- •Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •Foreword
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •1.1.1 Diagnostic Criteria
- •1.1.2 Incidence
- •1.1.3 Prevalence
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Genetic Epidemiology of SS
- •2.3 Key Concepts in Genetics, Transcriptomics, and Proteomics
- •2.4 Candidate Genes and SS Pathogenesis
- •2.5 Gene Expression Studies in SS
- •2.6 Protein Expression Studies in SS
- •2.7 Future Directions
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 Characteristics of Autoimmune Lesions
- •3.3 Epithelial Cells as Key Regulators of Autoimmune Responses
- •3.4 Tissue Injury and Repair
- •3.4.1 Functional Impairment of Glands and Autonomic Nervous System Involvement
- •3.4.2 Extracellular Matrix and Tissue Damage
- •3.5 Pathogenetic Factors
- •3.5.1 Genetic Predisposition
- •3.5.2 Environmental Factors
- •3.5.3 Hormonal
- •3.6 Conclusions/Summary
- •References
- •4.1 Hepatitis C Virus
- •4.2 Hepatitis B Virus
- •4.5 Coxsackieviruses
- •4.6 Herpes Viruses
- •4.7 Human Parvovirus B19
- •4.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •5.1 The Role of T Cells in SjS
- •5.2 The Role of B Cells in SjS
- •5.2.1 The Impact of B Cell Cytokines
- •5.2.2 Ontogeny of B Lymphocytes
- •5.2.3 Subpopulations of B Cells
- •5.2.4 B Cell Monoclonal Expansion
- •5.3 B Cells Are Not Dispensable
- •5.3.1 B Cell Chemokines and Antibody Production
- •5.3.2 Peculiarities of B Cell Products: Cytokines and IgA Autoantibodies
- •5.3.3 Intrinsic Abnormalities of B Cells in Primary SjS
- •5.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3 Objective Determination of Salivary Flow
- •6.4 Etiology of Xerostomia
- •6.5 Orofacial Manifestations in SS
- •6.5.1 Salivary Involvement
- •6.5.2 Neurological Involvement
- •6.6 Sialochemical Changes in SS
- •6.7 Hyposalivation: Clinical Features and Complications
- •6.7.1 Clinical Features
- •6.7.2 Examination
- •6.7.3 Clinical Signs of Hyposalivation
- •6.7.4 Effect of Hyposalivation on Quality of Life
- •6.7.5 Management of Hyposalivation
- •6.7.6 Chronic Complications of Hyposalivation
- •Box 6.1: Chronic Complications of Hyposalivation
- •6.7.6.1 Dental Caries
- •Box 6.2: Strategies for Reducing Dental Caries in Patients with Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •6.7.6.2 Periodontal Health
- •6.7.6.3 Oral Functional Impairments
- •6.7.6.4 Oral Infections
- •Box 6.3: Factors Predisposing to Oral Candidiasis
- •6.7.6.6 Angular Stomatitis
- •6.7.6.7 Candidiasis
- •6.7.6.8 Bacterial Sialadenitis
- •6.7.6.9 Oral Ulceration
- •6.8 Salivary Gland Enlargement
- •6.8.1 Box 6.5: Non-Salivary Causes of Salivary Gland Enlargement
- •6.9 Salivary Swelling in SS
- •References
- •Key Websites (Accessed Dec 19, 2009)
- •7.1 Sjögren’s Syndrome: A Disease of the Lacrimal Functional Unit
- •7.2 Components of the Lacrimal Functional Unit
- •7.3 Lacrimal Gland
- •7.4 Conjunctiva
- •7.5 Cornea
- •7.6 Meibomian Glands and Eyelids
- •7.7 Neural Innervation
- •7.8 Mechanisms of Dysfunction
- •7.8.1 Lacrimal Gland
- •7.8.2 Ocular Surface
- •7.9 Diagnosis of Ocular Involvement in Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •7.10 Treatment of LFU Dysfunction
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Otologic Manifestations
- •8.3 Sinus and Nasal Manifestations
- •8.4 Laryngopharyngeal and Tracheal Manifestations
- •References
- •9.1 Epidemiology of Fatigue
- •9.2 Assessing Fatigue
- •9.4 Relationship of Fatigue to Cognitive Symptoms and to Depression
- •9.5 Fatigue Viewed From the Physiological Perspective: Relationships Between Fatigue, Sleep Quality, and Neuroendocrine Function
- •9.6 Relationship Between Fibromyalgia and SS
