- •Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •1.1 Anatomy and Histology
- •1.2 Microanatomy of the Retina
- •1.3 Vascular Anatomy
- •Bernoulli’s Principle and Deductions Concerning Changes in Central Retinal Vein Diameter at the Lamina Cribrosa
- •1.4 Pathologic Anatomy
- •1.4.1 Abnormalities of the Vessel Wall
- •1.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •2.1 Abnormalities of the Blood
- •2.1.1 Thrombosis
- •2.1.2 Viscosity of Blood
- •2.2 Abnormalities of Blood Flow
- •2.2.1 Retinal Vascular Hemodynamics
- •2.2.1.1 Laplace’s Law
- •2.2.1.2 Poiseuille’s Law
- •A Misapplication of Poiseuille’s Law
- •2.2.1.3 Hemodynamics of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •How Severe Must Central Venous Obstruction Be to Produce Symptoms?
- •The Central Retinal Artery in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.2.1.4 Hemodynamics of BRVO
- •2.3 Macular Edema
- •2.3.1 Macular Anatomy and Its Relationship to Macular Edema in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.3.2 Starling’s Law
- •2.3.3 The Retinal Pigment Epithelial Pump
- •2.3.4 Molecular Signaling in Macular Edema
- •Relevant Molecular Biologic Terminology
- •2.3.4.1 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- •2.3.4.2 Other Retinal Cytokines with Lesser Roles
- •2.3.4.3 Molecular Signaling in BRVO
- •2.3.4.4 Molecular Signaling in CRVO
- •What Does the Response of RVO to Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs Say About Pathophysiology?
- •2.4 Retinal Neovascularization
- •Spontaneous Venous Pulsations and CRVO
- •2.7 Animal Models of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.7.1 Animal Models of BRVO
- •2.7.2 Animal Models of CRVO
- •2.8 Summary of Key Points
- •2.9 Future Directions
- •References
- •3.1 Background for Clinical Genetics
- •3.2 The Role of Polymorphisms in Genetic Studies
- •3.3 Types of Genetic Study Design
- •Why Are So Many Association Studies for Retinal Vein Occlusion Negative?
- •3.4 Studies of the Genetics of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.1 Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor Genes
- •3.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.3 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.4 202210G > A Mutation of the Prothrombin Gene (Factor II Leiden)
- •3.4.6 Protein C
- •3.4.7 Protein S
- •3.4.8 Fibrinogen
- •3.4.9 Factor XII
- •3.4.12 Other Negative Genetic Association Studies
- •3.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •4.1 Nosology of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Nonischemic and Ischemic Hemispheres
- •4.3.1 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Forms of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Quantifying Risk
- •The Major Epidemiologic Studies of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2 Prevalence
- •5.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3 Incidence
- •5.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4 Risk and Protective Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2 Gender
- •5.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.3 CRVO
- •5.4.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.4.3 Race
- •5.4.4 Laterality
- •5.4.5 Body Mass Index
- •5.4.6 Education
- •5.4.7 Physical Activity
- •5.4.8 Miscellaneous Factors Explored and Not Found Important
- •5.5.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.6 Life Expectancy
- •5.7 Visual Impact of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Systemic Associations
- •6.2.1 Hypertension
- •6.2.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2 Diabetes Mellitus
- •6.2.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3 Hyperlipidemia
- •6.2.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4 Cardiovascular Disease
- •6.2.4.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.4 Stroke
- •6.2.4.5 Carotid Artery Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease
- •6.2.5 Rheologic and Hematologic Abnormalities
- •6.2.6 Coagulation Abnormalities
- •6.2.6.1 Antiphospholipid Antibodies
- •6.2.6.2 Factor VII
- •6.2.6.3 Factor VIII
- •6.2.6.4 Lipoprotein a
- •6.2.6.5 Von Willebrand Factor
- •6.2.6.6 Other Coagulation Factors
- •6.2.7 Hyperhomocysteinemia
- •6.2.7.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.8 Serum Folate
- •6.2.9 Serum B12
- •6.2.10 Smoking
- •6.2.11 Alcohol Consumption
- •6.2.14 No Underlying Vascular Risk Factor
- •6.3 Ocular Associations
- •6.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.4 Practical Recommendations About the Systemic Workup of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •History of the Standard Workup for Systemic Associations in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.5 Retinal Vein Occlusion and Cardiovascular Disease Risk
- •6.6 Differences in Systemic Associations Between Ischemic and Nonischemic CRVOs
- •6.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •7.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.1.1 Acute Phase
- •7.1.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.1.3 Chronic Phase
- •7.1.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •Why Does the Visual Outcome in Nonischemic, Macula-Involving Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions Usually Vary with the Size of the Involved Retina?
