Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Pharmacotherapy_Rodrigues, Nguyen, Farah_2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
16.55 Mб
Скачать

Transplantation Epithelial Pigment Retinal Human of Status• 50chapteCurrent

inner cell mass), yet recent developments in the field may show promise in this route.

Bone marrow-derived cells

Bone marrow-derived stromal cells have recently been shown to differentiate into a wide variety of tissues and were also demonstrated to participate in the regeneration of many acutely injured tissues in the adult. Many groups have now shown recruitment of bone marrowderived cells into subretinal space in CNV or sodium iodate mice models, with the acquisition of RPE-like properties.32,33

Uncommitted hematopoietic stem cells and so-called facilitating cells have previously been more specifically implicated in the phenomenon. Coculture of green fluorescent protein-labeled, Sca+ bone marrow cells with mitomycin C-treated RPE leads to acquisition of RPE-specific proteins of the former.34 An enriched CD133+ fraction of hematopoietic progenitor cells injected intravitreally in albino mice adopted RPE characteristics such as pigmentation or expression of RPE-specific proteins in the subretinal space.35 Further elucidation of the mechanisms leading to these promising observations is important, since this would eventually provide a good source for autologous cells in elderly patients.

MANAGING DECONSTRUCTIVE REACTIONS INDUCED BY RETINAL DETACHMENT

RPE transplantation requires manipulation in the subretinal space and thus unavoidably creates temporary retinal detachments (RD). It is therefore important to discuss the consequences of this maneuver.

Work over the past two decades has elucidated many remodeling changes occurring with separation of both retinal layers; these changes are described in depth in a splendid review by Fisher et al.36 Virtually all cell types of the retina, including the RPE, have been shown to participate in “deconstructive” processing upon detachment. Müller and photoreceptor reactions have been studied most widely. Alterations in both cell populations are early avenues to retinal gliosis, which in turn causes synaptic “rewiring.”37 This phenomenon may explain why anatomically reattached patients often require many months until normal vision returns.

Although candidates for RPE transplantation will already have a retinal pathology and the dimension of surgical trauma might be small or negligible, retinal detachment-related phenomena may need consideration.

Given that macular translocation surgery creates panretinal detachments and some patients are able to recover up to 20/30 vision, this suggests that clinically the retina is able to tolerate such interventions. In analogy to the latter technique, the retina can be relatively atraumatically detached with a Ca and Mg-free solution. Reattachment is expected to be relatively rapid, as was shown in the rabbit. Neuroprotective strategies during detachment and reattachment, as recently proposed by Kubay et al.,38 will also be a future key to success for RPE replacement strategies.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Cellular replacement strategies for the RPE have the potential of being a curative therapy for all AMD forms and related retinal degenerations, yet clinical protocols show only modest success to the present date. Research over more than two decades in this and related fields has elucidated many potential mechanisms, in addition to challenges and drawbacks. Encouraging early RPE transplantation experiments under controlled laboratory settings were soon challenged by a variety of factors in patients with AMD. The unconditional eventual rejection and/or lack functional recovery with homologous transplants had set the stage for autologous transplants. Here then, many mechanisms came into play, aging and AMD-related alterations of the RPE and

BM perhaps being the foremost. Nevertheless, transplantation of uncultured autologous RPE in patients with neovascular AMD has demonstrated some success. Firstly, there is evidence that suggests improved visual rehabilitation along with a low complication rate after RPE suspension transplantation, when compared to membrane removal alone. Further, the transplantation of a full-thickness patch of RPE and choroid for the first time demonstrates long-term survival of transplanted RPE cells in the subretinal space of patients with neovascular AMD. However, the technically challenging surgery and high complication rate ethically question this treatment modality at present.

