Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Pharmacotherapy_Rodrigues, Nguyen, Farah_2010.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
16.55 Mб
Скачать

Acetate chaptecortave• 31 An

Table 31.3  Most frequent ocular adverse events in subjects receiving anecortave acetate as adjunctive therapy

Adverse event

Anecortave acetate

Vehicle + PDT

P

 

15 mg + PDT (n = 45)

(n = 46)

 

All ocular

 

 

 

 

 

Cataract

14 (31.1%)

8 (17.4%)

0.1264

Eye pain

10 (22.2%)

4 (8.7%)

0.0738

Eye hyperemia

9

(20%)

11 (23.9%)

0.6522

Visual acuity decrease

8

(17.8%)

10

(21.7%)

0.6353

Foreign-body sensation

3

(6.7%)

8

(17.4%)

0.1166

Ptosis

3

(6.7%)

1

(2.2%)

0.3610

Eye pruritus

3

(6.7%)

1

(2.2%)

0.3610

Anisocoria

3

(6.7%)

1

(2.2%)

0.3610

IOP decrease

3

(6.7%)

0

(0%)

0.1168

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adapted from data reported in Regillo CD, DAmico DJ, Mieler WF, et al. Clinical safety profile of posterior juxtascleral depot administration of anecortave acetate 15 mg suspension as primary therapy or adjunctive therapy with photodynamic therapy for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S70S78.

PDT, photodynamic therapy; IOP, intraocular pressure.

Table 31.4  Most frequent systemic adverse events in subjects receiving anecortave acetate as primary therapy

Adverse event

Anecortave

PDT (n = 267)

P (15 mg

Vehicle

P (15 mg

 

acetate 15 mg

 

 

versus

(n = 30)

versus

 

(n = 313)

 

 

PDT)

 

 

vehicle)

All systemic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypertension

56

(17.9%)

46

(17.2%)

0.8344

4

(13.3%)

0.5302

Arthritis

31

(9.9%)

22

(8.2%)

0.4881

5

(16.7%)

0.2241

Infection

29

(9.3%)

14

(5.2%)

0.0654

1

(3.3%)

0.4953

Hypercholesterolemia

29

(9.3%)

20

(7.5%)

0.4437

2

(6.7%)

1.0000

Accidental injury

25

(8%)

21

(7.9%)

0.9568

1

(3.3%)

0.7142

Gastrointestinal disorder

25

(8%)

20

(7.5%)

0.8237

3

(10%)

0.7238

Lung disorder

22

(7%)

18

(6.7%)

0.8918

0

(0%)

0.2387

Hyperlipemia

21

(6.7%)

6 (2.2%)

0.0110

1

(3.3%)

0.7069

Depression

20

(6.4%)

19

(7.1%)

0.7277

1

(3.3%)

1.0000

Nausea

19

(6.1%)

16

(6%)

0.9687

2

(6.7%)

0.7041

Diabetes mellitus

19

(6.1%)

14

(5.2%)

0.6683

0

(0%)

0.3921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adapted from data reported in Regillo CD, DAmico DJ, Mieler WF, et al. Clinical safety profile of posterior juxtascleral depot administration of anecortave acetate 15 mg suspension as primary therapy or adjunctive therapy with photodynamic therapy for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S70S78.

PDT, photodynamic therapy.

Based on clinical trial data, frequent systemic adverse events in subjects receiving anecortave acetate as either primary therapy (Table 31.4) or adjunctive therapy (Table 31.5) included hypertension, peripheral edema, arthritis, and depression among others.41 There was no statistically significant difference between subjects receiving the treatment drug and those receiving vehicle with respect to the incidence of any of these systemic adverse events. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

DRUG INTERACTIONS

To date, there have been no reported drug interactions with anecortave acetate.

SUMMARY AND KEY POINTS

Anecortave acetate represents a novel class of steroid compounds, the angiostatic cortisenes, which lack the anti-inflammatory properties and ocular complications associated with glucocorticoids but retain their antiangiogenic effects. Its receptor is not known, and its molecular mechanism of action is only partially understood; however, it appears to regulate the process of neovascularization at multiple levels. It inhibits the production of VEGF and the proliferation of endothelial cells in response to VEGF. It also inhibits the production of extracellular proteinases, which play in important role in the migration of endothelial cells during the angiogenic process.