- •7.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.2.1 Acute Phase
- •7.2.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.2.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •When Retinal Venous Congestion and Optic Disc Edema Are Not Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •What Is the Relationship of Central Retinal Artery Pressure and Cilioretinal Artery Pressure?
- •Retinal Whitening Does Not Equal Infarction
- •A Clinical Picture Predicted by a Hypothesis
- •7.2.1.3 Visual Acuity
- •7.2.2 Chronic Phase
- •Why Are Optic Disc Collaterals Associated with Worse Initial and Final Visual Acuity After CRVO?
- •7.2.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •7.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Which Measure of Reproducibility Is Best?
- •8.1 Color Fundus Photography
- •8.2 Fluorescein Angiography
- •8.2.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.3 Optical Coherence Tomography and the Retinal Thickness Analyzer
- •Methods of Analysis of OCT in RVO
- •8.4 Visual Field Testing
- •8.5 Electroretinography
- •Electroretinography Essentials for Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •8.5.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.6 Indocyanine Green Angiography
- •8.7 Color Doppler Ultrasonographic Imaging
- •8.8 Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.9 Ophthalmodynamometry
- •8.10 Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.11 Laser Interferometry to Measure Pulsatile Choroidal Blood Flow
- •8.12 Vitreous Fluorophotometry
- •8.13 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •9.1 Terminology
- •9.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.1 Clinical Characteristics
- •In the Face of Evidence that Fluorescein Angiography Is Poorly Predictive of Ischemia in Acute Central Retinal Vein Occlusion, Why Is It Widely Used?
- •9.3.2 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.3 Outcomes by Ischemic Status
- •9.4 Interaction of Ischemia with Effects of Treatments
- •9.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •10.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.4 Treatment of Posterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •11.1 The Pathoanatomy and Pathophysiology of Iris and Angle Neovascularization
- •11.2 Clinical Picture of Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •11.4 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.5 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •The Problem of Undetected Anterior Segment Neovascularization After Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Why Is Anterior Segment Neovascularization Less Common in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Than in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion?
- •11.6 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •12.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.3 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Visual Acuity Measurement in Treatment Studies
- •OCT Measurement of Macular Thickness in Treatment Studies
- •13.1 Medical Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.1.1 Anticoagulation
- •13.1.2 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •13.1.3 Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •Recipe for Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •13.1.4 Plasmapheresis
- •13.2 Treatment of Previously Unsuspected Risk Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.3.1 Treatments for Macular Edema
- •Relative Corticosteroid Potencies
- •13.3.2 Treatments for Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.4 Results of Clinical Studies of Treatments for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •13.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.1.1 Grid Laser
- •13.4.1.2 Subthreshold Grid Laser Treatment
- •13.4.1.3 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation
- •13.4.1.5 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone
- •13.4.1.6 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.1.7 Combination Treatments Involving Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injections
- •13.4.1.8 Arteriovenous Sheathotomy
- •13.4.1.9 Vitrectomy
- •13.4.1.10 Intravitreal Injection of Autologous Plasmin
- •13.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.2.2 Combination Regimen: Bevacizumab, Panretinal Laser, and Grid Laser
- •13.4.2.3 Systemic Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.4 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone Injection
- •13.4.2.5 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.6 Vitrectomy
- •13.5 Treatment of Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.5.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Retinal and Disc Neovascularization After Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.5.2 Vitrectomy for Intraocular Neovascularization with Vitreous Hemorrhage
- •13.5.3 Laser Panretinal Photocoagulation for Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •13.6 Economic Considerations
- •13.7 Future Directions
- •13.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •14.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions in the Young
