Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Sjögren's Syndrome Diagnosis and Therapeutics_Ramos-Casals, Stone, Moutsopoulos_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
9.59 Mб
Скачать

426

 

 

 

 

C. Baldini et al.

Table 29.4 Prevalence of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome

 

 

 

Study

Criteria sets

Prevalence

Intra-study comparisons

2009 Turkey [28]

European

0.35 (0.17Ð0.65)

 

 

 

AECG

0.21 (0.08Ð0.46)

 

2008

Norway [29]

European

0.44 (0.34Ð0.57)

 

 

 

AECG

0.22 (0.15Ð0.32)

 

2006

Turkey [30]

European

1.5

(0.85Ð2.5)

 

 

 

AECG

0.6

(0.24Ð1.39)

 

1997

Denmark [31]

European

0.6Ð2.1

 

 

 

Copenhagen

0.2Ð0.8

 

1995

China [32]

Copenhagen

0.77 (0.44Ð1.25)

 

 

 

San Diego

0.34 (0.44Ð1.25)

Single observations

2006 Greece [33]

AECG

0.092 (0.08Ð0.10)

 

2005

Greece [34]

AECG

0.15 (0.09Ð0.21)

 

2004

UK [35]

AECG

0.45 (0.04Ð1.32)

 

1999

Slovenia [36]

European

0.6

(0.07Ð2.16)

 

1998

UK [37]

European

2.1

(1.13Ð2.58)

 

1997

Greece [38]

European

0.6

(0.19Ð1.39)

 

1989

Sweden [39]

Copenhagen

2.7

(1Ð4.5)

and La/SSB antibodiesÓ tend to restrict the diagnosis, excluding those with sicca symptoms, positive ocular and oral tests, and serological proÞles characterized by the ANA and RF positivity. For similar reasons, the AECG criteria may be too restrictive for use in daily clinical practice, particularly in early disease [40, 41]. The prevalence of Ro/SSA and La/SSB autoantibodies has been estimated to be respectively around 60% and 45% in pSS, these autoantibodies are particularly common in younger patients [42, 43]. Heavy reliance upon the minor salivary gland biopsy also creates potential problems, as the degree of lymphocytic inÞltration may be strongly inßuenced by the age or smoking and the reproducibility of the test is imperfect [44].

In conclusion, although the AECG criteria have been now widely adopted by the scientiÞc community, it is a common belief that some aspects of these criteria should be re-visited. ClassiÞcation criteria for SS remain a work in progress. The NIHsponsored longitudinal observational study known as the SjšgrenÕs International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) is likely to provide critical information on SS and future efforts on criteria development [45, 46].

Acknowledgments We thank Miss Wendy Doherty and Miss Luisa Marconcini for their valuable contribution in reviewing the text.

References

1.Nikolov NP, Illei GG. Pathogenesis of SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009;21(5): 465Ð70.

2.Fietta P, Delsante G, Quaini F. Hematologic manifestations of connective autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(1):140Ð54.

29 ClassiÞcation Criteria

427

3. Voulgarelis M, Tzioufas AG, Moutsopoulos HM. Mortality in SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(5 Suppl 51):S66Ð71.

4. Theander E, Jacobsson LT. Relationship of SjšgrenÕs syndrome to other connective tissue and autoimmune disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2008;34(4):935Ð47, viiiÐix.

5. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carson SE, et al. ClassiÞcation criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:554Ð8.

6. Iorgulescu G. Saliva between normal and pathological. Important factors in determining systemic and oral health. J Med Life. 2009;2(3):303Ð7.

7. Kikuchi M, Inagaki T, Ogawa K, Banno S, Matsumoto Y, Ueda R, et al. Histopathological investigation of salivary glands in the asymptomatic elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004;38(2):131Ð8.

8. Manthorpe R, Oxholm P, Prause JU, Schiodt M. The Copenhagen criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 1986;61:19Ð21.

9. Homma M, Tojo T, Akizuki M, Yamagata H. Criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome in Japan. Scand J Rheumatol. 1986;61:26Ð7.

10. Skopouli FN, Drosos AA, Papaioannou T, Moutsopoulos HM. Preliminary diagnostic criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 1986;61:22Ð5.

11. Fox RI, Robinson CA, Curd JG, Kozin F, Howell FV. SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Proposed criteria for classiÞcation. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(5):577Ð85.

