Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Degeneration Disease_Hollyfield, Anderson, LaVail_1999
.pdf19. TRANSDUCIN TRANSLOCATION IN G90D RETINA |
131 |
Sieving, P.A., Richards, J.E., Naarendorp, F., Bingham, E.L., Scott, K., and Alpern, M., 1995, Dark-light: model for nightblindness from the human rhodopsin Gly-90–>Asp mutation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:880884.
Tan, E., Wang, Q., Quiambao, A.B., Xu, X., Qtaishat, N.M., Peachey, N.S. et al., 2001, The relationship between opsin overexpression and photoreceptor degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42:589-600.
Whelan, J.P. and McGinnis, J.F. (1988) Light-dependent subcellular movement of photoreceptor proteins. J. Neurosci. Res. 20:263-270.
Zhang, H., Huang, W., Zhang, H., Zhu, X., Craft, C.M., Baehr, W., and Chen, C.K., 2003, Light-dependent redistribution of visual arrestins and transducin subunits in mice with defective phototransduction. Mol. Vis. 9:231237.
CHAPTER 20
SLOWED PHOTORESPONSE RECOVERY AND AGE-RELATED DEGENERATION IN CONES LACKING G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 1
Xuemei Zhu, Bruce Brown, Lawrence Rife, and Cheryl M. Craft*
1. INTRODUCTION
The vertebrate retina is a specialized neural network that contains very sensitive signal transducers—the rod and cone photoreceptors. Rods function in near darkness (scotopic) and are responsible for dim light vision, while cones operate in bright light (photopic) and provide daytime, high acuity color vision. In the human retina, rods are the dominant photoreceptor cell type and comprise about 95% of all photoreceptor cells, while cones account for only 5% of the cells. Yet in a bright light environment, normal cone function is essential for visual perception since rods become saturated and are rendered nonfunctional.
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are two major causes of visual loss due to photoreceptor degeneration. In RP, rod degeneration results in night blindness and loss of peripheral vision. Inevitably, cones are also lost following the disappearance of rods through currently unknown mechanisms, resulting in blindness.1 AMD is the leading cause of visual impairment and legal blindness in elderly people in the Western world.2 In AMD, central vision is compromised initially, and although rod cell death occurs prior to cone loss, it is the subsequent cone cell death that eventually leads to complete visual loss.3-5 During the last decade, significant advances have been made in understanding the mechanisms leading to rod cell death; however, those underlying cone loss are still poorly delineated. This is due to the paucity of cones in the mammalian retina that makes the study of cone function and disease-related processes difficult.
The neural retinal leucine zipper (Nrl ) knockout (KO, -/-) mouse has a pure-cone retina due to a cell fate switch from rod to S cone during retinal development.6 ERG analysis of Nrl-/- mice reveals that the amplitude of light-adapted ERG responses elicited by maximum stimulus does not change significantly up to 31 weeks of age, suggesting the cones in these
* Xuemei Zhu, Bruce Brown, Lawrence Rife and Cheryl M. Craft, the Mary D. Allen Laboratory for Vision Research, Doheny Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Cell & Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 90033-9224.
133
134 |
X. ZHU ET AL. |
mouse retinas survive without rod function.6 In this study, we describe an age-dependent retinal degeneration in the pure-cone Nrl-/- mice lacking G protein-coupled receptor kinase 1 (GRK1). The Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice may provide a useful model for studying the molecular mechanisms of cone cell death in AMD and other retinal diseases.
2. METHODS
2.1. Animals
Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice were generated by crossing the Nrl-/- mice6 with the Grk1-/- mice7 as described previously.8 The Nrl-/- were generously provided by Anand Swaroop and Alan Mears (University of Michigan), and the Grk1-/- mice were provided by Jason Chen (University of Utah). Both the Nrl-/- and the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice were born and maintained in total darkness. All animals were treated according to the guidelines established by the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research.
