- •Preface
- •Contributors
- •Dedication
- •INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- •ACINETOBACTER
- •BACILLUS SPECIES INFECTIONS
- •ESCHERICHIA COLI
- •GONOCOCCAL OCULAR DISEASE
- •INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS
- •MICROSPORIDIAL INFECTION
- •MOLLUSCUM CONTAGIOSUM
- •MORAXELLA
- •PROPIONIBACTERIUM ACNES
- •PROTEUS
- •PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA
- •STREPTOCOCCUS
- •VARICELLA AND HERPES ZOSTER
- •PARASITIC DISEASES
- •PEDICULOSIS AND PHTHIRIASIS
- •NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS
- •INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
- •DISORDERS OF CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS IH
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS IH/S
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS II
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS III
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS IV
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS VI
- •MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDOSIS VII
- •DISORDERS OF LIPID METABOLISM
- •HEMATOLOGIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS
- •CAROTID CAVERNOUS FISTULA
- •DERMATOLOGIC DISORDERS
- •ERYTHEMA MULTIFORME MAJOR
- •CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDERS
- •PSEUDOXANTHOMA ELASTICUM
- •RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS
- •UVEITIS ASSOCIATED WITH JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS
- •WEGENER GRANULOMATOSIS
- •WEILL–MARCHESANI SYNDROME
- •SKELETAL DISORDERS
- •PHAKOMATOSES
- •NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1
- •STURGE–WEBER SYNDROME
- •NEUROLOGIC DISORDERS
- •ACQUIRED INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING NEUROPATHIES
- •CREUTZFELDT–JAKOB DISEASE
- •NEOPLASMS
- •JUVENILE XANTHOGRANULOMA
- •LEIOMYOMA
- •ORBITAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMA
- •SEBACEOUS GLAND CARCINOMA
- •SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
- •MANAGEMENT OF SCLERAL RUPTURES 871.4 AND LACERATIONS 871.2
- •IRIS LACERATIONS 364.74, IRIS HOLES 364.74, AND IRIDODIALYSIS 369.76
- •ORBITAL IMPLANT EXTRUSION
- •SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME
- •PAPILLORENAL SYNDROME
- •ANTERIOR CHAMBER
- •CHOROID
- •ANGIOID STREAKS
- •CHOROIDAL DETACHMENT
- •SYMPATHETIC OPHTHALMIA
- •CONJUNCTIVA
- •ALLERGIC CONJUNCTIVITIS
- •BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS
- •LIGNEOUS CONJUNCTIVITIS
- •OPHTHALMIA NEONATORUM
- •CORNEA
- •BACTERIAL CORNEAL ULCERS
- •CORNEAL MUCOUS PLAQUES
- •CORNEAL NEOVASCULARIZATION
- •FUCHS’ CORNEAL DYSTROPHY
- •KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS SICCA AND SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME
- •LATTICE CORNEAL DYSTROPHY
- •NEUROPARALYTIC KERATITIS
- •PELLUCID MARGINAL DEGENERATION
- •EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLES
- •ACCOMMODATIVE ESOTROPIA
- •CONVERGENCE INSUFFICIENCY
- •MONOFIXATION SYNDROME
- •NYSTAGMUS
- •EYELIDS
- •BLEPHAROCHALASIS
- •BLEPHAROCONJUNCTIVITIS
- •EPICANTHUS
- •FACIAL MOVEMENT DISORDERS
- •FLOPPY EYELID SYNDROME
- •MARCUS GUNN SYNDROME
- •SEBORRHEIC BLEPHARITIS
- •XANTHELASMA
- •GLOBE
- •BACTERIAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS
- •FUNGAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS
- •INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE
- •ANGLE RECESSION GLAUCOMA
- •GLAUCOMA ASSOCIATED WITH ELEVATED VENOUS PRESSURE
- •GLAUCOMATOCYCLITIC CRISIS
- •NORMAL-TENSION GLAUCOMA (LOW-TENSION GLAUCOMA)
- •IRIS AND CILIARY BODY
- •ACCOMMODATIVE SPASM
- •LACRIMAL SYSTEM
- •LACRIMAL HYPOSECRETION
- •DISLOCATION OF THE LENS