12. Daniels TE, Silverman S, Michalski JP, Greenspan JS, Sylvester RA, Talal N. The oral component of SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975;39:875Ð85.

13. ArnettFC,EdworthySM,BlochDA,McShaneDJ,FriesJF,CooperNS,etal.The1987revisedAmerican association criteria for classiÞcation of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31:315Ð24.

14. Daniels TE. Labial salivary gland biopsy in SjšgrenÕs syndrome: assessment as a diagnostic criterion in 362 suspected cases. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:147Ð56.

15. Fox RI, Saito I. Criteria for diagnosis of SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Rheumatol Dis North Am. 1994;20(2):391Ð407.

16. Shah F, Rapini RP, Arnett FC, Warner NB, Smith CA. Association of labial salivary gland histopathology with clinical and serologic features of connective tissue diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1682Ð7.

17. Atkinson JC, Travis WD, Slocum L, Ebbs WL, Fox PC. Serum anti-SS-B/La and IgA rheumatoid factor are markers of salivary gland disease activity in primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:1368Ð72.

18. Daniels TE, Witcher JP. Association of patterns of labial salivary gland inßammation with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Analysis of 618 patients with suspected SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;6:869Ð77.

19. Prause JU, Manthorpe R, Oxholm P, Schi¿dt M. DeÞnition and criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome used by the contributors to the First International Seminar on SjšgrenÕs syndrome Ð 1986. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1986;61:17Ð8.

20. Workshop on diagnostic criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome: I. Questionnaires for dry eye and dry mouth. II Manual of methods and procedures. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1989;7:212Ð19.

21. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Moutsopoulos HM, Balestrieri G, Bencivelli W, Bernstein RM, et al. Preliminary criteria for the classiÞcation of SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Results of a prospective concerted action supported by the European Community. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36(3):340Ð7.

22. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Moutsopoulos HM, Coll J, Gerli R, Hatron PY, et al. Assessment of the European classiÞcation criteria for SjšgrenÕs syndrome in a series of clinically deÞned cases: results of a prospective multicentre study. The European Study Group on Diagnostic Criteria for SjšgrenÕs Syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 1996;55(2):116Ð21.

23. Fox RI. Fifth international symposium on SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(2):195Ð6. 24. Ramos-Casals M, Garcia Carrasco M, Cervera R, Rosas J, Trejo O, de la Red G, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection mimicking primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome. A clinical and immunologic descrip-

tion of 35 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2001;80:1Ð8.

25. Novljan MP, Rozman B, Jerse M, Rotar Z, Kveder T, Tomsic M. Comparison of the different classiÞcation criteria sets for primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006;35: 463Ð7.

428

C. Baldini et al.

26. Langegger C, Wenger M, Duftner C, Dejaco C, Baldissera I, Moncayo R, et al. Use of the European preliminary criteria, the Breiman classiÞcation tree and the AmericanÐEuropean criteria for diagnosis of primary SjšgrenÕs Syndrome in daily practice: a retrospective analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2007;27(8):699Ð702.

27. Binard A, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Fautrel B, Jousse S, Youinou P, Saraux A. Epidemiology of SjšgrenÕs syndrome: where are we now? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(1):1Ð4.

28. Birlik M, Akar S, Gurler O, Sari I, Birlik B, Sarioglu S, et al. Prevalence of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in Turkey: a population-based epidemiological study. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(6): 954Ð61.

29. Haugen AJ, Peen E, HultŽn B, Johannessen AC, Brun JG, Halse AK, et al. Estimation of the prevalence of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in two age-different community-based populations using two sets of classiÞcation criteria: the Hordaland Health Study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(1):30Ð4.

30. Kabasakal Y, Kitapcioglu G, Turk T, Oder G, Durusoy R, Mete N, et al. The prevalence of SjšgrenÕs syndrome in adult women. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006;35(5):379Ð83.

31. Bjerrum KB. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca and primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in a Danish population aged 30Ð60 years. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:281Ð6.

32. Zhang NZ, Shi CS, Yao QP, Pan GX, Wang LL, Wen ZX, et al. Prevalence of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in China. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(4):659Ð61.

33.Alamanos Y, Tsifetaki N, Voulgari PV, Venetsanopoulo AI, Siozos C, Drosos AA. Epidemiology of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in north-west Greece, 1982Ð2003. Rheumatology. 2006;45:187Ð91.

34. Trontzas PI, Andrianakos AA. SjšgrenÕs syndrome: a population-based study of prevalence in Greece: The ESORDIG study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1240Ð1.