Studies in preclinical models support the ability of anecortave acetate to inhibit neovascularization in a variety of settings. In clinical

216

Table 31.5  Most frequent systemic adverse events in subjects receiving anecortave acetate as adjunctive therapy

 

Adverse event

Anecortave acetate

Vehicle + PDT (n = 46)

P

 

 

 

15 mg + PDT (n = 45)

 

 

 

 

All systemic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peripheral edema

5

(11.1%)

4

(8.7%)

0.7394

Arthritis

4

(8.9%)

2

(4.3%)

0.4345

Depression

4

(8.9%)

2

(4.3%)

0.4345

Hypertension

3

(6.7%)

1

(2.2%)

0.3610

Alopecia

3

(6.7%)

0

(0%)

0.1168

Bradycardia

3

(6.7%)

0

(0%)

0.1168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adapted from data reported in Regillo CD, DAmico DJ, Mieler WF, et al. Clinical safety profile of posterior juxtascleral depot administration of anecortave acetate 15 mg suspension as primary therapy or adjunctive therapy with photodynamic therapy for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S70S78.

PDT, photodynamic therapy.

trials, it has been shown to reduce vision loss associated with exudative AMD. Although no direct comparison has been made in a clinical trial, anecortave acetate may not be as effective as monthly intra­ vitreal VEGF inhibitors, such as ranibizumab, to treat exudative AMD as monotherapy. Nevertheless, its 6-month dosing interval and the relative safety of the PJD injection procedure make anecortave acetate an appealing potential adjuvant treatment which may augment and prolong the effect of other therapeutic modalities in combined regimens. As more pharmacologic inhibitors of neovascularization emerge in the coming years, the study of combination regimens in the treatment of AMD as well as other ocular diseases in which pathologic angiogenesis plays a role will become increasingly important. An even greater impact, however, will be made in the future by pharmacologic prevention of neovascularization by intervention during the preproliferative stages of disease. The AART trial was testing this theory by evaluating the use of anecortave acetate in patients with high-risk dry AMD to prevent progression to wet AMD, but the delivery may not have been optimal to obtain a positive result and the study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy. As the molecular pathogenesis of these diseases is further elucidated, more emphasis may be placed in the future on arresting the disease process before the onset of vision loss. Finally, other diseases, such as glaucoma, may also benefit from anecortave acetate. Only time will tell.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Dr. Kaiser has received honoraria for serving on Alcon’s Scientific Advisory Board that has been disclosed to the Conflict of Interest Committee of the Cleveland Clinic. The Cole Eye Institute, Dr. Kaiser’s employer, has received research grant support on his behalf from Alcon.

REFERENCES

1.Ciulla TA, Walker JD, Fong DS, et al. Corticosteroids in posterior segment disease: an update on new delivery systems and new indications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:211–220.

2.Gillies MC, Kuzniarz M, Craig J, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone-induced elevated intraocular pressure is associated with the development of posterior subcapsular cataract. Ophthalmology 2005;112:139–143.

3.Ciulla TA, Criswell MH, Danis RP, et al. Squalamine lactate reduces choroidal neovascularization in a laser-injury model in the rat. Retina 2003;23:808–814.

4.Fotsis T, Zhang Y, Pepper MS, et al. The endogenous oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumour growth. Nature 1994;368:237–239.

5.Robinson MR, Baffi J, Yuan P, et al. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravitreal 2-methoxyestradiol implants in normal rabbit and pharmacodynamics in a rat model of choroidal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res 2002;74:309–317.

6.Yamamoto T, Terada N, Nishizawa Y, et al. Angiostatic activities of medroxyprogesterone acetate and its analogues. Int J Cancer 1994;56:393–399.

7.Crum R, Szabo S, Folkman J. A new class of steroids inhibits angiogenesis in the presence of heparin or a heparin fragment. Science 1985;230:1375–1378.

8.Clark AF. Mechanism of action of the angiostatic cortisene anecortave acetate. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S26–S34.

9.McNatt LG, Lane D, Clark AF. Angiostatic activity and metabolism of

cortisol in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the chick embryo. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992;42:687–693.

10.McNatt LG, Weimer L, Yanni J, et al. Angiostatic activity of steroids in the chick embryo CAM and rabbit cornea models of neovascularization. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1999;15:413–423.

11.Clark AF. Preclinical efficacy of anecortave acetate. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S41–S48.

12.BenEzra D, Griffin BW, Maftzir G, et al. Topical formulations of novel angiostatic steroids inhibit rabbit corneal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:1954–1962.

13.Dahlin DC, Rahimy MH. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of anecortave acetate in animals and humans. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S49–S61.

14.Kaiser PK, Goldberg MF, Davis AA. Posterior juxtascleral depot administration of anecortave acetate. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S62–S69.

15.Slakter JS. Anecortave acetate for treating or preventing choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19:373–380.

16.Taylor HR. Pterygium. The Hague, Monroe, NY: Kugler; 2000. p. vi, 181.

17.Penn JS, Rajaratnam VS, Collier RJ, et al. The effect of an angiostatic steroid on neovascularization in a rat model of retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:283–290.