2.2. Immunoblot Analysis
Three mice from each genotype and each age group were killed at mid-day under room light. From each animal, the retina was dissected from one eye, and the other eye was fixed for histological and immunohistochemistry analysis (data not shown). The retinas were flash frozen on dry ice and kept at -80°C until use. Retinas were homogenized, and an equal amount of proteins from each retina was resolved on replicate 11.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The blots were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against mouse cone arrestin (mCAR),9 S or M opsin8 followed by a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody and visualized by an Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).10
2.3. Electroretinography (ERG)
ERGs were recorded as previously described.11 Mice were dark-adapted overnight, and their eyes were dilated with topical administration of phenylephrine (2.5%) and tropicamide (0.5%). Mice were anesthetized via an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine HCl (100 mg/kg) and xylazine HCl (10 mg/kg), and the cornea anesthetized with 0.5% tropical tetracaine. The mouse was placed in an aluminum foil-lined Faraday cage and a DLT fiber electrode placed on the right cornea. A platinum reference electrode was placed on the lower eyelid and another ground electrode on the epsilateral ear. Photic stimuli of 10-ms duration were delivered through one arm of a coaxial cable using a Grass PS22 xenon flash. The cable delivered the flash 5 mm from the surface of the cornea, and flashes were attenuated with neutral density filters held to a window of fixed f-stop. Dark-adapted maximum responses (mesopic ERG) were measured using the non-attenuated light stimulus (100). Photopic ERGs were measured using the same stimulus with a 6-foot candle (fc) white background light delivered through the other arm of the coaxial cable. The half-amplitude bandwidth of the system was 0.01-100 Hz. Responses were recorded on a Coopervision/Nicolet Electrovisual Diagnostic System, and amplified potentials were displayed on a storage oscilloscope for viewing and photographic recording.
20. CONE DEGENERATION IN GRK1-DEFICIENT MICE |
135 |
3. RESULTS
3.1. Delayed Photoresponse Recovery in Nrl-/-Grk1-/- Mice
In recently completed work, we have demonstrated that GRK1 is responsible for lightdependent phosphorylation of both S and M cone opsins in the mouse retina.8 To evaluate the effect of GRK1 deletion on phototransduction in cones, we recorded ERGs from Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice.
As shown in Figure 20.1A, neither Nrl-/- nor Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice had any ERG response to low intensity light stimulation, which caused a strong rod response in WT mouse, consistent with the pure-cone phenotype of the Nrl-/- mouse.6 Strong ERG responses were elicited in both Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice with high intensity light (Figure 20.1B). Interestingly, the amplitude of the b-wave was reduced by approximately 50% with a 6-fc white background light (6-fc bgd) in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse, compared to that of the Nrl-/- mouse whose b-wave amplitude was not significantly affected by the background light (Figure 20.1B & C).
We also investigated the time course of recovery of dark-adapted ERGs in Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice. Paired-flash ERG responses of dark-adapted mice were recorded using high intensity (100) white flashes at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) specified in seconds (s) to the left of the traces (Figure 20.2). Complete recovery of the ERG responses in the Nrl-/- mice was achieved in about 0.625 sec, but for the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice, the ERG responses were not totally recovered even after 5 sec, suggesting a delayed recovery of cone responses in
Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice.
3.2. Age-Dependent Cone Degeneration in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- Mouse Retina
Morphological studies showed that the outer nuclear layer (photoreceptor layer) of the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice was significantly thinner than that of the age-matched Nrl-/- mice, and was progressively thinner with advancing age, suggesting an age-dependent photoreceptor degeneration in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina (X. Zhu et al., in preparation). ERG analyses of retinal function of mice reared in total darkness revealed that the b-wave amplitude of
A |
B |
|
|
Dark-adapted ERG |
Light-adapted ERG |
|
|
(6-fc bgd) |
|
134 mV |
244 mV |
|
|
|
|
100 ms |
100 ms |
|
|
|
|
WT |
Nrl-/- |
|
|
|
|
Nrl-/- |
|
|
Nrl-/- |
Nrl-/- |
|
Grk1-/- |
|
|
Grk1-/- |
|
|
|
C
1000 |
|
Dark |
|
(uV) |
|
6 fc bgd |
|
|
|
Response |
750 |
|
500 |
|
|
wave-b |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Nrl-/- |
Nrl-/-Grk1-/- |
Figure 20.1. Electroretinography. A. Dark-adapted ERG responses with low stimulus intensity (10-3) from WT, Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk-/- mice. B. Darkand light-adapted ERGs with high stimulus intensity (100) from Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice. C. Graph representation of the b-wave amplitude from ERG recordings of Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice. The data represent mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) of six mice of each genotype.
