Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Selected Systemic Diseases_Arevalo_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
22.29 Mб
Скачать

188

J.F. Arévalo et al.

 

 

Fig. 9.42 Sporothrix schenckii. (a) Fundus photography showing retinal granuloma and fluffy opacities in the vitreous in the left eye. (b) Ulcerated skin lesions. (c) Positive culture for Sporothrix schenckii. (Modified and reprinted with permission from Curi AL, Felix S, Azevedo KM, et al. Retinal granuloma caused by Sporothrix schenckii. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:205–207)

Controversies and Perspectives

The last few decades have seen significant changes in health care with increasing numbers of heavily immunocompromised patients.

Because of new and more aggressive treatments, patients with severe immune defects are surviving longer and the spectrum of fungal pathogens is increasing. Until relatively recently, Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus were considered the only important nosocomial fungal pathogens. However, nonalbicans Candida species and other yeasts, together with an increasing range of molds apart from A. fumigatus are now reported to cause nosocomial fungal infections. The widespread use of azoles for prophylaxis and treatment has been linked with the emergence of non-albicans Candida species and other yeasts. Therefore prevention of nosocomial fungal infections is an increasingly important aspect of infection control.

Despite enormous advances in the field of infectious diseases, the identification of fungi as the cause of an infection is difficult to establish in cases of presumed fungus infection because of the nonspecific clinical signs and symptoms and the difficulties encountered in the isolation of these microorganisms in the microbiology laboratory. Delays in identification of fungal pathogens often lead to advanced disease and delay in the use of targeted antifungal therapy. To further compound the dilemma, treatment of fungus infection can be difficult given the paucity of commercial antifungal ophthalmic agents and the not-well-established criteria for antifungal sensitivity testing.

New classes and newer generations of antifungal therapies are being developed and may be important in combating this sight-threatening infectious disease.

The role of corticosteroids and its proper use in the treatment of fungal infections continues to be debated among experts. The controversy arises because there are two goals in the treatment of fungus infection that are inherently incompatible: (1) to get rid in the affected tissue of the replicating microorganisms causing the infection and (2) to limit the degree of structural damage caused by the infectious process.

9 Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Fungal Diseases

189

 

 

Focal Points

Fungal infections can be exogenous (postsurgical or posttraumatic) or endogenous.

Fungal endophthalmitis usually presents as a chronic panuveitis.

Fluffy deep yellow-white retinal or choroidal lesions are frequently present, and the vitreous often contains “fluff balls.”

The patient may not be symptomatic for days or even months until he or she develops blurred vision or floaters.

Later in the course, redness, pain, hypopyon, and dense vitreitis may occur.

Candida species are the most common organisms responsible for endogenous (as well as exogenous) fungal endophthalmitis.

Candida endophthalmitis usually occurs in chronically ill patients with an indwelling catheter. It is also a frequent complication of intravenous drug use.

Aspergillus species are the second most common cause of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis.

Diagnosis is confirmed unequivocally by culturing the fungus from patient specimens on appropriate media and by specific laboratory methods, including the finding of fungi on direct microscopic examination of specially stained tissue sections.

Histological features can be more rapidly diagnostic than culture when mycoses are caused by slow-growing fungi.

The time saved by allowing appropriate introduction of antifungal therapy can be critically important to preserving ocular structures.

Biopsy may provide proof that the fungus is invading tissue and that it is not merely a contaminant or saprophyte.

Histological examination and culture ideally are performed together.

For fungus infections that are limited to the eye, vitrectomy combined with intravitreal antifungals are the treatment of choice.

Acknowledgments The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any of the products or techniques mentioned in this article.

Supported in part by the Arévalo-Coutinho Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, Caracas, Venezuela.

References

1. Parke 2nd DW, Jones DB, Gentry LO. Endogenous endophthalmitis among patients with candidemia. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:789–96.

2. Rychener RO. Intra-ocular mycosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1933;31:477–96.

3. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:309–17.

4.Brooks RG. Prospective study of Candida endophthalmitis in hospitalized patients with candidemia. Arch

Intern Med. 1989;149:2226–8.

