Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography (Basics and Case Study Series)_Sinjab_2010
.pdf
Reading Pentacam Topography 41 
Fig. 3.11: The thinnest location is severely displaced giving the thickness map the shape of a cone.
42 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography
2.The relation between the apex of the cornea and the center of the pupil: It is important in the issue of “decentration” or “offset pupil”.
3.The relation between the apex of the cornea and the thinnest location: This relationship could be according to thickness or to coordinates.
•The relationship according to thickness: Let us look at Fig. 2.13 to compare the thickness at the apex with the thickness at the thinnest location. The difference should be no more than 10 µ and not increasing with follow up.
•The relationship according to coordinates (Fig. 3.12): When the value exceeds -500 µ, it is a risk factor, especially when the difference is increasing with follow up at one to two years intervals. When this value exceeds -1000 µ, it is an important sign of an advanced keratoconus (see Fig. 2.13).
4.Look for the thickness on the 4 mm circle: There should be no more than 30 µ difference between the superior and inferior points (we will call this from now as superior-inferior difference).
Fig. 3.12: The relationship between pachy apex and thinnest location coordinates. The ‘y’ coordinate is more important than ‘X’; because the thinnest location is generally displaced vertically in the development of keratoconus or keratoectasia.
Reading Pentacam Topography 43 
Fig. 3.13: The topometric map. Q-value measured and displayed in the four main sectors of the cornea.
5.Compare the thinnest location between the examined cornea and its fellow, the difference should be no more than 30 microns.
Topometric Map
Fig. 3.13 illustrates Q-value in four sectors of the cornea: nasal, temporal, upper and lower sectors. It also shows the average vertical and horizontal values. Fig. 3.14 shows Q-values in the four sectors of the cornea within circles centered on the apex of the cornea with 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm diameters (or in angles of 20°, 25°, 30° and 35° respectively).
The most important values are the vertical in general and the inferior in particular, as in Fig. 3.15. The normal
Fig. 3.14: Q-values according to different concentric rings and in the four main sectors.
44 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography
Fig. 3.15: The important Q-values in the topometric map. The average vertical in general and the inferior in particular.
value is < -0.5 (as an absolute value). It is border line when it falls between -0.5 and -0.55. If the value is > -0.55 (as an absolute value), we should hesitate a lot before proceeding to the standard Lasik treatment. The most important sector is the 6 mm or 20° sector.
Keratoconus Indices Page
•Diagram of the relation between corneal thickness and location (Fig. 3.16).
•Diagram of the relation between thickness increment and location (Fig. 3.17).
It is important for the red curve to be within the normal range and the course of the red curve to be parallel to the normal range. In certain cases the red curve deviates after few millimeters (Fig. 3.18). If the red curve deviates at the 6 mm circle or after, it is normal, otherwise it is a risk factor because the quick downward deviation means that the corneal center is relatively thinned in relation to the periphery, which proved to be risky either with Lasik, or to some extent with PRK, whether the patient is hyperopic or myopic.
Reading Pentacam Topography 45 
Fig. 3.16: Mean corneal thickness values on rings concentrically to the thinnest location. The black dotted lines are the normal range and average in normative data. The red line is for the measured cornea.
46 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography
Fig. 3.17: Progression of corneal thickness. The black dotted lines are the normal range and average in normative data. The red line is for the measured cornea.
Reading Pentacam Topography 47 
Fig. 3.18: The progression of corneal thickness of a keratoconic cornea. The measured red line is out of the normal range, and it deviates before 6 mm indicating a rapidly increasing thickness from the thinnest location towards periphery.
Table 3.1: The normal, suspected and abnormal findings in corneal topography
|
|
Normal |
|
Suspected |
Abnormal |
|
|
|
value(s) |
|
value(s) |
value(s) |
|
Quality specification (QS) |
white |
|
yellow |
red |
||
K-readings: |
look |
at flat K for myopic |
>48 |
|||
|
|
treatment, look at steep K |
|
|||
|
|
for hyperopic treatment |
|
|||
Corneal astigmatism |
compare with manifest |
> 6 |
||||
|
|
astigmatism |
|
|
||
Average Q-value |
0 to -1 |
|
|
0,-1 |
||
Topometric map (vertical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and inferior Q-values) |
|
|
|
-0.5 to -0.55 |
>-0.55 |
|
Thinnest location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thickness |
> 500 |
|
470 – 500 |
< 470 |
||
Difference in thickness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
between patchy apex and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thinnest location |
< 5 µ |
|
5 – 10 µ |
>10 µ |
||
Coordinates |
< 500 µ |
|
500 – 1000 µ |
>1000 µ |
||
Pupil center coordinates |
important for treating hyperopia and |
|||||
|
|
>3D astigmatism |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contd...