136
Nrl -/- |
Nrl -/- Grk1 -/- |
Control |
Control |
|S| (s) |
|S| (s) |
0.8 |
5.0 |
|
|
0.625 |
2.5 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
0.33 |
0.625 |
0.2 |
244 mV |
|
100 ms
X. ZHU ET AL.
Figure 20.2. Recovery of ERG responses after a conditioning flash in Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice. A high intensity white flash was delivered after a conditioning flash at the same intensity at inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) specified in seconds (s) to the left of the traces. Responses obtained without the preceding conditioning flashes are marked as controls.
V) |
1500 |
|
|
|
|
(m |
|
|
|
|
|
amplitude |
1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-wave |
500 |
Nrl-/- |
|
|
|
|
Nrl-/-Grk1-/- |
|
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
Age of mice (months)
Figure 20.3. Maximum b-wave amplitude of dark-adapted ERG responses in Nrl-/- and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice.
mesopic ERGs decreased rapidly with increasing age in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice, while that of the Nrl-/- mice remained unchanged up to 9 months of age (Figure 20.3). Animals reared in either 12 : 12 hr cyclic light or bright constant light had similar ERG b-wave amplitude to those of the same genotype raised in total darkness (X. Zhu et al., in preparation), suggesting that the functional decrease and degeneration of the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- photoreceptors are dependent on age but independent of light under these conditions, in contrast to the lightinduced rod degeneration in the Grk1-/- mouse retina.7
20. CONE DEGENERATION IN GRK1-DEFICIENT MICE |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
||||||||
A Age |
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
B Age |
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
|
(month) |
(month) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
mCAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mCAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M opsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M opsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S opsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S opsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
(percent |
value) |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Protein level |
of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
mCAR |
|
|
|
|
||
25 |
M Opsin |
|
|
|
|||
S Opsin |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
Age (months)
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent |
Value) |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Protein Level |
of 1 Month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
mCAR |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
25 |
M Opsin |
|
|
|
|
||
0 |
S Opsin |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
Age (months)
Figure 20.4. Immunoblot analysis of mCAR, S and M Opsins. Nrl-/- (A) and Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mice (B) reared in total darkness were killed, and one retina was dissected and frozen. Frozen retinas were homogenized and equal amounts of proteins were applied to an SDS-PAGE. In each panel, a representative immunoblot and a histogram representing quantitative data (Mean ± SEM) from 3 immunoblots are shown per age group.
3.3. Both S and M Cones Die with Age in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- Mouse Retina
To determine if both S and M cones degenerate in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina, we determined protein expression levels by immunoblot analyses for S and M opsins, as well as for mCAR, which is expressed in all cones.8,9 The expression levels of all three photoreceptor-specific proteins decrease dramatically with age in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina but do not change significantly in the Nrl-/- mouse retina up to 11 months of age (Figure 20.4). These results suggest that both S and M cones degenerate with age in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina.
4. DISCUSSION
Morphological and biochemical analysis of the Nrl-/- retina suggest a complete lack of rods and increased number of S cones.6 Single cell recordings reveal that the Nrl-/- photoreceptors have similar responses to the cones of the rhodopsin-/- mice,12,13 which are used as a pure cone animal model for studying cone function.14 Therefore, the photoreceptors of the Nrl-/- mouse retina are functionally and biochemically cones.
