Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Pharmacotherapy_Rodrigues, Nguyen, Farah_2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
16.55 Mб
Скачать

A

siRNA

B

RISC

C

RISC

RISC

 

complex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RISC

 

Bevasiranib has been investigated in a phase I, open-label, dose esca-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lation study primarily to determine safety and potential dosing. Two

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

injections were given at 6-week intervals, using one of five doses (0.1,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.33, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0 mg/eye), to 15 eyes. The sample size of 3 eyes per

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

group was too small to make any determination on visual acuity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

responses. No bevasiranib was detected in the plasma of any patients,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

suggesting no systemic absorption. Additionally, there were no severe

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ocular adverse events attributable to the drug. Based on these findings,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

two phase II trials were initiated. These included the Cand5 Anti-VEGF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RNAi Evaluation (CARE) trial for AMD and the RNAi Assessment of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cand5 in diabetic macular Edema (RACE).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BEVASIRANIB FOR NEOVASCULAR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MACULAR DEGENERATION: PHASE II

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STUDY METHODS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

RISC

 

Target mRNA

E

RISC

 

RISC

F

Figure 40.1  (A) Double-stranded small-interference RNAs (siRNAs) are incorporated into a multiprotein endoribonuclease complex

(B) termed the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). (C) A helicase within the RISC unwinds the duplex siRNA, allowing its antisense strand to bind mRNA with a high degree of sequence complementarity (D). An RNase within RISC then degrades the target mRNA by cleavage (E, F), which results in silenced gene expression and reduced protein. The RISC can then bind with another target mRNA, repeating the process.

mechanism of action for the beneficial effects of siRNAs against VEGF is not known in many of these models, but the studies demonstrate that VEGF inhibition has beneficial effects on a wide variety of tumors.

DRUG USES IN RETINAL DISEASES

BEVASIRANIB FOR SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION

RNA interference has also been studied in several animal models of ocular disease. siRNA directed against VEGF was found to inhibit corneal neovascularization.30–32 siRNA-mediated inhibition of VEGF was also found to decrease tumor growth in a model of retinoblastoma, following subcutaneous delivery.33

Bevasiranib is a double-stranded siRNA directed against VEGF and was initially investigated in preclinical studies before progressing to human trials. It was found to inhibit ocular neovascularization in a murine model.9 It is believed that the siRNA primarily works by silencing VEGF mRNA. Recent work has elucidated another possible mechanism. Kleinman and colleagues demonstrated that CNV inhibition in mice is an siRNA-class effect and is sequence-independent, and that CNV suppression by nontargeted and targeted siRNAs requires activation of Toll-like receptor-3 (TLR3).34

The CARE study was a multicenter (28 sites nationwide), randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of 120 study eyes. Three dose levels of bevasiranib (0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 mg/eye in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio) were administered via intravitreal injection. Two injections of the same dose were given to the study eye, 6 weeks apart. Patients were required to have subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD, which was confirmed by fluorescein angiography, as interpreted by the Digital Angiogram Reading Center (New York, NY). The CARE study was approved by the institutional review board and sponsored by OPKO Health.

The primary inclusion criteria were: (1) patients 50 years of age or greater; (2) the presence of subfoveal classic, predominantly classic, or minimally classic CNV; (3) an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best corrected visual acuity of 20/50–20/320 (64–24 letters); and (4) subretinal hemorrhage of no more than 50% of the total lesion size with no hemorrhage in the center of the fovea. Minimally classic lesions had to show evidence of lesion activity, defined as the presence of subretinal hemorrhage and/or fluid and/or lipid or loss of one or more lines of visual acuity during the 12 weeks prior to screening visit or fluorescein-documented lesion growth of 10% or greater 12 weeks prior to screening visit.

The exclusion criteria prohibited patients with any of the following characteristics from entering the study: (1) more than two prior intravitreal injections of pegaptanib or administration less than 6 weeks prior to screening visit; (2) more than one prior verteporfin/photodynamic therapy in the study eye or administration less than 12 weeks prior to screening visit; (3) more than one prior intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide treatment or administration less than 24 weeks prior to the screening visit; or (4) periocular steroids less than 24 weeks prior to screening visit. Patients were also excluded if they had other ocular or systemic diseases which could have potentially interfered with the efficacy of bevasiranib or affected the interpretation of study results.