48 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography
Contd...
|
Normal |
Suspected |
|
Abnormal |
|
|
value(s) |
value(s) |
|
value(s) |
|
KPD |
<+0.75 |
+0.75 to +1.5 |
|
>+1.5 |
|
Anterior curvature map |
|
|
|
|
|
Maximal K |
important when treating hyperopia |
|
|||
Pattern |
refer |
to topographical patterns |
|
||
I-S Rabinovich ratio |
|
|
|
|
>+2 |
Skewed Steepest Radial |
|
|
|
|
|
Axis Index (SRAX) |
|
|
|
|
>22° |
Superior-inferior difference |
|
|
|
|
>1.5D when |
on the 4 mm circle |
|
|
|
|
the inferior is |
|
|
|
|
|
steeper |
|
|
|
|
|
>2.5 when |
|
|
|
|
|
the superior |
|
|
|
|
|
is steeper |
Elevation maps (within the |
|
|
|
|
|
4 mm central circle) |
|
|
|
|
|
Anterior |
≤12 µ |
13 - 15 µ |
|
>15 µ |
|
Posterior |
≤17 µ |
18 – 20 µ |
|
>20 µ |
|
Anterior-posterior |
|
|
|
|
|
difference |
<5 µ |
>5 µ |
|
|
|
Isolated island (or tongue |
might be an indicator for FFKC |
|
|||
like extension) |
or subclinical keratoconus |
|
|||
Corneal thickness map |
|
|
|
|
|
Shape |
|
|
cone like |
|
|
Superior-inferior difference |
<30 µ |
>30 µ |
|
|
|
Thinnest location difference |
|
|
|
|
|
between both eyes |
<30 µ |
>30 µ |
|
|
|
Keratoconus diagram |
|
|
|
|
|
Shape and location of the |
|
|
- out of normative range |
||
curve |
|
|
- deviation before the 6 mm circle |
||
Average |
1 |
|
1.1 – 1.2 |
|
> 1.2 |
Indices of irregularity |
white |
yellow |
|
red |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3.2: The ectasia risk score system for identifying eyes at high risk of developing ectasia after Lasik
Pattern |
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|||||
Topography |
Abnormal |
Inferior |
|
Asymmetrical |
Normal/ |
|
topography |
steepening/ |
|
bow tie |
symmetrical |
|
|
skewed radial |
|
|
bow tie |
|
|
axis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSB |
< 240 µm |
240 – 259 µm |
260 – 279 µm |
280 – 299 µm |
≥ 300 µm |
Age |
|
18 – 21 yrs |
22 – 25 yrs |
26 – 29 yrs |
≥ 30 yrs |
CT |
< 450 µm |
451 – 480 µm |
481 – 510 µm |
|
≥ 510 µm |
MRSE |
> -14.00 |
> -12.00 to |
> -10.00 to |
> -8.00 to |
|
|
|
-14.00 |
-12.00 |
-10.00 |
-8.00 or less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 Topography Pentacam Reading
50 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography
Table 3.3: Grading the risk of ectasia according to the scoring system shown in Table 3.2
Total risk score |
Relative risk |
Recommendations |
0-2 |
Low |
Proceed with Lasik or |
|
|
Surface |
3 |
Moderate |
Proceed with caution, special |
|
|
informed consent, safety of |
|
|
surface ablation unknown |
4 |
High |
Do not perform any |
|
|
|
•Progression index: The average (colored with red) should be no more than 1.
Table 3.1 summarizes all the above normal, suspected
and abnormal findings in the topography
SCORING THE CASE
After careful study of the topography, it is very important to score the case in order to exclude the risky cases and to decide correctly which modality of treatment is the best. Scoring each case must depend on the scoring system shown in Tables 3.2 and 3.3. This scoring system depends not only on the topographical pattern, but also on the proposed residual stromal bed (RSB), patient’s age and preoperative corneal thickness (CT) in the thinnest location.
