Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Pickwell's Binocular Vision Anomalies 5th edition_Evans_2007

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
6.78 Mб
Скачать

APPENDICES

Appendix 7 Treatment of amblyopia

The flow chart below is a schematic guide to the treatment of amblyopia (see Ch. 13). The values (e.g. refractive errors and ages) are approximate and other factors (e.g. motivation) should influence decisions. Orthotropic refractive amblyopia can be treated at any age (Ch. 13). If the visual acuity in anisometropia does not improve with spectacles, it might with contact lenses; otherwise patching will be required. Asymptomatic adults with anisometropic amblyopia may prefer not to receive treatment and treatment may be unnecessary unless symptoms or vocational requirements suggest otherwise. For strabismic patients over the age of about 8 years patching is usually contraindicated and any marked change in their refractive correction should be accompanied by instructions to cease wear and return if diplopia occurs. Indeed, any patient with amblyopia who is being treated should be so instructed and should be closely monitored.

Treatment of functional amblyopia

Correct any significant refractive error

18 weeks

If still amblyopic

 

 

Refractive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strabismic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<1.50 D aniso.

 

 

 

>1.50 D aniso.

 

Age < 8 years

 

 

 

Age > 8 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spectacles

 

 

 

Contact lens

 

Patch

 

 

 

No patch

with patch

 

 

 

without patch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or spectacles

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

with patch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

351

APPENDICES

Appendix 8 Worksheet for the investigation of incomitancy (see Ch. 17)

MOTILITY

1. Observation of pupil reflexes:

L

R

E

I

Each pair of stars represents the patient’s

F

G

pair of pupil reflexes in different posi-

T

H

G

T

tions of gaze

 

A

G

Where the pupil reflexes suggest that the

Z

A

visual axes are non-parallel, mark the

E

Z

 

E

deviation of the eye with an arrow

 

 

N.B. recorded as the patient sees it (like visual field), with their left field on the left side of the diagram

2. Cover testing in peripheral gaze:

Write cover test results in peripheral positions of gaze in the relevant box

Make sure that the fixation target is always visible to both eyes

Make sure that the occluder fully occludes

L E F T

G A Z E

R

I

G H T

G A Z E

3. Diplopia:

Draw on the diagram, for each position of

L

gaze, the patient’s perspective of the separa-

E

F

tion of the diplopic image

T

G

 

For example, if in right gaze the patient

A

Z

reports that the their right image is up and

E

to their right of the left eye’s image then

 

record in the relevant box as:

 

R

L

Mark with * where the separation of the images is greatest

R

I

G H T

G A Z E

In this position, the paretic eye’s image is furthest out

Conclusion: Paretic muscle(s):................................................................

Hess screen:

1.Which eye is deviated (which is strabismic in the cover test)? R / L

2.Which is the smaller plot ( paretic eye)? R / L

3.In the paretic eye’s plot, which muscle appears to be underacting the most ( paretic muscle(s))?.......................................................................

Is there overaction of the contralateral synergist? yes / no (if no,

352

rethink; there may be 2 palsies)................................................................

Conclusion: Paretic muscle(s): .......................................

APPENDICES

4.(a) If the paretic eye is the usually deviated eye, then is there contracture (enlarged plot in field of action) of ipsilateral antagonist? yes / no

(b)If the paretic eye is not the usually deviated eye, is there a restriction of the plot in the field of action of the contralateral antagonist? yes / no

5.Are the right and left eye plots a similar size? yes / no

If the answer to 4 (a) or (b) is yes and the answer to 5 is yes, the paresis is likely to be old

Conclusion: old / new / uncertain

If vertically acting muscle may be affected, proceed below:

Maddox

 

Distance

 

 

 

Near

 

rod

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

 

 

Horizontal

Vertical

Vertical

Vertical

Vertical

Vertical

Horizontal

Vertical

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gaze/head Primary

Primary

R gaze

L gaze

R tilt

L tilt

Primary

Primary

tilt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RE fixing (rod LE)

LE fixing (rod RE)

Parks’ three-steps method: (consider R hypodeviation to be L hyperdeviation)

1.