- •LENTICONUS AND LENTIGLOBUS
- •MICROSPHEROPHAKIA
- •MACULA
- •CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA
- •EPIMACULAR PROLIFERATION
- •OPTIC NERVE
- •ISCHEMIC OPTIC NEUROPATHIES
- •TRAUMATIC OPTIC NEUROPATHY
- •ORBIT
- •EXTERNAL ORBITAL FRACTURES
- •INTERNAL ORBITAL FRACTURES
- •OPTIC FORAMEN FRACTURES
- •RETINA
- •ACQUIRED RETINOSCHISIS
- •ACUTE RETINAL NECROSIS
- •DIFFUSE UNILATERAL SUBACUTE NEURORETINITIS
- •RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY
- •SCLERA
- •SCLEROMALACIA PERFORANS
- •VITREOUS
- •VITREOUS WICK SYNDROME
- •Index
Globe • 22 SECTION
Jackson TL, Eykyn SJ, Graham EM, et al: Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series and review of 267 reported cases. Surv Ophthalmol 48:403–423, 2003.
Kresloff MS, Castellarin AA, Zarbin MA: Endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol 43:193–224, 1998.
Mac I, Soltau JB: Glaucoma-filtering bleb infections. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:91–94, 2003.
Moshfeghi DM, Kaiser PK, Scott IU, et al: Acute endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Am J Ophthalmol 136:791–796, 2003.
Nelson ML, Tennant MTS, Sivalingam A, et al: Infectious and presumed noninfectious endophthalmitis after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Retina 23:686–691, 2003.
Olson RJ: Reducing the risk of postoperative endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol 49:S55–S61, 2004.
Reynolds DS, Flynn HW Jr: Endophthalmitis after penetrating ocular trauma. Current Opin Ophthalmol 8:32–38, 1997.
Speaker MG, Menikoff JA: Prophylaxis of endophthalmitis with topical povidone-iodine. Ophthalmology 98:1769–1775, 1991.
257 FUNGAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS
360.1
Rohit R. Lakhanpal, MD
Houston, Texas
Thomas A. Albini, MD
Houston, Texas
Eric R. Holz, MD
Houston, Texas
ETIOLOGY/INCIDENCE
Fungal endophthalmitis is classified according to its source. It is classified as exogenous when associated with an external source such as penetrating trauma, previous intraocular surgery (cataract extraction, penetrating keratoplasty, filtering bleb procedures or vitrectomy), or direct spread from corneal or scleral fungal infection. Exogenous fungal infections occur in immunocompetent individuals and are frequently seen in agricultural workers or in patients with organic foreign bodies, such as soil, leaves, or twigs in their eyes.
Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis results from the hematogenous spread of fungal infection to the eye from elsewhere in the body. Sources for endogenous fungal endophthalmitis include:
●Systemic opportunistic infections in immunocomprised hosts, as seen in:
●AIDS;
●Renal failure;
●Severe burns;
●Prolonged corticosteroid use;
●Chemotherapeutics;
●Hyperalimentation;
●Solid organ or bone marrow transplantation.
●Endocarditis (especially after cardiac valvular surgery).
●Gastrointestinal ulceration or surgery.
●Indwelling or long-term IV catheters.
●Shunts or prostheses.
●IV drug abuse.
Often the source cannot be identified, and as many as half of patients with presumed endogenous fungal endophthalmitis
have negative blood cultures and negative systemic evaluations.
Obtaining a careful history will be helpful in determining the most likely organism. For example:
●Candida species (yeasts) may cause endogenous or exogenous endophthalmitis and are more commonly associated with indwelling catheters, chronic antibiotic use, abdominal surgery, diabetes, immunosuppression with high dose corticosteroids or cytotoxic agents, intravenous drug abuse, and perioperative post-surgical endophthalmitis secondary to contamination of lens implants or irrigation fluids.
