Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography (Basics and Case Study Series)_Sinjab_2010

.pdf
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
23.45 Mб
Скачать

Reading Pentacam Topography 41

Fig. 3.11: The thinnest location is severely displaced giving the thickness map the shape of a cone.

42 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography

2.The relation between the apex of the cornea and the center of the pupil: It is important in the issue of “decentration” or “offset pupil”.

3.The relation between the apex of the cornea and the thinnest location: This relationship could be according to thickness or to coordinates.

The relationship according to thickness: Let us look at Fig. 2.13 to compare the thickness at the apex with the thickness at the thinnest location. The difference should be no more than 10 µ and not increasing with follow up.

The relationship according to coordinates (Fig. 3.12): When the value exceeds -500 µ, it is a risk factor, especially when the difference is increasing with follow up at one to two years intervals. When this value exceeds -1000 µ, it is an important sign of an advanced keratoconus (see Fig. 2.13).

4.Look for the thickness on the 4 mm circle: There should be no more than 30 µ difference between the superior and inferior points (we will call this from now as superior-inferior difference).

Fig. 3.12: The relationship between pachy apex and thinnest location coordinates. The ‘y’ coordinate is more important than ‘X’; because the thinnest location is generally displaced vertically in the development of keratoconus or keratoectasia.

Reading Pentacam Topography 43

Fig. 3.13: The topometric map. Q-value measured and displayed in the four main sectors of the cornea.

5.Compare the thinnest location between the examined cornea and its fellow, the difference should be no more than 30 microns.

Topometric Map

Fig. 3.13 illustrates Q-value in four sectors of the cornea: nasal, temporal, upper and lower sectors. It also shows the average vertical and horizontal values. Fig. 3.14 shows Q-values in the four sectors of the cornea within circles centered on the apex of the cornea with 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm diameters (or in angles of 20°, 25°, 30° and 35° respectively).

The most important values are the vertical in general and the inferior in particular, as in Fig. 3.15. The normal

Fig. 3.14: Q-values according to different concentric rings and in the four main sectors.

44 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography

Fig. 3.15: The important Q-values in the topometric map. The average vertical in general and the inferior in particular.

value is < -0.5 (as an absolute value). It is border line when it falls between -0.5 and -0.55. If the value is > -0.55 (as an absolute value), we should hesitate a lot before proceeding to the standard Lasik treatment. The most important sector is the 6 mm or 20° sector.

Keratoconus Indices Page

Diagram of the relation between corneal thickness and location (Fig. 3.16).

Diagram of the relation between thickness increment and location (Fig. 3.17).

It is important for the red curve to be within the normal range and the course of the red curve to be parallel to the normal range. In certain cases the red curve deviates after few millimeters (Fig. 3.18). If the red curve deviates at the 6 mm circle or after, it is normal, otherwise it is a risk factor because the quick downward deviation means that the corneal center is relatively thinned in relation to the periphery, which proved to be risky either with Lasik, or to some extent with PRK, whether the patient is hyperopic or myopic.

Reading Pentacam Topography 45

Fig. 3.16: Mean corneal thickness values on rings concentrically to the thinnest location. The black dotted lines are the normal range and average in normative data. The red line is for the measured cornea.

46 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography

Fig. 3.17: Progression of corneal thickness. The black dotted lines are the normal range and average in normative data. The red line is for the measured cornea.

Reading Pentacam Topography 47

Fig. 3.18: The progression of corneal thickness of a keratoconic cornea. The measured red line is out of the normal range, and it deviates before 6 mm indicating a rapidly increasing thickness from the thinnest location towards periphery.

