Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Sjögren's Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapeutics_Ramos-Casals, Stone, Moutsopoulos_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.59 Mб
Скачать

18 Pancreatic Disease in Sjögren’s Syndrome and IgG4-Related Disease

251

Pathological changes of the pancreas in autopsied patients with SjS who had no pancreatic symptoms during life have been described. These changes include moderate levels of chronic pancreatitis, atrophy, replacement of pancreatic tissue by vascular connective tissue, and lymphocytic infiltration [5, 30, 31]. Autopsy of patients with SjS who had known pancreatic dysfunction showed similar histopathological findings to those reported previously in cases of asymptomatic patients [18].

18.3.5Imaging Studies of the Pancreas

Evaluation of a group of patients with SjS and elevated pancreatic enzymes revealed no specific alteration in the morphology of the pancreas as assessed by computed tomography [17]. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of asymptomatic patients with SjS showed chronic pancreatitis-like changes in 2 out of 12 patients. None of these patients had radiologic changes characteristic of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) [32].

18.4Autoimmune Pancreatitis

18.4.1Introduction

AIP is a fibroinflammatory disease of the pancreas. Although this disease was described initially by Sarles and colleagues in the early 1960s, wider recognition took another 50 years [33]. The revival of interest in this disease was triggered by a case report from Japan [13]. In addition to reporting their case, the authors identified a cohort of previously published reports that describe patients with enlarged pancreata, many of which were responsive to glucocorticoids. We now believe that these cases were examples of AIP. In a landmark paper, Hamano and coworkers identified serum IgG4 as a biomarker of AIP [34].

Following the observation by Hamano and colleagues in serum, investigators demonstrated that the diseased pancreas in AIP is infiltrated with large numbers of IgG4-positive plasma cells [35, 36]. It is likely but unproven that the intrapancreatic IgG4-bearing plasma cells are the source of elevated serum IgG4 concentration. Another potential contributor to serum IgG4 elevation is IgG4-producing plasma cells infiltrating other organs as part of systemic IgG4-RD. Immunohistochemical detection of IgG4-positive plasma cells in pancreatic tissue is now widely regarded as a robust marker of AIP [35–37].

As pathologists examined their archived cases of pancreatitis, it became apparent that not all cases of AIP were associated with elevated serum and tissue levels of IgG4. It is now accepted that there are two forms of the disease “autoimmune-medi- ated” pancreatic inflammation, currently termed type 1 and type 2 AIP. Of these two

252

A. Khosroshahi et al.

Table 18.2 List of conditions believed to be part of IgG4-RD spectrum

Previous name

Target organ(s)

Mikulicz’s disease

Salivary and lacrimal glands

Küttner’s tumor

Submandibular glands

Riedel’s thyroiditis

Thyroid

Chronic sclerosing aortitis

Aorta

Inflammatory abdominal aortitis

Abdominal aorta

Retroperitoneal fibrosis

Retroperitoneum

Autoimmune pancreatitis

Pancreas

Sclerosing cholangitis

Biliary tree

Orbital pseudotumor

Orbital adnexa

Eosinophilic angiocentric fibrosis

Sinuses and nasal cavities

Multifocal fibrosclerosis

Various organs

Interstitial nephritis

Kidney

 

 

disease subsets, type 1 AIP is now viewed as being part of the IgG4-RD spectrum [36, 38]. Types 1 and 2 AIP have overlapping clinical and radiological features, but distinct differences exist between the two groups with regard to histopathologic features and relapse rates. Type 2 AIP may in fact be a novel form of chronic pancreatitis that should be considered an entirely separate category of disease [38].

18.4.2Clinical Features

The type 1 variant of AIP typically affects elderly males in their 60s and 70s [36, 38]. The prototypical patient is an elderly man who presents with painless obstructive jaundice and weight loss. These patients show little overlap with other forms of chronic pancreatitis. Specifically, they do not report episodes of acute pancreatitis, although some complain of mild abdominal pain.

Patients with type 2 AIP are younger, with a mean age of 52 years [36]. Moreover, in contrast to type 1 AIP, which affects male patients almost exclusively, the male:female ratio in type 2 disease is approximately 1:1. At presentation, patients with type 2 AIP also show overlap with other forms of chronic pancreatitis. In one series, two thirds of patients had abdominal pain. In rare patients, more overt overlaps between acute and chronic pancreatitis are observed, with recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation.