In biochemical experiments utilizing these pure-cone retinas, we have found that both S and M opsins are phosphorylated following light exposure, and that cone arrestin preferentially binds to light-activated, phosphorylated cone opsins, suggesting that cones in the Nrl-/- mouse retina may have a similar signal shutoff pathway to that of the wildtype mouse rods.8
138 |
X. ZHU ET AL. |
GRK1 is expressed in all rods and cones in the retina of rod-dominant human, monkey and mouse8,15-17 and of cone-dominant chicken.18 GRK1 phosphorylation of light-activated rhodopsin is required for normal inactivation of rhodopsin in vivo.7,19 Although a conespecific GRK (GRK7) exists in other species,16,20-22, GRK1 is the only opsin kinase found in the mouse retina16,22,23 and is responsible for light-dependent phosphorylation of both S and M cone opsins.8 ERG analysis of cone photoresponses of the Grk1-/- mouse retina reveals that GRK1 plays a critical role in the inactivation of murine cone phototransduction.17 In the studies presented here, we demonstrate that when the Grk1 gene is simultaneously knocked out in the Nrl-/- mice, the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- animals have delayed photoresponse recovery, and their retinal function decreases dramatically with age, indicating that lack of GRK1 function in cones can lead to cone cell degeneration, in addition to the delayed photoreseponse recovery reported previously.17
In another study using single cell recordings of the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- photoreceptors, Pugh and collaborators have confirmed the critical role of GRK1 in cone phototransduction shutoff and have shown that the shutoff of M opsin is more dramatically delayed than that of S opsin in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- retina.24 These results suggest a potential alternative shutoff pathway for S opsin in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina. Our biochemical experiments show that both S and M opsins decrease with age, but the S opsin decrease appears to be slower than that of M opsin in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- retina (X. Zhu et al., in preparation). Further immunohistochemistry studies are needed to determine if M cones die earlier or faster than S cones in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina. Because the cone cell degeneration in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina is light-independent, we postulate that GRK1 may play other roles that are related to regulation of cellular proliferation and/or apoptosis in cone photoreceptors of the mouse retina. Experiments are underway to define the molecular mechanisms leading to cone cell death in the Nrl-/-Grk1-/- mouse retina. We believe that these mice will provide a valuable model for studying the molecular pathways of cone photoreceptor degeneration and for testing preventive and therapeutic strategies for rescuing cone function, thus preserving vision, in various retinal degenerative diseases.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Mary D. Allen for over a decade of generous support to our vision research program. CMC is the Mary D. Allen Chair in Vision Research, Doheny Eye Institute (DEI). These studies were also supported, in part, from the NEI Core Vision Research Center grant EY03040 (DEI), the Tony Gray Foundation and Dorie and Fred Miller. The authors also wish to thank Drs. Alan Mears and Anand Swaroop for providing the Nrl-/- mice and Dr. Ching-Kang Jason Chen for the Grk1-/- mice.
6.REFERENCES
1.Hicks D, Sahel J. The implications of rod-dependent cone survival for basic and clinical research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:3071-3074.
2.Klein R, Klein BE, Linton KL. Prevalence of age-related maculopathy. The Beaver Dam Eye Study.
Ophthalmology. 1992;99:933-943.
3.Curcio CA, Millican CL, Allen KA, Kalina RE. Aging of the human photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of rods in central retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3278-3296.
20. CONE DEGENERATION IN GRK1-DEFICIENT MICE |
139 |
4.Curcio CA. Photoreceptor topography in ageing and age-related maculopathy. Eye. 2001;15:376-383.
5.Reme CE, Grimm C, Hafezi F, Iseli HP, Wenzel A. Why study rod cell death in retinal degenerations and how?
Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;106:25-29.
6.Mears AJ, Kondo M, Swain PK, et al. Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development. Nat Genet. 2001;29:447-452.
7.Chen CK, Burns ME, Spencer M, et al. Abnormal photoresponses and light-induced apoptosis in rods lacking rhodopsin kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3718-3722.
8.Zhu X, Brown B, Li A, et al. GRK1-dependent phosphorylation of S and M opsins and their binding to cone arrestin during cone phototransduction in the mouse retina. J Neurosci. 2003;23:6152-6160.
