- •Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •1.1 Anatomy and Histology
- •1.2 Microanatomy of the Retina
- •1.3 Vascular Anatomy
- •Bernoulli’s Principle and Deductions Concerning Changes in Central Retinal Vein Diameter at the Lamina Cribrosa
- •1.4 Pathologic Anatomy
- •1.4.1 Abnormalities of the Vessel Wall
- •1.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •2.1 Abnormalities of the Blood
- •2.1.1 Thrombosis
- •2.1.2 Viscosity of Blood
- •2.2 Abnormalities of Blood Flow
- •2.2.1 Retinal Vascular Hemodynamics
- •2.2.1.1 Laplace’s Law
- •2.2.1.2 Poiseuille’s Law
- •A Misapplication of Poiseuille’s Law
- •2.2.1.3 Hemodynamics of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •How Severe Must Central Venous Obstruction Be to Produce Symptoms?
- •The Central Retinal Artery in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.2.1.4 Hemodynamics of BRVO
- •2.3 Macular Edema
- •2.3.1 Macular Anatomy and Its Relationship to Macular Edema in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.3.2 Starling’s Law
- •2.3.3 The Retinal Pigment Epithelial Pump
- •2.3.4 Molecular Signaling in Macular Edema
- •Relevant Molecular Biologic Terminology
- •2.3.4.1 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- •2.3.4.2 Other Retinal Cytokines with Lesser Roles
- •2.3.4.3 Molecular Signaling in BRVO
- •2.3.4.4 Molecular Signaling in CRVO
- •What Does the Response of RVO to Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs Say About Pathophysiology?
- •2.4 Retinal Neovascularization
- •Spontaneous Venous Pulsations and CRVO
- •2.7 Animal Models of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.7.1 Animal Models of BRVO
- •2.7.2 Animal Models of CRVO
- •2.8 Summary of Key Points
- •2.9 Future Directions
- •References
- •3.1 Background for Clinical Genetics
- •3.2 The Role of Polymorphisms in Genetic Studies
- •3.3 Types of Genetic Study Design
- •Why Are So Many Association Studies for Retinal Vein Occlusion Negative?
- •3.4 Studies of the Genetics of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.1 Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor Genes
- •3.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.3 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.4 202210G > A Mutation of the Prothrombin Gene (Factor II Leiden)
- •3.4.6 Protein C
- •3.4.7 Protein S
- •3.4.8 Fibrinogen
- •3.4.9 Factor XII
- •3.4.12 Other Negative Genetic Association Studies
- •3.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •4.1 Nosology of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Nonischemic and Ischemic Hemispheres
- •4.3.1 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Forms of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Quantifying Risk
- •The Major Epidemiologic Studies of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2 Prevalence
- •5.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3 Incidence
- •5.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4 Risk and Protective Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2 Gender
- •5.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.3 CRVO
- •5.4.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.4.3 Race
- •5.4.4 Laterality
- •5.4.5 Body Mass Index
- •5.4.6 Education
- •5.4.7 Physical Activity
- •5.4.8 Miscellaneous Factors Explored and Not Found Important
- •5.5.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.6 Life Expectancy
- •5.7 Visual Impact of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Systemic Associations
- •6.2.1 Hypertension
- •6.2.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2 Diabetes Mellitus
- •6.2.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3 Hyperlipidemia
- •6.2.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4 Cardiovascular Disease
- •6.2.4.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.4 Stroke
- •6.2.4.5 Carotid Artery Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease
- •6.2.5 Rheologic and Hematologic Abnormalities
- •6.2.6 Coagulation Abnormalities
- •6.2.6.1 Antiphospholipid Antibodies
- •6.2.6.2 Factor VII
- •6.2.6.3 Factor VIII
- •6.2.6.4 Lipoprotein a
- •6.2.6.5 Von Willebrand Factor
- •6.2.6.6 Other Coagulation Factors
- •6.2.7 Hyperhomocysteinemia
- •6.2.7.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.8 Serum Folate
- •6.2.9 Serum B12
- •6.2.10 Smoking
- •6.2.11 Alcohol Consumption
- •6.2.14 No Underlying Vascular Risk Factor
- •6.3 Ocular Associations
- •6.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.4 Practical Recommendations About the Systemic Workup of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •History of the Standard Workup for Systemic Associations in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.5 Retinal Vein Occlusion and Cardiovascular Disease Risk
- •6.6 Differences in Systemic Associations Between Ischemic and Nonischemic CRVOs
- •6.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •7.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.1.1 Acute Phase
- •7.1.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.1.3 Chronic Phase
- •7.1.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •Why Does the Visual Outcome in Nonischemic, Macula-Involving Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions Usually Vary with the Size of the Involved Retina?