The shortcomings of freshly harvested RPE for transplantation could be overcome with tissue engineering to deliver RPE on a BM prosthesis. Stem cell-derived RPE-like cells were generated from several stem cell sources. They represent promising new sources for RPE replacement. However, in analogy, somatic RPE transplantation, cellular delivery, and aging changes in BM need to be addressed with prosthetics to ensure long-term function of stem cell-derived RPE. The need for an effective cell-based therapy is undisputable, since patients will always present at different stages of disease progression. Whether RPE transplantation ultimately represents a curative solution is unclear, but its potential application to all forms of AMD and related entities make it a worthwhile therapeutic endeavor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Jean-Marie Parel and Wiliam Lee from the Ophthalmic Biophysics Center at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute for developing cannulas for RPE suspension transplantation. Dr. Stanzel is grateful for support received via an E. Schrödinger postdoctoral fellowship (J2463-B13) from the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF), and Adele Rabensteiner Awards in 2002, 2005, and 2006 from the Austrian Ophthalmic Society and Rüdiger Foundation, Germany in 2009.

REFERENCES

1.Gouras P. Transplantation of the retinal pigment epithelium. In: Marmor MF, Wolfensberger TJ, editors. The retinal pigment epithelium. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 492–507.

2.da Cruz L, Chen FK, Ahmado A, et al. RPE transplantation and its role in retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007;26(6):598–635.

3.Binder S, Stanzel BV, Krebs I, et al. Transplantation of the RPE in AMD. Prog Retin Eye Res 2007;26(5):516–554.

4.Del Priore LV, Tezel TH, Kaplan HJ. Maculoplasty for age-related macular degeneration: reengineering Bruch’s membrane and the human macula. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25(6):539–562.

5.Tezel TH, Kaplan HJ, Del Priore LV. Fate of human retinal pigment epithelial cells seeded onto layers of human Bruch’s membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40(2):467–476.

6.Wang H, Ninomiya Y, Sugino IK, et al. Retinal pigment epithelium wound healing in human Bruch’s membrane explants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44(5):2199–2210.

7.Gullapalli VK, Sugino IK, Van Patten Y, et al. Retinal pigment epithelium resurfacing of aged submacular human Bruch’s membrane. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2004;102:123–137; discussion 137–138.

8.Peyman GA, Blinder KJ, Paris CL, et al. A technique for retinal pigment epithelium transplantation for age-related macular degeneration secondary to extensive subfoveal scarring. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22(2):102–108.

9.Algvere PV, Berglin L, Gouras P, et al. Transplantation of fetal retinal

pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration with subfoveal neovascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:707–716.

10.Yamamoto S, Du J, Gouras P, et al. Retinal pigment epithelial transplants and retinal function in RCS rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(11): 3068–3075.

11.Zhang X, Bok D. Transplantation of retinal pigment epithelial cells and immune response in the subretinal space. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39(6):1021–1027.

12.Algvere PV, Berglin L, Gouras P, et al. Transplantation of RPE in age-related macular degeneration: observations in disciform lesions and dry RPE atrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235(3):149–158.

13.Tamai M, Abe T, Tomita H. Autologous iris pigment transplantation in age related macular degeneration. In: Das T, editor. Retina: Current practice and Future Trends. Hyderabad, India:PARAS; 1999. p. 151–161.

14.Thumann G, Aisenbrey S, Schraermeyer U, et al. Transplantation of autologous iris pigment epithelium after removal of choroidal neovascular membranes. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118(10):1350–1355.

350

15.Aisenbrey S, Lafaut BA, Szurman P, et al. Iris pigment epithelial translocation in the treatment of exudative macular degeneration: a 3-year follow-up. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124(2):183–188.

16.Binder S, Stolba U, Krebs I, et al. Transplantation of autologous retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with foveal neovascularization resulting from age-related macular degeneration: a pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133(2):215–225.

17.Binder S, Krebs I, Hilgers RD, et al. Outcome of transplantation of autologous retinal pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration: a prospective trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(11):4151–4160.

18.van Meurs JC, ter Averst E, Hofland LJ, et al. Autologous peripheral retinal pigment epithelium translocation in patients with subfoveal neovascular membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88(1):110–113.