Is it R/L or L/R (from columns b and h)?..................................................

 

R/L: RSO, RIR, LIO, LSR

L/R: RIO, RSR, LSO, LIR

2.

Is the vertical deviation greater in R or L gaze (cols c and d)?................

 

R gaze: RSR, RIR, LIO, LSO

L gaze: RIO, RSO, LSR, LIR

3.

Is the vertical deviation greater with head tilt to R or L (cols e and f)?.......

 

R tilt: RSO, RSR, LIO, LIR

L tilt: RIO, RIR, LSO, LSR

Conclusion: Paretic muscle(s):.....................................................................

Scobee’s method:

1. Is it R/L or L/R (from columns b and h)?.................................................

R/L: RSO, RIR, LIO, LSR L/R: RIO, RSR, LSO, LIR

2.Is the vertical deviation greater at D (primary pos’n (col. b)) or N (adducted (col. h))?..................................................................................

D: RSR, RIR, LSR, LIR

N: RSO, RIO, LSO, LIO

 

3. Which eye is fixating when there is the greatest vertical deviation (cols

 

b and h)?...................................................................................................

 

R: RSR, RIR, RSO, RIO

L: LSR, LIR, LSO, LIO

 

Conclusion: Paretic muscle(s):.....................................................................

353

Left:
RSO (likely) or RSR/ LIO/LIR (unlikely)

APPENDICES

Lindblom’s method:

Patient views a 70 cm horizontal rod at 1 m. If no vertical diplopia, use two Maddox rods (with double Maddox rods, perceived tilt is in direction that affected muscle would rotate eye: 10° suggests one superior oblique muscle likely to be involved, 10° suggests bilateral).

1.

Where is the vertical diplopia greatest?....................................................

 

Up-gaze: RSR, RIO, LSR, LIO

Down-gaze: RIR, RSO, LIR, LSO

2.

Where there is maximum diplopia, are the two images parallel or tor-

 

sional?.......................................................................................................

 

Parallel: RSR, RIR, LSR, LIR

Torsional: RSO, RIO, LSO, LIO

3.

If parallel, does the separation increase on R or L gaze?..........................

 

R: RSR, RIR

L: LSR, LIR

4.

If tilted, does the illusion of tilt increase in up-gaze or down-gaze?..........

 

Up-gaze: RIO, LIO

Down-gaze: RSO, LSO

5.

If tilted, the position of intersection of the two rods points to the

 

paretic eye. Does the intersection of the rods point to the R or L, or is it

 

crossed like an X?......................................................................................

 

R: RSO, RIO

L: LSO, LIO

6.

If crossed, does the tilt angle increase in upward gaze or downward?

 

Up-gaze: bilateral IO paresis

Down-gaze: bilateral SO paresis (very

 

unlikely)

 

Conclusion: Paretic muscle(s):...................................................................

Anomalous head position:

N.B. rarely, this can be paradoxical (i.e. opposite to below)

Head tilt (tipped on one side)

...........degrees [estimate], top tipped to patient’s right / left (delete as appropriate)

Right:

LSO (likely) or LSR/RIO/RIR (unlikely)

Head elevation (chin up or down)

....... ...degrees [estimate], chin: up/down [delete as appropriate]

Up:

Down:

RSR/RIO/LSR/LIO

RSO/LSO (likely) or RIR/ LIR (unlikely)

Head turn (turn to one side)

...........degrees [estimate], nose turned to patient’s: right / left [delete as appropriate]

Right:

Left:

RLR (likely) or

LLR (likely) or

LMR/RSR/RIR/LSO/LIO (unlikely)

RMR/LSR/LIR/RSO/RIO (unlikely)

354

OR Duane’s syndrome

 

APPENDICES

Appendix 9 Investigation of reduced visual acuity from a suspected visual conversion reaction

Health checks : refer if abnormal

If monocular:

Occlude with refractor head

Polarization

Anaglyph

Fogging

If binocular:

Refractive checks

Pinhole

Plano placebo lens

Placebo grey lens

cf. subjective and objective: is patient consistent?