- •9.7 Management of Pain and Fatigue
- •9.8 Summary
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Arthralgias and Arthritis
- •10.3 Arthritis: Patterns of Expression
- •10.4 Differential Diagnosis: RA, SLE, and Other Arthropathies
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Epidemiology
- •11.3 Skin Changes Encountered in Primary SjS
- •11.3.1 Pruritus
- •11.3.2 Annular Erythema of SjS
- •11.3.3 Eyelid Dermatitis
- •11.3.4 Panniculitis
- •11.3.5 Primary Nodular Cutaneous Amyloidosis
- •11.3.6 B Cell Lymphoma
- •11.4 Skin Changes Encountered in Secondary SjS
- •11.4.1 Skin Changes Associated with Lupus Erythematosus
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Epidemiology
- •12.3 Histopathology
- •12.4 Laboratory Findings
- •12.5 Pathogenesis
- •12.6 Clinical Findings
- •12.7 Skin
- •12.8 Peripheral and Central Nervous System
- •12.9 Other Organs
- •12.10 Vasculitis and Mortality
- •12.11 Treatment
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Pericarditis
- •13.3 Myocarditis
- •13.4 Valvular Abnormalities
- •13.5 Diastolic Dysfunction
- •13.6 Atrioventricular Block
- •13.7 Subclinical Atherosclerosis
- •13.8 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
- •13.9 Autonomic Cardiovascular Dysfunction
- •13.10 Therapeutic Management
- •13.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Airway Disease
- •14.2.1 Overview
- •14.2.2 Pathology
- •14.2.3 Imaging Studies
- •14.3 Interstitial Lung Disease
- •14.3.1 Overview
- •14.3.2 Pathology
- •14.3.4 Usual Interstitial Pneumonia
- •14.3.5 Follicular Bronchiolitis
- •14.3.6 Lymphocytic Interstitial Pneumonia
- •14.3.7 Cryptogenic Organizing Pneumonia
- •14.3.8 Clinical Features
- •14.3.9 Imaging Studies
- •14.4 Pleuritis
- •14.5 Diagnosis and Management
- •References
- •15.1 Evaluation of the Sjögren’s Syndrome and Raynaud’s Phenomenon
- •15.2 Management of Raynaud’s Phenomenon
- •15.2.1 Vasodilator Therapy
- •15.2.2 Calcium Channel Blockers
- •15.2.3 Adrenergic Blockers
- •15.2.4 Nitrates
- •15.2.5 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors
- •15.2.6 Prostacyclins
- •15.2.7 Other Agents
- •15.3 Surgical Options
- •15.3.1 Sympathectomies
- •15.3.2 Management of Critical Digital Ischemia
- •References
- •16.1 Dysphagia
- •16.3 Chronic Gastritis
- •16.5 Association with Celiac Disease
- •16.6 Intestinal Vasculitis
- •16.7 Other Intestinal Diseases
- •16.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC)
- •17.2.2 Similarities, Differences, and Overlap Among SS and PBC
- •17.2.3 Epithelium Involvement
- •17.2.4 Animal Models
- •17.2.5 Histology and Serology
- •17.3 Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH)
- •17.4 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection and Sicca Syndrome
- •17.5 Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Liver Involvement in SS
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.3 Involvement of the Pancreas in SjS
- •18.3.1 Clinical Presentation
- •18.3.2 Autoantibodies
- •18.3.3 Pancreatic Enzymes
- •18.3.4 Pathology
- •18.3.5 Imaging Studies of the Pancreas
- •18.4 Autoimmune Pancreatitis
- •18.4.1 Introduction
- •18.4.2 Clinical Features
- •18.4.3 Imaging
- •18.4.4 Serology
- •18.4.5 Pathology
- •18.4.6 Diagnostic Criteria
- •18.5.1 Introduction
- •18.5.2 Nomenclature
- •18.5.3 Clinical Manifestations
- •18.5.4 Serological Issues
- •18.5.5 Pathology
- •18.5.6 Diagnostic Criteria
- •18.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Interstitial Nephritis in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •19.2.1 Historical Aspects
- •19.2.2 Clinical Features
- •19.2.3 Histology
- •19.2.4 Pathogenesis
