Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal and Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery_Boyd, Cortez, Sabates_2010
.pdf
Controlling the local biological environment has already been translated into therapeutic application,114,115,116,117,118,119,120 but the potential of interfering with the biological equilibrium in a clinical setting is as yet not predictable. Therefore, the way to their clinical application may as yet be long. Targeting chronic ischemia has not systematically been addressed but ascorbic acid has been applied in physiological concentrations in vitro in order to re-constitute the environmental situation in the vitreous after retinal detachment.121 More recently, evidence has been reported that statins may have therapeutic potential in the prevention of posterior vitreal detachment and inhibit the progression of PVR.122,123 Further work will thus have to go on in search of the optimal adjunctive treatment, which may be a combination treatment for the management of PVR.63,124,125
With respect to adjunctive treatment, selection of the cases that would benefit from such treatment has remained an unsolved problem.125 The evolution of drug delivery systems may carry a currently not predictable beneficial potential in the next future for successful prevention of proliferation and reproliferation after surgery for PVR,58,5 but its clinical suitability namely in the combination with the different tamponades has as yet not been assessed.
Inconclusion,basingoncurrentknowledge, preventive strategies remain a keystone for success, beyond these in the first place surgical experience126 and strategies to minimize surgical trauma.69,20
ProliferativeVitreoretinopathy
433
Summary and Perspective
The anatomical success after treatment of PVR has improved remarkably within the last decades, namely with introduction of vitrectomy and the use of silicone oil tamponade, which contrasts with a sometimes surprisingly poor functional outcome. This may be related to the induction of biological cicatrising and remodelling processes in consequence of separation of the neuroretina from the retinal pigment epithelium, which may proceed even after successful reattachment of the retina. Therefore a more profound pathophysiological understanding of the biological and biochemical processes involved and a preoperative recognition of cases at risk has to be reinforced in order to allow selection of eyes which take advantage from a primary prophylaxis of PVR at the time of or prior to retinal reattachment surgery. In cases where the development of PVR cannot be prevented successfully, a sustained drug delivery and the introduction of therapies influencing the biological cicatrising process carries promising potential and may realistically be expected within the next 5 to 10 years. Technical evolution has grown to such a high level that the keystone of technical success nowadays is surgical experience, but microrobotic systems to remove existing vitreoretinal adhesions and epiretinal membranes and apply drugs are under development,127,128 which may further improve the anatomical outcomes. After introduction of chromovitrectomy129 including the use of triamcinolone to improve the visualisation of residual
Retinal andVitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
434
vitreous cortex and epiretinal membranes,130 the next step to improve the completeness of vitrectomy, which is a hallmark of surgical success, may be achieved by enzymatic vitreolysis, which is already on a good way and close to routine clinical application.131 A reconstitution of the properties of the vitreoretinal environment, namely a rebalancing of cytokines and growth factors after occurrence of retinal redetachment may be an option at the horizon of preventive strategies. A better understanding of the factors controlling PVR and visual outcome will remain important fields of clinical research in PVR.
References
1.Rachal WF, Burton TC. Changing concepts of failures after retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 480-483
2.Wolfensberger TJ. Jules Gonin. Pioneer of retinal detachment surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003; 51: 303-308
3.Asaria RH, Gregor ZJ. Simple retinal detachments: identifying the at-risk case. Eye 2002; 16: 404-410
4.Kirchhof B. Strategies to influence PVR development. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthol 2004; 242: 699-703
5.Charteris DG et al. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy– developments in adjunctive treatment and retinal pathology. Eye 2002; 4: 369-74
6.Steinberg RH, Wood I. Pigmentepithelial cell ensheathment of cone outer segments in the retina of the domestic cat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1974; 187: 461-78
7.Yamana T et al. The process of closure of experimental holes in rabbit eyes. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238: 81-87
8.Guerin CJ et al. Retinal reattachment of the primate macula. Photoreceptor recovery after short-term detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989; 30: 1708-1725
9.Kauffmann DJ et al. Cytokines in vitreous humor: interleukin-6 is elevated in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 900-906
10.Limb GA et al. Cytokines in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Eye 1991; 5: 686-693
11.Kosnosky W et al. Interleukin-1-beta changes the expression of metalloproteinases in the vitreous humor and induces membrane formation in eyes containing pre-existing retinal holes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 4260-4267
12.Glaser BM, Lemor M. Pathophysiology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. In: Ryan SJ (ed.): Retina 2nd edition, St. Louis, CV Mosby 1974; 2249-63
13.Ryan SJ. The pathophysiology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and its management. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100: 188-193
14.Machemer R. Pathogenesis in classification of massive periretinal proliferation. Br J Ophthalmol 1978;
62:737-747
15.The Retina Society Terminology Committee. The classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 121-125
16.Machemer R et al. An updated classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112: 159-165
17.Lean JS et al. The silicone study group. Classification of proliferative vitreoretinopathy used in the silicone study. Ophthalmology 1989; 1996:756–71
18.Cowly M et al. Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 1147-51
19.Charteris DG. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: pathobiology, surgical management and adjunctive treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 953-60
20.Pastor JC, de la Rúa ER, Martín F. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: risk factors and pathobiology. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002; 21: 127-144.