- •7.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.2.1 Acute Phase
- •7.2.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.2.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •When Retinal Venous Congestion and Optic Disc Edema Are Not Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •What Is the Relationship of Central Retinal Artery Pressure and Cilioretinal Artery Pressure?
- •Retinal Whitening Does Not Equal Infarction
- •A Clinical Picture Predicted by a Hypothesis
- •7.2.1.3 Visual Acuity
- •7.2.2 Chronic Phase
- •Why Are Optic Disc Collaterals Associated with Worse Initial and Final Visual Acuity After CRVO?
- •7.2.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •7.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Which Measure of Reproducibility Is Best?
- •8.1 Color Fundus Photography
- •8.2 Fluorescein Angiography
- •8.2.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.3 Optical Coherence Tomography and the Retinal Thickness Analyzer
- •Methods of Analysis of OCT in RVO
- •8.4 Visual Field Testing
- •8.5 Electroretinography
- •Electroretinography Essentials for Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •8.5.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.6 Indocyanine Green Angiography
- •8.7 Color Doppler Ultrasonographic Imaging
- •8.8 Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.9 Ophthalmodynamometry
- •8.10 Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.11 Laser Interferometry to Measure Pulsatile Choroidal Blood Flow
- •8.12 Vitreous Fluorophotometry
- •8.13 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •9.1 Terminology
- •9.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.1 Clinical Characteristics
- •In the Face of Evidence that Fluorescein Angiography Is Poorly Predictive of Ischemia in Acute Central Retinal Vein Occlusion, Why Is It Widely Used?
- •9.3.2 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.3 Outcomes by Ischemic Status
- •9.4 Interaction of Ischemia with Effects of Treatments
- •9.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •10.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.4 Treatment of Posterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •11.1 The Pathoanatomy and Pathophysiology of Iris and Angle Neovascularization
- •11.2 Clinical Picture of Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •11.4 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.5 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •The Problem of Undetected Anterior Segment Neovascularization After Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Why Is Anterior Segment Neovascularization Less Common in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Than in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion?
- •11.6 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •12.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.3 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Visual Acuity Measurement in Treatment Studies
- •OCT Measurement of Macular Thickness in Treatment Studies
- •13.1 Medical Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.1.1 Anticoagulation
- •13.1.2 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •13.1.3 Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •Recipe for Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •13.1.4 Plasmapheresis
- •13.2 Treatment of Previously Unsuspected Risk Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.3.1 Treatments for Macular Edema
- •Relative Corticosteroid Potencies
- •13.3.2 Treatments for Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.4 Results of Clinical Studies of Treatments for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •13.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.1.1 Grid Laser
- •13.4.1.2 Subthreshold Grid Laser Treatment
- •13.4.1.3 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation
- •13.4.1.5 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone
- •13.4.1.6 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.1.7 Combination Treatments Involving Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injections
- •13.4.1.8 Arteriovenous Sheathotomy
- •13.4.1.9 Vitrectomy
- •13.4.1.10 Intravitreal Injection of Autologous Plasmin
- •13.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.2.2 Combination Regimen: Bevacizumab, Panretinal Laser, and Grid Laser
- •13.4.2.3 Systemic Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.4 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone Injection
- •13.4.2.5 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.6 Vitrectomy
- •13.5 Treatment of Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.5.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Retinal and Disc Neovascularization After Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.5.2 Vitrectomy for Intraocular Neovascularization with Vitreous Hemorrhage
- •13.5.3 Laser Panretinal Photocoagulation for Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •13.6 Economic Considerations
- •13.7 Future Directions
- •13.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •14.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions in the Young
- •14.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.4 Workup in the Younger Patient with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •14.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •15.1 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Serous Retinal Detachment in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.2 Laser Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.1.3 Intravenous Infusion of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.4 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.5 Macular Puncture for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.1 Grid Laser for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.2 Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2.3 Radial Optic Neurotomy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.4 Retinal Endovascular Surgery with Intravenous Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.5 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.6 Intravitreal Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Triamcinolone
- •15.2.7 Systemic Acetazolamide for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with ME
- •15.2.8 Combined Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •15.2.9 Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression
- •15.2.10 Section of the Posterior Scleral Ring
- •15.2.11 Infusion of High Molecular Weight Dextran
- •15.3 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for HCRVO
- •15.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •16.1 Case 16.1: An Asymptomatic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Asymmetric Hemispheric Involvement
- •16.1.1 Discussion
- •16.2 Case 16.2: Chronic Macular Branch Vein Occlusion with Subtle Ophthalmoscopic Signs, More Obvious Fluorescein Angiographic Signs, and Macular Edema
- •16.2.1 Discussion
- •16.3 Case 16.3: Old Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion with Late Vitreous Hemorrhage and Hyphema
- •16.3.1 Discussion
- •16.4 Case 16.4: Spontaneous Improvement of a Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.4.1 Discussion
- •16.5 Case 16.5: Conversion of a Nonischemic Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion to an Ischemic One
- •16.5.1 Discussion
- •16.6 Case 16.6: Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.6.1 Discussion
- •16.7 Case 16.7: Differentiating Central Retinal Vein Occlusion from the Ischemic Ocular Syndrome
- •16.7.1 Discussion
- •16.8 Case 16.8: Late Development of Neovascularization Elsewhere After Ischemic Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.8.1 Discussion
- •16.9 Case 16.9: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Secondary Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •16.9.1 Discussion
- •16.10 Case 16.10: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema or Asymmetric Diabetic Retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema?