●Aspergillus species (septate filamentous fungi) may be associated with exogenous (grain farmers, poultry breeders, trauma) or endogenous endophthalmitis (intravenous drug abuse, cardiac surgery, liver transplantation, and leukopenia).
●Fusarium species (septate filamentous fungi) are associated with leukopenia, intravenous drug abuse, ocular surgery and predisposing keratitis.
●Blastomycosis species and Cryptococcus species may cause ocular infection through endogenous spread and may occasionally spread to the central nervous system.
The incidence of exogenous fungal endophthalmitis varies from 2–13% of all cases of exogenous endophthalmitis. The visual prognosis in exogenous fungal endophthalmitis is worse than that in endogenous disease, especially in those cases of endophthalmitis initially presenting as fungal keratitis. Organisms identified in exogenous fungal endophthalmitis associated with visual outcome 20/400 or better include Cylinrocarpon, Tubercularia, Aspergillus, Paecilomyces, and Candida; on the other hand, Acremonium and Fusarium species are associated with worse final visual acuity. Candida and Aspergillus are the most common cause of endogenous endophthalmitis, but Cryptococcus neoformans, Pseudoallescheria boydii, and other fungi have been reported. The incidence of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis has increased in the last few decades, correlating with the increased prevalence of the sources of endogenous infections listed above. Although the visual prognosis for patients with endogenous endophthalmitis has improved with more aggressive therapy, half of patients treated at one tertiary care center had final visual acuity of 20/50 or worse in spite of aggressive management. In multiple studies, high mortality rates, as high as 77% at two months, have been seen in patients with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The mechanism of exogenous fungal infections begins with the traumatic or surgical breakdown of conjunctival or corneal epithelium, providing the organism with a site of entry. Ulceration and abscess formation may follow. Localized immunosuppression, typically from topical corticosteroids, increases the likelihood of invasive fungal infections. Unlike bacterial keratitis, fungal organisms more often penetrate through the cornea into the anterior chamber causing progressive hypopyon and anterior chamber inflammatory membranes. This endophthalmitis can subsequently spread to include vitritis and chorioretinitis.
In endogenous fungal endophthalmitis, fungi gain access to the eye most often via the choroidal or retinal circulations. Patients with candidemia are at higher risk for this complication, with the rate of Candida endophthalmitis in these patients
474
between 28 and 45% of cases. Infection typically begins as a chorioretinitis. On histopathology, Candida endophthalmitis is characterized by small foci of retinal and uveal infection and suppurative granulomatous inflammation with multiple small foci of suppurative vitritis and infection. In contrast, Aspergillus endophthalmitis is most often localized to the subretinal and subretinal pigment epithelial spaces, and is associated with foci of deep retinal necrosis or chorioretinitis, vascular invasion, and a single larger area of suppurative vitritis. These characteristics are consistent with the clinical findings that visual recovery is less common with Aspergillus and positive vitreous cultures are more often obtained with
Candida.
DIAGNOSIS
Clinical signs and symptoms
Fungal endophthalmitis presentation varies depending upon the:
●Size of the intraocular inoculation;
●Patient’s relative immunocompetency;
however, days to weeks later, fungal endophthalmitis develops in spite of continuous systemic antifungal treatment. For this reason, some authorities recommend repeat examination of patients with candidemia two weeks after an initial negative exam.
Laboratory findings
A thorough history and ophthalmologic examination often strongly suggest the causative pathogen. Obtaining a fungal culture prior to the initiation of antifungal therapy is essential; this may be the only way to determine the identity of the infectious filamentous fungus or yeast while allowing for drug sensitivity testing, if necessary. Fungal culture may not be necessary in those cases where systemic cultures have already isolated the pathogen.
Acquisition of vitreous fluid either by aspiration alone (i.e. vitreous tap) or during vitrectomy provides a higher yield than aqueous fluid from the anterior chamber. In the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study, there was no added benefit of vitrectomy over aspiration alone. However, diagnostic vitrectomy is preferable to vitreous tap because aspiration without vitrectomy induces traction at points of vitreoretinal adhesion and may
●Concomitant administration of corticosteroids and antifunmiss a focal vitritis. Syringes containing intraocular fluids are
gal agents during the initial infection period.