- •14.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.4 Workup in the Younger Patient with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •14.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •15.1 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Serous Retinal Detachment in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.2 Laser Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.1.3 Intravenous Infusion of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.4 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.5 Macular Puncture for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.1 Grid Laser for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.2 Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2.3 Radial Optic Neurotomy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.4 Retinal Endovascular Surgery with Intravenous Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.5 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.6 Intravitreal Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Triamcinolone
- •15.2.7 Systemic Acetazolamide for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with ME
- •15.2.8 Combined Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •15.2.9 Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression
- •15.2.10 Section of the Posterior Scleral Ring
- •15.2.11 Infusion of High Molecular Weight Dextran
- •15.3 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for HCRVO
- •15.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •16.1 Case 16.1: An Asymptomatic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Asymmetric Hemispheric Involvement
- •16.1.1 Discussion
- •16.2 Case 16.2: Chronic Macular Branch Vein Occlusion with Subtle Ophthalmoscopic Signs, More Obvious Fluorescein Angiographic Signs, and Macular Edema
- •16.2.1 Discussion
- •16.3 Case 16.3: Old Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion with Late Vitreous Hemorrhage and Hyphema
- •16.3.1 Discussion
- •16.4 Case 16.4: Spontaneous Improvement of a Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.4.1 Discussion
- •16.5 Case 16.5: Conversion of a Nonischemic Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion to an Ischemic One
- •16.5.1 Discussion
- •16.6 Case 16.6: Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.6.1 Discussion
- •16.7 Case 16.7: Differentiating Central Retinal Vein Occlusion from the Ischemic Ocular Syndrome
- •16.7.1 Discussion
- •16.8 Case 16.8: Late Development of Neovascularization Elsewhere After Ischemic Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.8.1 Discussion
- •16.9 Case 16.9: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Secondary Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •16.9.1 Discussion
- •16.10 Case 16.10: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema or Asymmetric Diabetic Retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema?
- •16.10.1 Discussion
- •16.11 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Index
11.5 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion |
257 |
11.5Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
When ASNV follows ischemic CRVO, the extent of capillary nonperfusion is correlated with the level of aqueous VEGF.19 ASNV develops when aqueous VEGF concentrations reach the range 849–1,569 pg/ml.9 The threshold for ASNV disappearance after PRP is 378 pg/ml.9 Therefore, a lower concentration of VEGF is necessary for maintenance than for induction of ASNV.9
Anterior segment neovascularization develops only in the ischemic form of CRVO.19 It has been reported to occur after 21–70%, median 33%, (Table 11.4) of cases of ischemic CRVO, a wide range reflecting the poor reproducibility in determining ischemia (see Chap. 8) and the various methods for detecting ASNV.11,17,29,30,32,46,56,83 When ASNV follows CRVO, it occurs at the pupillary
margin in 44%, in the angle in 12%, and at both the pupillary margin and in the angle in 44%.11 Two studies showed that angle neovascularization can develop before pupillary margin neovascularization.11,72 Thus, undilated slit lamp examination and gonioscopy for the first 6 months are indicated in eyes with CRVO and signs of ischemia with lengthened follow-up after 6 months passes and no evidence of ASN.11,72
The time course for development of ASNV has been documented in many studies (Fig. 11.13). In the Central Vein Occlusion Study (CVOS), the median time to development of ASNV was 61 days with a range of 6 days to 8 months. In a large case series from the Wills Eye Hospital, the time of onset of NVI after onset of CRVO was 2 weeks to 2 years with a mean time to NVI of 5 months.46 In a consecutive series of 12 cases developing NVI after acute CRVO, the median time to development was 2 months, range 3 weeks to 7 months.63 In another study, 90% of ASNV developed within
Table 11.4 Reported percentages of central retinal vein occlusions ultimately developing anterior segment neovascularization by ischemic status
Form of ASNV |
Percentage of ischemic CRVOs |
Percentage of all CRVOs developing |
|||||
|
developing this form of ASNV |
this form of ASNV |
|||||
NVG |
5025 |
|
|
1025 |
|
|
|
|
3629 |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
