- •Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •1.1 Anatomy and Histology
- •1.2 Microanatomy of the Retina
- •1.3 Vascular Anatomy
- •Bernoulli’s Principle and Deductions Concerning Changes in Central Retinal Vein Diameter at the Lamina Cribrosa
- •1.4 Pathologic Anatomy
- •1.4.1 Abnormalities of the Vessel Wall
- •1.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.4.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •1.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •2.1 Abnormalities of the Blood
- •2.1.1 Thrombosis
- •2.1.2 Viscosity of Blood
- •2.2 Abnormalities of Blood Flow
- •2.2.1 Retinal Vascular Hemodynamics
- •2.2.1.1 Laplace’s Law
- •2.2.1.2 Poiseuille’s Law
- •A Misapplication of Poiseuille’s Law
- •2.2.1.3 Hemodynamics of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •How Severe Must Central Venous Obstruction Be to Produce Symptoms?
- •The Central Retinal Artery in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.2.1.4 Hemodynamics of BRVO
- •2.3 Macular Edema
- •2.3.1 Macular Anatomy and Its Relationship to Macular Edema in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.3.2 Starling’s Law
- •2.3.3 The Retinal Pigment Epithelial Pump
- •2.3.4 Molecular Signaling in Macular Edema
- •Relevant Molecular Biologic Terminology
- •2.3.4.1 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
- •2.3.4.2 Other Retinal Cytokines with Lesser Roles
- •2.3.4.3 Molecular Signaling in BRVO
- •2.3.4.4 Molecular Signaling in CRVO
- •What Does the Response of RVO to Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs Say About Pathophysiology?
- •2.4 Retinal Neovascularization
- •Spontaneous Venous Pulsations and CRVO
- •2.7 Animal Models of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •2.7.1 Animal Models of BRVO
- •2.7.2 Animal Models of CRVO
- •2.8 Summary of Key Points
- •2.9 Future Directions
- •References
- •3.1 Background for Clinical Genetics
- •3.2 The Role of Polymorphisms in Genetic Studies
- •3.3 Types of Genetic Study Design
- •Why Are So Many Association Studies for Retinal Vein Occlusion Negative?
- •3.4 Studies of the Genetics of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.1 Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor Genes
- •3.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.2.3 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •3.4.4 202210G > A Mutation of the Prothrombin Gene (Factor II Leiden)
- •3.4.6 Protein C
- •3.4.7 Protein S
- •3.4.8 Fibrinogen
- •3.4.9 Factor XII
- •3.4.12 Other Negative Genetic Association Studies
- •3.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •4.1 Nosology of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Nonischemic and Ischemic Hemispheres
- •4.3.1 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Forms of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •4.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Quantifying Risk
- •The Major Epidemiologic Studies of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2 Prevalence
- •5.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3 Incidence
- •5.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4 Risk and Protective Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.1.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2 Gender
- •5.4.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.4.2.3 CRVO
- •5.4.2.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.4.3 Race
- •5.4.4 Laterality
- •5.4.5 Body Mass Index
- •5.4.6 Education
- •5.4.7 Physical Activity
- •5.4.8 Miscellaneous Factors Explored and Not Found Important
- •5.5.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.5.4 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •5.6 Life Expectancy
- •5.7 Visual Impact of Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •5.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Systemic Associations
- •6.2.1 Hypertension
- •6.2.1.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.1.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.1.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2 Diabetes Mellitus
- •6.2.2.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.2.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3 Hyperlipidemia
- •6.2.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •6.2.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4 Cardiovascular Disease
- •6.2.4.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.4.4 Stroke
- •6.2.4.5 Carotid Artery Disease and Peripheral Vascular Disease
- •6.2.5 Rheologic and Hematologic Abnormalities
- •6.2.6 Coagulation Abnormalities
- •6.2.6.1 Antiphospholipid Antibodies
- •6.2.6.2 Factor VII
- •6.2.6.3 Factor VIII
- •6.2.6.4 Lipoprotein a
- •6.2.6.5 Von Willebrand Factor
- •6.2.6.6 Other Coagulation Factors
- •6.2.7 Hyperhomocysteinemia
- •6.2.7.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.7.3 Central and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.2.8 Serum Folate
- •6.2.9 Serum B12
- •6.2.10 Smoking
- •6.2.11 Alcohol Consumption
- •6.2.14 No Underlying Vascular Risk Factor
- •6.3 Ocular Associations
- •6.3.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.3.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.4 Practical Recommendations About the Systemic Workup of Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •History of the Standard Workup for Systemic Associations in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •6.5 Retinal Vein Occlusion and Cardiovascular Disease Risk
- •6.6 Differences in Systemic Associations Between Ischemic and Nonischemic CRVOs
- •6.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •7.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.1.1 Acute Phase
- •7.1.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.1.3 Chronic Phase
- •7.1.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.1.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •Why Does the Visual Outcome in Nonischemic, Macula-Involving Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions Usually Vary with the Size of the Involved Retina?