- •19.2.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •19.2.6 Treatment
- •19.3 Glomerulonephritis in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •19.3.1 Historical Aspects
- •19.3.2 Clinical Features
- •19.3.3 Histology
- •19.3.4 Pathogenesis
- •19.3.5 Differential Diagnosis
- •19.3.6 Treatment
- •19.4 Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis and Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •19.4.1 Historical Aspects
- •19.4.2 Clinical, Cytoscopic, and Histologic Features
- •19.4.3 Pathogenesis and Association with Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •19.4.4 Differential Diagnosis
- •19.4.5 Treatment
- •References
- •20.2 Cerebral Lesions
- •20.3 Differential Diagnosis with Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome
- •20.4 Cranial Nerve Involvement
- •20.5 Diagnostic Algorithm of SS Patient with CNS Lesions, Myelitis, Meningitis
- •References
- •21.3 Sensorimotor Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
- •21.4 Multiple Mononeuropathy or Mononeuritis Multiplex
- •21.5 Sensory Ataxic Neuronopathy
- •21.6 Small Fiber Painful Sensory Neuropathy
- •21.7 Restless Leg Syndrome
- •References
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.2 Pathogenesis of Autonomic Dysfunction in pSS
- •22.3 Diagnostic Tests
- •22.4 Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Disorders
- •22.4.1 Secretomotor Disorder
- •22.4.2 Urinary Disorder
- •22.4.3 Gastrointestinal Disorder
- •22.4.4 Pupillomotor Disorder
- •22.4.5 Orthostatic Intolerance
- •22.4.6 Vasomotor Disorder
- •22.5 Diagnostic Algorithm of pSS Patient with Autonomic Dysfunction
- •22.6 Treatment
- •References
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.5 Prolactin and Sjögren Syndrome
- •23.7 Perspectives of Hormonal Treatment on Sjögren Syndrome
- •23.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.2 Gynecological Manifestations in Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •24.3.1 Epidemiology and Clinical Features of NLS and Congenital Heart Block (CHB)
- •24.3.2 Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in NLS
- •24.3.3 Diagnosis
- •24.3.4 Risk Factors
- •24.3.5 Pathogenesis of Congenital Heart Block
- •References
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2 Serum Proteins
- •25.2.1 Acute Phase Reactants
- •25.2.2 Gammaglobulins
- •25.2.2.1 Polyclonal Hypergammaglobulinemia
- •25.2.2.3 Circulating Monoclonal Immunoglobulins
- •25.3 Hematological Abnormalities
- •25.3.1 Normocytic Anemia
- •25.3.2 Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
- •25.3.3 Aplastic Anemia
- •25.3.4 Pure Red Cell Aplasia
- •25.3.5 Myelodysplasia
- •25.3.6 Pernicious Anemia
- •25.3.7 Leukopenia
- •25.3.8 Lymphopenia
- •25.3.9 Neutropenia
- •25.3.10 Eosinophilia
- •25.3.11 Thrombocytopenia
- •25.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •26.2 Questionnaires
- •26.3 Ocular Tests
- •26.3.1 Schirmer Test
- •26.3.2 Vital Dyes
- •26.3.3 Rose Bengal
- •26.3.4 Fluorescein
- •26.3.5 Lissamine Green
- •26.3.7 Tear Osmolarity
- •26.3.8 Tear Meniscus
- •26.3.9 Tear Proteins
- •26.3.10 Ferning Test
- •26.3.11 Ocular Cytology
- •26.4 Oral Tests
- •26.4.1 Wafer Test
- •26.4.2 Whole Saliva Flow Collection
- •26.4.3 Saxon Test
- •26.4.5 Impression Cytology
- •26.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •27.1 Salivary Scintigraphy
- •27.2 Sialography
- •27.3 Ultrasound
- •27.4 Tomography
- •27.5 Magnetic Resonance
- •27.6 Salivary Gland Biopsy
- •27.6.1 Labial Gland Biopsy
- •27.6.2 Daniels’ Technique
- •27.6.3 Punch Biopsy
- •27.6.4 Major Salivary Gland Biopsy
- •27.6.5 Lacrimal Gland Biopsy
- •27.6.6 Focus Score
- •27.7 Is There an Alternative to Labial Salivary Gland Biopsy?