Most often, patients present 7 to 14 days after inoculation with:
●Conjunctival injection;
●Varying levels of pain (mild or absent);
●Often only mildly decreased vision.
The presentation of fungal endophthalmitis is typically more indolent than that seen with bacterial endophthalmitis, with a slower onset and more chronic course. Anterior chamber reaction, including hypopyon, and vitritis with whitish plaques on the pars plana, lens capsule or intraocular lens may develop. Alternatively, the eye may be white and quiet. Typically, exogenous endophthalmitis excites more pronounced pain and anterior segment inflammation, while endogenous endophthalmitis produces less pain and a quieter anterior segment.
More fulminant infections may cause:
●Fibrinous membranes in the anterior chamber;
●Vitreous veils, snowballs, and/or calcific plaques in the posterior segment.
Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis may also be associated with:
●White, fluffy retinal infiltrates;
●Retinal hemorrhages.
Funduscopy of Candida endophthalmitis characteristically reveals focal white superficial retinal lesions associated with a fluffy white overlying vitritis. Multiple white-centered superficial retinal hemorrhages can also be seen. Subretinal infiltrates sometimes coalesce into a white subretinal nodule. In contrast, Aspergillus endophthalmitis produces a more severe chorioretinitis, with more rapidly progressing larger lesions, as well as vasculitis and areas of retinal necrosis and retinal hemorrhage. A large yellow macular infiltrate often develops, with preretinal or subretinal exudative layering to form a pseudohypopyon of the posterior pole. Other fungi may produce a chorioretinitis similar to that seen with Candida.
Often, initial examination of patients at risk for fungal endophthalmitis by an ophthalmologist may be unremarkable;
capped and taken directly to the microbiology laboratory for smears and inoculation of culture media. The vitrectomy canister is sealed and sent for vacuum filtration or centrifugation. If only a small amount of vitreous is available, tryptic soy broth (usually used for swabs) can be drawn into the specimen syringe along with a small air bubble, and mixed.
Smears are best prepared by placing one drop of each specimen on a glass slide and using a spatula to spread in a circular area 1 cm in diameter. These are then left to dry and carried to the microbiology laboratory for fixation and staining. Gomori’s methenamine silver (GMS) and calcofluor white, and Acridine Orange stains may be used to stain for organisms. Blood agar and Sabouraud’s dextrose agar containing gentamicin are the preferred culture media. One drop of specimen can be placed in brain heart infusion broth warmed to room temperature. Two specimen drops are placed on a calcium alginate swab, which can then be placed in the bottom of a Thioglycolate broth warmed to room temperature. Aspirates may also be sent for PCR for fungal DNA if available to facilitate early preliminary identification.
In every case, fungal cultures should be incubated at least 4 to 6 weeks for observation. Some laboratories routinely discard cultures that have no growth after 48 hours, but some fastidious organisms may be quite slow growing; cultures for suspected fungal endophthalmitis discarded before 28 days may be falsely read as negative.
TREATMENT
Therapy for fungal endophthalmitis may be instituted medically and/or surgically. Initially, removal of infecting exogenous agents (e.g. indwelling catheter), treatment of an external fungal infection (e.g. keratitis), and/or treatment of systemic conditions that may predispose to endogenous endophthalmitis (e.g. neutropenia secondary to chemotherapeutics) is warranted.
Medical
Medical therapy may be ocular or systemic. Prior to instituting therapy, however, aqueous and vitreous cultures are sent to microbiology for sensitivities.
257 EndophthalmitisCHAPTER Fungal •
475
Globe • 22 SECTION
Ocular
Ocular therapy for fungal endophthalmitis may be:
●Topical;
●Subconjunctival;
●Intravitreal.