19.Stanga PE, Kychenthal A, Fitzke FW, et al. Retinal pigment epithelium translocation after choroidal neovascular membrane removal in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2002;109(8):1492–1498.

20.Maaijwee K, Missotten T, Mulder P, et al. Influence of intraoperative course on visual outcome after an RPE-choroid translocation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49(2):758–761.

21.Joussen AM, Heussen FM, Joeres S, et al. Autologous translocation of the choroid and retinal pigment epithelium in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(1):17–30.

22.MacLaren RE. Autologous transplantation of the retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2007;114:561–570.

23.Bindewald A, Roth F, Van Meurs J, et al. [Transplantation of retinal pigment pithelium (RPE) following CNV removal in patients with AMD. Techniques, results, outlook.] Ophthalmologe 2004;101:886–894.

24.Stanzel BV, Bindewald-Wittich A, Holz FG, et al. Vitreoretinale Eingriffe bei fortgeschrittener altersabhängiger Makuladegeneration. Spektrum der Augenheilkunde 2008;22(6):348.

25.Ma Z, Han L, Wang C, et al. Autologous transplantation of retinal pigment epithelium–Bruch’s membrane complex for hemorrhagic age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;50:2975–2981.

26.Phillips SJ, Sadda SR, Tso MO, et al. Autologous transplantation of retinal pigment epithelium after mechanical debridement of Bruch’s membrane. Curr Eye Res 2003;26(2):81–88.

27.Tsukahara I, Ninomiya S, Castellarin A, et al. Early attachment of uncultured retinal pigment epithelium from aged donors onto Bruch’s membrane explants. Exp Eye Res 2002;74(2):255–266.

28.Thumann G, Aisenbrey S, Schaefer F, et al. Instrumentation and technique for delivery of tissue explants to the subretinal space. Ophthalmologica 2006;220(3):170–173.

29.Ito A. Construction and delivery of tissue-engineered human retinal pigment epithelial cell sheets, using magnetite nanoparticles and magnetic force. Tissue Eng 2005;11:489–496.

30.Haruta M, Sasai Y, Kawasaki H, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of pigment epithelial cells differentiated from primate embryonic stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(3):1020–1025.

31.Klimanskaya I, Hipp J, Rezai KA, et al. Derivation and comparative assessment of retinal pigment epithelium from human embryonic stem cells using transcriptomics. Cloning Stem Cells 2004;6(3):217–245.

32.Harris JR, Brown GA, Jorgensen M, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells home to and regenerate retinal pigment epithelium after injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47(5):2108–2113.

33.Atmaca-Sonmez P, Li Y, Yamauchi Y, et al. Systemically transferred hematopoietic stem cells home to the subretinal space and express RPE-65 in a mouse model of retinal pigment epithelium damage. Exp Eye Res 2006;83(5):1295–1302.

34.Li Y, Atmaca-Sonmez P, Schanie CL, et al. Endogenous bone marrow derived cells express retinal pigment epithelium cell markers and migrate to focal areas of RPE damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(9): 4321–4327.

35.Harris JR, Fisher R, Jorgenssen M, et al. CD133 Progenitor cells from the bone marrow contribute to retinal pigment epithelium repair. Stem Cells 2008;27:457–466.

36.Fisher SK, Lewis GP, Linberg KA, et al. Cellular remodeling in mammalian retina: results from studies of experimental retinal detachment. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005;24(3):395–431.

37.Marc RE, Jones BW, Watt CB, et al. Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration. Progress in Retinal & Eye Research 2003;22:607–655.

38.Kubay OV, Charteris DG, Newland HS, et al. Retinal detachment neuropathology and potential strategies for neuroprotection. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50(5):463–475.

39.Bhatt NS. Experimental transplantation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells on collagen substrates. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;117:214–221.