18.Penn JS, Rajaratnam VS. Inhibition of retinal neovascularization by intravitreal injection of human rPAI-1 in a rat model of retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5423–5429.

19.The natural ocular outcome of premature birth and retinopathy. Status at 1 year. Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:903–912.

20.Palmer EA, Flynn JT, Hardy RJ, et al. Incidence and early course of retinopathy of prematurity. The Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1628–1640.

21.Phelps DL, Rosenbaum AL. Vitamin E in kitten oxygen-induced retinopathy. II. Blockage of vitreal neovascularization. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:1522–1526.

22.Folkman J. Angiogenesis inhibitors: a new class of drugs. Cancer Biol Ther 2003;2:S127–S133.

23.Folkman J. A novel anti-vascular therapy for cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2004;3:338–339.

24.Clark AF, Mellon J, Li XY, et al. Inhibition of intraocular tumor growth by topical application of the angiostatic steroid anecortave acetate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2158–2162.

25.Jockovich ME, Murray TG, Escalona-Benz E, et al. Anecortave acetate as single and adjuvant therapy in the treatment of retinal tumors of LH(BETA) T(AG) mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:1264–1268.

26.Bressler NM. Age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness. JAMA 2004;291:1900–1901.

27.Kimura H, Sakamoto T, Hinton DR, et al. A new model of subretinal neovascularization in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:2110–2119.

Diseases Retinal in Mechanisms and Drugs • 4 section

217

Acetate chaptecortave• 31 An

28.Kaiser PK. Antivascular endothelial growth factor agents and their development: therapeutic implications in ocular diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:660–668.

29.D’Amico DJ, Goldberg MF, Hudson H, et al. Anecortave acetate as monotherapy for treatment of subfoveal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: twelve-month clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2372–2383; discussion 2384–2385.

30.Russell SR, Hudson HL, Jerdan JA. Anecortave acetate for the treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration – a review of clinical outcomes. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S79–S90.

31.Slakter JS, Bochow TW, D’Amico DJ, et al. Anecortave acetate (15 milligrams) versus photodynamic therapy for treatment of subfoveal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2006;113:3–13.

32.Klais CM, Eandi CM, Ober MD, et al. Anecortave acetate treatment for retinal angiomatous proliferation: a pilot study. Retina 2006;26:773–779.

33.Eandi CM, Ober MD, Freund KB, et al. Anecortave acetate for the treatment of idiopathic perifoveal telangiectasia: a pilot study. Retina 2006;26:780–785.

34.Bressler NM. Verteporfin therapy in age-related macular degeneration (VAM): an open-label multicenter photodynamic therapy study of 4,435 patients. Retina 2004;24:512–520.

35.Postelmans L, Pasteels B, Coquelet P, et al. Severe pigment epithelial alterations in the treatment area following photodynamic therapy for classic choroidal neovascularization in young females. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:803–808.

36.Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Viestenz A, Naumann GO, et al. Dose-related structural effects of photodynamic therapy on choroidal and retinal structures of human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:748–757.

37.Wachtlin J, Behme T, Heimann H, et al. Concentric retinal pigment epithelium atrophy after a single photodynamic therapy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241:518–521.

38.Rosenfeld PJ, Rich RM, Lalwani GA. Ranibizumab: Phase III clinical trial results. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2006;19:361–372.

39.Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1432–1444.

40.Heaton J, Kastner P, Hackett R. Preclinical safety of anecortave acetate. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S35–S40.

41.Regillo CD, D’Amico DJ, Mieler WF, et al. Clinical safety profile of posterior juxtascleral depot administration of anecortave acetate 15 mg suspension as primary therapy or adjunctive therapy with photodynamic therapy for treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52(Suppl. 1):S70–S78.

42.D’Amico DJ, Goldberg MF, Hudson H, et al. Anecortave acetate as monotherapy for the treatment of subfoveal lesions in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD): interim (month 6) analysis of clinical safety and efficacy. Retina 2003;23:14–23.

218

CHAPTER

32Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and fragments: bevacizumab

Ainat Klein, MD and Anat Loewenstein, MD

KEY FEATURES

Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) has become a frequent target for the treatment of ocular diseases in which angiogenesis plays a role as a result of the growing body of evidence that it is an important regulator of angiogenesis, vascular development and differentiation, and vascular permeability. Several anti-VEGF therapies have become available for clinical use. This chapter will discuss the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody.

INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY

The development of a vascular supply is essential for tissue repair and reproductive functions; thus, normal angiogenesis is vital for proper functioning of the human body. Angiogenesis is also implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of systemic disorders, such as autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis), as well as in tumor growth and metastasis. It is also involved in the pathogenesis of ocular diseases, such as proliferative retinopathies, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and others. Vascularization plays a unique role in the exchange of secretory products between the interstitial fluid surrounding the parenchymal cells and the plasma.1,2

A breakthrough in the understanding of normal and pathological angiogenesis occurred in 1948. Michaelson proposed that the existence of a diffusible angiogenic, “factor X,” produced by the retina is responsible for retinal and iritic neovascularization that occurs in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and other retinal disorders, such as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).3

It took another 20 years until another breakthrough was achieved from a different direction. In 1968, the first experiments to test the hypothesis directly that tumors produce angiogenic factors were performed. Greenblatt and Shubik4 and Ehrmann and Knoth5 demonstrated that transplantation of melanoma cells or choriocarcinoma cells promoted blood vessel proliferation even when a millipore filter was interposed between the tumor and the host, providing evidence that tumor angiogenesis was mediated by diffusible factors produced by the tumor cells. In 1971, Folkman et al.6 proposed that antiangiogenesis may be an effective approach in treating human cancer. Folkman et al.6 initiated the first efforts aimed at isolating a “tumor angiogenesis factor” from human and animal tumors. In 1985, the purification to homogeneity and sequencing of both acidic (aFGF) and basic fibroblast growth factors (bFGF) were reported, and in the subsequent year their cDNAs were cloned. It also became clear that these molecules are not efficiently secreted and are mostly cell-associated.7

Independent and unrelated lines of research converged toward the identification of VEGF. In 1983, Senger et al.8 described the partial purification of a protein capable of inducing vascular leakage in the skin from the conditioned medium of a guinea pig tumor cell line and named the protein “tumor vascular permeability factor” (VPF). The authors proposed that VPF could be a mediator of the high permeability of tumor blood vessels. In a later publication, they reported the purification and NH2-terminal amino acid sequencing of guinea pig VPF.8 In

1989, Ferrara and Henzel reported the isolation of a diffusible endothelial cell-specific mitogen from medium conditioned by bovine pituitary follicular cells, which they named “vascular endothelial growth factor” to reflect the restricted target cell specificity of this molecule. NH2- terminal amino acid sequencing of purified VEGF proved that this protein was distinct from the known endothelial cell mitogens, such as aFGF or bFGF, and that they did not match any known protein in available databases.9 Connolly et al.10 continued the work by Senger et al. and independently reported the isolation and sequencing of human VPF from U937 cells. cDNA cloning of VEGF and VPF, also reported in 1989, demonstrated that VEGF and VPF were the same molecule. The finding that VEGF is potent, diffusible, and specific for vascular endothelial cells led to the hypothesis that this molecule might play a role in the regulation of physiological and pathological growth of blood vessels.11

It emerged that this hypothesis was correct, with VEGF having been proven able to promote growth of vascular endothelial cells derived from arteries, veins, and lymphatics. VEGF is also a survival factor for endothelial cells and prevents endothelial apoptosis. It plays a role in the enhancement of vascular permeability and hemodynamic effects. Although endothelial cells are the primary targets of VEGF, several studies have reported mitogenic effects also on certain nonendothelial cell types, such as retinal pigment epithelial cells, pancreatic duct cells, Schwann cells, alveolar type II cells and other cells. VEGF has the ability to promote monocyte chemotaxis and was reported to have hematopoietic effects, inducing colony formation.7

From the ocular point of view, angiogenesis is a basic and critical part in the pathogenesis of many ocular neovascular syndromes and their complications. VEGF-A is believed to play a significant role in the formation of blood vessels that grow abnormally and leak. These blood vessels are fragile and can bleed, and potentially cause distortion of the retina, leading to deterioration of central vision.

Several strategies to inhibit the action of VEGF have been explored, including neutralizing anti-VEGF antibodies, receptor antagonists, soluble receptors, antagonistic VEGF mutants, inhibitors of VEGF receptor function, and upstream inhibitors of VEGF regulators such as protein kinase C. Bevacizumab (Avastin) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin antibody that inhibits the activity of VEGF (see section on drug mechanism, below). It was designed as antitumor treatment in order to treat advanced carcinoma patients. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) is also a humanized antibody fragment against VEGF which was specifically designed for intraocular use as a smaller antibody fragment to penetrate through the retina better. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ranibizumab for treatment of subfoveal neovascular AMD in June, 2006. It was the first treatment for AMD shown to improve visual acuity (VA) in a substantial percentage of patients as opposed to slowing visual loss. A number of prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have proven its efficacy in treating minimally classic or occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD12 as well as predominantly classic CNV.13 Bevacizumab has a similar action and is related to the ranibizumab compound with respect to its structure. Bevacizumab was first approved by the FDA for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in 2004, but it has not gained approval for intravitreal use. It has, however, recently been reported to treat patients successfully with a number of ocular diseases with off-label use.

219