2130 |
|
|
557a |
|
|
|
|
4547 |
|
|
3918 |
|
|
|
|
2046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3211 |
Median = 32% |
|
|
Median = 9% |
|
|
|
3572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2641,50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NVA |
6025,28 |
|
|
1225 |
|
|
|
NVI |
7025,28 |
|
|
1425 |
|
|
|
|
2130 |
|
|
2042 |
|
|
|
|
2046 |
|
|
1671 |
|
|
|
|
3211 |
|
|
1157a |
|
|
|
|
5732 |
|
|
5118 |
|
|
|
|
4547 |
Median = 32% |
|
2163 |
Median = 18% |
|
|
|
2130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASNV anterior segment neovascularization, CRVO central retinal vein occlusion, NVG neovascular glaucoma, NVI neovascularization of the iris, NVA neovascularization of the angle
aDenotes a study of patients of age 54 years or less. Superscripts are references for cited percentages
258 |
11 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion |
|
80 |
|
70 |
developing in % |
50 60 |
chance of |
40 |
Cumulative |
30 |
|
20 |
|
10 |
|
0 |
Iris NV
Angle NV
NV Glaucoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disc NV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retinal NV |
|
|
|
|
0 |
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
900 |
1000 |
1100 |
1200 |
1300 |
|
|||||||||||||
Time in days
Fig. 11.13 Kaplan–Meier plot of different types of ocular neovascularization developing after ischemic CRVO as defined by Hayreh (Reproduced with permission from Hayreh30)
9 months of acute CRVO.11 Approximately 75% of cases of the various forms of ocular neovascularization following ischemic CRVO will develop by 3 months and 85% by 1 year, but the remainder may continue to develop over an additional 2 years. Thus, careful monitoring for ASNV is most critical in the first year after CRVO, but subsequent follow-up of predisposed eyes at less frequent intervals is also necessary.23,31
At all follow-up times, the order of frequency of the various manifestations of ASNV after ischemic CRVO is NVG < NVA < NVI (see Tables 9.2 and 11.4). Thus, not every patient with ASNV goes on to develop NVG. The percentage of eyes with ASNV after CRVO not developing NVG has been reported to be 33% of all eyes with NVI and 22% to 25% of all eyes with either NVI or NVA.18,25
The Problem of Undetected Anterior Segment Neovascularization After Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
It is recommended that patients have undilated slit lamp examinations and gonioscopy after CRVO to detect ASNV.11,22 Nevertheless, evidence suggests that perhaps two-thirds of ophthalmologists omit undilated slit lamp examination or gonioscopy after CRVO.11 Experience in seeing patients with CRVO has little to do with actual management practice in following CRVO. Clinicians who see more patients with CRVO omit screening undilated slit lamp examination
11.5 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion |
259 |
and gonioscopy as often as clinicians seeing few patients with CRVO.11 The possible explanations for this departure from preferred practice may be ignorance of the importance of these practices or financial disincentives. To examine a patient before dilation and then again after dilation interrupts the typical flow of a patient especially in the clinic of a retina specialist, where many of the patients with CRVO are followed and probably represents an obstacle to realization of preferred practice.11
The results of the SCORE CRVO and SCORE BRVO studies suggest that the problem is widespread. In the SCORE CRVO study, the 36-month incidences of NVI and NVG were 3.2% and 5.8%, respectively. That is, counterintuitively, more cases of NVG were found than cases of NVI, implying that NVI was undetected in some cases. Similarly, in the SCORE BRVO study, the 36-month incidences of NVI and NVG were 0.3% and 2.2%, respectively. Again, intuition suggests that one should find more cases of NVI than of NVG raising the question whether cases of NVI were missed.13
ASNV occurred in 35% of eyes categorized at baseline as ischemic or indeterminate and 10% of eyes categorized as nonischemic using FA criteria alone.46 Looked at from a different perspective, 49% of eyes with CRVO that progressed to NVI had a baseline FA classified as nonischemic, 31% as ischemic, and 20% as indeterminate.46 Thus, a nonischemic categorization of an eye with CRVO is not a basis for complacence on checking for subsequent ASNV.71 Likewise, the risk of NVG in CRVOs classified as nonischemic at diagnosis was 1%. One infers that eyes classified as nonischemic CRVOs at baseline that later develop NVG had to have converted to ischemic CRVOs at some unobserved point.47 Thirty-three percent of eyes beginning as nonischemic CRVOs that later convert to ischemic CRVOs eventually develop NVG.29
Predicting development of NVI after CRVO has been the goal of many studies.33 The relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) gives useful prognostic information throughout the disease course and is uninfluenced by the degree of intraretinal hemorrhage.25 In one series, no eye developed ASNV without a RAPD of 1.2 log units or greater.62 The extent of capillary nonperfusion present on FA has also been useful, when the angiogram is interpretable. The greater the baseline area of capillary nonperfusion, the higher the risk of ASNV.12 The risk of ASNV is