The screening visit was performed within 2 weeks of the initial bevasiranib injection. The intravitreal injection was given at day 0 and patients were examined 3 weeks following injection. An examination and second intravitreal injection of bevasiranib were given at week 6, followed by examinations at weeks 9, 12, 15, 18, 30, 52, and 104. Patients were withdrawn from the study if they withdrew their consent or had intercurrent illness which prevented continuing follow-up visits.

The intravitreal injection consisted of 100 l bevasiranib (0.2, 1.5, or 3.0 mg/eye) using a 30-gauge needle following sterilization of the eye using iodine scrub and topical antibiotics similar to aseptic techniques used for other intravitreal injections. Bevasiranib was supplied as a colorless solution in vials labeled numerically such that all clinical personnel (refractionist, principal investigator, examining physician, clinical coordinator) were masked to the dose of bevasiranib used. Outcome assessments were made based on refracted ETDRS visual acuity from the refractionist, adverse events from the study coordinator and examining physician, clinical examination data from the examining physician, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography.

Rescue therapy was allowed with a treatment approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for macular degeneration if it was determined that the disease progressed. Initially, verteporfin or

Diseases Retinal in Mechanisms and Drugs • 4 section

279

REDD14NP and Bevasiranib, 027, SIRNA Technology: RNA Interference• 40-Smallchapter

pegaptanib was used. Ranibizumab therapy was allowed later in the study once it was FDA-approved. The following criteria indicated disease progression: (1) loss of 6 lines or greater best corrected visual acuity and lesion growth documented by fluorescein angiography less than 12 weeks following the first bevasiranib injection; or (2) loss of 3 lines or greater of best corrected visual acuity and lesion growth documented by fluorescein angiography at 12 weeks or greater following the first bevasiranib injection. Lesion growth was defined for both groups as growth of 300% or more in lesions less than 2 disc areas, 200% or more for lesions of 2–4 disc areas, and 100% or more for lesions greater than 4 disc areas at baseline.

The intent-to-treat population consisted of all subjects who were randomized to a treatment, regardless of whether they received the assigned study drug. The modified intent-to-treat population consisted of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of intravitreal bevasiranib. The per-protocol population consisted of all randomized subjects who received two intravitreal bevasiranib injections and returned for at least one follow-up efficacy evaluation following the second dose. If subjects missed a study visit, the last observed carried forward (LOCF) was used for missing values. If rescue therapy was initiated, the LOCF for the visit prior to the rescue therapy was carried forward. Results were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.

Positive effects of bevasiranib were defined prior to the initiation of the study by stipulating primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean best corrected visual acuity change from baseline to 12-week evaluation for the three dose groups. Another primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage and number of eyes with less than 3 lines decrease in best corrected visual acuity (<15-letter decrease) for each dose group at 12 and 18 weeks posttreatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints were: change in total lesion size; choroidal neovascular membrane size; change in classic component and progression of classic component on fluorescein angiography; change in total lesion thickness (consisting of CNV thickness and pigment epithelial detachment thickness measured by OCT); presence or absence of retinal edema; and presence or absence of other architectural changes such as cysts.

BEVASIRANIB FOR NEOVASCULAR MACULAR DEGENERATION: RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population consisted of 129 eyes, the modified intent-to-treat population consisted of 126 eyes, and the per-protocol analysis consisted of 110 eyes which received both intravitreal bevasiranib injections and at least one follow-up visit. The safety analyses were conducted on the 127 eyes which received at least one bevasiranib injection (one eye was treated with bevasiranib but did not return for required follow-up visits). The efficacy analyses were based on the 110 eyes in the per-protocol analysis. The three groups in the per-protocol analysis were well balanced with respect to visual acuity and lesion type. The numbers of eyes with previous treatment for CNV were also similar between groups. Bevasiranib had an excellent safety profile with no cases of endophthalmitis and only one eye in the 3.0-mg group developed uveitis, which resolved with topical steroids. There were no unexpected systemic adverse events related to the drug and prior pharmacokinetic studies showed no detectable systemic absorption of bevasiranib following intravitreal injection.