Table 3.1: The normal, suspected and abnormal findings in corneal topography

 

 

Normal

 

Suspected

Abnormal

 

 

value(s)

 

value(s)

value(s)

Quality specification (QS)

white

 

yellow

red

K-readings:

look

at flat K for myopic

>48

 

 

treatment, look at steep K

 

 

 

for hyperopic treatment

 

Corneal astigmatism

compare with manifest

> 6

 

 

astigmatism

 

 

Average Q-value

0 to -1

 

 

0,-1

Topometric map (vertical

 

 

 

 

 

and inferior Q-values)

 

 

 

-0.5 to -0.55

>-0.55

Thinnest location

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thickness

> 500

 

470 – 500

< 470

Difference in thickness

 

 

 

 

 

between patchy apex and

 

 

 

 

 

thinnest location

< 5 µ

 

5 – 10 µ

>10 µ

Coordinates

< 500 µ

 

500 – 1000 µ

>1000 µ

Pupil center coordinates

important for treating hyperopia and

 

 

>3D astigmatism

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contd...

48 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography

Contd...

 

Normal

Suspected

 

Abnormal

 

value(s)

value(s)

 

value(s)

KPD

<+0.75

+0.75 to +1.5

 

>+1.5

Anterior curvature map

 

 

 

 

 

Maximal K

important when treating hyperopia

 

Pattern

refer

to topographical patterns

 

I-S Rabinovich ratio

 

 

 

 

>+2

Skewed Steepest Radial

 

 

 

 

 

Axis Index (SRAX)

 

 

 

 

>22°

Superior-inferior difference

 

 

 

 

>1.5D when

on the 4 mm circle

 

 

 

 

the inferior is

 

 

 

 

 

steeper

 

 

 

 

 

>2.5 when

 

 

 

 

 

the superior

 

 

 

 

 

is steeper

Elevation maps (within the

 

 

 

 

 

4 mm central circle)

 

 

 

 

 

Anterior

12 µ

13 - 15 µ

 

>15 µ

Posterior

17 µ

18 – 20 µ

 

>20 µ

Anterior-posterior

 

 

 

 

 

difference

<5 µ

>5 µ

 

 

Isolated island (or tongue

might be an indicator for FFKC

 

like extension)

or subclinical keratoconus

 

Corneal thickness map

 

 

 

 

 

Shape

 

 

cone like

 

 

Superior-inferior difference

<30 µ

>30 µ

 

 

Thinnest location difference

 

 

 

 

 

between both eyes

<30 µ

>30 µ

 

 

Keratoconus diagram

 

 

 

 

 

Shape and location of the

 

 

- out of normative range

curve

 

 

- deviation before the 6 mm circle

Average

1

 

1.1 – 1.2

 

> 1.2

Indices of irregularity

white

yellow

 

red

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 3.2: The ectasia risk score system for identifying eyes at high risk of developing ectasia after Lasik

Pattern

Points

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

3

2

1

0

 

Topography

Abnormal

Inferior

 

Asymmetrical

Normal/

 

topography

steepening/

 

bow tie

symmetrical

 

 

skewed radial

 

 

bow tie

 

 

axis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSB

< 240 µm

240 – 259 µm

260 – 279 µm

280 – 299 µm

300 µm

Age

 

18 – 21 yrs

22 – 25 yrs

26 – 29 yrs

30 yrs

CT

< 450 µm

451 – 480 µm

481 – 510 µm

 

510 µm

MRSE

> -14.00

> -12.00 to

> -10.00 to

> -8.00 to

 

 

 

-14.00

-12.00

-10.00

-8.00 or less

 

 

 

 

 

 

49 Topography Pentacam Reading

50 Step by Step Reading Pentacam Topography

Table 3.3: Grading the risk of ectasia according to the scoring system shown in Table 3.2

Total risk score

Relative risk

Recommendations

0-2

Low

Proceed with Lasik or

 

 

Surface

3

Moderate

Proceed with caution, special

 

 

informed consent, safety of

 

 

surface ablation unknown

4

High

Do not perform any

 

 

 

Progression index: The average (colored with red) should be no more than 1.

Table 3.1 summarizes all the above normal, suspected

and abnormal findings in the topography

SCORING THE CASE

After careful study of the topography, it is very important to score the case in order to exclude the risky cases and to decide correctly which modality of treatment is the best. Scoring each case must depend on the scoring system shown in Tables 3.2 and 3.3. This scoring system depends not only on the topographical pattern, but also on the proposed residual stromal bed (RSB), patient’s age and preoperative corneal thickness (CT) in the thinnest location.