- •References
- •28.1 Antinuclear Antibodies
- •28.3 Antibodies Against Nonnuclear Antigens
- •28.7 Antiphospholipid Antibodies
- •28.9 Anticentromere Antibodies
- •28.12 Rheumatoid Factor and Cryoglobulins
- •28.13 Complement
- •28.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •29.1 Introduction
- •29.2 Historical Overview and Sets of Criteria
- •29.3 Preliminary European Criteria
- •References
- •30.1 Introduction
- •30.2 Clinical and Serological Peculiarities of Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •30.3 Assessment of Disease Activity or Damage in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
- •30.4 Methodological Procedures to Develop Disease Status Criteria
- •30.5 Development of Disease Status Indices for Sjögren’s Syndrome
- •30.5.1 The Italian Approach
- •30.5.2 The British Approach
- •30.5.3 The EULAR Initiative
- •References
- •31.1 Introduction
- •31.3 Other Generic QoL/HRQoL Measures
- •31.6 Predictors of QoL and HRQoL (WHOQoL) in PSS
- •31.7 Therapeutic Interventions
- •31.8 Conclusions and Summary
- •References
- •32.1 Introduction
- •32.2 SS Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
- •32.3 SS Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- •32.5 SS Associated with Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
- •32.5.1 Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
- •32.5.2 Systemic Vasculitis
- •32.5.3 Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)
- •32.5.4 Sarcoidosis
- •32.6.1 SS Associated with Autoimmune Thyroiditis
- •32.6.2 SS Associated with Autoimmune Liver Disease
- •32.6.3 Association of SS with Coeliac Disease
- •32.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •33.1 Introduction
- •33.2 Methodological Considerations
- •33.3 Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome and Lymphoma
- •33.3.1 Risk Levels
- •33.3.2 Lymphoma Subtypes
- •33.4 Prediction of Lymphoma
- •33.4.1 Can We Tell Who Will Develop Lymphoma and When This May Occur?
- •33.4.2 Established Risk Factors
- •33.4.3 Recently Proposed Newer Risk Factors
- •33.5 Pathogenetic Mechanisms
- •33.6 Medication and Risk of Lymphoma in SS
- •33.7 Associated Sjögren’s Syndrome and Lymphoma
- •33.8 Other Cancers in SS
- •33.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •34.1 Introduction
- •34.2 Mortality and Causes of Death in pSS
- •34.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •35.1 Introduction
- •35.2 General Considerations
- •35.3.1 Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- •35.3.2 Xerostomia
- •35.3.3 Systemic Dryness
- •35.3.4 Extraglandular Manifestations
- •35.4 Diagnosis
- •35.4.2 Diagnostic Methods
- •35.4.2.1 Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- •35.4.2.2 Xerostomia
- •35.4.2.3 Salivary Gland Biopsy
- •35.4.2.4 Immunological Tests
- •35.4.2.5 Other Laboratory Findings
- •35.5 Comorbidities and Occupational Disability
- •35.6 Treatment
- •35.6.1 Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
- •35.6.2 Xerostomia
- •35.6.3 Management of Extraglandular Features
- •35.7 When to Refer to a Specialist
- •References
- •36.1 Background
- •36.2 General Approach to Dry Mouth
- •36.3 Additional Dental Needs of the SjS Patient
- •36.3.1 Background
- •36.4 Particular Oral Needs of the SjS Patient to Be Assessed by the Rheumatologist
- •36.5 Use of Secretagogues
- •36.5.1 Other Cholinergic Agonists
- •36.5.2 Additional Topical Treatments
- •36.5.3 Systemic Therapy
- •36.6 Oral Candidiasis
- •36.7 Treatment and Management of Cutaneous Manifestations