Comparison with opposite of preferred lens

Other tests

Reduce testing distance

Forced choice preferential looking

Kinetic perimetry: ? spiral field

Kinetic perimetry: ‘look at the other stick’

VEPs (? only if VAs 6/24)

355

APPENDICES

Appendix 10 Norms and formulae

Norms

The table below gives norms for orthoptic tests. These norms vary little from age 6–12 years (Jimenez et al 2004b) but values for younger children are given in Appendix 2. Values for the fusional reserves are quoted in prism dioptres and the near test distance is 40 cm. Assuming a normal distribution, 68% of the population lie within 1 standard deviation (SD) of the mean and 98% within 2 SD. Thus, the data in the table can be used to estimate exactly how abnormal are a given set of data. It should be noted that comparing a patient’s performance with the mean and standard deviation of a normal population simply informs the clinician how ‘normal’ the patient is. Being abnormal does not necessarily mean that a person requires treatment.

Variable

Mean

SD

Source

 

 

 

 

Heterophoria ( )

 

 

Goss 1995, p 63

Distance

1 XOP

2

 

Near

3 XOP

5

 

Aligning prism ( on Mallett unit)

 

 

 

Jenkins et al 1989

Pre-presbyopes: 1 or more is abnormal

 

 

Presbyopes: 2 or more is abnormal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distance divergent fusional reserves (

)

 

 

Blur

 

Morgan norms

Break

 

7

3

cited by Goss

Recovery

 

4

2

1995, p 63

 

 

 

 

Distance convergent fusional reserves (

)

 

 

Blur

 

9

4

 

Break

 

19

8

 

Recovery

 

10

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Near divergent fusional reserves (

)

 

 

 

Blur

 

13

4

 

Break

 

21

4

 

Recovery

 

13

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Near convergent fusional reserves (

)

 

 

 

Blur

 

17

5

 

Break

 

21

6

 

Recovery

 

11

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vertical (distance & near; )

 

2–4

 

Pickwell 1989

It is most important that they are

 

 

 

 

balanced (base-up limits similar to

 

 

 

 

base-down)

 

 

 

 

(continued)

356

 

 

 

 

APPENDICES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable

Mean

SD

Source

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NPC: normal range 6–10 cm

 

 

Hayes et al 1998

 

 

 

Accommodation (D)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average amplitude

 

 

Hofstetter, cited

 

 

 

18.5 (0.3 age)

 

 

by Reading 1988

 

 

 

Minimum amplitude

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15.0 (0.25 age)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plus to blur at 40 cm

2.00

0.50

Goss 1995, p 63

 

 

 

Minus to blur at 40 cm

2.37

1.12

 

 

 

 

 

Monocular facility ( 2.00)

11

5

Zellers et al 1984

 

 

 

Binocular facility ( 2.00)

7.7

5

 

 

 

 

 

Lag (MEM)

0.35

0.34

Cooper 1987,

 

 

 

 

 

 

p 444

 

 

 

AC/A (gradient, /D)

4

2

Tassinari 2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Formulae

The formula for calculating the AC/A ratio by the heterophoria distance method is:

AC/A PD (Dist phoria Nr phoria) (Jennings 2001a)

F

where PD is interpupillary distance in cm, F is dioptric distance from distance to near. Exo-deviations are entered as negative values and eso-deviations as positive values.

The formula for converting the NPC in cm to a value for the convergent amplitude at this point in is:

10 PD 2.7 (Goss 1995 page 23) NPC

where PD is interpupillary distance in mm, NPC is near point of convergence in cm.