The primary efficacy outcomes for change in distance vision are plotted in Figure 40.2. There were no statistically significant differences in visual acuity changes between the three dose groups. The other primary efficacy measure was the number of eyes with <3-line decrease in best corrected visual acuity (Table 40.1).

It is important to recall that bevasiranib blocks the production of VEGF from mRNA, but does not destroy VEGF already produced in the cytoplasm and released into the retina. It became apparent from analysis of this phase II data that treatment of the existing VEGF in the retina prior to injection of bevasiranib using a direct VEGF blocker such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or pegaptanib may be important since eyes treated with bevasiranib continued to have decreases in visual acuity, especially following the first intravitreal bevasiranib injection.

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

0

9

12

15

18

ETDRS letters

−5

 

 

 

 

 

−10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2 mg

 

 

 

 

−15

 

1.5 mg

 

 

 

 

 

3.0 mg

 

 

 

 

−20

 

 

 

 

 

Time (weeks)

Figure 40.2  The mean distance visual acuity in eyes with choroidal neovascularization declined 1–2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) lines in all three dose groups after two injections of the small-interference RNA inhibitor bevasiranib at time 0 and 6 weeks, with no statistically significant difference between the three dose groups.

therapy

10

 

 

 

 

 

0.9

 

 

 

 

 

0.8

 

 

 

 

 

rescue

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

 

 

on

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

not

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

of

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

Probability

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

50

100

150

200

250

 

 

Week 6

 

Week 18

 

Day 225

 

 

2nd injection

 

 

 

separation

 

 

Time from first injection (days)

between dose

 

 

0.2 mg/eye

1.5 mg/eye

3.0 mg/eye

Figure 40.3  The time to rescue therapy which was triggered by vision loss was substantially greater in the higher-dose bevasiranib groups than the lower-dose bevasiranib group, suggesting a longer duration of action at up to 32 weeks following the first bevasiranib injection. This does suggest a dose-related effect of bevasiranib, with higher doses giving more inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor production.

The time to rescue therapy was shorter (154 days) for eyes treated with the lower-dose (0.2 mg) compared to the higher-dose (1.5 and 3.0 mg) groups, where the median time to rescue therapy was not reached, suggesting that the higher-dose group exhibited more long-term inhibition of CNV (Figure 40.3). This beneficial difference between the higher and lower doses of bevasiranib did not persist when the entire 2-year data set was analyzed.

Bevasiranib was found to be well tolerated with no significant safety concerns up to doses of 3.0 mg/eye at 6-week intervals. The primary endpoints of: (1) mean change in visual acuity; and (2) loss of less than 15 ETDRS letters (3 lines) did not show statistically significant differences between the three groups. There are several explanations for this finding. The first is that the design of the phase II study did not eliminate existing VEGF, which continued to cause vision loss in the early

280

Table 40.1  Bevasiranib for choroidal neovascularization: distance visual acuity: weeks 3–15 and weeks 3–18

Best corrected

0.2 mg

1.5 mg

3.0 mg

All bevasiranib

distance visual acuity

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

Week 15

 

 

 

 

n

34

39

37

110

Acuity gain (≥0 letter gain)

10 (29.4%)

12 (30.8%)

14 (37.8%)

36 (32.7%)

Stable or improved (<15

31 (91.2%)

29 (74.4%)

30 (81.1%)

90 (81.8%)

letters loss)

 

 

 

 

Week 18

 

 

 

 

Acuity gain (≥0 letter gain)

13 (38.2%)

11 (28.2%)

12 (32.4%)

36 (32.7%)

Stable or improved (<15

30 (88.2%)

32 (82.1%)

28 (75.7%)

90 (81.8%)

letters loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

portions of the study before the biologic effects of bevasiranib could manifest themselves using the study endpoints. Alternatively, the number of bevasiranib injections (2) may have been too small to detect a statistically significant difference. Prior studies with VEGF inhibitors delivered regular intravitreal injections for a minimum of 1 year, rather than two doses 6 weeks apart. Additionally, it is possible that the lowdose group had a biologic effect in inhibiting CNV; consequently, there was no difference between the three groups. Finally, the bevasiranib may not have had any measurable effect on CNV associated with AMD.

