Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Retinal Vein Occlusions_ Evidence-Based Management_Browning_2012.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
23.65 Mб
Скачать

11.7 Summary of Key Points

261

A minority of ophthalmologists apply PRP prophylactically after ischemic CRVO to prevent ASNV.41,45,46 Because 65% of eyes categorized as ischemic or indeterminate never develop ASNV, and PRP causes loss of peripheral visual field, most ophthalmologists do not recommend prophylactic PRP in this setting.25,43,55,71

Regression of anterior segment neovascularization after panretinal ablation with laser or

cryotherapy has been reported in 23–85% of cases.8,9 The range of time between laser PRP and regression of NVI is 5–50 weeks with a median time of 23 weeks.9 Neovascular glaucoma develops despite PRP in 1.6% of cases. Tube-shunt surgery is necessary in such cases to restore the pressure to normal. Intravitreal bevacizumab can be useful preoperatively in such cases to reduce intraoperative bleeding.8

Why Is Anterior Segment Neovascularization Less Common in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Than in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion?

The incidence of iris neovascularization after ischemic central retinal vein occlusion is higher (32–70%) than the incidence after central retinal artery occlusion (18%).11,22,30,46,47,71 The currently accepted hypothesis to explain this difference is that central retinal artery occlusion produces cell death without ischemia and therefore less production of VEGF. VEGF can be produced by stressed, hypoxic retinal cells in CRVO but not by anoxic, dead cells in central retinal artery occlusion.2

11.6Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion

In a retrospective study of 106 eyes of 104 patients with HCRVO followed for a mean of 21 months, 8.5% developed NVI and 2.8% developed NVG.60 There was a positive correlation between the ischemic index and NVI and NVG. All cases of NVI occurred within 12 months of the diagnosis of HCRVO.60 In a prospective case series, NVI developedin1.9%ofischemicHCRVOs. NVA developed in 6.5% of ischemic HCRVOs.25 NVG developed “rarely”.25 Hayreh reports having seen one case in his career.25 However, not all reports agree that NVG is so rare after HCRVO.27

11.7 Summary of Key Points

ASNV is a consequence of abnormally elevated aqueous VEGF levels caused by retinal ischemia.

Levels of VEGF high enough to cause ASNV do not occur after macular BRVO, occur rarely after major BRVO, uncommonly after HCRVO, and commonly after CRVO.

Clinical detection of ASNV is most sensitive if the pupil is not dilated and if gonioscopy is performed.

NVI can be distinguished from iris vascular hamartomas by morphology, location on the iris, and clinical context.

The risk of ASNV after CRVO increases as the visual acuity decreases, the amplitude of the RAPD increases, and the area of capillary nonperfusion on FA increases.

Confidence in any single test or combination of tests’ ability to predict later ASNV when the tests are done at the disease onset is low because the disease is dynamic and the studies have poor reproducibility in clinical practice. There is no substitute for frequent follow-up when clinical doubt exists regarding the classification of the CRVO.

Monitoring for ASNV after CRVO needs to be most frequent in the first 6 months after

262

11 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion

diagnosis with a tapering schedule of followup thereafter.

Iris fluorescein angiography is more sensitive than clinical examination for the detection of ASNV but is rarely used.

There are elaborate classification schemes for ASNV distinguished by their lack of adoption in practice.

Not all cases of ASNV after CRVO progress to NVG, but in the absence of treatment, most cases do progress. This is the basis for PRP when ASNV develops.

PRP after ischemic RVO with ASNV causes reduction in intraocular levels of VEGF that parallels regression of the new vessels.

PRP is applied when ASNV appears, not prophylactically. If follow-up is uncertain, PRP is occasionally applied in the setting of ischemic CRVO in the absence of ASNV.

Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF drugs can provide rapid, but temporary, regression of ASNV, allowing time to apply PRP for a more sustained effect.

References

1. Adamis AP, Shima DT, Tolentino MJ, Gragoudas ES, Ferrara N, Folkman J, D’Amore PA, Miller JW. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor prevents retinal ischemia-associated iris neovascularization in a nonhuman primate. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:66–71.

2. Aiello LP, Arrigg PG, Keyt BA, Jampel HD, Shah ST, Pasquale LR, Thieme H, Iwamoto MA, Park JE. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1480–7.

3. Ambati J, Chalam KV, Chawla DK, D’Angio CT, Guillet EG, Rose SJ, Vanderlinde RE, Ambati BK. Elevated gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1161–6.

4. Anderson DM, Morin JD, Hunter WS. Rubeosis iridis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1971;6:183–8.

5. Avery RL. Regression of retinal and iris neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) treatment. Retina. 2006;26:352–6.

6. Bandello F, Brancato R, Lattanzio R, Falcomata B, Malegori A. Biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiog-

raphy of the iris in the detection of diabetic iridopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231:444–8.

