Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Sjögren's Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapeutics_Ramos-Casals, Stone, Moutsopoulos_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.59 Mб
Скачать

378

 

G. Hernández-Molina et al.

Table 26.4 Methods for evaluating dry mouth

 

 

Test

Basis and method

Abnormal test

Reference

Whole saliva flow

Saliva collection may be

For the non-stimulated

[36]

collection

performed with or without

collection, an

 

Stimulated

stimulus during a 5- or

abnormal value is

 

Non-stimulated

15-min period

£1.5 mL/15 min

 

Wafer test

The main outcome is the time

The test is positive if the

[40]

 

of dissolution of the wafer in

time of dissolution is

 

 

the oral cavity

>4 min

 

Saxon test

Saliva production is quantified by

Normal production of

[41]

 

weighing a gauze before and

saliva in 2 min is

 

 

after chewing it for 2 min

³2.75 g

 

Imprint cytology

Cellulose acetate paper is applied

As the normal epithelium

[37]

of buccal

in the internal surface or the

is nonkeratinized, the

 

mucosa

inferior lip and stained with

presence of kerati-

 

 

hematoxylin and PAS

nized epithelium is

 

 

 

abnormal

 

Iodine-starch

A test tape 1 × 1 cm containing

Controls 9.4 ± 2.5 spots

[38]

reaction

iodine and starch is set on

Oral dryness 4.5 ± 3.1

 

 

labial mucosa anterior to the

spots

 

 

labial frenulum for 30 s. The

Sjögren 2.1 ± 1.3 spots

 

 

number of blue spots

 

 

 

corresponds to the number of

 

 

 

salivary gland ostia

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.3.11Ocular Cytology

Ocular cytology is an approach to analyzing the conjunctival surface. Cells are collected by imprint (using cellulose filters in the bulbar superior conjunctiva) or by brush cytology. The specimen is then evaluated for the presence of squamous metaplasia (Grade 0 = absent; Grade 5 = advanced keratinization), cell morphology (small and homogenous is the normal pattern), and presence of inflammatory cells (mononuclear, neutrophils). All of these features are abnormal in dry eye patients [19].

26.4Oral Tests

Methods for determining salivary gland function include salivary flow rate measurements (sialometry) and analysis of salivary composition (sialochemistry) [35, 36]. Other methods such as impression cytology of the buccal mucosa [37] and the use of iodine-starch reaction to know the number of lip salivary gland ostia have been described (Table 26.4) [38].

Sialometry is easy to perform and provides an objective measure, although normal values decrease with aging [39]. Some of the methods to quantify saliva production are the wafer test [40], the Saxon test [41], and the whole saliva collection (Table 26.4) [36]. On the other hand, sialochemistry is hampered by the lack of salivary reference values and the need for specialized equipment. Thus, their use is not common.

26 Diagnostic Procedures (I): Ocular and Oral Tests

379

26.4.1Wafer Test

The wafer test is a semiquantitative assessment that is useful for screening patients with early salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia. The results of the wafer test correlate with the flow of non-stimulated whole saliva. The main outcome of the test is the time of dissolution of the wafer. The patient is asked to sit in a relaxed and upright position and not to speak during the test. After swallowing any residual saliva, the wafer is put on the center of the subject’s tongue. Then the patient is asked to close the mouth and keep the wafer in the mouth without chewing or swallowing it. The swallowing of saliva is allowed. The test is considered as positive if the time to the dissolution of the wafer is more than 4 min [40].

26.4.2Whole Saliva Flow Collection

This is the most straightforward test in the determination of salivary flow. Flow rates ³0.3 mL/min are considered normal [42]. The collection may be performed with or without stimulus. Stimulated parotid flow may not correlate with the symptoms and may be normal even if basal secretion is reduced. In addition, it is difficult to obtain in patients who do not tolerate the cannula or the stimulus. Moreover, because a variety of stimulants (e.g., citric acid, gum, and others) have been used, there is a lack of agreement for normal values. Conversely, the non-stimulated whole saliva flow (NSWSF) reflects the basal flow from all glands taking place during most of the day. It is easy to measure and reproducible. The NSWSF is measured by the spitting method. Subjects are instructed to rest for 5 min before the test, to minimize orofacial movements, and not to speak. Before starting the procedure, the patient must swallow any residual saliva and allow all saliva to accumulate on the floor of the mouth and to spit it into a graduated test tube every minute. Saliva is collected for a period of 15 min and the measured volume expressed in mL/min [43]. A shortened version of the previously described technique more suitable for use in community surveys measures the volume in a 5 min period and is also available [1].

For the current SS criteria, an abnormal value is £1.5 mL/15 min [12]. The method has a sensitivity of 56.1%–64% and a specificity of 80.7% for SS [13, 44]. Salivary flow measurements are influenced by the time of day (maximal in the afternoon), degree of hydration, body position, smoking, exposure to light, and multiple different medications [45]. Thus, standardized procedures before the collection procedure are important. For example, patients should fast for at least 1 h before the procedure and refrain from brushing their teeth or smoking during this time.

26.4.3Saxon Test

A sterile 10 × 10 gauze sponge is weighted. After swallowing to remove any preexisting oral fluid, saliva is collected by vigorously chewing for 2 min. The amount of

Соседние файлы в папке Английские материалы