21.Ryan SJ. Traction retinal detachment. XLIX Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115:1-1120
22.Wickham L et al. Histological analysis of retinas sampled during translocation surgery: a comparison with normal and transplantation retinas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93: 969-973
ProliferativeVitreoretinopathy
435
23.Constable IJ et ad. Clinico-pathologic correlation of vitreous membranes. In: Pruett RD, Regan DJ (eds.) Retinal congress New York 1974; 254-257
24.Laqua H, Machemer R. Clinical-pathological correlation in massive periretinal proliferation. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80: 913-29
25.Machemer R, Laqua H. Pigment epithelium proliferation in retinal detachment (massive periretinal proliferation). Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80: 1-23
26.Hiscott P et al. Cellular components of separate membranes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Eye 1989; 3: 606-10
35.Scott JD. Pathogenesis of PVR with analysis of events leading to recurrent retinal detachment. In: Heimann K, Wiedemann P (eds.) Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Kaden Inc., Heidelberg, Germany 1998; 150-3
36.Miller B et al. Retinal woundhealing. Cellular activity at the vitreoretinal interface. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104: 281-285
37.Lazarus HS et al. Histochemical evidence for vitreous hyalocytes as components of pathological vitreous membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33(Suppl.) 58
27.Guidry C. The role of Müller cells in fibrocontrac38. Charteris DG et al. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
tive retinal disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005; 24: 75-86.
28.Sethi CS et al. Neuronal plasticity in complicated clinical and experimental retinal detachment (RD). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: S445, Abstract 2401
29.Heidenkummer HP et al. Comparative immunohistochemical studies of epiretinal membranes in proliferative vitreoretinal diseases. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1991; 88: 219-224
30.Heidenkummer HP et al. Recurrent vitreoretinal membranes in intravitreal silicon oil tamponade. Morphologic and immunohistochemical studies. Ophthalmologe 1996; 93: 121-125
31.Hiscott P et al. Pathobiology of epiretinal and subretinal membranes: possible roles for the matricellular proteins thrombospondin 1 and osteonectin (SPARC). Eye 2002; 4: 393-403
32.Weller M et al. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy - is it anything more than wound healing at the wrong place? Int Ophthalmol 1990; 14: 105-117
33.Wiedemann P. Growth factors in retinal diseases: proliferative vitreoretinopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy and retinal degeneration. Surv. Ophthalmol 1992; 36: 373-384
34.Koerner F et al. Postoperative retinal fibrosis - a controlled clinical study of systemic steroid therapy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1982; 219: 268271
Lymphocytes in epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 1364-79
39.Charteris DG et al. Inflammatory cells in proliferative vitreoretinopathy subretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 1993; 100:43-6
40.Wiedemann P, Weller M. The pathophysiology of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 189 (Suppl.): 3-15
41.Baudouin C, Gastaud P. Vitreoretinal proliferation. II. Pathogenic hypotheses. J Fr Ophthalmol 1994; 17: 800-811
42.Sheridan CM, Magee RM, Hiscott PS, Hagan S, Wong DH, McGalliard JN, Grierson I.The role of matricellular proteins thrombospondin-1 and osteonectin during RPE cell migration in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Curr Eye Res. 2002; 25: 279-285.