A potentially more appropriate study design might be to treat patients initially with direct VEGF inhibitors such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or pegaptanib and then to use bevasiranib to help maintain stability of visual acuity and VEGF inhibition. This would eliminate existing VEGF with the potential that bevasiranib would prevent new VEGF from being produced. The phase III Combining Bevasiranib and Lucentis Therapy (COBALT) clinical trial evaluated whether bevasiranib can be used as maintenance therapy for neovascular AMD. In this study, patients were initially treated with three doses of ranibizumab combined with bevasiranib every 8–12 weeks. The study design used ranibizumab to eliminate the VEGF which had already been produced and then used bevasiranib to prevent additional production of VEGF. The control population consisted of eyes treated with ranibizumab every 4 weeks. The Independent Data Safety and Monitoring Committee for the COBALT study recommended termination of the study in early 2009 as the two bevasiranib arms were unlikely to equal the ranibizumab arm in the noninferiority trial study design. There were no significant safety concerns prompting termination of the trial. Details concerning the three treatment arms were not available at the time this manuscript was written.

BEVASIRANIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA (DME)

The RACE trial was a phase II clinical trial which evaluated the shortterm treatment of intravitreal bevasiranib for DME. The inclusion criteria consisted of eyes with visual acuities from 20/40 to 20/320 with retinal thickening of 250 µm or greater in the central OCT subfield. Eyes were excluded if patients had panretinal laser or focal laser within 12 weeks of study entry or had any periocular or intravitreal steroids within 6 months. Eyes were given 0.2 mg (18 eyes), 1.5 mg (12 eyes), or 3.0 mg (18 eyes) bevasiranib at baseline, week 4, and week 8. The primary endpoint was mean OCT change at 12 weeks. The modified intent-to-treat population consisted of 18 eyes in the 0.2-mg group, 11 eyes in the 1.5-mg group and 17 eyes in the 3.0-mg group. There was no significant change in OCT at 12 weeks (8.9 µm) but there was tremendous variability in response, with a mean loss of 548 µm in one eye and a gain of 310 µm in another eye (Figure 40.4). Visual acuity results were parallel, with a mean gain of 0.1 letters (range 39 to + 21 letters; Figure 40.5). There were no significant systemic or ocular safety problems. Iritis was noted in 4/17 eyes in the 3.0-mg group but none of these

thickness

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

macular

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OCT

0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

 

in

−20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

−60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time (weeks)

 

 

 

0.2 mg 1.5 mg 3.0 mg Mean

Figure 40.4  Intravitreal bevasiranib was also tested in eyes with diabetic macular edema and only the 1.5-mg treatment group showed a mean decrease in foveal thickness. The differences between groups were not statistically significant. OCT, ocular coherence tomography.

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

3

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Letters

0

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−1

 

 

 

 

 

−2

 

 

−2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−3

 

−3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−4

 

Letters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2 mg/eye

1.5 mg/eye

3.0 mg/eye

Mean

Figure 40.5  The mean visual acuity following bevasiranib for diabetic macular edema showed variable results, with no net change in the mean visual acuity by 12 weeks.

eyes had vitreous inflammation. The results of this study were likely limited by study design for the same issues identified in the CARE study. The use of bevasiranib in eyes with DME did not eliminate existing VEGF in the retina and vitreous cavity, so any potential effect of the treatment would be delayed until existing VEGF were degraded. Additionally, the injection duration may have been too short to identify

Diseases Retinal in Mechanisms and Drugs • 4 section

281

REDD14NP and Bevasiranib, 027, SIRNA Technology: RNA Interference• 40-Smallchapter

a possible latent effect of bevasiranib on DME. At this time, there are no plans to proceed with additional studies to evaluate further the role of bevasiranib in the management of DME. Opko Health is investigating another siRNA compound directed against VEGF which inhibits the angiogenic VEGFA165 isoform but does not inhibit the VEGFA165b antiangiogenic isoform. These compounds have not yet progressed to human clinical trials.