40.Thomson RC. Manufacture and characterization of poly(alpha-hydroxy ester) thin films as temporary substrates for retinal pigment epithelium cells. Biomaterials 1996;17:321–327.

41.Hadlock T. Ocular cell monolayers cultured on biodegradable substrates. Tissue Eng 1999;5:187–196.

42.Thumann G. Descemet’s membrane as membranous support in RPE/IPE transplantation. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:1236–1238.

43.Ho TC. Tissue culture of retinal pigment epithelium following isolation with a gelatin matrix technique. Exp Eye Res 1997;64:133–139.

44.Oganesian A. A new model of retinal pigment epithelium transplantation with microspheres. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1192–1200.

45.Farrokh Siar L. Cryoprecipitate: An autologous substrate for human fetal retinal pigment epithelium. Curr Eye Res 1999;19:89–94.

46.Hartmann U. Human and porcine anterior lens capsule as support for growing and grafting retinal pigment epithelium and iris pigment epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:940–945.

47.Nicolini J. The anterior lens capsule used as support material in RPE cell-transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:527–531.

48.Lee CJ. Microcontact printing on human tissue for retinal cell transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1714–1718.

49.Turowski P. Basement membrane-dependent modification of phenotype and gene expression in human retinal pigment epithelial ARPE-19 cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2786–2794.

50.Singh S. Natural and artificial substrates for retinal pigment epithelial monolayer transplantation. Biomaterials 2001;22:3337–3343.

51.Tezel et al. Bruch’s membrane as a support for RPE transplantation. 5. annual vision research conference; Ft. Lauderdale, 2002;5.

52.Leng T, Huie P, Bilbao KV, Blumenkranz MS, Loftus DJ, Fishman HA. Carbon Nanotube Bucky Paper as an Artificial Support Membrane and Bruch’s Membrane Patch in Subretinal RPE and IPE Transplantation.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44(5):481.

53.Tezcaner A. Retinal pigment epithelium cell culture on surface modified poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) thin films. Biomaterials 2003;24:4573–4583.

54.Capeans C. Amniotic membrane as support for human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cell growth. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81: 271–277.

55.Stanzel BV. Amniotic membrane maintains the phenotype of rabbit retinal pigment epithelial cells in culture. Exp Eye Res 2005;80:103–112.

56.Ohno-Matsui K. The effects of amniotic membrane on retinal pigment epithelial cell differentiation. Mol Vis 2005;11:1–10.

57.Singhal S. Primary adult human retinal pigment epithelial cell cultures on human amniotic membranes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53: 109–113.

58.Yeung CK. The transfer of ocular cells using collagen. Cell Transplant 2004;13:585–594.

59.Yellachich D. Autologous iris pigment epithelium cultured on cellulose acetate membrane transplanted into the subretinal space of rabbits. ARVO Meeting Abstracts 2004;45:5168.

60.Lombardi L. Full Thickness Retinal Pigment Epithelium Explants Proliferate Into Epithelial Monolayers on Synthetic Bruch’s Membrane Substitutes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4152 [abstract].

61.Molnar FE. Synthetic Bruch’s Membrane Substitutes: Comparisons After Subretinal Transplantation With Cultured Iris Pigment Epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4154 [abstract].

62.Williams RL. Polyurethanes as potential substrates for sub-retinal retinal pigment epithelial cell transplantation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16: 1087–1092.

63.Stanzel BV. Culture of Human RPE From Aged Donors on a Potential Bruch’s Membrane Prosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1407 [abstract].

64.Lu JT. Thin collagen film scaffolds for retinal epithelial cell culture. Biomaterials 2007;28:1486–1494.

65.Stanzel BV. Perspektive: Tissue engineering bei RPE-Transplantation in AMD. Spektrum der Augenheilkunde. 2007;21:212.

66.Thumann G. The in vitro and in vivo behaviour of retinal pigment epithelial cells cultured on ultrathin collagen membranes. Biomaterials 2009;30:287–294.

Surgery and Pharmacotherapy • 5 section

351