7.Bandello F, Brancato R, Lattanzio R, Galdini M, Falcomata B. Relation between iridopathy and retinopathy in diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:542–5.

8. Batioglu F, Astam N, Ozmert E. Rapid improvement of retinal and iris neovascularization after a single intravitreal bevacizumab injection in a patient with central retinal vein occlusion and neovascular glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2008;28:59–61.

9. Boyd SR, Zachary I, Chakravarthy U, Allen GJ, Wisdom GB, Cree IA, Martin JF, Hykin PG. Correlation of increased vascular endothelial growth factor with neovascularization and permeability in ischemic central vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1644–50.

10.Browning DJ, Rotberg MH. The relationship of diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. In: Browning DJ, editor. Diabetic retinopathy: evidence based management. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 325–47.

11.Browning DJ, Scott AQ, Peterson CB, Warnock J, Zhang Z. The risk of missing angle neovascularization by omitting screening gonioscopy in acute central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1998;105: 776–84.

12.Chan CK, Ip MS, VanVeldhuisen PC, Score Study Group, et al. Score study report #11: incidents of neovascular events in eyes with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1364–72.

13. Coleman SL, Green WR, Patz A. Vascular tufts of the pupillary margin of the iris. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:881–3.

14.Dahlmann AH, Benson MT. Spontaneous hyphema secondary to iris vascular tufts. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1728.

15.Davidorf FH, Mouser JG, Derick RJ. Rapid improvement of rubeosis iridis from a single bevacizumab (avastin) injection. Retina. 2006;26:354–6.

16.Davies N. Letter. Eye. 2001;15:688–91.

17.Elman MJ. Thrombolytic therapy for central retinal vein occlusion: results of a pilot study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:471–504.

18.Evans K, Wishart PK, McGalliard JN. Neovascular complications after central retinal vein occlusion. Eye. 1993;7:520–4.

19.Fong ACO, Schatz H, McDonald HR, Burton TC, Maberley AL, Joffe L, Zegarra H, Nadel AJ, Johnson RN. Central retinal vein occlusion in young adults

(papillophlebitis). Retina. 1992;12:3–11.

20. Fuller JJ, Mason III JO, White Jr MF, McGwin Jr G, Emond TL, Feist RM. Retinochoroidal collateral veins protect against anterior segment neovascularization after central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:332–6.

21.Funatsu H, Yamashita H, Mimura T, Noma H, Nakamura S, Hori S. Risk evaluation of outcome of vitreous surgery based on vitreous levels of cytokines. Eye. 2007;21:377–82.

22.Gartner S, Henkind P. Neovascularization of the iris (rubeosis iridis). Surv Ophthalmol. 1978;22:291–312.

References

263

23.Gutman FA. Discussion. Ophthalmology. 1982;89: 783–4.

24.Hamanaka T, Akabane N, Yajima T, Takahashi T, Tanabe A. Retinal ischemia and angle neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:648–58.

25.Hayreh SS. Retinal vein occlusion. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1994;42:109–32.

26.Hayreh SS. Evidence-based recommendations for neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2003;110: 1–2.

27.Hayreh SS, Hayreh MS. Hemi-central retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, clinical features, and natural history. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:798–9.

28.Hayreh SS, Klugman MR, Beri M, Kimura AE, Podhajsky P. Differentiation of ischemic from nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion during the early phase. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228:201–17.

29.Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman MB. Natural history of visual outcome in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:119–33.

30.Hayreh SS, Rojas P, Podhajsky P, Montague P, Woolson RF. Ocular neovascularization with retinal vascular occlusion-III: incidence of ocular neovascularization with retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:488–506.

31.Hayreh SS, Rubenstein L, Podhajsky P. Argon laser photocoagulation in treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion.Aprospectiveclinicaltrial.Ophthalmologica. 1993;206:1–14.

32. Hikichi T, Konno S, Trempe CL. Role of the vitreous in central retinal vein occlusion. Retina. 1995;15: 29–33.

33. Hvarfner C, Larsson J. Is optic nerve head swelling of prognostic value in central retinal vein occlusion? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;241: 463–7.

34.Jensen VA, Lundbaek K. Fluorescence angiography of the iris in recent and long-term diabetics. Acta Ophthalmol. 1968;46:584–5.

35.John T, Sassani JW, Eagle RC. The myofibroblastic component of rubeosis iridis. Ophthalmology. 1983; 1983:721–8.

36.Keenan JM, Dodson PM, Kritzinger EE. Are there medical conditions specifically underlying the development of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion? Eye. 1993;7:407–10.

37.Kottow MH. Iris neovascular tufts. Arch Ophthalmol.

1980;98:2084.

38. Kubota T, Tawara A, Hata T, Khalil A, Inomata H. Neovascular tissue in the intertrabecular spaces in eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:750–4.