- •16.10.1 Discussion
- •16.11 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Index
8.5 Electroretinography |
211 |
nonischemic CRVO, Þxation was stable in only 1 of 12 patients (8%), and Þxation was predominantly central in only 2 of 12 patients (17%). With improvement of macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone injection, both Þxation location and stability improved.86 Scanning laser perimetry and microperimetry are research techniques not used in clinical care of RVO.86
8.5 Electroretinography
Electroretinography (ERG) measures the electrical responses of different cell types within the retina to standardized light stimuli. In RVOs,
ERG provides functional information that complements the morphologic information contained in OCT images and ßuorescein angiography. Techniques used include standard full-Þeld ERG and multifocal ERG (mfERG).18,19,25,44,88,98 One advantage of the ERG over a different functional test, the relative afferent pupillary defect, is that it does not depend on having a normal fellow eye.39 ERG and mfERG are not widely available, are not part of the clinicianÕs regular workup of patients with RVO, and, if available, are timeconsuming, especially if dark adaptation for scotopic testing is done.62 The results of ERG testing vary from one center to another despite attempts at international standards, and published results may not be generalizable.10
Electroretinography Essentials for Retinal Vein Occlusions
In standard ERG, the retina is stimulated by light from a Ganzfeld bowl while recordings are made from one electrode embedded in a contact lens placed on the cornea and another stuck to the skin near the eye. Recordings are made under conditions of dark adaptation and light adaptation. Single-ßash recordings are made as well as responses to a 30-Hz ßicker stimulus. Implicit times are measured from the ßash to the part of the waveform being measured.102
The a-wave is mediated by the photoreceptors with some postreceptor modulation (Fig. 8.7).47 The b-wave is generated from bipolar cells of the inner nuclear layer and is expected to be diminished more in ischemic CRVOs (Fig. 8.7).19,47 The oscillatory potentials reßect activity of the inner retina, which would be expected to be affected by decreased perfusion of the retinal veins in RVO.44 The photopic negative response (PhNR) follows the b-wave and originates from the inner retina as do the oscillatory potentials and ßicker fusion signals.19 This response is best elicited by red ßashes against a blue background but can be elicited less prominently with white ßashes as well.19 In the mfERG, the P1 response reßects the activity of bipolar and Muller cells of the middle retina.57
To determine retinal sensitivity, the dark-adapted single-ßash ERG is recorded in response to different stimulus light intensities. The number of light stimuli used can affect the results obtained. Nine stimuli are thought to be enough to allow accurate curve Þtting of the NakaÐ Rushton function (Fig. 8.8).102 The ERG amplitude from the a-wave trough to b-wave peak (R) is plotted against stimulus intensity I and the data Þt by the NakaÐRushton function.
R = Rmax á In/(In + Kn). Rmax is a measure of the loss of cells in the retina.102 K is a Þtting parameter that equals the intensity required to produce half the maximal response. It is there-
fore a measure of retinal sensitivity.102 n is the slope of the Þtting function and is a measure of the homogeneity of retinal sensitivity.102
There are considerable variations in ERG testing conditions such as stimulus luminances used across laboratories, although international standards have been set to reduce this problem. The variability across laboratories makes generalization of published data of questionable reliability.53 In mfERG, the stimulus is a hexagonal pattern of light and dark areas that stimulates small separate regions of the macula. The readings are tied to the regions that generate them and
presented as a map of voltage amplitudes that overlays the macula.