- •36.7.1 Treatment of Dry Skin in SjS Is Similar to Managing Xerosis in Other Conditions
- •36.7.2 Vaginal Dryness
- •36.7.3 Special Precautions at the Time of Surgery
- •References
- •37.1 Introduction
- •37.2 Marginal Zone (MZ) Lymphomas
- •37.2.1 Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas of MALT Type
- •37.2.2 Therapeutic Approaches of MALT Lymphomas
- •37.2.4 Managing NMZL
- •37.3.1 Histology and General Considerations
- •37.3.2 Treatment of DLBCL
- •37.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •38.1 Introduction
- •38.2 Antimalarials
- •38.4 Glucocorticoids
- •38.5 Azathioprine
- •38.6 Cyclophosphamide
- •38.7 Methotrexate
- •38.8 Cyclosporine
- •38.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •39.3 Mycophenolic Acid
- •39.4 Mizoribine
- •39.5 Rebamipide
- •39.6 Diquafosol
- •39.7 Cladribine
- •39.8 Fingolimod
- •References
- •40.1.2.1 Serum BAFF in SS
- •40.1.3 BAFF Is Secreted by Resident Cells of Target Organs of Autoimmunity
- •40.2 Rituximab in SS
- •40.2.1 The Different Studies Assessing Rituximab in SS
- •40.2.2 Safety of Rituximab
- •40.2.3 Increase of BAFF After Rituximab Therapy
- •40.3.1 Epratuzumab
- •40.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •41.1 Introduction
- •41.2 Cytokine Targeted Therapies
- •41.2.2 Etanercept
- •41.2.3 Interferon Alpha
- •41.2.4 Emerging Anticytokine Therapies
- •41.3 T Cell Targeted Therapies
- •41.3.1 Efalizumab
- •41.3.2 Alefacept
- •41.3.3 Abatacept
- •41.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •42.1 Introduction
- •42.2 Progression and Disease Activity in SjS
- •42.2.1 Saliva
- •42.2.2 Serum
- •42.2.3 Labial or Parotid Tissue
- •42.3 Molecular Targets for Potential Therapeutic Interventions
- •42.3.1 Interferons
- •42.3.2 Cytokines
- •42.3.3 B Cell Activating Factors
- •42.3.4 B and T Cell Receptors
- •42.3.4.1 Rituximab
- •42.3.4.2 Epratuzumab
- •42.3.4.3 Abatacept
- •42.4 Gene Therapy
- •42.5 Stem Cell Therapy
- •42.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
26 Diagnostic Procedures (I): Ocular and Oral Tests |
371 |
Table 26.2 Symptoms evaluation according to the American-European Consensus Group
I. Ocular symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions:
1.Have you had daily, persistent, troublesome dry eyes for more than 3 months?
2.Do you have a recurrent sensation of sand or gravel in the eyes?
3.Do you use tear substitutes more than three times a day?
II. Oral symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions:
1.Have you had a daily feeling of dry mouth for more than 3 months?
2.Have you had recurrently or persistently swollen salivary glands as an adult?
3.Do you frequently drink liquids to aid in swallowing dry food?
26.1Definitions
KCS is defined as a tear deficiency or an excessive tear evaporation that causes damage to the cornea and/or conjunctiva. It may be associated with ocular discomfort secondary to dryness. SS is the prototype of an aqueous deficient dry eye [7]. Symptomatic xerostomia is the subjective feeling of oral dryness [8]. Xerostomia is defined as flow rates £0.1 mL/min.
26.2Questionnaires
Some questionnaires are available to evaluate the presence dry eye. However, most of these questionnaires do not assess symptomatology with sufficient thoroughness [9]. In contrast, the Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ) characterizes the frequency of ocular surface symptoms and their diurnal intensity. The DEQ has been validated for the study of KCS [10, 11].