39.Laatikainen L. Preliminary report on effect of retinal panphotocoagulation on rubeosis iridis and neovascu-

lar glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977;61:278–84.

40. Laatikainen L, Blach RK. Behavior of the iris vasculature in central retinal vein occlusion: a fluorescein

angiographic study of the vascular response of the retina and the iris. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977;61:272–7.

41.Laatikainen L, Kohner EM, Khoury D, Blach RK. Panretinal photocoagulation in central retinal vein occlusion: a randomized controlled clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977;61:741–53.

42.Lattanzio R, Gimeno AT, Parodi MB, Bandello F. Retinal vein occlusion: current treatment. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225:135–43.

43.Lindblom B. Fluorescein angiography of the iris in the management of eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:188–91.

44.Little HL, Rosenthal AR, Dellaporta A, Jacobson DR. The effect of panretinal photocoagulation on rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81:804–9.

45.Magargal LE, Brown GC, Augsburger JJ, Donoso LA. Efficacy of panretinal photocoagulation in preventing neovascular glaucoma following ischemic central retinal vein obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1982;89: 780–4.

46.Magargal LE, Brown GC, Augsburger JJ, Parrish RK. Neovascular glaucoma following central retinal vein obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:1095–101.

47.Magargal LE, Donoso LA, Sanborn GE. Retinal ischemia and risk of neovascularization following central retinal vein obstruction. Ophthalmology. 1982;89: 1241–5.

48.Malecaze F, Clamens S, Simorre-Pinnatel V, Mathis A, Chollet P, Favard C, Bayard F, Plouet J. Detection of vascular endothelial growth factor messenger RNA and vascular endothelial growth factor-like activity in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1476–82.

49.Mason G. Iris neovascular tufts. Ann Ophthalmol.

1980;12:420–2.

50. May DR, Klein ML, Peyman G, Raichand M. Xenon arc panretinal photocoagulation for central retinal vein occlusion: a randomized prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:725–34.

51. Nomura T, Furukawa H, Kurinoto S. Development and classification of neovascular glaucoma in diabetic eye disease: histopathological study. Acta Ophthalmol Soc Jpn. 1976;86:166–75.

52. Nork TM, Tso MOM, Duvall J, Hayreh SS. Cellular mechanisms of iris neovascularization secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107: 581–6.

53.Ohnishi Y, Ishibashi T, Sagawa T. Fluorescein gonioangiography in diabetic neovascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994;232:199–204.

54.Ohrt V. Rubeosis iridis diabetica. Acta Ophthalmol. 1958;36:556–8.

55.Parodi MB, Friberg TR, Pedio M, Fiotti N, Di Stefano G, Ravalico G. Panretinal photocoagulation and photodynamic therapy for anterior segment neovascularization secondary to ischemic central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2007;38: 94–9.

264

11 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion

56.Quinlan P, Elman MJ, Bhatt AK, Mardesich P, Enger C. The natural course of central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;110:118–23.

57.Recchia FM, Carvalho-Recchia CA, Hassan TS. Clinical course of younger patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:317–21.

58.Roth SM, Brown GC. The diagnosis and management of rubeosis iridis. Clin Signs Ophthalmol. 1989;10:1–15.

59.Sanborn GE, Symes DJ, Magaragal LE. Fundus-iris fluorescein angiography: evaluation of its use in the diagnosis of rubeosis iridis. Ann Ophthalmol. 1986;18:52–8.

60.Sanborn GE, Magargal LE. Characteristics of the hemispheric retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:1616–26.

61.Schulze RR. Rubeosis iridis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967;63:487–95.

62.Servais GE, Thompson HS, Hayreh SS. Relative afferent pupillary defect in central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:301–3.

63.Sinclair SH, Gragoudas ES. Prognosis for rubeosis iridis following central retinal vein occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:735–43.

64.Sivalingam A, Kenney J, Brown GC, Benson WE, Donoso L. Basic fibroblast growth factor levels in the vitreous of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:869–72.

65.Steel DHW, Habib MS, Park S, Hildreth AJ, Owen RI. Entry site neovascularization and vitreous cavity hemorrhage after diabetic vitrectomy the predictive value of inner sclerostomy site ultrasonography. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:525–32.

66.Tauber J, Lahav M, Erzurum SA. New clinical classificationforirisneovascularization.Ophthalmology. 1987;94:542–4.

67. Teich SA, Walsh JB. A grading system for iris neovas- cularization-prognostic implications for treatment. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:1102–6.

68.Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Awaya S. Fluorescein angiography of peripheral retina and pars plana during vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:370–6.

69.The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Baseline and early natural history report. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1087–95.

70.The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Evaluation of grid pattern photocoagulation for macular edema in central vein occlusion, the central vein occlusion study group M report. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1425–33.