Topical ophthalmic antifungal agents, while effective for fungal keratitis or scleritis (e.g. natamycin 5% ophthalmic suspension), do not provide adequate intravitreal drug levels required for the treatment of endophthalmitis. Poor vitreous penetration is also seen following subconjunctival deposition of antifungal agents. In addition, this route of administration has a higher risk of local side effects, such as pain at the site of injection. Intravitreal injection is then performed. Amphotericin B (5 μg in 0.1 mL) may be effective for most forms of fungal endophthalmitis. If a patient has not undergone pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), then the half-life of intraocular amphotericin B is approximately one week, and one should not repeat injection until that time has elapsed. In contrast, if a patient has undergone PPV, the drug is cleared within 24 hours of administration.
Systemic
Systemic therapy may be:
●Parenteral;
●Oral.
Intravenous drugs currently available for fungal endophthalmitis include:
●Amphotericin B;
●Fluconazole.
Both agents are effective against a wide spectrum of fungi and act by binding to sterols in fungal cell membranes, increasing cell membrane permeability and causing leakage of cell contents leading to cell death. Amphotericin B is given intravenously in doses of 0.5 mg/kg/day or 1 mg/kg every other day in a single infusion over 4 hours. The patient also must be premedicated with ibuprofen and diphenhydramine for some of the uncomfortable side effects. Fluconazole is a third-generation imidazole that may be administered either parenterally or orally in doses ranging from 200 mg to 400 mg/day.
In the past, the most effective oral agents against fungal endophthalmitis have been:
●Flucytosine is effective against Candida and Cryptococcus species, particularly when added to amphotericin B. However, resistance has been noted in over 50% of fungal isolates tested against the drug. In addition, there have been side effects reported, the most serious of which is pancytopenia; others include elevated liver function tests and hepatomegaly;
●Fluconazole has good antifungal activity, but after several weeks the physician must be aware of clinical depression setting in, which may necessitate discontinuance of the drug;
synthetic derivative of fluconazole, differing from this drug by the addition of a methyl group to the propyl backbone and by the substitution of a triazole moiety with a fluoropyrimidine group. These structural changes result in a higher affinity for the fungal enzyme lanosterol 14-a-demethylase, thus preventing the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol. Since ergosterol is essential to fungal cell membrane synthesis, depletion causes disruption of the membrane and cell lysis. Voriconazole has demonstrated greater activity against all Candida and Aspergillus species than all other antifungals currently available. Also, all endemic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium, Histoplasma,
Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and Cryptococcus species, are fully susceptible to voriconazole.
Voriconazole achieves therapeutic concentrations in both the aqueous and vitreous both after oral and intravitreal administration. Examination of the safety of intravitreal use of voriconazole showed: normal adult rats were injected with differing concentrations of voriconazole in one eye while the fellow eye was injected with saline, thus serving as a control. Serial electroretinogram (ERG) measurements of maximum scotopic b-wave, bmax, intensity needed for half saturation, I0.5, and saturated a-wave amplitude were measured in all eyes. Determination was made that there was no statistically significant difference in these parameters recorded between control eyes and voriconazole-injected eyes in any concentration groups. Histologic examination with light microscopy did not reveal any retinal abnormality in the eyes with 5 to 25vμg/mL intravitreal voriconazole. No statistically significant difference was noted between eyes treated with different concentrations of voriconazole versus the fellow control eyes treated with saline in terms of ERG findings. Thus, because of its broad spectrum of coverage, low MIC90 levels for the organisms of concern, good tolerability, and excellent bioavailability with oral administration, voriconazole may represent a major advance in the prophylaxis or management of both exogenous and endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.
Surgical
In most cases of fungal endophthalmitis, pars plana vitrectomy may be helpful to:
●Retrieve vitreous samples for culture of the causative organisms;
●Remove the bulk of infective material;
●Sterilize the vitreous cavity;
●Improve aqueous circulation into the vitreous to circulate therapeutic drug molecules and to wash out offending fungal elements.