Two questions regarding oral and ocular symptoms are customarily included as items of the current primary SS classification criteria [12] (Table 26.2). These questions yield a sensitivity of 81.4% and 84.9%, respectively, with a specificity higher than 80% [13]. Moreover, the retest reliability of these questions 1 year later are 96.4% and 98.2%, respectively [14]. Nevertheless, the correlation between sicca symptoms and objective signs of glandular dysfunction is only moderate [1, 15]. A precise measure of symptoms, therefore, is an important aspect of making the diagnosis of either dry eyes or dry mouth. With regard to xerostomia, careful inspection of the mouth looking for angular cheilitis, saliva in the mouth’s floor, deep tongue fissures, candidiasis, and atypical caries is useful [5].
26.3Ocular Tests
The tests used most frequently to assess the integrity of the corneal surface and the volume and quality of tear film are the Schirmer-I test (Schirmer test), Rose Bengal staining, fluorescein or lissamine green staining, and the tear break-up time (Table 26.3) [16].
372 |
|
G. Hernández-Molina et al. |
|
Table 26.3 Methods for evaluating dry eye |
|
|
|
Test |
Basis and method |
Abnormal test |
Reference |
SchirmSchirmer-I Measure of tear secretion |
£5 mm |
[13, 26] |
|
and -II tests |
See text for details |
Sensitivity 76% |
|
|
|
Specificity 72% |
|
Break-up time |
Index of tear film stability |
£10 s |
[16] |
|
See text for details |
Sensitivity 77% |
|
|
|
Specificity 38% |
|
Vital stains |
Stain the ocular surface to |
Grading Bijsterveld score ³4 |
[29, 31, 32] |
|
discover abnormalities |
|
|
Rose Bengal |
See text for details |
Sensitivity 78% |
|
Lissamine green |
|
Specificity 67% |
|
Fluorescein |
|
|
|
Tear meniscus |
Measure of basal tear volume |
Normal value 0.3 ± 0.1 mm |
[16, 19] |
|
with a video meniscometer |
|
|
Tear osmolarity |
Osmolarity is increased as a |
Normal value |
[19] |
|
result of cytokines’ |
304 ± 1.4 mOsm/L |
|
|
liberation. It is measured |
A value ³312 mOsm/L |
|
|
with an osmometer |
identifies dry eyes |
|
|
|
(sensitivity 94%, |
|
|
|
specificity 97%) |
|
Tear proteins: |
Decrease in these proteins is a |
Normal value for lysozyme |
[17–19] |
lysozyme, |
reflex of glandular |
1–3 mg/mL and for |
|
lactoferrin |
dysfunction. Measured by |
lactoferrin 2 ± 1.1 mg/mL |
|
|
immunonephelometry, |
Lysozyme specificity 96%, |
|
|
agars gels, ELISA, |
sensitivity 25% |
|
|
spectrophotometry |
Lactoferrin specificity |
|
|
|
67–90%, sensitivity |
|
|
|
78–28% |
|
Ferning test |
An index of tear film stability. |
Uniform and abundant |
[20] |
|
A freshly produced tear is |
arborization (Ferning |
|
|
dropped on light micros- |
phenomenon) is absent |
|
|
copy slides, after |
|
|
|
evaporation at room |
|
|
|
temperature. |
|
|
|
Crystallization is observed |
|
|
|
without staining |
|
|
Brush cytology |
Analysis of conjunctival |
Only conjunctival epithelial |
[19] |
|
morphology. Type and |
cells should be found. It |
|
|
grade of inflammation |
is pathological when |
|
|
|
mononuclear cells or |
|
|
|
neutrophils are present |
|
Imprint cytology |
Evaluation of squamous |
Score ³2 has a specificity or |
[19] |
|
metaplasia. It is performed |
93% and sensitivity 30% |
|
|
under local anesthesia |
|
|
|
using cellulose filters. |
|
|
|
Score 0 (normal epithe- |
|
|
|
lium) to 5 (advanced |
|
|
|
keratinization) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 Diagnostic Procedures (I): Ocular and Oral Tests |
373 |
Rose Bengal staining, once a standard test in this disease, is now used less frequently because the application of the ocular stain is intensely uncomfortable to patients with KCS.