16% when 11–29 disc areas (DAs) of capillary nonperfusion are present and 52% when 75 or more DAs of capillary nonperfusion are present.70 For eyes with CRVO of duration less than 1 month, the baseline VA contains all the predictive information relative to subsequent risk of ASNV.71 For a doubling of the baseline visual angle, the risk of subsequent ASNV increases by a factor of 1.7.71
Patients developing NVG generally
•Have a shorter duration of symptoms
•Are older
•Are more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and POAG
•Are more likely to have moderate-to-severe venous tortuosity
•Are more likely to have a ratio of electroretinogram b-wave amplitude in the involved eye to fellow eye less than 0.7 than patients not developing NVG, although there is some inconsistency across studies in these factors.11,18,46,63,69,71,76 Patients developing ASNV have not been found to differ in systemic associations compared to patients not developing ASNV.36,57
Iris fluorescein angiography has been examined as a predictor of later NVI.43 Normal iris vessels become leaky after ischemic CRVO and before development of NVI.40 The best predictor
260 11 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion
Table 11.5 Associations of laboratory abnormalities with anterior segment neovascularization after central retinal vein occlusion
Laboratory variable |
Level in patients developing NVI |
Level in patients not developing NVI |
P |
|||
Factor VII (IU/dl) |
95.7 |
± 16.3 |
125.8 |
± 20.8 |
0.005 |
|
Antithrombin (IU/dl) |
92.8 |
± 12.1 |
107.4 |
± |
9.9 |
0.04 |
TPA (ng/ml) |
4.62 |
± 2.0 |
7.25 |
± |
2.5 |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data from Williamson81
IU international units, DL deciliters, NG nanograms, ML milliliter, TPA tissue plasminogen activator
from baseline iris FA was relative area of iris late fluorescein staining, but the specificity of the test was too poor, and few have adopted iris fluorescein angiography for this purpose.43
Central retinal venous blood flow velocity has been used to predict the later development of NVI.82 In patients examined within 3 months of onset of CRVO, a cutoff point exists that detects later NVI with 76% sensitivity and 86% specificity.82 Few clinicians have access to such technology, making its use for such a purpose unlikely in actual practice.
Associations of ASNV after CRVO with certain laboratory tests have also been found (Table 11.5). The result for factor VII is paradoxical to intuition, as factor VII is a procoagulant protein. The results for antithrombin III and TPA are intuitive as ATIII is an anticoagulant and TPA is profibrinolytic.
Presence of optic disc collateral vessels is predictive that ASNV will not develop.20 Eyes developing ASNV were one twenty-fifth as likely to have optic disc collateral vessels as eyes not developing ASNV.20 Presumably, optic disc collaterals confer some protection against ischemia. A lesser protective factor against development of ASNV in one study was macular lipid.11 The biological plausibility of this purported association is more suspect.
The prevalence of NVI after CRVO does not depend on the status of the vitreous. In a case series of 52 eyes with ischemic CRVO, 38 had a complete PVD and 14 did not. Of the 38 with complete PVD, 22% went on to develop NVI compared to 21% without complete PVD.32 Treatment of macular edema in CRVO with intravitreal triamcinolone did not reduce the incidence of ASNV in the SCORE CRVO study.12
Untreated eyes developing NVG after CRVO go on to blindness in 76% and 28% go on to phthisis bulbi.23 Because a high proportion of eyes developing ASNV go on to develop NVG, most clinicians treat all cases of ASNV after CRVO. A minority disagree with this approach on grounds that this commits some patients not destined to NVG to iatrogenic field loss from laser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP).
The standard treatment for anterior segment neovascularization is PRP.9,18,45,46,72 Because ASNV can progress rapidly from the open-angle stage to the closed-angle stage, PRP should be applied promptly after diagnosis of ASNV.23,46 When the view is inadequate, cryotherapy can be used, but is not the first choice because it is associated with greater inflammation and more pain during treatment. For short-term regression of anterior segment neovascularization, intravitreal or intracameral injection of bevacizumab is effective and can cause rapid regression of new vessels, reduction in intraocular pressure, and clearing of corneal edema, which can allow the more permanent measure of PRP to be applied successfully.8
There is a good correlation between the effectiveness of laser PRP in causing regression in NVI and in causing a reduction of the aqueous concentration of VEGF.9 In one series, eyes with NVI following CRVO had a median aqueous VEGF concentration of 1,201 pg/ml. Following laser PRP with successful regression of NVI, the median aqueous VEGF concentration was 204 pg/ml. Those with persistence of NVI despite laser PRP had median aqueous VEGF of 1,295 pg/ml.9