- •7.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.2.1 Acute Phase
- •7.2.1.1 Symptoms
- •7.2.1.2 Clinical Signs
- •When Retinal Venous Congestion and Optic Disc Edema Are Not Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •What Is the Relationship of Central Retinal Artery Pressure and Cilioretinal Artery Pressure?
- •Retinal Whitening Does Not Equal Infarction
- •A Clinical Picture Predicted by a Hypothesis
- •7.2.1.3 Visual Acuity
- •7.2.2 Chronic Phase
- •Why Are Optic Disc Collaterals Associated with Worse Initial and Final Visual Acuity After CRVO?
- •7.2.2.1 Visual Acuity
- •7.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •7.3.1 Clinical Signs
- •7.3.2 Visual Acuity
- •7.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Which Measure of Reproducibility Is Best?
- •8.1 Color Fundus Photography
- •8.2 Fluorescein Angiography
- •8.2.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.2.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.3 Optical Coherence Tomography and the Retinal Thickness Analyzer
- •Methods of Analysis of OCT in RVO
- •8.4 Visual Field Testing
- •8.5 Electroretinography
- •Electroretinography Essentials for Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •8.5.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.5.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •8.6 Indocyanine Green Angiography
- •8.7 Color Doppler Ultrasonographic Imaging
- •8.8 Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.9 Ophthalmodynamometry
- •8.10 Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry
- •8.11 Laser Interferometry to Measure Pulsatile Choroidal Blood Flow
- •8.12 Vitreous Fluorophotometry
- •8.13 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •9.1 Terminology
- •9.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.1 Clinical Characteristics
- •In the Face of Evidence that Fluorescein Angiography Is Poorly Predictive of Ischemia in Acute Central Retinal Vein Occlusion, Why Is It Widely Used?
- •9.3.2 Conversion from Nonischemic to Ischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.3.3 Outcomes by Ischemic Status
- •9.4 Interaction of Ischemia with Effects of Treatments
- •9.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •9.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •10.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.3 Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.4 Treatment of Posterior Segment Neovascularization in Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •10.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •11.1 The Pathoanatomy and Pathophysiology of Iris and Angle Neovascularization
- •11.2 Clinical Picture of Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •11.4 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.5 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •The Problem of Undetected Anterior Segment Neovascularization After Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •Why Is Anterior Segment Neovascularization Less Common in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Than in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion?
- •11.6 Anterior Segment Neovascularization in Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •11.7 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •12.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •12.3 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Visual Acuity Measurement in Treatment Studies
- •OCT Measurement of Macular Thickness in Treatment Studies
- •13.1 Medical Treatment of Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.1.1 Anticoagulation
- •13.1.2 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •13.1.3 Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •Recipe for Isovolumic Hemodilution
- •13.1.4 Plasmapheresis
- •13.2 Treatment of Previously Unsuspected Risk Factors for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.3.1 Treatments for Macular Edema
- •Relative Corticosteroid Potencies
- •13.3.2 Treatments for Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.4 Results of Clinical Studies of Treatments for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusions
- •13.4.1 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.1.1 Grid Laser
- •13.4.1.2 Subthreshold Grid Laser Treatment
- •13.4.1.3 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation
- •13.4.1.5 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone
- •13.4.1.6 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.1.7 Combination Treatments Involving Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injections
- •13.4.1.8 Arteriovenous Sheathotomy
- •13.4.1.9 Vitrectomy
- •13.4.1.10 Intravitreal Injection of Autologous Plasmin
- •13.4.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.4.2.2 Combination Regimen: Bevacizumab, Panretinal Laser, and Grid Laser
- •13.4.2.3 Systemic Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.4 Posterior Subtenon’s Triamcinolone Injection
- •13.4.2.5 Intravitreal Corticosteroids
- •13.4.2.6 Vitrectomy
- •13.5 Treatment of Intraocular Neovascularization
- •13.5.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Retinal and Disc Neovascularization After Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •13.5.2 Vitrectomy for Intraocular Neovascularization with Vitreous Hemorrhage
- •13.5.3 Laser Panretinal Photocoagulation for Anterior Segment Neovascularization
- •13.6 Economic Considerations