43a. Bartbury MJ et al. Pathogenic mechanisms of retinal detachment. In: Ryan SJ, Wilcinson CP (eds.) Retina. Mosby, St. Louis 2001; 1987-93
43b. Curtin VT et al. Comparative histopathology of cryosurgery and photocoagulation. Observations and advantages of cryosurgery in retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1966; 75: 6574-82
44.Glaser BM et al. Cryotherapy during surgery for giant retinal tears and intravitreal disposal of variable retinal pigment epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 1993; 100: 466-70
Retinal andVitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
436
45.Koerner F et al. [Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: relation to the extent of retinal detachment, size of retinal tears and coagulation surface]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1988; 192: 465-7
46.Comer MB et al. Who should manage primary retinal detachments? Eye 2000; 14: 572-578
47.GlaserBM.Surgeryforproliferativevitreoretinopathy. In: Ryan SJ (ed.) Retina. Second edition, St. Louis, CV Mosby 1994; 2265-80
48.Lim AK, Alexander SM, Lim KS. Combined large radial retinotomy and circumferential retinectomy in the management of advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 2009; 29: 112-116.
49.Abrams G, Glazer L. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. In: Freemann W (ed.) Practical atlas of retinal disease and therapy. Raven Press, New York 1993; 279-97
50.Bonnet M. Clinical findings associated with the development of postoperative PVR in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In: Heimann K, Wiedemann P (eds.). Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Kaden, Heidelberg, 1989; 8-20
51.Yeung L et al. Association between severity of vitreous haemorrhage and visual outcome in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol 2008; 86: 165-169
52.Girard P et al. Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Retina 1994; 14: 417-24
53.Bonnet M. Clinical factors predisposing to massive proliferative vitreoretinopathy in rhegmatogeous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 1984; 188: 148-152
54.Bonnet M, Guenoun S. Surgical risk factors for severe postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in retinal detachment with great B PVR. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995; 233: 789-791
55.Nagasaki H et al. Risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res 1998; 17: 77-98
56.Broekhuyse RM et al. Autoimmune responsiveness to retinal IRBP, S-antigen and opsin in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Exp Eye Res 1990; 50:197-202
57.Chandler DB et al. Improvement in efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in an animal model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy by pretreatment. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1987; 225: 259-65
58.Berger AS et al. Intravitreal sustained release corticosteroid-5-fluoruracil conjugate in the treatment of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 2318-2325
59.Ahmadieh H et al. Triamcinolone acetonide in silicone-filled eyes as adjunctive treatment for proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1938-1943
60.Campochiaro PA et al. Serum contains chemoattractants for humoretinal epithelial cells. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102:1803-3
61.Yang CH, Cousins S. Quantitative assessment of growth stimulating activity of the vitreous during PVR. Invest Ophthalmol Vi Sci 1992; 33: 2436-2442
62.Tseng W et al. Prevalence and risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 1105-1115
63.Charteris DG, Aylward GW, Wong D, Groenewald C, Asaria RH, Bunce C; PVR Study Group. A randomized controlled trial of combined 5-fluorouracil and low-molecular-weight heparin in management of established proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111: 2240-2245.
64.Bonnet M et al. Has the incidence of postoperative PVR and rhegmatogeous retinal detachment decreased? J Fr Ophthal 1996; 19: 696-704
65.James M et al. The prognostic influence of chronicity of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment on anatomic success after reattachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 1032-1034
66.Mietz H, Heimann K. Onset and recurrence of proliferativevitreoretinopathyinvariousvitreoretinal diseases. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79: 874-877
ProliferativeVitreoretinopathy
437
67.Foster RE, Meyers SM. Recurrent retinal detachment more than 1 year after reattachment. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1821-1827
68.Roldán-Pallarés M et al. Preoperative duration of retinal detachment and preoperative central artery hemodynamics: repercussion on visual acuity. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 247: 626-631
69.Pastor JC. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: An overview. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 43: 3-18
70.Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG, Feuer WJ; Perfluoron study group. Outcomes of surgery for retinal detachment associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy using perfluoro-n-octane: a multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136: 454-463.
71.Alexander P et al. Prevention and control of proliferativevitreoretinopathy:primaryretinaldetachment surgery using silicone oil as a planned two-stage procedure in high-risk cases. Eye 2008; 22: 815-818
72.Heimann H et al. Primary pars plana vitrectomy. Techniques, indications and results. Ophthalmologe 2008; 105: 19-26
73.Abu El-Asrar AM, Al-Kwikbi HF, Kangave D. Prognostic factors after primary vitrectomy and perfluorocarbon liquids for bullous rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009; 19: 107-117.
78.Halberstadt M, Domig D, Kodjikian L, Koerner F, Garweg JG. PVR recurrence and the timing of silicon oil removal. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2006; 223: 361-366.
