Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Pharmacotherapy_Rodrigues, Nguyen, Farah_2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
16.55 Mб
Скачать

CHOROIDAL MELANOMA

PDT with verteporfin has shown promising results in animal studies of choroidal melanoma. However, few patients worldwide have undergone this treatment. In the management of lesions that have failed to respond to brachytherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy, PDT may prevent eyes from undergoing enucleation.30

The potential advantage of PDT for lesions close to the macula is a greater potential for preservation of visual acuity. The major disadvantage is the potential for external recurrence despite a normal internal retinal appearance, a complication well described with transpupillary thermotherapy. The role of PDT in this condition, either as primary treatment or as an adjuvant treatment with plaque brachytherapy, remains experimental.

RETINOBLASTOMA

PDT using verteporfin efficiently kills chemotherapy-resistant and nonresistant retinoblastoma cell lines and primary tumor cells in vitro, and it warrants further preclinical evaluation as a therapeutic option for the treatment of retinoblastoma.31

CONJUNCTIVAL IN SITU SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

There is histopathological evidence that PDT with verteporfin is effective in treating at least in situ squamous cell carcinoma. Further studies are required to investigate this proposed modality in order to assess whether cure rates, recurrence rates, and cost-effectiveness are comparable with other treatment modalities.32

PDT has also been effective in recurrent hyphema caused by abnormal intralesional blood vessels after proton beam irradiation of iris melanoma.

EFFICACY AND COMPARISON WITH OTHER AGENTS

Visual outcomes after PDT with verteporfin and other treatment modalities in patients with AMD are shown in Tables 43.1 and 43.2. In terms of general efficacy, PDT with verteporfin is able to prevent further severe visual loss. In AMD, the risk of a significant loss in vision is reduced to 50% compared to the spontaneous course of the disease.13

The recent development of anti-VEGF substances for use in clinical routine has markedly improved the prognosis of patients with neovascular AMD. Intravitreal treatment with substances targeting all isotypes of VEGF provide vision maintenance in over 90% and substantial improvement in 25–40% of patients with AMD.35,36 However, PDT using verteporfin seems to be the most promising treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.23

Verteporfin may still play an important role in the management of these patients, as the combination with occlusive therapies like PDT with verteporfin may offer a reduction of retreatment frequency and long-term maintenance of the treatment benefit.16

CONTRAINDICATIONS

PDT with verteporfin is contraindicated for patients with porphyria or a known hypersensitivity to any component of this preparation.

CORNEAL AND IRIS

NEOVASCULARIZATION

PDT with verteporfin may be effective for the treatment of corneal neovascularization secondary to different ocular conditions.33

PDT with verteporfin can partially obliterate anterior-segment neovascularizations secondary to ischemic central retinal vein occlusion, preventing the evolution towards advanced stages of neovascular glaucoma, but is not effective in cases with complete angle synechial closure.34

OCULAR COMPLICATIONS AND TOXICITY

Verteporfin therapy is a particularly safe treatment in terms of ocular safety. In AMD patients, serious adverse events, including acute severe vision loss, arteriolar or venular nonperfusion, retinal capillary nonperfusion, or vitreous hemorrhage, occurred in 3.8% of verteporfin-treated patients and 1.4% of placebo recipients. Severe vision loss (defined as a decrease of at least 4 lines of visual acuity occurring within 7 days of treatment) occurs rarely and is more often seen in the treatment of large occult lesions with a high initial BCVA.37

Table 43.2  Improvement of 3 lines with different treatments in age-related macular degeneration

Treatment modality

Lesion type

Study

Control

Difference

Study

PDT

Predominantly + minimum classic CNV

9%

4%

5%

TAP: 24 months

 

Occult CNV

5%

1%

4%

VIP: 24 months

Pegabtanib 0.3 mg

All CNV subtypes

6%

2%

4%

VISION: 24 months

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Predominantly. classic CNV

41%

6%

35%

ANCHOR: 24 months

 

Minimum classic + occult CNV

33%

4%

29%

MARINA: 24 months

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg (3-monthly)

All CNV types

13%

10%

3%

PIER: 12 months

Combination PDT–ranibizumab

Predominantly classic CNV

24%

5%

19%

FOCUS: 12 months

 

 

 

 

 

 

PDT, photodynamic therapy; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; TAP, treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy; VIP, Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy study; VISION, VEGF Inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization; ANCHOR, Anti-VEGF antibody for the treatment of predominantly classic choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration; MARINA, Minimally classic/occult trial of the anti-VEGF antibody ranibizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration; PIER, A phase IIIB multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection controlled study of the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab in subjects with subfoveal CNV with or without classic CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration; FOCUS, A phase I/II, single-masked multicenter study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple-dose intravitreal injections of rhuFab V2 I combination with verteporfin (Visudyne) photodynamic therapy in subjects with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Diseases Retinal in Mechanisms and Drugs • 4 section

303

Verteporfin Therapy: Photodynamic• 43 chapterand Photosensitizers

In lesions with serous detachment of the RPE, mechanical rips were observed. Expanding pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) and those with nonhomogeneous filling may represent high-risk lesions because they may eventually exert sufficient tangential stress to result in a spontaneous tear.38 In retinal angiomatous proliferation, RPE tears are more common when the PED exceeds 50% of the lesion. Visual recovery after RPE tear is uncommon but possible in some instances, especially when the fovea is spared and conserves the RPE.