5. Feman SS, Nichols JC, Chung MS, et al. Endophthalmitis in patients with disseminated fungal disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100: 67–71.

6. Edwards Jr JE, Foos RY, Montgomerie JZ, et al. Ocular manifestations of Candida septicemia: review of seventy-six cases of hematogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1974;53:47–75.

7. Pettit TH, Edwards Jr JE, Purdy EP, et al. Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. In: Pepose JS, Holland GN, Wilhelmus KR, editors. Ocular infection and immunity. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1996. p. 1262.

8. Moyer DV, Edwards Jr JE. Candidu endophthalmitis and central nervous system infection. In: Bodey GP, editor. Candidiasis pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 331–5.

9. Shah CP, McKey J, Spirn MJ, et al. Ocular candidiasis: a review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:466–8.

10.Michelson PE, Stark W, Reeser F. Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1971;11:125–47.

11.Smiddy WE. Treatment outcomes of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1998;9:66–70.

12.Donahue SP, Greven CM, Zuravleff JJ, et al. Intraocular candidiasis in patients with candidemia. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1302–9.

13.Brourman ND, Blumenkranz MS. Fungal disease. In: Guyer DR, Yannuzzi LA, Chang S, Shields JA, Green WR, editors. Retina-vitreous-macula. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders; 1999. p. 772–92.

14.Barrie T. The place of elective vitrectomy in the management of patients with Candida endophthalmitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225:107–13.

15. Brod RD, Flynn HW, Clarkson JG, et al. Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:666–74.

16.Henderson DK, Edwards Jr JE, Montgomerie JZ. Hematogenous Candida endophthalmitis in patients

190

J.F. Arévalo et al.

 

 

receiving parenteral hyperalimentation fluids. J Infect Dis. 1981;143:655–61.

17.Mathis A, Malecaze F, Bessieres MH, et al. Immunological analysis of the aqueous humour in

Candida endophthalmitis. II: clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988;l72:313–6.

18.Sowmya P, Madhavan HN. Diagnostic utility of polymerase chain reaction on intraocular specimens to establish the etiology of infectious endophthalmitis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19:812–7.

19.Yang YS. Results of extensive surgical treatment of seven consecutive cases of postoperative fungal endophthalmitis. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009;23:159–63.

20.Kotler-Barjtburg J, Price HD, Medoff G, et al. Molecular basis for the selective toxicity of amphotericin B for yeast and filipin animal cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974;5:377.

21.Thompson 3rd GR, Cadena J, Patterson TF. Overview of antifungal agents. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:203–15.

22.Stern GA, Fetkenhour CL, OGrady RB. Intravitreal amphotericin B treatment of Candida endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:89–93.

23.Schmid S, Martenet AC, Oelz O. Candida endophthalmitis: clinical presentation, treatment and outcome in

23 patients. Infection. 1991;19:21–4.

24. Savani DV, Perfect JR, Cobo LM, et al. Penetration of new azole compounds into the eye and efficacy in experimental Candida endophthalmitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31:6.

25. Luttrull JK, Wan WL, Kubak BM, et al. Treatment of ocular fungal infections with oral fluconazole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:477–81.

26.Sud IJ, Feingold DS. Effect of ketoconazole on the fungicidal action of amphotericin B in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1983;23:185–7.

27.Shen X, Xu G. Vitrectomy for endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2009;17: 148–52.

28.Bakri SJ, Sears JE, Procop GW, et al. Excellent visual outcome following Aspergillus flavus endogenous endophthalmitis-farmer’s lung disease. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30:99–101.

29.Lance SE, Friberg TR, Kowalski RP. Aspergillus

flavus endophthalmitis and retinitis in an intravenous drug abuser. A therapeutic success. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:947–9.

30. Augsten R, Königsdörffer E, Oehme A, et al. Bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1998;212:120–2.

31. Jampol LM, Dyckman S, Moniatez Z, et al. Retinal and choroidal infarction from Aspergillus: clinical diagnosis and clinicopathologic correlations. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1988;86:422–40.