Because gradual destruction of the lacrimal gland in SS leads to diminished levels of tear proteins (lysozyme, lactoferrin, tear-specific prealbumin), some authors have proposed to measure these proteins to identify patients with dry eyes [17, 18]. Other tests, such as the tear film osmolarity, tear evaporation, tear meniscus, and ocular surface impression cytology, and crystallization, have also been studied (Table 26.3) [19, 20]. Although all of these methods provide different qualitative information, they have not achieved general clinical acceptance because of their lack of broad accessibility and general applicability.
26.3.1Schirmer Test
The Schirmer test, a practical, semiquantitative method, is a commonly used initial screening procedure for SS [13]. Some studies have reported a good correlation between in vivo fluorometric measurement of basal tear turnover and tear flow [21], as well as with the rose Bengal test [22]. Other studies, however, have not [23–25].
The Schirmer test may be performed with or without topical anesthetic. In order to assess the maximal tear production, a cotton-tipped swab can be introduced gently into the nose to stimulate the nasolacrimal gland reflex (via the trigeminal nerve) while performing the Schirmer test [26]. This is known as a Schirmer-II test. For some authors, the Schirmer-II test has a better correlation with staining tests [24].
During the Schirmer test, a standardized tear test strip is placed between the eye and the lateral part of the inferior eyelid. The patient is then inclined forward in a resting position at 45°, with eyes closed. After 5 min, the length of the wetted strip area is measured (Fig. 26.1). Humidification of £5 mm at least in one eye is required for a test result to be positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the test are 76.9% and 72.4%, respectively, when this cutoff value is used [13]. When the first test is positive in both eyes, the test-retest reliability at 1 year is 77.4% for one eye and 84.2% for both [14].
One of the factors that influences the results of the Schirmer test is the tear clearance rate. Consequently, a tear function index (TFI) has been proposed as a better tear measurement. The TFI is derived from dividing the Schirmer’s test value by the tear clearance rate, which is calculated by instilling 10 mL of fluorescein into the conjunctival fornix [27, 28]. Although the TFI is theoretically useful, it is not as simple to perform as the Schirmer’s test and is not widely used in clinical practice.
374 |
G. Hernández-Molina et al. |
Fig. 26.1 Schirmer-I test. Patient with absence of tear flow strip humidification after a time interval of 5 min. The lack of tear meniscus is also evident
26.3.2Vital Dyes
Vital dyes are any colored substance that contain auxochromes and are therefore capable of staining tissues. Vital dyes used in the field of ophthalmology have acceptable physiological and toxicological profiles. These dyes are used to detect abnormalities on the ocular surface. Positive staining is usually a relatively late manifestation of tear film disturbances or abnormalities of the ocular surface.
26.3.3Rose Bengal
The Rose Bengal method stains degenerated dead cells and cells that have a tendency to keratinization. Van Bijsterveld created a grading scale that divides the ocular surface into three zones: the nasal bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, and the temporal bulbar conjunctiva [29]. After instillation of the 1% Rose Bengal solution into the conjunctiva and asking the patient to blink one or two times, the intensity of staining of each area is scored. Each section is scored 1 (sparsely scattered), 2 (densely scattered), or 3 (confluent staining), such that a maximum score of 9 can be obtained.
KCS diagnosed when a grading Bijsterveld score ³4 in at least one eye is present (Fig. 26.2) [29]. The evaluation of the conjunctiva and cornea can be determined with an ophthalmoscope, although a more accurate evaluation with a slit lamp outfitted with a cobalt filter is preferred. Solutions of rose Bengal should not be left in the patient’s eye for a prolonged period, as this stain may be irritating and uncomfortable. In addition, it is important to remember that the specificity of the test is poor: Patients with infectious conjunctivitis or chronic, irritative conjunctivitis may also show an increased score [30]. The method has a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 81.7% [13].