- •13.7 Future Directions
- •13.8 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •14.1 Pooled Retinal Vein Occlusions in the Young
- •14.2 Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.3 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Patients
- •14.4 Workup in the Younger Patient with Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •14.5 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •15.1 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.1 Sector Panretinal Laser Photocoagulation for Serous Retinal Detachment in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.1.2 Laser Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.1.3 Intravenous Infusion of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.4 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.1.5 Macular Puncture for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.1 Grid Laser for Macular Edema in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.2 Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema
- •15.2.3 Radial Optic Neurotomy for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •15.2.4 Retinal Endovascular Surgery with Intravenous Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.5 Intravitreal Injection of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
- •15.2.6 Intravitreal Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Triamcinolone
- •15.2.7 Systemic Acetazolamide for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with ME
- •15.2.8 Combined Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •15.2.9 Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression
- •15.2.10 Section of the Posterior Scleral Ring
- •15.2.11 Infusion of High Molecular Weight Dextran
- •15.3 Failed and Unadopted Treatments for HCRVO
- •15.4 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •16.1 Case 16.1: An Asymptomatic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Asymmetric Hemispheric Involvement
- •16.1.1 Discussion
- •16.2 Case 16.2: Chronic Macular Branch Vein Occlusion with Subtle Ophthalmoscopic Signs, More Obvious Fluorescein Angiographic Signs, and Macular Edema
- •16.2.1 Discussion
- •16.3 Case 16.3: Old Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion with Late Vitreous Hemorrhage and Hyphema
- •16.3.1 Discussion
- •16.4 Case 16.4: Spontaneous Improvement of a Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.4.1 Discussion
- •16.5 Case 16.5: Conversion of a Nonischemic Hemicentral Retinal Vein Occlusion to an Ischemic One
- •16.5.1 Discussion
- •16.6 Case 16.6: Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.6.1 Discussion
- •16.7 Case 16.7: Differentiating Central Retinal Vein Occlusion from the Ischemic Ocular Syndrome
- •16.7.1 Discussion
- •16.8 Case 16.8: Late Development of Neovascularization Elsewhere After Ischemic Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •16.8.1 Discussion
- •16.9 Case 16.9: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Secondary Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion
- •16.9.1 Discussion
- •16.10 Case 16.10: Nonischemic Central Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema or Asymmetric Diabetic Retinopathy with Diabetic Macular Edema?
- •16.10.1 Discussion
- •16.11 Summary of Key Points
- •References
- •Index
7.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion |
183 |
optic nerve sheath meningioma, and chronic papilledema, can cause them.38 Once formed, retinochoroidal collaterals tend not go away, although rarely they do. Their diameters and location on the optic disc have been observed to change over years of follow-up.38,108
Anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV) develops in 16Ð70% of ischemic CRVOs.17,36,48,54,5
6,57,61,62,81,82,112,140,146 If ASNV is going to develop, it
usually does so in the Þrst 7 months with an average time of onset of 4 months.57,98 Retinal and disc neovascularizations are less common than ASNV after CRVO, for unknown reasons, and tend to develop later, with median time to occurrence of 12 months.57,98 In the population-based BDES, 18 eyes suffered incident CRVO during 15 years of follow-up. Of these, three (17%) had retinal neovascularization.72 Without treatment, most eyes developing ASNV after ischemic CRVO will develop neovascular glaucoma (see Chap. 11). The risk of neovascular glaucoma developing in
eyes with ischemic CRVO is 23Ð60% over 12Ð15 months.86 The risk in eyes that convert from nonischemic to ischemic CRVO is 33%.56
Four variables have been tested for ability to predict ASNV after CRVO Ð capillary dropout greater than 10 disc areas, initial Snellen visual acuity less than 20/200, implicit time on 30 Hz ßicker fusion electroretinogram greater than 37 ms, and presence or absence of optic disc edema.62 For development of neovascular complications, the presenting variable of highest prognostic import is implicit time on 30 Hz ßicker fusion electroretinogram greater than 37 ms (kappa = 0.69), followed by initial visual acuity less than 20/200 (kappa = 0.60), capillary dropout greater than 10 disc areas (kappa = 0.49), and absence of optic disc edema (kappa = 0.28).62 In another study, predictive factors for occurrence of anterior or posterior neovascularization were male gender (higher risk) and baseline visual acuity (worse confers higher risk).39
Why Are Optic Disc Collaterals Associated with Worse Initial and Final Visual Acuity After CRVO?