No cases of retinal arteriole or venular nonperfusion were reported at the 50 J/cm2 light dose used in the clinical studies or in clinical practice. However, in the phase I/II dose-finding study, retinal arteriole and venular nonperfusion were seen at a higher light dose of 150 J/cm2. These data suggest that, to provide safe and effective treatment, the recommended light dose of 50 J/cm2 should not be exceeded.

The most frequently reported ocular adverse events were transient visual disturbances, which were reported at an incidence of 12.4–29.8% in verteporfin-treated patients and 6.8–12.8% in placebo patients.

No clinically significant ocular adverse events occurred in either treatment group in patients with pathologic myopia or OHS.20,21

SYSTEMIC COMPLICATIONS

AND TOXICITY

Verteporfin therapy is a particularly safe treatment in terms of systemic safety.

The most frequently reported nonocular adverse events to PDT with verteporfin are injection site reactions (including pain, edema, inflammation, extravasation, rashes, hemorrhage, and discoloration).37

Table 43.3 show the ocular and nonocular adverse events, listed by body system, that were reported more frequently with verteporfin therapy than with placebo therapy and occurred in 1–10% of patients.

Photosensitivity reactions were reported in 2.2% of patients. Compliance with photosensitivity protection instructions will minimize the potential for photosensitivity reactions.

Table 43.3  Adverse events, listed by body system, that were reported more frequently with verteporfin therapy than with placebo therapy and occurred in 1–10% of patients

Ocular treatment site

 

Blepharitis, cataracts, conjunctivitis/

 

 

 

conjunctival injection, dry eyes, ocular

 

 

itching, severe vision decrease with or

 

 

without subretinal/retinal or vitreous

 

 

hemorrhage

Body as a whole

 

Asthenia, fever, flu syndrome, infusion-

 

 

related pain primarily presenting as

 

 

back pain, photosensitivity reactions

Cardiovascular

 

Atrial fibrillation, hypertension,

 

 

peripheral vascular disorder, varicose

 

 

veins

Dermatologic

 

Eczema

Digestive

 

Constipation, gastrointestinal cancers,

 

 

nausea

Hematic and lymphatic

 

Anemia, decreased white blood cell

 

 

count, increased white blood cell count

Hepatic

 

Elevated liver function tests

Metabolic/nutritional

 

Albuminuria, creatinine increased

Musculoskeletal

 

Arthralgia, arthrosis, myasthenia

Nervous system

 

Hypesthesia, sleep disorder, vertigo

Respiratory

 

Cough, pharyngitis, pneumonia

Special senses

 

Cataracts, decreased hearing, diplopia,

 

 

lacrimation disorder

Urogenital

 

Prostatic disorder

 

 

 

PDT with verteporfin does not appear to cause teratogenicity, mutagenicity, hepatotoxicity, or significant cardiovascular toxicity.39

However, PDT has been reported to result in DNA damage. No studies have been conducted to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of verteporfin. It is not known how the potential for DNA damage with PDT agents translates into human risk. No effect on male or female fertility has been observed in rats following intravenous administration of verteporfin for injection up to 10 mg/kg/day.

PDT with verteporfin has a pregnancy category of C. Studies in animals have revealed adverse effects on fetus but there are no controlled studies in women. Thus, verteporfin should be given only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Verteporfin and its diacid metabolite have been found in the breast milk of one woman after a 6 mg/m2 infusion. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants from verteporfin, a decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or postpone treatment, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.

Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.

Multiple-dose studies in rats and dogs given intravenous verteporfin with and without light application showed treatment-related hematopoietic effects in the bone marrow, liver, and spleen only at doses at least 66 times higher than the single 6 mg/m2 body surface area (approximately 0.15 mg/kg) dose of Visudyne used clinically at 3-month intervals.39

DRUG INTERACTIONS

Drug interaction studies in humans have not been conducted with PDT with verteporfin.

