimensional structure. The neural retina rests on the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), which is in close contact with photoreceptors and is vital for maintenance of photoreceptor homeostasis. Degeneration of any type of cells in the neural retina or RPE can lead to retinal degeneration and loss of vision. Retinal disorders could also occur due to uncontrolled growth of endothelial cells leading to neovascularization in the retina that can eventually lead to retinal detachment in diseases like diabetic retinopathy and AMD. The current attempts at retinal cell therapy are therefore aimed at regeneration of cells in neural retina, regeneration of RPE and re-establishment of correct retinal vasculature. For treatment of inherited retinal disorders, the cell therapy also might involve manipulations to correct the genetic defect by gene therapy.
Cell therapy is an interdisciplinary field that requires inputs from the field of stem cell biology, regenerative biology, material science, developmental biology, genetic engineering and clinicians. The success and feasibility of any cell therapy depends on a number of factors, such as availability of suitable source of stem cells, expansion and manipulation of cells to generate the desired type of cell, introduction of cells in vivo, survival and integration of cells to reconstruct degenerated tissue and restoration of its physiological function (Figure 2-2).
An appropriate source of stem cells that can generate and sustain cells/tissue of interest is an 16 important starting point for cell therapy. Stem cells are the cells that have the ability to renew
Cell Therapy in Retinal Diseases
FIGURE 2-1: Fundus photograph showing wet (Top left) and geographic atrophy (Top right) age-related macular degeneration, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (bottom)
themselves and also differentiate into any other cell of the body. They could be embryonic stem cells, which are derived from the inner cell mass of blastula or adult stem cells, which are present in the adult tissues such as bone marrow, liver, muscles, skin and cornea. Embryonic stem cells are totipotent, i.e. they have the ability to differentiate into any other cell type. Adult stem cells on the other hand have limited capacity to divide and can differentiate only into specific types of cells. They can be either multipotent stem cells that can differentiate into many types of cells, such as the bone marrow stem cells, or unipotent stem cells that can differentiate into only one type of cell, e.g. limbal stem cells. For retina, several sources of stem cells such as embryonic, fetal and adult stem cells from eye and bone marrow have been investigated as discussed below. An autologous source of cells would be preferred in order to avoid complications of rejection associated with graft rejection, but it may not be possible to use an autologous source if retinal degeneration is due to an inherited disorder.
The next important issue is the ability to culture these stem cells in vitro to expand them. The number of cells available for transplantation, especially if they are from adult tissues, is often limited and the cells need to be cultured in vitro to obtain sufficient number of cells. Expansion of cells while maintaining their characteristics such as their stemness or their differentiation status is a challenge
and requires standardization of culture conditions. This involves identification of correct culture 17
