Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Selected Systemic Diseases_Arevalo_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
22.29 Mб
Скачать

334

 

J.F. Arévalo et al.

 

 

 

 

 

Statistics data was 4.6 per million, whereas the

Initial Considerations

proportion of in-hospital mortality from the nation-

and Epidemiology

wide inpatient sample in the USA was 2.9%.

 

 

African-Americans with lupus have twoto three-

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic,

fold higher lupus mortality risk than Caucasians.

idiopathic, multisystem inflammatory disease

The magnitude of the risk disparity is dispropor-

characterized by hyperactivity of the immune sys-

tionately higher than the disparity in all-cause

tem and prominent autoantibody production.

mortality, so a lupus-specific biological factor, as

Acute exacerbations of disease activity are fol-

opposed to socioeconomic and access-to-care fac-

lowed by periods of remission, and its course and

tors, may be responsible for this phenomenon [4].

spectrum of clinical manifestations are variable.

 

The disease can present in a variety of forms rang-

 

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus:

ing from mild cutaneous and joint involvement to

lethal renal, cardiac, and cerebral involvement.

General Diagnosis

According to a population-based study in a

 

geographically defined population over a 42-year

The diagnosis can be definitively established if 4

period, the incidence of SLE has nearly tripled

of the 11 American College of Rheumatology cri-

over the past four decades. [1] The average inci-

teria are met (Table 18.1 and “Controversies and

dence rate (age and sex adjusted to the 1970 US

Perspectives” section). Although ocular disease is

white population) was 5.56 per 100,000 (95%

associated with SLE (it may even be the first clini-

CI=3.93–7.19) during the period from 1980 to

cal manifestation of SLE), ocular lesions are not

1992, as compared with an incidence of 1.51 (95%

included among the 11 diagnostic criteria. Foster

CI=0.85–2.17) during the period from 1950 to

believes that this is an oversight, and that inclu-

1979. In general, studies reporting higher inci-

sion of ocular manifestations among the diagnos-

dence rates utilize more comprehensive case

tic criteria for SLE would lead to earlier diagnosis

retrieval methods. Later, two studies of self-

and therapeutic intervention in those instances.

reported diagnoses of SLE indicated that the prev-

Nowadays, ocular manifestations have been

alence of SLE in the United States might be much

included as one of the clinical parameters used to

higher than previously reported. One of these stud-

assess disease activity in the British Isles Lupus

ies validated the self-reported diagnoses of SLE by

Assessment Group 2004 index (BILAG-2004);

reviewing available medical records revealing a

furthermore, some studies suggest that ocular

prevalence of 124 cases per 100,000 [2].

manifestations themselves are associated with

The average age of onset is 30 years, with a

disease activity in lupus and others have shown

range from infancy to old age. In general, seven

ocular problems to be associated with particular

women are stricken with the disease for every

clinical manifestations of SLE such as neurologic

man, and women of childbearing age are 11 times

involvement and the presence of anticardiolipin

as likely to be affected as men, compared with a

antibodies [5].

2:1 female-to-male ratio in prepubertal girls and

 

postmenopausal women. This raises the question

 

of a potential role for hormones as either a caus-

Pathogenesis and Laboratory Findings

ative or exacerbating factor in SLE.

 

The survival rates for individuals with this con-

Systemic lupus erythematosus may derive from a

dition has significantly improved due to earlier

dysfunction in immunoregulation in a genetically

diagnosis, recognition of mild disease, increased

predisposed individual and may be triggered by

utilization of antinuclear antibody testing, and bet-

environmental agents such as microbes or chemi-

ter approaches to therapy [3]. According to

cals. Over the past decade, several studies have

Krishnan and Hubert [4], the overall, unadjusted,

helped uncover genetic associations and suscep-

lupus mortality in the National Center for Health

tibility loci in human lupus. More recently,

18 Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

335

 

 

Table 18.1 American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria for diagnosis of SLE (need four or more over any span of time for diagnosis)

Criteria for diagnosis of SLE

Criterion

Definition

1. Malar rash

Fixed erythema, flat or raised, over the malar eminences, tending to spare the

 

nasolabial folds

2. Discoid rash

Erythematosus raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and follicular

 

plugging; atrophic scarring may occur in older lesions

3. Photosensitivity

Skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, by patient history or

 

physician observation

4. Oral ulcers

Oral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by a physician

5. Arthritis

Nonerosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints, characterized by

 

tenderness, swelling, or effusion

6. Serositis

Pleuritis—convincing history of pleuritic pain or rub heard by a physician or

 

evidence of pleural effusion OR

 