A plausible hypothesis for the noted observation, counter to common intuition, has been advanced by Hayreh.56 The severity of CRVO depends on location of the thrombus in the optic nerve. The more anterior the thrombus, the worse the CRVO. If a thrombus occurs more anteriorly in the optic nerve, there are fewer preexisting channels to allow the retinal venous drainage to bypass the clot. Therefore, the preexisting collaterals on the optic disc are the only ones available to serve in that capacity, and they become swollen and clinically obvious. In cases in which optic disc collaterals are not visible clinically, they are by inference present in an unseen location behind the lamina cribrosa. These are cases with more posteriorly located clots which are less severe, have more collaterals between clot and lamina for venous drainage, and have better presenting visual acuities.56
In the late stage, macular atrophic scarring and sheathing of retinal veins can develop (Fig. 7.21). Rarely, choroidal neovascularization can follow CRVO with chronic macular edema.32
7.2.2.1 Visual Acuity
The natural history of CRVO is guarded. After 3 years, 58% of eyes have visual acuity worse than
20/100. Less than 20% of eyes will gain greater than or equal to two lines of visual acuity.139
The visual prognosis depends most predictably on the initial visual acuity.140 The poorer the initial visual acuity, the worse the Þnal visual outcome.140 The prognostic importance of initial visual acuity is greatest when it is obtained within 30 days of the CRVO.140 In the CVOS, the majority of eyes stayed in the visual acuity category
184 |
7 The Clinical Picture and Natural History of Retinal Vein Occlusions |
a |
b |
c |
d |
e
7.2 Central Retinal Vein Occlusion |
|
185 |
|
Table 7.4 Visual prognosis in central retinal vein occlusion by initial visual acuity |
|
||
Initial VA; N |
Final VA ≥ 20/40 (%) |
Final VA 20/50Ð20/200 (%) |
Final VA < 20/200 (%) |
≥ 20/40; 209 |
65 |
25 |
10 |
20/50Ð20/200; 204 |
19 |
44 |
37 |
<20/200; 301 |
1 |
19 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
Data from CVOS140 |
|
|
|
Visual prognosis has also been stratiÞed by level of ischemia, but the results of such analyses are inconsistent. Quinlan and colleagues found no important difference between the outcomes of nonischemic and ischemic eyes in a retrospective study of 157 eyes with CRVO.112 On the other hand, when the ischemic status of CRVO was classiÞed using the strict Hayreh deÞnition, the prognosis for visual acuity varied starkly by class. The odds ratio for greater than or equal to three Snellen line improvement was 2.96 (95% CI 1.55Ð5.66) for nonischemic CRVO relative to ischemic CRVO.56 Others have agreed with Hayreh that the prognosis of ischemic CRVO is worse.45 In a meta-analysis of 53 studies including 3,271 eyes, the pooled mean change in visual acuity was −10 ETDRS letters from baseline to 6 months and −3 ETDRS letters from baseline to 12 months for nonischemic CRVOs.86 For ischemic CRVOs, the mean changes were −15 letters at 6 months and −35 letters at 12 months.86
More often, the controversy concerns whether the prognosis for visual acuity of nonischemic CRVO is good. One study reported that 50% of nonischemic CRVOs would end with visual acuity
worsened until in November 2000, the visual acuity was reduced to 20/30, and he had difÞculty at his job and driving. Note the venous dilation and new tortuosity (compare superotemporal vein at black arrow to the same site in (c)). (e) After laser chorioretinal anastomosis, with successful shunts inferotemporally (the turquoise arrow) and superonasally (not shown), the intraretinal hemorrhages and macular edema resolved. Note the more dilated veins distally than proximally (the black arrow), a sign of a successful shunt. The proximal inferotemporal branch retinal vein is attenuated in the absence of signiÞcant blood ßow (the yellow arrow). Development of a second-eye CRVO led to ascertainment of serum homocysteine which was elevated at 11.6 mmol/l (normal 9.0 mmol/l). He was placed on folate 800 mg/day. In 2008, he suffered a stroke and in 2010 required coronary artery stents for myocardial ischemia