212 |
8 Ancillary Testing in the Management of Retinal Vein Occlusions |
Fig. 8.7 Typical scotopic white-ßash global electroretinogram waveform. The red arrow indicates the a-wave trough. The green arrow indicates the b-wave peak. In central retinal vein occlusion, the b-wave peak diminishes more as the degree of ischemia increases
Voltage ( v)
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
R = Rmax In/(In + Kn) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
v) |
400 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
( |
|
|
|
amplitude |
300 |
|
1/2 Rmax |
Response |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
500
250
0
−250
−500
−750
0 |
50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
Time (ms)
Rmax
Log K
−4 |
−3 |
−2 |
−1 |
0 |
Log intensity (ms)
Fig. 8.8 Plot of response amplitude (amplitude of the b-wave) versus logarithm of the stimulus intensity for the scotopic, white-ßash electroretinogram. Each data point represents a measurement in which stimulus intensity is changed and the b-wave amplitude response is measured. Rmax is the maximal response
amplitude in microvolts. Log K is the logarithm of the stimulus intensity at which half the maximal response amplitude is reached. I is the stimulus intensity in candela seconds per square meter. n is an exponent that is chosen to provide the best Þt of the regression curve to the data points
8.5 Electroretinography |
213 |
There are many outcome measures that can be chosen with standard mfERG. Mean P1 amplitude of the central seven hexagons has been used to compare the effect of arteriovenous sheathotomy on the central macular function of patients with BRVO and macular edema.21 Multifocal oscillatory potentials were lost in areas of nonperfused retina in a study of three patients with central or branch vein occusion.88 Loss of mfERG response amplitude correlated with sensitivity loss on perimetry in patients with BRVO.98
8.5.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
The full-Þeld electroretinogram usually remains normal after BRVO.34 The oscillatory potential that can be extracted from ERG recordings, however, is affected. The summed difference of components of the oscillatory potential (termed O1, O2, O3, and O4) was different in eyes with BRVO compared to the normal fellow eyes.34 The photopic negative response (phNR) has been reported to be reduced in BRVO.19 In the mfERG, reduced amplitudes and increased latencies have been reported in the affected retinal quadrants.44
8.5.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Decreased amplitudes of the ERG have been equated with cell death in the inner retina.63 Changes in the b-wave are seen in CRVO, as predicted from the physiology. For both photopic and scotopic ERG, b-wave amplitude of 60% of normal or less or reduced by one or more standard deviations from normal had an 80Ð90% sensitivity and 71Ð80% speciÞcity to detect ischemic CRVO in one study.39 Paradoxically, however, changes in the a-wave are sometimes seen as well. How CRVO might affect ERG variables related to outer retinal cells is speculative because the outer retina receives oxygen from the choroid, which should not differ in CRVO from normal. Johnson and colleagues suggested that inner
retinal hypoxia leads to greater diffusion of oxygen from outer to inner retina with adverse effects on the sodiumÐpotassium pump of the rods.48
The ERG has been studied most in CRVO in relation to predicting subsequent neovascularization of the iris (NVI). The ERG in ischemic CRVO changes over time.63 The optimal time to perform an ERG with the goal of predicting later NVI has been suggested to be 3 weeks.63 There is controversy regarding which ERG variable is most useful in this regard.19,102 Scotopic and photopic b-/a-wave amplitude ratios have inconsistently been reported to be useful prognostic indicators. One study reported that Þve of eight patients with CRVO who developed NVI had scotopic b-/a-amplitude ratios less than one, but another found this ratio insensitive, as only one of nine patients who had or later developed NVI had this characteristic.48,82 Kaye and Harding reported that scotopic b-/a-wave amplitude ratio was useful as a predictor of later NVI. Eyes that later developed rubeosis had a mean ratio of 1.28±SD0.22 compared to 1.80±SD0.24 for the unaffected fellow eyes (P<0.001).53,82
Other aspects of the ERG have been found useful for later prediction of NVI. In one study, the b-wave amplitude was smaller in eyes that later developed NVI.53 The mean intereye difference in b-wave amplitude was 102±SD47 mV. Of greater predictive power was the b-wave implicit time, which was prolonged in the eyes that later developed NVI. The mean intereye difference in b-wave implicit time was 9.6 ms (95% CI 7.4Ð11.8 ms).53 By testing over a range of luminances, the authors concluded that a b-wave implicit time of greater than 47.2 ms or an intereye difference of greater than 7.4 ms was strongly associated with later NVI.53 The PhNR response was found to be the most sensitive predictor of NVI in another study.19
In yet another study, a mean cone implicit time of 35.0 ms or more was 88% sensitive and 100% speciÞc for detecting eventual NVI and was suggested as the most useful ERG variable for predicting later NVI.56 In a study of 15 patients with CRVO, 9 of whom had or later developed NVI and 6 of whom did not, log K was the most sensitive for discriminating the eyes developing NVI from those not developing NVI. Using a forced