Pericarditis—documented by EKG, rub or evidence of pericardial effusion

7. Renal disorder

Persistent proteinuria greater than 0.5 g per day or greater than 3+ if quantita-

 

tion not performed OR

 

Cellular casts—may be red cell, hemoglobin, granular, tubular, or mixed

 

 

8. Neurologic disorder

Seizures OR psychosis—in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic

 

derangements (uremia, ketoacidosis, or electrolyte imbalance)

 

 

9. Hematologic disorder

Hemolytic anemia—with reticulocytosis OR

 

 

 

Leukopenia—less than 4,000/mm3 total on two or more occasions OR

 

Lymphopenia—less than 1,500/mm3 on two or more occasions OR

 

Thrombocytopenia—less than 100,000/mm3 in the absence of offending drugs

10. Immunologic disorders

Positive antiphospholipid antibody OR

 

 

 

Anti-DNA—antibody to native DNA in abnormal titer OR

 

Anti-Sm—presence of antibody to Sm nuclear antigen OR

 

False-positive serologic test for syphilis known to be positive for at least six

 

months and confirmed by Treponema pallidum immobilization or fluorescent

 

treponemal antibody absorption test

11. Antinuclear antibody

An abnormal titer of antinuclear antibody by immunofluorescence or an

 

equivalent assay at any point in time and in the absence of drugs known to be

 

associated with “drug-induced lupus” syndrome

 

 

SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, EKG electrocardiogram

genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in SLE supported by government agencies, foundations, industry, and academic centers have uncovered a large number of associated genes in human SLE including several regions of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) with independent contributions to SLE risk [6]. Given this plethora of candidate genes, the next challenge for lupus biologists is to fathom how these different genes operate to engender lupus.

According to Crow [7], lupus-associated genes contribute to one or more essential mechanisms that must be implemented to generate lupus susceptibility (Fig. 18.1). Some genetic variants

(IRF5, PTPN22, STAT4, SPP1, FCGR2A, IRAK1, TNFAIP3) will facilitate innate immune system activation, particularly type I IFN (interferon) productions; other genetic variants (C2, C4, C1q, TREX1) will result in increased availability of self-antigen; and other genetic variants (HLA-DR, PTPN22, BLK, BANK1, FCGR2A, PXK, LYN, OX40L, SPP1) will alter the threshold for activation or regulation of cells of the adaptive immune response, resulting in production of autoantibodies. Additional genetic variants (ITGAM, KLK1, KLK3) might promote inflammation and damage to target organs or fail to protect those organs from proinflammatory mediators. The lupus-associated

336

J.F. Arévalo et al.

 

 

Fig. 18.1 Genetic determinants of lupus pathogenesis (Reproduced with permission from Crow MK. Developments in the clinical understanding of lupus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:245)

genetic variants prepare the immune system and target organs to be responsive to exogenous and endogenous triggers.

Innate Immune System Activation

Activation of the IFN pathway has been associated with the presence of autoantibodies specific for RNA-associated proteins, and the current literature supports RNA-mediated activation ofTLR (Toll-like receptor) as an important mechanism contributing to production of IFN-alpha and other proinflammatory cytokines. Activation of the IFN pathway is associated with renal disease and many measures of disease activity [7].

Increased Availability of Self-antigen and Apoptosis

Recent data has supported the hypothesis that components of the classical complement pathway are required for phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells, providing a possible explanation for the high frequency of SLE among the rare individuals with genetic deficiencies of those components, particularly C1q. Mutations have been identified in a DNase encoded by TREX1 in a SLE patient. Rare mutations in that gene are associated with a lupus-like syndrome

characterized by anti-DNA antibodies, high levels of IFN-alpha, and neurologic disease. It appears that altered structure or function of the TREX1-encoded DNase results in inefficient clearance of intracellular DNA rich in endogenous genomic repeat element sequences and induction of type I IFN [7].

Adaptive Immune Response

Activated T and B cells are features of SLE, and many of the genetic variants that are being studied in association with SLE are likely to contribute to immune activation and clinical disease by altering the threshold for lymphocyte activation or modifying the capacity of inhibitors of signaling pathways to appropriately function. The autoantibodies produced as a result of these T and B cells interactions may directly contribute to inflammation and tissue damage in target organs but also amplify immune system activation and autoimmunity through their delivery of stimulatory nucleic acids to TLRs [7].

Autoantibodies to a number of nuclear and cytoplasmic constituents may be present and may be the result of a generalized polyclonal B cell hyperactivity [8]. Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are elevated in about 95% of patients with SLE.