32.Wishaar PD, Flynn HW, Murray TG, et al. Endogenous Aspergillus endophthalmitis: clinical

features and treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:57–65.

33. Aziz AA, Bullock JD, McGuire TW, et al. Aspergillus endophthalmitis: a clinical and experimental study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1992;90:317–42.

34. Bodoia RD, Kinyoun JL, Lou QL, et al. Aspergillus necrotizing retinitis: a clinicopathologic study and review. Retina. 1989;9:226–31.

35. van der Linden JW, Warris A, van der Meer JW, et al. Azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:A765.

36.Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Nehemy MB. Use of voriconazole in the surgical management of chronic postoperative fungal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:425–31.

37.Henderly DE, Liggett PE, Rao NA. Cryptococcal chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis. Retina. 1987;7:75–9.

38.Chapman-Smith JS. Cryptococcus and the eye. Trans

Ophthalmol Soc N Z. 1981;33:42–5.

39. Shulman J, de la Cruz EL, Latkany P, et al. Cryptococcal chorioretinitis with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2009;17:314–5.

40.Wykoff CC, Albini TA, Couvillion SS, et al. Intraocular cryptococcoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:700–2.

41.Arévalo JF, Fuenmayor-Rivera D, Giral AE, et al. Indocyanine green videoangiography of multifocal Cryptococcus neoformans choroiditis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Retina. 2001;21:537–41.

42.Alexander PB, Coodley LE. Disseminated coccid-

ioidomycosis with intraocular involvement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;64:283–9.

43.AmpelNM,DolsCL,GalgianiJN.Coccidioidomycosis during human immunodeficiency virus infection: results of a prospective study in a coccidioidal endemic area. Am J Med. 1993;94:235–40.

44.Blumenkranz MS, Stevens DA. Endogenous coccidioidal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1980;87: 974–84.

45. Cunningham Jr ET, Seiff SR, Berger TG, et al. Intraocular coccidioidomycosis diagnosed by skin biopsy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:674–7.

46. Woods AC, Wahlen HE. The probable role of benign histoplasmosis in the etiology of granulomatous uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1960;49:205–20.

47.Schwarz J, Salfelder K, Viloria JE. Histoplasma capsuluturn in vessels of the choroid. Am Ophthalmol. 1977;9:633–6.

48.Cohen PR, Grossman ME, Silvers DN. Disseminated histoplasmosis and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Int J Dermatol. 1991;30:614–22.

49.Singh G. Presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. In: Foster CS, Vitale AT, editors. Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders;

2002. p. 348–63.

50. Derosa JT, Yannuzzi LA, Marmor M, et al. Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization in young patients: a case–control study. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995–1996;91:207–22.

51.McMillan TA, Lashkari K. Ocular histoplasmosis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996;36(3):179–86.

52. Li S, Perlman JI, Edward DP, Weiss R. Unilateral Blastomyces dermatitidis endophthalmitis and orbital

9 Retinal and Choroidal Manifestations of Fungal Diseases

191

 

 

cellulitis. A case report and literature review. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1466–70.

53. Gnann Jr JW, Bressler GS, Bodet III CA, Avent CK. Human blastomycosis after a dog bite. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:48–9.

54.Chapman SW, Bradsher Jr RW, Campbell Jr GD, et al. Practice guidelines for the management of patients with blastomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:679–83.

55.Levy JH. Intraocular sporotrichosis: report of a case. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85:574–9.

56.Agger WA, Caplan RH, Maki DG. Ocular sporotrichosis mimicking mucormycosis in a diabetic. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978;10:767.

57. Kurosawa A, Pollock SC, Collins MP, et al. Sporothrix schenckii endophthalmitis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:376–80.

58.Font RI, Jakobiec FA. Granulomatous necrotizing retinochoroiditis caused by Sporotrichum schenckii: report of a case including immunofluorescence and electron microscopical studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:1513–9.

59.Stevens DA. The new generation of antifungal drugs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7: 732–5.