79.Lam RF et al. Retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a prognostic factor analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;
145:527-533
80.Berker N, Batman C, Ozdamar Y, Eranil S, Aslan O, Zilelioglu O.Long-term outcomes of heavy silicone oil tamponade for complicated retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007; 17: 797-803.
81.Stappler T, Heimann H, Wong D, Gibran SK, Groenewald C, Pearce IA. Heavy tamponade 2 Densiron 68 in routine clinical practice: anatomical and functional outcomes of a consecutive case series. Eye. 2008; 22: 1360-1365.
82.Li W, Zheng J, Zheng Q, Wu R, Wang X, Xu M.Clinical complications of Densiron 68 intraocular tamponade for complicated retinal detachment. Eye. 2009 Mar 27. [Epub ahead of print]
83.Wong D, Cazabon S, Ali H, Kumar I, Valldeperas X, Groenewald C, Pearce I. Can the sequential use of conventional silicone oil and heavy oil be a strategy for the management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;
35:181-184.
74.Schwartz SG, Flynn HW. Primary retinal detach84. Tseng JJ, Barile GR, Schiff WM, Akar Y, Vidne-Hay
ment. Scleral buckle or pars plana vitrectomy? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17:245-50
75.Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W. Management of retinal detachment when no break is found. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 398-403.
76.Smith M, Raman SV, Pappas G, Simcock P, Ling R, Shaw S. Phacovitrectomy for primary retinal detachment repair in presbyopes. Retina. 2007; 27: 462-467.
77.Vote B, Wheen L, Cluroe A, Teoh H, McGeorge A. Further evidence for proinflammatory nature of perfluorohexyloctane in the eye. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003; 31: 408-414.
O, Chang S. Influence of relaxing retinotomy on surgical outcomes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140: 628-636.
85.Quiram PA et al. Outcomes of vitrectomy with inferior retinectomy in patients with recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachments and proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 2041-2047
86.Grigoropoulos VG et al. Functional outcome and prognostic factors in 304 eyes, managed by retinectomy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;
245:641-649
Retinal andVitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
438
87.Iverson DA et al. Indications and results of relax97. Schönfeld CL. [Expression of the nuclear gluco-
ing retinotomy. Ophthalmolgy 1990; 97: 1298-1304
88.Lesnoni G, Rossi T, Gelso A, Nistril A. Patient satisfaction and vision improvement after multiple surgery for recurrent retinal detachment. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005; 15: 102-108.
89.Baba T, Tanaka S, Maesawa A, Teramatsu T, Noda Y. Closed funnel-shaped proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with cognitive disabilities. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007; 38: 189-95.
90.Patel NN, Bunce C, Asaria RH, Charteris DG. Resources involved in managing retinal detachment complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 2004; 24: 883-887.
91.Diddie K et al. Anterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy in the silicone oil study. Silicone Study Report Number 10. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1092-1099
92.Tseng JJ, Schiff WM, Barile GR, Biscette O, Williams SL, Cekic O, Dhrami-Gavazi E, Chang S. Influence of postoperative lens status on intraocular pressure in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147: 875-885, 885.e1-2.
93.Federman JL, Eagle RC. Extensive peripheral retinectomy combined with posterior 360 degrees retinotomy for retinal reattachment in advanced proliferativevitreoretinopathycases.Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 1305-1320
94.de Silva DJ, Kwan A, Bunce C, Bainbridge J. Predicting visual outcome following retinectomy for retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92: 954-958.
95.Banaee T, Hosseini SM, Eslampoor A, Abrishami M, Moosavi M. Peripheral 360-degrees retinectomy in complex retinal detachment. Retina. 2009 Mar 13. [Epub ahead of print]
corticoid receptor in human pigment epithelium]. Ophthalmologe 1998; 95:400-3
98.Furino C, Micelli Ferrari T, Boscia F, Cardascia N, Recchimurzo N, Sborgia C.Triamcinolone-assisted pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 2003; 23: 771-776.
99.Cheema RA et al. Triamcinolone acetonide as an adjuvant in the surgical treatment of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2007; 38: 365-70
100.Fekrat S et al. The effect of oral 13-cis-retinoic acid on retinal redetachment after surgical repair in eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1995; 102: 412-418
101.Chang YC, Hu DN, Wu WC. Effect of oral 13-cis- retinoic acid treatment on postoperative clinical outcome of eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146: 440-446.