9.Zhu X, Li A, Brown B, et al. Mouse cone arrestin expression pattern: light induced translocation in cone photoreceptors. Mol Vis. 2002;8:462-471.
10.Zhu X, Craft CM. Modulation of CRX transactivation activity by phosducin isoforms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:5216-5226.
11.Chen P, Hao W, Rife L, et al. A photic visual cycle of rhodopsin regeneration is dependent on Rgr. Nat Genet. 2001;28:256-260.
12.Nikonov SS, Daniele LL, Mears AJ, Swaroop A, Pugh EN. Functional properties of photocurrents of single photoreceptors of the Nrl-/- mouse. ARVO Abstract. 2003;
13.Nikonov SS, Daniele L, Zhu X, et al. Photoreceptors of the Nrl knockout mouse: Are they cones. The eighth Annual Vision Research Conference. 2004;Abstract:
14.Jaissle GB, May CA, Reinhard J, et al. Evaluation of the rhodopsin knockout mouse as a model of pure cone function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:506-513.
15.Zhao X, Huang J, Khani SC, Palczewski K. Molecular forms of human rhodopsin kinase (GRK1). J Biol Chem. 1998;273:5124-5131.
16.Weiss ER, Ducceschi MH, Horner TJ, et al. Species-specific differences in expression of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 7 and GRK1 in mammalian cone photoreceptor cells: implications for cone cell phototransduction. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9175-9184.
17.Lyubarsky AL, Chen C, Simon MI, Pugh EN, Jr. Mice lacking G-protein receptor kinase 1 have profoundly slowed recovery of cone-driven retinal responses. J Neurosci. 2000;20:2209-2217.
18.Zhao X, Yokoyama K, Whitten ME, et al. A novel form of rhodopsin kinase from chicken retina and pineal gland. FEBS Lett. 1999;454:115-121.
19.Chen J, Makino CL, Peachey NS, Baylor DA, Simon MI. Mechanisms of rhodopsin inactivation in vivo as revealed by a COOH-terminal truncation mutant. Science. 1995;267:374-377.
20.Hisatomi O, Matsuda S, Satoh T, et al. A novel subtype of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase, GRK7, in teleost cone photoreceptors. FEBS Lett. 1998;424:159-164.
21.Weiss ER, Raman D, Shirakawa S, et al. The cloning of GRK7, a candidate cone opsin kinase, from coneand rod-dominant mammalian retinas. Mol Vis. 1998;4:27.
22.Chen CK, Zhang K, Church-Kopish J, et al. Characterization of human GRK7 as a potential cone opsin kinase. Mol Vis. 2001;7:305-313.
23.Caenepeel S, Charydczak G, Sudarsanam S, Hunter T, Manning G. The mouse kinome: discovery and comparative genomics of all mouse protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11707-11712.
24.Nikonov SS, Daniele L, Zhu X, et al. Photorecptors of Nrl-/- mice co-express functional S- and M-opsins having distinct inactivation mechanisms. J Gen Physiol. 2005; In Press.
CHAPTER 21
TRANSGENIC ANIMAL STUDIES OF
HUMAN RETINAL DISEASE CAUSED BY
MUTATIONS IN PERIPHERIN/RDS
Xi-Qin Ding and Muna I. Naash1
1. INTRODUCTION
The photoreceptor disk membrane protein peripherin/rds is essential for the outer segment morphogenesis and integrity. Peripherin/rds associates with itself and with its homologue Rom-1 to form homoand hetero-complexes, which are necessary for its structural role (Goldberg et al., 1995; Molday, 1998). More than seventy different pathogenic mutations in the peripherin/rds gene have been identified. These mutations are divided primarily into two categories: those associated with classic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and those associated with various forms of macular dystrophy (MD). In fact, mutations in peripherin/rds account for 5-10% of RP causes, and is a major cause for MD (Kohl et al., 1998; Molday, 1998; http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/RetNet; http://www.retina-international.org/sci- news/rdsmut.htm). Insights into the functional significance, structural role, and pathogenic effects of this protein have been accumulating considerably since its initial description; this is largely accomplished by the use of laboratory animal models. Use of transgenic or knockout animals holds great potential for the investigation of retinal disease pathogenesis and the exploration of therapeutic interventions. Table 21.1 summarizes the animal models used to investigate the disease-causing mutations in peripherin/rds. In addition to the pathogenesis study, transgenic mouse and Xenopus laevis expressing the wild type peripherin/rds or the C-terminus have also been used to explore the structural and functional significance of the protein (Loewen et al., 2003; Ritter et al., 2004).