Prismatic effect for free-space stereograms 2.5 separation of identical points (cm)

357

APPENDICES

Appendix 11 Equipment suppliers

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment

Available from

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bagolini lenses

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

 

 

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bangerter foils

Weco UK (www.weco-uk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bar readers

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bar reading anaglyph (red green)

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

charts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bernell equipment (Bernell-O-scope,

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

aperture rule trainer, Bernell mirror

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

stereoscope, etc.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cardiff acuity test (Keeler Cardiff test)

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PC Hess screen

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eye patches

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flippers

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fresnel prisms

Norville Optical (www.norville.co.uk);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frisby stereo-acuity test

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Glasgow acuity cards (logMAR

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

crowded test)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IFS exercises (see Ethical declaration)

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keeler acuity cards

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lang stereopsis test

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maddox wing

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallett fixation disparity test

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallett foveal suppression test

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallett IPS unit

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallett modified OXO test

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

358

 

 

 

 

(continued)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDICES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment

Available from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallett neutral density filter bar

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Orthoweb

www.academy.org.uk/orthoweb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prism bar

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk);

 

 

 

 

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RAF rule

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

Keeler Instruments (www.keeler.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Randot E stereopsis test

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com);

 

 

 

 

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Test chart 2000

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk);

 

 

 

 

Thomson Software Solutions

 

 

 

 

(www.thomson-software-solutions.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three-cats exercise card

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Titmus stereo-acuity test

Bernell VTP (www.bernell.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TNO stereo-acuity test

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Torsionometer

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translucent occluder (Spielmann)

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk);

 

 

 

 

Haag-Streit UK (www.haagstreituk.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ultra-violet blocking filters

Lee filters (www.leefilters.com)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wilkins intuitive overlays

I.O.O. Sales (www.ioosales.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wilkins intuitive colorimeter and

Cerium Visual Technologies

 

 

 

precision tints

(www.ceriumvistech.co.uk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ethical declaration: The author developed the IFS exercises at the Institute of Optometry, which is a charity. The exercises are marketed by I.O.O. Sales Ltd. which exists to raise funds for the Institute of Optometry. I.O.O. Sales Ltd pays a small ‘award to inventor’ to the author based on sales of the IFS exercises.

359

APPENDICES

Appendix 12 Preparation for professional examinations

Membership of the College of Optometrists

Preregistration period

In 2006, the College of Optometrists changed the format of the preregistration period to include continual assessment throughout the preregistration year with regular visits by college-appointed assessors. Throughout the year, students will have to demonstrate competence in a range of GOC core competencies. Many of these relate to the detection and management of binocular vision anomalies and are summarized in Table A12.1. Table

Table A12.1 Core subjects relating to binocular vision anomalies from the College of Optometrists preregistration period

 

 

 

 

Code

Description

Where in this book to get

 

 

 

 

 

 

more help

 

 

3.1

The ability to make appropriate

Chs 2, 3, 6, 15

 

 

 

 

 

prescribing and management

 

 

 

 

 

 

decisions based on the refractive

 

 

 

 

 

 

and ocular motor status

 

 

 

3.4

The ability to assess children’s visual

Chs 3, 4, Appendix 2

 

 

 

 

 

function using appropriate techniques

 

 

 

5.14

Demonstrate an understanding of

Ch. 3, Appendix 2

 

 

 

 

 

techniques for assessment of vision

 

 

 

 

 

 

in infants

 

 

 

6.17

The ability to assess symptoms and

Tables 13.2, 15.1; Chs 17, 18

 

 

 

 

 

signs of neurological significance

 

 

 

8.1

The ability to assess binocular status

Chs 2, 4, 5, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18

 

 

 

 

 

using objective and subjective tests

 

 

 

8.2

An understanding of the management

Chs 6–11, 14–18

 

 

 

 

 

of a patient with an anomaly of

 

 

 

 

 

 

binocular vision

 

 

 

8.3

The ability to investigate and manage

Chs 2, 6–10

 

 

 

 

 

adult patients presenting with

 

 

 

 

 

 

heterophoria

 

 

 

8.4

The ability to manage an adult patient

Chs 13–16

 

 

 

 

 

with heterotropia

 

 

 

8.5

The ability to manage children at risk of

Chs 2–6, 11, 13, 15

 

 

 

 

 

developing an anomaly of binocular vision

 

 

 

8.6

The ability to manage children

Chs 2–11, 13–18

 

 

 

 

 

presenting with an anomaly of

 

 

 

 

 

 

binocular vision

 

 

360

 

 

8.7

The ability to manage a patient presenting

Ch. 17

 

 

 

 

with an incomitant deviation