71.The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group. Natural history and clinical management of central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:486–91.

72. The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group N Report. A randomized clinical trial of early panretinal photocoagulation for ischemic central vein occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1434–44.

73.Tolentino MJ, McLeod DS, Taomoto M, Otsuji T, Adamis AP, Lutty GA. Pathologic features of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced retinopathy in the nonhuman primate. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133: 373–85.

74.Tolentino MJ, Miller JW, Gragoudas ES, Chatzistefanou K, Ferrara N, Adamis AP. Vascular endothelial growth factor is sufficient to produce iris neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma in a nonhuman primate. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114: 964–70.

75.Tripathi RC, Li J, Tripathi BJ, Chalam KV, Adamis AP. Increased level of vascular endothelial growth factor in aqueous humor of patients with neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:232–7.

76.Vadala G, Zanini A, Favero C, Brogliatti B, Boles Carenini B. Evaluation of the clinical course of central retinal vein occlusion in eyes with and without glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75(S224):16–7.

77.Vannas A. Fluorescein angiography of the vessels of the iris. Acta Ophthalmol. 1969;105:1–75.

78. Wand M, Dueker DK, Aiello LM, Grant WM. Effects of panretinal photocoagulation on rubeosis iridis, angle neovascularization, and neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;86:332–9.

79.Weiss DI, Gold D. Neofibrovascularization of iris and anterior chamber angle: a clinical classification. Ann Ophthalmol. 1978;10:488–91.

80.Weiter JJ, Zuckerman R. The influence of the photore- ceptor-RPEcomplexontheinnerretina.Ophthalmology. 1980;87:1133–9.

81.Williamson T, Rumley A, Lowe GDO. Blood viscosity, coagulation, and activated protein C resistance in central retinal vein occlusion: a population controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:203–8.

82.Williamson TH, Baxter GM. Central retinal vein

occlusion, an investigation by color Doppler imaging. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1362–72.

83. Zegarra H, Gutman FA, Conforto J. The natural course of central retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979;86:1931–9.

Chapter 12

Macular Edema in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Macular edema (ME) is deÞned as swelling from increased ßuid in the macula.3,17 It is recognized by thickening that can be detected sensitively by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and, when more prominent, by slit lamp biomicroscopy.10 It may be signaled by ßuorescein leakage on late frames of ßuorescein angiography (FA), but there are cases in which no ßuorescein leakage is apparent (see Fig. 8.3).

There are two types of ME in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) Ð vasogenic ME and cytotoxic ME (see Chap. 2).8,40 In vasogenic ME, the tissue is not necrotic, but the endothelial permeability is increased with transudation of vascular ßuid into the extracellular space. In cytotoxic ME, tissue necrosis with intracellular edema occurs Þrst, followed by extracellular edema as the cell membranes break down and water is drawn into the enlarged and hypertonic extracellular space. Cytotoxic, or ischemic, ME often resolves spontaneously.17 It is heralded by areas of macular capillary nonperfusion. A broken foveal avascular zone border has a strong correlation with macular ischemia.17

In a clinical sense, ME is recognized by thickening appreciated on stereoscopic slit lamp biomicroscopy with a fundus lens. Some deÞne the term to mean at least one disc area (DA) of involvement and involvement of the fovea.39,43 OCT-documented ME is often missed on clinical examination, especially when the macular thickness is less than 300 m with Stratus OCT.7,10

Chapters 1 and 2 covered the pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of ME in RVO. In this chapter the emphasis is clinical. Cases are shown with

examples of the range of Þndings commonly encountered along with comments correlating Þndings from relevant ancillary tests. Treatment of ME in RVO is covered in Chap. 13. Abbreviations commonly used in the discussion of ME in RVO are listed in Table 12.1. Each abbreviation is spelled out at its Þrst occurrence.

Table 12.1 Abbreviations used in macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion

Abbreviation

Term

BRVO

Branch retinal vein occlusion

CRVO

Central retinal vein occlusion

CSMT

Central subÞeld mean thickness

CVOS

Central vein occlusion study

DA

Disc area

FA

Fluorescein angiogram

ICAM-1

Intercellular adhesion molecule-1

logMAR

Logarithm of the minimum angle of

 

resolution

ME

Macular edema

ml

Milliliter

mMicron

OCT

Optical coherence tomography

pg

Picogram

PVD

Posterior vitreous detachment

RVO

Retinal vein occlusion

SCORE

Standard care versus corticosteroid

 

for retinal vein occlusion

sVEGFR-2

Soluble vascular endothelial growth

 

factor receptor-2

SD-OCT

Spectral domain optical coherence

 

tomography

VA

Visual acuity

VEGF

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGFR-2

Vascular endothelial growth factor

 

receptor-2

 

 

D.J. Browning, Retinal Vein Occlusions, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3439-9_12,

265

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012