Verteporfin is rapidly eliminated by the liver, mainly as unchanged drug. Metabolism is limited and occurs by liver and plasma esterases. Microsomal cytochrome P450 does not appear to play a role in verteporfin metabolism. Thus, clinically significant drug–drug interactions are unlikely, as NADPH-dependent enzymes, such as cytochrome P450 isozymes, do not play a significant role in verteporfin metabolism.4

Based on the mechanism of action of verteporfin, many drugs used concomitantly could influence the effect of PDT with verteporfin. Calcium channel blockers, polymyxin B, or radiation therapy could enhance the rate of verteporfin uptake by the vascular endothelium. On the contrary, compounds that quench active oxygen species or scavenge radicals (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide, β-carotene, ethanol, formate, and mannitol), and drugs that decrease clotting, vasoconstriction or platelet aggregation (e.g., thromboxane A2 inhibitors), may decrease PDT with verteporfin activity.

However, no obvious drug–drug interactions were seen in the pivotal placebo-controlled studies of PDT with verteporfin, in which 95% of the population received concomitant medications. including some of the above classes of agents.

It is possible that other photosensitizing agents (e.g., tetracyclines, sulfonamides, phenothiazines, sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agents, thiazide diuretics, and griseofulvin) could increase the potential for skin photosensitivity reactions.

SUMMARY AND KEY POINTS

Veteporfin is a second-generation photosensitizer, displaying rapid clearance and consequently a reduced period of skin photosensitivity compared with the first-generation photosensitizer, porfimer sodium.

PDT with verteporfin is a disease site-specific treatment modality that is particularly safe in terms of both systemic and ocular safety. It involves the local or systemic administration of a lipophilic photosensitizing drug that selectively accumulates within rapidly dividing cells, such as neovascular endothelial cells, tumor cells, as well as activated cells of the immune system, followed by irradiating the targeted disease site with nonthermal visible light of appropriate wavelength. In the

304

presence of molecular oxygen, the activation of the photosensitizer and energy transfer can lead to a series of photochemical reactions and generation of various cytotoxic species (e.g., singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species), and consequently induce apoptosis and necrosis of targeted cells and tissues.

PDT with verteporfin is an established treatment for oncological disorders and nononcological disorders, such as AMD and immunemediated conditions.

In ophthalmology, PDT with verteporfin is FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with predominantly classic subfoveal CNV due to AMD, pathologic myopia, or presumed ocular histoplasmosis.

Verteporfin therapy is a particularly safe treatment in terms of both systemic and ocular safety. In terms of general efficacy, the treatment is able to prevent further severe visual loss in patients with neovascular AMD with predominantly classic CNV.11–14

In patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, PDT with verteporfin seems to be the most promising treatment.23 Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of other treatments.

The recent development of anti-VEGF substances for use in clinical routine has markedly improved the prognosis of patients with neovascular AMD. Intravitreal treatment with substances targeting all isotypes of VEGF provide vision maintenance in over 90% and substantial improvement in 25–40% of patients.35,36

However, verteporfin may still play an important role in the management of these patients, as the combination with occlusive therapies like PDT with verteporfin may offer a reduction of retreatment frequency and long-term maintenance of the treatment benefit.

REFERENCES

1.Aveline B, Hasan T, Redmond RW. Photophysical and photosensitizing properties of benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA). Photochem Photobiol 1994;59:328–335.

2.Schmidt-Erfurth U, Hasan T. Mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;45:195–214.

3.Li JH, Chen YP, Zhao SD, et al. Application of hematoporphyrin derivative and laser-induced photodynamical reaction in the treatment of lung cancer: a preliminary report on 21 cases. Lasers Surg Med 1984;4(1):31–37.

4.Houle JM, Strong A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of verteporfin. J Clin Pharmacol 2002 May;42(5):547–557.

5.Allison BA, Pritchard PH, Levy JG. Evidence for low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated uptake of benzoporphyrin derivative. Br J Cancer 1994;69:833–839.

6.Chen WR, Singhal AK, Liu H, et al. Antitumor immunity induced by laser immunotherapy and its adoptive transfer. Cancer Res 2001;61:459–461.

7.Rousset N, Vonarx V, Eléouet S, et al. Effects of photodynamic therapy on adhesion molecules and metastasis. J Photochem Photobiol B 1999;52(1–3):65–73.

8.Pervaiz S, Olivo M. Art and science of photodynamic therapy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2006;33:551–556.

9.Bissonnette R, McLean DI, Reid G, et al. Photodynamic therapy of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis with BPD verteporfin. 7th Biennial Congress of the International Photodynamic Association; 1998 Jul 7–9; Nantes France, RC87: abstract no. 87.

10.Hendrich C, Huttmann G, Vispo-Seara JL, et al. Experimental photodynamic laser therapy for rheumatoid arthritis with a second generation photosensitizer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000;8(3):190–194.