SIRNA-027 FOR SUBFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION

SIRNA-027 is an siRNA which is directed against VEGF receptor 1 rather than VEGF. It showed promising results in preclinical laboratory studies, reducing CNV in mice.35 SIRNA-027 was evaluated in a human phase I trial which was an open-label, dose escalation study of a single intravitreal injection of SIRNA-027. The primary objectives were to study the safety and tolerability of intravitreal SIRNA-027 as well as detecting if the drug was systemically absorbed. The primary efficacy endpoints were changes in visual acuity and macular thickness by OCT. Patients were eligible for the study if they were 50 years or older with subfoveal CNV from AMD of 12 disc areas or less. Any subretinal blood or scarring had to occupy less than 50% of the lesion. The retinal thickness on OCT had to be greater than 250 m. Visual acuity had to be between 20/100 and 20/800 for inclusion. Patients were excluded from the study if CNV was caused by any other ocular or systemic diseases which could interfere with measurements of the efficacy endpoints. Eyes with any standard or experimental therapy for AMD within 3 months of the study were also excluded.

There were 26 eyes divided into five dose groups in the phase I study. The doses of SIRNA-027 varied between 100 and 1600 g (100, 200, 400, 800, 1200, and 1600 g). The ocular and systemic safety of SIRNA-027 was excellent, with most ocular problems related to irritation from the intravitreal injection. There were no serious adverse ocular events and no systemic toxicities were noted. The mean change in visual acuity through 12 weeks is summarized in Figure 40.6. Visual acuity improved in all dose groups tested but there was a tendency for visual acuity to regress toward baseline by 12 weeks (there was only one intravitreal injection at time 0). The mean visual acuity for all dose groups combined is summarized in Figure 40.7, which shows that visual acuity increased to a mean improvement of 6.3 letters by 2 weeks following injection. There was a tendency for visual acuity to deteriorate, but the

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

letters

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in ETDRS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

change

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Day post injection

100 µg

400 µg

1200 µg

200 µg

800 µg

1600 µg

Figure 40.6  SIRNA-027, a small-interference RNA directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, showed initial mean visual acuity improvements following one intravitreal injection in a dose-ranging study. Visual acuity improvements tended to decrease toward baseline by 80 days following the single injection. The variability in visual acuity results is not surprising since there were only 3–6 eyes in each dose group.

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean/Visit

 

letters

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ETDRS

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

change

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Days post injection

Figure 40.7  The mean visual acuities with SIRNA-027 are plotted, showing the trend toward initial visual acuity improvement by a mean of 6 letters about 2 weeks following injection, followed by decreased vision. There was still a net gain in visual acuity at 80 days.

(microns)

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

thickness

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

foveal

−20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

changes

−60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

−80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean

−100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

 

 

 

100 mg (n=4)

 

400 mg (n=3)

 

1200 mg (n=6)

 

 

 

200 mg (n=3)

 

800 mg (n=6)

 

 

 

 

Figure 40.8  Optical coherence tomography measurements of foveal thickness following intravitreal injection of SIRNA-027 also showed decreases in macular thickness with a trend toward increasing thickness by 80 days following a single injection.

visual acuity had not returned to baseline even by 3 months following injection. Twenty-three percent of eyes gained at least 3 lines or more by 8 weeks following injection and no eyes deteriorated by 3 or more lines. The mean change in foveal thickness by OCT decreased in some groups but not in others, consistent with variability expected in a small sample size of 3–6 eyes per group (Figure 40.8). There was no detectable plasma SIRNA-027, indicating that the drug was not absorbed into the systemic circulation to any measurable degree. Based on the safety data from the phase I study, randomized control studies of SIRNA-027 for neovascular AMD have been conducted by Allergan and Merck. The lack of efficacy and benefits to patients, evaluated through various parameters, has led to discontinuation of further studies with SIRNA-027.

REDD14 NP

REDD14NP is an siRNA that acts via RNA interference to inhibit the expression of the hypoxia-inducible gene, RTP801. Expression of the RTP801 gene is dramatically up-regulated in response to hypoxia and/ or oxidative stress, which leads to the induction of neuronal cell apoptosis. RTP801 is up-regulated in the retina of mice and rats in a model of retinopathy of prematurity, and RTP801 knockout mice exhibited attenuated pathology.36 RTP801 knockout mice also exhibited reduced CNV in a laser-induced model of AMD.

282