When there is no specific vitreous pathology, one must search for fungal elements to culture from all sites. Often, centrifugation or filtration of vitreous specimens can concentrate organisms and improve the chances of obtaining a positive culture. In cases of recurrent infection or inflammation in patients with an intraocular lens, removal and culture of the intraocular lens implant and the entire capsular bag should be considered to
●Ketoconazole is another effective antifungal agent, particureduce potential scaffolding for infection. Iridectomy may also
larly against Blastomyces and Histoplasma species; |
be indicated if suspicion exists. In general, the chances of |
●Itraconazole, another third-generation imidazole, is effecobtaining a positive culture increase greatly with aspiration tive when combined with amphotericin B against Aspergil- of white, fluffy opacities, calcific plaques, or opacified portions
lus, Cryptococcus, Blastomyces, and Histoplasma species. |
of residual capsule rather than the relatively low yield of obtain- |
|
ing clear vitreous. |
Recently, a new antifungal agent, voriconazole, has been |
In most cases, pars plana vitrectomy must be combined with |
approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for sys- |
intravitreal injection of antifungal agents and concomitant oral |
temic fungal infection. Voriconazole is a second-generation |
or intravenous therapy. The prevailing treatment of choice cur- |
476
rently is PPV with intravitreal injection of amphotericin B plus oral voriconazole, thus achieving adequate vitreous concentration of two fungicidal drugs after clearing the infectious debris. Choosing an agent that has a low risk of retinal toxicity is important; this is another important reason that voriconazole is an effective choice.
COMMENTS
Generally, final outcomes after the development of fungal endophthalmitis depend upon a variety of factors:
●Timing of trauma or surgery to presentation;
●Type of matter inoculated (i.e. vegetable matter has poorer prognosis);
●Relative immunocompetency of the individual;
●Timing of administration of immunosuppressive agents and antifungals;
●Isolation of organism by culture;
●Access to medical care.
If all factors are equal, some fungi have better prognosis than others do. For example, in exogenous endophthalmitis, visual outcome of 20/400 or better is more likely when isolates include:
●Cylinrocarpon;
●Tubercularia;
●Aspergillus;
●Paecilomyces;
●Candida.
On the other hand, these species are associated with worse final visual acuity:
●Acremonium;
●Aspergillus;
●Fusarium.
In endogenous endophthalmitis:
●Candida and Aspergillus species are the most common causes;
●Cryptococcus neoformans, Pseudoallescheria boydii as well as other fungi have been reported.
Patients with Candida tend to have better outcomes than those with Aspergillus due to the fact that Candida infections are more accessible (i.e. in the vitreous versus in the deep retina and RPE). However, all patients with endogenous endophthalmitis are very ill. In fact, as stated earlier, high mortality rates, as high as 77% at two months, have been reported in multiple studies. Thus, mortality tends to be much higher in the endogenous versus the exogenous group.
REFERENCES
Barza M, Pavan PR, Doft BH, et al: Evaluation of microbiological diagnostic techniques in postoperative endophthalmitis in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1142–1150, 1997.
Binder MI, Chua J, Kaiser PK, et al: Endogenous endophthalmitis: an 18year review of culture-positive cases at a tertiary care center. Medicine 82:97–105, 2003.
Flynn HW, Jr: The clinical challenge of endogenous endophthalmitis. Retina 21:572–574, 2001.
Hua G, Pennesi M, Shah K, et al: Safety of intravitreal voriconazole: electroretinographic and histopathologic studies. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 101:183–189, 2003.
Pettit TH, Olson RJ, Foos RY, et al: Fungal endophthalmitis following intraocular lens implantation: a surgical epidemic. Arch Ophthalmol 98:1025–1039, 1980.
Pflugfelder SC, Flynn HW Jr, Zwickey TA, et al: Exogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 95:19–30, 1988.
Rao NA, Hidayat AA: Endogenous mycotic endophthalmitis: variations in clinical and histopathologic changes in candidiasis compared with aspergillosis. Am J Ophthalmol 132:244–251, 2001.
Stern WH, Tamura E, Jacobs RA, et al: Epidemic postsurgical Candida parapsilosis endophthalmitis: clinical findings and management of 15 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 92:1701–1709, 1985.
257 EndophthalmitisCHAPTER Fungal •
477