1 Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 940 Stanton L. Young Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, U.S.A. Corresponding author Muna I. Naash, E-mail muna-naash@ouhsc.edu.
141
142 |
X.-Q. DING AND M.I. NAASH |
Table 21.1. Transgenic animal models of retinal diseases caused by mutations in peripherin/rds.
|
|
|
Pathogenesis of |
|
Mutations and |
|
Phenotype in the |
Retinal |
|
Diseases |
Animal Models |
Animals |
Degeneration |
References |
|
|
|
|
|
L185P/Rom-1 |
Transgenic mice |
Rod degeneration |
Haploinsufficiency |
Kedzierski et al., |
null (RP) |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
Transgenic |
Aggregated in the |
|
Loewen et al., 2003 |
|
Xenopus |
inner segment |
|
|
C214S (RP) |
Transgenic mice |
Rod degeneration |
Haploinsufficiency |
Stricker et al., 2003 |
|
Transgenic |
Aggregated in the |
|
Loewen et al., 2003 |
|
Xenopus |
inner segment |
|
|
P216L (RP) |
Transgenic mice |
Rod degeneration |
Dominant negative effect |
Kedzierski et al., |
|
|
|
|
1997 |
|
Transgenic |
Rod degeneration |
Haploinsufficiency |
Loewen et al., 2003 |
|
Xenopus |
|
|
|
307del (RP) |
Target-deleting |
Rod degeneration |
Dominant negative effect |
McNally et al., 2002 |
|
mice |
|
Haploinsufficiency |
|
R172W (MD) |
Transgenic mice |
Cone-dominant |
Dominant negative |
Li et al., 1999; Ding |
|
|
degeneration |
effect |
et al., 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
2. TRANSGENIC ANIMAL MODELS OF RP CAUSED BY MUTATION IN PERIPHERIN/RDS
The majority of the RP-causing mutations in peripherin/rds exerts a dominant effect such as the P216L (Kajiwara et al., 1991) and C214S mutations (Saga et al., 1993); a few fall into the digenic group for example the double heterozygous for a L185P mutation in peripherin/rds and a second null mutation in Rom-1 (Dryja et al., 1997). In the first transgenic mouse model for peripherin/rds mutation-linked autosomal dominant RP, Kedzierski et al., (1997) described an expression-level-dependent photoreceptor degeneration and outer segment shortening in the P216L transgenic mice. Expression of the P216L transgene on the rds+/- and rds-/- background resulted in a faster rate of photoreceptor degeneration and outer segment dysplasia than that seen in the non-transgenic controls. Thus, the phenotype seen in P216L retina is caused by both direct dominant effect of the mutant protein and a consequence of haploinsufficiency. In the study by Stricker et al., (2003), the pathogenesis of the C214S mutation was examined in several transgenic lines with different expression levels of the transgene. Although, comparable amount of transgene message was formed in the transgenic retinas, only a very small amount of the C214S protein was detected. Moreover, ectopic expression of the C214S mutant protein was observed in the inner retinal cells of transgenic mice (Stricker et al., 2003) . The phenotype of photoreceptor degeneration seen in these transgenic mice resembles the symptom in patients with the same mutation. Thus, the haploinsufficiency resulted from the fatal mutation contributes to the retinopathy caused by the C214S mutation.
In a digenic RP mouse model (Kedzierski et al., 2001), in which both the L185P mutation and levels of peripherin/rds and Rom-1 closely matched those predicted for the corresponding human diseases, photoreceptor degeneration in these mice was shown to be faster than that in the monogenic controls. From this model, it was proposed that deficiency of