Type 1 AIP is a systemic disease even though the pancreas may appear to be the sole manifestation of the disease at presentation. The presence of tumefactive lesions in other organ, either synchronously or metachronously, often clinch the diagnosis of AIP (see Table 18.2). For example, the finding of such extrapancreatic disease as tumefactive enlargement of the submandibular glands in an elderly male with obstructive jaundice strongly favors the diagnosis of AIP over that of pancreatic carcinoma. Type 2 AIP is less likely to have extrapancreatic manifestations, but there does appear to be a connection between type 2 AIP and inflammatory bowel disease.

18 Pancreatic Disease in Sjögren’s Syndrome and IgG4-Related Disease

253

In contrast to SjS, AIP can have profound effects on both the exocrine and endocrine function of the pancreas. Up to 80% of patients with AIP demonstrate laboratory evidence of exocrine dysfunction and diabetes [39].

18.4.3Imaging

Two major radiologic abnormalities are observed in AIP: a diffuse enlargement of the pancreas and a focal tumefactive lesion [40]. Tumefactive lesions can bear close resemblance to pancreatic malignancies. CT imaging in AIP demonstrates an enlarged pancreas with a distinctive delay in the pattern of contrast enhancement [41, 42]. In addition, another highly suggestive sign of AIP is a capsule-like rim on the periphery of the pancreas. Pancreatograms in AIP typically show diffuse narrowings of the pancreatic duct, with ductal irregularities but without significant dilatation [43]. These characteristic imaging features, in conjunction with an elevated serum IgG4, often permit reliable diagnoses of AIP without the need for invasive testing. However, these criteria are not infallible and a pancreatic biopsy is often required, both to exclude carcinoma and provide confirmatory evidence of AIP (see Sect. 18.5.6).

18.4.4Serology

Serum IgG4 remains the most reliable biomarker of AIP [38, 44, 45]. However, while the significant majority of cases of type 1 disease show an elevated serum IgG4 (normal serum IgG4 <140 mg/dL), those with type 2 AIP do not [38]. The overall reported sensitivities of elevated serum IgG4 concentrations for the diagnosis of AIP vary from 68% to 95%, but this is likely affected by the stage of disease and the fact that some studies have included patients with type 2 AIP [44]. An extensive array of other antibodies have been associated with AIP including anti-lactoferrin, anti-car- bonic anhydrase II, anti-carbonic anhydrase-IV, anti-pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor, anti-amylase-alpha, anti-HSP-10, and antiplasminogen-binding protein (PBP) peptide autoantibodies [44, 46–48]. However, none of these antibodies have been validated, and the few studies available suggest that they are inferior to the serum IgG4 concentration as a disease biomarker. Of note, serum IgG4 levels are elevated in 10% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas [44]. Thus, no single serological test is diagnostic for AIP. IgG4 has also been suggested to be a potential biomarker for monitoring the disease recurrence. The search for a robust serological marker remains a major goal in AIP and IgG4-RD research (see below).

18.4.5Pathology

There are significant differences in the histopathology of the two forms of AIP. In fact the only consistent feature shared by the two forms of the disease is the

254

A. Khosroshahi et al.

Fig. 18.1 Fibroinflammatory infiltrate organized in a storiform pattern. This pattern of inflammation is seen both within the pancreas (autoimmune pancreatitis) and with IgG4-RD. Hematoxylin and Eosin stain

Fig. 18.2 Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Note the periductal chronic inflammatory infiltrate (arrow head) and intraductal neutrophilic infiltrate (arrow). Hematoxylin and Eosin stain

presence of periductal inflammation. Type 1 AIP is characterized by a storiform fibroinflammatory infiltrate, obliterative phlebitis, and occasionally obliterative arteritis (however, necrotizing features are absent) [36] (Fig. 18.1). In contrast, type 2 AIP shows a ductal pattern of injury, the most characteristic features of which are intraductal neutrophilic infiltrates, with microabscesses [36] (Fig. 18.2). More severe forms of ductal injury are also seen – ulceration and total loss of epithelial cells. These findings can be detected on needle biopsy specimens, enabling nonoperative management in many cases. Tissue immunostains for IgG4 have proven to be robust ancillary markers for the diagnosis of AIP. The presence of greater than 50 IgG4-positive plasma cells per high power field and an IgG4:IgG ratio of >50% is virtually diagnostic of type 1 AIP. Biopsies from patients with type 2 AIP lack this feature.

Соседние файлы в папке Английские материалы