102.Tano Y et al. Glucocorticosteroid inhibition of intraocular proliferation after injury. Am J Ophthalmol 1981; 91: 184-189
103.Lemor M et al. Oral colchizine for the treatment of experimental traction retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104:1226-9
104.Van Bockxmeer FM et al. Taxol for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1140-1147
105.Wiedemann P et al. Intraocular daunorubicin for the treatment and prophylaxis of traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;
104:10-14
106.Kirmani M et al. Antiproliferative drugs in the treatment of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina 1983; 3: 269-272
96.Pertile G, Claes C. Macular translocation with 360 107. Wu WC, Kao YH, Hu DN.A comparative study of
degree retinotomy for management of age-related macular degeneration with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 560-565
effects of antiproliferative drugs on human retinal pigment epithelial cells in vitro. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 18: 251-264.
108.Asaria RH et al. Adjuvant 5-fluorourazil and heparin prevents proliferative vitreoretinopathy: result from a randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1179-1183
109.Hui YN et al. Corticosteroids and daunomycin in the prevention of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy induced by macrophages. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1993; 231: 109-114
110.Dieudonné SC et al. Balance of vascular endothelial growth factor and pigmentepithelial growth factor prior to the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmic Res 2007; 39: 148-154
111.Roldán-Pallarés M et al. Retinal detachment: visual acuity and subretinal immunoreactive endothelin-1. J Fr Ophthalmol 2008; 31: 36-41
112.Iribarne M et al. Blockade of endothelinergic receptors prevents development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in mice. Am J Pathol 2008; 172: 1030-1042
113.Lei H et al. Growth factors outside the PDGF-family drive experimental PVR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50:3394-403
114.Oshima Y et al. Gene transfer to soluble TGF-beta type II receptor inhibits experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Gene Ther 2002; 9: 1214-1220
115.Ikuno Y, Kazlauskas A. An in vivo gene therapy approach for experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy using the truncated platelet–derived growth factor alpha receptor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2406-2411
116.La Heij LA et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor, glutamine synthetase, and interleukin-6 in vitreous fluid from eyes with retinal detachment, complicated by proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 367-75
117.Dieudonné SC et al. High TGF-beta2 levels during primary retinal detachment may protect against proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 4113-4118
ProliferativeVitreoretinopathy
439
118.Asaria RH et al. Silicone oil concentrates fibrogenic growth factors in the retro-oil fluid. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 439-442
119.Saika S et al. Inhibition of p38MAP kinase suppresses fibrotic reaction of retinal pigmentepithelial cells. Lab Invest 2005; 85: 838-50
120.Akiyama H et al. Intraocular injection of aptamer that binds PDGF-B. Potential treatment for proliferative retinopathies. J Cell Physiol 2006; 207: 407-412
121.Heckelen A, Hermel M, Kondring B, Schrage NF. Ascorbic acid reversibly inhibits proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004; 82: 564-568.
122.Itoh Y. Inhibition of RhoA/Rho-kinase pathway suppresses the expression of type I collagen induced by TGF-beta2 in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp Eye Research 2007; 84: 4634-4672
123.Kawahara S et al. Potent inhibition of cicatricial contraction in proliferative vitreoretinal diseases by statins. Diabetes 2008; 57:2784-93
124.Garcia RA, Sanchez JG, Arevalo JF. Combined 5-fluorouracil, low-molecular-weight heparin, and silicone oil in the management of complicated retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007;
38:276-282.
125.Wickham L, Bunce C, Wong D, McGurn D, Charteris DG.Randomized controlled trial of combined 5-Fluorouracil and low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of unselected rhegmatogenous retinal detachments undergoing primary vitrectomy. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 698-704.
126.Dugas B et al. The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009; 207: 319-324
127.Dogangil G et al. Toward Targeted Retinal Drug Delivery with Wireless Magnetic Microrobots. IROS 2008; in print)
Retinal andVitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery
440
128.Abbott JJ et al. Microrobotic applications in the different fields of medicine. Personal communication, 2009
129.Feron EJ, Veckeneer M, Parys-Van Ginderdeuren R, Van Lommel A, Melles GR, Stalmans P. Trypan blue staining of epiretinal membranes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 141-144.
130.Ueno A, Enaida H, Hata Y, Hisatomi T, Nakamura T, Mochizuki Y, Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T.Longterm clinical outcomes and therapeutic benefits of triamcinolone-assisted pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a case study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007; 17: 392-398.
131.Gandorfer A. Pharmacologic vitreolysis. Dev Ophthalmol. 2007; 39: 149-156.
Section 7
Vitrectomy Techniques
and Technology