11.Kaiser PK. Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: 5-year results of two randomized clinical trials with an open-label extension: TAP report no. 8. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006 Sep;244(9):1132–1142.

12.Bressler NM. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials. TAP report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:198–207.

13.Pieramici DJ, Bressler SB, Koester JM, et al. Occult with no classic subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions in age-related macular degeneration: clinically relevant natural history information in larger lesions with good vision from the Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) trial: VIP report no. 4. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:660–664.

14.VIP Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial including lesions with occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:541–560.

15.Kaiser PK. Visudyne In Occult CNV (VIO) study group. Verteporfin PDT for subfoveal occult CNV in AMD: two-year results of a randomized trial. Curr Med Res Opin 2009 Aug;25(8):1853–1860.

16.Schmidt-Erfurth U, Schlötzer-Schrehard U, Cursiefen C, Michels S, Beckendorf A, Naumann GO. Influence of photodynamic therapy on expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor 3, and pigment epithelium-derived factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003 Oct;44(10):4473–4480.

17.Maberley D, Canadian Retinal Trials Group. Photodynamic Therapy and Intravitreal Triamcinolone for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology 2009 Sep 11. [Epub ahead of print]

18.Schmidt-Erfurth UM, Richard G, Augustin A, et al. Guidance for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007 Aug;85(5):486–494.

19.Frank Holz. Preliminary results of the MONTBLANC study. The 2009 International AMD and Retina Congress. Athens, Greece. October 2009.

20.Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia with verteporfin. 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial-VIP report no. 1. Ophthalmology 2001;108:841–852.

21.Saperstein DA, Rosenfeld PJ, Bressler NM, et al. Verteporfin therapy for CNV secondary to OHS. Ophthalmology 2006 Dec;113(12):2371.e1– 2371.e3.

22.Ruiz-Moreno JM, Montero JA, Arias L, et al. Photodynamic therapy in subfoveal and juxtafoveal idiopathic and postinflammatory choroidal neovascularization. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006 Dec;84(6):743–748.

23.Gomi F, Tano Y. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and treatments. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008 May;19(3):208–212.

24.Chan WM, Lai TY, Lai RY, et al. Half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: one-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 2008 Oct;115(10):1756–1765.

25.Michels S, Michels R, Simader C, et al. Verteporfin therapy for choroidal hemangioma: a long-term follow-up. Retina 2005 Sep;25(6):697–703.

26.Blasi MA, Scupola A, Tiberti AC, et al. Photodynamic therapy for vasoproliferative retinal tumors. Retina 2006 Apr;26(4):404–409.

27.Ziemssen F, Voelker M, Inhoffen W, et al. Combined treatment of a juxtapapillary retinal capillary haemangioma with intravitreal bevacizumab and photodynamic therapy. Eye 2007 Aug;21(8):1125–1126.

28.Eskelin S, Tommila P, Palosaari T, Kivelä T. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin to induce regression of aggressive retinal astrocytomas. Acta Ophthalmol 2008 Nov;86(7):794–799.

29.Shields CL, Materin MA, Mehta S, et al. Regression of extrafoveal choroidal osteoma following photodynamic therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 2008 Jan;126(1):135–137.

30.Barbazetto IA, Lee TC, Rollins IS, et al. Treatment of choroidal melanoma using photodynamic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:898–899.

31.Stephan H, Boeloeni R, Eggert A, et al. Photodynamic therapy in retinoblastoma: effects of verteporfin on retinoblastoma cell lines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008 Jul;49(7):3158–3163.

32.Sears KS, Rundle PR, Mudhar HS, et al. The effects of photodynamic therapy on conjunctival in situ squamous cell carcinoma – a review of the histopathology. Br J Ophthalmol 2008 May;92(5):716–717.

33.Yoon KC, You IC, Kang IS, et al. Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for corneal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 2007 Sep;144(3):

390–395.

34.Parodi MB, Iacono P, Ravalico G. Verteporfin photodynamic therapy for anterior segment neovascularization secondary to ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008 Apr;36(3):232–237.

35.Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1419–1431.

36.Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, Sy JP, Schneider S, ANCHOR Study Group. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1432–1444.

37.Azab M, Benchaboune M, Blinder KJ, et al. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: meta-analysis of 2-year safety results in three randomized clinical trials: treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy and verteporfin in photodynamic therapy study report no. 4. Retina 2004 Feb;24(1):1–12.

38.Chang LK, Flaxel CJ, Lauer AK, Sarraf D. RPE tears after pegaptanib treatment in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2007 Sep;27(7): 857–863.

39.QLT Inc. Clinical Investigator’s Brochure. BPD-MA (verteporfin). 2003 (Data on File).

Diseases Retinal in Mechanisms and Drugs • 4 section

305