35. Bowman SJ, Ibrahim GH, Holmes G, Hamburger J, Ainsworth JR. Estimating the prevalence among Caucasian women of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in two general practices in Birmingham, UK. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33:39Ð43.

36. Tomsic M, Logar D, Grmek M, Perkovic T, Kveder T. Prevalence of SjšgrenÕs syndrome in Slovenia. Rheumatology. 1999;38:164Ð70.

37. Thomas E, Hay EM, Hajeer A, Silman AJ. SjšgrenÕs syndrome: a community-based study of prevalence and impact. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1069Ð76.

38. Dafni UG, Tzioufas AG, Staikos P, Skopouli FN, Moutsopoulos MH. Prevalence of primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome in a closed rural community. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:521Ð5.

39. Jacobsson LT, Axell TE, Hansen BU, Henricsson VJ, Larsson A, Lieberkind K, et al. Dry eyes or mouth Ð an epidemiological study in Swedish adults, with special reference to primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome. J Autoimmun. 1989;2(4):521Ð7.

40. Brun JG, Madland TM, Gjesdal CB, Bertelsen LT. SjšgrenÕs syndrome in an out-patient clinic: classiÞcation of patients according to the preliminary European criteria and the proposed modiÞed European criteria. Rheumatology. 2002;41(3):301Ð4.

41. S‡nchez-Guerrero J, PŽrez-Dosal MR, C‡rdenas-Vel‡zquez F, PŽrez-Reguera A, Celis-Aguilar E, Soto-Rojas AE, et al. Prevalence of SjšgrenÕs syndrome in ambulatory patients according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria. Rheumatology. 2005;44(2):235Ð40.

42. Kassan SS, Mutsopoulos HM. Clinical manifestations and early diagnosis of Sjšgren syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1275Ð84.

43. Ramos Casals M, Tzioufas AG, Font J. Primary SjšgrenÕs syndrome: new clinical and therapeutic concepts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:347Ð54.

44. Morbini P, Manzo A, Caporali R, Epis O, Villa C, Tinelli C, et al. Multilevel examination of minor salivary gland biopsy for SjšgrenÕs syndrome signiÞcantly improves diagnostic performance of AECG classiÞcation criteria. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005;7(2):R343Ð8.

45. Whitcher JP, Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Heidenreich AM, Kitagawa K, Zhang S, et al. A simpliÞed quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the SjšgrenÕs Syndrome International Registry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(3):405Ð15.

46. Daniels TE, Criswell LA, Shiboski C, Shiboski S, Lanfranchi H, Dong Y, et al. An early view of the international SjšgrenÕs syndrome registry. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(5):711Ð4.

Chapter 30

Measurement of Chronicity and Activity

in Sjögren’s Syndrome

Claudio Vitali

Contents

 

30.1

Introduction...................................................................................................................

429

30.2

Clinical and Serological Peculiarities of Sjögren’s Syndrome ..................................

430

30.3Assessment of Disease Activity or Damage in Systemic

 

Autoimmune Diseases ...................................................................................................

431

30.4

Methodological Procedures to Develop Disease Status Criteria...............................

432

30.5

Development of Disease Status Indices for Sjögren’s Syndrome..............................

432

 

30.5.1

The Italian Approach ........................................................................................

432

 

30.5.2

The British Approach........................................................................................

434

 

30.5.3

The EULAR Initiative.......................................................................................

435

References.................................................................................................................................

 

438

30.1Introduction

Systemic autoimmune conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) are commonly characterized by prolonged episodes of activity, sustained by the underlying immunologic and inflammatory processes [1, 2]. The activity flares are clinically marked by the new appearance or worsening of signs and symptoms that are typical for each one of the different diseases. In some diseases, elevation of acute phase reactants or abnormalities of immunologic markers accompany active periods. If the active phase of the disease does not remit spontaneously or if remission is not achieved by treatment, a chronic phase of the disease may begin and irreversible damage can be produced in the involved organs and systems [1, 2].

Although the concepts of disease activity and damage are easy to formulate in theory, functional definitions have not been established for most autoimmune

C. Vitali

Department of Internal Medicine and Section of Rheumatology,

‘Villamarina’ Hospital, Piombino, Italy

M. Ramos-Casals et al. (eds.), Sjögren’s Syndrome,

429

DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-947-5_30, © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

 

Соседние файлы в папке Английские материалы